The Weird Experiment That Defies Logic
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 03. 2024
- Quantum entanglement still stumps scientists today. Try brilliant.org/Newsthink/ for FREE for 30 days, and the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual premium subscription.
Video on the double-slit experiment: • The Weird Experiment t...
CORRECTION: @3:44 should say 1,200 km, not 12,000 km on-screen
Follow Newsthink on X x.com/Newsthink
Newsthink is produced and presented by Cindy Pom
x.com/cindypom
Grab your Newsthink merch here: newsthink.creator-spring.com
Thank you to our Patrons, including:
John & Becki Johnston
Igli Laci
Support us on Patreon: / newsthink
Select images/video supplied by Alamy. - Věda a technologie
*What other videos would you like to see?*
CORRECTION: @3:44 should say 1,200 km, not 12,000 km on-screen
Try brilliant.org/Newsthink/ for FREE for 30 days, and the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual premium subscription
Would love to see a video of Larry and Sergey building an empire from a garade
When photons are not watched they behave like waves and when they are watched they behave like particles sounds contradictory. So, how do you watch the situation when the photons behave like waves? Because if you watch light particles when they behave like waves they behave like particles. But when you don't watch light particles behave like waves how do you know they behave like waves or particles when you don't watch them?
Any thoughts about videos of Blackholes!!!
Like most things in physics I suspect that there’s a simple explanation for this which we are yet to discover.
Or is just pure conjecture based upon layers of conjecture.
Entanglement messes with time.
While I’m sure you’re probably right, the only thing absolutely certain about is it messes with my mind 🥺
@@BluBlu777 😂
Time? What is the definition of time?
Using different perspectives as an analogy for different measurements is actually spot on. Suppose Alice measures her particle vertically and the result is "up" (the other possible measurement outcome is "down"). She knows that if Bob measures his entangled-partner particle in the same vertical perspective, he will also find "up" (I'm using the spin triplet state here, as in this video). So, if Bob instead measures his particle in the horizontal perspective, Alice expects his result to be zero, neither "left" nor "right", since there is no side-to-side motion associated with up-and-down motion and Alice knows Bob's particle is vertically "up". Instead, for all the trials when Alice's result is "up", Bob's horizontal measurements produce equal numbers of "left" and "right" outcomes, which only *average* to zero side-to-side. The same obtains for all the trials when Alice's result is "down". So, Alice says Bob's measurements are horrible! His outcomes are as wrong as possible in each and every trial even if they do average to the correct outcome overall.
Bob, feeling insulted, replies, "Wait a minute. I know if Alice had measured her particle horizontally, then she would have gotten "right" when I got "right" and "left" when I got "left", so clearly her particle has no up-and-down motion at all. Therefore, *she* is the one who should be finding a zero result when she measures her particle vertically!" And, sure enough, for all the trials when Bob's result is "right", Alice's vertical measurements produce equal numbers of "up" and "down" outcomes, which only *average* to zero up-and-down. The same obtains for all the trials when Bob's result is "left". So, whose measurements are correct? The relativity principle says everyone's perspectives (reference frames) are equally valid for making measurements, so they're both correct!
This is totally analogous to the situation in special relativity when Alice's perspective (reference frame) differs from Bob's by virtue of their relative motion. In that case, Bob's measurements of Alice's meter sticks clearly show they are smaller than his. But, Alice's measurements of Bob's meter sticks clearly show they are smaller than hers. Again, whose measurements are correct? Again, the relativity principle says their measurements are equally valid, so they're both correct!
See "Einstein's Entanglement: Bell Inequalities, Relativity, and the Qubit" due out in June 2024 with Oxford UP for the details 🙂
All videos in your channel is very good. I think your way or explaining things make it so easy to understand
Love the description
Just went through a wonderful wormhole love the content ❤
5:51 The Shanghai Maglev train doesn't use superconductors. It uses electromagnets through a Electromagnetic Suspension (EMS) system. The JR Chuo Shinkansen does use superconductors through the Electrodynamic system (EDS).
correct
thank you for the amazing content!
🤯 another great video
How i understand it, when two particles are entangled and you measure one and say, its spin is up then the other particle's spin is down.
That's the spin singlet state. This video uses the spin triplet state in its symmetry plane where the outcomes are always the same for the same measurements. See "Answering Mermin’s challenge with conservation per no preferred reference frame," Scientific Reports volume 10, Article number: 15771 (2020) or its more user-friendly version, "Einstein's missed opportunity to rid us of 'spooky actions at a distance'" on Science X (2020). Sorry, I can't supply the links or CZcams will delete this post.
Actually the double slit experiment has an explanation. When the particle is getting "observed" (here observed doesn't mean by a human) it uses photons which have high energy this in-turn collapses the wave function of the particle being observed.
And that's why when not observed particles create a wave pattern and when observed act as individual particles.
Ya but the wave pattern develops with each particle on the detector.. after many many times it's sorta like a painting being painted..
The fact remains, it's not explained in any way. It's just a controlled expairement that leads to many amazing conclutions that baffle common sense...
This is interesting frr ❤
Excellent!
❤❤❤🎉from London uk Veronica ngatia ❤❤❤❤❤
I'll bet he regretted using the word spooky. He was a man of science, not hocus pocus.
Thanks!
We’re entangled 😮
When photons are not watched they behave like waves and when they are watched they behave like particles sounds contradictory. So, how do you watch the situation when the photons behave like waves? Because if you watch light particles when they behave like waves they behave like particles. But when you don't watch light particles behave like waves how do you know they behave like waves or particles when you don't watch them?
love this❤
The most obvious problem with entanglement is that, by now, after billions of years, every particle in The universe would be entangled with every other particle in existence ( ? ) there would be no way to sort them out for any useful purpose ( ? ) !
Lets create two entangled electrons A & B with A spin up (Au) and b down (Bd). Keep A in Earth and send B to ISS. Now reverse electron A to Ad. What B should do?
Personally, I find quantum entanglement incredibly fascinating. The potential it could unlock. My biggest fantasy is that we could use it for Faster Than Light communication, each molecule acting as a bit. That's a lot of data.
And btw, that last thing about the photon-wave. From how I understand it, it's not really both. It's a proverbiality of where the individual photon will land, giving the illusion that it's a wave.
That's what I at least remember, and I could be wrong
We won't be able to do this. It would break causality.
@@JJs_playground Yes it would,so? It's just a theory,like the one that claimed the Earth was the center of the universe. And as a changed particle have the change spread along its past and future existence,that will be the funny part, we would be able to receive information sent by us from the future. That means you talking with yourelf without being crazy,hahaha
Please make a biography about Ludwig Boltzmann.. I really want to know about him..
So you said 1200 Km apart while displaying 12,000 km..... (@8:43) should this be blamed on quantum entanglement or just sloppy editing?
Ah my bad, good catch. It should say 1,200 km
parallel universe 😍
I wonder if that "special communication" between twins could actually depend on entanglement between particles in their brains?
Can these entanglement has anything to do with the planets supporting life in earth?
Observing during the process means interacting...............
Wow 😮
Good for Wi-Fi
doesnt this just show that the “superposition” concept is flawed. Its easy for “quantum entanglement “ to be explained if “superposition” isnt true
E = mc2 is spooky too, for it doesn't spesify what ENERGY really is.
That would have been the case if he meant there are
c² = 90 000 000 000
smaller particles corresponding to every unit of mass.
Then it would, of course, be a LOCALIZED physical formula.
As it currently stands, it too is only a mathematical formula that experiments confirm ~ hence not different from the situation with ENTANGLEMENT or Newton's explanation of gravity.
That the effect is observable in the immediate surrounding of the event doesn't render it LOCAL.
E = mc² is not LOCALIZED either. Hence SPOOKY.
But then, so are also the concepts of charges and spin, for there is nothing PHYSICAL in any particle to differentiate those properties from MASS, the only property of a particle that can be visualized as corresponding to its PHYSICAL volume. Then again, different MASSES of different particles must be proportional to their volume, for even this concept to be considered fully PHYSICAL.
Hence, our current atom model too is SPOOKY in many ways.
Energy means heat
Conciousness isn't created by brains. Conciousness is everywhere and everything.
Quantum entanglement is maybe the first physical evidence of this.
So the no conductor is the free will , but there's still some conductivity, otherwise our conduct would be ya ?
Rama Adhikari sounds like Elon musk
Have you actually tested entanglement billions of light years apart? Have you tested it a light year apart? How are you so sure it works instantaneously?
How does one know if 2 particles are entangled? Is it by chance? Or is all particles entangled but we are just testing 2 particles.
They take a photon and split its power by 50% using a crystals "beem splitter"
@@SecondChanceThrift-YucapiaCA oh. So it's from the same particle itself?
@@mysticery yes in two places. It's actually common, we just don't fully understand it. It's said that once someone finds the answer, we will all giggle and say ohhh daaahh!!!
But it's been a like over 100 years and only deeper questions. Look into the quantum eraser after the double slit becomes understandable confussing and enjoy..
( on a personal note.. in ur head, draw a line from the scientific from the silly guess or the mystical) there is a line.. it can be adjusted thru experiment however the line is real.)
Good to see a Bengali person in Caltech..
It proves the existance of the aether
and this proves i was right gravity is from mass leakes down from higher frequencies higher dementions is why it is the weakest of the four forces all around and part of everything and is instantainous not the curviture of space nonsence like einstein said and tesla said he was wrong on everything i ll go with tesla .
PrOcess
Sorry.. the balls will never be the same color after being veiwed. Never matching. Always oposite.. always.
That's not true. Using another metaphor, they can be correlated in opposite directions or in the same direction.
Ah yes the random CZcams commenter knows more than physics professors lol
Um... what? Can you please give me any link to any published peer
reviewed experiment that shows that " spin " in entangled anything is ever the same...
I'm no Richard or anything but.....
Thank You for backing me up here.
"Entangled photons, nonlocality, and Bell inequalities in the undergraduate laboratory" D. Dehlinger and M.W. Mitchell, American Journal of Physics 70(9), 903. @@SecondChanceThrift-YucapiaCA
And a 20% chance of being reasonable. What are you talking about? Listen to yourself. Lol. Nonsense.
STop Stop. This is an infection. Tread carefully... Bye
If you were paid to spout this crap, I would ask for my money back.
Perceived? Abstract? Have you heard yourself....an Exiton?. Mother of God. Turn yourself off.
...and God doesn't exist...
Nobody says God's don't exist. Just that their ain't any evidence of such things. Hard to prove a negative.
Or it proves god exists; if he had a model of the universe and manipulated it, then entanglement would change our observable universe.
@@buildaboiworkshop explain ur model?
Explain you evidence that this God is male as you reference him and that there is any experimental evidence of any of what your claiming other than belife in ur faith?... (I'm not arguing ur belife I'm just asking for supporting evidence)
No body?@@SecondChanceThrift-YucapiaCA
So brilliant is working with the AI slop channels now. Glad I cancelled my subscription
I would sugest to the people who work in the quantum research to try to study the retro-time effect,maybe the particles exists outside of our space-time dimensions and that causes manipulating a particle,the effect changes the particle along it's all past and future existence,including the moment when it was entangled,affecting the other entangled particles. It's just my dumb opinion,i don't have much knowledge in this domain, I'm not an educated person,i'm just an humble costruction worker.
Not to be offensive, but do you really understand the retro-time effect? If not, it makes no sense to suggest anything to experts in their field, as they certainly wouldn’t oversee anything of importance, that you „noticed“. I‘m no better in my understanding of this effect, but that comment makes no sense
@@herrroin6867 It makes no sense asking me if i understand something that i just described in my preious comment and it was not yet discovered by the human civilization, it's only an idea that could be true or wrong..... Also, my comment was not ment to be understood by everybody,but only by the people with a deep knowledge in the quantum field.
@@draculakickyourass you don’t have deep knowledge in this field, so it makes no sense to state rather random words linked together and hope it could help people who dedicate their lives to this. If you heard it somewhere, then the idea already was investigated. If it was yours, then it is unlikely that you understand everything about it and therefore is not useful.
@@herrroin6867 😄Your opinion about my knowlege have no logic,because you don't know me.If i work in construction doesn't make me an idiot,only a rebel who hates to sit in an office,but don't worry, i have a couple of friends who understood the idea,they are some of the most brilliant scientists wich designed the equipment at CERN. So, at your statement about not making sense only because YOU don't understand....i only can repeat: it wasn't ment to be understood by the large public,but by a small group of people wich you can count them on your fingers.
@@draculakickyourass Well I wouldn’t make these statements if you didn’t comment that you have next to no knowledge in that field and that your opinion is „dumb“, just as you said