light VS Schwarzschild Black Hole - 3D animation
Vložit
- čas přidán 29. 02. 2024
- some escape, some fall in, some orbit around...forever
simulation size - 100 GB
(shoutout to Pavel Rozhkov for his interesting animation)
/available for hire 3D modelling, animations, product launches, commercials/ atomicmarvel17@gmail.com
#Atomic #Marvel #Interstellar #Blackhole - Zábava
Pause at 1:05
All these paths that you see light taking, are geodesics. That means that these are STRAIGHT paths. If we could see in 4D these would be straight paths! Therefore Gravity is simply this local region of space litterally bending and curving into itself.
I mean it's a theory...pretty much everything about space is a theory.
1:13 New pink floyd album cover
Im sharing this and your page with all my friends and on fb, i absolutely LOVE models like this, especially sharing it with my friends, because it makes things much more simple for them to understand.
Mass of magical enoki mushrooms dance and slingshot around black ball, shooting off to their new destinations
Use the Schwartz, child.
I see your laser schwartz is as big as mine.
Why I'm hungry right now? Anyone got some yogurt? 😅
You see there's two sides to every schwarts, child
general savant requests orange slices NOW
👁️🫦👁️👌🏼❤️
They're jamming us! Taste like...raspberry?
My God, is full of spaghetti!
WoW! this was so satisfying and relaxing to watch!, great animation, many regards, :)
This universe is wild.
You need to do a video on R9X ninja blade missile
Pretty :3
Mmmm, pasghetti 🍝
🤩
they will not froze, they will just fall inside, and the photon sphere radius which fotons orbit is two times of event horizon radius.
mmm spaghetti.
all i see at the end is a rotated tiktok logo made of spaghetti
what program do you use?
That looks very wrong, e.g. there's clearly light bending towards the black hole, but then it bends away again. The simulation isn't realistic at all. Also, there seems to be light orbiting the black hole at various distances - but in reality, there's the so-called "photon sphere" for exactly this effect, and it has exactly 1.5 times the event horizon distance from the center (singularity) for a non-rotating (aka Schwarzschild-) black hole.
I love that you know that
who said it was suppose to be realistic tf LMAO your trying to make it out to be something completely different from what it is just enjoy watching it and stop dreading on the fact that it isnt realistic.
When it bends away that’s called hawking radiation
Really😢
Its energy is dissipating into outside potential its accurate
That doesn't look right.....light looks like it has mass and inertia here. What were you thinking?
But... photos *do* have mass (though almost negligible), and their path is affected by gravity. I can't speak to the accuracy of this simulation, but at a glance, I have no physics issues with it.
It's a simulation
@@rachelblack3816 No, gravity has no effect on photons. They always travel in a straight line. But the medium in which they travel, ie. spacetime, _is_ affected by gravity. They simply follow the curvature of spacetime like a straight line on a piece of paper. Distort the paper and the line will be conformed to it, but it is still a straight line on the surface of that piece of paper.
@@___Quasar___ Really?
@@Robin.Tussin Yes.
My God, it's full of Stars.
this isnt accurate in the slightest
I don’t remember anything saying it was in the title or desc?
@@Yluem That's not how rational human beings communicate.
In this context, accuracy of claims is assumed - otherwise the integrity of content is undermined.
1st principles are that you tell the truth and produce what is honest - as what is knowingly inaccurate, is misinformation and/or garbage. This is what's known as ethics.
That which is known to be inaccurate, is not fact, that is only interpretation or that might include some margin of error - should be disclaimed?
Where that isn't in place, and where something is wrong, it's then perfectly reasonable to say it's wrong - and the fact that there is no indication that it was ever supposed to be right, is not an excuse for anything and is actually totally meaningless - if not just idiotic.
By example: do you accept to buy a burger, find yourself poisoned - and then, when you complain, would you be happy to be told that no-one said the burger _wasn't_ made with rotten meat: so, actually, it's on you?....
Would that make sense to you? Because that's the equivalent to what you've written here.
What do you actually think you're talking about?
1000% accurate
doesn't matter
@@Robin.Tussin i aint reading allat
now i need huggy wuggy vs among us
no
@@frroog yes
@@aalcomtive no
@@frroog yes yes yes 3x
@@aalcomtive No.