Catch-22 (8/10) Movie CLIP - Poor Hungry Joe (1970) HD
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 11. 2011
- Catch-22 movie clips: j.mp/1BcPxTS
BUY THE MOVIE: amzn.to/sW9BrI
Don't miss the HOTTEST NEW TRAILERS: bit.ly/1u2y6pr
CLIP DESCRIPTION:
Yossarian (Alan Arkin) watches as an airplane accident causes several deaths.
FILM DESCRIPTION:
Director Mike Nichols and writer-actor Buck Henry followed their enormous hit The Graduate (1967) with this timely adaptation of Joseph Heller's satiric antiwar novel. Haunted by the death of a young gunner, all-too-sane Capt. Yossarian (Alan Arkin) wants out of the rest of his WW II bombing missions, but publicity-obsessed commander Colonel Cathcart (Martin Balsam) and his yes man, Colonel Korn (Henry), keep raising the number of missions that Yossarian and his comrades are required to fly. After Doc Daneeka (Jack Gilford) tells Yossarian that he cannot declare him insane if Yossarian knows that it's insane to keep flying, Yossarian tries to play crazy by, among other things, showing up nude in front of despotic General Dreedle (Orson Welles). As all of Yossarian's initially even-keeled friends, such as Nately (Art Garfunkel) and Dobbs (Martin Sheen), genuinely lose their heads, and the troop's supplies are bartered away for profit by the ultra-entrepreneurial Milo Minderbinder (Jon Voight), Yossarian realizes that the whole system has lost it, and he can either play along or jump ship. Though not about Vietnam, Catch-22's ludicrous military machinations directly evoked its contemporary context in the Vietnam era. Cathcart and Dreedle care more about the appearance of power than about victory, and Milo cares for money above all, as the complex narrative structure of Yossarian's flashbacks renders the escalating events appropriately surreal. Confident that the combination of a hot director and a popular, culturally relevant novel would spell blockbuster, Paramount spent a great deal of money on Catch-22, but it wound up getting trumped by another 1970 antiwar farce: Robert Altman's MASH. With audiences opting for Altman's casual Korean War iconoclasm over Nichols' more polished symbolism, the highly anticipated Catch-22 flopped, although the New York Film Critics Circle did acknowledge Arkin and Nichols. Despite this reception, Catch-22's ensemble cast and pungent sensibility effectively underline the insanity of war, Vietnam and otherwise.
CREDITS:
TM & © Paramount (1970)
Cast: Seth Allen, Alan Arkin, Norman Fell, Jack Gilford, Anthony Perkins, Paula Prentiss
Director: Mike Nichols
Producers: John Calley, Martin Ransohoff, Clive Reed
Screenwriters: Joseph Heller, Buck Henry
WHO ARE WE?
The MOVIECLIPS channel is the largest collection of licensed movie clips on the web. Here you will find unforgettable moments, scenes and lines from all your favorite films. Made by movie fans, for movie fans.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR MOVIE CHANNELS:
MOVIECLIPS: bit.ly/1u2yaWd
ComingSoon: bit.ly/1DVpgtR
Indie & Film Festivals: bit.ly/1wbkfYg
Hero Central: bit.ly/1AMUZwv
Extras: bit.ly/1u431fr
Classic Trailers: bit.ly/1u43jDe
Pop-Up Trailers: bit.ly/1z7EtZR
Movie News: bit.ly/1C3Ncd2
Movie Games: bit.ly/1ygDV13
Fandango: bit.ly/1Bl79ye
Fandango FrontRunners: bit.ly/1CggQfC
HIT US UP:
Facebook: on. 1y8M8ax
Twitter: bit.ly/1ghOWmt
Pinterest: bit.ly/14wL9De
Tumblr: bit.ly/1vUwhH7 - Krátké a kreslené filmy
'He's probably afraid to come down,' Sergeant Knight answered, without
moving his solemn gaze from McWatt's solitary climbing airplane. 'He
knows what kind of trouble he's in.' And McWatt kept climbing higher and
higher, nosing his droning airplane upward evenly in a slow, oval
spiral that carried him far out over the water as he headed south and
far in over the russet foothills when he had circled the landing field
again and was flying north. He was soon up over five thousand feet. His
engines were soft as whispers. A white parachute popped open suddenly in
a surprising puff. A second parachute popped open a few minutes later
and coasted down, like the first, directly in toward the clearing of the
landing strip. There was no motion on the ground. The plane continued
south for thirty seconds more, following the same pattern, familiar and
predictable now, and McWatt lifted a wing and banked gracefully around
into his turn.
'Two more to go,' said Sergeant Knight. 'McWatt and Doc Daneeka.'
'I'm right here, Sergeant Knight,' Doc Daneeka told him plaintively. 'I'm not in the plane.'
'Why don't they jump?' Sergeant Knight asked, pleading aloud to himself. 'Why don't they jump?'
'It doesn't make sense,' grieved Doc Daneeka, biting his lip. 'It
just doesn't make sense.' But Yossarian understood suddenly why McWatt
wouldn't jump, and went running uncontrollably down the whole length of
the squadron after McWatt's plane, waving his arms and shouting up at
him imploringly to come down, McWatt, come down; but no one seemed to
hear, certainly not McWatt, and a great, choking moan tore from
Yossarian's throat as McWatt turned again, dipped his wings once in
salute, decided oh, well, what the hell, and flew into a mountain.
Good god, you don’t need to hit enter after
every single line.
@fortunatebum it's probably a format issue from him copying & pasting it from another passage
This film's strange dream like absurdity just accentuates the brief moments of shockingly tragic violence and gore.
The book is so expansive, there's NO way they could have easily given it the due justice it deserved in movie form. I they made a movie word for word, it would be a 6 hour movie, so they took snippets- sorta like Cliff's Notes and made a movie that way of it. It's a busy storyline in the book, and you really have to pay attention to details to get all the satire out of it.
Yeah, I can't blame the book for combining/rearranging elements from the book, but I just think the execution was all over the place. This scene is a prime example, I have no problem with Hungry Joe taking Kid Sampson's place, but Yossarian's "meh" reaction is a betrayal of his character and what he's supposed to be going through. In the book, he's screaming for McWatt to come back and not to kill himself, but here he has a much more "oh, that's a shame" attitude about the whole thing. Aside from Daneeka being mistaken for being on the plane, it's a very serious/dramatic scene in the book, and here it's like they're trying to make it humorous in a surrealist kind of way even though it's not supposed to be.
Watch the Hulu mini series
I never mistook this scene for comedy.
The film could do with being 3 and a half hours long. But it would need to be near perfectly executed to get most of the book in and to make it not jumbled up
Hulu messed up one of my favorite moments from the book...the argument over what the God they each didn't believe in was like.
When nobody was looking, Norman Bates swam out and retrieved the body pieces then recovered the other body from the wreckage. He preserved them in his root cellar for ten years.
Kid Sampson is supposed to get killed here.
And two the water was supposed to be full of people who proceeded to flee
Enrico Cortes also there is supposed to be a chaotic scene at the beach
Hmm. I wasn't convinced this book could be made into a movie. I don't think I'll watch it.
Happened in the series Catch 22
Julio Suarez - are you talking about the book? I haven’t read it.
That was my absolute favourite part; McWatt's final flight. It was a really touching part for me, especially when Yossarian ran down the runway screaming. and I must've reread it at least 5 times.
It's a shame that they changed it for the movie. The people here didn't seem to react properly.
It's hilarious though. And complete madness
If I had been in WWII I'd have wanted to be in stationed in the same outfit as Paula Prentiss.
It is so sad that Kid Sampson, McWatt and Doc Daneeka had to die such terrible way. :(
Doc never died. He wasn't even in the plane
@@jewelmathew3457 according to the records he was
@ffarkasm but he's actually alive, isn't he? 🤔
imagine this level of under reaction in any other scenario. "Oh, the Hindenburg appears to be combusting. It is crashing. There is a woman throwing her children out of the window to their deaths as opposed to letting them burn alive. Oh." My god! Hulu adaptation gave me nightmares for weeks.
Yossarian was way more emotional in the book than in this scene. Also in the book it’s kid Sampson that gets cut in half.
I was maybe 12 when I saw this for the first time. It gave me nightmares for weeks.
+Mike Dumas Same here.
Saw it on Hulu! Was also traumatized.
Hungry Joe died when Huple's cat finally suffocated him.
In spite of all the comparisons with the novel still the craziest scene of the whole movie. Pure madness.
And great filmmaking (thank you, Mike Nichols) and excellent adaptation of Heller's book by Buck Henry. A masterpiece in my book.
The plane cut Kid Sampson in half when he naively jumped for the plane, and the beach broke in complete chaos... They could've done better with this movie... Hope to see it remade some day!
Well your dreams have come true, check out the Hulu miniseries
Wish granted
A moment of silence...for doc daneeka
R.I.P DOC 😥😥😥
book scene was much better
poor hungry joe...poor mcwatt...poor doc.
...i'm right here. lol
What really cracked me up about Catch-22 was John Voight's character constantly profiting from the war and not wasting any time to make a buck.
(Not an exact quote).
Milo: _"Yossarian. Eat this."_
Yossarian: _"What is it?"_
Milo: _"Just eat it, Yossarian."_
Yossarian bites into it.
Yossarian: _"Ah!!! What is that?"_
Milo: _"Chocolate Cotton."_
.
Man, this scene was so incredibly good and powerful in the book, I don't understand why they had to water it down so much for the movie. What a shame.
Yeah the film needed to be atleast 30 minutes longer, i could barely figure out who was who because theres no proper introductions because its so compressed.
Yeah agree
It wasn't changed for the movie. When I saw the film at an Australian drive-in in '71, it was a nude girl who got cut in half.
The guy cut in half was Kid Samson right?
The character cut in half in the movie is Hungry Joe as played by the uncredited Seth Allen. This was an incredibly difficult scene to shoot. Frank Tallman was the stunt pilot whose propellor chopped the synthetic Hungry Joe in half. One can clearly see Hungry Joe with a camera on the raft since he was the squadron photographer. Another rather obvious giveaway is that Yossarian identifies the individual as Hungry Joe.
Later in the scene, McWatt, the pilot of the plane, commits suicide by appearing to fly into a mountain although Tallman was of course the actual pilot. Ironically, on Saturday 15 April 1978, Tallman was making a routine ferry flight in a twin-engine Piper Aztec from Santa Monica Airport, California, to Phoenix, Arizona under visual flight rules when he continued the flight into deteriorating weather, a lowering ceiling and rain. He struck the side of Santiago Peak in the Santa Ana Mountains near Trabuco Canyon at cruise altitude, dying in the ensuing crash.
The body double was holding a mirror. Nichols says so on the DVD commentary with Steve Soderbergh.
The planet crash is a simple removal of a few frames.
Fuck cgi.
Cut it too short; cut off the punchline ("Poor Doc") at the end.
This is a movie. NOT THE BOOK. Why do comments keep criticizing this scene so much? WTFC? It's powerful, in and of itself. Stop comparing the book to the movie. They are two separate works of art.
+Byron Gordon It seems weird that the replace the Kid Sampson with Hungry Joe but they way he dies is the same.
I think it's because the screenwriter just couldn't fit every principal character from the novel into the movie. It would have become too convoluted and the movie would have become too long. He had to make a cut and decided it was Hungry Joe.
+Byron Gordon THANK YOU! Totally agreed
Stupid kids have homework assignments, Byron.
The Hulu scene genuinely disturbed me
Sheesh - this is nothing like the book; Hungry Joe actually dies when Ripley decides to nuke the site from orbit (the only way to be sure, of course).
Paula Prentiss is a stone cold knockout.
this scene is 10x more powerful in the hulu series, did the book more justice in my opinion
The movie is better than the book.
The positioning of the propeller blades would need to be in a different position to cut the person in half like that
In the book it was a different kind of plane. They didn’t do the scene right in this movie. Missed a lot. The movie was pretty good, but this scene didn’t translate right.
This portrays what war is - people do stuff that ends up with there bodies all messed up in very extreme ways - often they are torn apart or else splatted so much that they are almost completely unreconisable - then there friends go like oh what happened ?? and shake there heads in amazement...
Oh, well, what the hell.
Had the Pilot survived he would be on a murder charge . Automatic military death penalty.
heres where the doc learns about Catch 23. when you die on paper you are dead to the world
Nailed it. Fn nailed it.
ヘラーの原作は傑作。
映画化に時間かかったのも当然、
勿論映画も大傑作。
In the book, McWatt is buzzing them and when he flies over the raft Kid Sampson stands up during a pass when Mc Watt is too low to correct.
Never quite understood this sequence? So Hungry Joe was jealous, and it's like he's done these fly by's before? And did he mean to kill this Kid Samson, or just meant to scare him yet again? I think the movie is as phenomenal as Kubrick's version of The Shining, but admit Nichols and Henry took it far from the Heller novel. I love the photography and surreal dreamlike state of the film, and even how Doc gets 'written off' in this particular scene as another casualty of war. (The Forgotten Pacifist...?) But this scene could've been better fleshed out, or establish Hungry Joe a bit better beforehand.
McWatt would regularly buzz Yossarian's tent, and was messing around buzzing the beach. Kid Sampson tried to jump up to touch the plane as a goof, just as McWatt took the plane down just a bit too low (I assumed he wanted to get really close and obviously didn't expect Kid Sampson to jump for his plane) and cut him down.
Hungry Joe is the one in this scene who gets cut in half. In the book it was Kid Sampson who got cut in half. In both cases it was McWatt who was responsible.
Hey, it's Mr. Roper from Three's Company!
Poor Hungry Joe
Ain't hungry no mo'...
They cut before the punch line.
Came for Paula Prentiss, stayed for the decapitation
people seem to not get it was supposed to be a weird movie about the strangeness of war.
If you really need to see it either rent/ buy the dvd or watch it in viooz.co.
Man in the book it's different. Kid Sampson gets buzzed. It's Hungry Joe here weird.
Top rate comic absurdism done well here and really carried off by Heller in the novel.
Read the book, and I really don't mean that in a snide, preachy "books are better than films" sort of way - there is so much more to the book than they could ever have put in the film, and I don't want to throw a load of spoilers at you.
Oh, well, what the hell.
Oh, das war Nr.1.
Oh, well, what the hell....
If you put the speed to .25 you can see right where it cuts to the explosion at 1:42
The plane flew Behind the Mountain, and they detonated an explosion on the hillside.
Scetch 1?
Who was it? Bob Hartley's dentist friend
I'm reading the book for the first time and I want to make sure I'm interpreting the film scene correctly:
- Kid Sampson is still the one getting buzzed
- In the film, Hungry Joe is identified as the pilot, butt McWatt and Doc Daneeka are his passengers on the flight log, so McWatt still dies but not as the pilot?
You're right about the first thing but McWatt is the pilot and in the film, Hungry Joe gets killed and in the book, kid Sampson is killed
0:12
for those who never read ))))
Not sure why they switched Hungry Joe for Kid Samson in this scene. In the book, it's Kid Samson who gets killed, not Hungry Joe. Maybe it was just an error
Simple script error on set. Not unusual with a busy schedule. Or the actor confused his name's and everyone played off of it, regardless. That happens too.
I was excited to find that there was a movie, but to see that they fucked up such an important and memorable moment, I'm not interested anymore.
TheShameofaNation same
The movie is worth a watch.
Try to watch this scene in the new Hulu series, you won't be disappointed.
@@merangoo8372 I ain't paying for Hulu just to see one series. Doctors see anything else on there.
Hahahaha
Sympatic men. Vote me for president.
You hit a 200 lb man with a stinson you will destroy the airplane and stop almost dead. I know it’s only a movie but still.
Why did he remain standing as the plane was coming at him? The natural instinct is to hit the deck. Was he intentionally trying to get himself killed?
@@abc64pan he was playing chicken and he lost.
@@abc64pan in the book it's a bright-eyed young man who was playing around and jumped like he was gonna touch, just being a idiot kid basically. Well, the pilot dipped more than they both expected, and he did touch the plane.
In the book it was Kid Sampson killed in that scene
The remake did this scene a good deed
Kid sampson, ACTUALLY
Way worse in the Hulu one, plus Hulu made is much more emotional to the point where it’s like a car crash, you can’t look away
Book was way better then the movie.
The book was based on actual events, showing the crazy effects war can have.
Why i cannot see full lenght movie ,ALWAYS THOSE STUPID CUTS AND TRAILERS
I've never read the book, but this scene makes no sense at all. Are we suppose to guess as to why McWatt kills Hungry Joe? This is a decent movie but the absurdity level gets out of hand at times. MASH was a much better black comedy. So was Dr. Strangelove.
Eric M nah, this scene makes sense, but in the book.
He was trying to scare the new bombardiers by flying low to the ground, he also tried to frighten his friends on the ground habitually by doing the same thing. He hit joe (Kid sampson in the book) accidentally, didnt kniw what the hell to do and killed himself.
They changed the scene. In the original scene, it was a nude girl who got cut in half. My friend said she was wearing a funning look bikini bottom and I had to point out she was nude.
0:11