Highlights from Congress' First UFO Hearing in 50 Years
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 06. 2024
- Support this channel by using the SUPER THANKS (heart icon above) or by becoming a Patron at / wardcarroll
Buy one or all three of the books in the PUNK'S TRILOGY, Ward's popular first three novels about life a Tomcat squadron, at www.usni.org/punks-trilogy-re.... Use the PUNKYT discount code at checkout for 25% off to CZcams channel subscribers.
Also available in KINDLE format here: www.amazon.com/dp/B09R1MX8SY
And as an audiobook here: www.audible.com/pd/Punks-War-...
Get official channel gear at my-store-b7f9c9.creator-sprin...
In this episode Ward reviews the highlights of the first Congressional hearing on UFOs in 50 years. - Zábava
I like the way you give the news here. Just the facts... Man I miss those days of just good reporting. Thank you.
I can appreciate the "just the facts" reporting style, but I'd be lying if I said that I wasn't disappointed that Ward didn't give any opinion or anecdotal experiences of the subject. I don't think that it would have hurt the integrity of the piece any if Ward had said at the end wether or not he or his colleagues had any UAP sightings.
The Malmstrom AFB missile incident is WELL documented. The fact that these guys went before Congress and were not well informed on this incident is EMBARASSING.
Maybe more informed than appeared.
Perhaps crystal clear directives to play dumb.
And dumber.
When they look each others way before answering they're acknowledging their orders & confirming support.
You don't spend 40 years in intelligence - and become the front line hill spokesman - without being smart enough to know how & when to roll over and play dumb.
With respect.
Ignorance is bliss.
But I agree Malstrom is undeniable.
Unfortunately "we" can't go speak, aka rarely will they allow Joe Average to speak regardless of how informative he may be.
"I have no recollection of that, Senator"
In this case Congressman, but you get the point...
They drove to the hearing in a DODGE.
It's not though. It was totally made up for those stupid UFO shows on the History and Discovery channels.
Thank you Ward for your willingness to report on this and in doing so in a reasonable manner.
During 1970 those "somethings" were frequently observed by fmr. Yugoslav AF pilots above northern and central Croatia and northern Bosnia. On some occasions, several squadrons of Mig 21s were scrambled to monitor these "somethings". The most peculiar thing is, the high brass of YAF thought those were some NATO i.e. American aircraft.
I too feel bad for Alexi. They are using VLC viewer (great free app), and it has trouble pausing on the end of video clips. It is possible to go frame by frame, but you have to know to hit the 'e' key or turn on the advanced controls and hit a non-obvious button. (The current version actually looks different than the button in the documentation) I've done it before, and I had to look it up again. I would not want to have to remember that in front of a congressional hearing.
That freeze frame scene was painful. Why did they not have a PowerPoint with perfectly selected images. Amateur hour.
I've always been intrigued by Arthur C. Clarke's great observation: "Only two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the universe, or we are not. Both are equally terrifying!" Rod Serling couldn't have coined this any better!!
“The Ghost of Alpha Centauri”
It's actually a compilation of several Alpha Centauri pilots into one character.
Did Congressman Gallagher at the UAP hearing just ask the Pentagon about the 10 Malmstrom Nuclear ICBMs shut down by a UFO in 1967 = Then he asked about the Joint Chief Admiral Tom Wilson Memo where he
admits to MJ12 and Roswell recovery Holy Molly 😜 That was worth it right there
The UFO interest into nuclear weapons and the Malmstrom incident isn’t new witnesses have gone on the record ages ago. I remember reading about it in the early 80’s. The fact they will talk about it in open public hearings is amazing.
They always try to diminish the efforts to document these things with the science fiction/alien mocking. I wish people would stop trying to assign origins before we even confirm authenticity. These events are being witnessed, and SOME of them have no conventional explanation. If we can start at that baseline, and just agree on that simple fact, then maybe we can take some small baby steps forward and eliminate the speculation, scoffing, and division that are interfering with finding out what's actually going on.
If I was an alien, even just a few decades ahead in technology, I would sit in orbit maintaining a disinformation campaign to create ridicule of anyone trying to study me.
It would be the easiest way to CYA. I would also manipulate the heck out of their stock markets, and media.
Basic experimental controls to study humans in a more "natural" state.
Just saying.
/Tinfoil hat
There is a large number of people who claim they have seen Bigfoot, and it’s likely that more than half the population believes they probably exist. Same with UFOs, Nessie, etc. But after 75 years of UFO reports, none have crashed, no collisions with them have occurred, no abductions have been verified. Scientists have no interest in them, the military has no interest in them.
My belief in God does not allow for alien life. To look for it or assume it also doesn’t fit in my belief structure. In fact psychiatrists will tell you that I am not psychologically capable of accepting any findings indicating alien life. I am 10 million+ devout believers strong. I also have the entire Catholic Church hierarchy in my pocket.
- Not really me but you understand why I believe info is and will continue to be suppressed. Just my 0.02
Did Congressman Gallagher at the UAP hearing just ask the Pentagon about the 10 Malmstrom Nuclear ICBMs shut down by a UFO in 1967 = Then he asked about the Joint Chief Admiral Tom Wilson Memo where he
admits to MJ12 and Roswell recovery Holy Molly 😜 That was worth it right there
@@CorePathway god supposedly created earth and it's creatures so he is from somewhere else which by definition makes him an alien along with his angels.
Thanks, Ward, for the highlights 🙂
Ward, you are amazing! Thanks for an interesting and entertaining report.
I'm glad that Scott Bray finished off his commentary on the "triangles" recorded by SLR through NVGs as being *caused by* the SLR/NVG combination. My first reaction on seeing the flashing "triangle" is that it was a classic optical aberration. Anyone with an observational background in astronomy would have recogised that immediately, as, I'm sure, would many photographers.
And as for the object in the first video, where the staffer had so much difficulty freeze-framing because they don't know the basics of using VLC(!), isn't it obviously a helium filled balloon? Millions of these are released into the air every day by people all around the world, and they often travel thousands of kilometres before they burst, or lose enough helium to fall to the surface, as so much plastic pollution. Yes, it's an example of what Scott Bray earlier described as "air trash".
Overall, a very well balanced set of questions an answers on a subject that needs detailed examination. However, I think it should be dealt with primarily as a scientific study -- after all, the methods and techniques of science are all about turning the unknown into the known while being grounded in reality. Thereafter it would be determined whether there is in fact an intelligence/security threat.
There is also the problem with parallax. It is not revealed how fast the jet was flying or whether it was veering of or going straight ahead which can explain an illusion of speed by the UAP. I stumbled across a CZcams channel where professional special effects technicians quickly recreate these UAP effects very easily while explaining them. As someone who has been fascinated by UFOs since the 1960s, I have yet to see a single example of compelling evidence that would argue in favor of the existence of extraterrestrials visiting or probing us. This is just a political distraction.
As our technology advances, we are more capable of recognizing what very well could be natural earth phenomena. We as a race of humans have only scratched the surface of knowledge and understanding.
As an aside, my grandfather was born before the first powered air flight. Look at how far we have come in such a short time.
Wow denial is not only a river in Africa.
Agreed. And the cigar shape uap’s are in fact not cigar. It’s elongated as it’s pretty much starionary and the observer is moving at a fast speed. Because they are not fixated on the object only when it passes by at that exact time it’s possible for the human brain and eye to observe it. As if it was elongated. When it fact it’s not. So most likely again. Something floating not travelling at much of a speed
I don't know but in most cases I think the pilots would know if the object was passing at a fast rate or if that was just them moving fast. Particularly fighter pilots/RIOs/WSOs would be pretty capable in this type of assessment I would expect. This is because dogfighting with enemy aircraft is their expertise and so they should have a pretty good grasp of this kind of thing.
I think Carl Sagan had it correctly when he wrote - "If there is only us - what a waste of space!"
The space is not wasted if the God that created it is greater, has a bigger heart then men can ever imagine.
Speaking for yourself, perhaps you are correct.
@@beyond_the_infinite2098 its you who comes off as of limited mind mr "beyond the infinite" lol
Carl Sagan missed much.
@@timefliesasyougetolder6815 - missed much - or much missed? :-)
This group should call in some experienced people that know what they’re talking about
Like Scully and Mulder...
Where are the pilots and radar operators? Flight crews? These two are management buffers to generalize and bore us with non answers. Where are the tic tac tapes that were taken ,who did it, who approved it? The CIA and NSA should be up there to provide answers on blacked out docs from 50 years ago.
Mork Mork from Ork passed away.
If Stanton Friedman was still with us, he'd probably be glad to testify.
You are great. I look forward to you're input in these matters
Another excellent video, thank you 🛸!!
I really enjoy your videos Mr Carroll, thanks for making them and sharing
Your coverage of this, the docs released and the initial report has just been fantastic. Crisp, no nonsense, just facts. Thank you!
I do wish this video had more analysis and was less of a compilation of highlights or even lowlights. But Ward did call this a HIGHLIGHT video, and he was largely correct. I fast forwarded through most of it looking for analysis or even speculation and was disappointed it had little of either. But it was as described so the expectations were on me.
Today, they know better. Yeah right. Everything all around the country on every level screams knowledge and understanding.
All the real problems this country has and congress can only come together on this.
What makes you think that this isn't a real problem? Unidentified drones shutting down our nuclear missels is a very real concern.
@@richardjstuart3978 SLBMs, too? B-52 standoff-launched nuclear armed cruise missiles, too? Etc...
See the UFO with flashing running lights starting at 6:30, just what alien or hostile nation UFOs need, followed by a "mysterious" triangular shaped flasher... cause by out of focus camera lens bokeh. There is a patent for a sub-launched spherical balloon carrying a radar retroreflector internally which matches exactly what F-18 pilots have seen. Its intent is to activate for analysis defensive systems like ships' radar and defensive aircraft actions. I suspect most if not all of this is either black world red team activities or the same from an adversary. The DoD claim that they aren't responsible means absolutely NOTHING. That's why they call it "black world."
Yes. Pure silliness.
With Rick Crawford being a RINO, how right you are. This is just a bait and switch operation???
Congress came together and finally solved the problem of daylight savings time, also.
/S
I must agree, Mooch. The Pentagon's credibility has, again, suffered greatly on this issue. There are few that actually believe their obfuscations and straight-faced lies.
Mick West and the folks at Skeptical Inquirer (started by the arch-debunker Phil Klass) come to mind.
Thanks Ward! Love your commentary 👌
That was optimistic. Thank you Capt.
Congrats on 250 thousand subs Mooch!
Here's cheers to 250 thousand more!
Excellent summary, thank you!
Thanks!
These UAPs are not of either Chinese or Russian origin.
Lol I swear it’s just a secret us gov black project thing or something else
@@CanadianAviation12 The Government UFO hearing was a nothing burger. These UFO's are Mach 71 Amazon delivery drones. This is not alien technology. Take the tin foil hat off psychos!
@@CanadianAviation12 Do you undestand that this phenomenon is observed back in 40-50s? Now its easy to say yes it is a drone it is a CGI or black project. But no way back in then. Propulsion like this just doesnt appear out of nowhere. It goes against everything our sience has to offer. People are giving military too much credit. Every single discovery and tech what we use has a orgin in sience. Atomic bomb? albert einstein and list goes on. Only after some great discovery in sience and many decades after that there is tech what uses same principle. Yes military makes stuff but that is just because decades of sience has given basic information and data to go there.
But we can agree that this Uap thing is real and have been here a long time.
I think reasons why this is still so big secret is that this tech is so huge that humanity isnt ready for it.
1= antigravity ufo in hands of enemy is just something you cant defeat. It can wipe your fleet and army. Thats just my opinion on this matter based on many years of intrest.
First i was this is just bullshit but too many high level people have come forward. Too many stories with credible witnesses.
Loui Elizondo is someone who you all should look what he has to say and also Ross Coulthard.
Sorry for my bad english
Over 20 Airmen were involved and reported the Maelstrom AFB incident, and lent their testimony to public investigations. But DOD...Duuurrrrrrrr
Congrats on 1/4 M subscribers!
Another great video, Mooch!
I agree with you Commander, I would NOT feel comfortable if called 'on the carpet to discuss a sighting of a UAP (UFO), I recall back in the day one did not report such things if one wanted to continue the career path. Operating out of Beaufort, I was told ' It's swamp gas kid....even at Angels 25, it's swamp gas.' Then again at Iwakuni, skip said " It's swamp gas or a Japanese weather balloon, your pic.' The Whale crew saw it also, but.....that was then this is now, glad some things have changed! Check Six!
This is why destigmatizing it is important. The only thing though is in other areas and time frames lots of stuff we civilians do know about, and they're still sticking to 2000s onwards. Gonna have to broaden it way more than that.
Another good one, Ward.
So interesting! 👍🏼
That was good - thank you.
I would think that Mooch with all of his NavAir contacts could speak to a pilot that was involved in a sighting other than Capt Fravor whom we have already heard from.
according to tom cruise, aliens pop out of volcanos
What we need is a way for Adam Schiff to talk without lying. It is embarrassing to have him as your representative.
Unless you live in a sliver of north Los Angeles, not really something you have to worry about.
You could move to North Georgia...
On Topic: Thanks for this presentation.
Off Topic: Nice Guitars!
I always smile when I get a new video notification from you Ward. I hope you are well.
congrats on 250k subscribers!
The government or military talking about this stuff always just make me roll my eyes and wonder what they're trying to distract the peons from.
Don,t need to guess what they're trying to distract us from this time since everything is on fire.
That would make more sense if anyone but a tiny minority actually paid attention to this kind of thing.
And “everything on fire” seems extreme. Things aren’t that bad, at least so far, in this country. If we were in Ukraine, then yeah, time to hit that panic button. 😄
" I occasionally think how quickly our differences, worldwide, would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world."
Keep you're eyes open.
All the world is a stage.
Ronald Reagan
The issue I have with open sessions, whether it be Congress or elsewhere, is that national security for obvious reasons, limits what people are able and willing to admit to.
There's likely two thirds of this iceberg at least, that won't see the light of day. At least not for many decades.
At some point it was even mentioned being "better discussed behind closed doors" or words to that effect.
Maybe closed sessions but similar premise.
Definitely a part of the dialog.
second the motion
Yeah, but that is part of general life. It is human nature to only be public with the information that you are sure off, and hesitant to give out ammunition to people that don't necessary have your best interest in mind. You can only hope that people with appropriate authority are able to create a setting where open discussion and information exchange can be achieved, and that is precisely where tension between better cooperation and better legislative control arises. Where does a mutual supporting working relationship end up being a 'corrupt clique'? That depends on the eye of the beholder and in with what purpose they are operating.
This is just tough data analysis, and I think it is underestimated how much effort needs to be taken to make sense of it. Professionally I work with pretty sensitive high tech engineering, and the difference between 'we have to completely understand this failure mechanism' or 'let's just make it a bit stronger / robust' can be the difference between a few afternoons work or multi-year, 100 thousands budgets with the risk that you still end up with 'we need to make it a bit stronger / robust' (That basically sums up the last 8 months of the project I am supporting). Real life takes a lot of short cuts, knowing it saves a lot of resources and does not impact final result.
We still life in a world with resource scarcity, can you afford to have all the brightest people working on projects with a high risk of limited return?
I've been interested in UFOs/UAPs for 50 years because my parents and I saw one during the "Flap" in the 1970s. I'm not a pilot but I know what is possible for a terrestrial craft and what isn't. We were travelling by car when we saw one hovering over a field making no sound at all. It rose vertically and zoomed off from a dead stop and took off way past the Mach. Early AV8Bs couldn't even dream of what that thing did. No sound at all, no sonic boom, nothing! 50 years later and there is still nothing comparable to it. From 80 years ago with Foo Fighters to today's "Tic Tacs" they've been interested in both Naval and Air Power. I can't help thinking though, that almost a century with technology as advanced as they've shown, I think we would know for sure if they were hostile by now.
The problem is that you can't prove it. Most of the reports consist of narratives without evidence and so there is nothing to investigate.
i & another then-Viet Nam War Military Wife clearly saw one 'above the May Company' only infinitely Higher for several minutes of a long traffic light while in Los Angeles County fairly near Canoga Park; and, my late-Father, a US Weather Bureau Meteorologist for 31 Years + Six (6) Years of US Navy Weather Science School with The Atlantic Fleet until the end of WW2 and soon after his first Duty Station on Wake island.. Prior to Pearl Harbor as he was in the Navy just a few days after his 1938 HS Graduation; &, he saw Three (3) different UFO's with one while in Glacier National Park, in NW Montana + back East and while with the Weather Bureau for Missile shots by Cape Canaveral/Cape Kennedy while on ships in Bermuda and Puerto Rico coordinated though Wallops island, Virginia's Weather Station very near Assateague and Chincoteague^^ Xoxo ⚓✨💌
My Mom and i saw Two (2) Spies transporting_ while walking in opposite directions_most probably Classified Documents by way of a folded newspaper in Freiburg, FRG December 1982 of which i Only told the LTC iG and Counter-and Counter-Counter intelligence men next door to each other just across the street from my BDE HQ's B/D.... 😸😎
@@lornakim5706 I've been to Chincoteague and Assateague for Pony Penning. It wouldn't surprise me a bit if Wallops had sightings. As for the Triangle, that's a given.
@@lornakim5706 Tsk, tsk, they were "Intelligence Agents." My brother was USAF Black Op's in 'Nam. I don't have a clue what he might have seen or "not seen".
Thanks for watching that session, so I didn´t have to ;-)
Half way through and impressed so far. BZ to Adam Schiff even- never thought I’d say that in my life!
Commented about 30 seconds to soon… went south after Schiff, didn’t it…
I wonder about the triangles flashing lights in a regular, rhythmic manner.
Do Extraterrestrials really require that they display running lights whenever they are buzzing US Navy fighters?
So if it wasn't a flying triangle flying around the navy vessels that night, what was it and why wasn't it engaged? Can a fleet of civilian drones harass a navy ship at night without consequence? Can a fleet of adversarial planes/drones swarm a navy ship without consequence? Why can't the navy identify a fleet of civilian or adversarial aircraft that swarm them at night? Are they that incompetent? My belief is "NO". It was NOT something terrestrial, that's why all they could do was film it. I'm pretty sure they would realize with radar and/or other sensor systems that it was a UFO prompting them to film it with night vision or do naval personnel routinely film planes/drones at nighttime?
Hay Ward, I just watched TG Maverick. I loved it. it is Monday 23 May 22 & I just finished it. It was so worth the wait. I might just go to a theater and see it this weekend. Love the F-14 & always have.
Should have held this meeting in a bar at hapoy hour. They might have gotten more answers to their questions.
They would have gotten more answers. I don't know about good answers. But more answers.
I'm slapping my forehead during the scene when they're trying to replay that video clip. No one thought to create the slo-mo version of that clip or use video software with frame-by-frame capability
They used VLC and it is perfectly capable of both playing in slow motion and step frame by frame, hint: the arrow keys is your friends...
@@haqvor Indeed, and yet the presenters were clueless. It was painful to watch them trying to show the audience WTF was on the screen. I wouldn't have been as polite as those congressmen. Whatever it was appears in 2 frames or something on a crappy cell phone. Why present that? They should have just used of any military footage
@@loublackvideo The purpose of presenting the phone video was to make the point that this is the level of data they often are trying to analyze. That said, the presentation of the video was very embassasing to watch. Once again my wife had to put up with me yelling at cspan.
@@jrrarglblarg9241 LOL. My wife would have yell at me to turn off CSPAN
I’d be interested to hear you interview Chris Lehto on the subject.
Thanks Mooch
26:45. "Derivative and farcical", Mr. Ward as a citizen of the state of Illinois I would like to apologize to everyone who listened to our D Rep. try to sound intelligent while failing miserably.
It's expected behavior at this point.
Spend 50 million on a plane, but can't buy a "how to use video program" for staffers at 5.95 at Walmart. Government for you!
The military uses thermal imaging which detects heat and not the object. It'll never be clear at long ranges. Aircraft from an heads on perspective look like flying saucers with thermal imaging.
At the same time, someone who's incapable of taking a video in a properly watchable format is allowed to fly an aircraft... :D
Take your heart medicine, gramps, laptop trackpads suck.
@@CorePathway Yeah. Been cursing my self many times during a presentation cause I just tried to bite a bit more than I can chew when life throws the regular hick-ups at you. This might have been caused by a last minute decision: 'Hey can you download a few clips on your laptop to have some visuals to accompany the hearing?' That went all completely south when congress suddenly want to go into detail of that 'last minute' visual aid. Could have been resolved by asking for a few minutes for someone to prepare some clippings, or to promise to send a proper report later, but heat of the moment.
Some pretty wild stuff out there
Given how the Hornet crew were positioning the camera to catch the UFO, it was either making repeated passes at them, or they had warning it was coming. There's no way the flight crew would probably even see that thing given how fast it was going and how small it was.
Except radar works at the speed of light and picks up faster objects more easily than slow ones. Additionally some radar systems work at ranges of 100nm+ so yeah, they would definitely know it was coming and from which direction.
@@92HazelMocha Exactly what I was hinting at. Namely that either an AWACS or ground radar saw that thing coming and coordinated with the aircrew. That event is probably well documented. Not to mention implied intent of what the bogey was doing. It was coming from behind the Hornet at very very high speed. Guarantee the RADAR operators thought it was some sort of missile tracking on the Hornet. RADAR, EWOs, and air crew were probably in a total tizzy on that encounter.
@@AndrewTubbiolo in one of the events they had previous reports in a particular area. On the day of the intercept they were given vectors to the object so yes, radar (or other) had already picked it up.
I want to know about the underwater sensors. Not so much locations and capabilities but have they found stuff that can’t be explained? They were quick to shut that down with “that’s in the classified briefing.”
SOSUS is still Top Secret, I guess.
It's a classified briefing because the *sensors* are classified, and their locations. You don't discuss them in the open, to not give any useful information to an adversary.
"Loose lips sink ships." You'd think members of the intelligence committee would know that. 🙄
Even Russian has a version of SOSUS, as do many other countries. While each is technologically different, the premise is the same.
@@pjhaebe Ahh, yes but the Russian sensors have big underwater speakers dropped beside them that endlessly belt out Barry Manilow"s Greatest Hit in a continuous loop
@@EdwardRLyons "It's a classified briefing because the sensors are classified, and their locations. You don't discuss them in the open, to not give any useful information to an adversary."
They have underwater sonar data of the Tik Tok. That was NOT in a classified area and sonar isn't classified (the speed of the craft underwater was measured and released publicly), so there is no excuse to not at least partially answer those questions in the public meeting.
Muddy waters for sure, and that's all that's been 'clarified' by the hearing.Speaking of hearing, I can hear them loud and clearly NOT saying some number of things. I can't hear what they are, but for sure whatever it is, saying it out loud is not gonna happen amy time soon.
i have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass, and i'm all outa bubblegum
As I watch this it makes me wonder what major top secret aerospace project they are trying to distract us from?
The one that's going to get Pooden right off his miles long table in a very special operation ;)
Amazing!..the apparent lack of information the experts are wiling to clearly state. That's why it's left to us to do so, as I described my own siting on the radio again last week.
Is the 1,500+ page UAP report available? If so, where can we download it? Thanks.
Interesting! Thanks for the breakdown. 🤔 PS. Not being familiar with US Congress proceedings, what's the role of the little clock? Is there a time limit on questioning and/or answering?
Good question. Yes there are time limits.
Yes to both question and answering.
From the blue book: There was a disk up in the air, a silver disk that was not there. Two more where not there, again today, oh how I wish they'd go away.
@Amy taylor Hi That was sweet of you to ask. Thank you, And your little girl.
Oh my gosh ARROW KEYS and SPACEBAR please! Hahaha
Portions of this are a fine example of why you can not trust the government.
When you said after the first hour of the meeting didn’t go well, it reminded me of someone that would ask the question “was it bigger than a bread box”, the good news both sides of the committee seemed genuinely interested. If we spend a lot of money on stealth projects, perhaps we could spend some of that towards a new type of detection system from DARPA or something like it otherwise aren’t we just scratching are heads and guessing?
Interesting!
It's almost exactly 50 years since I was born.. that's a little bit creepy
Bad joke aside.. it must be crushing for a professional pilot to testify in any of these mysterious situations.
You should look up the ufos that were seen over the capital/Washington DC in the 1950s. There's a general that talks about this phenomenon. He stated this phenomenon has been around for a long time.
@@R281 I saw roger stone a few days ago, with a few evangelists, who probably used that picture to claim demonic portals over DC..
I'm not sure if they are just making fun of it, or if they really want to use it seriously.
What I'm saying is, it will unfortunately be used for any means, that they can think of. And that will most certainly spark some scepticism, and not the best type of scepticism too.
@@citizenVader they scrambled jets, so they probably showed up on radar. Who knows what they really are.
Quick question. How did you get the call sign of Mooch?
He has a video about it.
So glad to see Congress is going after important problems facing the nation.
Having been interested in UFO’s now called UAP’s it’s always struck me as the hight of arrogance to just dismiss these sightings. Ed Victory, USAF Veteran. Great contest BTW!
That was interesting how night vision can make a triangle shape with aircraft lights. The strobe light gave it away.
An an enlisted person there is only one burning question in my mind: If they come out and announce that flying saucers are real, do we get a day off?
no, you get double duty
If you're an American serviceman or woman, you get a freakin' medal ... maybe two.
These two have their careers on the line...they are doing their best to run the clock out with could be's and not aware of that answers. Data and dataset is the catch all answer; the default ball control/punt playbook to let the game end in a tie...just don't lose the game by saying something interesting.
4:27 "I bid $5 Bob!"
"There are things that we don't know we don't know."
I had always heard that Project Bluebook was an attempt to debunk sightings. I don't believe that these two guys can be at such high level, and "appear" not to know about these other sightings.
The Wilson documents got read into this hearing. Your viewers need to look that one up. Admiral Wilson and Dr Davis how a meeting about this topic. Cracks me up.
May the force be with you, 👽👾👿💀👀.
We have amazing ground, air, and satellite capabilities, the idea that they show up with a couple blurry clips seems super sus.
Mooch, you need to take a look at not just the Malmstrom (Bob Salas) case-and there have been many reports of UFOs in the Malmstrom missile fields over the years, but also a case from Minot AFB on 24 Oct 68, where both missile maintenance personnel and a B-52 crew that was airborne on a training mission encountered an unknown: they even had contact with the bogey on the Buff's radar!
Two other cases of note: the famous Tehran chase on 19/20 Jul 76, involving the IIAF with two F-4Es and an unidentified object that not only had extreme speed and maneuverability, but ECM that jammed just about ALL of the systems on one of the F-4s. Then there's the RB-47H case from 17 Jul 57, where a SAC RB-47 was followed for 700 miles across four states by an unidentified object that emitted its own radar signals, signals that were picked up by the RB-47's ELINT equipment. There was visual contact by the flight crew (Pilot, Co-Pilot, and Nav, radar from both a ground station and the RB's own onboard radar, and the ELINT signals that were recorded.
The growth of this channel is an unexplained aerial phenomenon.
In my opinion, it's One giant step for the Nations Security Concerns as a whole. As far as other Issues go ' Well, it's better than Nothing ', However, with regards to the incident that Congressman Krishnamurti brought up, that is a huge National Security Concern and National Security Apparatus and D.O.D. is leaving me with the Impression that they are ' Hitting the Snooze Button on their Alarm Clock because they don't want to get out of bed and go to work '. To me that's rather disturbing and it does tend to make me feel like I was Safer on The U.S.S. Portland when I was deployed to the Persian Gulf with SBU-24 during Desert Shield/Desert Storm. The Only really good upside to what I'm seeing in that it gives me a line of lyrics for a Parody Song I'm working on.
I will say at the outset I do not believe we are the only life in the universe intelligent or otherwise.
That begs the question is why would a species capable of interstellar travel want anything to do with us. It would be like us being able to build spacecraft capable of interstellar travel and go 100s or 1000s of light-years to have a conversation with a bug.
We have nothing offer such a species.
I don't think that they are interested in us. They may be interested in any resources that this planet has or they are doing research.
Bugs are pretty cool. And hey, we built the James Webb Telescope! We're pretty smart bugs.
@@jenicaepp That has been brought up a lot but any resources a species would need is available in space without coming to an inhabited planet. For instance, we are going to mine water on the moon for the proposed moon base at Shackleton crater, mainly because we've found water ice there.
Any mineral, element, or compound needed is seen everywhere we look in space. The asteroids alone would be more than enough.
And back to point of being able to cover interstellar distances, light-years, one would assume they have taken care of all their needs.
As to doing research, the question to me is why. That's a little bit of projection as it's what humans do a lot of. Not enough if you ask me.
Why show yourself this why if you just having a look. If capable of getting here across many light-years why pock your head like this.
@@drewletchworth9895 Smart to ourselves but to a species maybe a few thousand years more advanced? No. THe JWST is an amazing instrument and I can't wait to see the data it gathers but, these visitors, if real, traveled 100s or 1000s of light-years. To them, the JWST would even be an idle curiosity.
@@JustaPilot1 They do monitor what we are doing and I think that they may also be concerned with nuclear missiles causing some type of disturbance in the universe. They seem to be interested in our military bases and nuclear weapons program. They might be monitoring our evolution and technological advancement. They are here for a reason and their visits are purposeful. I don't think we are advanced enough for them to pop in for a cup of tea at this point. Maybe in the future. I also think that they do abduct people every now and then to take tissue samples and study us as we would research and study other animal species ect... I don't think that they are much different than we are. They have social structures, families, leaders, jobs ect.... I have studied the UFO topic for a long time and learned a lot from some leading experts in the field...but I don't buy into conspiracy theories ect...
have you been playing dcs?? i am really curious as to what you think about the f14 in the game. if it is actually accurate or not and how good you are compared to a normal sim player haha
somehow I feel that Congress has more important things to focus upon.
How can it not be aliens? This goes back to the 40s. Did China have this tech in the 40s 😂
So they had a 1972 hearing about👽?News to me!
How can he say that sphere, we have no data if it’s in control or not? What’s he thinking someone has a rocket arm and tossed it in the air? Wtf is going on
Omg, they are SO _incompetent_ when it comes to VLC.
Do you think I could apply for a job, even though I'm not a US citizen?
(from a NATO country though)
That video of the 'domed cylinder' zipping past the Hornet really stands out to me. How fast is that Hornet going, 250 kts? That object zipping past is easily going 3X or 4X that speed. So call it 750 kts or more. No sonic boom, no obvious propulsion? Say the Hornet was going 400 kts, then that cylinder was going like 1200 kts. That's 1400 mph. Heat is starting to become an issue. if that cylinder is going any faster you're starting to look at plasma balls that deep into the atmosphere.
Thankyou im glad im not the only one who noticed this. Im sure they have aswell but dont wanna say it in the public briefing
The triangle on the night vision vid is just a plane, flashing its navigation/marker lights, the other one from the cockpit is a weather balloon
Thats what they want you to believe. I saw one of these events in 1992 on the USS Thomas S Gates. There were five of these triangles surrounding our ship. Just hanging out. Not moving, just hovering, nothing on Radar, nothing visual when not looking through NVG’s, clear skies at night in the Persian Gulf. The only Helicopters around our ship was the ones we had onboard from HSL-44. In fact Iran through a fit blaming the US for strange lights going into their airspace. It wasn’t us.
My 2 cents is that what these pilots are seeing is an advanced stage development of the Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle (EKV) or the Multiple Kill Vehicle (MKV). The uncharacteristic flight parameters and the size of the objects would suggest as such. It wouldn’t surprise me at all if these UAPs have US Air Force painted on the side of them.
That or it has a CCP symbol on the side, all parts say “made in China, stolen from USA”. That’s the part they should really worry about.
A few whistleblowers have come forward that were on the ships in the video and have stated that when looking at the craft with their own eyes they were triangle.
Cmdr. Carroll, sir; Thank you for your continued selfless stalwart and steadfast devotion and service to this nation.
If I may call you "Mooch", sir. Got a question you might be able to answer. Would Ed Harris' character on Top Gun: Maverick,the Rear Admiral (Upper Half) be the James Token's "Stinger" character just without Mr. Token? It seems that the character (Harris) follow the same as "Stinger's"? Could that be possible?
We live in weird times
What is your opinion of all the video evidence of the triangular aircraft that people call the tr3b?
Is the triangle image not a TR3B??
I think so too