SpaceX Canceled S30 Firing, What Wrong? Weird S26 Moved, Starliner New Launch Date
Vložit
- čas přidán 23. 06. 2024
- SpaceX Canceled S30 Firing, What Wrong? Weird S26 Moved, Starliner New Launch Date
===
00:00 - 03:51: S30 test scrub
03:52 - 05:34: S26 move
05:35 - 07:43: Starliner’s new schedule
07:44 - 09:51: Rocket Lab's new rocket plan
===
#greatspacex #elonmusk #spacex #nasa #starship
===
Advertisers who want to place ads on our channel, please contact the email manager: smanager339@gmail.com
===
SpaceX Starship SN
Be the first to sponsor us Thank you.
www.patreon.com/GreatspaceX?f...
Our video content is referenced by video sources at these sites:
HUGE THANKS TO:
LabPadre Space: / labpadre
/ labpadre
StarshipGazer: / starshipgazer
/ starshipgazer
John Cargile: / groundtruthpics
WAI: / @whataboutit
/ felixschlang
Ryan Hansen Space: / ryanhansenspace
/ ryanhansenspace
Lewis Knaggs: / @lewisknaggs
/ lewisknaggs42
Christian Debney: / christiandebney
/ @christiandebney1989
Robossbomb: / robossbomb
czcams.com/channels/ViT.html...
spaceflightnow.com/2024/05/08...
spacenews.com/rocket-lab-push...
===
SpaceX Canceled S30 Firing, What Wrong? Weird S26 Moved, Starliner New Launch Date
It seems like there was a setback with the S30 static fire test scheduled for yesterday. Preparations for Flight 5 are still ongoing, with the static fire test being a crucial step in the process. SpaceX had received a 12-hour road closure schedule for May 7, along with backup dates on May 8 and 9, indicating their intent to complete the test promptly.
SpaceX Canceled S30 Firing, What Wrong? Weird S26 Moved, Starliner New Launch Date.
However, despite the vigorous pace of preparations, the test did not proceed as planned. The fuel loading process began around 11:23 a.m., during which frost lines appeared indicating the presence of fuel. However, the frost lines did not rise as expected, and about 30 minutes later, they disappeared entirely, signaling an issue. Subsequently, the venting and detanking process took place, suggesting that the test could not be conducted as scheduled.
SpaceX Canceled S30 Firing, What Wrong? Weird S26 Moved, Starliner New Launch Date.
It appears that SpaceX made a second attempt at the static fire test around 3:00 p.m. During this attempt, the fuel loading process commenced again, and frost lines appeared as expected, indicating the presence of fuel. This time, the process seemed to progress more robustly, with signs of full fuel loading observed around 15 minutes and 46 seconds into the process. Subsequently, the engine chill process began, accompanied by venting at the leg of the test stand, indicating preparations for engine activation.
---
We use images and content in accordance with the CZcams Fair Use copyright guidelines: czcams.com/users/intlen/about...
Any questions about copyright please send us via Gmail: colonbina25@gmail.com
To be resolved, thank you. - Věda a technologie
Posting this on the morning of the 8th, four hours before the successful S30 static fire is just weird. I mean why?
Sounds like they need to change the spark plugs on S30, obviously. Where's my wrench.....
It's probably a bad capacitor. It's always the capacitor.
@@Dropides LOL. Good One. Maybe it's the ball bearings.
Maybe points and condenser.
Maybe the clutch is bad
I can give you my wrench to change the valve on Boeing
With several rockets under different completion stages and testing, really need an updated list showing status of the various rockets,S28,29,30, 31,32, etc plus similar for Boosters.
Thanks for your suggestion. We'll take note this ☺️
Great vid, Kevin.
♥️♥️♥️
um sir, we can hear some background noise sounds like a toy and some excess noises pls find and ultra quiet area
Kevin I have to chuckle every time you mention New Glenn. It looks like New Glenn is someones pipe dream.
😂😂😂
Great Episode. Concerning the Starliner. So in realty how many valves need to be replaced. Was it a new valve? Do you think they should check the wiring again. The Atlas Rocket is an old rocket design. I though they retired that rocket and were going to use a Blue Origin BE-4. What happened to that? The booster rockets are old Russian rockets that are no longer made. How do feel about that? I'd like to hear more about Rocket Lab's rocket test when you get the data. It looks cumbersome. Great Episode, Kev. Have a Great Day.
Great analysis, bro. Thanks for your great support. Keep following and discussing on our channel ☺️
@@colonbina1 I will Kev. Love your channel.
Yesterday day of scrubs, Atlas V AV 085 Starliner CFT scrub, Starship SN30 static fire test scrub. Hope today will not scrubs Falcon 9 and Starship.
😂😂😂, these may be a sign for the upcoming active period
Must be some sort of social engineering by NASA pressing SPACE X due to failure launch of Boeing Starliner Capsule to the ISS . Weak. There is a big difference between a static test of Space X from actual mission to ISS. Weak.
Posting it on the morning of the 8th, four hours before the successful S30 static fire was also a bit ironic.
Up, Up and Away!
🚀🚀🚀
ULA - ОПА (Объединенный Пусковой Альянс)
👍👍👍
Yes
Have a nice day, bro🤗
I think S26 is just a GSE, and ship test for all new structures. They would've flown it by now... Or is a Tanker. don't knw the payload infrastructure?
The SF was short and clean. Gotta remember its a new spot for static.
Also, Zilla was purging its veins to get ready to rock. 2 weeks, and we will be back up in the air (unless the FAA sits on there hands again).
Let's wait for SpaceX's updates on this prototype
Now officially RocketLab, will not apply for a license to launch a Neutron rocket this year. In my opinion, the application will be submitted no earlier than the 1st quarter of 2025.
Yeah, let's wait for their next plans. We truly eager to see this rocket compete with Falcon 9, Vulcan, New Glenn and Starship
The tanker system
Several stuck open tank vent relief valves... 🤣😂😁
Look at shark's shape, make starship similar! Or give it wide skids, change its bottom (belly) and make it more flat.
Sharks move through water. Starships move through atmosphere and vacuum. I checked and water is significantly more dense than the others. Most engineering aspects are done with consideration of production technique and maximizing structural performance. A cylindrical structure has proven the best in regards to both of these. Do you also propose we make square baseballs?
When is starship 4 test
I think this will be ramp up soon, maybe right in the next week
Anyone else surprised by NASA scrubbing the mission? 60 years and they are still using high priced, low quality parts. Gotta love government run programs.
SpaceX will change everything ☺️
It is not surprise but NASA should have been aware that the higher percentage of failure of a mission after a global pandemic where the majority of people were LAID OFF.
🎉
Have a nice day 🤗
3:50 what are thise random hammering noises? 😅
😂😂😂
When de-tanking what is coming out from the OLM?
HELLO MAHAL❤ELON AMPO I KO NGA MANGATO TA DUHA SA LANGIT NAA DIDTO TANAN IMONG KALIPAY NGA WALANG HANGGANAN NAA DIDTO TANAN IMONG KAYAMANAN MAHAL PALANGING LAB LAB KAAYONG HONEY DARLING❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Elon Musk - he can!
🚀🚀🚀
What evidence you have? better shut up!
Elon, I see you don't understand how the shape of the starship affects its safety during reentry. Structural changes is a must. My advice is please think about the starship as about a boat, landing on the surface of water with extreme speed. You shouldn't have arc shape of the Starship's bottom (belly). This is not a barrel. It tends to rotate because of arc bottom, as if it was a barrel landing on the surface of water with extreme speed. It will not swim smoothly, it will constantly rotate, as it was during the last landing. The bottom part (belly) of the starship body should be flat, as the bottom part of any boat is. Did you see NASA solutions? Wings of Challenger? Their solution was flat bottom. Slide, not dive. Starship is "landing" on the surface of the atmosphere, as a boat on water. The atmosphere to the vehicle with speed 40000km/h has consistency of water to the boat. Reentry is similar to swimming across the surface of the atmosphere, and should last as long as the speed will slow down in a natural way, due to friction. Don't push Starship to dive into atmosphere. What you expect is that a barrel with speed 40000 km/h will smoothly enter deep water. No way! It will rotate, jump, it will dive and jump, and constantly rotate, as it was the last time. This is why all steering features were broken, they were too weak for such an endeavor. When you make the starship (means a barrel) flat from the "bottom" (belly), it would be much easier to put tiles on the flat surface, maybe make a kind of "keel" to make the starship more steady, and starship will smoothly enter deeper parts of the atmosphere as the result. You have time, do not hurry, starship must slide over the upper part of the atmosphere, give it time, and make it more like a boat, not a barrel. Structural changes!
I really hope elon feels atleast a little stupid for being rude about the boeing abort the other day
That was not my impression from the tweets read
Was this Karma for mouthing off about the valve shutting down Boeing launch?
This is a Chinese sponsored site and watching it subjects you to Chinese propaganda. This site, Tech Map, and others like it.
If this is China, they spend a lot of effort to show us HOW MUCH BETTER SpaceX is at ANYTHING SPACE as compared to dogEaterChina and their mentally challenged space 'program'
....don't do drugs. 😅
@@jamesogden7756 This site (Tech Map), and the Great SpaceX site are both Chinese. They pick on Boeing for A REASON. Possibly the Chinese are sabotaging Boeing in general and the starliner project in particular. Quit watching this site and The Great SpaceX, and other unofficial sites as you are subject to Chinese propaganda. Watch yourselves, you are ignorant.
@@suburbangardenpermaculture3117 See how easy it was for this site to win you over. You don't worry about anything because you were raised a fool.
What makes ypu think this channel is Chinese lol?
This a lot of effort for some small hate on Boeing, but they love spacex? Why would China want that?
Spacex is the company accomplishing the most
Why not call it what it was VAB. Vehicles assembly building not VAF
VIF