Phone extraction expert testifies at trial of Samantha Woll's alleged Detroit killer - Part 2
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 09. 2024
- Sarah Markel, a Detroit police detective who does phone extractions within the homicide unit, testifies on Monday, June 24 at the trial of Samantha Woll's alleged killer. Michael Jackson-Bolanos is standing trial for murder and other charges in June in connection with the Oct. 21, 2023, stabbing of Woll at her Detroit home.
This lady's behavior is inappropriate and unprofessional. Regardless of your feelings on what you are being asked, have some decorum! And maybe buy a pen so you can take some notes when doing your job. Hopefully the jury took notice of her ridiculous behavior!
Spot on assessment
@@krista2kaia very well said 🫶🏽
If the defense attorney was defending you, would you think he's proving doubt in this case? I think you would appreciate his fighting for you. She understands exactly what he's asking her.
Hell yes if God Forbid I was in the defendant’s shoes that I would be so lucky to have that man.. he’s amazing tearing apart this entire ridiculous prosecution.
Likely pulling teeth to get the witness to be honest
This lady should be fired. Lying to convict an innocent man. Disgusting.
Giving off amber heard vibes 😂
This lady acted drunk - she was loopy AF
She’s corrupt, not drunk.
Never thought I’d have to watch an entitled Karen phone extractor in a murder trial. Guess there’s a first time for everything. Smh
Is this woman supposed to be an expert? There’s a man’s life at risk. Everyone in law enforcement/public safety should want to do an exhaustive search for the truth.
She’s covering the truth as instructed. Even when asked if she found it strange that on the day of the murder they were unable to detect the phone location of the ex-boyfriend she replied ‘no.’ And same when asked about his phone having no activity on the day Samantha was murdered. You don’t need to be a phone expert to know that is not only odd but unbelievable.
The witness wanted to laugh so hard to the defence lawyers dizzy questions
His questions aren't dizzy. She knows exactly what he's asking her. He's creating reasonable doubt in this case. You should hope to have an attorney like him to fight for you if needed.
The defense attorney is proving that she cherry picked information from the extracted phone data. She couldn't correspond between which apps were accessed and the peripheral (physical hand usage) activity from the end user. She glossed over the ADT security app that can be used to turn off/on or modify the house security alarm. He also shows that even though she is a smart phone expert he cannot verify if the ex boyfriend deliberately turned off his GPS location or turned his phone off at the time of the murder. The prosecutor is only going off of phone pings to the radio tower nearby but not analyzing in depth the end user's interaction with the phone itself.
Wow. I think every ‘potential’ prosecution witness should document ALL critical steps….like when the phone was put into airplane mode. Such an easy process and noe there’s doubt.
the ex-boy friend refusing to return her key and admitting to killing her means nothing? you want them to convict this car thief while the jew who killed her watches on TV?
@@nunyabiz1780WELL SAID AND I AGREE 10000%
Listening thru this again - she is so evasive - it’s frustrating to watch. Someone on the defense team needs to learn more about this software so he can properly cross.
Wayne county criminal systems is sad. No body knows nothing. Peoples in Wayne pay attention
Like lady don't give af she just get her check and go to the bar
She’s infuriating. Go home rich Jewish lady. You’re not smart enough to use a phone let alone analyze one
Defense attorney reminds me of Darryl Brooks Wakasha Christmas parade perpetrator. Voice and demeanor and even what he looked like before he cut his hair with the dreads.
The voice is a match for sure, but Darryl’s locs were never that thick and healthy😂
She can’t keep a straight face. She answered the prosecution perfectly then the defence it’s mmmm sort of, aaaaaa yesss, mmmmm no trying to confuse the attorney
Everything can be used as evidence to make you guilty
Why do you think it's called 'evidence'?
thumbs up to the defense attorney! he's fighting his heart out. maybe a haircut?