Germans vs British Flames of War Battle Report Ep 3
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 11. 2022
- Anthony from Battlefront Miniatures is back, this time we're showcasing the new British Bulge box set that includes new plastic kits. Luka will be bringing the Germans to test their mettle.
Get your miniatures commission painted by Siege Studios
siegestudios.co.uk/
Support MWG by adding some Ravaged Star miniatures to your collection here: gamefound.com/projects/miniwa...
MWG Silver Vault members gain access to discount codes from terrain and miniatures companies featured in this battle report here: www.miniwargaming.com/vault/s...
Additional gratitude goes out to the following companies who have sent us free product featured in this video:
Gale Force 9 - www.gf9.com - Hry
Nice! Thanks. I like the way it plays
So Excited to see the Kangaroos. Cant wait to get a few boxes for Rams and Kangaroos for my own British (Canadian) Force.
Nice to see some FoW
Nice
Great game! The losing side had an absurdly fragile formation! I guess it's realistic but I'd try to build something a bit more resilient.
Can unit do more than one Movement Order (Blitz, etc) per turn in FoW? You can't do it in Team Yankee....
Americans correctly pronouncing hornisse challenge: Impossible
Why does an ostwind AA gun have an AT of 7? It has no business shooting at AFVs
its 40mm... they made ap rounds for it. Historically there is reason.
Tell that to my Archers.
@@MrCopenhagen113 Do you happen to have a source or link to point me towards for this? I'm interested in reading about it
@@SuperHalberd they would of been tungsten tipped. And I need to make the correction that it was a 3.7 cm gun. But that 3.7 cm was a modification of the 3.7cm PaK 36, same as the BK 3.7cm guns carried by stukas. Also interesting notes that about 20% of early war t34s and alot of other soviet light armor would of been destroyed by said 3.7cm guns, so I feel it's safe to say that an ostwind with its hvap rounds would of torn through atleast allied light tanks.
@@MrCopenhagen113 That seems reasonable. Thank you for the explaination