CLEAN LINES, OPEN SPACES A VIEW OF MID CENTURY MODERN ARCHITECTURE Full Version
Vložit
- čas přidán 23. 07. 2024
- CLEAN LINES, OPEN SPACES: A VIEW OF MID-CENTURY MODERN ARCHITECTURE international-style architecture
Modern architecture or modernist architecture is a term applied to an overarching movement, with its exact definition and scope varying widely.[1] The term is often applied to modernist movements at the turn of the 20th century, with efforts to reconcile the principles underlying architectural design with rapid technological advancement and the modernization of society. It would take the form of numerous movements, schools of design, and architectural styles, some in tension with one another, and often equally defying such classification.[1] The term Modern architecture may be used to differentiate from Classical architecture following Vitruvian ideals, while it is also applied to various contemporary architecture styles such as Postmodern, High-tech or even New Classical, depending on the context. In art history, the revolutionary and neoclassical styles that evolved around 1800 are also called modern.
The concept of modernism is a central theme in the efforts of 20th century modern architecture. Gaining global popularity especially after the Second World War, architectural modernism was adopted by many architects and architectural educators, and continued as a dominant architectural style for institutional and corporate buildings into the 21st century. Modernism eventually generated reactions, most notably Postmodernism which sought to preserve pre-modern elements, while "Neo-modernism" has emerged as a reaction to Post-modernism.
Notable architects important to the history and development of the modernist movement include Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Le Corbusier, Walter Gropius, Erich Mendelsohn, Frank Lloyd Wright, Louis Sullivan, Gerrit Rietveld, Bruno Taut, Arne Jacobsen, Oscar Niemeyer and Alvar Aalto.
Common themes of modern architecture include:
the notion that "Form follows function", a dictum originally expressed by Frank Lloyd Wright's early mentor Louis Sullivan, meaning that the result of design should derive directly from its purpose
simplicity and clarity of forms and elimination of "unnecessary detail"
materials at 90 degrees to each other
visual expression of structure (as opposed to the hiding of structural elements)
the related concept of "Truth to materials", meaning that the true nature or natural appearance of a material ought to be seen rather than concealed or altered to represent something else
use of industrially-produced materials; adoption of the machine aesthetic particularly in International Style modernism, a visual emphasis on horizontal and vertical lines
Kind regards
-----------------------------------------------------
Architect Ib Conlon
Managing Director + Principal Architect
M.Arch(UTS) B.A Arch(UTS) ADAD(CIT)
Architect NSW Registration No. 10042
M: 0404459916
E: ibrahim@iscdesign.com.au
W; www.iscdesign.com.au
This is a wonderful brilliantly produced, you should be very proud of it. It's fascinating to watch and I have watched it many times.
Only very few people understand the beauty, simplicity and elegance of modern/mid-century design...
Хуршед Рахмон hipsters
It's soulless.
Yes, a box is beautiful in it's own way but there are things infinitely more beautiful than a box.
Our ancestors are laughing at us
Is this a joke? It's mainstream for long fucking time.
Totally agree.
This was a great film. Thank you for posting.
thankyou for watching and appreciating the 'story' of mid century modern
Great documentary, reminds me of many buildings and houses.
Fantastic documentary. Thanks for sharing!
I enjoyed this documentary. I only wish that they had talked a little bit more about my favorite Arkansas architect, E. Fay Jones. He was an AIA award winning architect that designed some of the best mid century modern and post modern structures in Arkansas.
Who ever heard of of any architect or project of note that came out of UA. I certainly didn't and I attended one of the top schools of architecture from 1954-1959 and was steeped in the international style and worked for Phillip Johnson.
wonderful . really> you worked with Philip. I would like to hear more
I don't think there are many truly beautiful skyscrapers of taller buildings. Once you are too far removed from the human scale they all look unnaturally gangly and alienate humans. I am not a huge fan of the international style and Le Corbusier for that matter. But Mid century modern homes (did anyone count how many times they used that phrase?) got it right.
www.travel-pictures-gallery.com/usa/new-york-w2/new-york-w2-0114.html
Congratulations you have been joyously disproven.
great video! thanks for sharing!
thankyou for watching
I enjoyed this documentary a lot,🙏 thank you for sharing it. I wonder if this was a one time program about this style of architecture or if it was a series of shows explaining other styles as well 🙋 thanks
thankyou for watching
Although they mid century modern architecture makes me feel sick and it looks dead, I definitely do absolutely love love the decor and furniture of this era
Many people that have lived in such modern buildings went back to living in a normal colonial-type house with open spaces but also closed bedrooms
Yes the concept of 'privacy' is one that needs constant understanding
@BenkethePirate Yes but even McMansions are preferable.
So what's post mid century modern? I've been to the Bauhaus Museum in Germany.
Mid century modernism gave way to the bland 70s and into the Post modern. The history and story of architecture continues naturally. As Architects we are forever questioning our position & principles to achieve an architecture that makes sense and responds to the EPOCH of our time.
Could someone explain further about Raisian style (not sure how it is spelled) as mentioned in 27:10? Thanks
Wrightian I'm guessing since they mentioned "it's place in the landscape" and that was one of Frank Lloyd Wrights signatures.
In other words, the international style was socialist architecture. I find it interesting how many famous architects and designers were socialists. Ex: Frank Lloyd Wright, Corbusier, and Norman Bel Geddes. Just to name a few.
SELF-RuELIANCE and a STRONG COMMUNITY ever Kuty
SELF-RELIANCE and a STRONG COMMUNITY How is the international style socialist? New York is full of international styled buildings and its probablly the most known capitalist city.
what does the place that a building is in have to do with the style of the building being socialist conceptually or not? If the architect showed Socialistic tendencies and expressed those beliefs in his architecture, everything outside that building could still remain capitalistic. Although land prices have almost always been capitalistic except maybe for homesteading. Many modernist homes were built to provide affordable housing using off the shelf materials, simple designs without using unneeded materials which add cost just to be more ornate, and prototype designs that could be mass produced making them cheaper for the average joe. The Case Study homes are an example. I am not sure people use Socialist in a negative way all the time.
27:09 I was trying to read more about a certain architect style, (I can’t spell the name so- riten?) But I can find anything on google. What should I be searching?
'Wrightian' (pertaining to the architectural 'principles' (not style) of Frank Lloyd Wright
IbrahimSiddiqConlon Thank You!
🙋🙋🙋
Architecture Ethic and Architecture Style are two different things. Two persons could have similar style but at the same time pursue different ideas.
thats true, Mies and Frank Lloyd Wright both have similar architecture style but have a different approach in design.
I watched this whole documentary hoping to better appreciate mid-century modern because, as they say here, it is kinda "hip" again. The major flaw with "function over form" is that you have ugly buildings that functioned really well when they were first built. However, as needs change you simply have an ugly building that's not as usable as it once was. Without an aesthetic appeal to warrant saving it, most will probably meet the wrecking ball.
there is no accounting for taste.
just my thoughts.
Well that is an interesting pint of view and certainly every point f view is important to us, as architects.
@@ISCDESIGNAustralia Old brick and mortar building age like wine too. They remain beautiful even as ruins. When a modern building becomes a ruin. It becomes a mess of sharp edges, broken glass and rusted steel. It looks like a hostile environment before and after it becomes a ruin.
Mid century modern architecture, besides materials actually took many of its ideas from traditional Japanese architecture.
Yes you can say this
How could you talk about Modern architecture without even mentioning Frank Lloyd Wright?
Jane Obersat @27:20 Minuten
do u have sub for this
subtitles? try the original; czcams.com/video/yqB_sl3xnmM/video.html
@23:00 Everybody thinks they are a designer.
How architecture talks jet.net.ua/category/architecture/
That link is broken. Can you help me find the article?
damn the amount of pretentious accents in this documentary(very good one)
wow amazing house
sandy kinnee original art
www.ebay.com/itm/252799948613
50 years from now people will want to tare down modern architecture buildings to build something beautiful in it's place.
This video goes to show you that just because someone is an architect or a professor of architecture doesn't necessarily mean they have any artistic vision or taste in the least. How anyone can defend such soulless structures is beyond me. Thanks to the modern architects we live much of our lives in a utilitarian environment devoid of warmth, soul, and beauty.
Villa Tugendhat, one of the first Mieses work is one of the most visited building in Brno. You have to book visit two months before visiting.
Modern architecture is completely gross and tasteless. People don't realize the importance of having beautiful buildings and perhaps most of us are unaffected because we've never seen great, truly amazing architecture before. Don't believe me? Next time you're in your city, pay close attention to what the surrounding buildings make you feel. Petty? Small? Foreign? Sick? Can you honestly say "wow, this makes me proud to be a human, what a work of art- a true feat of engineering"?
Your perspective is limited. Perhaps with time and knowledge you'll come to appreciate what the different subsets of modern architecture have to offer by way of freedom. There's a reason those to the right of the bell curve get these designs commissioned you know ;)
My city is very old, and has many old buildings, but was also hit by the modernist wave of the cold war :( It is among the old buildigns which are small and made of wood, and the cobblestone streets, where I feel peaceful and not tense, and where I grasp the fresh air and enjoy my surroundigns. I feel happiness. Modern architecture just gives me headaches.
Yyy
because because because
FYI, Frank Lloyd Wright didn't like the International style so how can you say he was a Socialist? He loved America and believed in a democracy and even developed and designed a new American architecture called the Prairie homes and Usonian homes for example. Obviously you are not well versed in FLLW. Hiwever, if I am wrong then may God strike me dead now. lol.
Wright was wrong. His designs were no more American than any other modern architect's. The home that embodied the real American style was, of course, the wigwam.
why do Americans look at socialism as a bad thing?
and saying he believed in democracy not socialism, you have no clue what either socialism or democracy means.
socialism is put simply caring about others.
American here. Socialism isn't caring about others. It's about forcefully taking other's private property under the guise of collectivist morality. It's authoritarianism with a smiley face. It's the complete opposite of freedom.
democracy is a system of government in which the citizens exercise power directly or elect representatives from among themselves to form a governing body, if you want freedom with no taxes you got to move to where there is no roads, public schools, hospitals or any form of help that is available for the public.
real socialism want everybody to contribute with a fair share, capitalist want the working class to pay for it all.
and if you get injured and unable to work, tough shit
good man:)
Понастроили дебильных аквариумов! Хрень собачья!
Copious Grope, Gropious Cope
There's nothing aesthetic about modern architecture. It makes me feel sick usually
boo hoo bitch
Old architecture, like Gregorian for example, is highly superior to what we make today.
what happened to the "everything is beautiful" thing?
@@BamberdittoPingpong yeah, they're really nice and admirable..but too much labor and high cost of labor, not practical now...
dude, why u so mad
IbrahimSiddiqConlon
let's be honest if buildings where just meant to be functional architecture would just be a waste of time and resources. The people before us (ancestors) where wise and they drew their wisdom from the accumulated experience of the ones before them (tradition and culture). This endless experimentation that disregards such virtues are pointless. It stops being about living well and it becomes about a false sense of prestige inside an insular corporate group mentality. It is a cynical attitude to take and shouldn't be regarded as progress.
It is a reasonable point-to believe in the prototype that has gone before us; But what the modern sought to do was liberate space, create modular structures that can be factory =mass produced. Holding onto antiquity for its sake is not good for progress. And that word 'progress' is what summed and sums up our modernity. For if it were not for such, we would be still living in dark brick Edwardian boxes and not free to see the sky, feel the breeze or 'touch the earth lightly' as we have done post modernity.
Rhythm balance theme scale, at the end of the day your building is ugly trash and has no use other than as a space
FORM follows FUNCTION was a phrase 'originally' spoken and written by Le Corbusier! And, no other 'Architect' had conspeculated this idea, before 2019 and after!
"FORM ever follows FUNCTION" Its a Phrase By Louis Sullivan. Don't post things that you don't know.
Bharath Raj For your info, I'm not just a youtuber who corrected it because I wanted to, I studied Architecture in Europe! and Le Corbusier is the Father of Architecture, and the Father of Modern Architecture, and we know NO AMERICANS that was so!
Names like Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Peter Behrens, and even, the Artist Henri Vandevelde were one of the PIONEERS of CUBISM and these movements: "Where your White House was still a PYRAMIDAL POINTED HOUSE and NOT A CUBE - house that you see in Europe!
You tell me now, that I'm the "snotnose" of Architecture, and that your "pea brained SULLIVAN is bigger that LE CORBUSIER???
STUPID STINKING INDIAN???
FUCK OFF DEAR!!!!
GO BACK WORSHIPPING YOUR STINKING COWS!!!
lol whut? A house is a machine for living in...
Yes, a house, or EARTH is a "machine" - it's a "vehicle" - dumbfkxcvbnkjhgklmx!