Scientists Hope That Their Discovery is a Mistake. What Did They See?
Vložit
- čas přidán 24. 06. 2024
- In this video, you'll find out: why is humanity a statistical fluke? Where is the center of the Universe? And why are scientists so concerned about the Axis of Evil?
#eldddir #eldddir_space #eldddir_earth #eldddir_tech #eldddir_jupiter #eldddir_mars
Ignoring a potential new discovery is never the way of science. Investigation and questions must always be the way for progress, no matter how inconvenient.
This isnt even real dude. Its just human pattern recognition running wild. Seeing something that isnt there because we want to see something ao bad. Ridddle shouldnt even be spreading this fairytale because its misleading.
Sounds like every movie where a scientist finally discovered it and the world is destroyed
lol, come on. Ignoring potential new discoveries has been the motto of modern physics for almost 100 years. Crud Newtonian physics breaks, could we have made a mistake.... naw let's just make up particle physics and keep going, Dang particle physics broke, do you think we might have made a mistake? Naw, let's just go with quantum physics. After a hundred years of so-called scientific advancement, we still have no way to reconcile all these branches of physics into one. Do you think maybe just maybe we should look back to when we broke physics the first time and see if we made a mistake? That's silly how could we have come so far if we had made a fundamental mistake at the beginning. Well, let's take a look at the technological advancements or REAL scientific break thoughts that have taken place since we broke Newtonian physics. Obviously, there must be hundreds if not thousands considering how advanced we have become compared to a hundred years ago....... right? Wrong, yes we have built onto the old technologies, we have increased our manufacturing processes and made things faster and smaller but yet you will find no new technologies or inventions that were created because of our understanding of particle physics or quantum physics. (Quantum comes the closest but only because even a broken clock is correct twice a day). Very interesting, so what mistake did we make a hundred years ago that we refuse to let go of that has completely halted true scientific advancement? Look no farther than the imaginary joke that is the photon particle-wave duality. If light is not a particle then by necessity an electron also can not be a particle. I ask any of you how much of our current understanding of the universe hinges on light being made of photons? When the main body of the scientific community accepted this false theory everything started falling apart, yet a hundred years later we refuse to consider the possibility we made a mistake. Modern science is an absolute shattered mess, so far gone that it can no longer provide explanations of what things truly are but instead is content with simplistic descriptions. Don't believe me "What is light", well its a particle-wave duality. A wave is a description of what something does not what something is. What is heat? What is a field? What is a negative charge? What is space? Try finding an answer to any of these questions that are actual explanations and not just weak observational descriptions. We stopped being able to understand what things truly are when we screwed up are understanding of light.
@Steve Kirkby in reality this data is not being ignored. This video is ignoring the facts, and misrepresenting scientists and the scientific consensus for views, likes, and comments.
hence: others (meaning gov, and non believers,) about global warming
As aggravating, even disheartening as a new discovery can be, you can’t just ignore science because it’s inconvenient to you. This axis is something that needs to be examined further because while it may absolutely disrupt everything, it will lead to more accurate and clarified views of our universe. It’s upsetting, but necessary.
Tell that to the Smithsonian and other similar organizations. They've hidden a bunch of stuff that's been discovered and doesn't fit the current narrative of how humans evolved and how far back we've known certain things.
Why disheartening? It is what it is. We should be thankful we are closer to the truth.
@@imadeyoureadthis1 disheartening for scientists who have based their entire careers or even lives around these theories. To think you are this much closer to understanding when in reality, you understand nothing and you were wrong all along. But you can’t sit there and angrily wish for your house to be built on more stable ground, you have to tear it down and start over. Ignoring science just prevents us from evolving forward.
@@hauntedmushroomsasmr7716 yup imagine for countless years we all believe the universe started after a bang to just now believing that the universe isnt homogeneous ......this is why we need to first off become woke too quantum physics even if this means rewriting the fundamentals...
Church: Hold my beer
I have heard it said " Scientists love to be proven wrong. If we are proven right we don't have as much to learn." I fully agree with that. I am glad when my knowledge is useful but I get excited when I am proven wrong.
What's wrong if God is discovered to be real? I mean im down for an after lifer bro. It's better than ceasing to exist. Don't you think?
@@GeovanniCastro666 Faith is a thing. It is central to belief systems. People keep wanting tangible proof of God but even scripture says that would undermine everything. Even if God were proven nothing scientifically ought to change because of it. But in that instance people would pretend to love God out of terror on a global scale and that is inimical to God's plan. Do you want monsters like pol pot, Stalin, Genesis Khan, and other violent, psychopath, genocidal evil monsters to be given eternal life (remember, eternity is in this physical universe, not some magically medieval cloud spirit dimension)? No. Not everyone is meant to live forever and that is fine.
Another issue here is agendas attached to scientists that are either paid by or controlled by or believe in some flawed pollitical crap that takes away real science no matter the reality or consequences. We are in a really sad part of history right now, we are being controlled, brainwashed, dumbed down and limited in so many ways, there are too many to count at this point. I don't see us making any species changing discoveries until we get our common sense, morals, and courage/backbone back
That's total BS. Scientists hate being proven wrong more than most people do. At least when it reaches this sort of level. If they're the ones that prove it wrong and find the "right" answer that's one thing, but having the principles on which they base their theories brought into serious doubt is rarely so well accepted. One great astrophysicist who contributed all kinds of major advancements in the understanding of stellar behavior spent a large part of his life trying to prove that the universe is infinite and had no beginning.
And as for God, I'm not holding my breath. Scientifically proving the existence of God or defining His nature would be like proving the existence of an author using nothing but grammar rules. God is by definition completely outside of all the rules and measurements we have, so it'd be a literal miracle if there was even a way to test whether He does or doesn't exist.
Yeah well, no reason it cant be terrifying AND fascinating. There... World peace restored :D
Basically, we're talking about what could be the anomaly that leads to the next Paradigm Shift. People sometimes throw the term around a lot to describe just about anything they think is an incredible advancement, but really "paradigm shift" refers to anomalous discoveries that, like the Axis of Evil, demand a change not just in theories but in the very definitions and understandings of what things are. Unlike what you'll often hear people describe as a "new paradigm", this is something that seriously wrecks a lot of stuff in order to rebuild it in a way that more accurately defines reality.
An issue that never brfore in history made proven totally wrong so much.
Technically, all physicians since mid 19th century have to admit that they are a bench of m*rons, who has no idea what they talked and talking about.
Somewhere from "paradigm shifting" idea of fields happen, permitting at last put electricity into some theory.
Though, this idea itself is quite approximative as basically it says "I have no idea why, but this works in this way"
So it's not space Nazis about to shoot us with orbital lasers? Sorry haven't watched the vid yet
Basically you say? What's the advanced explanation?
yeah things like the discovery of fire. people don't realize that this could be effectively the same thing as seeing the lightning strike that tree but in relation to FTL travel and stuff
@@jamescheddar4896 Technically, this discovery leads to assumption, that we actually don't know if fire and lightning is the same phenomena or not really. Bcs everything since Maxwell equations proves to be at least not that correct as we are thinking
wow, having to rethink 90% of our knowledge about space sounds like a good thing to me! It sounds like job opportunities just opened the barn doors in astrophysics, quantum physics, astronomy and all kinds of other heavy STEM fields.
And a lot of Astro engineering for large scale orbital construction. Cause we will need it for better images and information.
Construction of a space based telescope the size of a foot ball field should do it.
Except... no one actively pays for that. Academic science will have you working as an adjunct getting paid per class you teach at a rate that nets you around the same money that fast food worker would make. You're better off going into engineering or software than you are going into pure science -- unless you're already independently wealthy.
90% is far too much. we base so many things off of the speed of light this would be a horrendously bad thing to have happen.
@@thechatter7102 horrendously bad thing is having a theoretical model based on wrong assumptions and not trying to fix it. Yes it would be tedious but it would benefit humanity. We will have to wait and see if this thing truly exists.
I wonder if this means Einstein will be proven wrong? Star Trek style warp drive?
Imagine if the axis of evil proves to be true, what if it changes everything in the right way and allows mathematically for FTL Travel or hell anything we thought was impossible when it comes to space as possible. Just because we start from almost 0 doesn't mean we cant build our knowledge stronger than it was before. Imagine if so many unsolved questions were only unsolvable because our base knowledge was flawed, when its corrected imagine we answer all the old questions we had, just a thought.
yup, I think about shit like this all the time lol, what if we are just wrong about everything lol
Imagine if people rounded to 10m/s for gravity instead of the precise measurement, always gotta put in the extra work
i thought faster than light travel was theoretically possible, something to do with warping the space around you, rather than actually accelerating past light speed.
Dream on. NASA staffs must quit and put their effort and study the sea. Space is vast and unreachable, but it's just a void of life. Sea is much more life and become Hashtag TeamSea. Also I don't care even the Space is reachable by astronauts and just let the people in Earth be their grave, cuz people worship the Earth, which means Earth much more superior to everything in the Universe.
Accept defeat. No Aliens are allowed to disagree.
I'm sorry for taking you're sweetroll
There was a movie that came out 8 years ago called “The Principle” that talked about this same topic and the mainstream cosmologists like Lawrence Krauss tried to sweep it under the rug
Unfortunately the scientific community is very much in favor of ignoring such discoveries. Scientists are people too, and faced with having their lifes work being reduced to nothing more than a footnote in history makes it very difficult for them to accept reality sometimes.
Ummm no. No they’re not. See this multiple verification thing is how we avoid putting out bullshit. That’s why creationism is so far outdated no one even gives it a thought anymore other than indoctrinated morons
No they aren't and never have been
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.
- Max Planck
I only know of one scientist that was, I forgot his name but while researching about the causes of a disease known as Kuru, he theorized that it was caused by a virus, prizes and outbreaking discoveries etc. turns out it was prions, when prions were discovered, the man rejected this fact vehemently because it threw away his work and research, in the end Kuru was indeed caused by prions. Most scientists are objective, but sometimes objectivity fails, scientists are only human and humans are not infaible@@andrewdentremont8415
As somewhat of a 'scientist' myself (MSc Geology), I always giggle a bit at these videos. Most of these scientists I know salivate at such findings. It's what drives them. Science is not a dogma to uphold, it's a fascination for reality. Nothing terrifying about it. Just pure nerdism...
You're not a good scientist if you watch these uncited clickbate videos for your information
@@Syn7axErr0r how would you actually know? 😉
@@lexdeobesean cited sources from scholarly articles
@@Syn7axErr0r then what are you doing here?
@@lexdeobesean maybe the same reason as you?
As a scientist I would DEFINETLY atleast make an effort to rewrite the findings to suit the fact of living in a non-homogenous universe
Yep
Enjoy your 3 brain aneurysms a day.
I’d say there are scientists doing that for a decade now
@Jamie the Moth then as a scientist you should be aware that this video just lied to everyone and misrepresented scientific consensus on multiple claims. My BS meter went off a few seconds into the video when they stated scientists are scared of new data. Unless, the data is on climate change or about a meteorite or another apocalypse scenario, when do you ever see scientists be scared of new data?! No! Scientists are curious by their very nature. That's why they are constantly investigating and conducting experiments. Smh. You can tell that the creators of these videos are only after the likes, comments, and views. They never once actually speak to a science educator on any subject to even understand it. Smh...I just can't with this channel anymore. It's just become click bait.
@@Ajax1063 well I enjoy the content, if I truly were a scientist my outlook on life and general attitude would be diffrent, too but I am not, and simply find these videos entertaining. I would have dug deeper, did I need the information, but thank you nevertheless for clearing up
I like how the new, more advanced telescopes kept verifying that the Axis of Evil exists, so the scientists tried harder and harder to disprove the data they were receiving- if I were a scientist, I would be SUPER excited to learn what we were working on is wrong! Even just watching CZcams science videos, every time I learn something new that makes the universe change to me, I get so hyped up, and it stirs my imagination and makes me want to know more. If you are a scientist and you don't have that spark, you're in the wrong field.
(Also, the fact that there is a potential giant new batch of research should be more exciting than anything, that's job security right there...)
they're trying to disprove the axis of evil because if it's real, then it means that more than 90% of our current understanding of the universe is wrong. and if we're going to all collectively agree that everything we know and have proven to be 'true' for the last 80 years is, in fact, wrong. then we have to without a shadow of a doubt, prove that the axis of evil is indeed real. that means LOTS and LOTS of rigorous testing.
Scientists always should attempt to disprove something new. If there is a rational answer within our current understanding, then either it gives a little more evidence, or a new line of thinking to prove the same conclusion could itself lead to new discoveries. Scientists don't go claiming every odd radio signal or weird chemical signature in space is aliens after all. However, if a new discovery proves again and again to break what we currently know, then it could potentially be worth revisiting older theories to see where they may be wrong or not 100% as accurate as assumed. For example, the interstellar object Oumuamua had a lot of theories about it maybe being alien tech, but what was actually found is that interstellar objects passing through our solar system is just way more common than expected, which is itself very interesting!
This video is kinda misleading. Scientists weren’t scared and trying harder and harder to disprove their findings. They were trying to check and double check their findings. Also scientists are supposed to try and disprove new theories because that means science is working and doing what it’s supposed to do. This is a HUGE discovery. You can’t base one finding of data from a discovery like this. You need to check and triple check to make sure there isn’t anything that could’ve misconstrued the data or some anomaly. Scientists are the complete opposite of scared. This video just uses that word for bait and views really. All the articles and journals I’ve read on the matter convey the exact opposite feelings that this video claims they have. Sure some researches and scientists might be “scared” but only in the sense that this will change their whole life’s work and study of everything they know. Not because they don’t want to be proven wrong. They aren’t scared in the way that this video is conveying, but then again I’m not surprised.
Society, modern society, doesn't like thinking it may be wrong about anything. It hurts science.
@@Vespyr_ It hurts feelings* and maybe pockets sometimes. Not science.
Why is the idea of science behind big bang theory and speed of light breaking so horrifying? Isn't science all about creating theory and math, finding something new and re-creating those theories and doing math again?
redoing all those theories could prove things previously believed impossible possible
which is exciting to this about
@@GalaxyTGW yh idk why some people find this upsetting this could lead to further development in our technology
Because people tend to stick to a motive or opining/theory, call it whatever you want, and are scared to have things changed, especially when they were so used to it for decades.
@@MrBeattraxx It is just like doing an assignment that took you 1 month to complete you go submitting it and they tell you this is all wrong do it again.
Yeah, science should not be handled like a religion. It's honestly not too unreasonable to think one end of the Big Bang object gave out more even do to not rounded imperfections of previous cycles of the universe that we can't understand yet in our short life span. Taking these little considerations, investigating them, and maybe experimenting around them may just improve our technology and methods as a species.
In the end the thing that really matters is we as a species to keep learning more and more.. And I don't think scientists are just ignoring what the telescope found, rather they may be looking for a different approach/idea to the issue
I think a ton of them will ignore it and brush it off as "highly unlikely" like they do everything that doesn't fit their predetermined ideas. The reason I think most will hold out until it's impossible to keep it up without being labeled negatively is because today's scientists are very much like the general public, they are married to their beliefs and they've let what they thought they knew define who they are and to admit they were wrong would be admitting the last however many years of who they were was a lie and/or wrong. An example of this would be the recent pandemic and masks and how thats being handled around the world. To a lot of them "science" has become their religion and they treat it as absolute, which is the antithesis of what science actually is. If they didn't view it that way there would be no reason for this video to even ask whether or not this new info would be ignored or not because if the scientists of the world were being true to the art of science it would be insulting to even consider shelving new evidence out of convenience
@@Eleitores_Desinformados 🤦🏾♂️
@@Eleitores_Desinformados I just believe most science people love science because at least it attempts to prove things. Most people knock religion because it is belief with no questioning. They believe mindlessly. No questions. Just blind belief. People hear them say “God created everything. That’s it.” And they’re are like “Well prove it or how do you know that absolutely?.” That’s all.
@@Eleitores_Desinformados Hell yeah man. I practice spirituality. I believe we were meant to be spiritual and elevated well beyond where we are now. I feel I also have that intimate connection. It’s amazing. It feels eternal.
A lot of scientist don’t like to be wrong or disproven. It seems they’d rather have their theory’s be the mostly accepted theory and go down in history as that rather than be disproven and wrong
Just speculation, but you know how the "speed" of light changes depending on the medium? What if the extreme density of the early universe was able to change the speed of light, bending all light into specific "concentration points"? The universe would be non-homogeneous, and we wouldn't have to rewrite science. Tell me your thoughts.
The idea has merit at least but then you have to bring up the question why said medium is in one or more places but not all of them evenly still by the humagenous theory, which still means we have to rethink everything.
The deviations caused by the medium are pretty much negligible when you put it in the scale of the universe. We're talking millions of light-years, discrepancies of hours are perfectly acceptable.
I feel like we're missing on a few key factors in that explanation because the universe doesn't look homogeneous when you look at the CBR but it might be statically.
We also know that there are forces accelerating the expansion of the universe, and exotic matter that jist doesn't interacts with everything else in the ways we know, so they could also be a source of fluctuations
My gander would be that the universe stated in a more homogeneous state, but it gets more chaotic as entropy increases. Space keeps on being created, giving more room for error (pun not intended)
@@sparking023 Thanks!
@@sparking023 yeah but eith the distance travelled the distance would get more drastic and such it's more noticeable.
You din't grasp idea. Universe had to be homogenous with actual theory. Yes, over time spreading led to creating of hollow and concentrated areas, though, it should have same pattern. So if light was bent, it should be bent in same way everywhere. Which seemingly is not true.
bro didn't even mention that the axis of evil is on the same plane as our solar system. it implies that we are the center of the universe, and that we have a creator.
I'm really enjoying videos going into deep depths on the universe that we live in lately. I wish I would have taken science more serious in school. Very cool stuff.
Same here!
I can feel you bruh, wish would have taken interest in physics….
sobeautiful...
Hey! I keep getting mail for you at my house in eastern Iowa, Rusty Shackleford... Update the USPS with your new address. I'm tired of getting your mail 😮💨
Guys, Elon Musk is building reusable rockets after self studying for a few years.. so i am sure, if you are very deeply interested, you can start studying by the side of what you are doing right now and then see how it goes?
Using the cosmic microwave background to map the entire universe isn't real accurate and we still don't understand enough. People 100-200 years from now will laugh at what we thought of the universe today
it's future science right now, all we know it's to little and what we know could be not true
No they won't. No one's laughing at Copernicus, Kepler, Galilee, or Newton.
They even more than us, will know the scaffolding of understanding much be built. Understanding our universe is not easy. It has been the longest, and most difficult undertaking in human history.
Perhaps understanding our ultimate creator would be the only thing more difficult, or mathematically improbable.
@@Markbell73 Your last sentence sounds like “Therefore God”
Should have seen this one coming.
@@theangrysuchomimus5163 that's what you get from what I said?
In a hundred years I doubt we will understand the universe much better than we do now, I am sure they will be wrong hah
"The probability is so low, that must mean its an impossibility!"
I know thats not exactly what they were saying, but I've heard arguements based on probability before, and it feels like that all have that unsaid "but it might as well be impossible." Probabilities mean that there is in fact a chance, no matter how unlikely.
Edit: Also, the fear of being wrong and having to start over is stupid. If its wrong, there's nothing you can do to change that. The best you could do is figure it out as soon as possible and try to see how wrong it was so we can even have a possibility to fix it. If you are close minded about the possibility, then you aren't a true scientist. Laws don't exist, theorys that haven't been proven wrong yet do.
Exactly. Thats why its called the big bang theory. Not the big bang law.
Bro wrote a book 💀
Imagine going forward and forcing everyone to continue learning off of some basis that's been proven wrong. It's pointless. From then on, you know all your calculations are off the mark. All your basis is gone, so continued learning would be pointless. The only way it has a point is if you learn from what proves you wrong.
Also, yes, probability is something a lot of articles and channels like this misuse. Either they don't understand that just because the chance exists means it happens as often as probability dictates it should, and they don't understand that the chance of something happening only grows more likely if you take out one of the alternatives as an option. Every time you roll a die, your chance is one in six to get any number. Every time you roll, your chance is one in six. It doesn't become two out of six on your second roll or three out of six on your third.
The other thing is what you mentioned. I'm reminded of a quote from Tales of Xilia. When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be truth.
What is the probability of an observed event? 100%. Actually, the question is meaningless.
Most of the things we do is pointless, I mean after all there is just too many things the human brain just can’t comprehend. Yet humans strive to know everything, to understand everything.. whenever a question is solved, 10 other questions pop up. Even if this theory is right, there will be a another theory proving it wrong. After all we barely know anything about space at all. However with further mutation in the human brain, there might me a possibility to break the barrier. After all we can’t even define what gravity really is. If all theories are valid, until proven wrong. Then we will always go in circles. I guess what I am really trying to say is, the more we know, the less we understand. We just can’t live without the why. and one day it will be the death of us.
We just need to find 'Holy axis' to fight against 'Axis of evil'.
Yes, but isn't this wonderful! This is why I love science so much. There is never an end to it.
Because our imaginations keep making stuff up
@@Michael-ro3fv That's why it's fun
My thinking exactly. Some may find this inconvenient but others will see opportunity.
@@Eleitores_Desinformados can you give a piece a evidence of god being real?
@@Eleitores_Desinformados look like you didnt learn a thing from the bible, keep disappointing god with your ego.
In a vast over-simplification of the Big Bang universe - can't scientists look at things as a somewhat random dispersion comparative to a 'break' on a pool table? Some area will cluster, other void, some will string, some area will hardly move. The nailing down would be the forces at play interacting with one another, or cancelling each other out. Maybe...there might even be a substantial force that existed, and now has grown too weak to hardly even register anymore.
Doesn’t randomness include the possibility of clumping?
Or like a drop of food coloring in water how it goes whatever direction it feels like
What if there are thing our eyes in current composition just can’t see
@@adamshepaard8199 What if
@@justsomegamerwithoutmustache then we could be overlooking a large portion of information simply because we don’t know to look for it
There are plenty of animals that have the ability to see thing on this planet that we don’t
Why wouldn’t that apply to things in space as well
If you think of the universe in 4 dimensions, the center of the universe is the center of space and time. therefore the center is the Big Bang.
Interesting SCP entry.
To everyone that’s struggling in life everything will be okay. You are amazing no matter what people say and think!!
thats extremely ignorant of you to say. how can you say things are okay when youre generalizing. youre kind of a pos
🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗
These comments always makes me think..
What if I am a serial killer? Am I still amazing no matter what people think?
Maybe there IS a core to the universe and we just havent found it yet. Leading with this idea, if the core acts similarily or has similar properties to a quasar, like exerting massive amounts of energy from two sides, maybe the energy is enough to speed up the spreading of the universe but only in some places?
Or maybe it could also be that the observable universe is just the smallest fraction of the actual universe and we are just perceiving the speedup differently?
Even if it is simply a small fraction, the differences between voids and clumps are still too big. The problem is that the speed of light might be relative.
This is opportunity, an amazing thing to further our understanding and technical prowess as a civilization! We can’t just give up because we are afraid that it’s too much work! How would we ever evolve if all we do is lay back and pretend our glaring issues don’t exist?
I do have an idea of what the Axis of Evil is, maybe. Sometimes when you drop food dye into a glass of water, the dye doesn't spread evenly initially within those fractions of a second, the reason why is the slight density differences in the water because of gravity, pressure, H2O particles trying to stick together and so on.
Now lets bring this up to a universal scale. This idea Im putting forward would suggest there was matter or some other force that existed either before or at the moment of the big bang we have yet to obverse. If matter existed before the big bang, that would suggest the universe is existing in stages of extreme heat and preasure a slowly cooling until heat death or to repeat again maybe like water turning from vapor, to liquid and to ice. Fun fact, Ice can explode if put under enough preasure.
If there is a unknown force, it would be something so strong it could move bits of the universe but so unseen we haven't observed it yet kinda like how we can't see a black hole or dark matter with the naked eye. Now I have a couple ideas what this force could do. It could be something that binds galaxies together much like dark matter but its not matter, more like small influence of particles or even the result of the emission of particles themselves like a solar wind but on a broader spectrum. Another possility is that the speed limit of light is wrong or in flux.
For wrong, light emissions travel at different speeds which would suggest a lot of what know is wrong and opens the door to time travel too which is fun but dangerous. If light travels at different speeds for each star or source it emits from, dear god, I can barely imagine how much chaos that would bring.
If light is in Flux by some force such as gravity, then light can slow down or distort over a long enough time. Time would be the biggest factor here if the Speed Limit of light is in flux because it would also suggest the universe operates on a wider clock differentiation much like years or decades over minutes to hours as we have observed, possibly much larger spans of time lost or gained in these bubbles of flux. If this force can affect Space/Time in such a way, then it can certainly mess with the speed of light easily as well as the background radiation or even the cooling of the universe.
If this force causes Time to Flux much more then gravity, it does open a lot more doors some wild stuff but we can't dismiss them if they are possible now.
I don't understand all the science I've been exposed to, but light was explained to me as like a photon and an electromagnetic wave, but the electromagnetic wave is like looping around the photon so its actually going several times faster than the photon. i know electromagnetic force is not applied evenly accross the universe because gravity is not equal in all places and magnets dont pull from across the planet.
so my impression is that all the knowledge we have about light and energy is flawed. we're limited by our eyes even on an intellectual level.
@@jamescheddar4896 True, the fact Light is both a particle and a electromagnetic wave brings up a ton of questions already. This is one of the reasons why Quantium Physics and General Relativity don't work well together with our current understanding of nature.
One interesting question is can Light move magnets in anyway way possible? If not, one thing off the list, if yes, that would suggest what we see in the night sky is not only being moved by gravity or the explanation of the universe, but is being held together by light beams in a very tiny way. Kinda like having tiny quantum magnetic fields all over the place
I tend to think alot of forces, most in tiny ways hold the galaxy together and if Light is one of them, that would change somethings.
Idk, what you think?
@@NobleWolf I think Tesla was the closest to a unified theory on all this and he basically got robbed by Thomas Edison. He not only discovered electricity but he's responsible for every innovation on it. the power grid hasn't improved on his ideas. they're just now digging up his old patents and trying to replicate them, you know the wireless charger for your phone? he invented that
@@jamescheddar4896 I don't think Tesla cared about patents, He was far more with expanding knowledge and inventing things even though it effected his health, but still I do agree, Tesla was ahead of his time and he could have changed the world massively if he was alive today again
Well the light and information may travel at different speeds. But I’m still relatively sure that causality remains constant regardless of how long it takes for the information of it’s happening to travel.
I personally think everything we think we know we don't. The universe changes so much. Only way we are actually going to know is once a light drive engine is built.
The problem with that is our time.We will destroy this planet ourselves before we get to that revolutionary invention and im so sad because of that.Our best chance is to focus on spaceship that goes on nuclear fusion and crio chambers to freeze us for a long period of time.
Yeah, I think that too..
That's impossible what is more likely is extension of lifespan
That's the way true science goes. Everything is written in stone, until there's a new stone, and there always is. Stay curious.
@@theodoreroberts3407 🔥🔥
To be honest, I think most scientist actually enjoy breaking things, even well established models, because they can lead to new perhaps more interesting discoveries.
I strongly disagree, not that they don't want to, or wouldn't enjoy it, but turning against the established models makes more enemies than friends, and since the most influential people in the scientific community are those who have been around a while it's their models you would be turning against. So guess what scientist is not going to get that next round of funding, whos going to get their grant proposal rejected, or have to publish their findings in a second rate publication only to have it torn apart out of context in the main publications by a new up and coming scientist that isn't challenging the established models and is receiving all the praise and funding from his peers who are more than happy to make a few phone calls on his behalf. Sadly ego, greed, and department politics are more important than the truth and if you don't get in line then enjoy spending the rest of your life trying to find a new career while you are crushed by student loans you took out to get your doctorate degree that is no longer worth the paper it was printed on. I know we like to think of science as being altruistic and pure, but in reality, the corruption and dirty politics found in the scientific community would make Washington politicians blush.
Yeah I think the blanket accusation that "scientists are frightened" is completely unfounded. The very fact that we are watching videos of different hypothesis shows that "scientists" are _not only_ in an ongoing search for answers, but enthusiastic about being on the scientific cusp of the next big discovery. (Physicists and astrophysicists would be more accurate)
@@kevenbates4313 Very convincing cross checked data is still hard to argue with.
@@W1ngSMC Agreed and hopefully with the utilization of platforms like CZcams and open discussions we will see a push back on some of the negative aspects of the scientific community that is holding back potential advancement. It's not all doom and gloom as my response might have someone thinking and it is not the intent of my comment to suggest that. Instead, I wanted to simply provide balance to the conversation as many comments here seem to be of the misunderstanding that science and more so the way research and discoveries are handled are pure as the driven snow and above reproach. So I provided an example to illustrate how many outside factors obfuscate and hinder scientific advancement and why it could be difficult for scientists to challenge a widely trusted model without risking severe consequences to their career, future potential, and livelihood.
Nah. Not lately
Wow… definitely will want to stay updated on this.
I swear, what if we are ignoring the whole concept of “relativity” being, well, relative. In that case, nothing would be “constant” if you’re always confined with the comparative speed of something else that can be observed.
If nothing can “observe” an object, what is defining the relative speed of light for it? What if the speed of light is defined by the fastest object accelerating away from us?
Its been realized that the "shape" of the CMB pretty much matches the shape of our galaxy's clouds of dust and gas, giving rise to the thought that we aren't getting anywhere near an accurate picture of the CMB. An analogy would be that someone in a forest wanted to examine faraway clouds and took pictures of them and drew a "map of the clouds". With more and more examination, he realized his cloud map looked like the trees in his backyard.
The world we live in is a strange and mysterious place. We act as if we are the dominant species, but in reality we don't know 0.0001% of the things/features of our universe
@@Hellenic_Empire We are the dominant species. Just because we haven't learned everything about everything doesn't mean we aren't at the top. At least until something knocks us off, but that's a bridge we'll cross when we get to it.
@@ford383 a large asteroid can hit earth and humans cant do anything about it, we're dominant in a bubble
@@brandoncammon7971 As far as we know, we are the only species to advance this far. We ARE the dominant species at this moment, or at least until we find some aliens to topple us off our "throne".
@@ford383 can we stop an asteroid? No, dominance doesn't mean anyone can stop an asteroid, even if people tried
I’m so obsessed with our universe, space, and everything in it. It’s so mind boggling to think we already know so much. But the scientists being scared of something they don’t know is ridiculous. There’s going to always be something new about the universe, that’s what makes it so amazing.
I'm also obsessed with the universe. Before I die I want to know if aliens are real, that's all I ask.
@@doop3230 I have hope that there are aliens. I mean, there can’t just be us in this massive universe. There’s no way.
@@bunnykalina I absolutely agree
I would think that some theorists , cosmologists, and astronomers may feel depressed having worked all their lives believing the big bang was the right model. The fear of being wrong perhaps.
@@Cole-jb5ip maybe. Scientists are very smart. And I bet when they find something close to the truth and the only thing they discovered is a relief. And the. As soon as they find something that’s way bigger I bet it is a shock.
There is so much about the universe and how it works that we have not the slightest idea of. The more we know, the more we realize how complex the universe truly is and how much more there is for us to grasp. Science is incredible despite its limits.
The discovery of the axis of evil is like the discovery that earth isn’t the center of the universe. They hated the idea then, but came to accept it.
Love this channel! It fills all my nerdy needs
I'm all for this being real, actually. After all, our greatest discoveries have often required a complete overhaul of our understanding at the time. Why shouldn't that be the case today?
Okay but the problem is that this points to a created universe. And many scientists think this isn't appropriate.
@@GeovanniCastro666 How do you figure?
@@GeovanniCastro666 explain how it’s created? Not arguing but trying to understand and learn.
@@nickgennady Non-homogenous mean that there is something that isn't random element affect the initial state.
In another hand, an artificial universe.
@@tungleson7066 another point goes to the virtual universe sim
“In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth” science stays confirming stuff we’ve known for thousands of years.
Honestly, it wouldn't shock me that the universe is expanding unevenly. Maybe it was expanding basically the same speed when the big bang happened, but as the universe expands and heat distributes unevenly, creating pockets of voids, it affects the expansion onward. Kinda like when particles move slower, they are colder and when particles move faster, they are hotter. Maybe it's the same with the expansion of the universe, which would also indicate that the universe isnt infinite... just a thought. I'm no physicist. Just a regular guy.
Lmk what y'all think
What’s really fascinating is what lies beyond the Universe, this empty space. How far does it go, especially if the Universe ISNT infinite
@@snb2ndchannel591 God I don't have the mind for astrophysics, but I SO WISH I DID!! I'm going into biology instead, but as these things pick up, it's really making me want to jump into all of this. Not that there aren't still things to find in the biology of life (actually quite the opposite, I think), but I would jump at the chance to rewrite the universe more accurately...
I love that the universe "expands into nothing," but nothing has to be something, right? Not a lot of something, but just enough nothing to at least have a name. The science field has had so many great questions and overhauls over the centuries, so the fact that we could be on the edge of another shift/discovery what with the possible nullification of the Big Bang... God I hope we figure this out before we burn out
axis of evil exists because speed of light is not constant and depends on speed of observer. We move through absolute space and therefore light that moves in oposite direction is faster and therefore seems warmer
That is not a fact just a theory
@@dimman3607 the difference is fact. What is interesting, independence of speed of light from speed of observer is considered as fact for 100 years already with no real reason.
@@matterasmachine Use GPS on your phone...?
Proof that both Special & General Relativity are correct...
@@philcoombes2538 no. It only proves that speed of light does not depend on speed of source. I have video on that. I have no any idea why you guys added observer there.
Everything about this comment is wrong.
We're never going to run out of conundra like this when it comes to the sciences. Which will keep scientists happily and gainfully employed forever.
I've always had a real problem accepting that our perspective in the| universe isn't greatly overcorrected in some parts and under in others when trying to measure the distance of different places in universe
The way I’ve always seen it is we’ve observed maybe 5% of the universe (and even this number is debatable). To claim we know exactly how it works is just insane. We don’t even know if physics even work the same way across all of the universe. We don’t know that there isn’t some particular that just doesent exist in our part of the universe that changes how things work.
This reminds me alot of speedrunning games. When a new strat or glitch is found that completely destroys the old strat it's very disheartening. Hundreds of thousands of hours spent into learning that route just to have to change it completely because someone else for a way to do it one second faster.
I knew everything we know beyond the galaxy is incorrect, probably.
Just brainwash people like the multiverse even though there is no hard evidence it exists. Yet normal individuals are called crazy if we say we saw Cardi B at Las Vegas
More likely,Cause where not really sure, if we're gonna explain it in very simple way we are like guessing
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Yes scientists make some guessing but no real proof
That may be one of the truist statements made. There was a time when we thought leachs could cure everything.
Damn, ive got a better chance at living in a non homogenous universe than winning the lottery
Its weird how our foundational theories about the universe itself can be so mistaken, but certain trivial things will always be true
Metal Gear Rising warned us about this
There has been a theory going around that has gained a lot of traction that explains the discrepancy in the radiation findings. Theory is at there are multiple universes and the differences in radiation are results of collisions between our universe and other universes.
Well ok but then we have another problem: to my knowledge there is absolutely zero evidence for multiple universes. It is simply a fun theory.
If I was a scientist, I'd have to take into account these findings and re-write my understanding of the universe and outer space. Since I'm not a scientist, I'm not sure how this would/will be done, but it's not science to avoid studying it.
It's not like science but it's definitely like today's scientists. This situation is a great illustration of what's currently wrong with our scientific community and it's this risk aversion group-think that is so poisonous to learning. Theories are generated and over time, if they are accepted by the scientific community, they are treated as "facts" instead of theories. And, if you disagree with these "facts", you are ostracized by your colleagues. Another good example is the concept of human history and the age of "civilizations". Conventional science says that human civilization is about 5,000 years old but there are lots of examples of older civilizations that are being ignored by the establishment because it's inconvenient to the narrative.
@@johnm1926 yeah, I agree for the civilisation part. Because right now, I am confused between what I know of my indian history (which is older than 10,000 years atleast) while according to the modern theories, which are no longer just theories but have rather become facts as you said. They say indian civilisation started some 6000 years ago or so. That doesn't make much sense.
What do I do now 😞
@@johnm1926 - In support of your comment - "Darwin's THEORY of Evolution" has now evolved into "the FACTs of Evolution."
The "God particle" is proof of God - yet science deny this a say "it's a play on words" and like to call it the Higgs-Boson particle after its evolutionist discoverers, and not its real designer - God.
( Next science will be telling us all "the earth is a sphere" - when all conscientious flat-earth researchers have proven its as flat as the ground. Lay a straight-edge on the ground and it proves the earth is flat. LOL)
@@johnm1926 I strongly agree, not that they don't want to, or wouldn't enjoy it, but turning against the established models makes more enemies than friends, and since the most influential people in the scientific community are those who have been around a while it's their models you would be turning against. So guess what scientist is not going to get that next round of funding, whos going to get their grant proposal rejected, or have to publish their findings in a second rate publication only to have it torn apart out of context in the main publications by a new up and coming scientist that isn't challenging the established models and is receiving all the praise and funding from his peers who are more than happy to make a few phone calls on his behalf. Sadly ego, greed, and department politics are more important than the truth and if you don't get in line then enjoy spending the rest of your life trying to find a new career while you are crushed by student loans you took out to get your doctorate degree that is no longer worth the paper it was printed on. I know we like to think of science as being altruistic and pure, but in reality, the corruption and dirty politics found in the scientific community would make Washington politicians blush.
@@kevenbates4313 Well said.
This is why I'm aggravated when people accept theories as fact, and become rigid in their thinking, and even close minded. It's so easy to have the rug pulled out from under you. One discovery can cause your beliefs to collapse. It's insane to me. I take everything with a grain of salt, and observe out of curiosity and wonder, never would I claim to know exaclty what the universe is, especially since we can't even see all of it. 😂
Theories actually are facts, they are the single best explanation at the time, with the currently available data. They are as close to facts as you can get with induction/abduction.
@@andrewdentremont8415 My point being, there's always a minute chance that it could be wrong. As you say, it's the single best explanation at the time, but a new discovery could dethrone the theory. Not to mention there are multiple theories also. I'm not saying to ignore science, I'm saying to always keep an open mind to new discoveries. A lot of people refuse to move forward because they refuse to believ they're wrong, it's arrogant.
@@andrewdentremont8415 But theories by definition are not facts since they have yet to be proven. I still believe the big bang theory too but think about it, in the infant position the human race is in now, how could we possibly confirm that the big bang is true with 100% assurance? There's an incomprehensible amount of obstacles keeping us from confirming it in the technological stage we are in, but it only makes sense with how much else we theorize so we accept it as fact.
But don't forget, Plato, one of the philosophers who paved the way for modern science took it best from his mentor, "I know one thing and that is that I know nothing."
What’s the song near the end but not the outro?
A scientist, that call himself as such, is happy to find that everyone before him was wrong. This will be a way to forever become the embodyment of everything he has done untill now.
Ok, can we all just appreciate Riddle for the damn research they've put into it for all these informations and summarizing them briefly in front of us
In the wise words of Mermaid Man "EEEEEEVIIIIILLLLLLLL!!!!" Lol
You never ignore evidence, just because it doesn’t support your theory doesn’t mean the evidence is wrong it means your theory is wrong. You cannot just choose to believe something you’ve proven wrong yourself.
It's not a bad thing if past knowledge from science is proven wrong, that's what science is. Humanity learns and adapts.
this type of stuff is always so entertaining to me, keep up the great work
trueeee
Hmmm
The only thing we need on this matter is a means to escape our galaxy, and look at our universe from a completely different perspective.
If only we had the technology. That would be SO ground breaking. I’m so obsessed with space and our universe. I hope I’m alive to see it happen.
@@bunnykalina
Yeah, if we obtain that tech during this century, I'd definitely be amazed.
We finally got to see what the shadow of Sagittarius A* (the black hole in the center of our galaxy) looks like.
Do it a few more time and here you go, you know all of space ~
@@aez.e
I don't know if that logic works for me; if it works like that, sure!!
The reason it scares scientist so much is bc they’re afraid to admit that there is order and design in our universe. Pointing to a Creator….
Science is used to proving itself wrong. That's literally the goal of science.
My own theory after the introduction of white holes is that the big bang was a white hole that formed from the collapse of a black hole that ate the entire universe, and this axis of evil is the collection of dense stars that was clumped together at the event horizon of the white hole when it was scaling expanding off from it.
Maybe, I know a little bit about the recent white hole discovery but not enough to add value to that aspect of the conversation. Instead, I would point out that it is interesting that it appears when you model the axis of evil it looks very similar to the geometry of the magnetic fields and the dielectric plane of inertia found at the belt of every magnetic field. See the same geometry in Quasars and hydrogen atoms as well. I think understanding why that geometry is the way it is every time is the key to understanding what is actually going on. Have you ever wondered why the north and south poles of a magnet are different sizes, not by much of course but funny enough the geometrical difference between the north and the south magnetic field is the same as a chicken egg? Strange how the universe seems to only work with this one fundamental geometry from an atom all the way to a quasar. But why is where the fun is.
You’re a bit ahead of yourself
That's a really big jump
That's not a theory, that's speculation
I’ve felt this fundamentally, sense I’ve recognized hw to view/feel/recognized my own brain/thoughts/essence. This is deep. And very exciting to see science was able to put it in words, finally!
It always blows my mind when people are quick to say, "The Universe is 13.8 billion years old." It's impossible to know that. Hell, the vast majority of planet we live on is still a mystery to us. This is very exciting news! Can't wait to see what other discoveries they stumble upon.
Could be the breakthrough that makes space travel technology possible. Definitely continue the investigation.
What if we are just slowly drifting into a black hole all this time? That would explain a lot of things.
We technically are. If you include the one at the Centre of the milky way. Or the possibility of us running into andromeda’s when the two galaxy’s collide.
What if the universe is just a giant planet ball
What if everything just a simulation
It would also explain why I've had the same vision of being eaten by a black hole for the past 2 years.
@@wakeup1783 I mean come on. Look at everything that happened? It‘s all an outcome of time travel & supermassive black hole 🎬
Am I the only one who see this as something positive? I just think we are learning more and more about the universe.
GEBOS :D - I'd say you are the only one. We other humans all need our heads examined.
Looks like I want my money back on all my old school books - as they were lies.
Next science will tell us "we are created by an intelligent designer and that evolution was a flawed understanding;" or that 1+1+1=1 and not 3, as with the trinity doctrine. If so - I will become a Christian and start believing in the Bible as God's word.
Even a supercomputer says that we’re an oddity among all probabilities
Reality is reality. Always accept factual information regardless of personal inconvenience.
The first mistake was believing we know how any of this works in the first place
exactly. it's only a guess on how this works
It's funny how everyone takes this for granted when it's not even possible to prove even 0.01% of these theories by experiment. 99% of what we "know" about space is just a thought experiment. Scientists have become extremely arrogant in the 21st century, while having not even 1% of the talent scientists in antiquity had. Ancient Greeks accurate measured earths radius using nothing but shadows and geometry and today scientists have billions of dollars in funding and the latest and most advanced instruments known to man and scientific progress has become exponentially low. Imagine if Archimedes had access to modern tools.
Hi Riddle I’m a huge fan! I love your vids and they are so interesting!
What this proves to me, is that we really know so very little about the universe and that there is much more to learn.
I mean, a bunch of people who’ve spent their entire lives in the bubble of an education system. I could easily see them not wanting to admit they’ve been looking at things completely wrong. A lot of these people are grown children, with no life experience outside of the school system.
I believe, there are already some small factions of scientists holding opinions differ than the mainstream since decades or centuries ago. It just the public did not know about that.
Tbh this is pretty sad and interesting at the same time its sad because the other scientist that have discovered those knowledge that already died wouldnt even know their wrong and its pretty interesting that if the axis of evil really exist we probably could discovers tons of new stuff that will most probably lead to even faster development
Scientists would act based on evidence. So why would they shy away from new evidence that could disprove previous theories? No matter how much work it may be.
Wonder what kind of effects gravity wells could be having on the expansion, making it grow a disproportionate rates at different sections. Would be neat if we found a way to measure or even see gravity through exploring this Axis of Evil
I mean, the speed of sound isn't homogenized, either. It depends on the surroundings etc. Same for the light.
Nah light depends is negligible
Because sound waves are vibrational, & thus depend on the medium through which they are travelling (faster in solids than in air, so you feel something before you hear it)...
@@philcoombes2538 sameaybe be applicable to light we just don't know more about it.
Speed of light has already beeen measured to travel slower through mediums like water or air versus through a vacuum. Light also moves slower near super massive bodies such as large planets and black holes.
@@philcoombes2538 Light is a wave as well. it has wavelenghts
There are a lot of Big Bang physics that have conformed to to the Standard Model and there are a lot of Big Bang physics that have not conformed to the Standard Model, such as the axis situation. I think a Big Mistake (Being slightly facetious) is in viewing the Big Bang in a strictly mechanistic way. It could be that a better, more workable way to view the so-called beginning of the Universe would be as some kind of quasi-biological genetic event, and better described as the "Big Birth". I'll leave for now the question of whether the event was natural or supernatural. Again, being only slightly facetious, you might better describe the expansion of the Universe in much the same way as a biological cell divides over and over again to make a larger, more complex organism. And, since the Standard Model seems to be without answers on the matter/antimatter dilemma, it may very well be that the Universe did not, and could not, begin until it was worked out, quasi DNA-wise, how to circumnavigate the dead end matter-anti/matter annihilation quandary, etc etc etc.
Outstanding theory
As above so below, as they say.
@@taimakwilliams4144 Thank you. I'm a terrible writer but I try to make it as clear as I can. If people want to see, and maybe it's there, the similarity between brain neurons and synapses and intergalactic filaments my theory/hypothesis is a logical starting point. Btw, your reply/comment shows that you're probably at least brilliant, if not a genius. And I don't mean that as a reflection on me but you.
Anyone ever consider multiple big bangs at different intensities?
Or after a previous big bang and perhaps a heat death. Eventually as it all cools the universe actually did form a bubble that eventually retracted at an ever greater speed?
Not necessarily slapping together at a point and blowing up, nor necessarily pulling some super black hole or even white hole from it all.
Maybe something more like a chem reaction building up, compressing and booming?
that would be insane. And then to wonder if universes exist inside our heads. Or all around us. There is still so much left to be discovered
The universe was already found to be expanding at different speeds at different areas. So, the speed of light is limited at the speed of the areas expanding. This does not mean expansion was caused by an explosion, but the universe was being expanded/pulled by an outside force. This means the line that was where the pull is coming from. The idea that reality is being puled into exsistance from the outside.
I dont know if this would actually mean anything regarding the axis, but we can see a specific portion of the universe, but it may not be all of it. We can't exactly give a superposition in the space that allows for relative positioning, but if the universe is bigger than we think, could we potentially be in a side that has less mass than another side? Or more mass? Side isn't a good term either but I think it gets the point across. Is it possible that the inexplicable line is the same thing as the supervoid where in the scope of everything, its only a tiny deviation? Ratios require accurate number values, so if we have the size wrong, we may get an incorrect end result.
I dont know if we can ever actually find out. Since it's called the observable universe for a reason. Thats just my sub amateur guess.
I wonder if the expansions and areas growing faster instead of slower might be other universes are pushing against ours causing these effects?
I think if I were a young scientist I would be pretty obsessive with trying to analyze what the various data was saying and trying new disciplines to show how the universe is behaving
if I was a scientist? I would be excited by this. As exhilarating as it is to understand something completely and mater it fully, it is just as exciting to realize that there is always more to learn. The road goes ever on, Sancho, and be they windmill or giant, my lance strikes forward!
This is the whole point of science. Nor is it the first time a singular discovery disproved almost all of what we thought we knew. It's sad to see actual scientists forget this.
The older I get the less I believe in any of the existing so called science of space. There are just too many theories, we need something that will test and challenge those theories.
To ignore such a idea defines what it really means to be a scientist
Corrupt science
Frightened because it implies a creator.
You say frightening, I say reassuring.
What about the anthropic principle?
Great content and thanks!! ...but what makes the axis evil? I thought that whenever there's a crisis or a mystery in the field, scientists say it's a GOOD thing because there is much more to learn and discover. Anyway, thanks for not making this a documentary primarily about the history of physics. I know that sometimes it's necessary in order to explain something... but not every video every time like some channels lol🙏
One of the great things about science is that when they find something they explore it and test and when it is shown to be correct it is accepted, sweeping something under the rug because it means more work needs to be done is exactly the opposite of what a scientist would do. I would think it would be amazing to have new fields of study and research and the science community would be abuzz with excitement.
@Black Swan55 don't confuse scientists with engineers.
I strongly disagree, not that they don't want to, or wouldn't enjoy it, but turning against the established models makes more enemies than friends, and since the most influential people in the scientific community are those who have been around a while it's their models you would be turning against. So guess what scientist is not going to get that next round of funding, whos going to get their grant proposal rejected, or have to publish their findings in a second rate publication only to have it torn apart out of context in the main publications by a new up and coming scientist that isn't challenging the established models and is receiving all the praise and funding from his peers who are more than happy to make a few phone calls on his behalf. Sadly ego, greed, and department politics are more important than the truth and if you don't get in line then enjoy spending the rest of your life trying to find a new career while you are crushed by student loans you took out to get your doctorate degree that is no longer worth the paper it was printed on. I know we like to think of science as being altruistic and pure, but in reality, the corruption and dirty politics found in the scientific community would make Washington politicians blush.
@@kevenbates4313 Einstein's Theory of General Relativity was riddiculed at first. Scientific theories may not be accepted at first but after they are tested by others and are shown to be correct they are adopted. Look at String Theory and how many based careers on it and then left it. Science moves on in search of the truth and competing theories come and go.
This is what I wish the whole world could just focus on. Repair our planet and find ways to become interstellar. I dont have to be alive to see it but being alive to see it so close would be amazing enough. These discoveries are a amazing and makes me wish I took science more seriously in school, instead I'm more into computer and building AI lol
No way we are too busy making wars over nothing and profit.......
I thought from the thumbnail this was gonna be about some kinda death star looking object in space lol
Oh that's just the chaos rift that was created when Slaanesh arrived.
Our universe came from the end of another blackhole. Maybe everything a blackhole sucks in is blasting it into another universe?
As far as I remember, in science, everything is a theory until you can gather factual solid evidence that proves that this theory is a solid an absolute fact, and even then, if new evidence is discovered then what was previously a fact can become a simple error in maths.
Science is not about what we like or about our own personal bias, science is about knewledge and the truth, is about finding asking question and finding unbiased answers.
Yes it may be disheartening for those scientist who based their entire carriers on thd fact that the universe is evenly distributed, but if new evidence can indicates that what we consider a fact was an error in numbers, then we can't simply ignore it and wish it away.
That is not science, is the opossite of science.
While the axis of evil is terrifying and could destroy almost everything we know about space, it’s still NECESSARY we learn more about it and rethink our knowledge of space to get a better understanding of the universe.
When you said that the calculated speed of light may change I remembered Veritasium's video about how no one has ever measured the speed of light. Now I want to watch that video after ignoring it for a few months
The only result I'm interested in theories like this is because I want there to be something new, something that could break reality as we know it. If there is no new discovery then scientists are out of jobs and I've lost all interest, so I BEG them, please keep going and please figure out what no-one will take the time or put in the effort to figure out. In doing so you have all my gratitude if nothing else. -RJ
Kaluza Klein Theory shows that we can complete the Unified Field Theory if we consider more than 3 spatial dimensions. Those didn't necessarily expand uniformly. The laws of physics could vary across the universe because of that.
As a scientist i would absolutely love that, sinds it changes the way everything works, its terrifying but itsnt that why scientists are scientists like they chose it for a reason, and being able to find out about this knowledge and being there to discover it would be mindblowing to me
I would definitely look into it. Maybe it could give us more answers than we already have
So you saying scientists don't want to acknowledge the "axis of evil" because they don't want to be wrong about their theories of existence!?
Makes one wonder what else they don't want to be wrong about
Everything else. It's a puzzle to be sure . And you don't cut up puzzle pieces to make them fit. A person who works in any field of science has to be totally honest with themselves 😎
@@Cole-jb5ip well said my friend