We May Have the Key To the Theory of Everything... Let me Explain With a Model
Vložit
- čas přidán 10. 05. 2024
- Could String Theory Unite Quantum and Classical Physics? Enjoy exclusive Black Friday Discount of 23% off and Free Shipping on all Hoverpens with code ASTRUM: North America & other countries: bit.ly/astrum_novium UK & Europe: bit.ly/astrum_noviumeu
Astrum Podcast: www.buzzsprout.com/2250635/share
Displate Posters: displate.com/promo/astrum?art...
Astrum Merch! astrum-shop.fourthwall.com/
Join us on the Astrum discord: / discord
SUBSCRIBE for more videos about our other planets.
Subscribe! goo.gl/WX4iMN
Facebook! goo.gl/uaOlWW
Twitter! goo.gl/VCfejs
Astrum Spanish: / @astrumespanol
Astrum Portuguese: / @astrumbrasil
Donate!
Patreon: goo.gl/GGA5xT
Ethereum Wallet: 0x5F8cf793962ae8Df4Cba017E7A6159a104744038
Become a Patron today and support my channel! Donate link above. I can't do it without you. Thanks to those who have supported so far!
#astrum #astronomy #theoreticalphysics #unifiedtheory #stringtheory #physics #grandunifiedtheory
It's 42. (Duh)
Wrap it up, we're done here. Part 2 is unnecessary 😜
The Meaning of Life
But what is the question?
Good book, but it's actually 137
You beat me by 31 minutes.
The fact that there are still massive unknowns in our knowledge of the universe gives me a sense of peace. Knowing that there is still something more to all this
It’s very interesting that some people are made so uncomfortable by how much humans know about the universe
And uncomfortable about the idea that maybe we could understand it all, with the help from computers
Most of our 'science' is understanding observations; but we have NO CLUE how it really works, like gravity, magnetism and life force. We cannot see the 'end' of the universe, or smaller than a certain size, and all that probably by design.
IDK but my hypochondria has sent me to some very dark places lately and I needed to hear this comment for solace. Thank you.
Interesting, how people interpret things absolutely differently. I for example, find solace in the total opposite, not in the vagueness of it all but in the absoluteness of the last consequence in the universe: the big rip.
Whenever I feel overwhelmed, I feel a deep sense of calm and contentment in the imagination, that hopefully one day, everything will come to an halt, no interaction with any subatomic particle will occur and finally there will be eternal quiet.
Bro we still don't know practically anything
Thanks Astrum. 👍
NOVA's film "The Elegant Universe" by Dr. Brian Green, is also an excellent explanation of everything.
I love the part where Brian is trying to teach physics to a dog. Then explains that maybe our brains just aren't ready to puzzle that answer out yet.
That’s why GAI will go beyond our puny intellect.
We all know Dogs know everything just spell dog backwards and you get god who knows everything. that makes enough sense to satisify every dumb person.
I also have a great explanation.
This is an excellent video with many interesting concepts to ponder. The background music flows calmly with the narrative, is perfect for the content and is at an appropriate volume. Thank you, Astrum for your high quality content.
I am eager for the next video on this! Perhaps when it's all done you could also compile the videos into one just so that we have it there to watch in one long segment!
Definitely will do
I don't see much difference between the crazy small and the very large. It honestly looks exactly the same. Every paper saying otherwise seem crazy.
@@kevinroberts781 Then why do subatomic particles behave so differently from atoms and on a larger scale Solar Systems? I ain't got a clue myself.
@@kevinroberts781As above, So below.
It’s very true for everything and leads onto everything else
I also want a part two three or however long Alex wants to take to explain this in full.
I think the idea is plenty compelling enough to explore through more videos. Can't wait to see the next ones!
Please keep doing theoretical videos like this! This was amazingly refreshing! I am never against someone pondering things if they are informed & passionate about the cosmos. As long as someone is willing to put their ego aside and just enjoy pondering about nature. Then by all means have fun letting your mind explore different ideas, questions, concepts you are curious about or passionate about. This video was awesome. I wish you went into a ton more than you did. Please make more.
Keep going with this. I always enjoy another way of explaining these things. It helps me understand it better.
Me too
I love thinking and hearing about it. I've always thought videos and cameras are time machines, we can slow down and study things in slow motion, a teleport back in time, but we cannot alter it. Time is such a curious thing. If we could control time, we'd control everything. Maybe time is a string connecting everything. I love these videos, it's nice to grumble and specualte sometimes. I hope I live to see when someone prooves everything, and I hope we can focus more on progress than war and greed in that time.
👍 agreed ❤
The matter that makes up the stuff that your memories are made with is all still there, more or less, localized to your current planetary space time.
@@ascarylobster Thats called a spirit, but you know, modernists love to make up new fancy names while scoffing at the dumb ancients. 😇
@@Guyjharrison okay Jehovah’s Witness person
@@ascarylobsterjehovas witness person 😂😂😭😭😭
Cannot wait for part 2. This video is better than many others on the topic
Where is part 2?
I was trained in experimental physics so I take a more pragmatic view of String Theory - it's fun to discuss over coffee and donuts but until there is a testable prediction it's just a story we tell ourselves about why the world is as it is. Plus, I'm not completely convinced there has to be a robust theory of everything - the universe has such a massive range of scales from the infinitesimal to the infinite it's hard to model anything that can stay relevant throughout it. Just my take... still, cheers and looking forward to more on your thoughts on this topic (and others) ☕️🍩😋✌️
Since the universe can’t have contradictions there must actually be a common relationship. Whether we are able to discover it or not is another matter.
> I'm not completely convinced there has to be a robust theory of everything
There does have to be one. Every pattern can be described if we have enough information about it, even pure randomness (through statistical methods). The question is whether its one we mere mortals will ever be able to decipher the pattern and translate it into a mathematical language that we can understand and teach to future generations.
> the universe has such a massive range of scales
That's actually not a problem. We use laddering to deal with that - for example we (mostly) only consider the electron shells when dealing with chemistry rather than the full quantum mechanical nature of atoms, and we use fluid dynamics to describe liquids and gases rather than tracing out the state of each molecule, etc. As long as we have a regime where a "small" and a "large" theory overlap, we can say with fairly high confidence that we can continue on with the "large" theory at larger scales and the "small" theory at smaller scales. Nobody is going to be building a bridge by computing the quantum interactions of every single iron atom.
The problem with a theory of everything - any theory of everything - is that the top of our ladder (the theories) is currently way, way higher than we're currently able to climb (the experiments). IIRC the scale we'd need to hit is something like a million times more power than the LHC can produce. Absolutely absurd energy levels. But we know those energy levels exist - we can see them in black holes and magnetars and other massive cosmological objects, and scientists are certainly trying to collect as much information from those objects as they can in hopes that something will lead to a new theory. We don't exactly get to control a black hole the way we can control the LHC though, so we're stuck just waiting on luck to lead the way and give us an appropriately interesting observation. That could be a long wait (but perhaps not as long as waiting to build a 10^6x larger ring collider!)
Back here on Earth the only real hope is that someone finds a way to generate extremely high energy outputs with a significantly lower energy input than our current linear or ring colliders can manage. If we ever do find a true room-temperature superconductor for example we'll be able to get a lot closer very quickly as much of the energy input on current accelerators is the cryogenics required to maintain superconductivity in the magnets. I'm not sure that alone would get us all the way to a 10^6 boost but it would likely be a good order or two of magnitude closer. (Of course no one knows yet if such a thing is even possible - there's certainly a lot of hope still as the recent LK-99 fiasco showed - but hype alone is certainly no proof.)
@@captainwatson Trouble is, "I think" doesn't lead to testable predictions (and usually doesn't even cover the data we've already collected from the couple centuries of experiments we've already done).
Everybody has a thought on the matter (or two or three or ten), myself included. Few people put enough effort into their thoughts to convert them from random musings into actual scientific hypotheses. Fewer still have the ability (or simply funding) to test their hypotheses with real experiments.
And at the end of the day, the experiments are what really matter - to paraphrase Neil deGrasse Tyson: Nature is under no obligation to make sense to us. Its certainly convenient when it does, but that rarely occurs when we're dealing with scales far outside human experience so we can't rely solely on intuition - we have to prove to ourselves (and to others) that our intuition is actually correct. And be willing to discard our intuition should the experiments prove us wrong.
@@altragI don’t agree. A researcher friend of mine who studies quantum physics told me a very funny analogy. Think of the universe like a video game, where the trees and backgrounds in sections of the map that the player cannot enter are visible but if the player were to somehow reach those background locations it would be rendered poorly because the game makers did not expect the player to ever get there. This is exactly how God made the universe - it has some inherent ‘contradiction’ baked into its very existence such that when you reach the quantum level you find that God was too lazy to ‘render’ things because he thought humans were too stupid to reach that level. That’s the essence of quantum probability. Even though this is obviously a humorous analogy, I think there’s a deep truth to accepting that contradiction is inherent and maybe even necessary for the existence itself of our universe. To make you think, consider how everything (logically) must have a cause and effect - what is the cause of all causes then? I’d say this is the fundamental contradiction of existence itself from a philosophical standpoint, and it is the starting point for belief in God (or whatever you wanna call it, just know some of the greatest scientists of all mankind understood that science cannot and will never explain everything not because of human limitations but because God himself made the universe incomplete)
@@aumi5958 > Think of the universe like
You're already doing it wrong. One of the big "problems" with quantum mechanics is that it doesn't work "like" anything we've ever experienced on a human scale. We can analogize all we want but every analogy will break down because there simply is nothing truly analogous in anything we can experience. That's why the math is so important when coming up with theories - human brains just don't have the capability to "I think" our way to the answer.
(Heck even things we can experience we do pretty poorly on with "I think", historically speaking. Look at any number of theories of the universe or biology or basically anything other than pure geometry from the ancient Greek world where they believed experimentation was beneath them and reason alone could answer the questions of the universe.)
> This is exactly how God made the universe
You can't understand quantum mechanics, but you understand how God made the universe? That's an impressive gap.
> God was too lazy
I don't have a witty response. Roasting God requires none.
> That’s the essence of quantum probability.
Its really not. Even if you want to go with a creator theory, the creator is also under no obligation to make sense to you. What makes you believe that God is just as bad at probability than we are? Perhaps He didn't design it that way out of laziness, but because He understands something about it that you simply don't?
> consider how everything (logically) must have a cause and effect
Why? Who says that has to be true? It certainly appears to be true, but that is not the same as saying it must be true. One can absolutely imagine universes where this is not the case (and there is lots of sci-fi doing exactly that). If we mere mortals can imagine it there's no reason to believe God couldn't have created it and just decided not to.
> what is the cause of all causes then?
Who knows. But not knowing something doesn't mean its not knowable with enough investigation. And not knowable also doesn't mean not true. Whether you believe in one of the myriad creation stories various cultures and religions have invented over the millennia, or you believe one of the various creation stories physics has cooked up over the past century, there are only two options: Either _something_ was the cause of all causes, or the universe is truly infinite in time (and maybe space).
We have no way of knowing which of those generalizations is true, never mind which specific cause (in the first case) is true. But there is no third option so it must be one of those. We certainly have theories that we prefer to believe for various philosophical reasons, but philosophy is not physics. Believing in something is not the same as proving it.
> some of the greatest scientists of all mankind understood
Less than everything. Nobody has perfect knowledge of all subjects. See all the physicists and geologists making absolutely idiotic claims about biology and medicine during covid. And even if they somehow had perfect knowledge of every field, that still doesn't tell us anything because no field of study - religious, philosophical or scientific - has the answer yet, so perfect knowledge of all of those things still doesn't provide it and not even the greatest, smartest person in all of history can know something they don't know.
"Yet" is an extremely important qualifier though. We may find a theory of everything tomorrow. We may find it 1000 years from now. We may never find it. The only thing we can say for sure is that we haven't found it yet.
As a retired Respiratory Therapist i have always thought that pressure differentials are the key to every thing. Take the vibrating strings of string theroy each vibration, yes creates a frequency, but it must also create a pressure diffrence simply by the vibration. Change the temperature, pressure, or volume and you change everything withen the system. The more you change the vibration by say increasing the vibration of the string you increase the temperature which also changes the frequency. And so on as you change any one of the variables.
Just a thought.
It's fun to see people on YT trying to solve the Universe, it feels encouraging to see such knowledge being so easily accessible.
While I have my own interpretation of the Universe, it is just that - an interpretation of what is being observed, how it may work. To make a new theory, a new and measurable prediction should be made, one that contradicts existing theories' predictions. And that's the hard part - we've explained away as much as we can observe (so far). So... that's that part I'm looking forward to
Fantastic, I am compelled to keep this story going. I love listening to the ideas and I'm also loving the idea that one day our species will know the answers (if we don't destroy ourselves).
Thank you so much! I love the quantum physics videos. I really appreciate someone who is way smarter than I am taking the time to explain and show me the workings of the universe. Thanks, James.
This is my favorite video so far from you Astrum! It's so inspiring. I'm very interested in seeing more...
Super sir love from India Karnataka I am basically mechanical engineer but I learnt a lot about universe. I am so glad that I find your channel.
I love the way people can communicate globally. I am both excited and nervous to see where AI takes us in making these connections more real.
Thank you for delivering high quality content. There’s so many physics and space channels but honestly, this is one of the best.
No it really isn’t. It’s laden with mistakes. The author doesn’t himself have an accurate enough understanding of existing theories to be able to teach them to you let alone make up his own. Go and watch PBS Spacetime or Fermilab. Those guys are qualified professional academics.
@@ralphclarkdon’t forget @CoolWorlds … By far and away the best!!!
Can you be a bit more specific when you say "mistakes"@@ralphclark
@@openboxtherapy1010 do you understand the phrase “not even wrong”?
I can't wait for the next one, I'm absolutely excited to see where your musings have taken you! (Also: That was easily the clearest explanation of string theory I've ever seen, well done!)
I want to hear more of this, so please continue, quickly!
I love your videos, keep up the good work!
Is time really a dimension for light tho? Because traveling at the speed of light means your not advancing in time. A photon traveling billions of light years happens instantly from the photons perspective
Hey Astrum, Iove the implications of your theory, I expect it will perfectly describe your other theory about why c is the limit using higher dimensional spaces and the expansion of the universe. It is so elegant!
Are you planning on releasing a scientific paper on this matter? I would love to read it and check the mathematics for myself!
Hi Alex, thank you for this great introduction . I’m just a curious person, but I’m following so far. Can’t wait to hear more.
Amazing explanation.
Thanks for this excellent video 🎉🎉🎉
I'm looking forward to hearing more. It occurs to me that 'vibrating strings' need only be an analogy or convenient handle to help decipher some property of matter we may never be able to fully comprehend. Rather like we give particles properties like 'spin' or 'colour'. They have nothing to do with spin or colour in the macro verse but help us to describe properties that we test and predict.
Been laying in bed thinking about it. I dont think its strings, but whatever force that makes them vibrate may be the key
Science creates models to explain mathematics.
It's just fancy math. String theory makes no falsifiable predictions, it's not science.
Another great one, I always really enjoy your videos!
very interesting! looking forward to more of your discussion, a very enjoyable and well done channel as so many have pointed out. gravity, entropy, time, particles, quanta, quantum uncertainty, black holes-- I will look at them daily until I figure out how they all tie and in let you know what I come up with on your next video ;) take care Alex/Astrum
Love me a new Astrum video on a Sunday afternoon
💫🙏
Right in time for a good nights sleep. Thank you, Mr. Astrum
Subbed to see part 2 - I am SO here for this!!
I absolutely love your streams. I have had a fascination with space since I saw my first pictures of Mars when I was 7. Thank you for hour easy to follow explanations
I not a scienctist , rather a creative thinker. I love to write stories from the things I have learnt, both about natural science and social sci. and illustrate them in text books. And it's insane, the fact that I have came to a similar conclusion/theory of how the universe functions. I recently (just a couple of days ago - no joke), think about a sort hyper-realistic field, in which a singular confriguration exists. There are 3 things exist in that con. A medium, that acts as a fluctuative dimension, which can change it's extermities from axis 0 to higher dimensional axis. (Or in our world, a 3 dimensional -xyz axis). A fluctuative-patterned loop that act like manifestation of the energy within, and this is the thing that determine what came to be according to it's output stage. And of course, the (I just call it), the clouds of energy, from which matters is converted. And in my story, the arrival of a 4th element into the equation (I call it the Canvas), a space time field, onto which the previous 3 can emanate their existence, in forms of forces, photons and all matter. I take inspiration from (don't shout at me Ok?) from the old texts of the Bibles. In it, God is depicted as 3 rings tangled together, surrouded by the Seraphim, the Cherubim, and the Throne. When added my own knowledge in natural science (I was a Science Major Stu. btw), I was like: WHAT IF, The Seraphims (the firey angel), is a creative, symbolic parabel of energy? The Cherubim, (the 4 headed angel), is a repentation of dimensions, and the Thrones (the wheel thingyies, I don't know man) is the state of movement of God (aka. The loops). I literally have just written that down a week ago, for my new fantasy world build project. I have so many ideas, and I was shocked, amazed and was over the top, when I watched the videos about Quantum Physics through the week, as many of my concepts are actual-based science. Well, I know it's just an imaginative/creative interpretation of myself. But I'm so innovated in writing the complete stories now. ^^
P.s. Thank you for the information you have provided. Great videos, and I love your illustrations. Regards.
Wow I wish I was smart like u
The fact we have evolved from primitive hunter-gatherers to being able to even contemplate such things is a miracle in itself.
That is just the narrative you've been told. And it's nonsense from A to Z.
@@RenoLaringo What's your evidence for that claim? Because if your counter narrative involves Eden, Atlantis, or Aliens, then it's just the same boring nonsense we've all heard. But if you have something more interesting then people might like to know.
@@RenoLaringo It's also what has been discovered by scientists and archeologists and geologists, so I don't know what to tell you there buddy...
@@Skaevsno it hasn’t. You’ve just been lied to. Look up gap theory
@@Arcadianx98 that has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read, and it totally explains the religious mindset. You actually have to a literal imbecile to think that makes sense. Absence of evidence in no way proves God's existance, it just means we don't know something yet, just like we didn't know so many things in the past that we know now and the answer was never God.
Gap theory is a desperate example of wishful thinking and information bias. You're so desperate for God to be real, that when things are again and again proven to have nothing to do with God, you start seeking gaps where God *could* be. That's not logical, that's incredibly soufght after and wishful thinking.
What I said about science and archeology remains true.
Love the content from you guys, Ive been watching everything you put out latly. Space is so fastenating, I think im going to pick a telescope up my self. I've often said that I am kind of sad that I was born so early because we are going to miss out on so much discovery and exploration. Anyway keep up the great content, I cant wait for part 2. You guys should do a update video on Betelgeuse, I've heard that scientist think its going to go much sooner than anticipated. ( Sorry if you have covered this already lol)
I'd love to watch an entire series on a grand unified theory. This one was really interesting.
One of the easiest to understand videos on this topic. Concise but patient with the general audience!
Keep in mind that in this video he is explaining his interpretation of what's going on, rather than trying to explain something that all scientists generally agree on.
I very much anticipate watching the next video as you develop your idea further. The whole area is so complext that it will take repeated viewings of your videos, but your illustrations make it all much easier to try and visualise relationship for which I don't have the maths to express in equations. Thank you.
Please keep these great videos coming. I LOVE THEM!
If the answer _doesn't_ turn out to be 42, I shall be very disappointed.
I always thought it was interesting how the micro resembles the macro but on a much faster timescale.
Wow!! This is a fantastic video! It explained some of the most complex theoretical ideas in such an articulate way, and I will be forcing my family and friends to watch and appreciate it too!! Well done!
Love this channel! Keep sharing your ideas :)
I've heard that these days string theory is much less popular among physicist than it used to be, could you go into why in the next video?
Supersymmetry was not found at the LHC. SS is a big feature of many string theory models.
He did go into it in this video
It’s seen more as a stepping stone into the next big theory.
Watch acollierastro’s video on string theory - basically string theorists are unable to produce bc of the unprovability, but continue to make promises of a breakthrough that they can’t keep
Regarding mass being a different "direction" of travel, I would suggest the term "mode" of travel, in the same way that angular momentum is a different "mode" of momentum from linear momentum. Rotation and precession could be thought of as analogs for some of the characteristics of massive particles, a way of storing part of their momentum cyclically in a relatively fixed location.
Mass and time are both dimensions. A velocity (or vector) change in one dimension changes the values of the others. That's why velocity in time changes when things have a high velocity in our familiar three dimensions or are very massive. It's also why our three dimensions change their shape around massive objects. It's all described in Einstein's math. Even earlier, Lorentz described how high speed in one dimension changes that dimension's shape. Einstein went on to explain that mass changes in that case, as well. Lorentz's work showed that even our most familiar three dimensions are affected by motion, although they act a little weird in that only the traveled dimension seems to be changed, (at least in one respect,) and not the perpendicular ones.
It may be possible that extra dimensions are responsible for entanglement - that idea would be strengthened if we can prove that it is possible to force a particular state on one half of an entangled pair. I haven't studied that branch of science. But it would eliminate the "spooky action at a distance" argument.
Angular momentum is linear momentum being acted upon by tension from a central point. That is why it can easily be converted from one to the other.
I like what I see so far. Interested in seeing where you take it. I think when people talk about dimensions and directions, it makes everyone consider the underlying oscillations spatially ... even though we have trouble visualizing higher than 3 dimensions spatially. Maybe its easier to just think of them as additional properties whose values can oscillate independently of the other properties.
Thanks for the video. Amazing work, as always. In your next video, are you going to explain quantum field theory? It's another top contender for the title.
I’m a total novice, however, I obsess over this stuff. I’ve been doing it for years, obsessing. Your explanation of e=mc^2 as an expression of a ratio of time blew my mind. I sheepishly admit that I never thought to break down C as a ratio of distance over time. Whatever, my ignorance is neither here nor there. What is meaningful is that your explanation illuminated that dim lightbulb in my crayon eating mind…thank you!
Me too :)
what was the ratio?
I’ve read several books on relativity, physics, astrophysics & quantum physics. I think I understood quantum physics more before I read the books!
You are not alone! The famous physicist Richard Fainman says "Nobody understands Quantum Mechanics if somebody says that he understands it I will call him a charlatan" ...but I think that I can help you understand it. There is a simple book for which academia doesn't want to talk about. Its title is - "Theory of Everything in Physica and The Universe" Read it and then everything will start make sense.
@@valentinmalinov8424 my first response to you has been removed by the CZcams marxists, I must have used a word that triggered them. I’ve ordered your book!
Great job. It's the first time I really felt I got it. Good step-by-step explanation. Thanks!
Cant wait to hear more. Hearing about existing science is brilliant and informative but new ways of thinking are always welcome in my CZcams feed
I love physics, the thing I love most about it is, there's so much we don't know. It's a mystery or a code to be cracked. There's something very special about certain frequencies of sounds or vibrations. That create amazing things.
Mix up:
Grand unified Theory = unifies 3 quantum force (strong, with electro and weak)
Theory of everything = unifies all 4 forces (gravity, strong, electro, and weak)
I don't think there is any such thing as gravity to be honest. I think gravity is just an illusion that emerges out of the bending of space time, or even just time itself. :)
Such a cool approach right here!
Keep going bro 😍
Fascinating ideas amigo!!! Great video!!!!😀
As a non-mathematical person, I've only really have a vague idea of what String Theory was. This is the first time I actually have a layman's grasp of what it is.
I feel dumber after watching this. 😢
The thumbnail for this video is fantastic! Awesome new content, Alex! 🎉❤
I love your theory thus far, and it makes a lot of sense to me!!! I find this topic absolutely fascinating, and while I am not a physicist, science has been my life (Clinical Laboratory). Keep the ideas coming!!
How to say a lot without saying anything at all
Haha...the only actual "unifying theory" is death.
Death wouldn’t be a theory… it would be a law. It’s factually proven to happen no matter its condition.
I recently bought my first house and played all your videos while I painted the rooms and did some minor repair over the course of two months before fully moving in. Your videos are the best and are now forever part of my memory of my new home. I was born and raised in Hawaii but moved away. This video is so fitting for me to finally have made a comment with a Hawaiian name given to the super cluster. Thank you.
Interesting point of start the argument, looking forward for the next chapter, thanks for sharing your point of view and rationalized such of uncomprehensive expance!
Investing now in crypto should be in every wise individuals list, in some months time you'll be ecstatic with the decision you made today. The Inflation is killing me prices is killing us all. The money made is not enough to sort everything out and the family. What we need is a lucrative business or investment. And I just did and very proud I did!!
Most intelligent words I've heard. The government has nothing to offer, you’re Actually right but can you help me out with some hints you sounded like you have experience.
I wanted to invest or buy a share but got discouraged by the fluctuations in price, without the knowledge you will lose money probably all your money.
I perceive her strategies are really perpetually, I have also heard of her on investmentcon now I’m convinced. Because I never knew I’ll come across people talking about Von.
Von was obviously the best I invested with her and I have made a profit of 3times of my investment
Her success stories are everywhere
I'm a living testimony of Mrs Von Amelia
Investing my money with Expert Mrs Von has being a game changer for me.
How do i get in touch with her?
I can't wait for the next video. I've never studied physics, so I've always wondered what the second power contained in e=mc² means.
Hello, first of all I am not a physicist but I would like to give a try on the interpretation of c^2. Let's start from distance (m), then we have velocity (m/s), then we have acceleration of an object in one dimension (m/s^2). Now we may be stuck but... an area is in m^2 units. Is it something like it's an acceleration of an area (m^2/s^2)? Quite an abstract concept, but maybe not that stupid...?
I'd also like to add that E=mc^2 is just a simplification of a more general equation. Because if photon has no mass, it couldn't have energy, but it does! And that source of its energy is momentum. If I'm not wrong, the full equation is: E=sqrt(p^2m^2+m^2c^4)
Hey Alex. I was thinking about time being a 4th dimension this past week and love that I came up. Should we find a way to lift the veil on time and reveal that it is indeed a dimension, I wonder if that's the key to opening the window on finding the 5th dimension, if it exists. So on and so forth. Please continue this series!
I love your channel! Keep up the good work!
It's interesting so far for sure. I am still feeling a bit skeptical, but I am looking forward to the next videos to see where you are going with it.
That's very interesting. I have always found it really appealing myself that everything could be explained with extra dimensions. Looking forward for the next videos!
Your intuition is bringing you very close to the truth. If you want to find the details, just find the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"
@@valentinmalinov8424 ok, thanks. i will
I have never encountered so good explanation of physics as yours! Thank you very much!
I am curious for the direction you are taking us Alex. Always had the feeling we need to really think out of the box (the one we're existing in) to explain it all. A direction my thoughts are wandering is the consideration of scale itself being a dimension, orthogonal to space.
I would have been happy with a 4 hr video 😂 now i cant wait for the next episode
In stead of strings, why not bubbles. You did say " we cant see these strings, they are so small they look like points to us" a single " so small" bubble might just look like a point. A bubble can form waves when vibrated, they are spherical, so that should account for all dimensions, (or at least as far as I can think) and when bunched together you get so many other shapes that can push in so many other directions.
I'm not a scientist but it does make more sense in my head.
So far so good. Keep going. Roadblocks ahead, can’t wait to see your thoughts. Please make a playlist on this as well.
As always.... absolutely amazing content.
I've thought about this a lot. It'd be great to hear your thoughts on it.
Hey man! Your visuals are amazing‼️
I'm impressed that you dare to take on this great question and to try to explain it in layman terms. Inspiring.
Some really dislike when people try doing things like that
@@BrandonMcCurry999 The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.
Such a soothing voice! Awesome video man! Thank you so much!
Incredible video. I was never able to understand why C was squared until I watched this, and it makes PERFECT sense.
I like the visualization at 14:07, spirals are underrated in science for some reason
Your videos are a work of art 😊
Dam you, I've been laying in bed thinking about that equation. I've written my thoughts down. And now I need to test it out
I appreciate your idea and it's certainly worth elaborating on and exploring. That's a large part of what life's about; consciousness.
its fascinating and i would love to hear more.
I look forward to you exploring this. (and me watching)
Thanks for doing this series Alex! I love learning more about the essence of the universe.
On E=mc2, does your interpretation mean that mass is essentially trapped kinetic energy? Like a photon that has no mass, gains mass when trapped in a massless photon box?
The photon is such a weird little critter. It's like the universe tries to trick us with a "We think we have it worked out, then the photon gotcha gets thrown in" lol
That little photon has cost me endless hours of my life lol
Excellent video 😃 next part should come quickly 🙂.
i honestly wouldnt be surprised if we never really found the theory of everything - cause i believe the moment we could understand it, it reveals something even more confusing
So, this giant tangled ball of holiday lights wasn't like this when I put it away last January. I am blaming String Theory. 😉 Thanks, Alex! Very well done, Sir!
General relativity and quantum mechanics will never be combined until we realize that they take place at different moments in time. Because causality has a speed limit (c) every point in space where you observe it from will be the closest to the present moment. When we look out into the universe, we see the past which is made of particles (GR). When we try to look at smaller and smaller sizes and distances, we are actually looking closer and closer to the present moment (QM). The wave property of particles appears when we start looking into the future of that particle. It is a probability wave because the future is probabilistic. Wave function collapse happens when we bring a particle into the present/past. GR is making measurements in the predictable past. QM is trying to make measurements of the probabilistic future.
We need a theory that will also account for consciousness, but a lot a physicists seem to forget about that.
Totally agree with your comment, consciousness once (if ever) being understood is the key to the Universe.
Already, in the intro there appears to be some confusion. Special relativity and quantum mechanics play very nicely together, as in the Dirac equation. It's general relativity that conflicts with quantum mechanics.
I love it every time someone covers this and presents their own take and ideas on a potential Grand Theory of Everything.
I like where your heading with this ;) keep going
I love when you do these theoretical videos
Ooh, so looking forward to the next instalment
I do truly think about these things all the time, even going to sleep. I wonder how its all connected right down to the quantum level. I am no scientist, just an average person, but I do ponder a lot about the cosmos and all its strange magic.
Great stuff as always! Can't wait for the next one and your conclusions.
I still think a discreet foundation makes sense, a 4D Penrose tiled crystal with massive particles being persistent defects that emit converging space. Too many hours playing with fractals on the computer!
Having not delved into string theory itself, superficially, it seems like a simplistic way of modeling reality rather than being reality in itself. Like modeling the attractive force of two magnets, their fields are actually interacting in 3d space, but it simpler to draw a vector and a single force to describe it.