May sell better at $98.00 price point after all observations I made. Thank you for your outstanding reviews which are quite comprehensive and never boring..!
Great review of a superb looking watch. I might go for the date version. I agree with your observations about the unsigned crown and clasp - maybe a stylish but discrete M ? I'm not at all fussed about backplay on bezels - do people buy these divers to go diving with, or play with whilst sitting at their desks? I have several divers, and hardly ever fiddle with the bezel! Thanks again! ❤
Great review. I believe the 9×9mm glide lock clasps will work with this oyster bracelet. Thinking of buying the monochrome version then upgrading it to the glide lock clasp.
Would be nice to undercut some others with a 9000 series or PT5000 movement and keep the price about the same. I could live with its current t downsides if it had the hi beat option.
I really like the look of the watch and yes although it is a copy/homage of the Tudor BB I think they made this before Tudor released their monochrome. Obviously it’s not as well made as the Tudor but how much difference is there between the 2 in quality
@watchthepoint1604 Hmm... At 1 meter distance - not much, however at a close inspection... 🤔😁 There is a reason why a lot of watch enthusiasts consider Tudor a great value brand, it does cost about 30 times more though 🙂 Thank you for watching! 🙂👍
Another cracking watch especially with the gilt markers. Luckily for my bank balance I am sticking with my decision to only buy quartz in 35 to 38 mm cases from now on.
I don’t dive and I use the timer on my phone to time things, so the only thing I need a bezel to do is line up at 12:00. It’s never going to be intentionally moved. If a watch movement has a date position, it should have a date window, end of story. No date? Use an NH38. Why is that so hard? BTW, I love your channel!
This model is far from done watch. Color mismatch on hands and indices are so visible is it so hard to match it.. I would say need a lot improvements even for this price. There is other brands with better execution.
Thanks with your discount I paid only $119.00 USD. Another good revi
May sell better at $98.00 price point after all observations I made. Thank you for your outstanding reviews which are quite comprehensive and never boring..!
@user-ol5zr3pb9n Thank you for watching!
This watch needs improvement. Glad you pointed out the problems and didn't just overlook it.
@stephenmorrissey1254 Just doing my job :-) Thank you for watching! 😊👍
Great review of a superb looking watch. I might go for the date version. I agree with your observations about the unsigned crown and clasp - maybe a stylish but discrete M ? I'm not at all fussed about backplay on bezels - do people buy these divers to go diving with, or play with whilst sitting at their desks? I have several divers, and hardly ever fiddle with the bezel! Thanks again! ❤
Great review. I believe the 9×9mm glide lock clasps will work with this oyster bracelet. Thinking of buying the monochrome version then upgrading it to the glide lock clasp.
Would be nice to undercut some others with a 9000 series or PT5000 movement and keep the price about the same. I could live with its current t downsides if it had the hi beat option.
More polishing around the sharp edge minimal areas would give it another .5 in points
This looks like a white labeled version of the SN004 V2 limited edition watch dived San Martin collab no?
Along with this watch I also own 2 x SN004 V2's and I have to say the case looks identical.
I really like the look of the watch and yes although it is a copy/homage of the Tudor BB I think they made this before Tudor released their monochrome. Obviously it’s not as well made as the Tudor but how much difference is there between the 2 in quality
@watchthepoint1604 Hmm... At 1 meter distance - not much, however at a close inspection... 🤔😁 There is a reason why a lot of watch enthusiasts consider Tudor a great value brand, it does cost about 30 times more though 🙂 Thank you for watching! 🙂👍
The bezel resistant seems to be in more resistant that it should be. I give the watch a 6 out of 10. Hopefully I am not been too critical.
How can you rate it without having it in hand
Great review of the Militado watch. I like the watch you presented friend however I would prefer a 39.5 or 40 mm dimension on this again watch..
At this price, it’s hard to complain, but I think it would better hit the mark at 12mm or less thick.
Another cracking watch especially with the gilt markers. Luckily for my bank balance I am sticking with my decision to only buy quartz in 35 to 38 mm cases from now on.
I would REALLY like a rivet bracelet on my Watchdives BB54 though...
Damn look soo good, unfortunatly this color has no date window version 😢
Beautiful!
Great review, as always.
I wait for the new and improved version by San Martín!
No signed crown fix that clasp deal breaker for me 😢
This looks like the same case as the Corguet and Thorn.
Please Review the new san Martin retro gmt SN0109-G2
I don’t dive and I use the timer on my phone to time things, so the only thing I need a bezel to do is line up at 12:00. It’s never going to be intentionally moved. If a watch movement has a date position, it should have a date window, end of story. No date? Use an NH38. Why is that so hard? BTW, I love your channel!
This model is far from done watch. Color mismatch on hands and indices are so visible is it so hard to match it.. I would say need a lot improvements even for this price. There is other brands with better execution.
I have never liked the BB58; wish they had done Pelagos with this monochrome scheme instead.
@klstay Let's hope Militado reads these comments 😊 Thank you for watching! 🙂👍
I love my San Martin Pelagos SN0121GA in blue no date.
Love the hands but very boring case.
It's a bit overpriced