CASINO (1995) - Exposing the Weaknesses of Scorsese
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 07. 2021
- Website: www.deepfocuslens.com
Support me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/deepfocuslens...
Follow me on instagram: / deepfocuslens
Follow me on twitter: / deepfocuslens
Like my Facebook page: / deepfocuslens
Email me: deepfocuslens@gmail.com
#casino #scorsese #deepfocuslens - Krátké a kreslené filmy
To me, the genius of Scorsese's gangster movies is that the style is the substance. The frantic, chaotic nature of his films emphasize how brutal and repugnant the nature of the gangster really is.
The traditional gangster movie, like the godfather, was always depicted in a very Shakespearian way. The rise and fall and betrayals were always given extreme gravitas. This style choice, whether intentional or not, glamourized the gangster to the audience. Michael was a cunning strategist. Vito was the noble man of the people.
With Scorsese's gangster films, everything is presented in such a chaotic and darkly humorous manner that you lose the allure. There are no Michaels, Vitos or Toms in Scorsese's gangster movies. Just Sonnys and Fredos. The violence is more brutal. The clothes and decor are tacky. More importantly all the relationships are toxic.
You are correct sir
Michael Franzese said Goodfellas is one of the most accurate portrayals of mob life.
I agree, although the violence is definitely more brutal in The Godfather than Goodfellas.
@@brunoactis1104 really, shooting a guy in the eye is more brutal than repeatedly kicking him in the head?
"The Godfather" is *not* a traditional Gangster Movie. This is precisely the reason it completely transcended the genre and is included in almost everybody's list of the top movies of the 1970s--which is spectacular decade for movies.
I always viewed Casino as not so much a story about gangsters, but about how people wind up alone. De Niro tries to be as close to "normal" as a Vegas guy can be, but everyone else around him self-destructs and fail to take him with them.
I love De Niro’s outfits in Casino.
...and he kept all of them. :)))
In the desert meeting scene the reflection of Joe Pesci's car on De Niro's sunglasses is priceless
True, excellent scene.
That scene is the highlight of the movie.
@@pleaserewind295Odd seeing you here. In any case just wanted to point out how it was symbolic of a bullet going through DeNiros head.
Robert Richardson's camera work definitely gives this movie a certain flare
I'm honestly jealous of how well-spoken you are. Your descriptive talent is so impressive and engaging to listen to. Love this channel so much. Thank you for keeping up the quality content and not just using this platform for selfish reasons. It's really refreshing to see a real person just talk. Kinda rare these days. I really appreciate all you do. Keep it up!
I love your reviews immensely. Even when I disagree with you, you always give a compelling argument and justify your reasonings. You never come off as rude or pretentious either. Keep up the wonderful work! By the way, I think Sharon Stone is masterful in this film. Cheers!
According to Michael Franzese its pretty inaccurate too.
"Bringing Out The Dead (1999)" is one of my favorite Scorsese movies.
BOTD definitely is an underrated movie imo 🍻
no one cares about accuracy
@@mabusestestament back when nic cage made good films
I think Marty's commentary on the American Dream was best portrayed in The King of Comedy.
SOOOO GOOD! My favourite Scorsese next to Taxi Driver and Raging Bull
Wasn't the scene of those dudes getting bludgeoned in the cornfield just the best thing you've ever seen ?
😕
The Behind the scenes ,Don Rickles roasting Robert De Niro is gold though.
"You with your method acting and the breathing and all the bullshit" Rickles was a titan for sure
This is easily my fav Scorsese movie. I love it more than Goodfellas. I think it's much more complex and nuanced. I like the performances better, the story. The sense of betrayal. I just think there's more to mine. It's messy but I think it's mess is apart of what Scorsese is going after.
“Goodfellas” is the better movie, but I find “Casino” to be much more watchable.
@@Wildcock23 Yeeeeeesssss!
Taxi Driver Is a timeless masterpiece tho
I applaud your honesty because GOODFELLAS is my favorite GANGSTER FILM of all TIME simply cause of its simplicity lol!
You just said the opposite of what she said and called it a day. Very useless comment.
I fall in love with the art of filmmaking all over again every time I see this film. Every frame is drenched in Scorsese. If you want to know what a great director, DP and editor can bring to any script, good or bad, watch Casino.
Loved James Woods in Casino though, very underrated actor
I feel the same way.
He's great.
@@deepfocuslens I'd highly recommend Oliver Stone's Salvador, where Woods plays the original dirt bag leftist (long before the guys from Chapo Trap House were even born).
@@stanleyrogouski
He’s rather based in real life.
@@stanleyrogouski Salvador is my favorite James Woods movie!!! And one of Oliver Stone’s best films as well.
Casino being my #1 favorite Scorsese, this should be interesting...
I think it handles its themes much more maturely than Goodfellas. It has a more singular tone, and I legitimately prefer the Joe Pesci of Casino over the Joe Pesci of Goodfellas. Also, no other movie uses "The House of the Rising Sun" better.
I agree. I prefer this over goodfellas personally.
Yes I preferred it to the Goodfellas.
People are very shallow. It is a very different film to Godfellas, other than on the very surface.
Factz Joe had more time to shine being the movie was 3 hours. "If someone slipped on a banana, they'll bring me in"
The mans still has so much passion for film even at his age now
I enjoy "Casino" over "Goodfellas" personally
Weirdly I find myself returning to Casino more often. But I think Goodfellas is by far the superior film.
@@deepfocuslens it's less familiar so it's probably more engaging in that sense but yes otherwise, Goodfellas is far superior.
I am with you. Can argue Casino over Goodfellas for hours.
Agreed while GoodFellas is probably the best of the life of a mobster genre ,I feel there are sooo many.
Casino is vastly different ,not really a mob film but the story of " Lefty Rosenthal" and also very much a Las Vegas story of those times.
@@rikaardyyz3039 an incredibly loose adaptation of the story though.
There’s a lot of Gilda (1946) in this film. I know Scorsese loves that one.
Is this your Oscar nominated performance? lol 14:39
Casino is a great film. I think it's one of Scorsese's best film in his resume. You really get a history of how these guys really operated illegally inside a casino. The main characters are very interesting and unforgettable. Scorsese uses a lot of filmmaking tools to draw the viewer in and lastly, it's really a sad tale of how they all (rightfully) fucked it all up. I agree with you on how Scorsese lacks interesting female characters/minorities but a filmmaker can't please everyone they just have to make the best film that they can
I personally like this better than goodfellas. Casino is the spiritual sequel to goodfellas in my opinion. But there's something about this I enjoy more. I know I will get criticized for saying that, even though I love goodfellas also.
It's just an opinion. It's about your own taste. No one can even tell you one is "greater" than the other because ultimately it's just your opinion.
This is, unquestionably in my opinion, the best film of all time. The mixed reaction this film has been given has absolutely stunned me, reviews range from the worst film people have ever seen to the most impressive they have ever seen. This is of course the most underrated film of all time and not enough credit has been given to Scorsese, De Niro, pesci, stone and even the supporting cast including frank Vincent. The reason for much of this films criticism is its comparisons to goodfellas. This is not goodfellas or a goodfellas inspired film! (despite Nicholas peliggi's involvement). De niro and pesci surpass their performance in goodfellas with much to spare in this film. Pesci in particular has added more venom to his performance than seen in goodfellas (which was already as venomous as a venomous snake swimming around in venom).
Enough of this goodfellas talk, casinos finest quality is the development of the characters throughout the movie. The decade in which this movie covers allows Scorsese to work his magic and has time to brilliantly lay out this fascinating tale of the mob's control of a las Vegas casino...and the las Vegas streets. De niro is at his usual best which means long time movie partner Scorsese can direct with ease because nobody is better than De niro at his best. His performance is cool, calm and collected and his character is easily likable and understandable throughout. De niro's casual performance means it is down do pesci to take care of the more brutal parts of the movie, and he does this very well. Scorseses directing skills combined with De niro's fine acting and laced with pesci's raw power, not to mention a sprinkle of glitter on top in the form of Sharon stone, means there is no level on which this film does not deliver. the best there is, the best there was and the best there ever will be.
The best film... Of all time?
It's great but... C'mon bro. You need to watch more movies.
@@buckhead40z Name a better movie
This is how I feel about Once Upon A Time In America, but Casino isn’t far behind.
@@defiscanner1927 Harakiri, Seven Samurai, Ikiru, Come and See, Paris Texas, Wings of Desire, The Godfather, The Good Bad and Ugly, 2001, There Will Be Blood. Casino isn’t even close to the best Scorsese, let alone the greatest movie of all time. You can say it’s your favorite all you want, but making an argument that it’s the greatest film ever made is absolutely absurd.
@@AssClapCowboy Lmao those movies you mention can't hold a candle to Casino. Casino felt so real you could mistake it for a documentary with real characters. No other movie even comes close
This may be an unpopular opinion, but I feel Carlito's Way is a better companion piece to Scarface than Casino is to Goodfellas. That was much less a rehash and could be seen as an antithesis, even. To me, Scorsese's biggest weakness is his occasional need to be unnecessarily convoluted and tangential. Not all of his "pictures" are like that, but when they are - they're REEEALLY committed to it. When he exercises some brevity, his profundities hit harder. I would like to see a reversal of 95% of film makers' innate need for creating grand and elaborate visions. The question I would like to see get answered in mainstream film is "How minimal can we get while still retaining the qualities of a thoughtful and well produced film?"
Agreed 💯 percent
I said this for years
@@PulseRELOADED I agree as well. Carlito's Way is so much better then scarface. "You no longer a lawyer, your a gangster now!"
Obviously that's YOUR opinion, but Casino is a million miles away from GoodFellas not so much a mob film but more a film about Vegas and " Lefty " in those times.
Most professional critics seem to love it and it averages out at the 5th best film he ever made.
But as I said it's personal opinion, I actually prefer it to GoodFellas as I feel that's a film that's been made again and again " once upon a time in America " etc although it IS the best of the " passage thru life mob films "...
Interesting analysis of the character of Ginger. I'm wondering how Sheryl Lee would have done in the role.
I can see that working quite well potentially.
I think Traci Lords and Madonna were originally considered. Sharon Stone was marvelous in the role i thought. She is Vegas just like Don Rickles.
You actually do all the good movies. I think I’m in love.
New viewer here and already a huge fan. I take your main critique of Casino very well, it's a very incisive point and I was tempted to agree, but IMHO the hypocrisy of Scorsese's opulence is baked into his aesthetic and part of what makes his movies compelling. From Charlie in Mean Streets onward his characters are entirely aware of the sin inherent in what they love. There's a line in an Ebert writing on Goodfellas that I love, I forget if it's the original review or where else it might be, in which the guilt of Scorsese's characters lies not the actions they commit, but that they would do them again.
Cape Fear exposes Scorsese's weaknesses. Casino's 3 hours feels like 2, and Cape Fear's approach was "What if everything's on the surface"
Do you watch all your movies on blu-ray? I'm new to your channel and don't know your opinion on streaming and physical media
Have you reviewed The Departed? I would love to hear your thoughts on that film
I love the obvious dummy when the car explodes. Pure class
Oh man. That always bothered me
What about the obvious dummy in Pesci's death scene?
@Tom Kretschmer I don’t see why they couldn’t cut from another angle it’s always bothered me. Not in any way that it ruins the movie but I would expect that from say Showdown In Little Tokyo or a Michael Winner film but Scorsese no way Jose.
@Tom Kretschmer well it was shown in glorious 35mm back then so what’s the excuse
I thought Stone was phenomenal in this film, down to her being in love with her life before marriage to DeNiro’s character. She married for money, then got used to the money and missed the excitement of her old but more authentic life, so she grew bored, dissatisfied with everything she got w/ the money. The housewife’s life, suburbia, her children, being a mom, monogamy etc. Her pimp was the road to her old exciting but unsustainable life.
"Tell me if you gambled and I'll give you the money to put the fuckin heat on!"
In the context of mob films women are ancillary. And that is accurate.
Whenever i watch any gangster movie - no matter what film culture it's from, I always look out for two character archetypes :
whether the "molly" character (villain's girlfriend or wife) or the conflicted henchman (villain's top assassin or "insurance") is able to "snap out of it" and eventually redeem themselves and the rest of the story.
Your point about people viewing Scorsese as the 'mob guy' is definitely true, and comes up all the time whenever I talk about his films with friends and family, but one thing that's always baffled me about the criticism (not your criticism, but the basic "another GoodFellas" critique) levelled against Casino, The Departed and The Irishman, is that nobody ever dares to attack Ozu or Kurosawa on these grounds. Kurosawa made a ton of samurai films, and Ozu always made gentle family dramas in that same very specific style that he developed independent of the traditional cinematic approach pioneered by Griffith and, while I'm a huge fan of his, a lot of those films do feel very similar. Why is this the case? Because the critiques of Scorsese are never particularly nuanced and seem to mostly amount to: "he's just remaking GoodFellas".
This film is abour greed and how excess in everything leads to a downfall. Wolf of Wall St. Is similar though far less darker. Casino changes it's time after the vise scene and then we start to feel that everything is evaporating before our eyes. The joys of Vegas suddenly become joyless.
Love it, not as much as Goodfellas. I think that Goodfellas has a better narrative and the "rise and fall" structure feels more natural and logical. Casino on a technical level is better, and i love the story, characters, the acting is amazing, the 3 hour runtime never bothered me, but the major issue that i have with the film is the fall. Specially, the way that one of the characters practically reveals everything. It felt forced and not believable. Beyond that, i think it´s amazing and i would suggest checking it out.
I would love to see you review The Last Temptation of Christ.
The best part of that movie is the soundtrack which was expanded on the album. It was a very important project that had very real implications for connecting disparate top level musicians of the so called "world" genre.
faxx
@@funoolesbian4225 well yeah and it's PETER FUCKING GABRIEL behind the music!!! Wonderful guy and wonderful musical visionary. Absolutely love him. It was doing the music for TLTOC that out of that came my favorite solo album of his: Us.
Very interesting perspective on the film. I haven't seen this one since my first viewing, so this review will certainly play in the back of my head
I got totally confused until you finally mentioned Sharon Stone:
for some reason, this whole time I thought you were talking about Elizabeth Shue in "Leaving Las Vegas"!
Both movies only have mildly similar themes, but I got them mixed up just because they both came out in 1995!
Lived in Vegas ‘68 till ‘96. Ace Rothstein is loosely based on Lefty Rosenthal, that had a weekly show on Friday night. “Stardust Line” Sportsbook betting odds. Crazy times. Love your show.
The problem concerning "The Godfather" is that viewers forget that they are "identifying" with a violent criminal mob family.
Saw it at the cinema on a packed, first weekend. The scene in the desert, on the big screen brought out a huge laugh when they were revealed to be so small, compared to the desert. Great moment.
I often wondered if the real-life gangsters that were portrayed in Goodfellas ever crossed paths with the real-life gangsters of Casino during one of their Vegas trips.
Goodfellas will always be #1. Casino is definitely in the hall of fame, sitting right next to Goodfellas, respectfully. I’m in love with the mob genre. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. 👏🏼
Scorsese isn't aware enough of the fact that film is always a manipulative art. That's really well put and might very well be the reason why I struggle with most of his work.
I heard Scorsese originally wanted Pacino to play the lead role. But because of scheduling he went back to De Niro. I think De Niro is great in the role, but maybe Pacino getting the part instead would’ve helped it feel a bit different than Goodfellas
Interesting you review Casino did you see ever see the Siskel and Ebert review when Roger really liked it and Gene gave it a thumbs down it was a fascinating review. For the record i really like Casino but i do agree it is a mixed bag and not on the level of GoodFellas
@HiveRobot it seems like your an expert, Mark
@HiveRobot thats not true at all, there are plenty of films he didnt like you obviously didnt see many of his reviews
interested in your review of David Chase's Sopranos...especially season 6a/6b.
Casino is one of my favorites from Scorsese body of work. Never had any problem with Sharon Stone performance. I think she is pretty convincing in this role and she creates an exact type of character.
There are ZERO weaknesses of Scorsese.
Absolutely.
Plz make a review of After Hours too. Great review. My fav Scorcese movies. Are. Goodfellas, Casino, Taxi Driver and After Hours. I think it is really underrated and a masterpiece.
@Tom Kretschmer I don’t wan’t any entertainment
i loved after hours darkcomedy but classic
@@timothybenn313 I love it too, definitely one of my fav movies.
@@shazid1891 the cheech and chong ending always cracks me up poor guy gets tlenfall out of van right back at work as in shit lol
He almost painted himself in a corner with "Casino" but I loved his film "Silence."
@@davideoliveirapinheiro1096 I find with films like "Silence", Scorsese is obviously trying to imitate Bernardo Bertolucci, but couldn't quite get there.
A lot of well-articulated points - many of which I had not considered. I think it was easy for Scorsese to get caught up in the afterglow of Goodfella's success. To me, that seemed like a film where everything kinda just went right. One thing to consider from the perspective of the creator is how much that level of creative synchronicity can impact you and the people involved. I can only assume he wanted to recapture the experience - and you can tell he had a blast doing it. So while it may have very much revisited the ground that Goodfellas established - there is still an uninhibited joy and love of process that sits at the core of the film.
You right about Ms Stone. Ginger is how do they say? “Cra Cra.” We never know why. We just see her acting that way.
Scorcese says his ""The Age of Innocence" is his most violent film.
3:45 I too feel this way about Gangs of New York as well. To me, the film showed the tribalistic nature of humanity but it never analyzed that tribalism or offered a perspective on it. Gangs then felt flat and one-dimensional to me. Sure the ending offers a conclusion to their tribalism but Scorsese doesn’t offer much else in the way of exploration of the theme
Totally agree. Scorsese is one of my favourites and I'm often hesitant to criticize him, but I did find it incredible that the same guy that made movies like Taxi Driver and Raging Bull, managed to churn out Gangs of New York. It's a film with interesting and important themes ripe for exploration, like you mentioned, but just never goes there and often feels like a cookie-cutter blockbuster. If you told me Spielberg directed it, I'd believe you lol.
Wow. Fantastic point about these “cautionary tales” that likely arent going to get someone to look within themself
You wont believe how many people believe Scorsese made the godfather lmao
Sure enough, Stone was Oscar nominated for this role. Go figure.
Because she's real good in it
Because she was really amazing i dont get why Maggie thought she was bad i disagree with that totally. It was an amazing performance
When I watched Casino I felt like the whole film was an introduction to a film, I remember after about an hour of having an expectation for the introduction to end and the film to begin properly that this was how the film was.
Would you say in terms of acting, Sharon Stone had no..... Basic instinct?😃
Wow ive never heard someone say Sharon Stone wasnt good in Casino..she was brilliant in this film
I honestly always liked her performance. You actually get to hate her more than even Joe Pesci's character. At least he cared for his kids. She kidnaps and ties hers up! 😂
I thought she was the best part of the entire film which is pretty impressive considering the company she's in
This movie is really the turning point for Scorsese where he stopped writing his own stuff and just leaned into adapting books about criminals. I also agree he really started blurring the lines with over romanticizing these gangster types. I would love to hear your thought on Mean Streets, that’s my favorite of his mafia movies where it’s more honest and doesn’t lionize the characters.
I love Casino. I like it more than Goodfellas.
I often find myself going "Yeah it's great, but it's just like ______!" and I wish I didn't.
as I get older I find myself having a much harder time defending the idea of decrying a truly good thing for being like something else. quality modern media should be cherished and valued, even if it's not always breaking new ground. it's like you said - most stories have been done before. or so we believe, anyway.
but when Scorsese leaves us - God help us, but it's got to be coming soon enough - I doubt we're going to be saying a whole lot about how he was repeating himself, here. the high quality of a thing can and should stand apart from what came before it.
Casino is certainly not Goodfellas by any stretch.
Do they contain similar actors and directorial style? Sure.
Casino is a mature and reserved Scorcese. The details - from the script, cinematography, pace/texture, even costumes - in the film go far beyond the supposed 'flash or glorification' you've mentioned.
Very interesting take! I might watch Casino but I have a bad feeling it’s going to feel too much like Goodfellas.
I mean it wouldn’t be believable if De Niro lived a modest life in this movie. I think it’s natural for these characters to be gaudy it shows how their greed got the best of them they had to show the greed and opulence to make the movie believe-able and realistic to the characters
To be honest, sharon was already 36 or 37 when they made the movie.
I was surprised by the Sharon stone criticism. I started watching casino when I was so youngish that I’d never have even thought to criticize any of the acting really. Yr criticism helped me think through something that never occurred to me until it made me disagree w u. I say stone, maybe just by accident via not great acting or what have u, is very good here at being a presence that is always a beat behind whatever facade she is trying to put on at any given time. To me, and I only just realized it now, this made the movie so much more realistic, as this is how many people often are: slightly disjointed from themselves, as it were. I didn’t see over acting, I saw the stone character clumsily over acting when trying to get what she wanted. It always made the movie very documentary like to me: the stone character’s end was no cartoon
Have you reviewed New York, New York yet?
Casino is the best movie of all time
Casino gave me a headache. The whole movie looks like it was shot with vaseline on the lens.
Some interesting points, but I think Casino is a fun, fantastic odyssey! I completely disagree with what you say about Sharon Stone though ! I think she’s impeccable in the film. She personifies Ginger. Love Don Rickles also !
O and the use of “House Of The Rising Sun” at the end 😎👌🏽.
I liked this movie but it's no Goodfellas.
Could you please review Michael Mann's Thief?
Interesting review. I saw Goodfellas as a 15 year old, and it instantly became my favorite film. I keenly looked forward to Casino, and I didn't enjoy it. In fact, I was kind of bored. At the time, I didn't have interest in analyzing the experience, but I think the difference for me is that Goodfelllas emotionally engaged me. In my own way, I was able to identify with the strange friendships, loyalties, betrayals, struggles. Whereas Casino left me completely cold. 'Wolf Of Wall Street' falls somewhere in between. I enjoyed it. Won't ever watch it again though.
Appreciate your review and opinion of the film. I happen to think, and probably a lot of people who love the gangster film genre, That Casino is/was one of Scorsece's great films. With Martie, it always feels, his approach was a more down to earth, almost realistic depiction of this lifestyle, in all its brutality and all. As oppose to the operatic feel of say Godfather. Or what Scarface was. Casino was like Martie getting to tell some of the Vegas organized crime history and of course doing it on a nice budget, with incredible costume and cinematography. I see you didn't mention costume, Deniro's wardrobe alone is just like, I don't think they ever dressed him that bold and flashy ever again in any film. And it looked incredible, I mean he was in the character. You barely speak on the character work, that has been done. I mean its not raging bull as you say... where the performances and the black and white and the tone, its a different feel. I mean Casino is kind of like Tarantino, or even Woody Allen, Wes Anderson. These type of directors are heavily stylistic and tend to return to the same genre time and again, and just sort of add layers to the kinds of topics they love, and have a sinergy with their audience. The heartbeat of the film is Ginger of course. And I think too, Pesci was great as the unpredictable hard headed, hit man type of character. So I mean I agree it was like a more expensive Good Fellas sequel, but, because of the performances, the setting, and the costume and cinematography, its stands a lone as a really entertaining movie, that does pull you in some emotional directions. Deniro and Stone's scenes are great. Pesci's Napoleon-like menace is palpable. Fucking Don Rickles is in the movie. I mean also because of the time frame of some of Scorcese's films its like he's also peaking in and telling about different times in American History. Thanks for letting me rant on here. Keep up the great work.
With Casino, I never really got any sense of moral ambiguity, or a cautionary tale or anything, but rather a snapshot of how a universally famous and successful city/establishment in America was once run by criminal overlords. A bit like Washington DC lol
I just rewatched pescis death scene and i remember it being way worse lmao. The editing was magical right there
Casino is Marty's ost movie with a plot built around it.
Unpopular opinion: I like this film better than Goodfellas.
It can't be though, the script is vastly inferior.
@@Muskateering well that's just like, your opinion, man.
@@seijunsejuki 🕺🏽
A couple random ideas for you..a review of The Rivers Edge, and a top 5 Jack Nicholson movies video. Just saying
Gangs of New York, The Irishman....
Hollywood: Needs more cowbell. I mean Marty, we need more gangsta films!!
Marty: Don't worry, got Killers of the Flower Moon comin out wit you guessed it -- Robert DeNiro and Leonardo DeCraprio.
I think Sharon Stone was amazing in this movie, but I understand for some might be too self aware, unnatural.
As a Beatles fan I’d compare Goodfellas with Sgt. Pepper and Casino with Magical Mystery Tour, and I happen to like MMT more.
I actually met a woman who went to school with and was good friends with Ginger's daughter, not the one in the movie though. The real-life Ginger had a daughter before she met the real-life Ace.
I like Casino but its just an overblown version of GoodFellas.
No more shines, Billy
@@AdrianMartinez-jj9ef you've been gone a long time maybe you haven't heard, I don't shine shoes anymore
@@anthonymartensen3164 Hey hey hey hey hey. Drinks....are on....the house.
Casino and Goodfellas are both incredible movies.
Now i'm off to go get the papers get the papers.
At this point the only part of this film I really love is the simple fact that Don Rickles is in it.
This is one reason why I love your channel: you aren't afraid to criticize the masters. There are certain filmmakers that people seem to think are off-limits to criticism, but no filmmaker is perfect.
Casino is classic
Thank you for the full permission to hate Sharon Stone in this.
I have no argument with those who say Goodfellas is the better film, it probably is, but Casino is my favourite. I love the glitzy world, and I find De Niro’s protagonist more relatable than sleazy Liotta. I also think Pesci’s psychopath has more shades here - he’s a great dad who, after sticking ice picks in your balls and squashing your head like a melon, always gets home to make pancakes for his kid! ❤️
Color of Money will always be my favorite Scorcese film. Great review 👍
* Picking objectively mid Scorsese as your favorite just to feel something *
I like Sharon Stone as ginger. I thought she did a great job. It's an interesting thought experiment to consider who else could have possibly played that role. She would have been too young at the time the film was made but Juliet Lewis is somebody that might be interesting as Ginger.
One of my top ten movies of all time alone with Goodfellas. Disagree with you about Sharon Stone's performance has I thought she was brilliant in the role but hey that's opinions for ya.
Revealing that Ace survives is probably the biggest “fuck you” in a Scorsese film. Like it’s enough to have a character die in the opening only to reveal them surviving, but to have Ace explain that he was lucky to survive the explosion because his car had a metal plate under the seat. It just seems like a slap in the face.
lol wut?
Synecdoche, New York made me think about how I conduct myself and life my life. Casino and Goodfellas are both, for me, pure vouyeristic thrill. And despite any cautionary message, part of me still feels that being a gangster would be f*cking cool, I'll deal with the consequences later. That said, I think Scorsese recognises that too. That life does have an appeal to it.
What are your thoughts on Taxi Driver? Personally I think it's Scorsese's best film and maybe De Niro's as well, and it's the exact opposite of everything you had to say about Casino. It has alot more to say and more subtlety, not to mention it's an outsider/existentialist classic. The CBP Channel called it the ultimate doomer movie.
I would have loved to see Jennifer Jason Leigh in this performance or Julian Moore.