Damina is still one of the Christian apologists that is helping us know the truth of the gospel. We need more people like him... I love his teachings and reviewing teachings.
Yes, you're right, he made several assumptions. However, the answer lies in a deeper study of the word beyond a single translation. In Genesis 22:12, 'Now I know' is often interpreted as a test of Abraham's faith, rather than implying that God didn't already know Abraham's heart. In Hebrew, the language of the Bible, the phrase 'Now I know' (ידעתי עתה) is more accurately translated as 'Now I have seen.' This phrase indicates that God has seen Abraham's willingness to obey, thereby deeming him faithful.
All these conclusions about whether Dr Abel Damina is preaching by Spirit or logically does not clarify what he said is wrong. Based on his teaching, he quoted scriptures to support himself and asked a salient question: who asked them to build an altar. The least anyone can do is scripturally challenge his teachings and answer questions like this by the bible. Heb 11vs17 does not answer any questions about altar. If anything, it establishes the fact that Abraham chose to go and raise an altar himself without God instructing him. Let us not use sentiment to deal with things like this. We all have the bible. If you feel he is teaching wrongly, then bring your own scriptural doctrine, then we can have a proper look. Bless you.
Bro wat are you saying? If u are going to go against what is written you'll need to come with another script let scriptures answer scriptures. Cus there's no place for private interpretation of the Bible. God ask Abraham to offer his son? How else was he supposed to offer him? So what is this talk of God not asking for an alter?
My people, the bible is a revelation of one principal personality from genesis to revelation, and that person is Jesus Christ. The old testament reveals Jesus Christ almost more than the new. Abraham, Isaac and the sacrifice foretells about Jesus Christ the lamb sacrificed. Genesis 3:15, still about Christ. Pastor Benny Hinn has an exhaustive exposition on this subject
The Abraham & Isaac part of his teaching has K leg. Heb 11:19 Abraham reasoned that God could even raise the dead, and so in a manner of speaking he did receive Isaac back from death. So to say Abraham knew he wasn't going to offer Isaac will be untrue based off this script.
The commentator should play the full video. This is usually the problem: you cannot cut a full message and make a commentary on it and you say Dr. Damina is making assumptions. That's unfair! That's wrong!!
Those clips I played wasn't out of context, I have listened to the full teaching. The Bible didn't say God didn't ask Noah for those offer sacrifice, yes it looked like it was silent. Dr Damina did a long work on that it won't be fair to just use few scripts to dispute him. Yet some of the statements are still inferred not explicitly stated in scripture
Scriptures and God’s Word can not be interpreted logically, but by Revelation inspired by the Holy Spirit. This man is too logical and he interpreters God’s Word literally. He needs to encounter the Holy Spirit to know God.I am specifically referring to his challenge of building altars before God.
Are you even listening at all? God didn't ask Abraham to build an altar for him, Abraham did it on it's own Accord,if you think damina is wrong then prove it with scripture
If God did not ask Abraham to offer his son then who did? Now there are more than 2 scriptures in the Bible with same account. Why should we take damina's doctrine?
Damina is still one of the Christian apologists that is helping us know the truth of the gospel. We need more people like him... I love his teachings and reviewing teachings.
Yes, you're right, he made several assumptions. However, the answer lies in a deeper study of the word beyond a single translation. In Genesis 22:12, 'Now I know' is often interpreted as a test of Abraham's faith, rather than implying that God didn't already know Abraham's heart. In Hebrew, the language of the Bible, the phrase 'Now I know' (ידעתי עתה) is more accurately translated as 'Now I have seen.' This phrase indicates that God has seen Abraham's willingness to obey, thereby deeming him faithful.
All these conclusions about whether Dr Abel Damina is preaching by Spirit or logically does not clarify what he said is wrong. Based on his teaching, he quoted scriptures to support himself and asked a salient question: who asked them to build an altar. The least anyone can do is scripturally challenge his teachings and answer questions like this by the bible.
Heb 11vs17 does not answer any questions about altar. If anything, it establishes the fact that Abraham chose to go and raise an altar himself without God instructing him.
Let us not use sentiment to deal with things like this. We all have the bible. If you feel he is teaching wrongly, then bring your own scriptural doctrine, then we can have a proper look. Bless you.
His teachings are still on.
Bro wat are you saying? If u are going to go against what is written you'll need to come with another script let scriptures answer scriptures. Cus there's no place for private interpretation of the Bible. God ask Abraham to offer his son? How else was he supposed to offer him? So what is this talk of God not asking for an alter?
Make it more louder
My people, the bible is a revelation of one principal personality from genesis to revelation, and that person is Jesus Christ. The old testament reveals Jesus Christ almost more than the new. Abraham, Isaac and the sacrifice foretells about Jesus Christ the lamb sacrificed. Genesis 3:15, still about Christ. Pastor Benny Hinn has an exhaustive exposition on this subject
The Abraham & Isaac part of his teaching has K leg. Heb 11:19 Abraham reasoned that God could even raise the dead, and so in a manner of speaking he did receive Isaac back from death. So to say Abraham knew he wasn't going to offer Isaac will be untrue based off this script.
The commentator should play the full video. This is usually the problem: you cannot cut a full message and make a commentary on it and you say Dr. Damina is making assumptions. That's unfair! That's wrong!!
Those clips I played wasn't out of context, I have listened to the full teaching.
The Bible didn't say God didn't ask Noah for those offer sacrifice, yes it looked like it was silent.
Dr Damina did a long work on that it won't be fair to just use few scripts to dispute him.
Yet some of the statements are still inferred not explicitly stated in scripture
Scriptures and God’s Word can not be interpreted logically, but by Revelation inspired by the Holy Spirit. This man is too logical and he interpreters God’s Word literally. He needs to encounter the Holy Spirit to know God.I am specifically referring to his challenge of building altars before God.
Honestly His interpretation of Altar is not absolute!
Sorry Madam holy spirit.
Do you have an altar?
@@PortalsMediaNetworkI thought it's not about his interpretation but rather the stand of the Bible on that subject matter
Are you even listening at all? God didn't ask Abraham to build an altar for him, Abraham did it on it's own Accord,if you think damina is wrong then prove it with scripture
Go and read Hebrew 11:17 u will see damina is a liar , it pains me that she this men make such preaching I am not in such church to stop them
I don't understand u o😂,
Heb 11v17 ?
What lie is there to Dr Damina's teaching here?.
😂😂 If anything it even explains wat he said the more.
Read again
If God did not ask Abraham to offer his son then who did? Now there are more than 2 scriptures in the Bible with same account. Why should we take damina's doctrine?