Great! If there is anything specific you want to see speak now :) I plan to create a "log" manifold first but then do a CNC and hydroformed version to show how to approach them all. Hydroformed is a bit tricky with fusion since there isn't a surface unwrap feature but there are external addons(that cost money) that can be used.
I will give it some thought. Since Fusion doesn't have CFD(other than a fluid option in generative design) the visualization part might be a bit tricky. Boost solves all problems ;) Years ago I was playing around with making dual runner intakes similar to how some cars like the 3kgt(FTO) had a short and long runner set actuated by a valve. Not sure if I will dive down that rabbit hole but I will try and present what I can. Thanks!
Thanks Jared! Hopefully in the near future when I clear a few other projects I will start on my honda swap. After this intake series I plan to do a turbo header as well. What are you working on?
@@LearnEverythingAboutDesign I have a built b16a sir 2, built lsd ys1 trans, t04e garret turbo in a 1991 honda crx with a body kit. I want to get the crv trans and go awd.
Sounds like an awesome build Jared! I often wondered how much abuse the old 80s/early 90s AWD civic wagons would take. Not sure it would hold up to a built B16 but never know. I had seen a RWD crx conversion but they put the engine in the back. kept the FWD layout and just moved it all back. Those were great cars and really hard to find clean ones. I see maybe one or two a year.
@@LearnEverythingAboutDesign They can take alot of abuse if done right. My buddies d16 with just a fairly simple build is reliable pushing 450 to 500 whp. My b16a sir2 is a jdm version and ive been abusing it at 300 wheel for 6 years or so. Until I turned up the boost and blew head gasket. I just decided to go all out and build it right. It just depends on the power levels you want and the reliability you want out of that power level. Tons of info online about it. I also think going k is a good idea rn, as b series blocks and heads are exceptionally more expensive than what they used to be. Get a good tune and overdo it for your application and you will have tons of fun with it.
I have watched tons of K series stuff and read all I can. I had some good friends in the Honda world. One was an 01 Integra TypeR with a turbo pushing about 350. It was a great car even without the turbo. The AWD civic I was talking about was the late 80s Shuttle. I thought it shared the floor or part of it with the CRX so wasn't sure how easy that AWD system was to work with and how much power it could hold vs using CRV parts.
those sketches are in the download in the description of the video. The first sketch shown was on a top down plane, the second sketch was on a different construction plane and the 65mm line was projected into that sketch. If you can give me a bit more info on what part isn't working ill try to help.
Its ok, my video style isn't for everyone. I get a lot of comments from people who like the extra info. I treat it more like a live class. If you don't like this video chances are that you won't like any of the other content.
You said something we should keep in mind like 50 times
This is oddly and perfectly useful for my applications! Thanks!
Great! If there is anything specific you want to see speak now :) I plan to create a "log" manifold first but then do a CNC and hydroformed version to show how to approach them all. Hydroformed is a bit tricky with fusion since there isn't a surface unwrap feature but there are external addons(that cost money) that can be used.
@@LearnEverythingAboutDesign Love the idea! Nothing specific, perhaps how different designs and their effect on airflow?
I will give it some thought. Since Fusion doesn't have CFD(other than a fluid option in generative design) the visualization part might be a bit tricky. Boost solves all problems ;) Years ago I was playing around with making dual runner intakes similar to how some cars like the 3kgt(FTO) had a short and long runner set actuated by a valve. Not sure if I will dive down that rabbit hole but I will try and present what I can.
Thanks!
I am loving you channel more and more. Fusion 360 and honda motors.
Thanks Jared! Hopefully in the near future when I clear a few other projects I will start on my honda swap. After this intake series I plan to do a turbo header as well. What are you working on?
@@LearnEverythingAboutDesign I have a built b16a sir 2, built lsd ys1 trans, t04e garret turbo in a 1991 honda crx with a body kit. I want to get the crv trans and go awd.
Sounds like an awesome build Jared! I often wondered how much abuse the old 80s/early 90s AWD civic wagons would take. Not sure it would hold up to a built B16 but never know. I had seen a RWD crx conversion but they put the engine in the back. kept the FWD layout and just moved it all back. Those were great cars and really hard to find clean ones. I see maybe one or two a year.
@@LearnEverythingAboutDesign They can take alot of abuse if done right. My buddies d16 with just a fairly simple build is reliable pushing 450 to 500 whp. My b16a sir2 is a jdm version and ive been abusing it at 300 wheel for 6 years or so. Until I turned up the boost and blew head gasket. I just decided to go all out and build it right. It just depends on the power levels you want and the reliability you want out of that power level. Tons of info online about it. I also think going k is a good idea rn, as b series blocks and heads are exceptionally more expensive than what they used to be. Get a good tune and overdo it for your application and you will have tons of fun with it.
I have watched tons of K series stuff and read all I can. I had some good friends in the Honda world. One was an 01 Integra TypeR with a turbo pushing about 350. It was a great car even without the turbo.
The AWD civic I was talking about was the late 80s Shuttle. I thought it shared the floor or part of it with the CRX so wasn't sure how easy that AWD system was to work with and how much power it could hold vs using CRV parts.
Just finished following this video! Can't wait to complete the next few parts.
Thanks Rhein. I have been away the past few days but hope to wrap up this series this week with the multi axis version
@@LearnEverythingAboutDesign Sweet! I just finished up Part 2, hopping onto Part 3. Great stuff man
Lost me at 7:50. Really wanted to follow this but can't seem to replicate the ability to draw on an offset line like you are.
those sketches are in the download in the description of the video. The first sketch shown was on a top down plane, the second sketch was on a different construction plane and the 65mm line was projected into that sketch. If you can give me a bit more info on what part isn't working ill try to help.
Hard to watch just rambled for no reason
Its ok, my video style isn't for everyone. I get a lot of comments from people who like the extra info. I treat it more like a live class.
If you don't like this video chances are that you won't like any of the other content.