The 6 Days of Creation (Full Video)
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 07. 2024
- Answers in Genesis - USA with Ken Ham.
Why so many Christian leaders reject the clear teaching of Genesis 1 about ordinary days?
The church's general compromise with evolution's long ages is undermining the biblical worldview!
![SIX DAYS & THE AUTHORITY OF SCRIPTURE | Ken Ham [Answers In Genesis]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7BxTyJ3p0pM/mqdefault.jpg)
![SIX DAYS & THE AUTHORITY OF SCRIPTURE | Ken Ham [Answers In Genesis]](/img/tr.png)
The Bible says 6 literal days if you go into the scriptures in Genesis God was light he separated his light before the darkness that was before the sun and moon were created but every single time it says first day second day and Third Day right before that it says and it was evening and morning indicating that it was a day
literal day
Privileged to have known about him for so long, since I was 16!
I met him once :-)
What Is Your Worldview? - Creation or Evolutionism? Story please?
Known about him since probably 3rd grade.
Bible says earth is flat
Helios is the sun God..hence heliocentric solar system. Sun created 4th day
..what did earth "float around???
He placed them in sky .. He did say it
If met him I would burn my clothes afterwards. Disgusting, evil, creep of a man!
2 Corinthians 6:14Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?
This is why education is so important. Critical thinking is a vital life skill that many seems to lack.
Doesn't that depend on what is being taught?
@23452345q34
Evolutionary Theory is a 100% provable fact do you want to call me out on that? You are not dealing with some Creationist apologist echo chamber here I can provide actual factual practical science to prove that you are talking absolute drivel!
Whilst you were doing that give me all this meaningful, tangible and empirical evidence you have of your god
@23452345q34
As I thought.... running scared!
@23452345q34
Well unless I've missed something the consensus of modern science is happy that we as humans evolved from apes & more basal life forms prior to that. We certainly see no evidence for the biblical account whatsoever!
Your new post showed up in my digest but has not made it onto the upload, a common problem with YT at the moment. Could you please repost?
The origin of the word yom or day in Genesis came about from the word heat meaning a day from the light. This is how I teach it!!!
Excellent presentation!
Just as Proverbs 30:6 says not too add,
Deuteronomy 4:2 & 12:32 says do not add or take away.
Deut 13 says a false prophet is determined by if they add and take away, if they try to get you to walk in ways different than what God instructed believers through Moses.
Just a reminder that Ken Ham is worth $55mm and his wealth relies 100% on YEC
I wouldn't know who Ken Ham is or what he says had it not been for rude and angry atheists, so the mockers do serve a purpose. Now if only they cared enough about the truth to learn the difference between real science and scientism.
Well put sir, well put praise Jesus
"Let there be light!"i believe thats the moment Yah created photons!
I was thinking about teaching creation today at church and doubting whether I should teach it. I was thinking that I should be teaching about Jesus. Earlier I had read the curriculum and felt at peace about teaching it this teaching confirms I need to teach it.
Your Ignorance is so sad. Even sadder is that you are trying to teach your Ignorance to those poor innocent little children. That is disgusting.
Child abuse.
Very good teaching! Thanks from Brazil.
I'd try & get out of that Brazilian sun a bit if I was you you, it's messing with what mind you may have!
Some fools believe that is in the universe emerged by itself but don’t believe in God. I call them religious more than Christians, coz they believe in miracles more than we do.
Proof?
@@pup1008 good luck with that.
So funny. I love it! I'm an Aussy, too.
Love the song
God bless this man!
This episode is pure gold...
The episode is a montage of Ken Ham’s lack of scientific knowledge
@@Charlie94781 Everything came from nothing is your scientific solution?
@@MB-uw4xrCan't be any worse than grown adults believing in biblical fairy tales.
@@PortmanRd I'm sorry if you've been hurt in the past from someone 'representing' a Christian
Somethings you just throw in that mental box, lock it, throw away the key, and forget.
I believe Gods Word is Living and will never fade away like it says in the Bible Heaven and Earth will fade away but Gods Word will remain
Call me a fool or threaten to kill me for Talking or Believing in My God I will stand for God and I will Die for Him too cause He did the same for me and I Love Him because He loved me first! His Word is the Truth and the Truth will set you Free from all your sins and doubt!
No one is threatening to kill you. I'm not calling you a fool.
These things are however, mentioned in the Bible about non-believers.
14:45 Amen 🙏🏻
Yeshua is the light of the world and he has been here since before the Fathers works of old. There is your answer. I love your teaching. Shalom. הללויה. John 8:12/Proverbs 8:22
Woe unto those who add or take away from Gods word
Day 1. light …………………………...... (sets)
Day 2. expansion ……………… (in order)
Day 3. dry land ……………...... (creation)
Day 4. lights……………….....(Firmanent)
Day 5. fish and birds ... (comes alive)
Day 6. animals & humans... (to creation)
Day 7. rest......… (creation is finished and it is good)
Day 8. *It's all disproven nonsense!*
I have a question I'm NOT trying to compel you or anything it's of my soundmind overview. Do you really think or believe that we just randomly came from nothing rather than something? "theoretically" for example Richard Dawkins like how did he come up with a theory supposedly knowing who the "Fiirst Human" was , like who told him ya know? like how on earth are we suppose to believe that's true? and to me that sounds genetically impossible for us to evolve from an "ancestral creature"(apes/monkeys) it's like "we have to see to believe " right? "if wE CaMe fRoM aPes/MoNkeys Then whY arE THErE Still ApEs/ MoNkEys? For that reason It just doesn't add up from my own soundmind overview. I'm saying for example inoder to get a human being you need both human DNA male and female to genetically reproduce a human offspring you know what I'm trying to say not that I'm trying prove any thing here just being of soundmind about this DNA is just so complex that is extraterrestrial genetically transcripted orderly somewhat and somehow came (by/ from) someone or something' sound mindly of my overview that's like knowing "a Book with no author"? and "Doesn't writing require a writer".?
I encourage you to read The KJV bible, Find and understand The life, The Meaning, The Purpose in God for you and every one around us God bless you future (brother/sister) in christ smile cause he (God) loves you and your family and neighbors 🙏
@@betocastro8910
I'm really trying to help you here & please don't take this the wrong way but you are *SO* far out with your understanding & education in all this that I don't know where to start!
It would probably take me 20 posts to unpick the nonsense you've been indoctrinated with & to get you to what science categorically knows & can give indisputable facts for.
If you honestly what to know, go to talkorigins.org they give a comprehensive breakdown of all this as well as showing where Creationist claims are wrong. Unlike religion, they are not pulling this stuff from their backsides - all they affirm can be backed up with indisputable evidence.
Just to help you a bit with Evolution, we will use the example of Latin turning into Spanish, Italian, Portuguese & French. A woman who spoke Latin didn't suddenly give birth to a child that spoke Portuguese. These languages developed over long periods of time in different areas. That is analogous of how species develop & change.
@@pup1008 I'm sorry I'm not lying but this is what the first book of the bible really tells me/us: Introduction to Genesis
Sketch:
1. The beginning of human history (1: 1-11: 26)
A. Origin of the universe and life (1: 1- 2:25)
1. Compendium of all creation (1: 1-2: 4)
2. Expanded account of the creation of Adam and Eve (2: 5-25)
B. Origin of sin (3: 1-24)
1. The temptation and the fall (3: 1-6)
2. Consequences of the fall (3: 7-24)
C. Origins of civilization (4: 1-5: 32)
1. Cain: pagan culture (4: 1-24)
2. Seth: a righteous remnant (4: 25-26)
3. The genealogical history of the antediluvian patriarchs (5: 1-32)
D. The universal flood: God's judgment on primitive civilization (6: 1-8: 19)
1. Universal depravity (6: 1-8,11-12)
2. Noah: preparation to save a righteous remnant (6: 9-22)
3. Final instructions and the flood (7: 1-8: 19)
E. New beginning of humanity (8: 20-11: 26)
1. Noah's posterity (8: 20-10: 32; 11:10 -26)
2. The tower of Babel (11: 1-9)
3. Genealogical links between shem and abraham (11: 10-26)
2. The origins of the Hebrew people (11: 27-50: 26)
A. Abraham (11: 27-25: 18)
1. Abram's family background (11: 27-32)
2. Abram's calling and journey of faith (12: 1-14: 24)
3. God's formal covenant with Abram (15: 1-21)
4. Hagar and Ishmael (16: 1-16)
5. Abrahamic covenant sealed with a new man and circumcision (17: 1-27)
6. The promise of Abraham and the tragedy of Lot (18: 1-19: 38)
7. Abraham and Amibelech (20: 1-18)
8. Abraham and Isaac, the son of promise (21: 1-24: 67)
9. Abraham's posterity (25: 1-18)
B. Isaac (25: 19-28: 9)
1. Birth of Esau and Jacob (25: 19-26)
2. Esau sells his birthright to Jacob (25: 27-34)
3. Isaac, Rebekah, and Abimelech (26: 1-17)
4. Dispute about the wells and the transfer to beersheba (26: 18-33)
5. the patriarchal blessing (26: 34-28: 9)
C. Jacob (28: 10-36: 43)
1. Jacob's dream and journey (28: 10-22)
2. Jacob with Laban in Haran (29: 1-31: 55)
3. Reconciliation of Jacob and Esau (32: 1-33: 17)
4. Jacob's return to the promised land (33: 18- 35: 20)
D. Joseph (37: 2b-50: 26)
1. Joseph and his brothers in Canaan (37: 2-36)
2. Judah and Tamar (38: 1-30)
3 trials and promotion of Joseph in Egypt (42: 1-45: 28)
4. Joseph and his brothers in Egypt (42: 1-45: 28)
5. Joseph's father and brothers settle in Egypt (46: 16- 47: 26)
6. last days, later prophecies and death of jacob (47: 27-50: 14)
Introduction: Genesis
Author: Moses
Topic: the beginnings
Date: ca. 1445 - 1405 BC
background: Genesis appropriately appears as the first book of the Old Testament and serves as an essential introduction to the entire Bible. The Hebrew title is derived from the first word in the book, bereshit ("at the beginning"). "Genesis", the title in the Spanish Bible, Greek translation of the Hebrew title and means: "the origin, the source, the creation or is the beginning of something". Genesis is "the book of origins".
The author of Genesis is not designated in the book. The testimony of the rest of the Bible, however, is that Moses was the author of the entire Pentateuch (ie, the first five OT books) and, consequently, of Genesis (eg, 1R 2: 3; 2R 14: 6; Ezra 6:18; Neh 13: 1; Dan 9:11; Neh 13: 1; Dan 9: 11-13; Mal 4: 4; Mr 12:26; Lk 16: 29,31; Jn 7: 19-23 Acts 26:22; 1 Cor 9: 9; 2 Cor 3:15). Also, ancient Jewish writers and early church fathers unanimously testify that Moses was the author / editor of Genesis. therefore all the history of Genesis precedes the life of Moses, his role in writing Genesis was mainly to integrate, by inspiration of the Holy Spirit, all the chronicles and writings, from Adam to the death of Joseph, which are now preserved in Genesis. Perhaps an indication of the historical chronicles that Moses used in writing Genesis is found in the eleven occurences of the phrase "these are the generations of" (Heb. 'Eleh toledot), which can also be translated "these are the stories by" ( see 2: 4; 5: 1; 6: 9; 10: 1; 11: 10,27; 25: 12,19; 36: 1,9; 37: 2). Genesis accurately records the creation, the beginning of human history, the origin of the Hebrew people, and God's covenant with them through Abraham and the other patriarchs. Their historical veracity as inspired Scriptures is certified in the NT by the Lord Jesus (Mt 19: 4-6; 24: 37-39; Le 11:51; 17: 26-32; Jn 7: 21-23; 8: 56 - 58) and the apostles (Ro 4; 1Co 15: 21-22,45-47; 2Co 11: 3; Gal 3: 8; 4: 22-24,28; 1Ti 2: 13-14; Heb 11 : 4-22; 2P 3: 4-6; Judg 7,11). Modern archaeological discoveries confirm its historicity. Moses was extraordinarily prepared by his education (Acts 7:22) and by God to write this unique book of the Bible.
Purpose: Genesis provides an essential foundation for the rest of the Pentateuch and all the biblical revelations that follow. It preserves the only trustworthy story about the origin of the universe, humanity, marriage, sin, cities, languages, nations, Israel, and the history of redemption. It was written according to God's purpose to give his people covenant in the OT and NT a fundamental understanding of himself, creation, the human race, the fall, death, judgment, the covenant, and the promise of redemption by the middle of the seed of Abraham.
Overview: Genesis is naturally divided into two main parts. (A) Chaps 1-11 provide an overview of the origin of famine from Adam to Abraham and focus on five epochal events. (1) Creation: God created all things, and Adam and Eve whom he placed in the Garden of Eden (chs 1-2). (2) the fall: Adam and Eve by their transgression introduced the curse of sin and death into human history (ch. 3) (3) Cain and Abel: This tragedy set in motion the two fundamental currents of history: civilization humanist and redemptive remnant (chs 4-5). (4) The universal flood: The ancient world had become so bad in the time of Noah's generation that God destroyed it with a universal flood, saving only righteous Noah and his family as a remnant (chs. 6-10). (5) The Tower of Babel: When the post-Flood world unified in idolatry and rebellion. God dispersed it by fragmenting language and culture, and scattering the human race throughout the earth (ch. 11). (B) Chs. 12-50 record the origin of the Hebrew people and focus on the progressive redemptive plan of God through the lives of the four great patriarchs of Israel: Abraham, Isaac, Jacob. God's call to Abraham (ch. 12) and his covenant relationships with him and his seed form the decisive beginning of the realization of God's purpose regarding the Redeemer and redemption in history. Genesis concludes with the death of Joseph and the impending enslavement of Israel in Egypt.
special features:
Seven main aspects or emphases characterize this book: (1) It was the first written book of the Bible (with the possible exception of Job) and records the beginning of human history, sin, the Hebrew people, and redemption. (2) The Genesis history encompasses a longer period of time than the rest of the Bible. It begins with the first human couple, spreading into pre-Flood world history, and then concentrating on Hebrew history as the redemptive stream that runs through the rest of the OT. (3) Genesis reveals that the material universe and life on earth are clearly the work of God and not a process independent of nature. Fifty times in chs. 1-2 God is the subject of verbs that show what He did as Creator. (4) Genesis is the book of the first events: it records the first marriage, the first family, the first birth, the first sin, the first murder, the first polygamist, the musical instruments, the first promise of redemption, and so on. . (5) God's covenant with Abraham, which began with his calling (12: 1-3), was formalized in ch. 15 and ratified in ch. 17, is of central importance throughout the Scriptures. (6) Only Genesis explains the origin of the twelve tribes of Israel. (7) It reveals how the descendants of Abraham ended up in Egypt (430 years), thus setting the scene for the exodus, which is the central OT redemptive event.
Fulfillment in the New Testament:
Genesis reveals the prophetic story of redemption and a Redeemer who comes through the seed of the woman (3:15), from the line of Seth (4: 25-26), from the line of Shem (9: 26-27) and of the seed of Abraham (12: 3). The NT applies 12: 3 directly to God's provision of redemption in Jesus Christ (Gal 3: 16,29). Many people and events in Genesis are mentioned in the NT in relation to faith and justice (eg, Ro 4; Heb 11: 1-22), God's judgment (eg, Le 17: 26-29,32; 2P 3:63 Jude 7,11a), and the person of Christ (eg, Mt 1: 1; Jn 8:58; Heb 7).
@@betocastro8910
We've looked at the bible for 2000 years now & can categorically say it is nonsense. There is no objective merit or worth in any scientific claims it makes.
You people are only a few hundred years on from jailing *Galileo* for correctly stating the Earth orbits the Sun rather than the biblical account so with all due respect - shut up with what the bible says or your revised MK284 adapted version of it!
If you still feel the need to get nebulous information from religious books can I suggest you become a Hindu as they actually got the time line & events of the Big Bang spot on & are not now scrambling about trying retro fit what was written in their accounts into what science has now shown us to be the truth.
Just as a heads up - I will not read any posts over 20 lines. If you what to put down the key tenets of that rambling tome above into that I will have a look but won't be reading through lines of crap which vast passed experience has shown me won't add up to a hill of credible beans!
I like what God says about you unbelievers...Romans 1:20For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
I am Catholic and I still believe in e evolution.
Do you think all evolutionists are against Christiany
Because they aren't
But you are ingorant
I don't like Yahweh. He is schizophrenic, cruel and stupid. I am so glad he existed only as a fictional character in an ancient Hebrew book.
I'm not an unbeliever. I love Zeus.
How can you deny the mountains of evidence for evolution, but think that a dirt-man and a rib-woman populated the Earth through incest? And you deny evolution over hundreds of millions of years, but conveniently believe that a microevolution happened after the Flood in 4000 years?!?!
Use logic, my friend! Trust your brain!
Ham insists we don't come from monkeys. He certainly knows how to make monkeys out of his followers.
So, did God speak to just one person to create the bible or did he speak to many people to create it? Was it all at the same time or was it over a period of time? If more than one person, when did they all get together to write the bible? What is the language that God used to tell people His story or was it through their minds? What if some of the stuff was lost in translation?
It never actually happened but it's a good question though!
Ken said he didn't know what the first day light creation was . I think I might know, John 8:12-20 12When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life. also , Col. 1:15-17 states ‘He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. 16 For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. 17 And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist.’ These verses show Jesus as the creator of the invisible, such as angels, as well as the visible creation. Jesus is the only physical representation of God we will ever see. Yet He is all we need to see since He is the visible image of the fullness of the Godhead (Colossians 2:9 “For in Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead in bodily form.”). Jesus is the light in DAY ONE!
xXUr MommaXX: Many won't admit what you have correctly stated because the implication of that and Col 1:15 is that Yahshua (Jesus) is a created being... It doesn't fit with their belief that Yahshua IS Yahweh (God) when Scripture clearly teaches that Yahweh is greater than His Son. I agree that Yahshua is and was the Light created on yom echad.
Yawn...
Good luck with that.
Praise God!!
I don't praise someone out of a fairy tail
So what is your explanation for the universe?
@@OkieAllDay big bang
So you believe that nothingness created everything? That takes more faith than belief that a Creator God created the universe
@@OkieAllDay the difference is that for the big bang there is proof, you can't say the same about god.
Day 1: "earth,, space, time & light" Day 4: "sun, moon & stars" ? Clearly that indicates an alternate light source for the first 3 days. Somebody help me out here, where did that "light come from?
Yes Noah's Flood is referenced in Genesis, but on the YEC timeline, where does Theia impact occur (evidenced recently through lunar rocks and chunks near Earth's core). Add in vulcanism. Add in Vredefort impact and Chicxulub impact that were clearly far more devastating than the Flood, but not mentioned in any ancient writings. When does the recently discovered Deniliquin crater appear? I've asked so many questions here, but no answers yet.
I remember well a conversation with an AOG man about 1985 who said to me "I'm a scientist. I teach science at the Ham Road High School in Brisbane (Not named after Ken Ham but he would know the school). Do you expect me to get up in front of my colleagues and proclaim a 6 day creation 6000 years ago?" I said yes. He turned and walked off.
So there you have it, wanting to look good before men is the reason for Christians proclaiming billions of years and denying Christ. Ken believes you can be a Christian and reject a 6 day creation, but I wonder when it crosses the line and qualifies as a denial of Christ.
I sometimes wonder what God considers his greatest work - Creation or redemption. If we were talking about say a Ford Mustang - is the greatest work in designing and building the car or in doing a rebuild some 50+ years later. I'm not sure but I reckon God would be jealous of his role as creator and would not be happy with a belittling of that work. Romans 1:18-32 He Paul writes that God expects that men will seek Him because creation demonstrates a creator. Billions of years denies a creator and therefore men would have an excuse for not believing.
Definitely redemption.
"But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies will be burned up and dissolved, and the earth and the works that are done on it will be exposed.
Since all these things are thus to be dissolved, what sort of people ought you to be in lives of holiness and godliness, waiting for and hastening the coming of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be set on fire and dissolved, and the heavenly bodies will melt as they burn! But according to his promise we are waiting for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells."
- 2 Peter 3; 10 - 13 (ESV)
The Earth and heavens are of little significance compared to redemption. The Earth and heavens will be burned up and thrown away. Redemption is the eternal, unexpected act of loving-kindness for all to witness forever.
Well there's that & the small fact that secular science has literal mountains of evidence to back up all it asserts. You have a discredited & disprove old book!
Maybe reassess your epistemology & rather than thinking the people who are right are wrong try figuring you've been sold the biggest "pup" known to man!
@@pup1008 - You speak vague, meaningless nothingness. What science? Materials science? Oceanography? Entomology? Maybe the Queen of the Sciences?
Ooooh! Secular Science. Does that science study secularism?
"... mountains of evidence ..."? Evidence of what, exactly. Meaningless words. Are you trying to refute the Word of God that I quoted? You come to the table with literally nothing. Stop wasting my time.
@@rubiks6
Do you & would you stand by the word of god against all challenges?
Do you stand by the word of the bible that the Earth is 6500 years old & everything alive today descended from the creatures that Noah saved on the Ark 4500 years ago?
What would it take to destroy that faith?
@@rubiks6
*? ? ?*
Because of the 7th Day Sabbath
WOW! I can't believe that in this day and age there are still some people who think that this crazy myth and even crazier Bible storybook is actually true. It is so sad to see how Ignorant some people are, believing in this nonsense.
Speak for yourself or *America!* This crap would last *2 mins* in the *UK* & most of civilised Western Europe!
@@pup1008 The UK has a much larger number of people who do not believe in the myths.
@@mochatech121
That's what I said?
@@pup1008 Yes
because if you believe that the creation is a myth
you will believe heaven and hell are myths too.
A plain reading of the text says 6 days plus 1 day of rest, holding to any other interpretation is a violation of the 4th commandment (Exodus 20:8-11).
God’s law is written down VERY PLAINLY (Deuteronomy 27:8), and cursed be he that confirmeth not the words of the law and do them (Deuteronomy 27:26).
The saints are those who keep God’s law and the faith of Jesus (2 Peter 2:20-22; Revelation 12:17; Revelation 14:12-13).
If we won’t believe God when He tells us of earthly things, such as the six day creation, then how can we believe Him when He speaks of the heavenly things? (John 3:12).
The Bible and Science Agree: The Earth is Young Paperback - June 20, 2012
by Roger D. Melquist (Author)
Duh babel be BULLSHIT. FUCK your made up god.
No they don't.
Science doesn't state it's a young earth.
All you unbelivers when you die and stand befor God the one who created all what are you going to say then
Why did you support slavery, homophobia, stoning errant children to death & genocide?
We could them get into childhood cancers, why he was a few billion years out with the age of the Earth & not even in the same country as the target for his given description of the ascent of life on the planet!
Thanks for the beer volcanoes.
R'amen
25:02-25:46 very sad
Certainly ones believes God created everything, this would include Lucifer. Where in the record of the 6 days of creation of this present world is the creation of Lucifer, the cherub that covereth ? (Eze 28:14)
Eze 28:15 says iniquity was found in Lucifer; however Rom 5:16 says sin entered because of Adam. So who was it that brought sin into this world, Lucifer or Adam?
The truth is the six days of creation of this present world began at Gen 1:3.
Crazy talk.
Dan Miller in what way?
Most of the Earliest of Jewish and Christian commentaries gave other interpretations than twenty four literal days' Any one please show a quote from one of the early Church fathers or Jewish Source's that claim the Genesis Ch 1 was expressing twenty four hour literal days. were meant to be the time period for the creation of the things mentioned in Genesis Chapter one. The age day was taught by Philo Origen Agustine. Philo 40 BC 30AD was influenced and quoted and used by the Early Church fathers as Orthodox. Not that it is right or wrong but it shows that Translators and the earliest commentators and teachers believed God created the Universe and earth out side of time in the Infinite past. It is not a new question concerning days . It was the most accepted view that the days in Chapter 1 of Genesis was not giving a literal creation of all things in six twenty four hour days.
"Elohim looked at the light and saw that it was beautiful. Elohim divided the light into a unit of twelve hours and the darkness into a unit of twelve hours.
Elohim named the newly-formed unit of twelve hours of light “day”..."
From Rashbam's Genesis
Rashbam was an authoratative Ribbinical writer (1085-1158AD)
Jesus liebt dich!
Smoking first, then read the bible you will be okay my children.
Day one God created light, not the sun... Jesus is the light... Just what I feel the Holy Spirit put in me...
I am curious, why would God create light in the first place if he was going to create the Sun? What purpose would the Sun serve? And if all light comes from the Sun, where is the "light" that God talks about?
Jesus is not a created being,thats not the holy spirit talking to you, john1:1,inthe begining was the word,&the word was with God,& the word was God,& the word became flesh & dwelt among us jesus is God without begining& without end
Brother, Jesus is not God's creation, He is the Creator.
You want to believe the creation was done in six literal days without literally believing God made the seventh day Sabbath HOLY? How dies that make any sense? Then you quote Prov 30:5-6... why do you lie about the Sabbath being replaced by sunday when there is ZERO biblical support? Better pay close attention to Proverbs 30:6, it is condemning you.
20:20 It doesn't say day and night It says *evening and *morning day one. You can't have an* evening and* morning without the sun. See you don't even know what it says.
Genesis 1:3.And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. 4. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. 5.And God called the *light Day, and the darkness he called* Night. And the **evening and the **morning were the first day. So how long was the night or the day with no sun ??
creation.com/evenings-and-mornings
Good and very concise article on that. The markers of evening and day may have been simply used as time stamps since probably neither Moses nor any hebrew at the time new any better way of keeping time than just analyzing the sun's position relative to the horizon. Another possibility is that there was a temporary light source, which might have been God himself. This idea is suggested by other books throughout the Bible that depict God as a strong light source.
truethinker it was Spiritual day and night read John 1 :1-18
Here in 5 Day and night God creating time
Moses and Jesus fasted 40 Days
Not 40 million yrs
The Jews honored the 7th day not the 7th millionth day
I highly recommend the Ark Encounter.
Got the opportunity to go there last week.
Much better than I had hoped for. Good food too.
Chicken Taco, I have no clue what you are trying to communicate. Speak English.
Poco Loco, ok, at least you have made a complete semi-legible statement.
1. “Intelligent “ people should not be quick to stereotype people they have never met.
2. I do enjoy those two old caustic, sarcastic old dude muppets up the balcony, I must admit.
3. Yes, I read books other than the Bible. Constantly.
What do you recommend?
If I may reverse this question, have you studied what you criticize? Why does Christianity bother you enough that you spend time posting comments on a Creationist CZcams video?
Taco Loco,
Wikipedia currently claims 69% of Americans identify as Christian.
24% agnostic/atheistic/humanist
Mainstream Christianity does not equal cult, nor does atheism.
Spending time with CZcams Creationists videos and posting insults rather than logic based objections seems to display you may be a little closer to the cultist personality type you claim to despise. Perhaps you have not noticed?
Fish Taco:
"69% is a lot. This is the most religious of all western countrys"
LC: Yep.
America does have a strong religious foundation as evidenced by the Declaration
of Independence:
"We hold
these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are
endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Or, pull out any
U.S. currency. "In God we trust."
You can call
Christianity a cult, it is not. You insult rather than attempt to
persuade. It is easier.
Loco: "If
your church gets billions tax free, you use Christianity in politics, schools,
in labs e.t.c. You get special treats then you are a cult."LC:
Perhaps you think
Duke Energy, General Electric, and General Motors are cults as well using your "logic"? 2.2 billion in tax breaks since 2000 A.D.
You mentioned abortion.
Are you aware
"Planned Parenthood, which is by far the nation’s largest and wealthiest
abortion provider ... is the largest single recipient of Title X funds, to
the tune of about $80 million per year." (W. Krumholz, May 21, 2018)
Loco:
"Easier to get in to politics if you are religious. Not only in the U.S.
but worldwide.
"LC:
Normal people want people with morals in office.
Loco: "That
was even dumber than your first comment."
LC: Spoken
by a man bursting with wisdom. As far as
your barrage of well thought out questions...I cannot force myself to answer a question you do not really want answers to.
You are created in
the image of God, although you cannot see it.
There is a path
to God, although you will not follow it.
If you did not
actually believe that there was hope, I doubt you would even be here on a Christian You Tube video squawking.
Will correct one statement of yours:
Piccolo: “You think you have better morals.”
LC: Nope. The Creator sets those.
I know I am a sinner. I know I do not meet God’s standard for salvation. Perfection.
“I (Jesus) said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.” John 8:24
Pollo Loco, in spite of your insults you may be here for a reason.
To one of the thieves crucified next to Him, Jesus said: “This day you shall be with me in paradise.”
To the other, He said nothing.
It's really a good question, as God created universe and earth in 6 days and it was also mentioned in Quran that earth was created in 2 days (day as per space time Allah knows well)
Universe and earth=6
Earth=2
Difference between universe and earth 6/2=3 days
As per science it was proved that universe was 13.5 billion years old (6 days) and earth was 4.5 billion years old (2 days)
So, earth is 3 times younger than universe😊
Our creator can give hints of his existence as u wants to either with scriptures or science or his sign in nature or everyone feels of his existence(super natural power)!! We should strengthen our faith exploring him and obeying his commandments unseen and unheard that's the test of life na!! He created everything in pair hell and heaven too:)
Creation
Quran 2:29 earth was created first, then heaven
Quran 79:27-30 heaven was created first then earth
quran 7:54 - took 6 days to create universe
Quran 41:9-12 - took 8 days to create universe
Which is which?
In the Hadith the earth is created in 7 days not including the heavens.
Riyad as-Salihin 1854
(Sunnah.com)
Also in Sahih Muslim 2789
Abu Hurairah (May Allah be pleased with him) said:
The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) took hold of my hand and said, "Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, created the earth on Saturday, the mountains on Sunday, the trees on Monday, the things entailing labour on Tuesday, light on Wednesday, He spread out animals of all kinds on Thursday, and created Adam in the afternoon on Friday, and it was the last hour of Friday between the afternoon and the night."
Muhammad copied the info from the bible and still got it messed up. You would have to be stupid to think the world was made in 6 days. We are living on a rock that was once a burning ball of fire.
The six days in genesis explains the order of life, but also a separation as the world became chaos. Adam was not the first man, nor made of clay, but like all life form, we all come from the womb of the earth, and return to the earth. Adam was the first man made in the image of God after light and dark were seperated, but unlike Jesus who is the second Adam, Adam fell into the same darkness of man. From him a new seed is used to bring forth a branch that will eventually bring us the light of the Father.
Allah’s creation witnessed by unbelievers:
A. Surah 21:30: Do the disbelievers not see that the heavens and the earth were joined together as one, before We tore them apart? We made every living thing from water. Then, will they not believe? (S. V. Ahamed)
Almaany Dictionary: يَرَ = see
1. Can you comprehend the utter foolishness of the question raised by Allah in this Qur’anic verse? Allah is asking: “Do the disbelievers not see that the heavens and the earth were joined together as one, before We tore them apart?” How can they see when they are not there?
2. Is it possible for the disbelievers to witness this phenomenon?
3. Were they there to witness Allah creation of the heavens and earth?
4. Since mankind was not created before the creations of the physical heavens and the earth, it is possible for the disbelievers to witness this phenomenon? As such, how could Allah then ask, “Will they not then believe?”
5. Allah tore the Heavens and the Earth apart, did earth where out of heaven (space)? Isn’t the earth part of the heaven (space)?
6. If the earth is not in space then where is it?
7. Even atheist scientists disagree that heavens and earth are first together and then set apart, so how can you say this verse is agreement with the atheist scientist? Are the atheist scientist alone disbelievers? There are many others who are disbelievers.
8. And what about the disbelievers in Muhammad’s time?
9. We made every living thing from water. Who are the “WE”? You mean Allah is more than one? Sometime he used the word “I”.
10. Every living thing made from water? Are you sure? Jinn were made from fire.
This Qur’anic verse is providing you with a solid reason not to believe in Allah.
B. Surah 41:11: Then, He rose over the high heavens when it was smoke: And He said to it and to the earth: “You both come together, willingly or unwillingly.” They both said: “We do come together in willing obedience.” (Syed Vickar Ahamed)
The above Qur’anic verse clearly states that in the process of creation, the heavens and the earth initially existed separately until Allah called them to “come together.”
So, were the heavens and the earth existing together as one before they were separated by Allah (Surah 21:30) or were they originally existing separately until Allah called them to come together (Surah 41:11)?
Made every living thing from water? Surah 21:30
Surah 21:30 …And We made from water every living thing…
Surah 55:15 And created the jinn from a fusion of fire.
Jinn is also a living thing.
@@ravinderchahal2391 who's the "we" created, and why did they claim also to create the jin?
GOD is one and never uses we or us when speaking of himself, always I or me, and certainly never created darkness or evil himself for us to suffer in it.
I no longer believe in gap theory and now i believe that creation days are literal. Praise God!
He was always crazy.
Does he actually believe what he's saying?
What do you believe?
i think that those six days of creation in genesis mean only six distinctive periods. why did it take six days from almighty god who could have done everything in a split of a second or less? why genesis 2:4 says that everything was created in ONE day? i think that if god would have given detailed description of the creation, none of us would understand it completely, and he wanted that everyone can read and understand his word. besides modern scientist are doing the same when they divide time periods in rough sections like jura or trias periods.
Bible says earth is flat too and no space.
Ken ham and sarafati are generally right chronology wise with bible, but on some key factors they are Wrong. Like:
-Terah was 70 when he had abraham
-Tower babel happened when sarah was 38 years old and abraham 48.
-430 year period began in abraham's days in Genesis 15 when he was 80 years in turn shem was 470. Totaling 900 years from exodus to shem's birth.
-Less than 480 years more like 400 to 380.
-Hebrew is a tint tighter than they wanna display.
-2000 and later for noah's flood earliest. Adam was made by Yahweh on the 6th day 3600 BCE or later at earliest.
-Beginning Genesis 1.1 with Yahweh birthing himself or popping to be from nothing straight is 3601 BCE or later at earliest ever.
But all this is more "1200"? no "1100"? no "800"? no "600"? or really 500-400 bce at earliest. Made up by wicked Hebrewish man. In their own Godless imaginations and Devilish rebellion against True God(s) The Makers and Enders of all they have.
Well-intentioned foolishness
What's wrong with his facial hair
#NotMyKenHam #HockIsBetter
What about time dilation? Gravity affect entropy (passage of time). When God is creating light still (Day 1), there is no earth yet. Why would you use a perspective of something that does not exist yet? God is everywhere, why is it impossible for God to be in an area where entropy happens slower (the passage of time is slower) in relation to where the earth is being created? If two humans are in two different places, one near a black hole (person A), and one on earth (person B), and 24 hours pass for person A the amount of entropy that occurs for person B is different. Person B, on earth would have billions of years worth of entropy, and person A would have 24 hours worth of Entropy.
God is everywhere, why would you pidgeon hole him into only perceiving time as it passes on earth, that does not yet exist in Genesis 1?
If God created 15-25-year-old humans (Adam & Eve) within a day, why can't he create a 13.7-billion-year-old universe in 6 days? Seriously, is one any easier than the other?
Well yeah.... I "created" kids in under 5 mins!
How was God created from nothing? How did god create everything from nothing. What the hell is nothing? Nothing never existed. If nothing did exist than that means nothing is something. Can something be nothing that is something?
How do Creationists explain the fact that stars can *STILL* be observed being created?
I have three theories for that:
1. The Genesis account does not suppose creation only happened on the 6 first days. Many living things were created in the first 6 days and they are still being created today. Actually Revelation states He will create the New Heaven and New Earth.
2. It takes time for light to arrive at us from other celestial bodies. If a star 6,500 light years away is seen today we may actually be seeing it 6,500 years ago.
3. Genesis is an account for the creation of the universe from nothing; light, energy, and matter came to exist. New stars being formed now are the result of previously existing matter, light, and energy. There is no new star, but simply a restructuring of previously generated components.
@@YoLo-bu2dy
Well bundle all that up into a peer reviewed scientific theory that doesn't just receive the usual reaction to ridiculous religious mumbo jumbo - scorn & laughter from the serious scientific community & you might be onto something..... Oh! & you'll need to provide some actual *PROOF* to back these inane ideas up!
@@YoLo-bu2dy
Just on the age of forming planets, You seem to hang some hopes on the fact that what we are seeing happened thousands of years ago. What, as will be the case, this same data & evidence puts these forming planets as *BILLIONS* of years old?
As an aside to that you also have to understand that cosmological physics is so well understood now that scientists can with 100% certainty say how & when a star will form, in other words that don't have to observe it to know that billions are probably being formed as we speak!
I would like for you to prove to me any scientific proof and evidence showing me a star being created, if I look up into the sky at night time and I see a star appear I can't assume that it's being created because clouds could be passing in front of the star in outer space debris can be passing in front of the star you assume that the Stars being created
The concept of an ancient near eastern genre doesn't fit in his non scholarly mind. Oh how noble of you Mr Ham to scoff at christian scholars without a scholarly rebuttal. You read scripture like a babe at best if you're gonna take all scripture from all genres at face value! If that's your blanket mechanism to facilitate hermeneutics, than you declare many parts of scripture shouldn't have made the cannon by osmosis
Iron Tommy - Right On, Bro!
What's so funny is that some of these people just come on here to comment stupid things about how dumb us Christians are. Does it ever make y'all feel dumb. Cause obviously you had to be having a stupid moment when you looked this up. Just saying
People find car crashes fascinating.......
True. I've been more concerned honestly, this shit is mind numbing
Wow, i really want to know what the authors of the BIBLE were smoking, looks like Ken Ham knows, i want some of that shit.
Cj Senanayake, smoking? How about eating? Search Google Image for "Catholic Church mushroom art"
There is also a good vid on that book: The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross
Ken Ham cannot apply critical thinking to what he reads in his Bronze Age bible.
Good talk.
I disagree with Ken Ham on one point. If you do not accept Genesis 1 as written, how can you be saved? You don't believe God. How can you be saved?
I came to salvation as a direct result of the Genesis creation story. I accepted that before I understood who Jesus was and why He died on the cross. When you reject God's Word in Genesis 1, you are making God out to be a liar. I don't think folks who make God out to be a liar will be in the Kingdom of Heaven unless they repent of that blasphemy.
This is because people always interpret the Bible in the traditional literal way. The Bible is copies of translations of Holy Scripture and it’s not a straight read by any means. The Bible is filled with allegorical language, the spiritualizing cannon, deliberate overlapping historic events, deliberate omissions, puns and parables just to mention a few. If you want to know what genesis 1 really means let me know and I can explain it to you it’s gonna be a bit long so if long replies make you cringe then you may wanna pass on this one. I’m a bible researcher and teacher. God bless
@@Farsadelcatolicismo - It sounds to me like you're a Bible twister. There is nothing in the text to indicate that Genesis is anything other than historical narrative.
From your description, you could twist and turn any passage of scripture any way you'd like. Is it still the inerrant Word of God? God has written the Bible that it should generally be understood. Certainly, the most important parts should be easily understood. I can read Genesis 1 to my 6-year-old grandaughter and she has no difficulty understanding it. Her childish understanding of Genesis 1 is perfectly acceptable to me. Genesis 1 is _foundational_ to the entire Bible. God has not given us an allegorical or obscure message. He has made himself quite clear, so that men might be saved. If the Bible is, as you say, "filled with allegorical language, the spiritualizing cannon, deliberate overlapping historic events, deliberate omissions, puns and parables," how would men know what it says and be saved?
I really don't need you to explain the meaning of Genesis 1. God is pretty good with language and has made Himself quite plain. I don't think God needs your help explaining Genesis 1 to people. What He does need you to do is to believe His Word.
--------------------------------
"Armor of the Faith"? - "Faith is the substance of things hoped for *the evidence of things **_not seen."_* (Hebrews 11;1. Also not allegorical.) No one _saw_ the creation of the world except God. The creation of the world and of Man was _not seen_ by men. If you want to exercise _faith_ and know what happened, you're going to have to accept as _evidence_ the testimony of God. God spoke as plainly as He would if He were a witness in a court of law. Genesis 1 is not allegory. It is not parable. It is historical narrative.
czcams.com/video/6tetauYS0rs/video.html
@@scubasteve7666 - You've got to be kidding. Stop wasting my time. Can't you even think for yourself?
@@rubiks6 Genesis fails from the very first page. Proven to be scientifically inaccurate.
The Earth was not made before our sun, nor was it made before the stars, the stars are not lights in a firmament; there is no firmament, and there are no waters above it.
The day and night could not have been created before the sun since the sun, together with the rotation of the Earth, gives us day and night.
Life did not appear suddenly on the Earth over the course of a few days; several billion years passed between the earliest life forms and those we can see today.
The Genesis creation story is a comedy of errors, and that allows us to draw a confident conclusion-Moses did not get the story from God. Which leaves only one possibility; the story came from the imaginations of men.
for lord one day is of 10000 years his mightiness and. highness greatness cant be expresed in words . he knows each and every stars in universe by name . how powerful is his mind power. god commanded and it be as it .
+Nikhil Shinde
Your same god endorsed owning human beings as property, made thought crime a sin, promoted misogyny, and orders genocide. The god of the bible is an immoral thug
You have not read Genesis, nor the other parts of the Old Testament in context. There were historical contexts during the times and places of slavery. The Old Testament had a judgemental reason for temporary rules on slavery. He didn't command slavery, but during his judgment, and during the economy and unjust nature of what happened during the Hebrew nation, and surrounding nations, God gave commands on how to deal with the issue of slavery. The Bible doesn't ignore actual history, but gives direction on how to deal with what was happening, and going to , and will happen. The Bible is true, and Jack44M is an immoral thug.
A day on earth is 24hours.
That's it's definition.
A few Questions for KEN HAM.
1.) Why do you IGNORE the foundational HEBREW wording of Gen.1:1, which declares in the "DATELESS PAST", ( Heb. "Rashith" ) Falsely translated "in the BEGINNING", in the KJV English translation.
( Which HEBREW wording refutes a young Earth )
2.) Why do you IGNORE the HEBREW Word "Shmim" , which is the PLURAL word "HEAVENS", Again Exposing the KJV English translation as being INCORRECT !!
3.) Why do you IGNORE the HEBREW word "HAYAH", in Gen.1:2, which means "BECAME", ....and is falsely translated in the KJV as "WAS", in regards to the sentence;..."and the EARTH , (Heb. ERETZ", meaning "DRY LAND" ) "BECAME" empty and void" ( Heb. "TOHU Va BOHU" ) and NOT the INCORRECT English KJV rendering of,..."WAS Empty and Void".
Please respond
Morgan Sorensen ( Theologian/ Bible Prophecy teacher )
Personally I think that's the last of his problems when the whole thing is a self evident crock of poop!
I liked what Ken said, but I was puzzled by him saying, 'millions of years' so much. The problem isn't 'millions of years', its the idea of evolution, that everything came into existence by accident, not by God. How much time has God seen past by Him, does the amount of time really matter? The simplest atom could never had come into existence no matter how much time went by. The focus should be on how ridiculous evolution is rather than its requirement for vast periods of time for it to happen in, although talking about the impossible probabilities of evolution happening in relation to time is a good discussion.
Possibly the reason that Ken repeats 'millions of years' so much is that he thinks that nothing (except maybe angels) were in existence beyond 6000 years ago? I like the way Ken emphasised taking the Word literally, within its context, and that there is no gap. We need to do this more with Genesis 1. Not only are people having difficulty with the word 'day' in Genesis 1 they are also having difficulty reading each verse in context with each other, like how we were taught at primary school when analyzing short stories.
BTW: when we are told that God made, created or formed something it doesn't necessarily mean that He did something instantly, ex nihilo (out of nothing). Eve was made from Adam, Adam from the earth, fish and birds from water, plants from earth and heaven from water. Earth appeared as a result of God simply moving some land. Even the light of Day 1 came from something here, as we will see later on. We are not told about the water and land being made, but more about that later as well. One thing that we know for sure from the Bible is that the water and the land were originally made ex nihilo by God's Word.
'And the evening and the morning were the @@@@@ day'. We have no reason to think that the first 3 of these are any different from the next 4 (the 7th day is still a 'day'). The only way we can have an evening and morning here is for the light that does this coming from a source external to our planet. This could only be our present sun because there is no hint of any other source.
What about the light of Day One? Here is something most of you have probably never noticed. The Apostle Paul tells us in 2 Cor 4:6 that the light God made the First Day came from the Darkness. Where was this Darkness? Paul was referring to the Genesis Creation account for his illustration and the Darkness is in verse 2. Verse 2 tells us that this Darkness was located next to the bottom of the water, near the sur-Face of the Deep. This would be Land since the word Deep, in this context, measures from the sur-Face of the waters to the sur-Face of the land below (knee deep, chin deep, 12 fathoms deep etc).
None of this land appeared above the water surface until Day 3 when the seas were made. Verse 2 says that 'the earth was without form and void' because it was under the water that the Spirit of God was hovering over. If we look closer at Day 3 we see that God had actually just made the 'seas' (plural). That means He made sea BASINS out of the land and the water flowed into these basins that God made deeper and deeper until the water level was below the original land level. The portion of the land sticking up above the water level forming the seashore became DRY. It it this portion of the land that God called 'Earth'. So on this day God didn't make any new matter, He simply moved some land. The existence of the earth was a consequence of making the seas. God did make new life, plant life, that grew out of the now dry land God called 'earth'.
How did the 'earth' get dry? On Day 2 we are told that God turned the middle portion of the water above the land of verse 2 into a firmament, which ended up in between an upper water layer and a lower water layer (it was this lower layer water that went into the seas of Day 3). God then called this firmament, 'heaven'. So God turned the water into another kind of substance. What is this substance? If we go to Day 5 we are told about God making from the water marine creatures and WINGED FOWL that flew in the open FIRMAMENT of HEAVEN (verses 20, 21). On Day 6 the fowl are linked to the AIR. This means that 'heaven' is in fact our atmosphere. All living things need air to breathe so it would makes sense to make the atmosphere before making the living things. The same goes for the DRY land, earth.
So verse 1 could be read as, 'In the beginning God made the atmosphere and the dry land'. 'Beginning' refers to the start of the creation process that lasted 7 days. 'Heaven' was made on the Day 2 and 'Earth' on Day 3, which is at the beginning of the week. So we could say, 'At the start of the week, God made the atmosphere and the dry land'.
Looking again at verse 2, we now know that the earth was without form and void because it was underwater and therefore nothing could live on it. If you look at Isaiah 45:18 you will see that God had formed, created and made the earth to be INHABITED. The expression 'without form and void' simply means 'uninhabitable'. It does not mean 'desolate wasteland' or 'chaos' as in the modern evolutionary sense. In Jerimiah 4:23+ we see that the earth was uninhabitable because of the devastation caused by the consequences of sin. Different causes, but the same effect... the land is uninhabitable.
Moses didn't write with chapters and verses. Verse 2 is simply a continuation of what was being said in verse 1. Moses was focusing on the 'earth' component to explain why the 'earth' and 'heaven' had to be made before the living things were made.
Getting back to the light on Day 1, this light is actually coming out of this planet so it could not be causing the evening and the morning. So what is this light? If we compare Day 1 with Day 4 there is an obvious connection between the operations of the sun of Day 4 and operations of the light of Day 1. What could this be? Could it be that God had set the conditions for the visible light spectrum on Day 1? The whole purpose of this creation week was to put to put two people made in God's image on this planet and they need the visible light spectrum to see.
Another question about Day 4 is why did God do anything to the sun and moon when they were already there? Consider the dramatic change that had come over this planet over the past 3 days. In verse 2 we have a water -covered planet with no atmosphere (or at least no troposphere/stratosphere) which had been changed to a planet with an upper layer of water (that spread the sun's warmth and light evenly around the world), the atmosphere (Air) and a mixture of seas and land masses with plant life on it. This is a dramatic change and it would be reasonable to think that there would have to be adjustments to how the sun and moon operated in relation to this planet and the life on it.
Weren't the stars made on Day 4? The original Hebrew says, 'the stars also'. In the KJV the words 'he made' are in italics indicating that they weren't a final translation and that the translators weren't sure what to put there. In Hebrew 'the stars also' have the sense that the stars were THERE!, in the sense of being already there, in other words, made before Day 4. Verse 16 specifies that only TWO lights were made on Day 4. Almost all the text except 3 words refer only to the sun and the moon. The purpose of mentioning the stars is to give God the credit for making them (ex nihilo), which is another way of saying that God was the one that had made the universe, including this planet.
No mention of the water and the land being made because it was already here before Day 1. This means that the solar system, the Milky Way galaxy and even the universe would have been here before Day 1. This means that all these had been made by God, along with the angels some time before. In this case it doesn't matter if this happened millions or trillions of years ago since God does everything by His Word, Ps 33:9 For He spake, and it was done; He commanded, and it stood fast.
The overall context of Genesis Chapter 1 (and 2) is the conflict between Christ and Satan. Considering that many angels had left their place in God's Tabernacle (Jude 1:6) to join Lucifer in his rebellion then it would be reasonable that God would want to refill those vacancies. Adam and Eve were made little lower than the angels (Ps 8:5) and Jesus stated that God's people would be made equal to the angels (Luke 20:36, Mat 22:30, Mar 12:25). So it would seem that was the original plan and that this plan is still in operation in spite of the problems caused by the fall of Adam and Eve into sin.
The Genesis Chapter One week, not just 6 days, is very important for the rest of the Bible. The fact that God is the creator shows that He can back up all His promises and keep things in order at all times. Sin on this planet need not to have happened, but it has and the Gospel story further reinforces just how great and reliable God is at all times.
If you think I'm going to wade through all that crap forget it but just go head to head with me on Evolution.
You won't because ignorant delusion & fuzzy feelings are more important to you than objective truth & proof obviously.
@@pup1008 I grew up assuming evolution was true because that what state schools taught. When I was a 19yo university student I actually read the Bible for myself and discovered that a lot of nonsense has been said about the Bible and God. I specifically checked the creation/evolution matter because I had always been keen on dinosaurs.
Evolution firstly depends on most people not knowing what the Bible actually says as distinct from what many 'churches' say. Anything goes with evolution. They even say something can evolve out of nothing with no cause. Impossible, requiring a faith that doesn't use evidence. An evolutionist museum curator, a phd, told me that there is no evidence for evolution in the fossils, yet he still believes in evolution. Evolution is a religion.
@@youkuya
Unlike your flavour of the many conflicting & competing "gods" that are out there, there is a mountain of *categorical, definitive & emphatic* evidence backing up & supporting everything we have discovered over the last 150 years. The fossil record alone is enough now to indisputably prove the theory & all that has now been backed up by supporting DNA evidence - There is *NO* doubt.
Even serious scientists like *Francis Collins* who is a fundamentalist Christian and head of the *Human Genome Project* somehow manages to smash his square delusional pegs into Sciences hard earned round holes in accepting evolution *IS* a fact!
I think spend less time with your head in the "Bumper Book of Nonsense" & listening to Creationist claptrap & more time objectively seeking truthful answers.
@@pup1008 an evolutionist curator at the museum in my state, a biologist, told me that there is no evidence in the fossils for evolution. If evolution was true the fossil record we do have should be a confused mass of intermediate specimens of all types.
Your resort to insults instead of facts is sad. I have read the Bible for myself and it is in harmony with science. Evolution is a religion without hope.
@@youkuya
Well I suggest the guy takes his thesis to be peer reviewed by secular science to become immensely rich & famous over night for overturning what is categorical proven fact!
One lunatic swallow about to be taken down by men in white coats carrying giant butterfly nets does not a summer or scientific theory make!
How & why do you people come out with such ridiculous "arguments" when you have a container ship full of counter evidence & facts against you? Oh! I know because warm delusional fuzzy feelings are more important to you than facts!
Brilliant. If part of the Bible is inaccurate then the whole Bible is in question. Genesis has to be accurate.
.... Or it's all a lie.
You're so close, keep researching and you'll be free of the religion forever.
It is accurate.
@@andrewoliver8930 If you're right that God does not exist then congratulations, you win nothing. If you're wrong then you lose an infinite amount. Not a good bet
@@MB-uw4xr Wasting the only life you'll ever have is a bit silly.
@@andrewoliver8930 James 4:14 kjv
You forgot the other 4,744,999,999,994 days
I laughed out loud XD
Who was there?
I watched the 4D movie at the Creation Museum, and I have to say that it was both inspiring and highly entertaining. My favorite part was when the Tyrannosaurus Rex gobbled up an entire watermelon in one bite. It perfectly demonstrated God's perfect design of its razor sharp dagger-shaped teeth, perfect for chomping through watermelon skin. This was before the great sin of Adam, who waged war against his creator by eating a fruit.
Are you serious?
Deep Heat Partially serious. I did view the 4D movie and enjoyed it. Beyond that, I like my humor dry. ;-)
@@RobGravelle
Like T-Rexs like their water melon seeded....
@@RobGravelle Tyrannosaurus rex was a carnivore
The 6 days of creation were not literal 24 hour days, they were epochs and were not even necessarily equal, certainly you have to accept that we live in the 7th day and having nearly 7,000 years history behind us ...
Therefore if you believe the days are equal you have to understand that the other days were at least 7,000 years long, interestingly that would make 7,000 x 7 times, 7 being the number used to denote something that is satisfactorily complete, or acceptable to God.
The days of creation were 24 hour days, they were not epochs of time, and the reading of the passage uses the same phrasing for the 6 days of creation. ...And there was evening, and there was morning, the ___ day.
How Yom is translated depends on the context of its use with other words in the sentence around it, using hermeneutics. After reading more then just one verse you will find the way Yom is being used is describing individual 24 hour days. Regardless of how you want to interpret it that is how the original hebrew explains it. You are quoting 2 Peters 3:8 where he says that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. Again, you can not just take things out of context. Peter is urging his audience to regard God as 'patient' in regard to bringing about the conclusion of His plan, rather than 'slow', and not to doubt His eventual arrival.
The 'scoffers' of earlier in the chapter are questioning whether God will return at all, given the apparent delay. Reread the chapter, how you connected dots from that to Genesis is amazing.
'Clues to Creation in Genesis' by PJ Wiseman might be a better place to start in looking at Genesis. A scholarly book, compiled by his son (professor of Assyriology at the University of London.) A google search might yield mention of the book at it's view.
A god that is invisible and unknowable does not exist. Therefore you must invent him.
Creationist scientists better get a move on. If the Jews prove god before the Christians it will be a Jewish god. If the Muslims win the race we'll all have to worship Allah. If the Hindus get their first we'll have a pantheon. No, don't worry. No one will be able to prove god exists. You might think the argument will go on between religions that their god(s) are the true god(s). No! All religions die and are replaced by new ones. It has been thus since man first invented a religion. How many religions have died and been superseded by new religions? Too many to mention.
This video led me to be firm about a belief in a six literal day creation. In addition to the evidence presented by Ken Ham, far more people in history have had the Bible available then have been presented Darwinian materials. And, the Bible has been around for over 1,700 years longer than the Darwinian theory of evolution. In our minds, the Bible has not been proven false no matter how many forceful proclamations the old earthers make.
Jack O'Scratch has the fallacy of trusting mainstream scientists without question! Those scientists claim the evidence is overwhelming but they fail to provide it! The atheists underestimate my determination to keep my belief in the Bible! If, the Bible is false then why didn't anti-Christian governments of the past keep it from becoming the most distributed book of all time? I think that if the Christian God is false, the Roman Empire would have killed off the Christian faith in the ancient times! And, the thug tactics used by some atheists to punish teachers for even questioning evolution leads me to believe in Creation more intensely! In behalf of low-income Christians like myself it is my highest duty to resist anti-Christian teachings! Trying to get me to go against the Bible would be like trying to get a furniture store to give you a free sofa! No matter how many rants the evolutionists put forth, they can't go back to the 18th Century and before and give their teachings to people who lived back then! I am calling on people to have the guts to resist this philosophy that has failed to get criminals to reform and has failed to improve society! I live in a low income apartment; Jack O'Scratch and those like him haven't proven that they don't live in gated communities, and I am not against everyone who lives in gated communities! And to show what I think about the evolutionist tactics, I will defend creation again in two weeks, except, I will reduce by one the day for every anti-creation rant placed under my thread!
If I knew who Jack O'Scratch' is and I was his boss, I would fire him for wasting time trying to convert someone to evolution who has indicated is not receptive to evolution! If, door-to-door proselytizers agreed to knock on five doors for every reply Jack O'Scratch gave there would be a lot more doors knocked by them. Jack O'Scratch resorted to name calling. Name calling just makes me double down on my beliefs more! I refuse to legitimize derogatory name calling. The bottom line is the Bible has been around over 1,700 years longer than Darwinism and neo-Darwinism. The evolutionists have failed to prove the Bible wrong as Ken Ham and others have shot down the dating methods claim. The only benefit I see for Jack O'Scratch and other evolutionists and atheists to continue to reply on this thread is that they are being paid for their replies. i am willing to answer honest questions if asked. But, if a person resorts to name calling, then I am through with them. I'm replying to those other than Jack O'Scratch. Don't blindly believe in everything evolutionists tell you! Seek the real truth! i believe with all my heart, I have found it in the Holy Bible! Voting for a better world and better eternity! I am done replying on this thread!
Youre cherry picking. do you drink water? If your god is real ,hes an imbecile. hows that possible? go enjoy your book that advocates slavery
Praise god!
Another victim of Ken Ham's Kool Aid .
Seriously Ken Ham is a former science teacher who did not understand the science he was teaching conflicted with his fundamentalist Bible beliefs. He had to find out accidentally through his own students.
Try listening to Hitchens and Harris if you ever decide to outgrow Ham's unvetted preachments.
Ken Ham is not an expert in his field or any field for that matter. He does not have a PHD. He does not cite PHDs. He is an affront to Christian scholarship. He is not a Bible scholar, or an scientist. Everything he has to say holds as bout as much weight of Wikipedia.
You know I flip & flop on this guy as to whether he believes this crap or he's actually in it for the money. I think he actually *BELIEVES* this crap!
I do too! I went to his museums and they aren't cheap! He might believe it and still be into the money as well. ;-)
I love the proof that all of the science to determine the age of an object is wrong. I believe Gods Word.
Joyce Yeshua true
You just choose to dismiss and ignore the evidence. Science is true whether you accept it or not and science has CONCLUSIVELY INDISPUTABLY DEBUNKED your word of sky fairy. Christianity is an objective lie. Science has PROVED that there was never an Adam and Eve. No Adam and Eve, no original sin. No original sin, no fallen world. No fallen world, no need for a savior. No ned for a savior and Christianity unravels. Evolution is a FACT whether you believe in it or not. Sorry.
Its not Gods word you have no proof medieval desert dwellers wrote it claiming it to be the word of god these idiots even thought the sun orbited the earth lol
Jack O'Scratch science openly is happy being right today and potentially wrong tomorrow.
Jack O'Scratch and yet Richard said he isn't 💯 there isn't a God........
I love how having dismissed dinosaurs for about *1,990* years they *NOW* have to be seen to embrace them with a big 'ol T-Rex sniffing Ham's arse there. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see him trying to shag a velociraptor on the next stage set!
Google, Aquilla Fleetwood, Night Signs, which proves Biblical creation!
What if god created evolution and evolve us into humans
ROAD To The Top god created everything i mean literally everything, it won't be false he created in 6 days
ROAD To The Top all bibles can't be false
U really didnt see the video!,
What if god evolved into us and we don't remember.
@Poco Loco The Christians are right to believe in zero evolution. The FSM made us 5000 years ago.
Scientists are silly.
R'amen.
Ken is awesome
Awesomely good at extracting money from gullible idiots!
Agree, he'd make a good comedian
Awesomely ignorant and stupidly delusional.
if you look up yom in the hebrew dictionary, yom only means time, not day, fail Ken ham, fail
Except the Jewish and Hebrew scholars tell us that it ususally means day, so you are wrong in saying it ONLY means time. He mentions that in his talk. Did you even listen? Or did you see and hear only what you WANT to see and hear?
How Yom is translated depends on the context of its use with other words in the sentence around it, using hermeneutics. After reading more then just one verse you will find the way Yom is being used is describing individual 24 hour days.
Religion has such outlandish claims from people indoctrinated at a young age. We shouldn’t believe in anything unless there is proof. However we should still be kind to those people who believe in this nonsense as it has been ingrained into them at a young age. They need sympathy as they are victims of being gullible and stupid.
Seymour Beaver the problem is they spread those lies to kids who are too young to question. Teaching evolution is the only right thing to teach
HAahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahhhhbaawwwwwhahahhahahhahhahhahhahahahahahah
Even if Ken Ham is right in his belief, the sarcastic way in which he presented his "evidence" completely removed his credibility. Maybe he should spend more of the presentation presenting facts about his belief instead of presenting and then bashing opposing views!
Here it is when it starts and it end up with people like Trump.
What do you believe?
I think it's just as well Ham found his little book of fairy tales & the super winged sky monkey to keep him occupied. He's narcissistic psychopathic demeanour has all the markings of a serial killer in my book!
Deep Heat There’s only one BOOK 📖 Friend
@@hismessengercsp2215
Is that the one that gets all the facts in relation to the creation of the planet & the ascent of life upon it totally wrong & tells us how to acquire, keep & beat slaves?
@@hismessengercsp2215 that's your problem.
Read more.
the older lava came from deep in the earth, it flowed out from within, so what
Zoeii ZiZZles what?
THERE IS NO GOD!!!!!!!!!
Well Noel Gallagher & Trevor Brooking come close!
looking for GARBAGE??? found here
“According to the language...context...literature....”
You’re not a Hebrew scholar, literary scholar, Historical ancient near Eastern scholar, or ANY kind of scholar.
YOU HAVE ZERO CREDIBILITY TO MAKE STATEMENTS ABOUT CULTURE, CONTEXT, LITERARY ANALYSIS, OR INTENT OF THESE SOURCE DOCUMENTS!
I do not believe in evolution. I have also different point of view on what the Bible says. Why?
Becouse I see it from the point about the narration starts! Where is the narrator at the begining?
Imagine that what is written. No light, complete darknes! BUT, he can feel the raging water and blowing wind!!!
SO, the narrator must stand on the surface on the bondaryless ocean,
hearing and feeling the strange wind from God. Thhat wind is going forth and back like going in circles.
SO what? SO the rest of the story is said from that perspective. The human point of view, NOT GOD'S!!!
SO, Bible talks about what the man saw what God was doing. To me that man was Logos.
And that is why he sees from his point of view, from his perspective that light is first than the sources of light!
And that why he sees light and then darknes - becouse the Earth is spinning with him on its surface.
By the way, what waters were spilleted? I suppose that the Wind from God had different temperature and moisture than the atmosfere above the ocean. Atmosfere was full of moisture, the clouds were low upon the surface of the see.
Probably that's why in second chapter there is written that there was no rain but the fogg was watering surface of the Earth.
So, first Bible does not teach about whole Universe, but only about creating the Earth as we see it.
Second, it looks that our home - the land, the see and the atmosfere and everything that live whithin it was created in six days!
I see that some problems my narration puts in reasonable order, harmonizing Bible with science discoveries.
But I still believe God's Word, not materialistic, satanic narration of unbelivers. God bless you!
Did God speak the universe into existence? Or breath life into Adam?
What a bunch of nonsense! And unethical!!!!
*MAN!* I detest Ken Ham! 😠
The earth is around 6300 years
Also flat
No it's not
@@IIrandhandleII
And the centre of the Universe!
@@pup1008 - Have you not heard of relativity? Every reference frame is valid. Does the Earth go around the Sun? Of course, it does. Does the Sun go around the Earth? Of course, it does. Do you use words like "sunrise" and "sunset"? Of course, you do.
Think.
@@rubiks6
From the perspective of the Earth for which & on which the bible was written its not!
Yet another example of you idiot dishonestly trying to smash your ridiculous Square pegs of Delusion into hard-earned secular science's round holes of factual reality!
You're dopey church was happy enough to jail *Galileo* for stating exactly that Earth orbited the sun rather than the reverse biblical take so stop trying to hide behind the skirts of science. You don't belong there and they don't want you there!
What's wrong with his facial hair
What's wrong with your name, fixtehfernback ?