Ken Ham's Foundations: In Six Days Part 2

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 3. 05. 2020
  • Additional teaching video for IncrediWorld VBS.
    What difference does it make today whether the “days” of Genesis 1 were real 24-hour days or millions of years? Here, Ken Ham clears up today’s common misunderstandings in the debate about the “six days” of Creation. (2 parts)
    Learn more at AnswersinGenesis.org

Komentáře • 15

  • @lisashao2449
    @lisashao2449 Před rokem +4

    Amen
    The Holy Bible is absolutely true. God is the same yesterday, today and forevermore. Thank you LORD Jesus for lifting up this ministry. Your Word never return in void.
    God bless

  • @revv45acp71
    @revv45acp71 Před rokem +1

    Thank you! Hopefully more people will see this and be convicted by the Truth you present!

  • @josephbaker5810
    @josephbaker5810 Před rokem +5

    Science always has and always will have a strong element of speculation and is always changing. History never changes and neither does God ever change. We change and our opinions change. Truth does not change.

  • @littlebitsofbliss
    @littlebitsofbliss Před 2 lety +5

    Thank you so much for sharing this video!
    This video has had so few views and likes in comparison with videos on various old earth interpretations, because sadly these views are so pervasive in the world and the church!
    I, myself, was beginning to fall for these interpretations because the “science” was so compelling! But none of it quite settled with me!
    Thank you Ken Ham for standing up for the truth of the Bible and showing us the flaws in modern science!

  • @ambu6478
    @ambu6478 Před rokem +1

    Thank you Ken Ham for being one of the few Christian leaders to stand on authority of God's Word! It seems to me that if the evil one wanted to break down the foundation of the Bible and the belief in God , he would start with the beginning,Genesis.If he can put doubt into the weak minds of human beings concerning the first book of the Bible, he can cause thousands and perhaps millions to doubt the rest of God's Word and maybe God altogether.

  • @user-vn8so9rf3d
    @user-vn8so9rf3d Před 8 měsíci

    No one answers my questions - Yes Genesis writes about the Flood and I see its spiritual meanings.
    But no ancient writings mention the many asteroid impacts. Surely in such a short time frame, people would have recorded the Chicxulub impact and its devastation round the globe. Add in Vredefort impact crater. These craters exist and can be interpreted to find the size of the asteroid and the catastrophic results. Add in the recently discovered Deniliquin crater, likely to be magnitudes larger, but heavily eroded... Add in the Theia impact - Scientists report finding chunks from this impact down close to our core.
    Need some help here please.

  • @shaark92
    @shaark92 Před 2 lety +2

    thanks for adding part 2. I purchased Mr. Ham's "Six Days" book and dvd from their website after visiting The Ark Encounter earlier this summer.
    HIGHLY HIGHLY recommend The Ark Encounter, by the way.

  • @angelalmansa9226
    @angelalmansa9226 Před rokem

    according to Genesis1:14 the Sun and moon were created on the fourth day. We measure a 24 hour day by 1 full rotation of the sun so how can the first three days be a regular 24 hour day?

  • @krakoosh1
    @krakoosh1 Před rokem

    Any attack on Gods word is an attack on the cross of salvation. The only reason we know we need a savior is because of Genesis

  • @thediamondcreeper7566
    @thediamondcreeper7566 Před 4 měsíci

    What about dinosaurs?

    • @AnswersVBS
      @AnswersVBS  Před 4 měsíci

      Please see answersingenesis.org/dinosaurs/

  • @ericmatthaei9711
    @ericmatthaei9711 Před rokem +1

    The authority of the Bible rests on the person and work of Jesus Christ. The historicity of His death and resurrection means that He is true God and true Man. But Ken Ham is right about the attack on Genesis 1 being an attack on the cross. If you are unwilling to believe something that God asserts so unambiguously in His Word - when you abandon it under such superficial (and I dare say such superstitious) attack, is there anything that you are willing to trust simply because God says so? Are you not saying that there are parts of God’s Word that are not God’s Word, and that you will allow vain philosophies (sometimes called “science”) to sit in judgment over which parts are or are not true? So, it’s not that biblical inerrancy rests on Genesis 1, but it cannot stand without it.