Cosmic Background BREAKTHROUGH: Revealing the Big Bang
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 05. 2024
- Join my mailing list briankeating.com/list to win a real 4 billion year old meteorite! All .edu emails in the USA 🇺🇸 will WIN!
In 2001, my colleagues Andrew Lange, Jamie Bock, and William Holzapfel came up with a proposal for what would later be called BICEP. BICEP is an international collaboration that uses telescopes at the South Pole to look for signs of what happened moments after the Big Bang. In this video, I tell you everything you need to know about the program, the progress they've made, and what's next!
Additional resources:
➡️ Follow me on your fav platforms:
✖️ Twitter: / drbriankeating
🔔 CZcams: czcams.com/users/DrBrianKeatin...
📝 Join my mailing list: briankeating.com/list
✍️ Check out my blog: briankeating.com/cosmic-musings/
🎙️ Follow my podcast: briankeating.com/podcast
Into the Impossible with Brian Keating is a podcast dedicated to all those who want to explore the universe within and beyond the known.
Make sure to subscribe so you never miss an episode!
#intotheimpossible #briankeating #BICEP - Věda a technologie
Win a meteorite- the villain of my book Losing the Nobel Prize 😅. Enter here when you join my mailing list here 👉 briankeating.com/list ✉️ 💥
Good video... can't wait for more... long way we have come and will go... together.
With all of the up coming stuff you are to cover, I need to get another freezer for the basement to keep the ice in I will need to keep my brains cool while watching!😜
As for the whole "all possible universes can and therefore do exist" notion, that still hinges on logical reasoning lacking in solid premises, so presuppositions, and therefore cannot be claimed a truth as much as a possibility, which says little about probability in not only a mathematical, but in a within whatever all governs it way, which most likely will also have principles and laws we are yet unfamiliar with... So I am not holding on to any conclusions as of yet, and just staying tuned where the evidence is pointing and luring science to follow. I'm glad to have you and other great science communicators as a guide!🥰🥳👍👍👍
Big Bang never happened - JWST
Brian you would be a great cohost on Joe Rogan. You are clearly very image conscious and love the attention.
QSSC theory has explained CMB using dust thermalization then how BICEP can help to differentiate between inflationary cosmology vs QSSC
BICEP may be nice. But even more important are the recent discoveries (WMAP and Planck satellite) of the CMB quadropole and octopole alignment with the axis of our solar system (i.e our Sun's axis) ad the motion of our galaxy inside the cosmos. This suggest what I suspect all along; that the CMB distribution of r360 degrees radiation energy is NOT an extra galactic source (e.g. our big bang) but simply the result of the charge density inside our galactic plane itself and our solar system motion through it, as well. It is a form of Cherenkov radiation, courtesy of extra galactic charged particles entering our galaxy as well as the transition of intergalactic radiation entering the boundries of our solar system. It has most likely nothing to do with any big bang, eventhough the oscillating universe is of course still the correct cosmogenesis narrative. CMB however is not related to our cosmic birth. Lets just move on from this flawed assumption....
Twenty years ! Time flies. The three year hangover however, was awful. Retrospectives have become kinder and gentler now. A lot folks just assumed BICEP was toast. Now they'll know why resilience won out
Amazing experiment, congrats to all team....
Thanks my friend
Zero conclusive evidence... liked your brutal honesty
wow interesting stuff.... just discovered you today from abhijit chavda sir's podcast.
Welcome friend!
Process of elimination is helpful.. I completely agree!
I'm delighted to learn of a new universal feature: the cosmic schmutz.
Right? That's funny as hell..
Can you do a video on what the Hubble tension is and how it relates to the work done by the Nobel Prize winners for the discovery of an accelerating universe. Did it exist then? If not has it affected the work that was done for the discovery of the accelerating universe?
Not to brag, but I been working on my BICEPs too.
I honestly can't see any inflation taking place.
Good on you
@@andrewmoonbeam321 haha got me
BICEP2 announcement a “disconfirmed”result.
I guess that’s one way of putting it, so to speak
💪
Brian great job as always.
I appreciate that
'As above so below'. While impetus may have something to do with what we can see (meaning the observer may have some range of determination) i think it probably works in a fashion we wouldnt be unfamiliar with. It depends upon whos in charge and what they have need for. 'Principalities and powers'. There are those who come before us and you cant make presumptions regarding things that are not yours based on rules we would have little knowing of
when doc brian talks, people listen -- as always thx for bringing this to us in such a clear manner
Love to hear this
In an infinite multiverse, everything that can happen, happens infinite times. There isn't just an exact duplicate of this universe bubble somewhere, there are infinite copies of every possible universe.
Thanks Brian. As you noted there are bouncing cosmology models that replace inflation. The tensor-scalar ratio may not be a definitive differentiator between inflation and bounce models, given that bounce models can enhance the scalar modes post bounce. Also, isn’t the tensor scalar ratio somewhat deceptive since lensing effects can contaminate the amplitude? I know you don’t post many technical talks, but would like to see one on primordial BB, expected signatures from inflation and bounce models.
Great point!
I would love a video explaining what the CMB picture actually is visualizing. Why is it egg shaped? Is it the same image if taken from north and South Pole some how or a compilation of space all around us etc
The "egg shape" I can answer. It's data taken from all around us, then flattened to look at. Like a map of a globe is also egg shaped. There is more to it, of course but that's a short answer. Hope it helps. :)
The idea that everything that can happen does happen strikes me as an attractive simplification: we no longer have to ask, why this rather than that? Instead, we've got "this" over here and "that" over there, and what you see is dependent on where in the multiverse you are, and among all observers in every branch of the multiverse, everything that can be observed is observed. Neat!
Everything that can happen, happens regardeless if there is a multiverse or not... It's not because there are infinite possibilities, but rather because there is only one possibility, that possibility is reality.
@@JohnDoe-jw7cj Sooo-- why is there only one possibility? Why this reality rather than another one? Is it really obvious that there are no, and never were, any alternatives? That strikes me as a rather difficult question.
@@Nogill0it’s honestly a nonsensical question. If there’s an infinite multiverse, why that instead of just one universe or a different infinite multiverse? At the end of the day, reality is what it is bc that’s just how it is. It doesn’t need to have a reason, it’s just what exists. There is a point where explanations become meaningless, bc there has to be a base reality to reference with your explanation.
@@Nogill0 There are alternatives in our theoretical models of reality, not in reality itself.
Possibilities exist only because of the holes in our knowledge and understanding.
Suppose we somehow prove the multiverse, then the question "why isn't it only one universe instead" is answered by the theory that predicts the multiverse.
@@Jm-wt1fs I think the issue resolves into that of no boundaries vs boundaries. If we say in any sense that the universe has a boundary of any sort-- then it seems natural to ask what is beyond the boundary. A finite universe or an infinite universe? Do we have a crystal shell or a tricky geometry? No boundaries is just easer to deal with, for me at least. There ARE physicists who make a good case for a multiverse. An infinite universe already gives you one form of multiverse.
Every US youtuber still use the WMAP map for the CMB
There's some very impressive engineering coming out of all this. Physics, though, not so much.
Science is good for going to other planets (maybe someday) but not to answer the big questions.
You are such an impressively honest person. Thank you.
I appreciate that!
Karma cuts down the possibilitrees quite effectively
≈ rough area of the disk of the Milky Way galaxy (≈7×10^41 m^2)
"20 years ago this year"? 🤫
🎉
Otw to my bicep experiment now, how much can they take?
Dang! … some good ganja someone smoking.
😅
someone tell me why Losing the Nobel Prize isn't an arrogant title lol
I love this what you are doing sir. Helping me keep up with with what's up above!
Also, 🇨🇦♥️💙🇮🇱✌️
Love it!! 🇮🇱 🇺🇸
Nice tip-of-the-hat.
You bet!
Inflation is a deistic claim.
It is the Bible Genesis claim. A different view that of Aristotle, then also St.Thomas Aquinas: God and the Universe exist eternally although as in logic "antecedent" precedes "consequent" in the complex sentence: "if p, then q" (p,q-any sentence); "precedes" has nothing to do with time "before" or "after"!
so would redshift then be umm, devilish?
@@meesalikeu Redshift is definitely Devilish. The Word of God says God holds the cosmos in the palm of His hand. It says nothing about expanding and filling all of heaven with its carnal knowledge.
Every god loves a little fellatio now and then, we just can't let it go to their heads or they become real dicks and docks for TikTok stalks
iPhone 13? lol you mean my 15 max?
There is no expansion. Spacetime doesn't exist .
Top teir clown comment, the expansion has already been proven. Where's your proof for your claims? Does working at McDonald's make you an expert, lol.
😂🤡🤡🙄🙄
maybe with L.I.S.A in 2039 we can figure out if inflation and the multiverse are real....
You only think that your measuring gravitational waves, but you're not.
Sky scholar debunked cosmiccmicrowave background
This video did not succeed in explaining what he was talking about.
This was Science With All the Gobbledygook.
That man is Not a scientist
Would you care to elaborate?
@@TheUltimatePositionOfPower he does not
Just curious where you got your Ph.D from?
Please stop taking oxygen away from other humans. I'm so sick and tired of your short bus brain individuals.
The dude said 2001 was 20 years ago this year... He can't do math I'm not listening to this non sense