@@JohnWiIkesBooth A film shouldn't have that many jump cuts for no reason. No new information is conveyed by these cuts, they happen for no reason, nor is anything stylized by these cuts. You could remove half the cuts in this scene, and not only would it change nothing that's being told, but it would look better with the rest of the movie which is known for it's long sweeping shots so have sporatic cuts during talking scenes makes no sense. It's not even Shot-Reverse-Shot cuts, it just cuts to random footage like some amateaur.
I love how one cut is just dedicated to him pulling a chair out from the table, like pulling the chair is vital info to the audience that needs to be addressed or else the whole scene is off.
@@Ps3Aaron1 Either that or they could have had a longer "Sunday Church"-line, and then a full shot of the pulling of the chair which you'd only hear interrupt his line of thought. Would have emphasized the drama more, I think.
@@anthonyvillanueva5226 It's because they keep switching shots literally every 2 seconds with each character being on the complete other side of the screen. It's very tiring having to look across the screen at such a frequent rate, just because the director/editor forgot about staging and compositing a movie so it doesn't give their audience a headache trying to follow along
I remember this came out at the height of Game of Thrones and it was the first thing I saw Aiden Gillan in besides Littlefinger so that was on my mind instead of the editing
It’s not just the editing, it’s the blocking and the shots that are off-putting. Reid and his guy simply materialize at the other end of the table like video game characters.
The two go hand in hand. The reason the editing looks so poor is because the direction is spotty, and they didn't get to go back to do reshoots. Notice how there isn't a single shot of the entire band in one frame once John sits down? The editor had to stitch together a bunch of singular shots to show all of their reactions, because they didn't shoot any wides.
@@trevorerickson5205 And thats' why the actual brick building looks fine, but the background is blurry as can be, (although this upload in general is bad.) I could be wrong but they background is complete computer layers so they could get the appropriate bridge/cars/buses from the time period.
Daffodil Yellow because it’s useless information for the audience. Neither of the reactions express anything important or notable, so there’s no reason they couldn’t have remained on the executive sitting down and cutting after he starts talking. They could’ve cut to a random squirrel instead and achieved the same continuity as they did highlight the Queen members.
@@aaronshouting588 I thought whoever played Brian May was really good. Looked and sounded nearly the same as him. Ruined by terrible script and production
AD The Kid It’s interesting how differently Reid is portrayed in the two films. He’s very handsome and sexually powerful in Rocketman... less so in this. If the depictions had been more similar, it would have made them seem more reliable. That said, two people can perceive a person very differently.
Rocketman is about Elton's mind. He saw John Reid as a jerk, because their relationship didn't work out. Just like he saw his father as some cold blooded monster, which he wasn't.
Black Parade read his auto biography John wasn’t as bad but it highlighted the events of Eltons life very well and John Reid definitely cheated on him and hit him a lot
I had to shut this off halfway through because the constant cutting was giving me a migraine. Yeah, if this is what the Academy considers Best Editing... who needs 'em?
@@yveltalpoderoso1303 Maybe but it didn't deserved to win Best Editing at all because of this. Best Editing is where the movie was edited well from start to finish, here there's one particular scene where they messed up in the editing
It really feels that the shots of Gwilym Lee were not recorded at the same time as the rest of the scene, since he rarely shares a shot with the rest of the actors
It's like the editor wanted to show every single reaction and facial expression in this scene and it didn't add at all to the movie. (That's what I felt at least)
“Has it ever struck you that life is all memory, except for the one present moment that goes by you so quick you hardly catch it going?”― Tennessee Williams.
@@ItsJenniBear ...yes it does. The 180 degree rule applies whenever you're shooting something. Obviously there are times when you might purposefully break the rule but that's usually when you want the audience to feel disoriented. Idk why you would want your audience to feel disoriented in this scene at all.
Jack Brodke ..yes but there’s not really a possible way to keep a 180 degree rule in a 5 person dialogue scene where they’re sitting in a circle. you break it on scenes with multiple people dialogue so that you can have close ups on each group member. Find me a 4-5 person dialogue scene where they’re sitting in a circle, one close up on each member, and the 180 rule isn’t broken. lol
@@TheTonyEntertainment When shooting a scene you should draw a straight line through the area that you are shooting in. The camera can only stay on one side of that line because as soon as you cross it the direction everyone is looking flips and it becomes extremely disorienting for an audience to watch. If you physically move the camera to the other side of the line though it's okay. You just can't cut to the other side when your previous shot was on a certain side of the 180 line. Hope that makes sense.
@@albertlavinski797 Did they show them movies like Taken 3 or Paul WS Anderson movies which had one of the most atrocious editing in a movie of all time?
The academy gave this the best editing because this film had 2 directors and a mess of a production, and the editor is basically the whole reason the producers could salvage something out of it.
Let's be real, the one scene that the Academy thinks is Best Film Editing worthy was just the Live Aid scene. They clearly overlooked this scene because how the Live Aid scene was competently made from every aspect
The editing here reminds me of the episodes of Power Rangers where they wanted to hide the fact that half the cast had walked off or that they were shooting episodes while in Australia. The latter, whenever one character in the Command Center started talking to Zordon, it was all ADR and the camera would show us a totally different ranger reacting. The blocking and cinematography also did this scene no favors.
0:42 Aidan Gillen Among the supporting roles, I like the most. There is a presence in acting. 0:59 Feelings are appearing in an instant, this face！Great.
Holy Christ, I don't think there were enough cuts in this minute and forty five second clip! There were parts where I almost realized which character was being shown, and who was talking to who... God damn, I'm surprised they didn't cut to birds flying by, or kids riding by on bikes. Also really glad we got that invaluable close up of the guy picking up the chair, important stuff to show us right there! I mean the audience clearly would think that this guy must have been magical, and floating in mid air if they didn't clearly establish and show us that he grabbed a chair to sit in! On a more serious note, glad to see all the comments calling out the editing, and comparing it to the fence jump scene in Taken 3. It's so off putting to have a scene of people sitting around a table and talking edited like a Jason Bourne fight scene... and that's not even taking into account the awkward and confusing framing of the shots, and total lack of any sort of in camera continuity with the sense of space and direction. Guessing the people who decided this deserved the Oscar for Best Editing were on the same Crystal Meth that whoever edited this was on. Ill be right back, going to watch the clip again and count the cuts... 60 cuts! 60 fucking cuts in less than 2 minutes, with the longest single uncut shot lasting just under 9 seconds. Holy shit dude!
"...a scene of people sitting around a table and talking edited like a Jason Bourne fight scene..." Not to mention the fact that both The Bourne Ultimatum and Bohemian Rhapsody won the Oscar for Best Film Editing.
Forget the editing, the answer about what makes them different is pretty much the same thing all those other bands would say. Outsiders, playing for outsiders. Different. A family. All unique. Did the writer think this was profound or something?
Actually the writer thought he was taking directly from an actual Freddie interview. And it's not just about outsiders playing for outsiders. The point is even the band itself is made up of outsiders who have little in common.
@@DysnomiaFilms It's something you can't avoid commenting on when discussing Queen. Their combination of personalities really shouldn't have worked, yet it did.
Freddie Mercury: I'll tell you what it is. Our movie is still gonna win an Oscar for best editing despite looking like a cheap action movie. John Reid:Well I'm sold.
Its not even just the rapid editing, it's also that they use the worst possible times to rapid edit. "And you..." (Cut to Freddie) (cut to somebody else) "must be Freddie mercury" (cut back to him... after he finishes that line?).
BRAND NEW FREDDIE MERCURY SONG, TIME NOW UP ON MY CHANNEL!!
“So this is Queen”
Next shot proceeds to show 3/4 of Queen
Hello dear
Thomas Flight?
lmao! Brian got axed 🪓😂💀😂
que dise ay
Liam Neeson jumping over a fence had less jump-cuts than this.
Your name should not be remembered.
Okay it's not THAT awful.
There aren't any "jump cuts" though....
I didn't notice it, I think thats just the way a film works bruh.
@@JohnWiIkesBooth A film shouldn't have that many jump cuts for no reason. No new information is conveyed by these cuts, they happen for no reason, nor is anything stylized by these cuts. You could remove half the cuts in this scene, and not only would it change nothing that's being told, but it would look better with the rest of the movie which is known for it's long sweeping shots so have sporatic cuts during talking scenes makes no sense. It's not even Shot-Reverse-Shot cuts, it just cuts to random footage like some amateaur.
It’s great when a biopic on queen is presented like an action sequence from taken
No Taken was good. It was TAKEN 2 and TAK3N
I love how one cut is just dedicated to him pulling a chair out from the table, like pulling the chair is vital info to the audience that needs to be addressed or else the whole scene is off.
That's one of the few cuts in the scene that actually makes sense and has a narrative purpose.
The idea behind it was for the chair to interrupt their conversation. This fails because they only show half of the band reacting to it.
@@Ps3Aaron1 Either that or they could have had a longer "Sunday Church"-line, and then a full shot of the pulling of the chair which you'd only hear interrupt his line of thought. Would have emphasized the drama more, I think.
you are just wining at this point. This was the one of the only legitimate cuts that required for the flow of that scene
It's so weird how I didn't notice this editing in the theater, now I can never unsee it
I didn't know what it was when I saw it in the theater, but I came out of the scene feeling really tired eyes for some reason
@@anthonyvillanueva5226 It's because they keep switching shots literally every 2 seconds with each character being on the complete other side of the screen. It's very tiring having to look across the screen at such a frequent rate, just because the director/editor forgot about staging and compositing a movie so it doesn't give their audience a headache trying to follow along
I felt pretty dizzy after looking those weird choppy edits once I saw this movie at a theater!
I remember this came out at the height of Game of Thrones and it was the first thing I saw Aiden Gillan in besides Littlefinger so that was on my mind instead of the editing
@@alexbrettw Rob Stark played the exact same real life figure in Rocketman
Yeah yeah, of course, best film editing... Damn.
Might wonder how it got nominated for ”Best Editing” or something.
I think the best film editing was for the live aid scene alone... This scene was the result of dexter Fletcher handling a Bryan singer scene
"BUT IT HAD THAT ONE SCENE WHERE THEY USED REAL FOOTAGE!"
One really well-edited scene, doesn't make up for half-assing the rest of the film.
It won the Oscar mostly for its sound editing
jemimallah yeah it does sound like a fanfic tbh that might explain why I burst out laughing all the time lol
I could dice an onion using this video.
That could be the point
Savage 😆😆😆
😂😂😂😂
I don’t get it
Wait now I do
It cuts sharp?
It’s not just the editing, it’s the blocking and the shots that are off-putting. Reid and his guy simply materialize at the other end of the table like video game characters.
As i type i stand in the place this was shot
No, it is the editing…
The two go hand in hand. The reason the editing looks so poor is because the direction is spotty, and they didn't get to go back to do reshoots. Notice how there isn't a single shot of the entire band in one frame once John sits down? The editor had to stitch together a bunch of singular shots to show all of their reactions, because they didn't shoot any wides.
Now I can't unsee the bad editing in this scene because of that meme
which one
I can't unsee the bad editing because of the video that dissected the editing of this scene.
I can't unsee the bad editing in this scene because of the bad editing in this scene.
i never even pay attention to editing but this...
that's because good editing isn't noticeable. That's why it's good.
You're not supposed to pay attention to editing if it's any good
@@strahljd Though it does depend on whether an abrupt cut has a purpose that it achieves well enough
Not in this case, but still
That’s because you’re not supposed to lol
You should watch Taken 3 or even Paul WS Anderson movies, you would pay attention a lot to the editing in those movies 😂
The Oscars lost their credibility years ago but awarding this atrocity best editing was the final nail in the coffin.
I have no idea how I didn't notice this in the theater
Atheists: Satan doesn't exist
1:08
I believe more in satan than God tbh
Over 60 cuts in like 2 minutes...
If there really was 2 minutes, there would be like extra 20 shots in it
To be fair, the frequent cuts distract from the bad wigs and obviously green screened background.
bad wigs or bad period piece dialogue always is a fucking eye sore in my book. this movie had nothing believable.
It’s not a green screen
@@trevorerickson5205 0:21 that whole background is greenscreened. You can tell by the edges around the actors and their hair.
This scene was filmed at an actual restaurant I think. Somewhere in London probably.
@@trevorerickson5205 And thats' why the actual brick building looks fine, but the background is blurry as can be, (although this upload in general is bad.) I could be wrong but they background is complete computer layers so they could get the appropriate bridge/cars/buses from the time period.
0:33 "So this is Queen" Yeah, mostly.
lmao! Brian got axed 😂💀😂
Y'all seeing bad editing but I see how weird Littlefinger's hair is.
MagdaGRA bruh I was just about to say that
Its the 70s, they had those shitty hairstyles back then
Hello dear
0:35 Littlefinger’s descendant, Pointerfinger
Bane?
This hurts my eyes.
0:27 those two reaction shots are the stupidest things I've ever seen
How so? I don't understand ?
Daffodil Yellow because it’s useless information for the audience. Neither of the reactions express anything important or notable, so there’s no reason they couldn’t have remained on the executive sitting down and cutting after he starts talking. They could’ve cut to a random squirrel instead and achieved the same continuity as they did highlight the Queen members.
@@siphillis oh.
How am I supposed to get any information from those shots? The actors looked like they were settling between takes.
Just swap different shots
Nearly a full minute of Queen patting themselves on the back
they won something for best editing or most editing?
In fact they won the most Oscars of the night. :)
@@TheaterPup But did they deserve it tho
@@TheNraveles Rami Malek did. Not sure about the rest lmao
@@niamunt yeah, Rami was the only halfway decent aspect of this overrated crap
@@aaronshouting588 I thought whoever played Brian May was really good. Looked and sounded nearly the same as him. Ruined by terrible script and production
The fact that this movie won "Best Editing" is beyond me lol.
Just watched Rocketman and I'm not 100 percent sure if John Ried was that bad of a jerk, but I believe Elton
AD The Kid It’s interesting how differently Reid is portrayed in the two films. He’s very handsome and sexually powerful in Rocketman... less so in this. If the depictions had been more similar, it would have made them seem more reliable. That said, two people can perceive a person very differently.
@@sallynewman6409 Yeah which makes sense because Elton was obviously closer to John then Freddie Mercury
Rocketman is about Elton's mind. He saw John Reid as a jerk, because their relationship didn't work out. Just like he saw his father as some cold blooded monster, which he wasn't.
Black Parade read his auto biography John wasn’t as bad but it highlighted the events of Eltons life very well and John Reid definitely cheated on him and hit him a lot
Black Parade not him him a lot but cheated on him
is this a parody or was it really this bad?
This is the original... sadly lol
You wanna see something bad! Watch the Micheal Jackson movie starring Flex Alexander.. It will make this movie look like an Oscar worthy film..
Kenrick Eason the funny part is that it actually won an Oscar for editing
@@morgantaylor7216 and malek won an oscar for best actor
@@morgantaylor7216 -- Great marketing. Got nothing to do with actual editors voting on their peers.
John Ottman had probably watched Requiem For A Dream before going into the editing room that day.
He should stick to composing film scores.
Even he admitted that if he was ever given a chance of making an extended cut, his first priority would be to recut that scene
I had to shut this off halfway through because the constant cutting was giving me a migraine. Yeah, if this is what the Academy considers Best Editing... who needs 'em?
damn i didnt notice til you said something
To be honest this is the only bad edited scene in the movie
@@yveltalpoderoso1303 Maybe but it didn't deserved to win Best Editing at all because of this. Best Editing is where the movie was edited well from start to finish, here there's one particular scene where they messed up in the editing
When John says every bands not queen I love how Brian turned around and smiled
It really feels that the shots of Gwilym Lee were not recorded at the same time as the rest of the scene, since he rarely shares a shot with the rest of the actors
When I saw this in theaters I thought this scene was a little frantic but actually noticing it now I am getting whiplash from this
0:46 Roger's thinking reaction here actually does remind me of real life Roger in interviews at times.
Anybody else here after seeing Rocket Man?
Right here. Honestly, very weird to see this John Reid after seeing how he was in Rocketman
@@steevysleepy7326 Here, he was a fairly decent person but in Rocketman, he was no different from Prenter.
I find it funny that Richard Madden's John Reid was more like Littlefinger than Aiden Gillen's John Reid.
reminds of taken 3 when there was 50 cuts of just liam neeson jumping over a goddamn fence
"Every band wants more"
"Every band is not Queen"
I know that Queen is huge now and we know they're incredible, but saying that to the guy signing you on is actually super rude I mean... wow...
@@senseweaver01 Yeah it’s just shitty dialogue by bad screenwriters lol.
It's like the editor wanted to show every single reaction and facial expression in this scene and it didn't add at all to the movie. (That's what I felt at least)
every cut makes my eyes feel like they are being betrayed
Aidan Gillen is slowly becoming the King of Movie Scene Memes. I find it glorious.
He's a big guy.
I can think of this and the dark knight rises. Are there other meme scenes that he’s in?
@@alosim1541 That's it so far. Still, I think it's a wonderful start!
@@arditeider2812 For You.
@@alosim1541 Game of Thrones?
“Has it ever struck you that life is all memory, except for the one present moment that goes by you so quick you hardly catch it going?”― Tennessee Williams.
62. That's the number of cuts in this one scene.
Littlefinger gave up on the iron throne and went into music, I see
Person: Hey
*shot cut*
man
*shot cut*
so
*shot cut*
how's
*shot cut*
the
*shot cut*
new
*shot cut*
song
*shot cut*
coming
*shot cut*
along?
*shot cut*
Other person: Pretty
*shot cut*
good,
*shot cut*
almost
*shot cut*
finished!
YALL HEARD OF THE 180 DEGREE RULE? JEEZ
Chloe Berger 180 degree rule doesn’t really apply when you have a dialogue scene with multiple characters
@@ItsJenniBear ...yes it does. The 180 degree rule applies whenever you're shooting something. Obviously there are times when you might purposefully break the rule but that's usually when you want the audience to feel disoriented. Idk why you would want your audience to feel disoriented in this scene at all.
Jack Brodke ..yes but there’s not really a possible way to keep a 180 degree rule in a 5 person dialogue scene where they’re sitting in a circle. you break it on scenes with multiple people dialogue so that you can have close ups on each group member. Find me a 4-5 person dialogue scene where they’re sitting in a circle, one close up on each member, and the 180 rule isn’t broken. lol
@@basketballj1000 what's the rule?
@@TheTonyEntertainment When shooting a scene you should draw a straight line through the area that you are shooting in. The camera can only stay on one side of that line because as soon as you cross it the direction everyone is looking flips and it becomes extremely disorienting for an audience to watch. If you physically move the camera to the other side of the line though it's okay. You just can't cut to the other side when your previous shot was on a certain side of the 180 line. Hope that makes sense.
The way that John Reid points at Freddy and says "And YOU" at 0:35 just makes me laugh for some reason.
If you tap it over and over it sounds like he’s saying “A JEW!!”
“And youuuu. At least you can talk!”
@@Ezio999Auditore But only ONE OF YOuu gets to stay on my aircraft!
Im still standing yeah yeah yeah
Now THIS is what excellent editing looks like.....
😂😂😂😂
This should be showed in film schools for how not to edit a scene, from now on
Which is exactly what my film school did in one of my editing master classes :)
@@albertlavinski797 And then you'll discover that professionals don't listen to whiners on CZcams.
@@albertlavinski797 Did they show them movies like Taken 3 or Paul WS Anderson movies which had one of the most atrocious editing in a movie of all time?
One of my film lecturers did exactly that.
But editing like this got them an Oscar, so......
The academy gave this the best editing because this film had 2 directors and a mess of a production, and the editor is basically the whole reason the producers could salvage something out of it.
Let's be real, the one scene that the Academy thinks is Best Film Editing worthy was just the Live Aid scene. They clearly overlooked this scene because how the Live Aid scene was competently made from every aspect
The editing here reminds me of the episodes of Power Rangers where they wanted to hide the fact that half the cast had walked off or that they were shooting episodes while in Australia. The latter, whenever one character in the Command Center started talking to Zordon, it was all ADR and the camera would show us a totally different ranger reacting.
The blocking and cinematography also did this scene no favors.
This scene was directed by Olivier Megaton.
@Jaden LaFrance lol we didn't know how good we had it with Tak3n
1:11 I just love how he is playing William Wilson in every movie he is in.
Mr. Mercury, I'm CIA
He wasn't alone.
@@jacksonlarson6099 *looks at his bandmates* Uh, you don't get to bring friends.
.....Queen?
Ladies and gents, I present you The oscar for best editing
0:42 Aidan Gillen
Among the supporting roles, I like the most.
There is a presence in acting.
0:59 Feelings are appearing in an instant, this face！Great.
"This is cinema" - Kevin Dunn
is that the infamous green screen scene from the room?
61 cuts in 1 Minute and 45 seconds, holy shit
Holy Christ, I don't think there were enough cuts in this minute and forty five second clip! There were parts where I almost realized which character was being shown, and who was talking to who... God damn, I'm surprised they didn't cut to birds flying by, or kids riding by on bikes. Also really glad we got that invaluable close up of the guy picking up the chair, important stuff to show us right there! I mean the audience clearly would think that this guy must have been magical, and floating in mid air if they didn't clearly establish and show us that he grabbed a chair to sit in! On a more serious note, glad to see all the comments calling out the editing, and comparing it to the fence jump scene in Taken 3.
It's so off putting to have a scene of people sitting around a table and talking edited like a Jason Bourne fight scene... and that's not even taking into account the awkward and confusing framing of the shots, and total lack of any sort of in camera continuity with the sense of space and direction. Guessing the people who decided this deserved the Oscar for Best Editing were on the same Crystal Meth that whoever edited this was on. Ill be right back, going to watch the clip again and count the cuts... 60 cuts! 60 fucking cuts in less than 2 minutes, with the longest single uncut shot lasting just under 9 seconds. Holy shit dude!
"...a scene of people sitting around a table and talking edited like a Jason Bourne fight scene..."
Not to mention the fact that both The Bourne Ultimatum and Bohemian Rhapsody won the Oscar for Best Film Editing.
« Best editing »
Forget the editing, the answer about what makes them different is pretty much the same thing all those other bands would say. Outsiders, playing for outsiders. Different. A family. All unique. Did the writer think this was profound or something?
Actually the writer thought he was taking directly from an actual Freddie interview. And it's not just about outsiders playing for outsiders. The point is even the band itself is made up of outsiders who have little in common.
@@TheaterPup Well I guess it's not that hard to believe they would really say that but it's pretty cliche
@@DysnomiaFilms It's something you can't avoid commenting on when discussing Queen. Their combination of personalities really shouldn't have worked, yet it did.
AND THE AWARD FOR BEST EDITING GOES TO…
Anything but this shitshow
Love ur vids keep on going
Hello dear
John Deacon is one of the luckiest men alive, he played for George Harrison and then Queen!
my god i thought it was just me when i watched this in theatre
1:03
And that’s what’s so powerful about it
Freddie Mercury: I'll tell you what it is. Our movie is still gonna win an Oscar for best editing despite looking like a cheap action movie.
John Reid:Well I'm sold.
0:09 How dare that person call Freddie Mercury a wanker!
Yeah my eyes are twitching out. Damn can't unsee this now.
I like how every comment is about the editing now
Academy award winner for film editing
Thank youu
My eyes hurt. This makes Taken 3 look like a breeze.
B E S T E D I T I N G
If this is best editing we should nominate Taken as well
Freddie Mercury? I'm music industry.
Its not even just the rapid editing, it's also that they use the worst possible times to rapid edit. "And you..." (Cut to Freddie) (cut to somebody else) "must be Freddie mercury" (cut back to him... after he finishes that line?).
Super video ! !!!continue 💓
I will :) Thanks for the comment!
This winning best editing is baffling me forever
this film won best editing at the oscars
0:18 "very subtle" said the actors when they saw the cuts in the movie
How did this movie win 'best editing'!? maybe if there was an Academy Award for most editing?
This has more cuts than an MCR concert in 2008.
that whole misfits quote makes me well up.
The more I watch it, the more funny it gets
This film won an oscar for best film editing. The lead also won an oscar fro best actor. Neither deserved to even be mentioned.
'You look like an angry lizard'
A cute angry lizard at that
Some premier editor smashed their head against their keyboard in a multicam and this is what they got
Hello dear
GO GET'EM LITTLEFINGER
Love that movie
That outfit Freddie Mercury has on was ridiculous
Mayor Carcetti vows to clean up the edits in his next campaign
From acting lord of the vale, to mayor of Baltimore, to record producer. Youve done well for yourself
"So this is Queen."
NO, ITS PATRICK
Wow. The snarky articles about the editing in this scene were not joking. Just, wow.
i just realised... thats aberama gold from peaky blinders
What bridge is that in the background ? Thank you.
They show Paul when he's silent but when he says "Pleasure," they hide his face. LMAO.
So this is plane, and you must be Bane
I never noticed how sliced up the scenes are until somebody pointed it out. Holy sh*t.
Angry lizard. I'm weak 😂.😭
Looking out doe the misfits who don't belong. We are family. Simply Poetic. 🍾🥂