He *SCHOOLED* Prime Federer and Nadal | Tennis' Craziest SHOWMAN!
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 03. 2024
- Hope you enjoy today's video! Don't forget to DROP A LIKE & Subscribe for more original Tennis content!
One of the most underrated players in Tennis history giving Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal a tennis lesson in one year!
One of the most brutal performances, and craziest comebacks in Tennis history! - Sport
Great guy to feature. Marcos was not only a good player he also had such a fun personality. Most of all he had this positive vibe & you can't help but root for him. Thanks Wivo this was a fun, enjoyable ride through memory lane.
What a great game from Marco! 🔥
That was some amazing serving by Marcos, especially in the 2nd match.
So true, i didnt even remember that he had such a good serve😅
My god, how many matches has federer choked from 40-15
I agree... underrated player. I was a fan of Baghdatis.....
LOL. Spring 2010 Federer was NOT Prime Federer. And this only loss that he had against Marcos went three very tight sets. After his AO win, he had a pretty abysmal spring and early summer season.
If you say so Federer stop winning majors after 2018
@@malcolmnorman5694 Just look at his record during 2010 and it tells the story, without being an a$$
@@senorgato70 I said what I said A whole most of the matches he choke 🤡
@@senorgato70 it's not like Federer played in a strong era anyway playing Agassi at 36 years old is a weak era but yet y'all criticize Djokovic who played fedal, Murray, and Stan not to mention del Potro Federer is a fraud and you know it he even choked against del Potro in that open final 2009 so stfu clown media was even calling Federer old at 27 go figure.💀
@@malcolmnorman5694everyone chokes lmao such a hater
There's no schooling Federer. I see a close match that was close because Marcos played well, which he obviously was capable of, and Roger making a large, and unusual, amount of unforced errors. Silliness.
Marcos very nearly won the AO losing to prime fed; miracle run will never forget; great personality was good for the sport!
Baggy was wonderful, I loved him. Such good energy on the court, made everyone smile and root for him. He may not have been able to best Roger & Rafa more than once or twice, but all those "weak era" a$sholes never saw him take Fed to task on multiple occasions. I dont know how often he met Nadal but as you see here he could get the better of him too. He was a beautiful player as well.
Always loved watching Bagpipes play even though he was a major cheat. I can't imagine how much he made betting against himself.
I would hardly call it schooling, if it is a close match.
Schooled is a bit of a stretch! Federer should have won that match! Against Nadal it was a bit more straightforward, the serve was nuts!
When federer is not prime
if he lost all the matches how can you call it 'schooling?'
Typical Fed, lost from 3 match points
Nadal and his non existent netgame.