Character Evidence During Trial -- Evidence at Trial

In this training video Dave Sugden discusses how to understand and apply the rules of character evidence during trial. The distinction between character evidence and habit evidence isn't always obvious. What is (inadmissible) character evidence for one judge might be (admissible) habit evidence for another. Mr. Sugden talks about this in detail, as well as the occasions wherein character evidence is allowed, namely - (1) when it is at issue, (2) when it is offered for "other purposes," (3) witness credibility. . . and much more!
Visit www.evidenceattrial.com/onlin... for more training videos and online courses.

[@MsSandy-nx5jz]

Thank you so much for taking the time to make these free videos. You are better than any law professor I have ever had.

[@evidenceattrial]

Wow, thanks!

[@blackwolfspace-cowboy121]

Great refresher even if you rely on CEC and CA cases.

[@evidenceattrial]

Thank you for the comment!

[@strategy36]

Again. I have to say you are a great teacher.

[@evidenceattrial]

Thanks you!!

[@LECityLECLEC]

I absolutely love your presentation style. God bless you thank you for sharing your knowledge! Jesus Christ is Lord

[@evidenceattrial]

Thank you so much!

[@salikmohammad9779]

Along with your other videos, this one too is worth watching. Regards

[@evidenceattrial]

Many thanks!

[@Stellar148]

Thank you very much for this great video! Even a second-grader can understand it.

[@evidenceattrial]

Glad it was helpful!

[@GeorgiyChipunov]

It’s still strang , very strange to me how when your a criminal defendant that’s poor and you don’t have ability to know that in some instances 404(b) has to be only used as rebuttal to if the defendant testifies. The prejudice and double jeopardy the US Attorney can inject is monsterious from priors and incidents, a lot of it never proven, it’s just mere thought opinions of those making the arrest.

[@GeorgiyChipunov]

The strange park is the logic is not logical to decide this issue