Bilbrand 3

[@andyoxleyonhistravels]

Excellent work. 30 seconds and they had 2 high pressure hosereels working. Very slick.

[@Utubin]

Heck Yeah.
Us here in the USA could learn a thing or 2 on how to put out a fire.
Great job.

[@GraemeMurphy]

Yup, seen more than a few of your firefighters standing around watching a fire spread before deciding to put some water on it.

[@FortAero]

Can't argue with that, Corey...

[@sugarbertie1143]

In the US the first engine to turn up would be an aerial ladder. I saw that once for a car fire. I thought WTF, are they crazy, the car wasn't on top of a building! For a modern country US firefighters are so clueless. Glad I don't live there.

[@knowledgeispowermediaprodu7094]

Absolutely outstanding work by the firefighters! You certainly knew what you were doing! Stay safe out there guys! Much love and respect from California, USA.

[@mylynne1953]

Amazing, engine pulls up and in less than 30 seconds they have two line running. Firemen get out of the truck suited up and ready. We could learn a lot from this. Our guys pull up and maybe in 3 or 4 minutes they have water pumping. MAYBE.

[@anthonywratten1235]

Exactly, when you see fire trucks in the USA they jump out have a chat maybe pull the lines fire up there pumps and by that time the fires are huge then they run out of water.

[@sugarbertie1143]

US firefighters just amaze me, they spend 20 minutes looking at the fire before they decide to put water on it. I think you're being optimistic with 3- 4 minutes. The building is usually destroyed before they think about tackling it and often turn up with the wrong type of appliance eg. A aerial ladder engine for a car fire? WTF?

[@Roofluffer]

@@sugarbertie1143 Ya get what you pay for. perhaps you should vote for that tax increase towards you local fire dept so they can train better, get new PROPER trucks etc or is that considered socialism now?

[@sugarbertie1143]

@@Roofluffer I don't live in the US, I live in the UK. It just beggars belief that they don't know how to fight a fire. Don't US fire engines have water , a pump, and hoses on board? In the UK as soon as somebody rings 999 (911 in the US) it goes to a central control, and they deploy the right appliance(s) depending on the type of fire, usually from the nearest or neighbouring fire stations. Response times are usually quick and the firemen are all 'suited and booted' as soon as they get off the engine. They then use on board hoses, water etc unless they need bigger kit than its all hooked up to the nearest hydrant. I think training is desperately needed in the US on how fires spread and how to put them out. I thought it would be common sense but in all the vids ive seen , US firefighters just don't have any urgency at all and appear to turn up with wrong equipment. Correct me if I'm wrong ?

[@biladcock9055]

Crosslay lines! The downfall of American firefighting.

[@ianleighton2232]

26 seconds to get water on the fire is amazing, well done guys a real credit!

[@peterharmsworth5246]

Wow Brilliant. I counted 20 seconds from fire truck coming to a stop, the first hose water hits the flames & in just another 10 seconds the second hose hits the flames. WELL DONE GUYS

[@sugarbertie1143]

That's normal for European and UK firefighters . We don't spend 20 minutes pulling hoses out we don't need and scratching our heads looking at it while the fire destroys everything.

[@apl175]

Fire truck came to a stop at 2:47 --- first water from the hose hit the fire at 3:10. Amazing.

[@Xanthopteryx]

Standard procedure here up i the Nordic countries. =)

[@bouffant-girl]

While the Company Officer was assessing the Situation, the Apparatus Operator was putting the Fire Pump into operation, while the remaining crew members were stretching and connecting a Supply Line from the Hydrant to The Engine; Donning SCBA Equipment, and stretching an 2 hose lines to begin Fire 🔥 Suppression. This Operation was perfectly executed by Professionals who knew exactly 💯 what they what was expected of them, and accomplished their tasks perfectly!

[@ingvarsvennberg435]

Great work. Fire men arrived with all personal equipment ready and put water on the fire after 20 sek. Great work.

[@dentonstales2778]

Brilliant job, superb use of hose reels, something American firefighters don't seem to know they have. In the USA so many departments would would arrive not fully dressed, get their gear on, spend a good 5 minutes pulling hundreds of feet of hose off the truck which they didn't need, as the engine sat there with unused hose reels on it. I've seen Dutch firefighters fight a fully involved house fire on the ground floor just using 4 hose reels from two engines, no need to go looking for hydrants or run out the large hoses. Hose reels are so underused in the USA.

[@sugarbertie1143]

Sorry to say it fella, What I've seen of US firefighters they haven't got a clue! A house would literally burn down before they decided to get some water on it. I've even seen them on top of a building poking a hole in the roof. The fire will spread straight away if they do that as it gives it air!! Who the f*ck trains these guys? Thank god I don't live in the US. They're bloody hopeless!!

[@0118uhauha]

Strange , America usually has far more advanced technique than Denmark. In one respect I am happy that Denmark is less developed than the US: We have one gun for a thousand citizens and obtaining a license is very difficult. In America I think it is five guns for each citizen including all mentally sick and children. Executions of entire school-classes including the teacher appears to be frequent in the US. I wouldn't send my child to school if I lived there.

[@OZ6YD]

@@0118uhauha I think you got something wrong here.... Sweden is always in front of develop techniques for fire compared to the rest of the world. When I became firefighter here in Denmark, we heard nothing else than we always learn from Sweden.

[@OZ6YD]

Well, that's the rule here in Denmark - you have to be prepared for the job from the moment you step out the firetruck. Everything you can prepare while you're driving to the target, you'll do that so you don't waste time from the beginning. The first seconds are the most important seconds if you have to rescue people from a house. There is no time to waste on things that could have been done prior to the task. You have to be so ready, that you can walk direct into a house in few seconds when you arrive.

[@dentonstales2778]

@@OZ6YD Excellent, that's the way to do it.

[@neinkalando2519]

This has been a very big problem with all newer model cars and suv's, a gas fitting on the fuel line fails or there is an electrical short

[@jackharper3190]

In Austria most fire departments are 100% volontees . The exeption are bigger cities and big factories with higher fire risk.
But even the volunteers are well trained and we'll equipped.
It is such a big difference to the US. A volunteer department often uses eaqupment from the 70th. The professional departments in the US appear to me just not as very motivated.

[@jackharper3190]

Just start with all these vintage fire trucks quite many Volunteer Fire Departments are still using today. Outdated Com equipment is a problem too.

[@dcurleyifa]

Well done, the American fire crews could learn a thing or two from you guys, 1st point, speed is of the essence don’t spend valuable minutes laying your hoses out prettily.

[@knowledgeispowermediaprodu7094]

Exactly, some of our firefighters are.poorly trained. But here's the thing, as a taxpayer, here in California, I wouldn't at all mind money being funded for training and equipment for volunteer fire departments as well as departments in a financially struggling town or rural area. I would rather have trillions spent on our fire departments rather than overseas.

[@raymondfunnel6856]

That was a quick response. Well done guys

[@gregbarrow4497]

Beautiful work guys, give yourselves a pat on the back!

[@UncleFred100]

Chief here…I agree with the comments! The house was very close up to going up, and they just attacked and saved it. Great job!!!👍😉

[@sugarbertie1143]

Good job it wasn't in the US. The house would have burnt down before they got water on the car fire. I never understand why there is no urgency at all with US firefighters. In Europe we have water on it within a couple of minutes of arriving. Isn't that the whole point of fighting a fire? Damage limitation?

[@lucanen4494]

Bravo aux pompiers. Heureusement que vous êtes la Respect .

[@markfowler6330]

A lot of the European fire trucks carry water. I think most of US fire trucks have to be connected to a hydrant. Correct me if l am wrong.

[@memer_gaming121]

you are indeed wrong. most US engines carry a 500+ gallon tank. the minimum to be classified as an engine is (I believe) 200 gallons.

[@biathlonfan]

super Einsatz, Kompliment

[@lorrylorry8867]

Kod nas u Hvatskoj i u Bosni i Hercgovini susjedi i komsije priskoce u pomoc i ugase vatru....

[@mer2705]

Not sure where this is, but it looks like a great place to call home from

[@henrikmodin4235]

Denmark

[@gunni5110]

So einen Spezialisten hatten wir auch schon vor dem Haus, das erste was er sagte wo krieg ich jetzt Wasser her ?

[@shockingguy]

Such a difference in technique and equipment, in the states here they would almost never have water touching the fire in 30 seconds

[@ginskimpivot753]

Ans here in the UK, I'd have dropped the camera and grabbed the garden hose.

[@timtim4603]

Problem is American fire fighters have to lay hoses then connect to supply or fire engine seems to take long time they do have deck guns but seem not to use them much European fire fighters use pressure hose reels direct from appliance much quicker to set up & run to hydrant if needed later on only my humble opinion❤️

[@memer_gaming121]

Hey there. Your typical ignorant American here. While pulling hose is slower than using a hose reel a well packed preconnect or bumper line should only take 20-30 seconds to deploy and only a few seconds to charge. and a deck gun is a mounted master stream which is (usually) only used for large fires like structures or semis. my department just got our first hose reel on an engine but we aren't supposed to use it for anything other than dumpster fires and decon. Not sure why but I'm pushing to make it acceptable to use on vehicles. as of now we cant.

[@michaelm1436]

Wow. As soon as they showed up, water on the way. In the US another 30 minutes.

[@Xanthopteryx]

Välkoordinerat, säkert och effektivt. Våra nordiska brandkårer verkar vara duktiga på sådant här. Var det en brandbekämpande enhet plus insatsledare?

[@axelnes]

Great Job!

[@moviemagg]

Very fast in getting water on this fire.

[@lotharkuhle3403]

So sieht effektive Brandbekämpfung aus . Sachlich, fachlich korrekt und effektiv. Die Drehleiterr Kaninchen Nachfolgern

[@whatyousaidbud]

I've not seen many firefighting vids from the US as alot of people on here seem to think this is amazing, but as a UK resident this seems pretty normal. My only concern would have been they didn't appear to identify the electricity box so close to the fire before blasting water at it but 🤷‍♂️ I wasn't there so I don't know!

[@SkibberDK]

You mean the electrical box 4 or 5 meters from the fire, that are not damaged at all?

[@florianix8272]

Do you mean the mailbox? Or the washing machine?

[@jesperhald3969]

@@florianix8272, to be fair, there is a electricity box and what appears to be a phone/internet-box 4-5 m. to the left of the burning car. But they don't seem to be affected by the fire.

[@Xanthopteryx]

The electricity box was several meters away, and they knew exactly where it was. The first responder had a Long time to assess the situation (maybe he was at home and it was closer than the station or the station was a part time station where everyone have to rush from their homes or work). Besides that, those boxes can tolerate a lot of water.

[@SimseFalk1819]

@@Xanthopteryx The first person was the chief, he drives himself when he is on shift. The engine was from the full-time station Vejle.

[@shauncorless8965]

Hurry up save the washing machine 😳at least they can put the bins back out 🥴

[@kristianpahus]

Ja. På Bakkekammen i bydelen Bredballe

[@winnin3499]

Kristian Pahus æ

[@perschimannhansen6683]

Du kan sgu da ikke passe at der ikke nogen, som har en vandslange i sådan et boligkvarter. Fandeme dårlig naboskab ikke at gøre noget.

[@Mollermand]

Er det i Vejle?

[@johnbmw316]

Anyway, why is an officer so much earlier on scène????

[@Magnus_Kieler]

@@johnbmw316 The (Brandinspektøren) fire inspector or fire officer drives a car (SUV) so he can get on site much faster than the firefighters in the fire trucks or he just happened to be closer.

[@ingridjaenicke8848]

Hat denn keiner von den Nachbarn einen Feuerlöscher?

[@0118uhauha]

Die waren wahrscheinlich nicht zu hause. Am Werktagen sind ganzen Villa-viertel in Dänemark oft leer.

[@DavidLangeYU91]

Bei dem Brandausmaß hätte ein Pulverlöscher oder CO2-Löscher nicht mehr viel gebracht. Ich bin, aber nicht dagegen es zu versuchen, jedoch muss man immer die Gefahr vor Hitze und Rauchgas abwägen

[@hanshustenbaer396]

War der bei der Feuerwehr oder Müllabfuhr. Ich dachte immer dass die in ihren Einsatz Autos so was wie Schaumlöscher haben, war wohl ein Irrtum von mir.

[@Sheppart92]

Die meisten Feuerwehrfahrzeuge haben Schaum an Bord ( entweder einen 120l Tank oder 3 bis 6 20l Kanister) aber für den erstangriff wird immer ein reiner wasserangriff geführt und Schaum in der Regel für Nachlöscharbeiten. Wenn man das am Anfang einsetzt zerstört das Feuer den Schaum.

[@sueder80]

@@Sheppart92 Glaube eher er meint den ersteintreffenden Kdow. Gehe davon aus der hätte in Deutshcland einen 6 Kilo Pulver Löscher an Bord.

[@Sheppart92]

Naja Pulverlöscher sind in der Regel das einzige was du in einem ELW oder KDOW finden wirst und der ersteintreffende Einsatzleiter fährt in der Regel vor um die Lage zu erkunden. Ich glaube die nehmen nur dann einen Pulverlöscher in die Hand wenn es ein ganz kleiner Brand wäre wo kein großer Aufwand nötig ist.

[@moparedtn]

Electric car? Those small explosions are worrisome...

[@sebastiangobbels1560]

No Electric car

[@flow066]

Seems to be the tires

[@markuss.1528]

1. tires, than maybe the Airbags

[@florianix8272]

This was definitely no electric car, they burn much different. The explosions (as stated before) were the tires, shock absorbers or airbags.

[@andyneipert2527]

Hard to tell wut tip of fire this is

[@stevebailey6403]

Watch & learn U S A .🤔

[@KM-qx6nh]

Yep......bet it was just another EV up in flames ! Thank goodness the fire department still uses diesel engines !

[@florianix8272]

This was no EV. EVs burn much different, just a regular Diesel or Gasoline. Electric cars and Gasoline/Diesel cars can both catch fire, but at least in an electric car it doesn't explode if the fuel tank ruptures.

[@wiesenbefeuchter]

Where ?

[@SimseFalk1819]

Close too Vejle

[@Biffo1262]

Big mistake by the mobile officer. Never get there before the first pump. The public expect you to work miracles all on your own.

[@duerdum9]

He is a chief for the whole section. His job is to evaluate the situation and give strategic guidance to the team leader. Him being there first is actually quite important, as he can prepare the team before they arrive.
Furthermore, in many areas in Denmark he has a one minute departure time whereas the firefighters have a five minute departure time.

[@roneagle8038]

@@duerdum9 I believe Mr. Booth was deploying sarcasm!

[@duerdum9]

@@roneagle8038 I don't. It is unfortunately not unheard of, that people expect the impossible.

[@mickstebbings1192]

Exactly what I was thinking
Officer should not get there before the pump He will be expected to do something
The OIC of the pump will do all the Dynamic Risk Assessment

[@jesperhald3969]

@@mickstebbings1192, I believe that he is doing something. If people doesn't get it, it is their problem. His main focus is on the fire, so he can transmit the situation to the crew of firefigthers on their way.

[@ericeric5903]

Attacking fire from wrong side … sits in smoke and suffocates … Brilliant! ….

[@florianix8272]

What? How is there a wrong side to that? They just immediately put water on it, and it went out!

[@dukeoflakeshore5805]

Der Rauch stieg doch senkrecht nach oben - schräg ging der Wasserdampf weg.

[@Cruiserman70]

Thats poor, the first arriving officer does no reconnaisance whats behind the car, if fire is catching the house. But, Most important, he removes the dustbins….

[@florianix8272]

Such a fire is very hot, I don't think he could've walked by the car. Also I'm pretty sure he saw, that the house was not on fire. He removed the dustbins so they wouldn't trouble them later (fall over etc).

[@jesperhald3969]

Well, You didn't see what he saw when he got out of the car, so you'll never know, do you?
He might have noticed, that there was no immediate danger to the house, and he then removed the bins to get them out of the way, because he had already determined where the fire truck should be placed. He's the man in charge, and are making the decisions beforehand, so that when the fire truck arrives, he and they already know what to do.
That's called " efficiency"

[@ianharvey3696]

Electric car??????????????????

[@mimilapetitesouris4361]

Les pompiers sont pas presses

[@timokuusela5794]

If it were a Tesla, the house would have burned down too... When they tried to put down a Tesla fire, 100000 litres (quarts) of water and foam was used, that is hundred cubic metres of water, a big swimming pool... Now here in Finland they have a water filled container to completely submerge electric cars when they start burning. Only way to extinquish them in a safe way, as they can start burning again any time later on.

[@jesperhald3969]

And so do we in Denmark.
But why mention Tesla? Why not just say "Any electric vehicle"?
By the way: I have been told, that the new Renault e-Megane Electric has a water connection connected direct to the batteries, so that the firemen can connect at fire hose and flood the battery.

[@lotharkuhle3403]

Kann ich nachfordern

[@robertbarrows8847]

Where was this taken??

[@neggym]

It is in Denmark.

[@SimseFalk1819]

Bredballe close too Vejle

[@tms372]

At least they saved the trash cans.

[@Utubin]

All but the last one as she got hot and lost her figure.

[@runeljungstrommer331]

batteribil?

[@duerdum9]

Tvivlsomt. Det ligner en Golf 5.

[@jesperhald3969]

Hvorfor tror alle, at når der er en bil der brænder, så må det være en elbil?!?
Der er, også forholdsmæssigt, markant flere fossilbiler der bryder i brand en rene elbiler.

[@whocares264]

So funny the fireman saved the bins, car is ok it will buff out...

[@leifvejby8023]

Car was a goner, but the bins could still be saved.

[@canevousregardepas6042]

​@@leifvejby8023
These trash cans should have been removed from the fire, before starting to film.
Priorities are wrong these days.

[@tomjohnson9730]

It wasn’t so much about saving the bins as making sure they were out of the way!

[@redningskretjerdk3045]

Hej

[@brandstationerogandet5782]

Der var du der igen

[@redningskretjerdk3045]

Ja😅 og hej

[@brandstationerogandet5782]

Og igen hey

[@redningskretjerdk3045]

@@brandstationerogandet5782 ja

[@markmajlath5166]

filming and not help.......

[@Christin5554]

hat aber ganz schön lange gedauert bis die Feuerwehr da war.

[@DavidLangeYU91]

Wenn das Video kurz nach der Alarmierung aufgenommen wurde, waren die eigentlich sehr schnell.

[@Christin5554]

@@DavidLangeYU91 also ich fand es sehr lang.

[@DavidLangeYU91]

@@Christin5554 Feuerwehrfahrzeuge können halt nicht fliegen. :D
Bin immer noch der Meinung, dass sie recht schnell da waren, kommt ja immer auf die Einsatzstelle drauf an und die Entfernung zur Feuerwache/Gerätehaus.

[@florianix8272]

Nach videostart war nach einer Minute der KDoW da und der Rest nach drei Minuten. Durchschnitt in vielen Feuerwachen in Deutschland ist 4 Minuten oder so.

[@dukeoflakeshore5805]

Dauerte sehr lange, bis Feuerwehr da war! Und dann kein Schaumeinsatz, keine Löschdecke - schwach!

[@florianix8272]

Nach videostart war nach einer Minute der KDoW da und der Rest nach drei Minuten. Durchschnitt in vielen Feuerwachen in Deutschland ist 4 Minuten oder so. Schaum wurde nicht verwendet, weil er (anscheinend) durch das Feuer zerstört wird und warum sollte man eine Löschdecke für sowas verwenden? Bin kein Feuerwehrler aber soweit kenn ich mich mit der Materie aus...

[@dukeoflakeshore5805]

@@florianix8272 Weil das viel schneller geht, weniger Grundwasser verschmutzt wird und ein Überspringen auf das Haus unmöglich wird.

[@thomaskummer8784]

The garbage is save. xD

[@charlesallen8901]

Ii guess it just a fun vedio everyone stands there talking.