In my 20's I was a fairly successful rapper and producer that was on tour a few decent times. Every show I did these mics were all over the place. Not only the mics that were labeled and ready for us..but the mics that were just laying about on the ground and all over the place. I imagine this is the reason the "mic drop" lives on to this day. Because these things get dropped and tossed about and STILL function as a professional level mic. After all these years I finally put one in my home studio to use with my MPC for sampling vocals. Incredible mic.
I grabbed a Lewitt 240 pro and the Shure beta 57a, both are absolutely fantastic mics. Very inexpensive mics, with top quality sound and build. Great review btw.
SM58's which were made between 1966 and 1984 were dual impedance 50/150 ohm, something I only learned of recently. After that date they were single 150 ohm impedance to comply more with industry standards for sound equipment. I still have my old dual impedance mic which is well battered as it spent many years out on the road in my mobile disco days. I haven't used it for years as moving into club and radio work meant that all the sound gear was provided so the mic was 'retired' a long time ago. Very recently however we needed an extra radio studio mic as our trusty (SM58!) guest mic was needed for an outside broadcast. I duly dug out my old mic, was horrified to see the state of the grille and foam insert which had somewhat perished/tarnished over the years. I only noticed then as I was fitting a shiny new grille that it was marked as dual impedance. I noticed then that the sound level through the studio mixer was somewhat lower than our guest mic, which is probably the result of the impedance mismatch. There is no switching for the different impedances, apparently it is taken care of by the way in which the mic XLR connector is wired internally. Apparently one of the wires has to be either disconnected or swapped, I'm not sure which, in order to eliminate the 50 ohm option. I've hunted high and low for some sort of instruction for doing this but can't find details anywhere. Is it something your mic experts at PMT would be aware of? I live not far from the Romford store, would it be worth me popping in to have a chat?
I love this microphone. Last year I worked for a pro indoor lacrosse (NLL) team as their public address announcer, and the microphone that the arena supplies is an SM58S. It was absolutely perfect and my voice sounds better thru that microphone than any other one I've used before. I've now bought my own SM58S to use when announcing hockey games from various leagues, from youth hockey tournaments to the USHL and NCAA D3
I have had my SM58 for about 10 years now. I have used many different clones of this mike over the years. While some are fairly close I don't have any that really compare to my SM58.
With a few exceptions like a kick drum, 57s and 58s are the only mics you need for a live show. I know some will argue with me on this point but the history and reliability of these mics simply cannot be argued.
I just bought a 57 with its official wind shield. I love it for my video podcast. The mat black looks great on camera and the sound it perfect for my untreated room.
Just got my first professional microphone ever! Very excited to try it out, although I figured out that the music store forgot to give me the sound amplifier which I paid for. 😃
I just ordered this microphone. So it's good to hear such positive things about it. I'm surprised it's been around for so long. When I ordered this (to replace my audio-technica AT2005), I was thinking it was something new. I just hope this works on my computer with my XRL-to-USB cable I bought. Or I'm gonna feel like crying.
@@actioncameraspro @Action Cameras pro Hi! Sadly, it DIDN'T work with the XRL-to-USB cable (on my PC or my laptop). I could hear my voice in the recording, but it was barely picking up, even with the volume all the way up on Audacity. Sounded terrible, and also had a hissing sound. SO....I ordered a Focusrite Scarlett Solo Audio Interface. With this (and an XRL Male to XRL Female cable I ordered separately), I was finally able to get my microphone to sound good on my PC. But it took some experimenting and I had to manually download the Focusrite Control etc. before it would work. I haven't tried doing any singing with it yet. But I'm sure it'll sound good when I do. 😀
@@actioncameraspro Yeah, I spent around 110 USD for this. I was going to get the dual one that could have 2 mics plugged in, but I didn't really need that one. Plus it was 40 or 50 dollars higher. This was the first (and only) audio interface I knew about at the time, which I saw in a CZcams video. So I just went with that one.
I LOVED SHURE ANY OF THEM BUT SHURE, BUT WHEN I SANG THEY THOUGHT IT CAME FROM THE CD, YOU DON'T NEED TO HIGH YOUR VOICE, AND AFFORDABLE IT WON'T LET YOU DOWN, HIGH QUALITY PERFORMANCE IS PHENOMENAL.
I use it in its budget alternatives for making 90s style hip hop. It just gives that feel that that style of music needs. A lot of people like to emulate the 90s style but they use really clean modern equipment and software and wonder why their music doesn't sound like it's from the 90's
I’m thinking of picking up one specifically for making 90’s style hip hop. I’d like to capture that sound as close as I can without time traveling back and recording you know? So seeing your comment is definitely nice and reassuring.
I have used many broadcast mics since the 1960s and listened to a lot of live material where the vocal mics are SM58s. I think engineers need to be care using the SM58 and similar microphones. I swear the SM58, with it's relatively high output, can overdrive (most likely) the first preamp stage enough that the midrange sounds a bit torn. I've hear other types of mic in the same gig that (for whatever reason) deliver cleaner vocals. It's almost as if the preamp can't handle the combination of loud rock & roll singing and the the mic's output characteristics. Anyone else encountered this?
Excuse me, mate! I'm a teacher of foreign languages and a big fan of languages and dialects. Firstly, your review is really cool! Secondly, you're British - I guess - but from which city?
Here’s a little red pill of truth that a lot of guys don’t want to swallow. The Shure SM58 frequency response follows the same EQ profile that an audio engineer would dial in for human voice on a flat response condenser. Meaning, the SM58 is already ideal for human voice spoken or singing right out of the box! Another little red pill is that the “SM” stands for Studio Microphone. So the claim that it was originally designed for live stage vocals is a myth. It was originally designed for radio and TV. The music industry realized how ideal it was for live vocals so it became ubiquitous for that. But it’s ideal for voiceovers and general studio recordings (including instruments). In fact, I’ll toss you a 3rd red pill. According to Shure, the SM57 and SM58 are the same mic except for the grille on the end. The 58 has a pop filter in a mesh ball and the 57 does not. The pop filter affects the frequency response SLIGHTLY, but they are the same mic…according to Shure.
Just a minor correction. Steel is rarely if ever die cast outside of some esoteric ultra expensive application due to the high temperature and atmosphere that would be required, not to mention a die that could handle it. It would definitely not be done for a stage microphone. The main housing of the SM58 is made from die cast zinc, you can test it as steel is magnetic and zinc is not. The head basket is steel with I believe a nickel plating. I’ve used 100s of microphones to make recordings. If you can’t make a good recording using this microphone (SM58), it is 1. Inappropriate for the application, 2. You are incompetent, ignorant or both!
My question is why isn't the PG58 more popular? More handling noise, sure, but there's a power switch, and the response curve is flatter. Looks exactly the same as an SM58 too, same company, same quality, but slightly cheaper if I remember correctly. When I first got a studio put together a couple years ago, that was my only mic. I recorded Stairway with it on every instrument and the vocals, and it came out absolutely heavenly. No pun intended.
Hello, I wanted to ask a question that I have wanted to ask for a long time: I have the sm58 microphone that I bought about a year ago. The whole time I use it, I have 3 problems. 1. The volume is very low even when I'm close to the microphone. 2. When I speak, a weak "white noise" starts playing in the background, which is only disturbing when speaking. 3. Even if I connect it to phantom 48v still remains the same. Do you know what to do in such a situation? I would be happy to answer if you can.🙏 Thank you in advance.
How loud can it get? I realize in the studios Im not singing loud enough and my voice is getting drowned out by the live instruments. Can it amplify your voice to be audible enough over instruments?
Thanks for this great video! Two little questions: Is it possible to connect the SM58 with a pc with a xlr to 3.5 cable and record some things with for example audacity? And does anyone know if the "head" of the beta (what is it called? Capsule? Mean the round metal thing) would fit also on the sm58? I like the blue stripe, but would prefer the sound of the sm58 I guess... ;-)
Better late than never.. 1) It is possible but not recommended. AFAIK the audio level would be so low it'd be rather unusable. If you ask me there are two ways to go: 1) Buy a USB microphone such as the Audio Technica AT2020, it's a condenser mic though so it won't have the same characteristics as these dynamic mics do. You don't need to buy anything extra with this microphone as it even comes with a small stand. 2) Shure SM58 with a complete setup (Microphone, pop-filter (Shure A58WS), microphone stand, cables, preamp, audio interface and highly recommended if you do any live streaming: Mic processor such as the DBX 286s. It's expensive if you want a complete setup but it's worth it if you like good sound. As for the question about the grill I can only speculate. Just looking at the picture of the grilles (Shure RK 143 G (SM58) vs Shure RK323G Beta 58 Black (Beta 58)) it seems to fit and have the same dimensions. Also the fact that Thomann sells a replacement grill (the t.bone SM58 Replacement Screen Silver) that fits both tell me that it will work.
sir i want to do voice over I want professional quality. But my room is not sound proof. I want to record poetry. Whose emotional low voice and high voice have to be recorded. Which audio interface and microphone would be best for me? My budget total is $400. In which the complete studio setup is done. i have laptop
It's funny, to my ears both sound like £20 gaming headset mics would if they had higher clarity and no noise cancellation, or most under £50 condensers but without noise. I've never liked the sound these mics produce and avoid them like the plague. If only there were more mics with the 58's specialties! I cringe whenever I see them used in high budget productions. For studio environments there are better mics for second hand you can have for cheaper, but favourites will be favourites. That, and the fact that they're often paired with awful outdoor 'that'll do' boxes and mixed in a way they sound a bit... off.
After having studied audio for 20 years. The SM58 is nasally funky piece of garbage like all handheld stage dynamic mics. The 5kHz peak on these things are a bad tuning and they should be able to make a better tuning by now. SM7b is too dark and still retains the 6khz lump from SM57.
In my 20's I was a fairly successful rapper and producer that was on tour a few decent times. Every show I did these mics were all over the place. Not only the mics that were labeled and ready for us..but the mics that were just laying about on the ground and all over the place. I imagine this is the reason the "mic drop" lives on to this day. Because these things get dropped and tossed about and STILL function as a professional level mic. After all these years I finally put one in my home studio to use with my MPC for sampling vocals. Incredible mic.
I grabbed a Lewitt 240 pro and the Shure beta 57a, both are absolutely fantastic mics. Very inexpensive mics, with top quality sound and build. Great review btw.
Yup, love my Beta 87, but my Beta 58 has been with me for at least 25 years. Tried and true, Shure, a company you can rely on!
SM58's which were made between 1966 and 1984 were dual impedance 50/150 ohm, something I only learned of recently. After that date they were single 150 ohm impedance to comply more with industry standards for sound equipment. I still have my old dual impedance mic which is well battered as it spent many years out on the road in my mobile disco days. I haven't used it for years as moving into club and radio work meant that all the sound gear was provided so the mic was 'retired' a long time ago.
Very recently however we needed an extra radio studio mic as our trusty (SM58!) guest mic was needed for an outside broadcast. I duly dug out my old mic, was horrified to see the state of the grille and foam insert which had somewhat perished/tarnished over the years. I only noticed then as I was fitting a shiny new grille that it was marked as dual impedance. I noticed then that the sound level through the studio mixer was somewhat lower than our guest mic, which is probably the result of the impedance mismatch.
There is no switching for the different impedances, apparently it is taken care of by the way in which the mic XLR connector is wired internally. Apparently one of the wires has to be either disconnected or swapped, I'm not sure which, in order to eliminate the 50 ohm option. I've hunted high and low for some sort of instruction for doing this but can't find details anywhere. Is it something your mic experts at PMT would be aware of? I live not far from the Romford store, would it be worth me popping in to have a chat?
I love this microphone. Last year I worked for a pro indoor lacrosse (NLL) team as their public address announcer, and the microphone that the arena supplies is an SM58S. It was absolutely perfect and my voice sounds better thru that microphone than any other one I've used before. I've now bought my own SM58S to use when announcing hockey games from various leagues, from youth hockey tournaments to the USHL and NCAA D3
Just bought one today and it's fantastic
I have had my SM58 for about 10 years now. I have used many different clones of this mike over the years. While some are fairly close I don't have any that really compare to my SM58.
Try Mojave MA D dynamic mic.
I'm not Shure!
But it Shure is.
@@andhewonders lol!
😅🔥
:)))
😂
Update to a more professional studio microphone you say. This is the standard upon which others came and it stands its ground. That's why I love it.
I was trying to find the best vocal mic and this review was great!
With a few exceptions like a kick drum, 57s and 58s are the only mics you need for a live show. I know some will argue with me on this point but the history and reliability of these mics simply cannot be argued.
You haven't lived until you step up to an sm58 in a full venue with bad wiring. It's a shocking experience.
I still use the shure 565, and have done since the 70s, still perfect sound
As an owner of a Shure SM57 and an SM7B, I can say that Shure really makes good microphones!
I have yet to try the 58 tho
I just bought a 57 with its official wind shield. I love it for my video podcast. The mat black looks great on camera and the sound it perfect for my untreated room.
Just got my first professional microphone ever! Very excited to try it out, although I figured out that the music store forgot to give me the sound amplifier which I paid for. 😃
Thank you for this info. Great stuff.
I just ordered this microphone. So it's good to hear such positive things about it. I'm surprised it's been around for so long. When I ordered this (to replace my audio-technica AT2005), I was thinking it was something new. I just hope this works on my computer with my XRL-to-USB cable I bought. Or I'm gonna feel like crying.
Does it work?
@@actioncameraspro @Action Cameras pro Hi! Sadly, it DIDN'T work with the XRL-to-USB cable (on my PC or my laptop). I could hear my voice in the recording, but it was barely picking up, even with the volume all the way up on Audacity. Sounded terrible, and also had a hissing sound.
SO....I ordered a Focusrite Scarlett Solo Audio Interface. With this (and an XRL Male to XRL Female cable I ordered separately), I was finally able to get my microphone to sound good on my PC. But it took some experimenting and I had to manually download the Focusrite Control etc. before it would work. I haven't tried doing any singing with it yet. But I'm sure it'll sound good when I do. 😀
@@jaym5118 oh sht this scarlet mixer is like 120 euro, why did u go with the so expensive you coul probably work out with 40 euro mixer
@@actioncameraspro Yeah, I spent around 110 USD for this. I was going to get the dual one that could have 2 mics plugged in, but I didn't really need that one. Plus it was 40 or 50 dollars higher. This was the first (and only) audio interface I knew about at the time, which I saw in a CZcams video. So I just went with that one.
@@jaym5118 yeah i need something for beatbox at home for like under 150 euro will search more, thank you !
For recording, I actually prefer the 58 over the 57. I use 58s on the toms of my drum kit.
I LOVED SHURE ANY OF THEM BUT SHURE, BUT WHEN I SANG THEY THOUGHT IT CAME FROM THE CD, YOU DON'T NEED TO HIGH YOUR VOICE, AND AFFORDABLE IT WON'T LET YOU DOWN, HIGH QUALITY PERFORMANCE IS PHENOMENAL.
I use it in its budget alternatives for making 90s style hip hop. It just gives that feel that that style of music needs. A lot of people like to emulate the 90s style but they use really clean modern equipment and software and wonder why their music doesn't sound like it's from the 90's
I’m thinking of picking up one specifically for making 90’s style hip hop. I’d like to capture that sound as close as I can without time traveling back and recording you know? So seeing your comment is definitely nice and reassuring.
I’m looking for a mic for rapping not necessarily 90s style but this comment has sealed the deal for me I think
Good explanation!
Thanks!
I have used many broadcast mics since the 1960s and listened to a lot of live material where the vocal mics are SM58s. I think engineers need to be care using the SM58 and similar microphones. I swear the SM58, with it's relatively high output, can overdrive (most likely) the first preamp stage enough that the midrange sounds a bit torn. I've hear other types of mic in the same gig that (for whatever reason) deliver cleaner vocals. It's almost as if the preamp can't handle the combination of loud rock & roll singing and the the mic's output characteristics. Anyone else encountered this?
Yes, and will use a PAD to cut 10 or 20 dB in front of the preamp. The 58 isn’t as sensitive as newer designs employing Neodymium magnets.
Excuse me, mate! I'm a teacher of foreign languages and a big fan of languages and dialects. Firstly, your review is really cool! Secondly, you're British - I guess - but from which city?
Here’s a little red pill of truth that a lot of guys don’t want to swallow. The Shure SM58 frequency response follows the same EQ profile that an audio engineer would dial in for human voice on a flat response condenser. Meaning, the SM58 is already ideal for human voice spoken or singing right out of the box!
Another little red pill is that the “SM” stands for Studio Microphone. So the claim that it was originally designed for live stage vocals is a myth. It was originally designed for radio and TV. The music industry realized how ideal it was for live vocals so it became ubiquitous for that. But it’s ideal for voiceovers and general studio recordings (including instruments). In fact, I’ll toss you a 3rd red pill. According to Shure, the SM57 and SM58 are the same mic except for the grille on the end. The 58 has a pop filter in a mesh ball and the 57 does not. The pop filter affects the frequency response SLIGHTLY, but they are the same mic…according to Shure.
Shure I'll buy one
Just a minor correction. Steel is rarely if ever die cast outside of some esoteric ultra expensive application due to the high temperature and atmosphere that would be required, not to mention a die that could handle it. It would definitely not be done for a stage microphone. The main housing of the SM58 is made from die cast zinc, you can test it as steel is magnetic and zinc is not. The head basket is steel with I believe a nickel plating. I’ve used 100s of microphones to make recordings. If you can’t make a good recording using this microphone (SM58), it is 1. Inappropriate for the application, 2. You are incompetent, ignorant or both!
Great comment. Probably about the only intelligent one on this vid.
There are two SM58 days. America has May 8th and the UK has 5th August.
My question is why isn't the PG58 more popular? More handling noise, sure, but there's a power switch, and the response curve is flatter. Looks exactly the same as an SM58 too, same company, same quality, but slightly cheaper if I remember correctly. When I first got a studio put together a couple years ago, that was my only mic. I recorded Stairway with it on every instrument and the vocals, and it came out absolutely heavenly. No pun intended.
Check out the samson Q8. Half the price for the same mic.
You can get the SM58 with a on/off switch too
The SM58 is much more well built than the cheaper version.
@@fixedfocusmediaofficial I have both, and no it isn’t.
@@CraigFlowersMusic Internal and external durability are two different things.
They're tuff.
You could build a house with one of these. Only ever need to replaced when lost.
great review it makes me want to go buy one.
Enjoyed this 👌
Simple its a legand! Tough rugged sounds nice the noise is not from the mic itself its from noisey preamps
Hello, I wanted to ask a question that I have wanted to ask for a long time:
I have the sm58 microphone that I bought about a year ago.
The whole time I use it, I have 3 problems.
1. The volume is very low even when I'm close to the microphone.
2. When I speak, a weak "white noise" starts playing in the background, which is only disturbing when speaking.
3. Even if I connect it to phantom 48v still remains the same.
Do you know what to do in such a situation?
I would be happy to answer if you can.🙏
Thank you in advance.
It may be an mixer issue, try another mixer.
Couldn’t agree more… bought one in 2005 for about £60… completely beat up, but works perfectly.
Hi, what stand or boom arm would you recommend for the SM58?
Thank you
How loud can it get? I realize in the studios Im not singing loud enough and my voice is getting drowned out by the live instruments. Can it amplify your voice to be audible enough over instruments?
Instruments should sound at lower volume.
Galaxy Attack game music 🔥🔥
Thank you for this video. I'm on the hunt for the perfect mic & I think I just found it.
Samson Q8.
Great video
Is this mic wireless or wired?
Original shure sm 58 which country
Can I use the mic for podcast?
where switch on off at mic?
Thanks for this great video!
Two little questions: Is it possible to connect the SM58 with a pc with a xlr to 3.5 cable and record some things with for example audacity?
And does anyone know if the "head" of the beta (what is it called? Capsule? Mean the round metal thing) would fit also on the sm58? I like the blue stripe, but would prefer the sound of the sm58 I guess... ;-)
Better late than never.. 1) It is possible but not recommended. AFAIK the audio level would be so low it'd be rather unusable. If you ask me there are two ways to go: 1) Buy a USB microphone such as the Audio Technica AT2020, it's a condenser mic though so it won't have the same characteristics as these dynamic mics do. You don't need to buy anything extra with this microphone as it even comes with a small stand. 2) Shure SM58 with a complete setup (Microphone, pop-filter (Shure A58WS), microphone stand, cables, preamp, audio interface and highly recommended if you do any live streaming: Mic processor such as the DBX 286s.
It's expensive if you want a complete setup but it's worth it if you like good sound.
As for the question about the grill I can only speculate. Just looking at the picture of the grilles (Shure RK 143 G (SM58) vs Shure RK323G Beta 58 Black (Beta 58)) it seems to fit and have the same dimensions. Also the fact that Thomann sells a replacement grill (the t.bone SM58 Replacement Screen Silver) that fits both tell me that it will work.
I have a couple of knock offs I use for home karaoke.
There wouldn't be Volvos or Ferraris without the Ford Model-T, but no one says "everyone should own" the latter.
Mojave MA D is best budget dm.
How do you connect the microphone?
sir i want to do voice over I want professional quality. But my room is not sound proof. I want to record poetry. Whose emotional low voice and high voice have to be recorded. Which audio interface and microphone would be best for me? My budget total is $400. In which the complete studio setup is done. i have laptop
Sam looking the part 🧔♂
Why? Because it's a workhorse as well as super-reliable...
I have a knock off.
It's funny, to my ears both sound like £20 gaming headset mics would if they had higher clarity and no noise cancellation, or most under £50 condensers but without noise. I've never liked the sound these mics produce and avoid them like the plague. If only there were more mics with the 58's specialties! I cringe whenever I see them used in high budget productions. For studio environments there are better mics for second hand you can have for cheaper, but favourites will be favourites. That, and the fact that they're often paired with awful outdoor 'that'll do' boxes and mixed in a way they sound a bit... off.
bad take man
Not a fan of people talking over music
After having studied audio for 20 years. The SM58 is nasally funky piece of garbage like all handheld stage dynamic mics. The 5kHz peak on these things are a bad tuning and they should be able to make a better tuning by now. SM7b is too dark and still retains the 6khz lump from SM57.
😂😂😂
Hsiwosozoos dbsksoowos ebeiosooow d sjskososod shsjksks
Чушь