As Ronny says what happens to guys that need a 4x4, will the government go pave all the roads in Australia in the outback so you can drive a normal car? Crazy. Some places just simply are not accessible without 4x4
Russia people! That’s who Australia aligns with in terms of the few remaining counties without vehicle efficiency standards! When you buy anything you look at how energy efficient it is. Why should cars be any different? If you want to buy a big car then make it better. Seems pretty sensible to me. Why you’d want a vehicle which uses more fuel and causes greater pollution than it needs to is beyond comprehension. Let’s not succumb to scare campaigns. This is hardly a radical proposal.
it sucks that the manufacturers are gonna pass the costs down to the consumer.. however, people are already paying $80,000-$120,000 for dual cabs and large SUVs. This efficiency tax won't do much to slow the demand
@@JimBob-vb8oz explain why th 2.8 troopy is $4k cheaper than the V8TBD despite being better in every performance metric including fuel efficiency and emissions?
If people can stomp up $60-$70k for a Dual Cab Ute, a lot of people are paying even more and then are head over to ARB or TJM for their thousands of dollars of upgrades, then they shouldn't really care too much about forking out another $4-$5K for the RRP for the Ute, should they? That's something to think about .... NVES is designed to get manufactures to bring in more fuel efficient vehicles, whether it's in ICE, EV, Hybrid or PHEV form. It's becoming increasingly clear that EV's should not be the only type of vehicle to be considered for our unique situation, a big country with vast area's to travel. Again, you only have to look at other counties that already have and have had fuel emission standards for years, like the USA and Canada, which is why Australia is modelling our standards to those of the USA standards and let's not forget what vehicles are the biggest selling vehicles in those two countries!! Yep, the Ford F Series, Chevrolet Silverado and RAM 1500! But how can that be when they have fuel emission standards?? Right?? So we can have fuel emission standards and still buy Utes in their thousands!
A couple of thoughts 1. If this tax is introduced don’t buy new vehicles 2. The only effect will be is everything will become more expensive 3. STOP VOTING ONLY LIBERAL OR LABOUR
Without Falcons and commodores, more families use dual cabs as well. Engines are also less reliable with the newer emission control devices. Electric vehicles are a false alternative. What are people supposed to drive?
It’s asinine a country as vast as Australia with huge distances between population centers is held to the same emissions standards as Europe comprising geographically small countries with dense populations. The government should abandon net zero and apply a reasonable offset to account for Australias unique, remote challenges with the proviso of adopting cleaner solutions as technology improves over time.
Just another revenue raiser. How will it actually cut emissions? People who need or want a 4x4 have one for a reason, it isn’t magically going to change anything. Just 🐂 💩 ‘look what we are doing to improve emissions’ when it will make little difference. Not like you can use a Suzuki swift for tradie work or enjoyable camping with a family.
As Ronny says what happens to guys that need a 4x4, will the government go pave all the roads in Australia in the outback so you can drive a normal car? Crazy. Some places just simply are not accessible without 4x4
Especially in Australia
Revenue raising. They see utes becoming more popular.
Russia people! That’s who Australia aligns with in terms of the few remaining counties without vehicle efficiency standards! When you buy anything you look at how energy efficient it is. Why should cars be any different? If you want to buy a big car then make it better. Seems pretty sensible to me. Why you’d want a vehicle which uses more fuel and causes greater pollution than it needs to is beyond comprehension. Let’s not succumb to scare campaigns. This is hardly a radical proposal.
it sucks that the manufacturers are gonna pass the costs down to the consumer.. however, people are already paying $80,000-$120,000 for dual cabs and large SUVs. This efficiency tax won't do much to slow the demand
Will be interesting
Where else could it go? The manufacturers can’t absorb it.
@@clives681 they could instead build more efficient vehicles that meet the standards.. but they won't, they'll just pass on the costs
@@o0bananaman0omaking a more efficient car takes R&D money. Who’s going to pay for that? Magic money tree? Costs always get passed onto consumers
@@JimBob-vb8oz explain why th 2.8 troopy is $4k cheaper than the V8TBD despite being better in every performance metric including fuel efficiency and emissions?
NEW TAX from Airbus Albo
I heard an American senator say that to charge an electric car is the same as running 17 house fridge's
That seems wild
Old mate Casanova Bowen is on a slippery slope with this one, just like his offshore wind turbines...
Here in Tassie the rego on a 4x4 Ute is about $200 dearer than a 4x4 SUV. Now go figger how they came up with that!!
Really??...
It's classed as a commercial vehicle. Same as vans. They've always been more expensive in qld too
If people can stomp up $60-$70k for a Dual Cab Ute, a lot of people are paying even more and then are head over to ARB or TJM for their thousands of dollars of upgrades, then they shouldn't really care too much about forking out another $4-$5K for the RRP for the Ute, should they? That's something to think about ....
NVES is designed to get manufactures to bring in more fuel efficient vehicles, whether it's in ICE, EV, Hybrid or PHEV form. It's becoming increasingly clear that EV's should not be the only type of vehicle to be considered for our unique situation, a big country with vast area's to travel. Again, you only have to look at other counties that already have and have had fuel emission standards for years, like the USA and Canada, which is why Australia is modelling our standards to those of the USA standards and let's not forget what vehicles are the biggest selling vehicles in those two countries!! Yep, the Ford F Series, Chevrolet Silverado and RAM 1500! But how can that be when they have fuel emission standards?? Right?? So we can have fuel emission standards and still buy Utes in their thousands!
Can we talk about how much emissions china puts out with our coal we sell to them vs how many V8 79’s it would take equal their emissions.
I strongly suggest you go watch John Cardogan !
Have to check him out
@@BackChat he’s honest , blunt, but straight up and to the point and extremely knowledgeable .
A couple of thoughts
1. If this tax is introduced don’t buy new vehicles
2. The only effect will be is everything will become more expensive
3. STOP VOTING ONLY LIBERAL OR LABOUR
But it’s voting for minor parties that put these current muppets into government
ALL HAIL RONNY DAHL!!!!!
😂😂
It's sad that they constantly publicly express targeting the everyday consumer and not something like large trucking companies for instance.
Without Falcons and commodores, more families use dual cabs as well. Engines are also less reliable with the newer emission control devices. Electric vehicles are a false alternative. What are people supposed to drive?
Its literally just another tax, that they pulled out of thin air (or "CO2"😂)
Is this a reupload I swear I watched this not long ago
There was an issue with the first one 😂
Lol our kast Government bought this in in NZ but our new Government either has or us getting rid of it.
It’s asinine a country as vast as Australia with huge distances between population centers is held to the same emissions standards as Europe comprising geographically small countries with dense populations. The government should abandon net zero and apply a reasonable offset to account for Australias unique, remote challenges with the proviso of adopting cleaner solutions as technology improves over time.
My employer pays for carbon credits on my ute, why should I have to pay a carbon tax.
Just another revenue raiser. How will it actually cut emissions? People who need or want a 4x4 have one for a reason, it isn’t magically going to change anything. Just 🐂 💩 ‘look what we are doing to improve emissions’ when it will make little difference. Not like you can use a Suzuki swift for tradie work or enjoyable camping with a family.
all due respect you have to get political the labor party will destroy 4wd industry
It was our labour party in NZ that tried this in NZ.
Carbon tax by another means.
you have to be political the labor party will destroy the 4wd industry
Remember to vote for a libertarian party, it will help