Canon RF-S 10-18mm vs 18-45mm Kit Lens | Is It Worth The Upgrade?

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 4. 08. 2024
  • Is the Canon RF-S 10-18mm IS STM worth buying to upgrade from the 18-45mm kit lens? In this video I compare the two and find out!
    Grab my new ESSENTIALS Lightroom Preset Pack! 📷 foxtailshop.com/products/esse...
    RF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM👇
    geni.us/uzxr44B
    RF-S 10-18mm vs EF-S 10-18mm Lens: • Canon RF-S 10-18mm vs ...
    Get the R50 here👇
    geni.us/4LRU
    My other channel: / @foxtailwhipz
    Get Great Deals On Used Camera Gear at KEH! www.shareasale.com/u.cfm?d=60...
    Get TubeBuddy To Grow Your Channel: www.tubebuddy.com/FOXTAILWHIPZ
    Instagram: @adamharig_
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    For sponsorship, product reviews, and collaboration, you can email me here: foxtailwhipz@gmail.com
    Gear I Recommend:
    Cameras Under $100: • 5 Awesome Cameras Unde...
    Cameras Under $500: • 5 Amazing Cameras For ...
    Cinema Cameras Under $500: • Best Budget Cinema Cam...
    Cinema Cameras Under $1000: • Best Budget Cinema Cam...
    Favorite Budget Camera: amzn.to/3OpWFbD
    Favorite Budget Lens: amzn.to/43VtFOP
    Great Wireless Mic: amzn.to/3KuaZPl
    Do-It-All Tripod: amzn.to/3qgZRyt
    My Gear:
    Cameras
    My CZcams Camera: amzn.to/3Dkd0Ln
    Secondary CZcams Camera: amzn.to/3OpWFbD
    My Photo Camera: amzn.to/3B7pKSx
    Lenses
    My A Roll Lens: amzn.to/3Dffnz1
    Wide Angle Lens: amzn.to/3U1GByK
    Portrait Lens: amzn.to/3RRTdXt
    Other Gear
    Tripod: amzn.to/3ElcFaX
    Travel Tripod: amzn.to/3xHI6YZ
    Mini Tripod: amzn.to/3SaEAin
    Microphone: amzn.to/3qy7gWo
    Editing Computer: tinyurl.com/mvy2az6w
    Headphones: amzn.to/3B5Kvyf
    Mouse: amzn.to/3RPp1fC
    Gimbal: amzn.to/3L5wsgp
    Main Studio Light: amzn.to/3xdfB5M
    Accent Lights: amzn.to/3xfqNPf
    AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE: Some of the links used in the description are affiliate links, so if you purchase through them I may be compensated.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    Time Stamps
    0:00 - Intro
    0:31 - Physical Comparison
    4:33 - Technical Comparison
    6:13 - Recommendations
    #canon #rfs #lens
  • Zábava

Komentáře • 12

  • @adamharig
    @adamharig  Před 5 měsíci

    Grab my new ESSENTIALS Lightroom Preset Pack! 📷 foxtailshop.com/products/essentials-preset-pack

  • @truthseeker6804
    @truthseeker6804 Před 7 měsíci +21

    can you compare this rfs 10-18 vs the rf 16mm f2.8

  • @ManojM-vw9uu
    @ManojM-vw9uu Před 4 měsíci

    Nice video bro. Well explained

  • @CNC-Time-Lapse
    @CNC-Time-Lapse Před 7 měsíci +1

    I appreciated showcasing the minimum focus distance. That is something that is often overlooked in reviews.

  • @angelguzman8737
    @angelguzman8737 Před 7 měsíci +1

    The 10-18 is not bad of a lens takes some nice landscape photos on the r7

  • @hearttug
    @hearttug Před 18 dny

    Yo Adam! How big of difference is a selfie shot?! I'm holding the camera and filming myself. How much more background do you get with the 10-18?! Thanks!!

  • @jylogura
    @jylogura Před 7 měsíci +1

    Good review. I just purchased one and I’m very pleased with it. Never had the kit lens though. If you have the choice, I think it’s best to skip the kit lens all together and purchase the body and lens separately. It’s a much more usable range. Consumers kinda get sucked into the zoom features (i.e., kind of a gimmick) but I think the wider the better. It tells a better picture (no pun intended) of what you’re taking either in video or photography. I also think the 16mm 2.8 is a good choice, but if you want the versatility and don’t mind the very small drop in performance on an R7 then this new lens is a good compromise for both video and photos.

  • @andyp7787
    @andyp7787 Před 3 měsíci

    The 16mm 2.8 is a good option for wide angle. Canon really created a quagmire here. Ideally one would want both the RF 10-18 and the RF 16. Though both being wide, they have separate uses due to the aperture differences. The 16 is likely nice in low light and outdoor night shooting. The 10-18 Im assuming would struggle some in that scenario, but provide greater versatility for wide angle daytime shooting. Canon really grasps you by the short hairs here and gives a strong yank, knowing their customers would love both of these in their lens collection. They might have been able to do the 10-18 at 2.8 at a reasonable price but that’s not how you increase profits.

  • @gerhardbotha7336
    @gerhardbotha7336 Před 4 měsíci +11

    Upgrade? Going from a banana to a cauliflower is not an upgrade. It is just a change. An ultra wide lens is completely different to a wide to normal angle of view lens.

    • @doorkum
      @doorkum Před 3 měsíci +2

      Also, better to compare a fruit from a fruit.

  • @djwtf5828
    @djwtf5828 Před 2 měsíci

    where stabilization test?