Be careful with this brand, for you can get an Escentric 02, which is not the same thing as Molecule 02. They are both under the brand: Escentric Molecules, but “Molecule 02” is strictly Ambroxan (the one in the video) while “Escentric 02” is a mixture of ambroxan and other notes. While both are great for layering, Molecule note 02 is better, and the Escentric 02 leans towards being it’s own fragrance
@@zero-ol2nt it’s semi confusing but once you get how they market it you don’t have to worry. So for example, when shopping for them, the listing might say the brand: “Escentric Molecules”-and before the corresponding number (1-5) it’ll specify whether it’s “MOLECULE”, Or it might say “ESCENTRIC”. Knowing this, you’ll be able to tell whether it’s gonna be a single molecule scent fragrance (will be the ‘molecule’ version aka the great for layering), or whether that single scent molecule is gonna come complimented with other notes in the fragrance (the Escentric version)
@@blankmandastankman Yea I just did a deep dive into it on their website and I understand it now lol. Basically they have both Molecule and Escentric 1-5. Escentric seems to be the stronger line with added scents where molecule is the more basic. I think I will start with molecule 1 & 2 samples. I appreciate the response 👍
@@zero-ol2nt correct, molecule 1 & 2 are the best to start with. Worn together is a different type of awesome too imo. Also they’re easy to find for around $50-65 so don’t overpay too haha. Molecule 02 is a little hard to find rn but 01 is fairly easy to find *atm
You can get ambroxan and iso e super for much cheaper by bying the actual chemical instead of this fragrance. I think curly fragrance has a video about making molecule 01 and 02 at home.
But she never gives actual sources which to buy and they are unprepared unprocessed. You have to buy pure alcohol and such as well to create a usesable mixture. Yeah, getting Esentrics Molecule fragrances is not that cheap, but you get a high quality, finished product that performs on its own.
Molecule 01 also works well in this scenario. I prefer to layer Molecule 01 with fragrances because it's even more subtle than (ambroxan) Molecule 02 and does the same for the performance of fragrances. I find Molecule 02 to be very noticeable and distinct and is great as a standalone fragrance.
You could do this with the one, it will make it a bit sweeter. I would rather use molecule 01 instead for the one. But you definitely should overspray the one
If ambroxan is the secret to not ruining the fragrance and increasing longevity and performance...then why wouldn't Chanel just put more ambroxan in the fragrance???
I have like two bottles of this one at home since my wife loves it. I never liked it, since it too flat for me. Now I will have something to play with 😈
@@porhaltavaneppe No that is far too broad a term, if a fragrance formulation already has 50% of it being iso e super, adding more to it is going to make minimal difference to performance.
Ambrox is the olfactory equivalent of a warming filter in photography.
Be careful with this brand, for you can get an Escentric 02, which is not the same thing as Molecule 02. They are both under the brand: Escentric Molecules, but “Molecule 02” is strictly Ambroxan (the one in the video) while “Escentric 02” is a mixture of ambroxan and other notes. While both are great for layering, Molecule note 02 is better, and the Escentric 02 leans towards being it’s own fragrance
So where do you get this better molecule 01 from? They all look the same to me.
@@zero-ol2nt it’s semi confusing but once you get how they market it you don’t have to worry. So for example, when shopping for them, the listing might say the brand: “Escentric Molecules”-and before the corresponding number (1-5) it’ll specify whether it’s “MOLECULE”, Or it might say “ESCENTRIC”. Knowing this, you’ll be able to tell whether it’s gonna be a single molecule scent fragrance (will be the ‘molecule’ version aka the great for layering), or whether that single scent molecule is gonna come complimented with other notes in the fragrance (the Escentric version)
@@blankmandastankman Yea I just did a deep dive into it on their website and I understand it now lol. Basically they have both Molecule and Escentric 1-5. Escentric seems to be the stronger line with added scents where molecule is the more basic. I think I will start with molecule 1 & 2 samples. I appreciate the response 👍
@@zero-ol2nt correct, molecule 1 & 2 are the best to start with. Worn together is a different type of awesome too imo.
Also they’re easy to find for around $50-65 so don’t overpay too haha. Molecule 02 is a little hard to find rn but 01 is fairly easy to find *atm
@@blankmandastankman Nice! I appreciate it 🤙
You can get ambroxan and iso e super for much cheaper by bying the actual chemical instead of this fragrance. I think curly fragrance has a video about making molecule 01 and 02 at home.
But she never gives actual sources which to buy and they are unprepared unprocessed. You have to buy pure alcohol and such as well to create a usesable mixture. Yeah, getting Esentrics Molecule fragrances is not that cheap, but you get a high quality, finished product that performs on its own.
Molecule 01 also works well in this scenario. I prefer to layer Molecule 01 with fragrances because it's even more subtle than (ambroxan) Molecule 02 and does the same for the performance of fragrances. I find Molecule 02 to be very noticeable and distinct and is great as a standalone fragrance.
Please try and review Molecule 01 and compare it to 02 for your followers too.
Thank you for this.
Given a good idea thank you bro
Does it work with all fragrances or only certain scent profiles? Wondered if it would work with the longevity of the likes of The One EDP for example.
I think the one edp is probably just cursed with bad longevity.☹️
You could do this with the one, it will make it a bit sweeter. I would rather use molecule 01 instead for the one. But you definitely should overspray the one
If ambroxan is the secret to not ruining the fragrance and increasing longevity and performance...then why wouldn't Chanel just put more ambroxan in the fragrance???
Money you have to spray more than more bottles are sold lol
I need that o2 I'll mix-up with sauvage elixir 😵💫 and with Bentley for men intense 🔥😵💫😵💫😵💫😵💫💀💀💀
Our Brand : atriumfragrance.com/
I’m just a day on being bald do you recommend putting some on perfume on head
I’ve been shaving my head for years and always give the top and back of my head a spray no problem
What about the Projection?
What about Iso e Super? Can it be used for the same reason?
Yea, generally iso e super is better for fresh fragrances.
ISO e super is actually molecule 01 from the same brand
Does it increase projection?
ISO E Super does.
Ambroxan is for longevity.
I have like two bottles of this one at home since my wife loves it. I never liked it, since it too flat for me. Now I will have something to play with 😈
I just heard that Code absolu is discontinued.😭 Let's see how long it takes for lattafa to clone it.
😳
Bro buy Sapil Bound and trust me you will not be dissapointed, it's a cheapy and smells really close to Armani Code Absolu.
Also, the longevity and projection is beast mode
How does it compare to not a perfume by jhag
It doesnt.
Nothing compares to this perfection
Only 2 more extra hours performance - hardly seems worth it
You’d be surprised how much of a difference it makes
Used it with godolphin. The result cannot be recomanded. 😅
Finna buss
Is this preferable to 01 for layering?
I would say yes but it depends on the fragrance
My understanding is that iso e super is better for fresh fragrances.
@@porhaltavaneppe No that is far too broad a term, if a fragrance formulation already has 50% of it being iso e super, adding more to it is going to make minimal difference to performance.
@@SchoolOfScent obviously it isn't black and white but this is my experience with iso e super😅
@@porhaltavaneppe fair enough 👌
2 hours 🤣🤣🤣🤣🫠🫠🫠🫠