NASA's James Webb Space Telescope First Images Expert Panel
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 07. 2022
- Welcome to this special expert panel featuring James Webb Space Telescope scientists as they explain and breakdown the first five images from the James Webb Space Telescope. Featured speakers:
- Dr. Knicole Colón - Astrophysicist, Deputy Project Scientist for Exoplanet Science, Webb Space Telescope
- Dr. David Law - Associate Astronomer, Space Telescope Science Institute
- Dr. Stefanie Milam - Planetary Scientist and Deputy Project Scientist for Planetary Science, Webb Space Telescope
- Dr. Klaus Pontoppidan - Associate Astronomer and JWST Project Scientist, Space Telescope Science Institute
Moderated by Dr. Quyen Hart - Senior Outreach Scientist and Webb Science Communications Lead, Space Telescope Science Institute
Sign Language Interpreter: Nicolette Velasquez - Věda a technologie
![Unbelievable Cosmic Phenomena Beyond Our Galaxy | Secrets Of The Universe [All Episodes] | Spark](/img/n.gif)
Dear team JWST, please in the future, like tomorrow for example, please repeat, please turn subtittles ON, it's easier for foreigners to understand what people say if we can watch the english words and sentences. Thank you. Sorry for my horrible grammar. Best regards
You guys are simply GREAT, less than 24 hours. That's why everything in JWST works so amazing. Excelence is the word :D
The sign language taking up half the screen is SO distracting. Subtitles exist for a reason, and they can be turned on or off based on what people need. Please get rid of sign language people.
They have subtitles now .
The exoplanet hunt thrills me. Not if, but when...:-)
Yet we still cannot seem to create a material to fill potholes that last longer than 3 months.
Also the mystery of that one shoe on the side of the road eludes us.
Thx for sharing, we were waiting for it 👏👏
So happy to hear passionate and excited talking tone from scientists!
I like that this vedio's kinda...
I feel proud for this research.
Absolutely fantastic details and update..Thanks a lot for share this vedio with public ..
Best video on the images ever!
If that was 3 hours long, I could have watched it all in one viewing. Loved every second of it. 👍
Thanks for the presentation & to all the members of the teams that made Webb possible. v
Absolutely fantastic details and updates. Very exciting share, thank you.
Super!
👍🏼🚀👍🏼🚀👍🏼
Superinterresting... thank you for making this possible... 🤙💫🙏💫👍
1. We need more than one. RnD is done. So production of additional ones should be way cheaper.
2. They should duplicate the livestream of what it sees stitched and unstitched in realtime (realtime once recieved on earth that is) So everyone can see, not just a few scientists and let AI and ML have a go at it and check for anomalies in regular space object physics and regular space object shapes.
It should also be possible to extrapolate to see what space could look like realtime. Once we un derstand how new object are formed.
3. There might be more than one origin of the universe.
4. Really hope the JWST can stream video instead of just images.
Love from norway🇳🇴
Please Update about Exoplanets info
What’s wrong with subtitles?
They have caption availability.
Thanks
*Thanks so very much for the presentation.* ❤️ 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
What about the gnz11 galaxy ?
Why only look for earth-sized planets? Shouldn't you cast a wider net and not be biased?
Is it true that what we are seeing is actually video, but happening so slowly that we perceive it as still life photo/s? Can you speed it up? 🙂
JWST, can you tell how far apart the galaxies in the Stephan's Quintet are
I think NASA could make more of an impact on JWST justification by showing a brief comparison of Hubble to Webb images prior to each image discussion. After a few such comparisons I am certain it would be pretty much the same Hubble image for quite a bunch of Webb images.
Justification to whom? Webb is functioning & I've seen many side by side comparisons. v
@@virginiatyree6705 .. Thank you.
@@blujay9191 , You're welcome. v
I'd be interested in follow-ups to these first images -- like how those bunch of galaxies will behave in the next few years or what new star formations we might find in the carina nebula.
Hopefully, they'll read your comment & follow your suggestions. v
Its gonna take alot longer than a few years to see anything change
@@user-pu1mu9ph6b Yup, I'm aware. But seeing as those galaxies would be at that distance that long ago, it would be nice to imagine how they would eventually turn out
@@user-pu1mu9ph6b Changes can happen at any time, and sometimes happen quickly. Chances are there won't be much visible change though. :)
I just read a 2017 story on how looking at newer Hubble deep fields compared to older ones, the total estimate of galaxies was raised by 10x to a trillion+. Now i'm wondering if they'll do a similar estimate using webb; any plans for that?
Meanwhile about 10 other channels have already show your images , while the official channel takes more then a day to upload the information.
They also did a better job of presenting the images. Talk about dumbing down.
Did ever occur to you that they had other duties weeks prior to showing the images & priorities that made it impossible to have this video until today? Or, they should follow your timetable? v
@@virginiatyree6705 did it ever occur to you that you’re some kind of idiot, and for typing that your really being stupid,
The Fact that over Dozen’s of channels can not only download the information from them, and then produce not only informative and comprehensive videos within a day of the presentation from NASA/JWST, explaining what they have achieved,
but the Official channel who has had access to all of that information from said Telescope before anyone else can’t bring out a video for two+ days after there presentation, which they have (because they were the one giving it) and you think it’s to my timetable , it’s to be expected that there the first ones to bring out a video on it before anyone else ,
not 2 days after there’s already multiple videos on it explaining making the official channel mute to watch , because why do I need to watch there/this channel if I can get the information elsewhere , there doing themselves a disservice by being so slow , how are they supposed to get new people interested in them , if all of that is on other channels to view and watch ,
(it’s like Netflix saying oh we have the new season of stranger things out in 2 days, then right after that announcement another streaming service just has all the episodes to watch , why go to Netflix ?) do you see how ridiculous your comment actually is .
Nice
Cool
Thank you so much for doing this! 💜
I did the math. A grain of sand is about 1mm^2. If there are 10,000 galaxies/mm^2 (conservative) that's about a BILLION galaxies per square foot! I will be looking at the night sky differently from now on. 🤯
^3 .
Wow fantastic, someone should fund another 1 or 2 copies of JWST , would be a lot cheaper 2nd time .
Ghastly creaky voice. Has she got covid?
It's more pragmatic to build a better telescope based on what was learned building the Webb telescope. Science isn't about sequels and repeating what's worked before. If it were, they would've built one Hubble after another - just to get the same results. No offense intended! 😺
Ooooh
if we can see the super deep space from the beginning than that what was the actual time when our galaxy and our solar system and our earth was made? So can we see our earth in deep space past?
I’m no expert, but I’m assuming the imagery would need to come from out there to see a younger earth. The mathematics are beyond my capabilities, but interesting to contemplate.
@@Andrea.1tree yes really very interesting, and I have another doubt that about black hole. The honorable Scientist are assuming that it is a getaway for another universe, but I think they are just the recycler. they eats planets, stars, galaxies and clusters and form them in dust to make them new stars and galaxies.
@@MuhammadShahid-er9ie I like that idea. Like the birth of a Big Bang.
How can we see the lights right after the big bang? If our earth is created from the same big bang, how is it that we are here and the lights of those stars are just arrived to the telescope?
What is this
Hello there
Show 999 trillion in light years.
As an ASL teacher (learner) as I go to my son, is no one; labeled as they have to themselves “experts” aware they have an ASL interpreter next to them?
1. She wasn’t mentioned.
2. That’s AN expert, no thanks at all.
3. This is on the OFFICIAL PAGE.
Like anyone?
Hi🇧🇷
🇨🇲❤️
Webb Telescope is doing good in L2.God bless.
...you see this and you still believe in a god...bah
Remember is cost Africans 10 billion dollars, which equates to incredible malnutrition. That with corrupt Chinese companies emptying the coffers of African countries with needless fake infrastructure projects, we are at least owed people who have some semblance of primary school education and the ability to speak English clearly
Love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩🇮🇳❤️🇧🇩🙏🙏🙏Aum🕉️
Did the Russians contribute to this project? What HAVE they contributed to the world in the last 50 years, anyway?
Closed Captions. Have you heard of the term?
👋
Why do all stars have 8 bright points coming out on photos I see 8 sides on like Jupiter poles the moons crators and bees hunny cones
FJB!
I'm trying to learn and this girl on the right is throwing up gang signs.
When will James Webb telescope look at aliens Dyson sphere's let know if aliens are for real
It's been over 20 days and the public haven't got a single image, people start to think jwt is broken
You don't need a signer taking up screen space. Subtitles exist. Less waffle would be good. Bigger pictures would be good. What muppet controls and edits for this channel. 4k pictures and prattle on in the back ground.
A signer is probably for deaf people attending to the event live?
Literally unwatchable. I was really interested in this discussion, but I can't even focus on it with the sign language person.
Jems wedd time device 🇧🇩🥰🥰🥰🥰
It's incredible that you can be here and spell the name so wrong
@@djentlover i m not great villain british the Super demon.🇬🇧🇬🇧⬅️⬅️
@@mayukhpurkayastha2649 Why you write wrong spelling ??As a Bangladeshi it is a disgrace. I am a Bangladeshi ....So please don't disgrace or to break your country.oky
From: Bangladesh 🇧🇩
Chapatoli, Sherpur-2100
Grade 7
BLMGS
@@jmsamia8583 ব্রিটিশের গুলাম কি তুমি? jams wedd দজ্জাল শয়তান ইবলিশ এর power. অসীম দয়ালু আল্লাহ পাক তোকে জ্ঞানী শয়তান ইবলিশের✝️ হাত থেকে রক্ষা করুক।হে আল্লাহ পাক তুমি তোমার সন্তান শয়তান ইবলিশকে আদম আ এর মতো মূর্খ সৃষ্টি করো।মহাজ্ঞানী আল বেরুনী,মহাজ্ঞানী ইবনে
Why someone is dancing right in front of her ??🤔🤔🤔
Sorry ...You don't understand it ...She is just act right in front of her . .... Please don't To break it ..It is very important for us and our next generation...
From: Bangladesh 🇧🇩
Grade 7
BLMGS
I hate to sound like an insensitive prick, and I may well be, but how many deaf folks actually watched this?...Its just.... My god...
I believe the initial commenter made the excellent point that not everyone has English as a mother tongue and subtitles would greatly assist in making the presentation more effective and easier to understand.
Hopefully, the cc & a transcript will be posted with future presentations. v
The hand talk is really distracting. Optional subtitles would be better.
yeah, I think its awesome that they tried to make it as available as possible but they made it so I cant concentrate on the information. It's like try to watch something while someone is constantly waving at you.
Viewing on a PC, I opened up another static plain window and overlayed it over the top of the signer area. Less distracting. 👍
First?
Can we do away with the humans and get straight to the science!?
Exactly. They need elocution lessons and stop all this endless CCP brown nosing
I was wrong, this is the dumbest comment.
Very brave of you guys owning the channel to censor peoples opinions and critiques about the horrible quality of the latest videos. I literally wrote a comment saying that if you do that people will lose respect for you guys and the JWST as a whole. Yet you still did it anyways, very disappointing. I'm unsubscribing this is unacceptable behaviour from you guys.
A moment of silence for anyone that thinks there are photos being taken.
???
Space deniers are funny.
The vast majority of deaf people don't use ASL. So performative, come on people. Not my space stuff. Ffs.
Thank you...I was just thinking the same thing. I am no expert by any means, and I may very well be wrong, but would be curious to know the numbers of deaf people that require ASL as opposed to closed captioning.
Like if I was deaf and about to watch something on TV, before I attempted, I would make sure I have whatever aid is needed and not have to depend on a live interpreter.
" So performative, come on people. Not my space stuff." - what is _really_ bothering you?
Also the fact that there is a ton of non native english speakers which need subtitles to understand.
I swear this ASL translator BS is nothing else than virtue signaling lmao.
@@TheDanEdwards , Entitled immature-basement dwellers, that's what they are. v
@@jefftee448 Hey! I hope this doesn't come across as hostile, and it isn't by any means directed at you alone, it's just that many similar statements in this comment section made me somewhat sad, and eager to reply. Cause, honestly, can't we just be happy for the small number of people that do use ASL as their first language and this information has now become accessible to? Why do we need to get so annoyed by it? It seems so much more easily said then done to just say 'I would make sure I have whatever aid is needed and not have to depend on a live interpreter', when written language can be extremely hard to learn for deaf people (since it is based on spoken language, and has totally different grammar than ASL), and tools to learn it may generally not be as accessible to them as to hearing people. I totally understand that it is somewhat disproportionate in relation to the many other languages that are spoken in the USA (I'm focusing on the USA cause NASA is a USA Government Agency I guess), but I feel like it would be so much more productive to start a discussion on what languages/people aren't represented, rather than the other way around. :) Idk, just my two cents.
Audience all over the country? Umm your talking about the universe. Insulted as someone watching from overseas.
what do you think the N in NASA stands for?
@@-EchoesIntoEternity- Naive or nescient. You choose.
They definitely need to have a meeting about a world-wide audience & how it to be inclusive. v
The hand person is so annoying 😂 I can’t even watch
A science channel and most of the comments are from cavemen.
As expected really bad presentation, instead of showing what JWST can do that hubble cannot, useless explanations about trivial astronomy stuff
"Oh look that's a star!!!!, JWST can make photos of stars!! and light being bent by galaxy clusters!" , nothing that we have not seen already a million times from hubble and other telescopes.
Why are you here?
JWST is taking much sharper images than Hubble can--
Do you wake up and start bitching about people going about their jobs - or do you have a cup of coffee, first? 🧐
I agree with you, Victor! What a disappointment!
@@TheDanEdwards Good question.
Since this channel is the official yt channel for JWST, even if I see that most content is of very low quality, I would expect to get from time to time some really good videos from people that actually know what they're talking about, like already happens with NASA yt channel that is run by the same not so great NASA communications "team" and that has also lots of useless videos, but where you do get sometimes very nice content, where the engineers/astronomers get to talk and decide the content of the video more than the PR team.
I have not lost hope yet, so I may come back... and I may end up probably writing another rant... so I apologize in advance :)
Total rubbish images. NASA did not even make efforts to un-distort
👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼 😬
@@jeffdavis5723 *Hey 👋🏼 Jeff buddy.*