@@wawaawawawawaawaTHE CLASSIC MECHANICS ARE NOT BETTER 💀. The gameplay for classic battlefront was produced many years ago and is far more clunky than 2017 Battlefront. In every aspect for multiplayer play, 2017 battlefront functions better.
@@tomk8350They tried to do a remaster of kotor 2. "Aspyr Says KOTOR 2 DLC restored content DLC (Basically remaster) Was Canceled Because 'A Third Party Objected'." But never failed to specify who or why so... laziness?
@@MrDepraved Well, the restored content mod is more of a few hours worth of additional content than a full on remaster. Having played and internally modded the RCM onto KOTOR 2 on mobile, I can say it's not a remaster. But yeah I could see how cancelling it would be insulting to the Nintendo community who were planning on playing it.
Folks bought it up like hot cakes without a shadow of doubt on how the game would release and honestly I can't even blame the developers anymore its easy money
It's honestly dumb how folks expected Aspyr of all companies to deliver a game that could fill that BF void. Glad i didn't buy into that nonsense at all.
1. For singleplayer, yes it absolutely is. 2. Not everyone has or wants to play on Xbox or PC. This is the first time the original BF games have been on PlayStation since they originally released on PS2 in 2004/2005 and the first time EVER on a Nintendo platform.
It’s smart in a way, they know they’ve sold a bunch of copies but the last thing they want to do now is have to support the multiplayer long term - that’s expensive and there would be 0 gain for them, so they make the multiplayer as poor as possible and a lot of players will leave. Minimal server costs and upkeep going forwards.
What I don't understand is that the 2005 BF2 dev tools came out with a server hosting tool, and i know people were still keeping that alive... what happened to that?
@@kingorange7739 I’m probably just being paranoid 😂 I wouldn’t be surprised if they do the absolute bare minimum they can get away with though…they’ve basically made the bulk of the money they are going to make from this now, and unless they plan on introducing some sort of microtransactions (which they probably won’t for obvious reasons) there’s very little incentive for them to do a good job now.
@@ACameronUK except problem is, their money making is backfiring considering the amount of people getting refunds straight away. And again, if they don’t get the servers properly working, they will be sued. More importantly, it is in their better interests to do more than the bare minimum otherwise audiences won’t trust them at all within their next product
This is, in fact, not the best way to play on Xbox, which is backwards compatible with the original Battlefront II. Which is vastly superior due to all the bugs in the re-release.
I was blown away by the Spyro, Shadow of Collosus, and Demon Souls remakes, they're practically whole new games. I don't know why companies think they can get away with reselling old games without putting in half as much effort into remastering them.
I’ve been playing it on the switch. It honestly feels like this game was made for switch first, then everything else, it runs smooth no bugs minus a few sound glitches from time to time and multiplayer on my SWITCH is fine, only lagged once in the 5 hours I did play and it was just one game.
That's been my experiences as well... it's been mostly smooth, stable, and I've had no issues with server availability... everyone's mileage may vary, but I know I'm having fun for what I paid, a decent trip down memory lane
I’ve said this before. I’m only looking forward to the third Jedi game, but given that the Director isn’t returning and EA is EA. I can’t help with fear that it’ll be in big trouble…
My mother asked me why I'm still at the dinner table. I told her my food was "2020s video game releases". From then on she understood and knew that my food wasn't finished.
@@rexthewolf3149Jedi survivor and spider-man 2. The former still being broken. I'm not saying games aren't good, they are, but they lack polish on day 1
@@NoCluYT yeah that’s not even half, BG3, Resident Evil 4 Remake, Dead Space Remake, Street Fighter 6, Tears of the kingdom. All perfectly functional on day one. And those were the first to come to my head.
Yeah. I mean calling this "trash" is going overboard here. If you're ONLY going into this for the multiplayer, then sure. You have an argument. But the singleplayer(the only mode I care about) is great. Personally, I'm enjoying it very much. Very nostalgic.
Unfortunately people don’t learn. I saw a dude put a video out before it even released talking about how it’s a scam. The whole company Aspyr is a scam. After what they did to the Kotor Remake and their other Star Wars re-releases the company should be sued.
their other ports were done pretty well - like jedi academy or outcast - sure they had some issues like pop-ins but nothing compared to this collection
@@thestarkknightreturns yeah but everything before that they fucked up you can already tell how the pudding is going to taste if you see how the ingredients are treated before they're even added into the pudding
If you think about it though, what’s in it for them supporting the game going forward? The game has no microtransactions, and they have already made the money they are going to make from the product, I doubt they really care if it succeeds going forwards, they may even want it to fail 🤷♂️
I just realized Mace isn't in the 2017 battlefront. I want to replay the classic one so much it is so much better imo. More maps, characters, galactic conquest too man I miss my childhood
@@dylansava4082some things are better when they are untouched nostalgia is a good feeling but it won’t be the same how Does a company ruin a literal copy paste port this game is abysmal man
Idk about the other consoles or PC but on PS5 you can’t switch off inverted controls in space battles which doesn’t make any sense at all. Like how is that feature gone? This is a straight up port of both battlefront games which means everything should’ve been ported to the classic collection, so how tf is the ability to switch off inverted controls not there?? You could do that in the originals. Did they deliberately get rid of that feature??? WHY?!?!?☠️
I bought it on PS5 mainly for offline play, but the aiming is so poorly calibrated that it's a dealbreaker for the whole experience. Sniping is incredibly difficult, turning becomes extremely slow because of aim stickiness even as a Jedi, ships are very sluggish to control (and I think using the tow cable to bring down an AT-AT is flat-out impossible unless you max out the X-axis sensitivity), and it just feels wrong as a longtime console player of the Battlefront games.
I'm glad I'm not the only person who thinks the old gen controls felt better. I expect dated controls, but I don't recall the controls on Playstation 2 being this clunky.
Go back and play on ps2. The controls were clunky and the aim was horrible. We tend to look back on our youth with rose tinted glasses. This new version single player plays exactly as it did on oh Xbox and ps2. Now online that’s a different story.
Only reason I see to buy is for PlayStation and Switch. I can play the old version of the games for cheaper. If the multiplayer doesn’t work then why get it. The old version even gets the hero’s and maps for Xbox. It even has a slight graphics update
BF2(2017) is the best and they need revive it by releasing new content. That game still looks graphically beautiful to me and runs great. It’s a damn shame they stopped supporting it
I fell for all the hype. I never got to experience this game as a kid, and wanted to see what everyone was talking about. Over the past few days, I’ve still played EA/Dice’s Battlefront 2 more. I’m just more used to the gameplay and mechanics, and just haven’t been able to adjust to the old games. The current one is just more enjoyable to me.
Nevermind this train wreck of a release and the eventual release of the open world SW game that has no Jedi/Sith. Why not make an inFamous style game in the Star Wars universe where your morality scale leads you to be a Jedi or Sith depending on your decisions/actions.
As a Xbox player, On launch multiplayer was completely unplayable during launch but its playing a lot smoother right now with over a dozen dedicated servers as of now and me and my brother were able to join each other in our own lobby as well if that helps anyone. They also raised the original 100 reinforcement count to 350 most likely because they realized the matches were going way too fast
Yeaaah i think i want a refund.... The only reason I bought it was for the online play as I have the originals...... If I wanted to play galactic conquest or instant action, I've already got that and it works perfect.😅
If you spent 30 dollars just to play online….. that’s a yikes, you should dip into single player. They added a few more vehicles to maps, it plays very smooth. Kinda shitty y’all are hating on a 20 year old game just for online………. Kinda dumb tbfh
@@kwisniew99 Hard cope take incoming -This game is fun with friends. Any game is fun with friends which is why Battlefront (2017) exist and so do other multiplayer, coop, and singleplayer titles exist.
majority of people bought it for the multiplayer. the story mode could be played on the original pc/ps1 version which can pretty much run on any potato laptop
@@NoCluYTyeah but classic collection is so much more refined and actually better on pc, if I played the originals I have to literally change my dpi on my pc so I don’t 360 just by moving my mouse a centimeter
This collection is gonna break Actmans heart, such a horrible buggy, glitchy collection, it looks so bad, worse than the original games. No reason to get this collection on xbox or pc, as you had the original games on those platforms. The pc versions of the original games already had multiplayer support from 2017 onwards, and people still play it alot. #notmybattlefront
should have just overhauled new graphics on it and taken their time. Yes the look takes you back, but tbh with what we have now they could have charged more with better graphics and a WORKING game upon release.
It’s also horrible on at least ps5, the controller sensitivity is awful, there’s no deadzone, and it just feels like actually horrible to aim, and that’s also because it doesn’t seem to have aim down sensitivity it seems to be the same which is just awful.
I was about to call you out, but I recall the originals not being clunky on the PS2. I expected dated controls, but not like whats happening on in the collection.
Go back and play ps2. I just did. Almost same controls as ps5 is exhibiting. You’re thinking back on nostalgia, not facts. The original controls were clunky on ps2. Aiming and hitting anything was difficult and had a learning curve. The problem is most gamers have so many options to help them aim in current gen games that they have gone soft.
The Switch port is running very well in MY experience, but on the PS5 version I only experienced the hit detection problem together with some other minor issues, is bad, but I dont think its unplayable...
A lot of channels only care about the multiplayer aspect, which predictably was a disaster as almost every game has multiplayer bad at launch anymore. Really, they rushed it especially considering they made it available for every current gaming console PLUS PC. That is a lot. Maybe because I am generally not into Star Wars gaming and this is mostly a nostalgia buy for me and I only play offline, but I think it’s worth the money especially if you don’t have the old games anymore. It’s 2 classic games, with significantly better lighting and improved graphics and frame rate. (Let’s be real about a third of the maps in the original games, at least on the old consoles, we’re unplayable because you couldn’t see anything).
@@charliegriffey7773 biggest problem for pc would be that they dont added an anti-cheat or account-id system so even IF it would run good - it would been flooded by hackers after 2 days anyway & die instantly
Star Wars Battlefront II (2017), outside of its pay to win release, was built from the ground up and had a stable release and was fully playable and IS a fun casual game. 2017's Battlefront was also built from the ground up, which makes the Battlefront Collection even more unacceptable in the state that Aspiyr launched these remasters in. I play on PS5, and from my experience playing the collection, the matchmaking at times crashes the application, and when I did get in matches there was bad netcode and latency between players. In the collection, Battlefront 1 runs ok, but Battlefront 2 was not optimized at all for its multiplayer. Someone tell me how Rise of the Empire and how it runs on 2 players, as I have yet to play it. The Battlefront Collection was suppose to be this golden opportunity to give console players the chance to play the multiplayer that many of us were not able to if you played on PS2.
I'll never understand why they had their hopes up for this shit when it was clearly nostalgia bait and easy money for them. SW fans nowadays are suffering from brainrot fr.
On PC the sensitivity is terrible super slow. For me that alone makes it unplayable. The story campaign half of the cutscene are not showing 😂 SMH. I had fun because the game is a masterpiece but my god these bugs are insane. We are in 2024 not 1800s 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ BTW Aspyr responded they said they are working on the gsme to fix it
I feel like more people are playing bf2 some games are left to be untouched with this disaster off a copy paste port… (I like how on bf2 now u actually have good teammates heroes vs villains)
I would like to point out that they also botched the single player because all of the victory cutscenes are just missing. I have to say after playing the original two games before this came out, they are fantastic game that work great. This collection broke both games and made them run worse and Hoth XL has a cavalcade of graphical issues on Instant Action.
I refunded my PC copy. If they fix the multiplayer and it still has a solid playerbase in a few months, I'll pick it up again. but I'd rather just buy something that works during the steam sale
Whoever has an xbox install EA's battlefront 2 the galatic conquest has been alive for 2 days straight we just need more to get supremacy back up and running
Played online on ps5, the games are incredibly short, no aim assist whatsoever but those are minor. I played single player galactic conquest for no more then 2 full games before the game crashed twice. When the game didn’t crash my ship completely disappeared while the cpu moved around the map in circles never landing on a planet to start another match. I loved these growing up and I’m torn on getting a refund due to the hoops I’d have to jump through to get one as well as holding out on hoping it gets fixed……..2/10 easy, damn shame
They matches are longer now they changed from 100 lives each team to 350 and there's no aim assist on in multiplayer cause if aim assist was on you would just lock on to every enemy each gun fight cause the old battlefronts have way too much aim assist when it's on
I'm on PS5 & it's a broken unplayable mess even in offline single player. In SWBF2 I couldn't even aim at max sensitivity cause it's way too slow along with an extreme amount of glitches. Still trying to get refund.
This was just a money grab. $45 for one solid game that you can buy for $15 on Xbox one, and one kind of decent game but no added content. So stupid. “Buy our $600 console so you can replace all of your games for $90 a piece and then when you complain we’ll give you a 20 year old game with slightly better graphics for $50”
I played it on my ps5 and it’s a disaster. Can’t get multiplayer to work, often freezes in the menu.. I last maybe 2 matches before the game freezes and I’m either booted from the game or I have to force quit the game myself due to more freezing. Not to mention each match lasts like 3 minutes. The missing cutscenes are outrageous. The audio problems also piss me off. I can’t hear the in-game announcers because they’re so quiet and the aiming feels so sticky and weird it’s so difficult to play. I’m honestly shocked with how bad this game is. I didn’t think it was possible to make a 2005 game worse in 2024.
Seems to be an issue on console, from what I’ve heard pc and switch are fine. As for servers they’ll get to that. Kinda shitty to hate on a game that just came out there will be bugs like in every game that’s came out in a span of 2 years. I havnt got any of the crashes or bugs. I would pay money to see you remaster a game and have working servers. So why y’all bitching like they won’t fix it
@@kwisniew99imagine reading that no one gets half of Halo CEs cutscenes just simply because. Then you say they're bitching over it lmao. How much further can you take their cock down your throat?
@@kwisniew99who tf expects to pay for something that doesn't work? Wtf are you talking about? I bought the game to find out you can't play inverted. Wtf is that about? I've been gaming my whole life I can't change 20 years of muscle memory I have to play inverted. In all my years I've never had this happen to me before in any game. It was in the original games too obviously and they took it out. The game is all the way bad I want my money back.
The balance update on the Xbox version is a disappointment for me. The nerfed starfighters are not welcome. Removing the x wing from plains and making it nerfed was a bad call.
At least on Nintendo Switch, the ping was just terrible. Everyone is jumping around and freezing. I love how it's available on newer consoles, but I could never even think about purchasing for PC.
Battlefront has the chance of being the greatest AAA FPS game ever. But its like every company is afraid of the challenge. Somehow there needs to be a translation of these classics into BF2 (2017), which ended being good but could’ve been even better.
Please represent us Split Screen enjoyers! I had my siblings over to play this with me, and we couldn't make it work. Not only is it limited to 2-Player Split Screen, but we weren't even able to sign in a second player on XB1. WE NEED 4 PLAYER SPLIT SCREEN! IT ISN'T ROCKET SCIENCE.
In my opinion, I think this is ridiculous. I understand that we expect games to be polished and work correctly at launch. However now-a-days, the bar is set so high and expectations are so exponential, that we don't give things a chance, even if the launch of something is a little rough. The game hasn't been out a WEEK YET! I feel it is extremely premature to judge this product so early. A game is either praised, or shit on. If something is not quite right, "This game is horrible". When they fix it, "Well they should have done this in the first place". There seems to be no winning, or even acknowledgement when things get fixed. Let me know if you agree.
Believe it or not, people are pretty fucking sick and tired of being sold a broken product with the vague promise of "oh b-b-but they'll fix it later!" Expecting a functioning product, especially when said product is a port of two games from *20 years ago,* shouldn't be too much to ask for. Stop making excuses for this shit. You're part of the problem.
People aren’t judging a game because “it’s early”. They chose to release it and charge full price. The bare minimum expectation is that the game works, and it doesn’t. Don’t make excuses for companies screwing you over.
We should have gotten actual remakes of these games. Even if this release worked perfectly it doesn't change the fact that these games are still very old and outdated. We need Battlefront 3!
With the BF2 (2017) launch and Kotor remake debacle I was not going to preorder or buy this at launch anyways. But when this didn’t even seem to be a proper remaster either, I had really low expectations. I expected some ruff edges in multiplayer 64 player lobbies on Switch cause it’s Switch. I also expect small or no changes to the outdated controls and hit boxes. They still managed to even under deliver on those expectation with multiplayer being trash across all platforms 😢.
Joining games was tough, but I got in a 64 player game that had the reinforcements up to 350 and had a blast playing lag wasn't bad. My friends couldn't join me though, their screens would time out. They ended up in other servers and gave up trying to join me. Yes some servers have the tickets way to low. You can tell people that never played the game set a lot of the aspyer servers up. The map orders were running same map back to back different eras. Which is the idiotic thing the 2018 BF2 servers do too. No one wants to play the same map twice in a row ever.
I bought the game on Xbox series S primarily for the multiplayer as I imagine most of everyone who owns the originals did. And the multiplayer does not work. The game crashes when looking for a lobby. Refunded the game today. Hope this didn’t happen with anyone else
@@StarWarsHour I get that but og’s are un optimized for pc hence why I got the remaster. People are literally just buying the game for online….. that makes me sick. I get that the ogs still exist. BUT THEY JUST REVAMPED A 20 YEAR OLD GAME. It’s a shame seeing all these idiots pay 35 dollars just for online. I bet you these people pay for the same cod every year too.
@@StarWarsHour I also agree that 62 gigs is insane for both games into one. See again valid reasons are great the people bitching about the multiplayer and only that make me sick
The XL mode impressed me. The amount of bots onscreen do turn any session into the large-scale, chaotic, all-out wars that you can't even experience on the newer Battlefronts!
In all my childhood, playing battlefront 2 on PS2 was the most fun I’ve had. I never had multiplayer besides screen split whenever I have a friend over. I’m always a single player kind of guy and wanted to feel nostalgic. But if they say this game has issues to play. Then I can wait when they fix it.
This is my experience as well, but my nostalgia mostly lies with playing Battlefront I on the OG Xbox as a kid. Also, I can’t really justify buying it in its current state considering the asking price and the cost of living rn.
They are actually reading all the feedback. Whether negative or positive, the truth is they sacrifice this remake to generally measuring the public opinion about: if it is worth to invest on Battlefront 3, when it's worth and how? How thirsty are the BF fans for a new and huge BF game and etc. They already knew that this lunch and this remake of a 20-year-old game could be a disappointment but what they in 2nd or 3d layers want are the thirst for new BF. These are all vulnerable data to help them for the -probably- Battlefront 3.
@@coltonwilkie241 yes, but even small negativ feedback will help them for their next projects. What i heard was the consol versions were good mades. It's all cost-benefit analysis for the future with a small risk and small attempt.
@@kwisniew99 nah I’m just not falling for the SCAM buddy 🤣 I’ve bought this game on the ps2, when I had a ps3, and on Pc and then they go and make a “new” version which don’t even work and the people who bought the game before cant connect that is sad af 😭 but of course leave it to “yes” boys like you who buy everything they drop bc of nostalgia or content gimme a break ur the kid here
@@thetricky5569 lmao you sir need a massive glass of cope what scam? Yes I think 35 is outrageous and the amount of gigs is insane. They’ve revamped mechanics and textures. Literally just online that dosnt work, oh I get it now you probably buy the same cod every year don’t you?
I play on console and I refunded it already😂😂😂 what a joke. Don’t know why every game company slacks on making battle front games. It’s an automatic money maker if made right and this rerelease proves that it will make money. Spending $40 on a game that came out roughly 20 years ago and thousands doing the same proves my point. I hope Star Wars battlefront gets the love it deserves.
I played the original bf2 as a kid, but never got to play it online on official servers. I do not feel cheated, and the multiplayer does work, just not very well. I think they should fix the multiplayer, and possibly adjust the mechanics around aiming because it feels too dated. I dont remember it (the aim mechanics) being that bad on ps2. The way they are now with zero aim assist in dedicated servers makes it impossible to reliably aim. I am a little surprised that mouse and keyboard support was not an option for consoles either. Crossplay would be dope, but unless they smooth out the acceleration curve on controller theres no way crossplay with consoles vs pc would be playable.
I’m a single player type of guy but I noticed the ai’s act smarter in the classic collection than in the older ones. I was so excited to try the online for the first time because I was to interested in the single player, so since online is us playable it’s just unfortunate and why why why. I play on Xbox series x and my single player games get buggy especially on galactic conquest attacked a planet won and it was still red. Please please fix game I love love Star Wars battlefront.
My experience on Xbox has been great. All this hate is being blown out of proportion There’s only 3 things I’d change: Increase the ticket count from 100 to 250 (BF2) Disable friendly fire Disable friendly force push (This one is a problem, I’ve been thrown around repeatedly by teammates and it sucks) I’m also aware there’s a kick system but I don’t know how to vote yes so if you find out please comment
My idea is that Aspyr (love their other ports mostly) was used to their other Star Wars games having a grand total of 20 dudes on discord playing it and didn't think they'd need the server space
Is the game worth it? Depends on what you want to get out of it, but for Switch and PlayStation it strikes me as a solid purchase. Xbox and PC I would wait to see if the online gets fixed. I got this for Switch and am very happy with my purchase. The online hasn’t been great, but that’s only a small part of why I wanted to get it for Switch
Why not remake the remakes, and make them not suck and remove all the micro transactions? I know it's difficult saying no to robbing your costumers, but maybe you'd get some new ones if you did?
Oh boy, on console it’s definitely a scam. Honestly if the hit detection worked a little better and better ping it might be more fun but damn. Its just too buggy.
So this is the MCC disaster for Star Wars fans. Kinda bummed about this one because i definitely want to play this as I never got to experience classic battlefront.
I don't understand why they didn't just give us more maps and characters on the most RECENT game... I'd pay for that, no doubt.
EA is over the current BF2 and some other developers are over this collevtion pack. i think lol
BF2 2017 is The Best But they Scrapped it for BF 2042,see how they Turned out
Are you guys playing the same game? 2017bf2 sucked ass. The game mechanics are better by far in the classic
Ps5 has issues, nintendo switch works very well
@@wawaawawawawaawaTHE CLASSIC MECHANICS ARE NOT BETTER 💀. The gameplay for classic battlefront was produced many years ago and is far more clunky than 2017 Battlefront. In every aspect for multiplayer play, 2017 battlefront functions better.
After the whole Kotor 2 debacle with Aspyr i am surprised people thought the collection would be any different.
played jedi outcast & academy - it was good & only had very minor issues & yes even the multiplayer worked fine in my experience
Fill me in, what happened with Kotor 2 and Aspyr?
@@tomk8350They tried to do a remaster of kotor 2.
"Aspyr Says KOTOR 2 DLC restored content DLC (Basically remaster) Was Canceled Because 'A Third Party Objected'." But never failed to specify who or why so... laziness?
@@MrDepraved Well, the restored content mod is more of a few hours worth of additional content than a full on remaster. Having played and internally modded the RCM onto KOTOR 2 on mobile, I can say it's not a remaster. But yeah I could see how cancelling it would be insulting to the Nintendo community who were planning on playing it.
@@tomk8350 My bad, thanks for filling in things that I missed. I thought the DLC was a overhaul of the game. Apologies
Folks bought it up like hot cakes without a shadow of doubt on how the game would release and honestly I can't even blame the developers anymore its easy money
It's honestly dumb how folks expected Aspyr of all companies to deliver a game that could fill that BF void. Glad i didn't buy into that nonsense at all.
Yep. “Hey, look at this trailer! Now pre-order!” - Aspyr
This is definitely not the definitive way to play on console. That would be through back-compat on Series X.
1. For singleplayer, yes it absolutely is.
2. Not everyone has or wants to play on Xbox or PC. This is the first time the original BF games have been on PlayStation since they originally released on PS2 in 2004/2005 and the first time EVER on a Nintendo platform.
@@fireice3820 PC master race/mods/working online
Is the multiplayer on the original battlefront 2 on xbox still working?
@@ZAZA_822 no that was OG Xbox live that’s dead and gone
Once Star Wars was touched by Disney it was over
We had so many good Star Wars games before Disney booted in and ruined everything
Facts
It’s smart in a way, they know they’ve sold a bunch of copies but the last thing they want to do now is have to support the multiplayer long term - that’s expensive and there would be 0 gain for them, so they make the multiplayer as poor as possible and a lot of players will leave. Minimal server costs and upkeep going forwards.
What I don't understand is that the 2005 BF2 dev tools came out with a server hosting tool, and i know people were still keeping that alive... what happened to that?
@@PoniesNSunshine that’s a good point, maybe they pulled a rockstar and had that stopped in order to boost demand for the remaster? 🤷♂️
Problem is if they don’t fix the servers at least for players ability to privately operate them, they can be sued for false advertising
@@kingorange7739 I’m probably just being paranoid 😂 I wouldn’t be surprised if they do the absolute bare minimum they can get away with though…they’ve basically made the bulk of the money they are going to make from this now, and unless they plan on introducing some sort of microtransactions (which they probably won’t for obvious reasons) there’s very little incentive for them to do a good job now.
@@ACameronUK except problem is, their money making is backfiring considering the amount of people getting refunds straight away. And again, if they don’t get the servers properly working, they will be sued. More importantly, it is in their better interests to do more than the bare minimum otherwise audiences won’t trust them at all within their next product
Rather pay 30 bucks for a 20 year old game then 70 dollars for a triple a game that’s terrible
Or 5$ for 2017 BF2 on steam
@@JustxLiving909 I already have that too. But yes that’s also a good option
This is, in fact, not the best way to play on Xbox, which is backwards compatible with the original Battlefront II. Which is vastly superior due to all the bugs in the re-release.
Is the multiplayer still up in the backwards compatible ones?
I was blown away by the Spyro, Shadow of Collosus, and Demon Souls remakes, they're practically whole new games.
I don't know why companies think they can get away with reselling old games without putting in half as much effort into remastering them.
I’ve been playing it on the switch. It honestly feels like this game was made for switch first, then everything else, it runs smooth no bugs minus a few sound glitches from time to time and multiplayer on my SWITCH is fine, only lagged once in the 5 hours I did play and it was just one game.
That's been my experiences as well... it's been mostly smooth, stable, and I've had no issues with server availability... everyone's mileage may vary, but I know I'm having fun for what I paid, a decent trip down memory lane
Yeah, I have to input the cheats twice but it’s still good.
So I guess there’s hope then.
Same here. Seems like it's mostly PC issues. It's more so become the hot topic to talk about till the next thing comes along to dog pile on.
I’ve said this before. I’m only looking forward to the third Jedi game, but given that the Director isn’t returning and EA is EA. I can’t help with fear that it’ll be in big trouble…
It would be nice if Star Wars Outlaws turns out to be a fun game, Ubisoft dosent seem to care about making games that are actually fun anymore though.
@@eddiehendrix2013 so true Ubisoft is caca
Do we need Jedi three? The second one ended pretty good I thought I’m not sure where it would even go or at least it wouldn’t be about cal anymore.
I've got a bad feeling about this...
My mother asked me why I'm still at the dinner table. I told her my food was "2020s video game releases". From then on she understood and knew that my food wasn't finished.
😂😂
Nice
Then you clearly didn’t pay attention to 2023
@@rexthewolf3149Jedi survivor and spider-man 2. The former still being broken. I'm not saying games aren't good, they are, but they lack polish on day 1
@@NoCluYT yeah that’s not even half, BG3, Resident Evil 4 Remake, Dead Space Remake, Street Fighter 6, Tears of the kingdom. All perfectly functional on day one. And those were the first to come to my head.
I mostly play single player on PS5 and I haven't had any issues except the occasional audio bug, which is more annoying than game breaking.
Yeah. I mean calling this "trash" is going overboard here. If you're ONLY going into this for the multiplayer, then sure. You have an argument. But the singleplayer(the only mode I care about) is great. Personally, I'm enjoying it very much. Very nostalgic.
Well the point was if you only care about singleplayer on pc you can get the same game for 10 dollars vs the 40 "remaster"
Install a graphic mod and you are golden
Lazy, unoptimised , half-assed, cash grab of a re-release. AVOID Aspyr like the PLAGUE.
Unfortunately people don’t learn. I saw a dude put a video out before it even released talking about how it’s a scam. The whole company Aspyr is a scam. After what they did to the Kotor Remake and their other Star Wars re-releases the company should be sued.
their other ports were done pretty well - like jedi academy or outcast - sure they had some issues like pop-ins but nothing compared to this collection
You're crazy, the Jedi Knight ports were superb.
@@thestarkknightreturns yeah but everything before that they fucked up you can already tell how the pudding is going to taste if you see how the ingredients are treated before they're even added into the pudding
My only problem is that the matches are too short. Every match ends in like 3-5 min
Right and in that 5 minutes you Dies atleast twice lol Trash Cash Grab Accross Multi Platforms
If you think about it though, what’s in it for them supporting the game going forward? The game has no microtransactions, and they have already made the money they are going to make from the product, I doubt they really care if it succeeds going forwards, they may even want it to fail 🤷♂️
Your only problem? So I guess you're actually able to hit your shots? Cause mine does not even register lol
That’s another issue see I’ll agree with actual valid reason.
So join a server that has 32 ai count.
What’s worth it was getting both battlefront for five dollars each on the Xbox store. Not 35 for broken multiplayer and added characters
5:38 "This is a great scam" lmao 😂
I just realized Mace isn't in the 2017 battlefront. I want to replay the classic one so much it is so much better imo. More maps, characters, galactic conquest too man I miss my childhood
@@dylansava4082some things are better when they are untouched nostalgia is a good feeling but it won’t be the same how Does a company ruin a literal copy paste port this game is abysmal man
Idk about the other consoles or PC but on PS5 you can’t switch off inverted controls in space battles which doesn’t make any sense at all. Like how is that feature gone? This is a straight up port of both battlefront games which means everything should’ve been ported to the classic collection, so how tf is the ability to switch off inverted controls not there?? You could do that in the originals. Did they deliberately get rid of that feature??? WHY?!?!?☠️
Because they hate their customers.
I bought it on PS5 mainly for offline play, but the aiming is so poorly calibrated that it's a dealbreaker for the whole experience. Sniping is incredibly difficult, turning becomes extremely slow because of aim stickiness even as a Jedi, ships are very sluggish to control (and I think using the tow cable to bring down an AT-AT is flat-out impossible unless you max out the X-axis sensitivity), and it just feels wrong as a longtime console player of the Battlefront games.
i hope a patch can make it better
😂 skill issue. I had a 48 k/d ratio on the ps2 as a kid
I'm glad I'm not the only person who thinks the old gen controls felt better. I expect dated controls, but I don't recall the controls on Playstation 2 being this clunky.
@@definitelyahumannotabot Did you even read the comment? It said on ps5 not ps2
Go back and play on ps2. The controls were clunky and the aim was horrible. We tend to look back on our youth with rose tinted glasses. This new version single player plays exactly as it did on oh Xbox and ps2. Now online that’s a different story.
Only reason I see to buy is for PlayStation and Switch. I can play the old version of the games for cheaper. If the multiplayer doesn’t work then why get it. The old version even gets the hero’s and maps for Xbox. It even has a slight graphics update
BF2(2017) is the best and they need revive it by releasing new content. That game still looks graphically beautiful to me and runs great. It’s a damn shame they stopped supporting it
Amazing how many companies are missing open goals and easy money by simply making functional games like Fallen Order.
I fell for all the hype. I never got to experience this game as a kid, and wanted to see what everyone was talking about. Over the past few days, I’ve still played EA/Dice’s Battlefront 2 more. I’m just more used to the gameplay and mechanics, and just haven’t been able to adjust to the old games. The current one is just more enjoyable to me.
Current one is way better. I don’t know why it’s gets all the hate. I think it’s fun and graphics are awesome
@@nate1mizzouGot justified hate at launch. In fact, they had to apologise. After that, it was quite fun to play.
@@nate1mizzou Same here man. I don’t get it.
New one has better graphics and gunplay but it is missing galactic conquest!!
I wish the new games had galactic conquest singleplayer mode. That was my JAM
It's the exact same game but it costs more are people really buying this? I checked it's $15 cheaper to buy both the classic games separately
They have better textures and refined mechanics. But yes I think the price is a bit much. Ogs are still amazing but this game is great in my opinion.
Nevermind this train wreck of a release and the eventual release of the open world SW game that has no Jedi/Sith. Why not make an inFamous style game in the Star Wars universe where your morality scale leads you to be a Jedi or Sith depending on your decisions/actions.
As a Xbox player, On launch multiplayer was completely unplayable during launch but its playing a lot smoother right now with over a dozen dedicated servers as of now and me and my brother were able to join each other in our own lobby as well if that helps anyone. They also raised the original 100 reinforcement count to 350 most likely because they realized the matches were going way too fast
Yeaaah i think i want a refund.... The only reason I bought it was for the online play as I have the originals...... If I wanted to play galactic conquest or instant action, I've already got that and it works perfect.😅
If you spent 30 dollars just to play online….. that’s a yikes, you should dip into single player. They added a few more vehicles to maps, it plays very smooth. Kinda shitty y’all are hating on a 20 year old game just for online………. Kinda dumb tbfh
@@kwisniew99 multiplayer was the main selling point gtfoh
bibe cares
@@kwisniew99
Hard cope take incoming
-This game is fun with friends.
Any game is fun with friends which is why Battlefront (2017) exist and so do other multiplayer, coop, and singleplayer titles exist.
@@emperorstar1250 exactly
Aspyer should be banned from working on Star Wars games. They are clearly incompetent.
Why is he saying "everyone", like every person in existence only bought the game for multiplayer? It is NOT the reason I bought the game.
majority of people bought it for the multiplayer. the story mode could be played on the original pc/ps1 version which can pretty much run on any potato laptop
Same here, I really could care less about multiplayer from a 20 year old game. The MP was jank and unbalanced even back then.
@@Misguided97 no it wasn't on PC
THANK YOU LMAO at least you arnt as stupid as everyone else lmao
@@NoCluYTyeah but classic collection is so much more refined and actually better on pc, if I played the originals I have to literally change my dpi on my pc so I don’t 360 just by moving my mouse a centimeter
This collection is gonna break Actmans heart, such a horrible buggy, glitchy collection, it looks so bad, worse than the original games. No reason to get this collection on xbox or pc, as you had the original games on those platforms. The pc versions of the original games already had multiplayer support from 2017 onwards, and people still play it alot.
#notmybattlefront
should have just overhauled new graphics on it and taken their time. Yes the look takes you back, but tbh with what we have now they could have charged more with better graphics and a WORKING game upon release.
It’s also horrible on at least ps5, the controller sensitivity is awful, there’s no deadzone, and it just feels like actually horrible to aim, and that’s also because it doesn’t seem to have aim down sensitivity it seems to be the same which is just awful.
The game was always like that on PS2, idk why you’re surprised. It was always clunky but it’s still so fun
Skill issue. I had a 48 k/d ratio on the ps2😂😂😂😂
I was about to call you out, but I recall the originals not being clunky on the PS2. I expected dated controls, but not like whats happening on in the collection.
Go back and play ps2. I just did. Almost same controls as ps5 is exhibiting. You’re thinking back on nostalgia, not facts. The original controls were clunky on ps2. Aiming and hitting anything was difficult and had a learning curve. The problem is most gamers have so many options to help them aim in current gen games that they have gone soft.
The Switch port is running very well in MY experience, but on the PS5 version I only experienced the hit detection problem together with some other minor issues, is bad, but I dont think its unplayable...
A lot of channels only care about the multiplayer aspect, which predictably was a disaster as almost every game has multiplayer bad at launch anymore.
Really, they rushed it especially considering they made it available for every current gaming console PLUS PC. That is a lot. Maybe because I am generally not into Star Wars gaming and this is mostly a nostalgia buy for me and I only play offline, but I think it’s worth the money especially if you don’t have the old games anymore. It’s 2 classic games, with significantly better lighting and improved graphics and frame rate. (Let’s be real about a third of the maps in the original games, at least on the old consoles, we’re unplayable because you couldn’t see anything).
Playing on PS5 it's below average. Battlefront 1 runs well, but Battlefront 2's performance is abysmal.
@@charliegriffey7773 biggest problem for pc would be that they dont added an anti-cheat or account-id system so even IF it would run good - it would been flooded by hackers after 2 days anyway & die instantly
@@emperorstar1250 Even offline?
@@Jdb63 controls feel more clunky than I remember. Even changing my sensitivity setting it feels janky
The bugs in some of the maps in offline mode are awful, takes me out of the battlefront experience
Star Wars Battlefront II (2017), outside of its pay to win release, was built from the ground up and had a stable release and was fully playable and IS a fun casual game. 2017's Battlefront was also built from the ground up, which makes the Battlefront Collection even more unacceptable in the state that Aspiyr launched these remasters in. I play on PS5, and from my experience playing the collection, the matchmaking at times crashes the application, and when I did get in matches there was bad netcode and latency between players. In the collection, Battlefront 1 runs ok, but Battlefront 2 was not optimized at all for its multiplayer.
Someone tell me how Rise of the Empire and how it runs on 2 players, as I have yet to play it.
The Battlefront Collection was suppose to be this golden opportunity to give console players the chance to play the multiplayer that many of us were not able to if you played on PS2.
Half of the 501st Journals from BF2 are gone.
The end mission cutscene/journal? Gone.
@@dementiastouch5057 Nooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!
@@emperorstar1250 exactly how I felt about it
Thats garbage smh @@dementiastouch5057
I told y’all. I got hated on but I was right. It’s an old game from 2005 and it’s garbage.
I'll never understand why they had their hopes up for this shit when it was clearly nostalgia bait and easy money for them. SW fans nowadays are suffering from brainrot fr.
On PC the sensitivity is terrible super slow. For me that alone makes it unplayable. The story campaign half of the cutscene are not showing 😂 SMH. I had fun because the game is a masterpiece but my god these bugs are insane. We are in 2024 not 1800s 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ BTW Aspyr responded they said they are working on the gsme to fix it
I feel like more people are playing bf2 some games are left to be untouched with this disaster off a copy paste port… (I like how on bf2 now u actually have good teammates heroes vs villains)
Also, why did they remove the option of inverting y axis for console???
Thats my issue I play inverted and now I can't even play wtf. The biggest let down of all time
I would like to point out that they also botched the single player because all of the victory cutscenes are just missing. I have to say after playing the original two games before this came out, they are fantastic game that work great. This collection broke both games and made them run worse and Hoth XL has a cavalcade of graphical issues on Instant Action.
Don't forget the half of the 501st Journals are gone.
Imagine if they put the time and resources they used on this into Battlefront 2 (2017)
So like one map, cause that’s how much this would have cost to do.
Shows how incompetent devs have become. They can’t even handle a 20 year old game with the technology we have In gaming now
I refunded my PC copy. If they fix the multiplayer and it still has a solid playerbase in a few months, I'll pick it up again. but I'd rather just buy something that works during the steam sale
Forget the multiplayer. The biggest crime they made was changing the loading screen sound for the OG battlefront
Whoever has an xbox install EA's battlefront 2 the galatic conquest has been alive for 2 days straight we just need more to get supremacy back up and running
Played online on ps5, the games are incredibly short, no aim assist whatsoever but those are minor. I played single player galactic conquest for no more then 2 full games before the game crashed twice. When the game didn’t crash my ship completely disappeared while the cpu moved around the map in circles never landing on a planet to start another match. I loved these growing up and I’m torn on getting a refund due to the hoops I’d have to jump through to get one as well as holding out on hoping it gets fixed……..2/10 easy, damn shame
They matches are longer now they changed from 100 lives each team to 350 and there's no aim assist on in multiplayer cause if aim assist was on you would just lock on to every enemy each gun fight cause the old battlefronts have way too much aim assist when it's on
I'm on PS5 & it's a broken unplayable mess even in offline single player.
In SWBF2 I couldn't even aim at max sensitivity cause it's way too slow along with an extreme amount of glitches.
Still trying to get refund.
Got my money’s worth on PS5. Already finished the campaigns and will now play Bespin Platforms for the rest of my life when I’m bored.
Multiplayer on Xbox is pretty laggy for me, some players just like teleporting everywhere. Single player is fun though
Same on PS5.
This was just a money grab. $45 for one solid game that you can buy for $15 on Xbox one, and one kind of decent game but no added content. So stupid. “Buy our $600 console so you can replace all of your games for $90 a piece and then when you complain we’ll give you a 20 year old game with slightly better graphics for $50”
I played it on my ps5 and it’s a disaster. Can’t get multiplayer to work, often freezes in the menu.. I last maybe 2 matches before the game freezes and I’m either booted from the game or I have to force quit the game myself due to more freezing. Not to mention each match lasts like 3 minutes. The missing cutscenes are outrageous. The audio problems also piss me off. I can’t hear the in-game announcers because they’re so quiet and the aiming feels so sticky and weird it’s so difficult to play. I’m honestly shocked with how bad this game is. I didn’t think it was possible to make a 2005 game worse in 2024.
Seems to be an issue on console, from what I’ve heard pc and switch are fine. As for servers they’ll get to that. Kinda shitty to hate on a game that just came out there will be bugs like in every game that’s came out in a span of 2 years. I havnt got any of the crashes or bugs. I would pay money to see you remaster a game and have working servers. So why y’all bitching like they won’t fix it
@@kwisniew99imagine reading that no one gets half of Halo CEs cutscenes just simply because. Then you say they're bitching over it lmao. How much further can you take their cock down your throat?
@@kwisniew99who tf expects to pay for something that doesn't work? Wtf are you talking about? I bought the game to find out you can't play inverted. Wtf is that about? I've been gaming my whole life I can't change 20 years of muscle memory I have to play inverted. In all my years I've never had this happen to me before in any game. It was in the original games too obviously and they took it out. The game is all the way bad I want my money back.
@@reggiestockton8166 c-c-c-COPPEEEEE
@@reggiestockton8166 everything works fine for me. Besides online sometimes…. Seems like you need a massive glass of cope
The balance update on the Xbox version is a disappointment for me. The nerfed starfighters are not welcome. Removing the x wing from plains and making it nerfed was a bad call.
At least on Nintendo Switch, the ping was just terrible.
Everyone is jumping around and freezing.
I love how it's available on newer consoles, but I could never even think about purchasing for PC.
Battlefront has the chance of being the greatest AAA FPS game ever. But its like every company is afraid of the challenge. Somehow there needs to be a translation of these classics into BF2 (2017), which ended being good but could’ve been even better.
I hope the devs fix these issues, as of now they’re just disrespecting these 2 absolutely iconic games.
Please represent us Split Screen enjoyers! I had my siblings over to play this with me, and we couldn't make it work. Not only is it limited to 2-Player Split Screen, but we weren't even able to sign in a second player on XB1. WE NEED 4 PLAYER SPLIT SCREEN! IT ISN'T ROCKET SCIENCE.
Video starts at 1:20
thank you.
In my opinion, I think this is ridiculous. I understand that we expect games to be polished and work correctly at launch. However now-a-days, the bar is set so high and expectations are so exponential, that we don't give things a chance, even if the launch of something is a little rough. The game hasn't been out a WEEK YET! I feel it is extremely premature to judge this product so early. A game is either praised, or shit on. If something is not quite right, "This game is horrible". When they fix it, "Well they should have done this in the first place". There seems to be no winning, or even acknowledgement when things get fixed. Let me know if you agree.
Believe it or not, people are pretty fucking sick and tired of being sold a broken product with the vague promise of "oh b-b-but they'll fix it later!"
Expecting a functioning product, especially when said product is a port of two games from *20 years ago,* shouldn't be too much to ask for.
Stop making excuses for this shit. You're part of the problem.
People aren’t judging a game because “it’s early”. They chose to release it and charge full price. The bare minimum expectation is that the game works, and it doesn’t. Don’t make excuses for companies screwing you over.
We should have gotten actual remakes of these games. Even if this release worked perfectly it doesn't change the fact that these games are still very old and outdated. We need Battlefront 3!
Sony won't give us refunds on PS5. I guess this game isn't considered faulty when the developer came out and said it's broken
With the BF2 (2017) launch and Kotor remake debacle I was not going to preorder or buy this at launch anyways. But when this didn’t even seem to be a proper remaster either, I had really low expectations. I expected some ruff edges in multiplayer 64 player lobbies on Switch cause it’s Switch. I also expect small or no changes to the outdated controls and hit boxes. They still managed to even under deliver on those expectation with multiplayer being trash across all platforms 😢.
I can’t even get into the game at first anyway! It’s so frustrating cause I bought this for $30! As long I can play soon, I’ll be happy. 😮
Joining games was tough, but I got in a 64 player game that had the reinforcements up to 350 and had a blast playing lag wasn't bad. My friends couldn't join me though, their screens would time out. They ended up in other servers and gave up trying to join me. Yes some servers have the tickets way to low. You can tell people that never played the game set a lot of the aspyer servers up. The map orders were running same map back to back different eras. Which is the idiotic thing the 2018 BF2 servers do too. No one wants to play the same map twice in a row ever.
I bought the game on Xbox series S primarily for the multiplayer as I imagine most of everyone who owns the originals did. And the multiplayer does not work. The game crashes when looking for a lobby. Refunded the game today. Hope this didn’t happen with anyone else
Just play single player ?
@@kwisniew99 exactly. I already have that on the OGs. Their cheaper, not a million gigabytes, it’s alright
@@StarWarsHour I get that but og’s are un optimized for pc hence why I got the remaster. People are literally just buying the game for online….. that makes me sick. I get that the ogs still exist. BUT THEY JUST REVAMPED A 20 YEAR OLD GAME. It’s a shame seeing all these idiots pay 35 dollars just for online. I bet you these people pay for the same cod every year too.
@@StarWarsHour I also agree that 62 gigs is insane for both games into one. See again valid reasons are great the people bitching about the multiplayer and only that make me sick
@@kwisniew99lmfao “guys stop complaining just eat around the shit I promise you the candy in the middle tastes great!” That’s your logic buddy
I knew y’all was gonna complain as soon as this game come out… what happened to all that hype….
The game is a mess on PS5. The sensitivity is all over the place and its so hard to aim. Its not like this on the old version i play on xbox
It’s pretty good on console the multiplayer at least I was playing bf1 and only experienced some weird stuff on geonosis and only when rolling
Droidekas, transform and roll out.
I don't understand why people still preorder games, things seem to go wrong half of the time, last time I got a game on release was Halo 5
The XL mode impressed me. The amount of bots onscreen do turn any session into the large-scale, chaotic, all-out wars that you can't even experience on the newer Battlefronts!
In all my childhood, playing battlefront 2 on PS2 was the most fun I’ve had. I never had multiplayer besides screen split whenever I have a friend over. I’m always a single player kind of guy and wanted to feel nostalgic. But if they say this game has issues to play. Then I can wait when they fix it.
This is my experience as well, but my nostalgia mostly lies with playing Battlefront I on the OG Xbox as a kid. Also, I can’t really justify buying it in its current state considering the asking price and the cost of living rn.
Or get the original games. No need to wait.
They are actually reading all the feedback. Whether negative or positive, the truth is they sacrifice this remake to generally measuring the public opinion about: if it is worth to invest on Battlefront 3, when it's worth and how?
How thirsty are the BF fans for a new and huge BF game and etc.
They already knew that this lunch and this remake of a 20-year-old game could be a disappointment but what they in 2nd or 3d layers want are the thirst for new BF. These are all vulnerable data to help them for the -probably- Battlefront 3.
They could've just made a good game and they wouldn't have so much feedback to go through.
@@coltonwilkie241 yes, but even small negativ feedback will help them for their next projects. What i heard was the consol versions were good mades. It's all cost-benefit analysis for the future with a small risk and small attempt.
I almost bought this. My procrastination actually worked in my favor for once.
Game crashes on console, don't even talk about the bugs
Wait so u can’t even play with these people if u had the old game? YEAH HUGE L 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 STAR WARS IS RESTING IN PISS
Bro the game just came out there will be issues. Y’all mfs just need to cope you think they arnt gonna fix it ? Children these days….. shame shame
@@kwisniew99 nah I’m just not falling for the SCAM buddy 🤣 I’ve bought this game on the ps2, when I had a ps3, and on Pc and then they go and make a “new” version which don’t even work and the people who bought the game before cant connect that is sad af 😭 but of course leave it to “yes” boys like you who buy everything they drop bc of nostalgia or content gimme a break ur the kid here
@@kwisniew99 and I played the game since 2005 I’m a true OG and will stomp u on it on my mama
@@thetricky5569 lmao you sir need a massive glass of cope what scam? Yes I think 35 is outrageous and the amount of gigs is insane. They’ve revamped mechanics and textures. Literally just online that dosnt work, oh I get it now you probably buy the same cod every year don’t you?
Lmao by not work you mean online ?! Lmao SO YOU PAID 35 DOLLARS JJST FOR ONLIME ?!?!!?!!!!! LMAOOOO YIKESSSSSS feel bad for your wallet lil bro
I can't even spawn on battlefront 2 the count down stops at 1.
People can still mod the old release and provide servers
I play on console and I refunded it already😂😂😂 what a joke. Don’t know why every game company slacks on making battle front games. It’s an automatic money maker if made right and this rerelease proves that it will make money. Spending $40 on a game that came out roughly 20 years ago and thousands doing the same proves my point. I hope Star Wars battlefront gets the love it deserves.
There’s a weird controller bug on BF2 that makes my controller drift and its definitely the game because it doesn’t happen on the original version
I played the original bf2 as a kid, but never got to play it online on official servers. I do not feel cheated, and the multiplayer does work, just not very well. I think they should fix the multiplayer, and possibly adjust the mechanics around aiming because it feels too dated. I dont remember it (the aim mechanics) being that bad on ps2. The way they are now with zero aim assist in dedicated servers makes it impossible to reliably aim. I am a little surprised that mouse and keyboard support was not an option for consoles either. Crossplay would be dope, but unless they smooth out the acceleration curve on controller theres no way crossplay with consoles vs pc would be playable.
What if the games weren’t that good in the first place? Thats how I felt going back to them
I’m a single player type of guy but I noticed the ai’s act smarter in the classic collection than in the older ones. I was so excited to try the online for the first time because I was to interested in the single player, so since online is us playable it’s just unfortunate and why why why. I play on Xbox series x and my single player games get buggy especially on galactic conquest attacked a planet won and it was still red. Please please fix game I love love Star Wars battlefront.
My experience on Xbox has been great. All this hate is being blown out of proportion
There’s only 3 things I’d change:
Increase the ticket count from 100 to 250 (BF2)
Disable friendly fire
Disable friendly force push
(This one is a problem, I’ve been thrown around repeatedly by teammates and it sucks) I’m also aware there’s a kick system but I don’t know how to vote yes so if you find out please comment
The ticket count has already been changed to 350
Wait till you get game crashes on console...
Most well polished Aspyr project
Yeah, but at least cheat codes on BF2 work, but unfortunately you’re gonna have to do it every battle
My idea is that Aspyr (love their other ports mostly) was used to their other Star Wars games having a grand total of 20 dudes on discord playing it and didn't think they'd need the server space
How did this happen? This was supposed to be a win for battlefront but it’s just another loss.
Is the game worth it? Depends on what you want to get out of it, but for Switch and PlayStation it strikes me as a solid purchase. Xbox and PC I would wait to see if the online gets fixed.
I got this for Switch and am very happy with my purchase. The online hasn’t been great, but that’s only a small part of why I wanted to get it for Switch
No
@@majorgear1021😂 ok, I guess I’m not allowed to have my own opinions from my own experiences
I literally cannot aim on controller.
Why not remake the remakes, and make them not suck and remove all the micro transactions? I know it's difficult saying no to robbing your costumers, but maybe you'd get some new ones if you did?
One the micro transactions have been gone for years. 2 that EA isn’t in charge of this.
I’ll play it still because it would be nice to have this on switch so I can play on the go
The newest battlefront 2 isnt dead. It always puts you in a game full of people and if not then the lobby fills up alwayssss.
Should have known it was going to be garbage when I saw that it was 20% off for the preorder
Star Wars outlaws is our only hope.
It’s already a failure. Unfortunately
they copied blizzard with wow classic. and completely failed
Oh boy, on console it’s definitely a scam. Honestly if the hit detection worked a little better and better ping it might be more fun but damn. Its just too buggy.
Dude, I'm dying to know what's with the bloat of space this game is taking up for?? I've been hearing it's 60-70 GB on PC.
Holy shit this collection was released in a shitty state (once again).
It seems that most publishers never learn anything. 😡
So this is the MCC disaster for Star Wars fans. Kinda bummed about this one because i definitely want to play this as I never got to experience classic battlefront.
What I can't get over is how it's 70 friggin GB. It's a 20 year old game, how on earth is it that size??
Used the movie cutscenes from bluray.
The nostalgia doesn’t even do it for me. The game is just kinda shitty