What if The English Speaking Countries United?
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 08. 2024
- What if The English Speaking Countries United?
Imagine a world where countries like the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and other English-speaking nations join forces to create a unified body. This union could have far-reaching consequences in areas such as politics, economics, culture, and global influence.
From a political standpoint, a united English-speaking front could lead to greater diplomatic coordination and collaboration on shared interests. It may involve the formation of a unified governance structure, allowing member countries to pool their resources, expertise, and influence on the global stage. The potential benefits could include enhanced collective security, increased cooperation on global issues, and a stronger voice in international affairs.
Economically, the unity of English-speaking nations could foster closer trade ties, creating a vast economic bloc. Such a union may facilitate the free movement of goods, services, and labor among member countries, leading to increased economic integration and potentially boosting the overall prosperity of the united entity. Additionally, it could enable joint initiatives in research, innovation, and technology, further enhancing economic growth and competitiveness.
The cultural impact of a united English-speaking front would be profound. It would provide a platform for sharing and celebrating the diverse cultural heritage and contributions of member nations. The exchange of ideas, arts, literature, and traditions could flourish within this united entity, promoting cultural understanding, appreciation, and unity among English-speaking peoples worldwide.
While the idea of a united English-speaking front holds promise, it also presents challenges. Differences in governance systems, policies, and priorities among member nations would need to be carefully navigated. Maintaining the distinct identities and autonomy of member countries while working towards common goals would require skillful diplomacy and effective decision-making processes.
I wasn't financial free until my 40’s and I’m still in my 40’s, bought my third house already, earn on a monthly through passive income, and got 4 out of 5 goals, just hope it encourages someone that it doesn’t matter if you don’t have any of them right now, you can start TODAY regardless your age INVEST and change your future! Investing in the financial market is a grand choice I made.
Even with the right technique and assets some investors would still make more than others, as an investor, you should’ve known that by now, nothing beats experience and that’s final, personally I had to reach out to a stock expert for guidance which is how I was able to grow my account close to a million, withdraw my profit right before the correction and now I’m buying again
@jamiu7The adviser I'm in touch with is ' Jayden Nadav Bishopson" He works with Merrill, Pierce, Smith incorporated and interviewed on CNBC Television. You can use something else. for me his strategy works hence my result. he provides entry and exit point for the securities I focus on.
He appears to be well-educated and well-read. I ran a search on his name and came across his website; thank you for sharing.
The Brits and the USA would be asking fire and water to get along.
So basicly canzuk but with ireland and usa as well
No Canzuk is only 4 countries lol
@@voided9593 i know that's why I said canzuk as well as Ireland and USA
@@ivanhardy-birt1124 India,Nigeria,Papua New Guinea, South Africa,Sudan,South Sudan, Pakistan, and more aren’t part of CANZUK.Your saying it like all of these countries haven’t gotten independence
@@voided9593they are independent, but this video mostly talks about the six countries without mentioning others like India or Papua new Guinea
@@ivanhardy-birt1124 Oh okay
Very interesting video
Glad you liked it
Nice idea, but corruption, is a big problem, trust is at a low at the moment, safe guards on speech and freedom's need to be sorted, at the moment the state is taking over, and who would want a bigger more powerful one.
No? Yall overcomplicate things. Everything will basically be the same. Just that people will see those countries united as one.
@@nathanielpettersen2560 I stick with my original statement, the mess the world is in, is because too much power is centered in one place, uniting English speaking countries would give more power, it's not good for ordinary people. Better a multi poler world, so we learn from each others mistakes, instead of hiding them or profiting out of them.
I would have included Belize
As a brit, if this involved giving up American gun rights, I'd vote against it. As far as I'm concerned, the 2nd amendment is the canary in the coal mine
What do you mean?
As an American i would not be for a Union at this time because i believe America would be dealt with most of the economic burden while the rest of the countries would basically be freeloading while trying to change our culture among other things. Thats my basic opinion without typing a 3 page long explanation lol!
What? The culture stays the same at those places. And even so the american culture is so small and are originally from european culture so😂
I seek for Canada to join the us eventually
The other angle to that is the citizens of the other countries I would suspect would be vehemently opposed to having economic policy for all of them essentially dictated to them from Washington, essentially giving up their sovereignty and freedom.
What culture would they change? America already has really close cultures to them. Scared of America having Canadian maple syrup?
the internet has homogenised us at this point. May as well make it official
We can but daydream.
underrated
There will be no unification. Because it is in the western interest not other countries. Uniting countries based on England colonial past is like trying to revive the colonial dominance.
Yeah it’s not likely. I mean as of rn the US is technically the leader and has a much greater influence over world than it would have in this scenario. I mean in the long run I think a greater union of English peoples wouldn’t be bad but America is such a powerhouse it would be hard not to see the US not overwhelming the other countries. And many Americans would be opposed to any lack of American dominance. In other words you’d need a very different America and probably UK. Most Americans if they don’t think the US gained its independence from West Korea or France just think of the British Monarchy in the terms of Braveheart and the Patriot and assume the British are just slightly oppressed people unable to completely throw off tyranny. They don’t tend to understand that English speaking countries are very similar in structure, and heck outside of the revolution and 1812 and some minor unnecessary tensions we’ve wound up fighting with the British more than not. But Americans tend to have a ridiculous superiority complex that having met people from the other countries in question don’t tend to have. As an American I’d love a greater Union for sure but as unpatriotic as it sounds I think America would be ironically the tyrant and dominant power of such a union. Cause we are the prideful, imposing, can’t get off our high horse member of the English family that the British may have been in the 19th and 20th centuries. An equal confederation would be cool but I doubt it would happen. Then on top of US dominance would be the problem of US politics and I wouldn’t wish that on America’s worst enemies. Like if America was a person we’d basically be the by polar neighbor that owns a ton of Guns. Except we’re a country that owns half the world’s nukes.