You are not saved by having a certain Bible translation on your lap, you’re saved by trusting the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ which was shed for your sins.
A man of commonsense which is becoming rare in these days. I have read the KJV and Geneva bible and the NKJV and NASB and Living bible and l prefer the latter translations.
One may want to check into Brandon Peterson, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist -- people say numbers don't lie ... Brandon has a lot of free resources that proves the point that he shares with the World.
One may want to check into Brandon Peterson, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics, not even Geneva: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist -- people say numbers don't lie ... Brandon has a lot of free resources that proves the point that he shares with the World. God's hand was on the KJV, no doubt.
@@TexasHoosier3118the siniaticus claims to be over 1000 years old but as one noted scholar remarked- its appearance looked too pristine. There are many references in older church father wtitings which show the Textus Receptus version includes many if not all of the omitted passages in Akexandrian and Siniaticus. Ergo Alexandrian texts have been proven to be corrupted
I don’t think the King James Bible is corrupted, though he was displeased reading the notes of the Geneva Bible. He authorized a translation of the holy Bible from the original tongues and he compared former translations along with the 1560 Geneva version
I was amazed at the Geneva bible being the first study bible. It wasn't until 1901, I think, when Schofield did a study bible. I need to rewatch the video where I saw this.
The king James did not like the Geneva calling out tyrants are not of God. Schofield bibles were a vessel for Satan. Geneva also has original texts unlike the freemason king James who changed the word of God and moving the scriptures around using numbers.... SATANIC.
@@johnpearce3714 Ya might want to compare 1 John 3:9 in the amplified spin. "No one who is born of God (deliberately, knowingly, and habitually) practices sin" 1 John 3:9 KJV Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. So, you honestly don't see any difference there? Do you want a Jesus that keeps you from "committing rape", for example, or from "habitually practicing rape"? Do You want your friends to have the Jesus of the KJV that keeps them from EVER committing adultery with YOUR wife.... Or the jesus of the amplified, that keeps them from (knowingly willingly habitually practicing) committing adultery with YOUR wife? How about a Jesus of the KJV, that keeps men from ever committing murder,...or The jesus of the amplified, that keeps men from (knowingly, willingly, habitually, practicing the SIN of murdering YOUR closest family & friends.
God is perfect, which means his word is perfect. His words have made it to humans, and we have written them down. If his words are perfect, there will be a perfect bible. KJV is currently closest to God's perfect word. There is a multitude of comparison examples that show the modern bibles to have blasphemy and heresy. Satan literally created a "New" KJV that is not a direct translation and tries to steer people away from true salvation. Your salvation IS your translation! Look up, Pastor Gene Kim, and thank me later. ❤
So long story short, the Geneva Bible help you out in understanding the Scriptures which went against king James agenda so they rejected the Geneva Bible, and translated the king James, the way that they thought it should be translated based on their agenda in their thoughts and opinions
You're trying to sell the people the other one because it's from the Catholic Virgin and not the two testament that God wants us to read The Catholic there's no such thing as Portuguese and drunk like that trust the King James it's the only Bible that God wants us to have for now he authorized it and that's good bless you in Jesus name Amen 🙏💖🙏
In my last video I show that the King James ruins the prophecy of Daniel chapter 8 because verse 26 has evening and morning in the definite article in the Hebrew and it's also singular. And it's the same in the King James. But this creates a problem because where was the prophecy of the single evening and the single morning and the entire chapter?
Thank you Jesus, this integrity syndicate, just confirmed for the thousands time, how precious my King James Bible is. Thank you, my LORD and SAVIOR. All hail KING JESUS. AMEN
A LOT of people have gotten converted over the years using the King James Version Bible. The authors of this video are "oneness" "Jesus Only" people, but if there is no Trinity why did Jesus Christ pray to His Father on several occasions?
A lot of people have also went to hell because false teachers, preachers dont know how to rightly divide scripture, and lead people astray. Satan is crafty. Religion is all the different ways to go to hell. 1 Cor.15:1-4 is the Gospel of our Salvation and Ephesians 1:10-14 is our assurance. Jesus didn’t say “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only son, that whosoever joins a church, pays tithes, gets baptised, does good works, adds to the finished work of the cross, and believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life”.
Funny question. If I am not my father and mother, then why do I talk to my father on the phone on several occasions? Because I am not my father,. Otherwise, I would talk to myself.
@@mrg466You will one day regret this. I hope and pray you find peace within yourself and ask Jesus to show you who he really is. There’s one thing for certain, every single atheist who took their very last breath no longer became an atheist once it’s too late to repent
@@henrylaurel1188 I'm certainly not going to read modern fake New Age Bibles, it's not just the KJV 1611 good Bible, but all of them that are translated from the same Texas Receptus accepted source
KJV is good, but not perfect. More than once Young's Literal Translation, which is also from the Textus Receptus, is clearer in presenting the deity of Christ. See below. 2 Thessalonians 1:12 YLT- that the name of our Lord Jesus Christ may be glorified in you, and ye in him, according to the grace of our God and Lord Jesus Christ. KJV- That the name of our Lord Jesus Christ may be glorified in you, and ye in him, according to the grace of our God and the Lord Jesus Christ. KJV adds "the", separated "our God" from "Lord Jesus Christ". Titus 2:13 YLT- waiting for the blessed hope and manifestation of the glory of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ, KJV- Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ KJV is unclear, but Young's is unmistakable: Jeus is here called "great God". 2 Peter 1:1 YLT- Simeon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to those who did obtain a like precious faith with us in the righteousness of our God and Saviour Jesus Christ KJV- Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to them that have obtained like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ Once again, Young's is clear, but KJV is clouding a clear sound-off for the deity of Jesus. Christ is here called "our God and Saviour". Jude 4 YLT- for there did come in unobserved certain men, long ago having been written beforehand to this judgment, impious, the grace of our God perverting to lasciviousness, and our only Master, God, and Lord -- Jesus Christ -- denying KJV- For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ Young's, for a fourth time, rightly translated the passage so as the reflect the Godhood of our Lord Jesus. KJV is obsolete. If ya have to have the TR, that's ok. But there's better out there than KJV.
Speaking as an atheist, with no dog in the fight, so to speak, of course the KJV is not corrupt. That's just ridiculous. It bears the mark of its authors and the authority under which they worked but so does every bible ever translated. Some modern bibles are closer to the original manuscripts simply because we have discovered earlier copies since the KJV was created but we do not have the 'originals' of any book of the bible and so 100% accuracy is not possible.
The preface of the translator's are missing in many kjv bibles. They admitted that its not the perfect version. They lauded other previous translations.
One may want to check out Brandon Peterson, who has proved through English numerics that the KJV is indeed God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist
Truly this contested subject should have ended long, long ago. Instead the debate endures when the answer to it was declared long, long ago. Think about it !! In just about all of our ecclesiastical doctrinal statement's - ( Church manual's ) - the concept of inerrancy of the "Scripture" is addressed. This statement is declared something to this effect. " We believe the original "manuscripts" were inerrant in their conception." The corresponding action to this in our time presents itself as no less a task. This is not to say perverted or corrupted translation's do not exist, and such a mind set in this hour seems popular and tempting as marketing exists today. Yet, thankfully "God" has declared that "HIS" Word" will forever be preserved eternally. So it is my contention that the mature among the "Body of Christ" be accountable here. We have been given a sound mind and mouth to counsel concerning this. It is us that has been charged with the responsibility of discipleship. Experience and reasoning with one another will go along way in settling this "hodge-podge" issue, remember a contentious spirit remains where it is at. With "God'' maintaining "HIS" Word, and with a rating of around 98 percent agreement between the "Text's," we should have be less saber rattling and truly be more grateful for what we have. We are so blessed as many of our believing family member's around the world are fortunate to own 1 page of "Holy Writing." We must never forget this "spirit-realm- reality. "Grace is "Gods ability and willingness to do for us what we cannot do for ourselves. Therefore grace never leaves us where it found us."
e-sword has 1611kjv and 1587geneva combine with regular kjv+ with strongs dictionary... that is what i like, and throw in the ESV to for a laugh.. e-sword also has the Geneva notes in the commentary section, it is possible to use the KJV and have the Geneva notes with it.
The Apostle Paul - Mentions the Way of Salvation Paul did not detest the Law of Moses. Paul actually believed in The Law, but did not understand that God was going to bring in the grace. It had to first be a sacrifice - and that sacrifice was Jesus Christ. Paul did not detest The Law but quoted from Moses and explained what Moses could not explain back then, because it wasn't time yet. Moses means "drawn out" - and God used Moses to 'draw out' Israel from Egypt. The Hebrews spent scores of years in Egypt, and it was time to move on. The word 'Church' means "Called Out" - by Christ, the Church was called out of the world to make a people for God. In the epistles written by Paul, especially Romans and Galatians he explained the purpose of the church. In The Law in Deuteronomy 32 - God had Moses teach Joshua and the Children of Israel a song. This song was going to attest what the Children of Israel was going to do, including turning their back on God. But... in the end, God would bring Israel back. In that chapter, the Church was foretold due to Israel's idolatry which caused jealousy from God. For that reason God used a people that were not a people to cause Israel to jealousy. The Apostle Paul explains this in Romans 9, 10, and 11. Acts 13:38,39 38 Be it known unto you therefore, men and brethren, that through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins: 39 And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.
This video is what happens when you don't study the issue enough and you just end up making straw man arguments, hypocritical statements and regurgitating factually incorrect information. I was rather disappointed by some of the claims here....I thought you studied harder than this.
@@JesusNOTreLIEgion I cant be KJV only as I embrace the original languages and I believe while the KJV is the only faithful and accurate translation of the original languages there are nuances in the originals that are not (and maybe cant be) replicated and translated into the English.
@@followintruthlj2865 Since i can not say this any better than you just did , ill simply come in agreement with you , in the form of an AMEN and God bless you in the name of Jesus Christ .
So true. It's sad.that so many are so mentally lost and confused .. that a video as inaccurate as this video. Can confuse them into not reading the KJV :(
The KJV is outdated, and even KJV onlyists pastors don't understand it. The English is too old. There are so many words and phrases that have changed meaning. The only way to understand the KJV is either a) learn Greek and Hebrew or b) £90 subscription to the Oxford Dictionary that includes the 1611 definitions. Modern Websters doesn't have 1611 definitions. It's stupid. Use a modern translation. I ain't joking. 100 KJV onlyists PASTORS, not children, were surveyed, and they did horrible. ONLY 9 pastors answered all the questions correctly. NINE. 9% of KJV Onlyists pastors UNDERSTAND the Word of God. Get your head out of the ground and read a Bible YOU can actually understand.
This man obviously does not believe that any Bible in any language he can show us is now or ever was the complete and 100% true words of God and his video is full of lots of misinformation. The things he criticizes in the KJB are also found in the Geneva bible he mentions so favorably.
@@nobux717Bullinger was a brilliant scholar. His lexicon is a treasure. That he produced so many aids to finding what terms meant in the time they were written without the aid of a computer is impressive.
Very informative. A lot of stress on the Alexandrian family, which is the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus: which of course was preserved by the Popes. Maybe that says enough about that. It does not appear that any translation is perfect but KJV does have advantages over many modern translations. The Geneva 1560 is a even better one in my opinion.
Hello! What do you think about the 1599 edition of the Geneva Bible? do you have experience with it? if so what version would you say is the best, 1560 or 1599? Thanks! Jamie.
Yes, and the Alexandrian family, so few and dubious as it is is quite leavened. Thee KJV has the HS in the very text, study it and see for self. Look at Isaiah 53:8 compare KJV to several other modern versions note contradictory translations. Look up too FROM & PRISON note how Hebrew words here have been translated elsewhere in OT as THROUGH & OPPRESSION; and what does taken from judgment mean- look up Acts 8:33 KJV here compare leavened versions here too. Consider Proverbs 25:2 here carefully, what does He glory in doing?
@@Obediah002Since when was the KJV the standard? Where is the scripture that supports the KJV only teaching? Why would any honest Bible student compare modern translations to the KJV? Would that not be falling for the double standards and lies of the KJV only cult?
"Preserved"??? More hidden and rewritten. If that Vaticanus and Sinaiticus was the "preserved" Word of God: Why don't they agree with each other? One would think if both came from Alexandria (which was gnostic in the region), they wouldn't have all those errors and some see that is was tried to be copied over. Even scholars have no idea the possible origin of the Codex Vaticanus. Why did God allow it to be hidden for so long? That is saying God has mislead Christians for over 1000 years. As far as the one I have been ability to study with the Holy Spirit's leading, KJV by far.
I do not believe the KJV nor the Geneva Bible are corrupt. Both camps who favor one or the other make these accusations. I realize that the KJV was mandated by James for political reasons because he hated the Geneva Bible because of its commentary notes. Both of them are from the TR and somewhat similar, so accusing both translations as being corrupt is ridiculous.
The king James bible and Geneva bible is not just corrupt but also misleading,as a matter of fact the original scriptures were just that scriptures not Latin biblica.These bibles are loaded with pagan words and they do not contain the true Aramaic- Hebrew names of the father and son, but instead is replaced with pagan name jesus-hail zeus, pagan titles Lord-baal and God-Lucifer,history is there for all and you can google some of what I have typed here for yourself,these biblias- Latin were written for Christians Catholics but humanity due to lack of studying the word sctiptures or searching for truth majority followed after Constantine's made up Christian religion and study's from those biblias Latin, instead of the original Aramaic Hebrew version which contains the original writings of the quodeshims (holy ones).This is why only a remnant will be saved, because it only a remnant that will know the truth and be set free from that truth.
@@PETERJOHN101 Nothing personal brother. I respectfully disagree. The Alexandrian manuscripts being corrupt is old accusations by King James or TR onlyists. There is no proof to back those accusations up not when they agree with the TR and Majority Text 94 to 98.5 percent of the time. And where there are textual variants between all three, it changes no doctrine at all.
@@rodneyjackson6181 I have discussed the issue with bible translators and looked carefully at the evidence. The Majority Text agrees better with early Church writings. The Coptic derived Alexandrian codices, once believed to be older, are in fact of a later origin. The Byzantine manuscript also appears to be free of Gnostic influences common to early Egyptian culture.
@@PETERJOHN101 the King James is not from the Majority Text. Its from the Received Text. The Majority and Received Texts are different. There are in fact about 800 differences between the Received Text and the Majority Text. The KJV, NKJV and Geneva are Received Text translations. They are not Majority Text. The things you said about the Alexandrian manuscripts are not factual but King James only misinformation that has been parroted for many years that has already been debunked.
By God's Word - when the time is near the end of this Church Period, things get WORSE, not better. With all of these so-called scholars and theologians, newer and better translations of The Holy Bible are printed. The Word of God is The Word of God. The overall message in God's Word is that the Adam race is a fallen one. This is TRUTH. The answer to that is THE LORD JESUS CHRIST. He paid the price for ALL SINS... Just listen to The Apostle Paul, and believe: The Apostle Paul - Mentions the Way of Salvation Paul did not detest the Law of Moses. Paul actually believed in The Law, but did not understand that God was going to bring in the grace. It had to first be a sacrifice - and that sacrifice was Jesus Christ. Paul did not detest The Law but quoted from Moses and explained what Moses could not explain back then, because it wasn't time yet. Moses means "drawn out" - and God used Moses to 'draw out' Israel from Egypt. The Hebrews spent scores of years in Egypt, and it was time to move on. The word 'Church' means "Called Out" - by Christ, the Church was called out of the world to make a people for God. In the epistles written by Paul, especially Romans and Galatians he explained the purpose of the church. In The Law in Deuteronomy 32 - God had Moses teach Joshua and the Children of Israel a song. This song was going to attest what the Children of Israel was going to do, including turning their back on God. But... in the end, God would bring Israel back. In that chapter, the Church was foretold due to Israel's idolatry which caused jealousy from God. For that reason God used a people that were not a people to cause Israel to jealousy. The Apostle Paul explains this in Romans 9, 10, and 11. Acts 13:38,39 38 Be it known unto you therefore, men and brethren, that through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins: 39 And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.
The facsimiles of the 1611 I have all have marginal notes. The words of the church fathers were also considered which quoted older Greek texts no longer in existence. Humble men do not claim to be anything other than feeble men. History has judged, and the KJV has proven itself better than previous and subsequent versions ("Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them." Matthew 7:20). The apocrypha were separated from the rest of the Old Testament unlike Catholic bibles, which had it mixed in with the Old Testament books, and were later removed completely. The Alexandrian manuscripts themselves were corrupt, and the Bible itself has nothing good to say about Egypt in general, and Alexandria in particular. Easter is the correct word as it is noted that it was the days of unleavened bread, which occur after Passover, so it was already over with, and Easter was coming up. Paul's authorship of Hebrews is confirmed by Peter in 2 Peter 3:15-16: "And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath also written unto you; (the Hebrews, that Peter is also writing to here, which all the Hebrew epistles--Hebrews through Jude are written to.) As also in all his epistles (not just that one), speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction." The AI, or whatever is being used here, can't even pronounce Job (the name) correctly with a long "o" and not the short "o" which means employment. Well we would do to heed the words of God in Isaiah 55:8-9: For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts."
Depends on which manuscript you are looking at. If your Bible goes back to Alexandria you have a corrupt Bible. The KJV stands alone as one that goes back to Antioch
Alexandria where the deity of Christ and the doctrine of trinity was defended. Antioch Arianism was taught. Denying the deity of Christ. Saying he was a created being, like the Jehovah Witnesses
Do you speak Hebrew and Koine Greek? Do you not think Lancelot Andrews and the other scholars didn’t know these and other languages? May The Lord open your eyes sir! Bill. Uk
Would a gay tyrant support Romans 1:16-32 KJV? No! It's more satanic propaganda to discredit the real Bible, which exposes them for who they REALLY are.
All Bible's are "corrupt" unless you can read Hebrew and Greek from the original of the Old Testaments or from the original Greek. Translations are always give and take. No language can be directly translated. Most translators do their best. I use several translations and a Hebrew/Greek interlinear Bible.
king James is in hell? Revelation 22:18-19 I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book
But check into Brandon Peterson's work, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist -- people say numbers don't lie ... Brandon has a lot of free resources that proves the point that he shares with the World.
@@janseendiguiseppiThomasMC Nope, that's a conclusory statement without evidence in support; you have to prove that. You said you had seen Brandon's work, did you see all of it with understanding? i did many years of research with Greek and Hebrew numerics, and only KJV has discernable patterns; NONE of the other versions do, not even NKJV. And Brandon, through the insights given to him, was able to show for this generation God's seal of approval of the true Word of God in English, and not the word of Satan attempting to diminish the effectiveness of God's ordained word of truth and He did it with English this time. Under the Rules of evidence, a conclusory statement without supporting evidence is no evidence at all. Can you cite any works that have those patterns in Hebrew, Greek, and English languages like the KJV has with overwhelming proof that is undisputed? Proof matters, not opinions. Peace be with you ...
Lol it says 666 after the name. That def says a lot. So it's easy for people today to make accusations about something that took place 500 years ago however this is all based on pride and agendas. Know that no version of the Bible has taken this much depth into giving you the best interpretation of the Bible in all history before 1611 or since. Every page had to be agreed upon by over thirty other men that new every language they used to interpret from. Not just Hebrew and Greek. Know that the king had nothing to do with the interpretation aside from bringing the men and transcripts together. Also note the reason was because of the tyrant religion that still exists today but that back then had a strangle hold on the ignorance of the people as they did not have a Bible in thier own language that was well written. The KJV is the only version that puts words in italics so that the reader knows they put those words in to help you understand what's being said more easily. Also the KJV is the only current version not under copyright and in the KJV Bibles you will have letters from the interpreters as well as from the kind himself all stating that the reason they wrote the Bible in English, despite massive oppositions and threats, was so that we the people could know the truth. Don't fall for the lies. God is all powerful all knowing and all present so it is literally impossible for truth not to exist in the world.
Helpful talk very informative,and a good share! That said many of us find the language effective for memorising bible verses. That and the devotion and reverence of the Hampton court scholars,still makes it popular for readers today!
Integrity syndicate ? - In the 15th Century the Geneva format was still in the throws of establishing top left and right english in order to properly navigate the Saintly Clause secret of the " I AM that ( which ) i am ". In the beginning was the verbatim of God, but up through the line of David to the Aaronic Levitical Tribe, the Christ wouldn't take the lower case " t " for the supplication of Simon to preserve the homonym clause until he wed Lady Wisdom at age 33. Martin Luther was the Catalyst for the deaf, dumb, and blind and those fully facilitated with all their senses. But the miracle of prophecy came from the deaf, dumb, and blind cathartic to statues, stained glass, crucifix, and Rosary props that the priests passed the plate and missed the grail on as far as understanding spiritual and physical things and how object should not take precedence over Holy predicated subject. In other words, we can't sell material things to attract a congregation for money, to save our soul...we have to take up our cross, and sell Jesus in ourselves. The name of the Lord is a strong tower:....................................................
WOW!!! I was wondering if you actually listened to the video???? I am thinking not!!!! It completely undermines and brings into question the reliability, accuracy and usefulness of the KJV!! But yeah go ahead and keep right on thinking and believing what is not true.. it is an epidemic in today’s world!
Septuagint LXX is the oldest used around 500 bce - 300 ce (even Jesus used to quote from it) KJV comes from Masoretic texts, 850 ce, which was corrupted by roman pagans.
@@pakaliccyber7433 The Masoretic is in the original Hebrew. The Septuagint would make your Bible a translation of a translation, which makes your Bible useless.
People with dogmas have crazy arguments. I've heard before someone defend the use of the word "Easter" in Acts 12. The defense was something like "The KJV translators were learned men, they knew that Passover has already passed, hence why they translated it as Easter instead".
Actually easter is disguise for the ancient goddess worship of ISHTAR. eggs at Easter arr representative of fertility as those who worshiped idols like fertility gods....the devil perverts God's holidays, his word his everything. HALLOWEEN is evil ND should. Not be celebrated by children especially nor adults. Christmas is focus on money and material goods which was worship of nimrod and just tlike they offer gits to him on or under. Tree , so did many sacrifice their children to idols and "gods"....think about it!!!!!! ND IF YOU HAVENT NOTICED usually August, Sept October leading up to Halloween (devils nigh) there's usually a world wide troubling thing like murder...one year it's chris watts another it's Bryan laundry ...there is some satanic stuff leading up to Halloween...note the patterns of these things and easy to see the evil. But we must be simple concerning evil being wise in Good and God and truth. But we are to be wise of the enemy's tactics with all discernment and prayers 🙏
Easter was a separate pagan holiday celebrated in the Roman Empire during the time. Painting eggs in the blood of child sacrifice for their fertility goddess, doing other pagan rituals. This holiday is rooted back to the Babylonian Ishtar. Note that this is a pagan feast. Jesus' crucifiction was on Passover. John 19:13-14 (KJV) When Pilate therefore heard that saying, he brought Jesus forth, and sat down in the judgment seat in a place that is called the Pavement, but in the Hebrew, Gabbatha. And it was the preparation of the passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King! Note that this is a Jewish feast. Acts 12 talks about Herod the Roman backed king persecuting Peter. Herod's plan was to bring forth Peter to the people after the pagan Roman holiday of Easter, not the Jewish Passover. The Catholic Church just rebranded Easter as a 'Christian' thing when it is actually not. To this very day, the Catholics' Easter do not coincide with the Jewish Passover. These are two separate days being observed. That's just from the difference between Passover and Easter perspective. Next, timeframe. Passover is already long gone by the time we reach Acts 12. Acts 12:3 (KJV) And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.) Note Unleavened Bread. The Feast of Unleavened Bread is being celebrated in that passage. This is: Leviticus 23:4-6 (KJV) These are the feasts of the LORD, even holy convocations, which ye shall proclaim in their seasons. In the fourteenth day of the first month at even is the LORD'S passover. And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the feast of unleavened bread unto the LORD: seven days ye must eat unleavened bread. Passover, and THEN 7 days of Unleavened Bread. If Herod was waiting to bring forth Peter after Passover, it looks like he could have done it right away. It's already Unleavened Bread. Unless.. there is an entirely different feast celebrated by non-Jews and non-Christians unrelated to Passover that is close enough that happened during or after the Unleavened Bread. Oh look what we have here. Turns out there is this thing called Easter that the pagans in ancient Rome celebrated within that exact timeframe. I hope that our pagan backed Roman puppet king doesn't celebrate it.
Problem is Passover and Days of Unleavened Bread are used interchangeably. I believe Matthew calls the day of Preparation the first day of Unleavened Bread. This is the type of familiar or casual language we use today. For instance, when its December 20 or December 27, people typically say its Christmas, even though Christmas are technically on the 25th. If Matthew calls the day of Preparation the first day of Unleavened Bread, then Luke can use similar language as well. Passover and Unleavened Bread are the same feast. Passover can mean the days of Unleavened Bread. Also, technically speaking, the 14th is the preparation of the passover. The passover technically starts on the 15th and continues for 7 days. That's why the 14th are called the preparation of the passover. There's a parallel between the "unblemished" lamb and the "Unleavened bread". It represents the same thing. Hence Passover and Unleavened Bread are interchangeably. Lastly, the author literally says Passover, not Easter. So if you are arguing that the KJV is correct, then you are mistaken, with all sincerity.
You have to believe on what he did on the cross and that is how did he die? He shed his blood for forgiveness of sin. Believe and receive And you are sealed to the day of redemption Ephesians 4:30 kjv.
One thing that has always stood out to me is how could a man of God ever put his name first on Gods Holy Bible? Think on that Kjv only peeps. Its King Jesus Bible!
Wow! I am shocked by all these comments on the different versions of the Bible. How rude some people are about God. A God that is literally the very essence of LOVE. Whether one uses the Geneva Bible, the Ethiopian Bible, the KJV Bible or any other Bible, if it won the hearts of men who cares which version it is. The Bible is only supposed to lead people to God and from there the Spirit of Truth which is Jesus Christ himself will teach you what you need to know. Remember in the Bible where it talks about how Jesus always went against the Pharacees? The ones that looked more to a book of Laws than to the Spirit of God? I ask you who were the Pharacee's? They were the church folk. And the Bible says BEWARE OF THE LEAVEN OF THE PHARACEES. In other words y'all are doing the very same thing they did. If Jesus were here im sure he would tell you to stop such ignorance and LOVE one another like he commanded us to do. That is the Bible in a nutshell..... Love God and Love your brothers and sisters as you love yourself. People we can argue over which Bible to use and at the same time miss the WHOLE MESSAGE. SHAME ON US! Father open our eyes to see and our ears to hear what the Spirit says to us.
Why some have problems with Reasoned eclecticism. I John 5:7 is found in a majority of the Latin, but not the Greek so out it goes. Good will towards men Doxology in Matthew Without cause God manifest in the flesh Are a majority in the Greek but not in the Latin, so out they go The PA and Mark 16:9-20 are a majority in both the Greek and Latin so out they go. Even the “not yet” found in the two of the earliest(P66.P75) in John 7:8 some throw out. If as an orthodox Christian you don't see a problem, what would you see as a problem?
Such an old argument....what does it matter....all religion is used for three purposes... 1. maintain control over the minds and actions of the people. 2. Maintain the income of those in power. 3. Maintain total power over the population.
Genesis 6.12 And God looked upon the earth and behold it was corrupt for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth. John who so ever eateth my flesh and drink my blood hath eternal life. The King James Version is corrupted before God. God is not a book. God is a eternal spirit that dwells within you
KJV itself was revised in 1769. Even though there maybe 20 different Modern versions available today, 50 percent of Bible buyers STILL purchase the KJV. If it ain't broke..........
One may want to check into Brandon Peterson, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist
@@sanalouis2620 Agreed. (Revelation 22:18-19) "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: {19} And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."
Jesus Christ is latin which was a red flag for me and the fact this is the most well respected version which is also a red flag because nothing in this world is truth! They will never promote what's real and sacred
@@duncanrutherford2467 Back in the day the letter J wasn't in the hebrew alphabet. When they started to translate the bibles is when they added the letter J .Yahova,YESHUA is the actual name .Jesus comes from the pagan religion
The term latin in koine Greek adds up to 666. The term tradition in Greek also adds up to 666. Such coincidences have meaning when papal Rome is recognized in Rev.17.
No doubt the King was corrupt, but the translators were fine scholars for their time and by and large godly men. The Authorized version is overall a very good translation. Like all translations it has its problems but is good enough to be held up as the word of God. Only the original can be said to be God-breathed and infallible. However insofar as translation goes it is a worthy translation for anyone who believes and loves the truth in Jesus. It is our duty to study and discover what we can in the original. To say that the truth is so obscured in the Authorized translation on any necessary point of doctrine that we ought to dispense with it is simply not true. Regarding the original languages the Authorized version is based on the same Greek text type common in the 16th and 17th century. If we find this line of reason to have any merit, then we ought to dismiss or question the theology of era before and after this translation came forth. The fact is that there are so many good solid Christian men over time used the AV shows the flaws of this denunciation and dismissive presentation. I can say as one who never builds any doctrine without examining the original, and for me Greek is more directly my concentrated area of knowledge I can say for certain the AV NT is a fine translation. When I have to amend or correct the AV I do so. In fact, there is no translation which cannot either be improved or enhanced in some fashion. For me all Greek manuscripts matter and must be consulted. No one manuscript text type should ever be swept aside completely and ignored. One may favor the Byzantine text over the Critical text but to simply discard either regardless of what camp you cast your lot with seems to me to be extreme and unreasonable. I use the AV and NASB, but I leave every man to his or her own conscience on the subject. History has demonstrated that the AV has been and will continue to be useful and a blessing to those who use this as their primary Bible. The KJV Only cult is another subject all together. If calling any translation, the word of God is somehow wrong or impious then let's dispense with all translations and learn to read the originals instead. Unfortunately, in order to convey the sacred truth of scriptures to anyone who does not know Hebrew or Greek would still be at the mercy of a translator. Hence, translations live on as God has ordained. Unto Him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus throughout all ages. world without end. Amen. AV.
How about 1 John 3:9-10 KJV Are YOU (PERSONALLY) ok with the subtle, DRASTIC changes.... Concerning how everyone can know who "the children of God" are and "the children of the devil"!? If YOU were a child of the devil, wouldn't YOU flood a nation with alternate "versions"...then begin corrupting everyone's faith in the good old KJV HOLY BIBLE? I WOULD! and THEY...have!
I am a Bible translator and recommend the NKJV, which translation is quite faithful as translations go. The NIV is easier to read but adds 15% of interpretation, which any Christian should find objectionable. The cost of smoothing out a rendering in any language is right theology.
One may want to check out Brandon Peterson, who has proved through English numerics that the KJV is indeed God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist
@@IntegritySyndicate - Here is The Savior YaH The Heavenly FATHER (Genesis 1) HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF” From the Ancient Semitic: "Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3) Ancient Semitic Direct Translation Yad - "Behold The Hand" He - "Behold the Breath" Vav - "Behold The NAIL"
Jeremiah 10: The GREAT GOD 6 Forasmuch as there is none like unto thee, O LORD; thou art great, and thy name is great in might. 7 Who would not fear thee, O King of nations? for to thee doth it appertain: forasmuch as among all the wise men of the nations, and in all their kingdoms, there is none like unto thee. 10 But the LORD is the true God, he is the living God, and an everlasting king: at his wrath the earth shall tremble, and the nations shall not be able to abide his indignation. 11 Thus shall ye say unto them, The gods that have not made the heavens and the earth, even they shall perish from the earth, and from under these heavens. 12 He hath made the earth by his power, he hath established the world by his wisdom, and hath stretched out the heavens by his discretion. 13 When he uttereth his voice, there is a multitude of waters in the heavens, and he causeth the vapours to ascend from the ends of the earth; he maketh lightnings with rain, and bringeth forth the wind out of his treasures.
And it shall be, when he sitteth upon the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of this law in a book out of that which is before the priests the Levites: Deut 17:18 (KJV) Name one English Bible. Name one Hebrew Bible. That has what the Levites had in the Old and New Testament. That is copied by a King as The Almighty God COMMANDS in the Scriptures? The Levites didn't have the (LXX) Greek Septuagint. So Every Last Revised Version Bible is AGAINST THE COMMAND OF GOD. No Revised Version Bible is copied by a King. This also makes every Revised Version Bible is AGAINST THE COMMAND OF GOD. The 1539 A.D. Great Bible is Copied by a King (Henry VIII) but the Hebrew translation is incomplete using the Latin Vulgate for most of the Old Testament which comes from the (LXX) Greek Septuagint. So the Great Bible is AGAINST THE COMMAND OF GOD. The Geneva Bible is not copied by a King. So the Geneva Bible is AGAINST THE COMMAND OF GOD. The Hebrew Mikraot Gedolot is exactly what the Levites had copied by Kings. However, there is no NEW TESTAMENT Mikraot Gedolot. The only Preservation of the "Book of the LORD" (Isaiah 34:16) that FULFILLS THE COMMAND OF GOD with the scriptures the Levites had in the Old Testament (Deuteronomy 17:18) and the scriptures the Levites had in the New Testament (Acts 4:36; Acts 6:7; Acts 13:1, 2, 49) is THE HOLY BIBLE AUTHORIZED BY KING JAMES copied by a King with the scriptures that the LEVITES had. God never commanded that you have the oldest most reliable manuscripts which is a Revised Version Vatican Protestant version bible lie. God never commanded that you have a translation that is easier to read in modern language that's a failed argument to (Mark 9:31, 32) God never command that it's ok to have a flawed bible like all these Revised Versions are because no one has the original manuscripts. God never told anybody you would have the original manuscripts. God commanded that mankind have what the Levites had copied by a King, which the HOLY BIBLE AUTHORIZED BY KING JAMES IS. The maker of this video does err not knowing the scriptures nor the power of God. REPENT AND BELIEVE THE GOSPEL - Mark 1:15
@Christopher Sparkes Brother The Lord JESUS CHRIST hates opposition to the truth so bad he calls it a lie. So let's see who can tell the Truth. Name a Revised Bible that has every jot and tittle of the Holy Scriptures that the Levites the priest had. You can't. Name a single Revised Version Bible to that was copied by a king. There are none. Thats's corruption. Changing words - Matthew 6:19 (Vermin). Taking out words - Ephesians 3:9 (by Jesus Christ). Adding words - 2 Samuel 21:8 (Merab) Contradicting Holy Scripture - Mark 1:2 (As written in the prophet Isaiah I will send my messenger...) That ain't written in Isaiah that's written in Malachi 3:1 We you got a weak argument because you ain't been studying. A 4th grader can see those Revised Version Bible lies. That ain't got nothing to do with Theology. Stop it. You sounding like the rest of those unregenerated, uncircumcised in heart and ears resistors of the holy ghost who won't submit to God or the truth So let me help you out. In the English tongue (Isaiah 28:11) The only preservation of the Book of the Lord (Isaiah 34:16) that has every jot and tittle that the Levite priest had that was copied by a king (Deuteronomy 17:18) Stand on that TRUTH. Learn your Holy Bible. Judgment day is coming (Hebrews 9:27) Stop messing around.
@@allwillberevealed777 You got no proof. And the Proof that exists makes you a LIAR. The Hebrew that the Levites had was written in 1406 B.C. in the Moab Desert (Deuteronomy 29:1), which has been copied for 3,430 years (count year "0" as 1 year). In 1717, the first Grand Lodge, an association of lodges, was founded in England, and Freemasonry was soon disseminated throughout the British Empire. The first American Mason lodge was established in Philadelphia in 1730, and future revolutionary leader Benjamin Franklin was a founding member. So let's see if you graduate the public school system and can count. 1406 B.C. to 1717 A.D. makes the Holy Scriptures that are copied in the Authorized Holy Bible in the English tongue 3,130 years (you count year "0" as one year) BEFORE YOUR FREEMASON DOGS. 1406 B.C. to 1730 A.D. make the Holy Scriptures that are copied in the Authorized Holy Bible in the English tongue 3,137 years (you count year "0" as one year) BEFORE YOUR USELESS FREEMASON SWINE. We don't give that which is Holy unto the Dogs or those Swine. That ain't got the scriptures in their hearts or minds. They are adulterers and Devil Worshippers. THE DISCIPLES OF JESUS CHRIST FOLLOW JESUS CHRIST. You need to stop repeating folks that don't know what they are talking about because it makes you look STUPID. And nobody can be THAT STUPID. Repent and Believe the Gospel. - Acts 2:38
Integrity Syndicate? Yes definitely a “syndicate” with Jesuit overtones. But Integrity? Go and learn what the word means (may have to go back 400 years, remember the English language “has been updated”) and then apply and see if it reflects honestly in your mirror.
The lengths that christians will go to lie to themselves is absolutely mind numbing. How could any sane person base their salvation on such a CLEARLY corrupted text? You might as well base your salvation on the Harry Potter series.
Just because there are clearly false and corrupted articles written by confused people telling you that salt is sweet, doesn't mean the only one telling you it is salty is also false. "The lengths that chefs will go to lie to themselves is absolutely mind numbing. How could any sane person base their recipe on such a CLEARLY corrupted text? You might as well base your recipe on the Harry Potter series." You can replace salt with whatever you want for the analogy, but you catch my drift on how we feel right?
@@arabianknight0000 True. Instead, the word of God is The Truth. And it is written as the Bible. Psalms 119:160 (KJV) Thy word is true from the beginning: and every one of thy righteous judgments endureth for ever. 2 Timothy 3:16-17 (KJV) All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. John 1:1-17 (KJV) In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. John 14:6 (KJV) Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
@@steveneurwyn stop embarrassing yourself and turn to Allah now as Jesus did and all the prophets before it's too late and stop wasting your life being ignorant.
@@arabianknight0000 The Islamic Al-Lah was a Quraish pagan moon deity with three daughters: Al-Lat, Al-Uzza and Manat. It was even referred to in the Quran. Muhammad came in and decided to make his own religion by editing what the locals' belief into monotheistic and enforced it under the threat of death, terrorizing and raiding cities in the Middle East, eventually conquering them. He copied and pasted many Biblical accounts in the Quran but they were all obviously and ridiculously in error. The account of Isa that the Muslims tried to pass as Jesus is almost hilarious. Born of Maryam the sibling of Aaron the sibling of Moses? That's thousands of Years before the Roman Empire and somehow Isa can escape from crucifiction when such things did not exist if he was truly born from such a figure. Not to mention, following Arabic conversion rules with Hebrew, Isa is Esau, not Jesus. Jesus is Yasuh. Esau is also supposed to be born hundreds of years before Moses and Aaron to a different set of parents. Muhammad was also a penyair, a diviner, a medium for evil spirits that reveals their predictions through songs. He also got the Quran from whom he claimed to be an angel (Gabriel of all things) in a cave - in which the Bible already warned that: 2 Corinthians 11:14 (KJV) And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. And that caves are: 2 Peter 2:4 (KJV) For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment; The so called Jibril was most likely a demon imprisoned in the cave Muhammed came in to and used him to cause mayhem and confusion to the word of God, ensuring the damnatiom of many to Hell.
I discovered corruptions in the KJV over 30 years ago. Once the blinders fell off I discovered more errors, and eventually dropped the unBiblical trinity doctrine. I became a Biblical Monotheist and accepted Jesus as the man who told us the truth he heard from God. Jesus died for our sins. God cannot die. YHHW placed his words into Jesus. Jesus is not YHWH's word made flesh. John 1:14 is an error. Correction: "....and the word CAME TO HUMANITY and dwelt IN US......" etc. If the word is not dwelling in you, then you are not saved. Jesus is never called the word in the Bible.
The KJV along with the trinitarian dogma is false. I'm familiar with the claim that John 1.14 should be "Came to flesh", but on what grounds really? Its true in principle that the word of God came to man, but what does John say? There's no preposition as in the other cases when John uses in his prologue with regards to EGENETO. Same in reference to John 10.35 (?) where Jesus says the word/LOGOS came (EGENETO) TO (PROS) men. It appears John is using figurative language similar to his Teacher in John 6. Jesus speaks of himself as the bread which came down from heaven. That bread is his flesh, and whoever consume his flesh will have eternal life. But of course this was figurative speech, because he says "Its the spirit that gives life, THE FLESH PROFITS NOTHING, the words I speak is spirit and life". So the bread of life/his flesh are figuratively the spirit which came down at the baptism upon him, that's why John the baptist says "he whom God has sent speaks the words of God, because God does not give to him the spirit by measure" (paraphrase - John 3). Jesus says the bread (his flesh) came down from heaven. We know his flesh began in the womb of his mother. But this was a figure of speech for the spirit that gives life, the flesh profits nothing. When he was spiritually designated son of God, his flesh did not profit, and he would ultimately put off the flesh for a new spiritual one. So just as Jesus figuratively spoke of his flesh coming down, it seems John in the same way speaks of the word of God becoming flesh. Not literally. But God's words were animated through the flesh. "the life was manifested" (1 John 1) When trinitarians use John 1.14 to say God became flesh, I just ask whether Jesus' flesh also came down from heaven... When they say the word became flesh, I add, and Jesus said that same flesh came down from heaven. The word which is spirit does not literally become flesh, neither did Jesus' flesh come down from heaven. Best explanation, John is using figure of speech like his own Teacher. Anyway the KJV is full of problems, but God can use anything at the end of the day.
Whaaatttt? How could you possibly deny the trinity? It's a theme echoed throughout the entire Bible and explicitly implied multiple times. I pray that you my brothers, give things another look. Also if you were able to prove a SINGLE issue with the KJV you would be famous, atheists especially have been trying to nit pick it apart since it's inception, not one man has EVER proven beyond ANY doubt any, no even one SINGLE VERSE to EVER be wrong. Said with love.
Every single one of you is a trinity. You all have a mind a body and a soul. That's 3 things. If you can have 3 parts of yuh then why not God who created us in his image?
18:15 - "A number of verses in the King James Version of the New Testament are not found in modern Bible translations."
This clown laments about alleged Trinitarian bias in the KJV, and then points to the modern versions - the modern *Codex VATICANUS* versions - as superior.
@@MichaelTheophilus906 The modern Catholic versions are the pro-Trinitarian corruptions. Not the KJV.
*JOHN 3:13 (KJV)* And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man **which is in heaven.**
The modern, pro-Trinitarian corruptions remove "which is in heaven". Why? Because if "the Second Person of the Trinity" is simultaneously on earth _AND in heaven_ - where he is presumably omnipotent - then there is no need whatsoever for another redundantly omnipotent God person in heaven, let alone TWO other redundantly omnipotent God PERSONS in heaven.
*JOHN 4:23-24 (KJV)* [23] But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. [24] **God is a Spirit:** and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.
The modern, pro-Trinitarian corruptions change "God is **a** Spirit" to "God is Spirit". Why? Because "God" is clearly "God the Father" here...and if God the Father - aka, "the First Person of the Trinity" - is **a** Spirit, then all the sudden Trinitarians are exposed as being worshippers of _multiple_ Spirits...because certainly "the THIRD Person of the Trinity" is **a** Spirit (who is _distinct_ from the First Person). So **"a"** gets removed and "Spirit" in "God is Spirit" conveniently becomes a qualitative noun - meaning, "Spirit" is just a quality shared by three distinct, coequal God persons.
*DANIEL 7:9 (KJV)* I beheld till the thrones were **cast down,** and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.
The modern, pro-Trinitarian corruptions remove "cast down" and replace with its _opposite_ "set up" (NASB, NET, AMP, etc) or "set in place" (NIV, NRSV, CSB, etc) or "placed" (ESV, RSV, ASV, etc) or "put in place" (NKJV, NLT, GNT, etc). Why? Because multiple thrones being "set up" facilitates the "heavenly council" nonsense, where additional heavenly thrones are presumably occupied by "the Second Person" and "the Third Person" among others. In the _true_ English-language bible, the thrones are "cast down" because they're the thrones of the four BEASTS (which are four KINGS, v.17), not heavenly thrones.
*1 TIMOTHY 3:16 (KJV)* And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: **GOD** was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.
The modern, pro-Trinitarian corruptions remove "GOD" and replace with plain ol' "He". Why? Because there is only "one GOD, the FATHER" (1 Cor.8:6) - aka, "the First Person of the Trinity"......and if "the First Person of the Trinity" was "manifest in the flesh", then you can stick a fork in Trinitarianism.
@@MichaelTheophilus906 This man have his statement of faith on the info of his channel. That would be helpfull to understand him. "Bible truth reveals: Jesus Christ the Son of God IS THE INVISIBLE FATHER who - without leaving heaven - came down from heaven and manifested himself as a genuine flesh-and-blood man. " I think that should clarify what and why he is saying what he is saying. I would just add that I disagree with that statement of his. I think he is right in one thing. KJV supports very confused Jesus is God opinion and not a concise theological position of any kind. So if you are a Jesus is God and you are in majority in America (like 99% Americans think so and have no idea about the Trinity and still call themselves Trinitarians being basicly a Modalists like this guy) but still want to be viewed in your mind as minority - join the KJV. You will still be in majority but that conspiracy theory vibes would make you satisfied. This or join the rapture cult. You will feel like people say that is ridiculous and you could feel like a minority yet being the majority. I think that both of those are so psychologicly satisfying that they had to be devised by some psy-op specialists.
@@narrowpathofthetruth _>>> "...you could feel like a minority yet being the majority."_
Exactly.
*TRINITARIANISM:* The Father compelled his personally distinct, "eternally begotten" Son to suffer and die _against that personally distinct Son's own will_ ("NOT MY WILL, but thine, be done"). Child sacrifice.
*"Biblical" UNITARIANISM:* The Father compelled his personally distinct, "human only" Son to suffer and die _against that personally distinct Son's own will_ ("NOT MY WILL, but thine, be done"). Child sacrifice.
@@euston2216 That is the first time ever a try to make BU into majority. Nice tru tho. Jesus have sacrificed himself by doing God's will. I think that is not what someone think of a child sacrifice but.... whatever.
Go ahead and keep spouting off, this will be evidence used “in your favor?” on the day of judgment. Your a witness against yourself! Can there any good thing come out of Laodicea?
Here's the difference between Daniel 11,43 43 But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans and the Ethiopians shall be at his steps.KJV 43 But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt, and of the Libyans, and of the black Mores where he shall pass.Geneva Bible Can you see the difference?
Agreed. One may want to check into Brandon Peterson, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist -- people say numbers don't lie ... Brandon has a lot of free resources that proves the point that he shares with the World to overcome these baseless attacks on the KJV. Once i see all of the "scholars" attack the KJV, it makes me run toward the KJV ...
The book of Tobit is amazing. It’s funny how it was removed for “magic.” Do you not know GOD is the ultimate magician??? Where do you think “magic” comes from? This is a quote from Reddit. “In the deuterocanonical Book of Tobit, Tobias is instructed by the angel Raphael to use the burnt heart and liver of a fish to drive away the demon Asmodeus, and he also is told to use the gall of a fish to cure Tobit's (his father) blindness. Is this an example of ancient Jewish magic and are there other examples of this type of magic among ancient Jews?” Ummm…hello?? This is completely in GODs character! Lol If this amazing LEGITIMATE book was removed then you need to remove the WHOLE BIBLE. Lol God told Moses to perform magic to prove he is the Almighty. Are you daft? The whole Bible is full of MAGIC. Moses turned a snake into a staff. Do you remember??? Moses parted to Red Sea with a staff! Harry Potter on crack much? Elijah used his MAGICAL cloak of powers GOD gave him to summon a bear out of the woods to maul a gang of teenagers to death. Lol Elijah asked Elisha what he wanted. To name one thing he wanted before Elijah was rapture up (the rapture is magic in itself) and he wanted Elijah’s magic Cloak. This is insane. They didn’t remove any book for “magic.” That’s a damned to hell lie. If that was the case the whole Bible would be removed. Give me a break,
False teachers and their false Bibles preach Grace (AS) Christians commit sin. Real gospel preachers preach (empowering) Grace over, above, and against committing sin. Therefore, Real Preachers Preach from the Real KJV bible.
This is blatantly false. The KJV Bible was drafted through translation AND inspection of previous translations. Why? Because it was to be the best translation ever, and to be that it needed to consider the work that was done before and be translated with the wisdom and work of wise men before taken in consideration.
KJV is a Catholic Bible translated from textus receptus by 47 scholars members of Anglican Church of England. Anglican Church is a breakaway of Roman Catholicism but very similar in beliefs, doctrines and practices. Textus RECEPTUS belongs to a Catholic priest Desiderius Erasmus.
@@renoaba-a6431 SORRY! RESOURCES ARE WRONG! REPENT! GOD'S WRATH IS COMING. BELIEVE ON THE SAVING GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST.. ETERNAL LIFE IS IN JESUS CHRIST. NOT IN A RELIGION. ROMANS 6:23, 1 JOHN 5:20, 1 JOHN 5:20, 1 CORINTHIANS 15:1-4, JOHN 14:6
I do not frustrate the grace of God for if righteousness came by the law then Christ IS DEAD in vain. Galatians 2:21 IS DEAD is current tense - a contradiction of the resurrection of Christ. The KJV translators would not agree with you and all the previous translations prior to the KJV were highly recommended by the KJV translators
You can use a British accent because it's been proven Americans feel it has authority, but this will still be VERY incorrect. Even older bibles use all these terms and scriptures this guy says the KJV "added". Bounce the KJV off the Geneva and 1500 versions you'll find it's very very close. Just some stuff changed because it didn't suit the king and catholics
Moron AI The NKJ version is believed to be one of the most accurate English versions of any other English Bibles. Going from Greek and from Hebrew.. multiple languages some languages do have words for others. You are incorrect about how accurate it is now. NKJVB
You are saved by grace though faith in Jesus shed blood on the cross like it says in the kjv in Roman's 3:25 Faith in his Blood and 1 Corinthians 15:vs 1 thru 4 The Gospel how that Jesus died according to the scriptures and He was buried and rose again according to the scriptures and believe this from the heart like it says in the KJV. And also Jesus said I am the way the truth and the life no one comes to the Father but by me like itsays in the KJV it's the only one I read. The other perversions are corrupted
It's easy - ALL bibles are minor historical sources. Ask your self this --Do you have any provable, fact-based evidence of anything spiritual in the bible? And by "evidence" I mean, NOT any hearsay, feelings, faith, beliefs, hopes, coincidences or bible stories written by man.
If you take the KJV and compare the verses in other bibles yourself, I believe you will agree with the KJV. I did just that and find the other bibles, especially that use the “Critical text” try to eliminate the “blood of Christ”, Christ’s deity, and many other things. It is not that hard to compare with the tools available.
Although I like most of the content on this channel, and that many of the people whom are refuted against in todays society on here concerning the trinity and shedding Gods light: I'd have to say that that there were many errors in this video concerning the 1611, especially the arasmus rumor; it's a rumor, and if you look deeply enough into that subject, and look at the documents, 1john 5:7 has always been in the greek and arasmus never forged anything. He has statements. And arasmus refuted the rumor, and even names of the highest scholars of textual criticism have admitted this error on their part against 1john. Experts in linguistics, and texual analysis have heavily studied 1john and have concluded that 1john makes no sense in anyway grammatically or contextually, in the greek or english with 5:7 missing based off of many things. And it was also one of the leading forces on why the creed did what they did. If it were not for that main verse, the creed wouldn't have used the pagan the argument they did, so strongly. 1john 5:7 was well in circulation in the body of Christ, revelations backs and harmonized it as well. 1stjohn is a reflection of Genesis, and the gospel of john introduction and revelation and it bears record to the entire bible. Beginning to end. And scholars have acknowledged this. The fact that the creed argued it, is the very evidence it was there, and the fact that it was there, and the church was still oneness, and refused to believe the trinity, was even further proof that it didn't mean what the creed thought it did. The written documents between the creed reveal this very truth about the early body of Christ. Arguing that 5:7 wasn't there to refute Trinitarianism is actually a worse argument, and a bad stance. They even exiled the arians from the council, and persecuted them too, because of the oneness stance they took that half way agreed with the trinitarian discussion; they shared similar concept but that Jesus with God preincarnate physically from the beginning or similar rather....So what does this tell you...that the verse was there.. The argument wasn't for no reason... It was one of the strongest reasoning for their convoluted minds. In otherwords, to believe otherwise is simply intellectual suicide. Because what are you arguing, if it wasn't there, and what are you arguing for them if they didn't think it was there? What are you arguing against them if it wasn't their? So what is the witness of men? And why is the witness of God greater? There were other errors I've found with this video, about the 1611 as well, that try to point to "sinister conspiracy" that piggyback from what I've said, because of the emphasis on 1john 5:7, And as well as just not considering mans fallible ways. No translation can be perfect, but I do think the 1611 is going to be the closest in as few errors as possible regarding execution, compared to any other translations, and so i believe in started where we have the most accurate grounds to then look up specific meanings of words. If not, try to look up something in an NIV in the same verse as a 1611 and let me know if you get the same meaning for the intended word given in translation; use a different word or less accurate word and you get a different meaning in the original language; because it's not accurate. Infact I dont just think, but i KNOW, that if people are putting that much faith in man, that they are not even ever checking the Greek or Hebrew, you are doing yourself a disservice to the honesty of the original languages to begin with and God's WORD. It is textually impossible to have a perfect translational interpretation and literal meaning in a sound way at the same time; You have to choose one: or the other. The bibles we have, are not meant for literal accuracy, they are meant to convey accurate interpretation... Tell me how many verses make sense to you when you read from a youngs literal translation......... Studying is different than reading. You cannot read any single english bible, and expect literal accuracy, so if you need to understand doctrinal specifics, you HAVE TO look up original language for literal meaning. The bibles we have were meant to convey in spirit of the writing in HOPEFULLY the most sound way possible. There are too many language rules we would break if we wanted what we keep arguing the sake of, and believe me, we don't really want that... We would not understand a thing. Stop putting faith in man, and put your faith in our oneness Father, and His son Jesus Christ, and just study. I was saved by the WORD, but if I toss out my bible I'm still saved. No man is perfect but Jesus Christ. Stop trying to make man perfect. I believe as according to even the prefacial dedicatory statements, by the translators to you in the 1611, that they did their best. That's all they claimed to do, and I appreciate their humbleness for admitting that. If you want God's true understanding, you need to labor for it; and you are expected to. I believe the 1611 had the best intention, and conveyed with the best intent in spirit of laboring for translation in light of balance between literal and interpretational honesty in a way that the gentiles would best grasp understanding: Because when I read anything else, it's "just not there" : pronouns, punctuation, attitude, grammar, expression, etc. Don't believe me; try mathew 5 on divorce in 1611, and tell me the difference in what you see in every other translation, from NASB to NIV. On what the real issue of divorce was and what the Jews of their time were doing, and pay sharp attention to dissect those 2 verse in 1611. Thats just one example... Screw the spelling. I want the heart of the intent... I believe their will never be another translation like the 1611 ever again, especially with how lost the english language has become, and the worse it is getting. If you don't think language can be so far removed, ask yourself how many translation will start to pump out according to keeping up with words in english like "mewing", and "looksmaxing" and how badly they will have to alter the original languages to facilitate translation and interpretation to that... There is such a thing as too far: And it's already bad enough. But at the end of the day, we have to pick a translation, and shit, or get off the pot.... The 1611 sheds light on many things that no other translation does in many ways, as apposed to others. If you look at every man, with the same faith you need to put in jesus, you will always think they're conspiring against you. We live by the spirit of the law of love and liberty, for a reason. We live by spiritual understanding, spiritual expression of the law, if we so choose, but Had Jesus not come, I think we'd be in big trouble relying on any textual integrity of english, from Hebrew and Greek, to convey even the Law of the commandments, contained in ordinances, let me tell you... We need to know what is spiritually doctrinally important for today, because like the Law, that's our spiritual equivalent in such cases, that marks salvific difference, unfortunately with these new translations. We should focus on what is exceptionally scholarly, and warn people about what is truly the garbage of today; If we demonize the 1611 in light of everything I've said, what will we push future believers to read from? What are they reading from now??...Would you rather them read a 1611 or an NET, NLT, NIV, NRSV, or a McArthur lordship reference bible?? We have to find a common ground and fight for something: We are all believers in the body of Christ and are more equipped spiritually than I fear the newer believers ever will have a chance to be, unfortunately, and we have to steer the younger and spiritually naive generation of believers in a direction; what direction is that going to be?? Go for the majority in accurate conveyance, keep faith in Jesus, and look up the text if the Spirit of the Father wants you to. No translation is as faithful as Jesus Christ; but know when a translation is absolutely conspiring against Jesus, and not yourself. Amen, Be Blessed, be well.
infact the whole purpose of the 1611 Bible was made for layman people, the common person, to have God's word and be understood in a common manner. It was not created for the scholarly and academics. They are two different things, two different types of people, two different purposes, and the common man cannot dedicate his layman life to living for God's word in the same way, and as academically as a scholar. This refutes the very purpose of the 1611,and what it stood for, and if you don't believe that, then why did even this video record the very errors of even the scholarly... This is what I mean. It is okay, for the common man to be the common man and common woman, and let teachers be academic. We should all teach interpretation to one another in good spirit, and sound spiritual understanding, we need scholars, and they're held to a higher degree by the Father. God doesn't expect the same of us. We will have rewards for different things down here. God wants to use us differently, but I do think that we should also use our God given discernment with the best of our God given abilities to have this understanding about things, and to put our best foot forthright. We easily scoff at scholars, but who's really put out a better translation than the 1611 since it's inception? Nitpicking a word or phrase is not even merely scratching the surface, in entailing what is required in and of, the translational profession. These people a have to be capable of linguistic marksmanship, and genius level of understanding, not only in language, in multicultural understanding, but grammar, punctuation, and everything that belongs to specific said language, heritage, interpretation, conveyance, rules of said language vs our very own language concerning structure, and Ordinances. And they need to know how to conjunctualize, and deliver it. Maybe it was done with their English culture in mind, but it's definitely to be much more respected than the culture that we currently live in. They had a level of proficiency that not one scholar consistently has to this day. Infact: what scholar do we know today, that has any extreme level of excellence in Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic today, letalone all 3 beyond, paper, and a couple early college courses, and that can even properly hold a culturally decent verbal conversation with anybody in those languages even at a street level, today; that are even still studying? And why haven't we come out with anything better than the 1611? Nobody today is capable; that is why. Do we read 5 different translations with our kids, and set down the 1611? The further out we move with our watered down and deterioration of an English language, the further away we get from understanding these ancient languages. Look where we are from the 1611. Look where those scholars were when they made it accessible for mankind in English. Both of our cultural differences may have their gripes, but I think the way they interpreted the scriptures was definitely reflective of something to show for importance of something we are lacking today, at the very least. Something we lack that is incapable of reproduction. Some things are gone for good. King James didn't want reference notes; I agree that it has done nothing but impede the reader and confuse our spirit, and sway believers on personal bias of the note makers. How many reference and study bibles today are completely denominationally and reformationally filled with junk and lies. There's a serious lack of appreciation, we're an ungrateful generation; We have nothing but trash translations today, and the 1611 was put out to a generation that had basically none, and was able to produce what they did. The Geneva was not perfect either and in also many more worse ways than the 1611, with or without it's references. We can study what exactly was wrong with that Bible, too. It was beyond a King-Conspiracy. We can say what we want about their generation and their culture and religious actions, but is not an excuse to exile the 1611, they were the closest thing to a generation the was biologically conservative to boot. Would we today, expect them to read from an NIV from a generation that can't even tell what a man is or what a woman is, when they read the horrors that are of that translation compared to what they put out for us? They put that 1611 out for us.... We aught to think good before we accuse their culture as anxious to read from anything else. What would they think about our laws? Infact; If we hung tight to their very translation the way they'd hoped people would have appreciated, I think our society would even be in better shape.
I'm so sick of people out to put doubts in everybody's head, concerning God's word. The time is short, the devil is working overtime, so let's just share the simple plan of Salvation. I believe Jesus is coming back soon. Stop with this bs.
the whole idea that the KJV is the ONLY translation.. that...teaches a Triniitarianism view of God is one big lie... example Mark 1:1 from the KJV.... The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God; ASV The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God .in fact just about ALL translations do... AMP The beginning of the [facts regarding the] good news of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. AMPC The beginning [of the facts] of the good news (the Gospel) of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. BRG The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God; CSB The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. CEB The beginning of the good news about Jesus Christ, God’s Son, CJB The beginning of the Good News of Yeshua the Messiah, the Son of God: CEV This is the good news about Jesus Christ, the Son of God. DARBY Beginning of the glad tidings of Jesus Christ, Son of God; DLNT The beginning of the good-news of Jesus Christ, God’s Son DRA The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. ERV The Good News about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God, begins EASY This is the start of the good news about Jesus Christ. He is the Son of God. EHV The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. ESV The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. ESVUK The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. EXB This is the beginning of the ·Good News [Gospel] ·about [of] Jesus Christ, the Son of God, GNV 4 John baptizeth. 6 His apparel and meat. 9 Jesus is baptized. 12 He is tempted. 14 He preacheth the Gospel, 21 and 29 he teacheth in the Synagogues. 23 He healeth one that had a devil. 29 Peter’s mother-in-law. 32 Many diseased persons. 40 The leper. The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God: GW This is the beginning of the Good News about Jesus Christ, the Son of God. GNT This is the Good News about Jesus Christ, the Son of God. HCSB The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. ICB This is the beginning of the Good News about Jesus Christ, the Son of God, ISV This is the beginning of the gospel of Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God. PHILLIPS The Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God begins with the fulfilment of this prophecy of Isaiah-‘Behold, I send my messenger before your face, who will prepare your way before you’. ‘The voice of one crying in the wilderness: Prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight’. JUB ¶ The beginning of the gospel of Jesus, the Christ, Son of God, KJV The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God; AKJV The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God; LSB The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. LEB The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ. TLB Here begins the wonderful story of Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God. MSG The good news of Jesus Christ-the Message!-begins here, following to the letter the scroll of the prophet Isaiah. Watch closely: I’m sending my preacher ahead of you; He’ll make the road smooth for you. Thunder in the desert! Prepare for God’s arrival! Make the road smooth and straight! MEV The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. MOUNCE The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. NOG This is the beginning of the Good News about Yeshua Christ, the Son of God. NABRE The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ [the Son of God]. NASB The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, NASB1995 The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. NCB The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. NCV This is the beginning of the Good News about Jesus Christ, the Son of God, NET The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. NIRV This is the beginning of the good news about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God. NIV The beginning of the good news about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God, NIVUK The beginning of the good news about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God, NKJV The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. NLV The Good News of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, NLT This is the Good News about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God. It began NMB The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, NRSVA The beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. NRSVACE The beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. NRSVCE The beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. NRSVUE The beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ. NTFE This is where the good news starts-the good news of Jesus the Messiah, God’s son. OJB The Beginning of the Besuras HaGeulah (the Good News of Redemption) of Yehoshua, Rebbe Melech HaMoshiach [the] Ben HaElohim. RGT The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. RSV The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. RSVCE The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. TLV The beginning of the Good News of Yeshua ha-Mashiach, Ben-Elohim. VOICE This is the beginning of the good news of Jesus, the Anointed One, the Liberating King, the Son of God. WEB The beginning of the Good News of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. WE This is the beginning of the good news about Jesus Christ, God's Son. WYC The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. YLT A beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ, Son of God. Perhaps the Unitarians have it WRONG!...
You are not saved bye trusting gods word. You are saved bye the death burial and resurrection of Christ though all who have faith in the truth are saved that is not what saved them. It was christ faith unto death and his faith alone that brought him to die and pay the full price for all!! According to scripture.
Thank God for William Tyndale,
You are not saved by having a certain Bible translation on your lap, you’re saved by trusting the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ which was shed for your sins.
Sadly you do not know the power of the word.
Amen @ishiftfocus1769
A man of commonsense which is becoming rare in these days. I have read the KJV and Geneva bible and the NKJV and NASB and Living bible and l prefer the latter translations.
No, you are saved by regeneration. Being born again.
If it's an inaccurate translation like niv then yeah a bad context can be detrimental
The devil sure hates the KJV. But thanks to God, His Word is preserved.
Amen!!!!!!
1560 Geneva Bible solos 🥱😂
One may want to check into Brandon Peterson, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist -- people say numbers don't lie ... Brandon has a lot of free resources that proves the point that he shares with the World.
😂🤦🏽🤦♀️
@@JudeOne3Four The KJV Bible lets us know that your response is rude and of the devil.
I fell in love with Jesus reading the KJV
Your experience must be universal 😅😅😅😅
@@wendybart8409 Amen ....
And you can fall in love with SIN, reading the corrupt texts.
The KJV and Geneva translations are the best English translated bibles in existence. The Alexandrian manuscripts, however, are corrupted.
One may want to check into Brandon Peterson, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics, not even Geneva: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist -- people say numbers don't lie ... Brandon has a lot of free resources that proves the point that he shares with the World. God's hand was on the KJV, no doubt.
How are the Alexandrian manuscripts corrupted? Sweeping statement with no evidence. The usual lies of the KJV only cult.
Can you prove that statement?
bingo.
@@TexasHoosier3118the siniaticus claims to be over 1000 years old but as one noted scholar remarked- its appearance looked too pristine. There are many references in older church father wtitings which show the Textus Receptus version includes many if not all of the omitted passages in Akexandrian and Siniaticus. Ergo Alexandrian texts have been proven to be corrupted
yikes. let God be true but every man a liar
I don’t think the King James Bible is corrupted, though he was displeased reading the notes of the Geneva Bible. He authorized a translation of the holy Bible from the original tongues and he compared former translations along with the 1560 Geneva version
I was amazed at the Geneva bible being the first study bible. It wasn't until 1901, I think, when Schofield did a study bible. I need to rewatch the video where I saw this.
The king James did not like the Geneva calling out tyrants are not of God.
Schofield bibles were a vessel for Satan.
Geneva also has original texts unlike the freemason king James who changed the word of God and moving the scriptures around using numbers.... SATANIC.
Quit worshiping the Bible! The Spirit can show you salvation with any relevant Bible.
We worship the God of the KJV Bible.
I wouldn't give you 2¢ for The Christ of any modern "Bible
@@DouglasNicholson-ff6ep, There is Nothing wrong with the Amplified Bible. ,
@@johnpearce3714 Ya might want to compare
1 John 3:9 in the amplified spin.
"No one who is born of God (deliberately, knowingly, and habitually) practices sin"
1 John 3:9 KJV
Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
So, you honestly don't see any difference there?
Do you want a Jesus that keeps you from "committing rape", for example, or from "habitually practicing rape"?
Do You want your friends to have the Jesus of the KJV that keeps them from EVER committing adultery with YOUR wife....
Or the jesus of the amplified, that keeps them from (knowingly willingly habitually practicing) committing adultery with YOUR wife?
How about a Jesus of the KJV, that keeps men from ever committing murder,...or
The jesus of the amplified, that keeps men from (knowingly, willingly, habitually, practicing the SIN of murdering YOUR closest family & friends.
God is perfect, which means his word is perfect. His words have made it to humans, and we have written them down. If his words are perfect, there will be a perfect bible. KJV is currently closest to God's perfect word. There is a multitude of comparison examples that show the modern bibles to have blasphemy and heresy. Satan literally created a "New" KJV that is not a direct translation and tries to steer people away from true salvation. Your salvation IS your translation! Look up, Pastor Gene Kim, and thank me later. ❤
I agree with @blackholesun on this. Except for a handful of Bibles.
So long story short, the Geneva Bible help you out in understanding the Scriptures which went against king James agenda so they rejected the Geneva Bible, and translated the king James, the way that they thought it should be translated based on their agenda in their thoughts and opinions
compare the two bible
You're trying to sell the people the other one because it's from the Catholic Virgin and not the two testament that God wants us to read The Catholic there's no such thing as Portuguese and drunk like that trust the King James it's the only Bible that God wants us to have for now he authorized it and that's good bless you in Jesus name Amen 🙏💖🙏
It's changed to fit modern English. Compare the two. It wasn't changed as is claimed.
In my last video I show that the King James ruins the prophecy of Daniel chapter 8 because verse 26 has evening and morning in the definite article in the Hebrew and it's also singular. And it's the same in the King James. But this creates a problem because where was the prophecy of the single evening and the single morning and the entire chapter?
The Geneva Bible actually gets it much closer
Thank you Jesus, this integrity syndicate, just confirmed for the thousands time, how precious my King James Bible is. Thank you, my LORD and SAVIOR. All hail KING JESUS. AMEN
Ever heard of the Jesuits?
A LOT of people have gotten converted over the years using the King James Version Bible. The authors of this video are "oneness" "Jesus Only" people, but if there is no Trinity why did Jesus Christ pray to His Father on several occasions?
A lot of people have also went to hell because false teachers, preachers dont know how to rightly divide scripture, and lead people astray. Satan is crafty. Religion is all the different ways to go to hell. 1 Cor.15:1-4 is the Gospel of our Salvation and Ephesians 1:10-14 is our assurance. Jesus didn’t say “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only son, that whosoever joins a church, pays tithes, gets baptised, does good works, adds to the finished work of the cross, and believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life”.
Funny question. If I am not my father and mother, then why do I talk to my father on the phone on several occasions? Because I am not my father,. Otherwise, I would talk to myself.
There is no Trinity! Plus Jesus isn't God either!
NONSENSE!@@mrg466
@@mrg466You will one day regret this. I hope and pray you find peace within yourself and ask Jesus to show you who he really is.
There’s one thing for certain, every single atheist who took their very last breath no longer became an atheist once it’s too late to repent
Thank you so, so much. He was an occultist and freemason. He built the first Masonic Temple and also regularly kept men in his bedchamber.
The KJV condemns those things. Have you ever read the KJV? Do you know that King James didn't translate the KJV?
The devil always attacks the truth through his puppets on a string.
The devil uses the KJV only cult to attack the truth.
@@henrylaurel1188 I'm certainly not going to read modern fake New Age Bibles, it's not just the KJV 1611 good Bible, but all of them that are translated from the same Texas Receptus accepted source
Very interesting!! I could never understand why so many Christians treat the KJV like the holy grail. Guess it makes them feel super spiritual.
KJV is good, but not perfect. More than once Young's Literal Translation, which is also from the Textus Receptus, is clearer in presenting the deity of Christ. See below.
2 Thessalonians 1:12
YLT- that the name of our Lord Jesus Christ may be glorified in you, and ye in him, according to the grace of our God and Lord Jesus Christ.
KJV- That the name of our Lord Jesus Christ may be glorified in you, and ye in him, according to the grace of our God and the Lord Jesus Christ.
KJV adds "the", separated "our God" from "Lord Jesus Christ".
Titus 2:13
YLT- waiting for the blessed hope and manifestation of the glory of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ,
KJV- Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ
KJV is unclear, but Young's is unmistakable: Jeus is here called "great God".
2 Peter 1:1
YLT- Simeon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to those who did obtain a like precious faith with us in the righteousness of our God and Saviour Jesus Christ
KJV- Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to them that have obtained like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ
Once again, Young's is clear, but KJV is clouding a clear sound-off for the deity of Jesus. Christ is here called "our God and Saviour".
Jude 4
YLT- for there did come in unobserved certain men, long ago having been written beforehand to this judgment, impious, the grace of our God perverting to lasciviousness, and our only Master, God, and Lord -- Jesus Christ -- denying
KJV- For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ
Young's, for a fourth time, rightly translated the passage so as the reflect the Godhood of our Lord Jesus. KJV is obsolete. If ya have to have the TR, that's ok. But there's better out there than KJV.
Speaking as an atheist, with no dog in the fight, so to speak, of course the KJV is not corrupt. That's just ridiculous.
It bears the mark of its authors and the authority under which they worked but so does every bible ever translated. Some modern bibles are closer to the original manuscripts simply because we have discovered earlier copies since the KJV was created but we do not have the 'originals' of any book of the bible and so 100% accuracy is not possible.
The preface of the translator's are missing in many kjv bibles. They admitted that its not the perfect version. They lauded other previous translations.
One may want to check out Brandon Peterson, who has proved through English numerics that the KJV is indeed God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist
Exactly the KJV translators would not be KJV only. They would not have been deceived by the KJV idolatry.
Really? Who told you that they admitted it is flawed? I'd run from that blind guide!
@@DouglasNicholson-ff6ep the translators admitted its not perfect,and they accepted other translations .
@@frederickanderson1860
So, when did they admit this to you directly?
Or are you going on hearsay, propaganda?
In my 41 years, 'interpretation' and 'convenience' are some of the most terrifying words in the English language.
Truly this contested subject should have ended long, long ago. Instead the debate endures when the answer to it was declared long, long ago. Think about it !! In just about all of our ecclesiastical doctrinal statement's - ( Church manual's ) - the concept of inerrancy of the "Scripture" is addressed. This statement is declared something to this effect. " We believe the original "manuscripts" were inerrant in their conception." The corresponding action to this in our time presents itself as no less a task.
This is not to say perverted or corrupted translation's do not exist, and such a mind set in this hour seems popular and tempting as marketing exists today. Yet, thankfully "God" has declared that "HIS" Word" will forever be preserved eternally. So it is my contention that the mature among the "Body of Christ" be accountable here. We have been given a sound mind and mouth to counsel concerning this. It is us that has been charged with the responsibility of discipleship. Experience and reasoning with one another will go along way in settling this "hodge-podge" issue, remember a contentious spirit remains where it is at. With "God'' maintaining "HIS" Word, and with a rating of around 98 percent agreement between the "Text's," we should have be less saber rattling and truly be more grateful for what we have. We are so blessed as many of our believing family member's around the world are fortunate to own 1 page of "Holy Writing." We must never forget this "spirit-realm- reality. "Grace is "Gods ability and willingness to do for us what we cannot do for ourselves. Therefore grace never leaves us where it found us."
Great work!!! This matters!!!
Lies that have been told to imprison people.
The Word of God (LOGOS) is not ink and paper! It is written on the tablet of the Heart!
e-sword has 1611kjv and 1587geneva combine with regular kjv+ with strongs dictionary... that is what i like, and throw in the ESV to for a laugh.. e-sword also has the Geneva notes in the commentary section, it is possible to use the KJV and have the Geneva notes with it.
Kjv+ on e-sword has the Greek koine. Very good ❤
If you read the preface to the 1611 KJV the translators themselves said the KJV was not perfect.
The Apostle Paul - Mentions the Way of Salvation
Paul did not detest the Law of Moses. Paul actually believed in The Law,
but did not understand that God was going to bring in the grace. It had
to first be a sacrifice - and that sacrifice was Jesus Christ.
Paul did not detest The Law but quoted from Moses and explained what Moses
could not explain back then, because it wasn't time yet.
Moses means "drawn out" - and God used Moses to 'draw out' Israel from Egypt. The Hebrews spent scores of years in Egypt, and it was time to
move on.
The word 'Church' means "Called Out" - by Christ, the Church was called out
of the world to make a people for God.
In the epistles written by Paul, especially Romans and Galatians he explained the purpose of the church.
In The Law in Deuteronomy 32 - God had Moses teach Joshua and the Children
of Israel a song. This song was going to attest what the Children of Israel
was going to do, including turning their back on God.
But... in the end, God would bring Israel back. In that chapter, the Church was foretold due to Israel's idolatry which caused jealousy from God. For
that reason God used a people that were not a people to cause Israel to jealousy. The Apostle Paul explains this in Romans 9, 10, and 11.
Acts 13:38,39
38 Be it known unto you therefore, men and brethren, that through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins:
39 And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.
This video is what happens when you don't study the issue enough and you just end up making straw man arguments, hypocritical statements and regurgitating factually incorrect information. I was rather disappointed by some of the claims here....I thought you studied harder than this.
@@faithfultheology no.....
@@followintruthlj2865 you should be lol.
@@JesusNOTreLIEgion I cant be KJV only as I embrace the original languages and I believe while the KJV is the only faithful and accurate translation of the original languages there are nuances in the originals that are not (and maybe cant be) replicated and translated into the English.
@@followintruthlj2865 Since i can not say this any better than you just did , ill simply come in agreement with you , in the form of an AMEN and God bless you in the name of Jesus Christ .
So true. It's sad.that so many are so mentally lost and confused .. that a video as inaccurate as this video. Can confuse them into not reading the KJV :(
The KJV is outdated, and even KJV onlyists pastors don't understand it.
The English is too old. There are so many words and phrases that have changed meaning. The only way to understand the KJV is either a) learn Greek and Hebrew or b) £90 subscription to the Oxford Dictionary that includes the 1611 definitions. Modern Websters doesn't have 1611 definitions.
It's stupid. Use a modern translation.
I ain't joking. 100 KJV onlyists PASTORS, not children, were surveyed, and they did horrible. ONLY 9 pastors answered all the questions correctly. NINE. 9% of KJV Onlyists pastors UNDERSTAND the Word of God.
Get your head out of the ground and read a Bible YOU can actually understand.
This computerized voice over ends the watching of this video for me. Not even a minute in.
literally Lol
This man obviously does not believe that any Bible in any language he can show us is now or ever was the complete and 100% true words of God and his video is full of lots of misinformation. The things he criticizes in the KJB are also found in the Geneva bible he mentions so favorably.
Why are 4 different words mistranslated into hell?
They are not corrupt. Thank you. Your choice to reject it. Not my fault
I’ve got both versions. The best marginal notes in a Bible in my opinion would be the appendixes in E W Bullinger companion Bible
I have the E W Bullinger companion Bible too. :)
@@nobux717Bullinger was a brilliant scholar. His lexicon is a treasure. That he produced so many aids to finding what terms meant in the time they were written without the aid of a computer is impressive.
Good work. Thank you very much for this valuable presentation.
Very informative. A lot of stress on the Alexandrian family, which is the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus: which of course was preserved by the Popes. Maybe that says enough about that. It does not appear that any translation is perfect but KJV does have advantages over many modern translations. The Geneva 1560 is a even better one in my opinion.
Hello! What do you think about the 1599 edition of the Geneva Bible? do you have experience with it? if so what version would you say is the best, 1560 or 1599?
Thanks!
Jamie.
yeah, we already know you are a bigotted anti-catholic
Yes, and the Alexandrian family, so few and dubious as it is is quite leavened. Thee KJV has the HS in the very text, study it and see for self. Look at Isaiah 53:8 compare KJV to several other modern versions note contradictory translations. Look up too FROM & PRISON note how Hebrew words here have been translated elsewhere in OT as THROUGH & OPPRESSION; and what does taken from judgment mean- look up Acts 8:33 KJV here compare leavened versions here too. Consider Proverbs 25:2 here carefully, what does He glory in doing?
@@Obediah002Since when was the KJV the standard? Where is the scripture that supports the KJV only teaching? Why would any honest Bible student compare modern translations to the KJV? Would that not be falling for the double standards and lies of the KJV only cult?
"Preserved"??? More hidden and rewritten.
If that Vaticanus and Sinaiticus was the "preserved" Word of God:
Why don't they agree with each other? One would think if both came from Alexandria (which was gnostic in the region), they wouldn't have all those errors and some see that is was tried to be copied over. Even scholars have no idea the possible origin of the Codex Vaticanus.
Why did God allow it to be hidden for so long? That is saying God has mislead Christians for over 1000 years.
As far as the one I have been ability to study with the Holy Spirit's leading, KJV by far.
Back then they didn't know what any of it meant so they really didn't know what to remove or keep.
I do not believe the KJV nor the Geneva Bible are corrupt. Both camps who favor one or the other make these accusations. I realize that the KJV was mandated by James for political reasons because he hated the Geneva Bible because of its commentary notes. Both of them are from the TR and somewhat similar, so accusing both translations as being corrupt is ridiculous.
The king James bible and Geneva bible is not just corrupt but also misleading,as a matter of fact the original scriptures were just that scriptures not Latin biblica.These bibles are loaded with pagan words and they do not contain the true Aramaic- Hebrew names of the father and son, but instead is replaced with pagan name jesus-hail zeus, pagan titles Lord-baal and God-Lucifer,history is there for all and you can google some of what I have typed here for yourself,these biblias- Latin were written for Christians Catholics but humanity due to lack of studying the word sctiptures or searching for truth majority followed after Constantine's made up Christian religion and study's from those biblias Latin, instead of the original Aramaic Hebrew version which contains the original writings of the quodeshims (holy ones).This is why only a remnant will be saved, because it only a remnant that will know the truth and be set free from that truth.
The KJV and Geneva translations are the best English translated bibles in existence. The Alexandrian manuscripts, however, are corrupted.
@@PETERJOHN101 Nothing personal brother. I respectfully disagree. The Alexandrian manuscripts being corrupt is old accusations by King James or TR onlyists. There is no proof to back those accusations up not when they agree with the TR and Majority Text 94 to 98.5 percent of the time. And where there are textual variants between all three, it changes no doctrine at all.
@@rodneyjackson6181
I have discussed the issue with bible translators and looked carefully at the evidence. The Majority Text agrees better with early Church writings. The Coptic derived Alexandrian codices, once believed to be older, are in fact of a later origin. The Byzantine manuscript also appears to be free of Gnostic influences common to early Egyptian culture.
@@PETERJOHN101 the King James is not from the Majority Text. Its from the Received Text. The Majority and Received Texts are different. There are in fact about 800 differences between the Received Text and the Majority Text. The KJV, NKJV and Geneva are Received Text translations. They are not Majority Text. The things you said about the Alexandrian manuscripts are not factual but King James only misinformation that has been parroted for many years that has already been debunked.
Try this with any other Bible:
Words of God in Genesis 1
KJB = 343 = 7x7x7
KJB1611 = 344 (Standardized 1762)
NKJV = 336
ESV = 333
NASB20 = 326
NIV = 321
Words of God in Matthew 1
KJB = 49 = 7×7
KJB1611 = 49 = 7×7
NKJV = 50
ESV = 46
NASB20 = 50
NIV = 51
Amen (Entire Bible)
KJB = 77
KJB1611 = 77
NKJV = 77
ESV = 56
NASB20 = 57
NIV = 57
In + Amen (GEN/REV)
KJB = 777
KJB1611 = 782
NKJV = 758
ESV = 719
NASB20 = 707
NIV = 676
In + earth + The + Amen (Entire Bible) (earth & Amen = case-sensitive)
KJB = 77,777
KJB1611 = 77,745 (Standardized 1700’s?)
“Verily I say unto…” (Entire Bible)
KJB = 77
KJB1611 = 77
NKJV = 76 (“Assuredly, I say to you…”)
ESV = 72 (“Truly, I say to you…”)
NASB20 = 75 (“Truly I say to you…”)
NIV = 79 (“Truly I tell you…”)
Father + Son (Entire Bible) {PURE; Father = God, Son = Jesus}
KJB = 490 = 70×7
Jesus* (Entire Bible) {PURE; Jesus = Christ the Lord}
KJB = 77th with 7th Christ, 70x7th in John 10:30-36, 777th with 77th Holy Ghost
LORD + GOD + JEHOVAH + I AM + JAH + BRANCH + KING + Jesus* (Entire Bible) {PURE; Jesus = Christ the Lord}
KJB = 7777x
Jesus* + Christ (Entire Bible) {PURE; Jesus Christ}
KJB = 1554 = 777+777
KJB1611 = 1554 = 777+777
NKJV = 1551
ESV = 1504
NASB20 = 1522
NIV = 1782
....and so much more.
This didn't happen accidentally.
Purified 7 times:
1.Tyndale Bible
2.Coverdale Bible
3.Matthew's Bible
4.Great Bible
5.Geneva Bible
6.Bishop's Bible
7.King James Bible
Jesus wasn't his name...yall all think you know something..but it obvious yall need to study more.
By God's Word - when the time is near the end of this Church Period, things get WORSE, not better. With all of these so-called scholars and theologians, newer and better translations of The Holy Bible are printed. The Word of God is The Word of God. The overall message in God's Word is that the Adam race is a fallen one. This is TRUTH. The answer to that is THE LORD JESUS CHRIST. He paid the price for ALL SINS... Just listen to The Apostle Paul, and believe:
The Apostle Paul - Mentions the Way of Salvation
Paul did not detest the Law of Moses. Paul actually believed in The Law,
but did not understand that God was going to bring in the grace. It had
to first be a sacrifice - and that sacrifice was Jesus Christ.
Paul did not detest The Law but quoted from Moses and explained what Moses
could not explain back then, because it wasn't time yet.
Moses means "drawn out" - and God used Moses to 'draw out' Israel from Egypt. The Hebrews spent scores of years in Egypt, and it was time to
move on.
The word 'Church' means "Called Out" - by Christ, the Church was called out
of the world to make a people for God.
In the epistles written by Paul, especially Romans and Galatians he explained the purpose of the church.
In The Law in Deuteronomy 32 - God had Moses teach Joshua and the Children
of Israel a song. This song was going to attest what the Children of Israel
was going to do, including turning their back on God.
But... in the end, God would bring Israel back. In that chapter, the Church was foretold due to Israel's idolatry which caused jealousy from God. For
that reason God used a people that were not a people to cause Israel to jealousy. The Apostle Paul explains this in Romans 9, 10, and 11.
Acts 13:38,39
38 Be it known unto you therefore, men and brethren, that through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins:
39 And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.
hahaha, the footnotes were threats to monarchy
The facsimiles of the 1611 I have all have marginal notes. The words of the church fathers were also considered which quoted older Greek texts no longer in existence. Humble men do not claim to be anything other than feeble men. History has judged, and the KJV has proven itself better than previous and subsequent versions ("Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them." Matthew 7:20). The apocrypha were separated from the rest of the Old Testament unlike Catholic bibles, which had it mixed in with the Old Testament books, and were later removed completely. The Alexandrian manuscripts themselves were corrupt, and the Bible itself has nothing good to say about Egypt in general, and Alexandria in particular.
Easter is the correct word as it is noted that it was the days of unleavened bread, which occur after Passover, so it was already over with, and Easter was coming up.
Paul's authorship of Hebrews is confirmed by Peter in 2 Peter 3:15-16: "And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath also written unto you; (the Hebrews, that Peter is also writing to here, which all the Hebrew epistles--Hebrews through Jude are written to.) As also in all his epistles (not just that one), speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction."
The AI, or whatever is being used here, can't even pronounce Job (the name) correctly with a long "o" and not the short "o" which means employment.
Well we would do to heed the words of God in Isaiah 55:8-9: For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD.
For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts."
Depends on which manuscript you are looking at. If your Bible goes back to Alexandria you have a corrupt Bible. The KJV stands alone as one that goes back to Antioch
That’s what I’m gathering and what God is exposing to me based on .prayer for truth etc. in deep research.
Alexandria where the deity of Christ and the doctrine of trinity was defended. Antioch Arianism was taught. Denying the deity of Christ. Saying he was a created being, like the Jehovah Witnesses
@@henrylaurel1188 so says the Catholic church which my spiritual ancestors were never a part of
@@henrylaurel1188 yeah said by the Catholic Church. Let that sink in
Do you speak Hebrew and Koine Greek? Do you not think Lancelot Andrews and the other scholars didn’t know these and other languages? May The Lord open your eyes sir! Bill. Uk
Wasn't king james a gay tyrant....
Why would his book be followed
Would a gay tyrant support Romans 1:16-32 KJV?
No! It's more satanic propaganda to discredit the real Bible, which exposes them for who they REALLY are.
King James was not gay. That's just one of all the lies.
No, he wasn't a homosexual, nor was he a tyrant
😢 king James was a gay who had an intimate relationship with his cousin.
@@madmaxx5612 the KJV is the best version
I see people will believe any translation no matter what it says…
Even it is evident that it’s not original or same meaning
All Bible's are "corrupt" unless you can read Hebrew and Greek from the original of the Old Testaments or from the original Greek. Translations are always give and take. No language can be directly translated. Most translators do their best. I use several translations and a Hebrew/Greek interlinear Bible.
king James is in hell?
Revelation 22:18-19
I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book
But check into Brandon Peterson's work, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist -- people say numbers don't lie ... Brandon has a lot of free resources that proves the point that he shares with the World.
@@private-nobody6667 I've seen his work. Honestly you can find patterns with numbers in anything if you look and try hard enough.
@@janseendiguiseppiThomasMC
Nope, that's a conclusory statement without evidence in support; you have to prove that.
You said you had seen Brandon's work, did you see all of it with understanding?
i did many years of research with Greek and Hebrew numerics, and only KJV has discernable patterns; NONE of the other versions do, not even NKJV.
And Brandon, through the insights given to him, was able to show for this generation God's seal of approval of the true Word of God in English, and not the word of Satan attempting to diminish the effectiveness of God's ordained word of truth and He did it with English this time.
Under the Rules of evidence, a conclusory statement without supporting evidence is no evidence at all. Can you cite any works that have those patterns in Hebrew, Greek, and English languages like the KJV has with overwhelming proof that is undisputed? Proof matters, not opinions. Peace be with you ...
I agree with you!
Lol it says 666 after the name. That def says a lot. So it's easy for people today to make accusations about something that took place 500 years ago however this is all based on pride and agendas. Know that no version of the Bible has taken this much depth into giving you the best interpretation of the Bible in all history before 1611 or since. Every page had to be agreed upon by over thirty other men that new every language they used to interpret from. Not just Hebrew and Greek. Know that the king had nothing to do with the interpretation aside from bringing the men and transcripts together. Also note the reason was because of the tyrant religion that still exists today but that back then had a strangle hold on the ignorance of the people as they did not have a Bible in thier own language that was well written. The KJV is the only version that puts words in italics so that the reader knows they put those words in to help you understand what's being said more easily. Also the KJV is the only current version not under copyright and in the KJV Bibles you will have letters from the interpreters as well as from the kind himself all stating that the reason they wrote the Bible in English, despite massive oppositions and threats, was so that we the people could know the truth. Don't fall for the lies. God is all powerful all knowing and all present so it is literally impossible for truth not to exist in the world.
Time to get the truth out! Great job, keep these coming!
Helpful talk very
informative,and
a good share!
That said many of us
find the language
effective for
memorising
bible verses.
That and the devotion and
reverence of the
Hampton court
scholars,still
makes it
popular
for
readers
today!
This channel should be renamed Wescott , Hort and Metzger Garbage Hour
Integrity syndicate ? - In the 15th Century the Geneva format was still in the throws of establishing top left and right english in order to properly navigate the Saintly Clause secret of the " I AM that ( which ) i am ". In the beginning was the verbatim of God, but up through the line of David to the Aaronic Levitical Tribe, the Christ wouldn't take the lower case " t " for the supplication of Simon to preserve the homonym clause until he wed Lady Wisdom at age 33. Martin Luther was the Catalyst for the deaf, dumb, and blind and those fully facilitated with all their senses. But the miracle of prophecy came from the deaf, dumb, and blind cathartic to statues, stained glass, crucifix, and Rosary props that the priests passed the plate and missed the grail on as far as understanding spiritual and physical things and how object should not take precedence over Holy predicated subject. In other words, we can't sell material things to attract a congregation for money, to save our soul...we have to take up our cross, and sell Jesus in ourselves. The name of the Lord is a strong tower:....................................................
Thank God I'm using the perfect Bible.. the KJV.
czcams.com/users/shortsBHNQGv4EvQw?si=RREsC-88ySsowbnI
WOW!!! I was wondering if you actually listened to the video???? I am thinking not!!!! It completely undermines and brings into question the reliability, accuracy and usefulness of the KJV!! But yeah go ahead and keep right on thinking and believing what is not true.. it is an epidemic in today’s world!
Say the Americas that can’t even learn basic Spanish much less Greek/Hebrew to understand how badly translated the KJV is 😂
Septuagint LXX is the oldest used around 500 bce - 300 ce (even Jesus used to quote from it)
KJV comes from Masoretic texts, 850 ce, which was corrupted by roman pagans.
@@pakaliccyber7433 The Masoretic is in the original Hebrew. The Septuagint would make your Bible a translation of a translation, which makes your Bible useless.
this commentator is one of the Anti Christ
People with dogmas have crazy arguments. I've heard before someone defend the use of the word "Easter" in Acts 12. The defense was something like "The KJV translators were learned men, they knew that Passover has already passed, hence why they translated it as Easter instead".
@@MichaelTheophilus906 Geneva says Passover. Tyndale Bible,
Coverdale Bible, Matthew's Bible, Great Bible, Easter, Wycliffe Pask.
@@MichaelTheophilus906 not sure. But its a dogmatic statement by KJVonlyists.
Actually easter is disguise for the ancient goddess worship of ISHTAR. eggs at Easter arr representative of fertility as those who worshiped idols like fertility gods....the devil perverts God's holidays, his word his everything.
HALLOWEEN is evil ND should. Not be celebrated by children especially nor adults. Christmas is focus on money and material goods which was worship of nimrod and just tlike they offer gits to him on or under. Tree , so did many sacrifice their children to idols and "gods"....think about it!!!!!! ND IF YOU HAVENT NOTICED usually August, Sept October leading up to Halloween (devils nigh) there's usually a world wide troubling thing like murder...one year it's chris watts another it's Bryan laundry ...there is some satanic stuff leading up to Halloween...note the patterns of these things and easy to see the evil. But we must be simple concerning evil being wise in Good and God and truth. But we are to be wise of the enemy's tactics with all discernment and prayers 🙏
Easter was a separate pagan holiday celebrated in the Roman Empire during the time. Painting eggs in the blood of child sacrifice for their fertility goddess, doing other pagan rituals. This holiday is rooted back to the Babylonian Ishtar.
Note that this is a pagan feast.
Jesus' crucifiction was on Passover.
John 19:13-14 (KJV) When Pilate therefore heard that saying, he brought Jesus forth, and sat down in the judgment seat in a place that is called the Pavement, but in the Hebrew, Gabbatha.
And it was the preparation of the passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King!
Note that this is a Jewish feast.
Acts 12 talks about Herod the Roman backed king persecuting Peter. Herod's plan was to bring forth Peter to the people after the pagan Roman holiday of Easter, not the Jewish Passover.
The Catholic Church just rebranded Easter as a 'Christian' thing when it is actually not. To this very day, the Catholics' Easter do not coincide with the Jewish Passover. These are two separate days being observed.
That's just from the difference between Passover and Easter perspective.
Next, timeframe.
Passover is already long gone by the time we reach Acts 12.
Acts 12:3 (KJV) And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.)
Note Unleavened Bread.
The Feast of Unleavened Bread is being celebrated in that passage. This is:
Leviticus 23:4-6 (KJV) These are the feasts of the LORD, even holy convocations, which ye shall proclaim in their seasons.
In the fourteenth day of the first month at even is the LORD'S passover.
And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the feast of unleavened bread unto the LORD: seven days ye must eat unleavened bread.
Passover, and THEN 7 days of Unleavened Bread.
If Herod was waiting to bring forth Peter after Passover, it looks like he could have done it right away. It's already Unleavened Bread.
Unless.. there is an entirely different feast celebrated by non-Jews and non-Christians unrelated to Passover that is close enough that happened during or after the Unleavened Bread.
Oh look what we have here. Turns out there is this thing called Easter that the pagans in ancient Rome celebrated within that exact timeframe. I hope that our pagan backed Roman puppet king doesn't celebrate it.
Problem is Passover and Days of Unleavened Bread are used interchangeably. I believe Matthew calls the day of Preparation the first day of Unleavened Bread. This is the type of familiar or casual language we use today. For instance, when its December 20 or December 27, people typically say its Christmas, even though Christmas are technically on the 25th. If Matthew calls the day of Preparation the first day of Unleavened Bread, then Luke can use similar language as well. Passover and Unleavened Bread are the same feast. Passover can mean the days of Unleavened Bread. Also, technically speaking, the 14th is the preparation of the passover. The passover technically starts on the 15th and continues for 7 days. That's why the 14th are called the preparation of the passover. There's a parallel between the "unblemished" lamb and the "Unleavened bread". It represents the same thing. Hence Passover and Unleavened Bread are interchangeably.
Lastly, the author literally says Passover, not Easter. So if you are arguing that the KJV is correct, then you are mistaken, with all sincerity.
You have to believe on what he did on the cross and that is how did he die? He shed his blood for forgiveness of sin. Believe and receive And you are sealed to the day of redemption Ephesians 4:30 kjv.
One thing that has always stood out to me is how could a man of God ever put his name first on Gods Holy Bible? Think on that Kjv only peeps. Its King Jesus Bible!
Maybe he was a man used by GOD. Peep.
Ecclesiastes 8:4 Where the word of a king is, there is power: and who may say unto him, What doest thou? Peep 🙂
Absolutely......but no more than say those arrogant Swiss, naming a bible after one of their cantons ! 🤔😉
That's silly. It's only a means of identifying which translation you are reading. Next?
Actual king James never called it king James bible that came many many years later. Traditionally its been called the authorized version
Wow! I am shocked by all these comments on the different versions of the Bible. How rude some people are about God. A God that is literally the very essence of LOVE. Whether one uses the Geneva Bible, the Ethiopian Bible, the KJV Bible or any other Bible, if it won the hearts of men who cares which version it is. The Bible is only supposed to lead people to God and from there the Spirit of Truth which is Jesus Christ himself will teach you what you need to know.
Remember in the Bible where it talks about how Jesus always went against the Pharacees? The ones that looked more to a book of Laws than to the Spirit of God? I ask you who were the Pharacee's? They were the church folk. And the Bible says BEWARE OF THE LEAVEN OF THE PHARACEES. In other words y'all are doing the very same thing they did. If Jesus were here im sure he would tell you to stop such ignorance and LOVE one another like he commanded us to do. That is the Bible in a nutshell..... Love God and Love your brothers and sisters as you love yourself. People we can argue over which Bible to use and at the same time miss the WHOLE MESSAGE.
SHAME ON US! Father open our eyes to see and our ears to hear what the Spirit says to us.
Why some have problems with Reasoned eclecticism.
I John 5:7 is found in a majority of the Latin,
but not the Greek so out it goes.
Good will towards men
Doxology in Matthew
Without cause
God manifest in the flesh
Are a majority in the Greek but not in the Latin,
so out they go
The PA and Mark 16:9-20 are a majority in both the Greek
and Latin so out they go.
Even the “not yet” found in the two of the earliest(P66.P75) in John 7:8
some throw out.
If as an orthodox Christian you don't see a problem,
what would you see as a problem?
No, its not, Gods Word does not return void
Such an old argument....what does it matter....all religion is used for three purposes...
1. maintain control over the minds and actions of the people.
2. Maintain the income of those in power.
3. Maintain total power over the population.
Genesis 6.12 And God looked upon the earth and behold it was corrupt for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth. John who so ever eateth my flesh and drink my blood hath eternal life. The King James Version is corrupted before God. God is not a book. God is a eternal spirit that dwells within you
KJV itself was revised in 1769. Even though there maybe 20 different Modern versions available today, 50 percent of Bible buyers STILL purchase the KJV. If it ain't broke..........
That means 50 percent prefer a modern translation that they can understand. No need to boost ego
One may want to check into Brandon Peterson, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist
@@Anony584other translations are even more corrupted in its own translation adding and taking away from the word is unbelievable
@@sanalouis2620 Agreed. (Revelation 22:18-19) "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: {19} And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."
@@AinitgreatAmen 🙏
thank you it a verse for everyone not to take lightly. God bless you x
ai voices are corrupt lol
Jesus Christ is latin which was a red flag for me and the fact this is the most well respected version which is also a red flag because nothing in this world is truth! They will never promote what's real and sacred
Jesus spoke Aramaic.
@@duncanrutherford2467 Back in the day the letter J wasn't in the hebrew alphabet. When they started to translate the bibles is when they added the letter J .Yahova,YESHUA is the actual name .Jesus comes from the pagan religion
The term latin in koine Greek adds up to 666. The term tradition in Greek also adds up to 666. Such coincidences have meaning when papal Rome is recognized in Rev.17.
@@duncanrutherford2467Jesus spoke as much in common Greek as He did in Aramaic and Hebrew.
@@TheBinaryWolfcan you elaborate on the Greek for Latin adding up to 666?
No doubt the King was corrupt, but the translators were fine scholars for their time and by and large godly men. The Authorized version is overall a very good translation. Like all translations it has its problems but is good enough to be held up as the word of God. Only the original can be said to be God-breathed and infallible. However insofar as translation goes it is a worthy translation for anyone who believes and loves the truth in Jesus. It is our duty to study and discover what we can in the original. To say that the truth is so obscured in the Authorized translation on any necessary point of doctrine that we ought to dispense with it is simply not true.
Regarding the original languages the Authorized version is based on the same Greek text type common in the 16th and 17th century. If we find this line of reason to have any merit, then we ought to dismiss or question the theology of era before and after this translation came forth. The fact is that there are so many good solid Christian men over time used the AV shows the flaws of this denunciation and dismissive presentation. I can say as one who never builds any doctrine without examining the original, and for me Greek is more directly my concentrated area of knowledge I can say for certain the AV NT is a fine translation. When I have to amend or correct the AV I do so. In fact, there is no translation which cannot either be improved or enhanced in some fashion. For me all Greek manuscripts matter and must be consulted. No one manuscript text type should ever be swept aside completely and ignored. One may favor the Byzantine text over the Critical text but to simply discard either regardless of what camp you cast your lot with seems to me to be extreme and unreasonable. I use the AV and NASB, but I leave every man to his or her own conscience on the subject. History has demonstrated that the AV has been and will continue to be useful and a blessing to those who use this as their primary Bible. The KJV Only cult is another subject all together. If calling any translation, the word of God is somehow wrong or impious then let's dispense with all translations and learn to read the originals instead. Unfortunately, in order to convey the sacred truth of scriptures to anyone who does not know Hebrew or Greek would still be at the mercy of a translator. Hence, translations live on as God has ordained. Unto Him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus throughout all ages. world without end. Amen. AV.
Very good? It's perfect, go to Truth is Christ channel here on CZcams. Evidence for perfection there.
@karlbro7287 obviously you don't know Greek or Hebrew. No translation is perfect. Shows your utter ignorance on the subject.
Truth is Christ youtuber is of the KJV onlyism cult. Avoid false teachers. 1 John 5:7 is an obvious addition for political reasons. @@karlbro7287
How about 1 John 3:9-10 KJV
Are YOU (PERSONALLY) ok with the subtle, DRASTIC changes....
Concerning how everyone can know who "the children of God" are and "the children of the devil"!?
If YOU were a child of the devil, wouldn't YOU flood a nation with alternate "versions"...then begin corrupting everyone's faith in the good old KJV HOLY BIBLE?
I WOULD! and THEY...have!
Your spreading discourse among the brethren
I have this version of the bible Thank you for making this where can i get the true and accurate versions of the bible and what are their names
BestEnglishTranslations.com - Identifying the Best English Translations of the Bible. Much Love!
I am a Bible translator and recommend the NKJV, which translation is quite faithful as translations go. The NIV is easier to read but adds 15% of interpretation, which any Christian should find objectionable. The cost of smoothing out a rendering in any language is right theology.
One may want to check out Brandon Peterson, who has proved through English numerics that the KJV is indeed God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist
@@IntegritySyndicate - Here is The Savior
YaH The Heavenly FATHER (Genesis 1) HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF”
From the Ancient Semitic:
"Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3)
Ancient Semitic Direct Translation
Yad - "Behold The Hand"
He - "Behold the Breath"
Vav - "Behold The NAIL"
@@TheBinaryWolfNIV taking away a lot of verses in the bible
Jeremiah 10: The GREAT GOD
6 Forasmuch as there is none like unto thee, O LORD; thou art great, and thy name is great in might.
7 Who would not fear thee, O King of nations? for to thee doth it appertain: forasmuch as among all the wise men of the nations, and in all their kingdoms, there is none like unto thee.
10 But the LORD is the true God, he is the living God, and an everlasting king: at his wrath the earth shall tremble, and the nations shall not be able to abide his indignation.
11 Thus shall ye say unto them, The gods that have not made the heavens and the earth, even they shall perish from the earth, and from under these heavens.
12 He hath made the earth by his power, he hath established the world by his wisdom, and hath stretched out the heavens by his discretion.
13 When he uttereth his voice, there is a multitude of waters in the heavens, and he causeth the vapours to ascend from the ends of the earth; he maketh lightnings with rain, and bringeth forth the wind out of his treasures.
And it shall be, when he sitteth upon the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of this law in a book out of that which is before the priests the Levites:
Deut 17:18 (KJV)
Name one English Bible.
Name one Hebrew Bible.
That has what the Levites had in the Old and New Testament.
That is copied by a King as The Almighty God COMMANDS in the Scriptures?
The Levites didn't have the (LXX) Greek Septuagint. So Every Last Revised Version Bible is AGAINST THE COMMAND OF GOD.
No Revised Version Bible is copied by a King. This also makes every Revised Version Bible is AGAINST THE COMMAND OF GOD.
The 1539 A.D. Great Bible is Copied by a King (Henry VIII) but the Hebrew translation is incomplete using the Latin Vulgate for most of the Old Testament which comes from the (LXX) Greek Septuagint. So the Great Bible is AGAINST THE COMMAND OF GOD.
The Geneva Bible is not copied by a King. So the Geneva Bible is AGAINST THE COMMAND OF GOD.
The Hebrew Mikraot Gedolot is exactly what the Levites had copied by Kings. However, there is no NEW TESTAMENT Mikraot Gedolot.
The only Preservation of the "Book of the LORD" (Isaiah 34:16) that FULFILLS THE COMMAND OF GOD with the scriptures the Levites had in the Old Testament (Deuteronomy 17:18) and the scriptures the Levites had in the New Testament (Acts 4:36; Acts 6:7; Acts 13:1, 2, 49) is THE HOLY BIBLE AUTHORIZED BY KING JAMES copied by a King with the scriptures that the LEVITES had.
God never commanded that you have the oldest most reliable manuscripts which is a Revised Version Vatican Protestant version bible lie.
God never commanded that you have a translation that is easier to read in modern language that's a failed argument to (Mark 9:31, 32)
God never command that it's ok to have a flawed bible like all these Revised Versions are because no one has the original manuscripts. God never told anybody you would have the original manuscripts. God commanded that mankind have what the Levites had copied by a King, which the HOLY BIBLE AUTHORIZED BY KING JAMES IS.
The maker of this video does err not knowing the scriptures nor the power of God. REPENT AND BELIEVE THE GOSPEL - Mark 1:15
@Christopher Sparkes Brother The Lord JESUS CHRIST hates opposition to the truth so bad he calls it a lie.
So let's see who can tell the Truth.
Name a Revised Bible that has every jot and tittle of the Holy Scriptures that the Levites the priest had.
You can't.
Name a single Revised Version Bible to that was copied by a king.
There are none.
Thats's corruption.
Changing words - Matthew 6:19 (Vermin).
Taking out words - Ephesians 3:9 (by Jesus Christ).
Adding words - 2 Samuel 21:8 (Merab)
Contradicting Holy Scripture - Mark 1:2 (As written in the prophet Isaiah I will send my messenger...)
That ain't written in Isaiah that's written in Malachi 3:1
We you got a weak argument because you ain't been studying.
A 4th grader can see those Revised Version Bible lies.
That ain't got nothing to do with Theology.
Stop it.
You sounding like the rest of those unregenerated, uncircumcised in heart and ears resistors of the holy ghost who won't submit to God or the truth
So let me help you out.
In the English tongue (Isaiah 28:11)
The only preservation of the Book of the Lord (Isaiah 34:16) that has every jot and tittle that the Levite priest had that was copied by a king (Deuteronomy 17:18)
Stand on that TRUTH.
Learn your Holy Bible.
Judgment day is coming (Hebrews 9:27)
Stop messing around.
Amen , the King James bible is Gods word for those of us who speak english ... what else would we read...
@@onlymyself7225 Amen.
KJV is a Masonic book.
@@allwillberevealed777 You got no proof.
And the Proof that exists makes you a LIAR.
The Hebrew that the Levites had was written in 1406 B.C. in the Moab Desert (Deuteronomy 29:1), which has been copied for 3,430 years (count year "0" as 1 year).
In 1717, the first Grand Lodge, an association of lodges, was founded in England, and Freemasonry was soon disseminated throughout the British Empire. The first American Mason lodge was established in Philadelphia in 1730, and future revolutionary leader Benjamin Franklin was a founding member.
So let's see if you graduate the public school system and can count.
1406 B.C. to 1717 A.D. makes the Holy Scriptures that are copied in the Authorized Holy Bible in the English tongue 3,130 years (you count year "0" as one year) BEFORE YOUR FREEMASON DOGS.
1406 B.C. to 1730 A.D. make the Holy Scriptures that are copied in the Authorized Holy Bible in the English tongue 3,137 years (you count year "0" as one year) BEFORE YOUR USELESS FREEMASON SWINE.
We don't give that which is Holy unto the Dogs or those Swine. That ain't got the scriptures in their hearts or minds. They are adulterers and Devil Worshippers.
THE DISCIPLES OF JESUS CHRIST FOLLOW JESUS CHRIST.
You need to stop repeating folks that don't know what they are talking about because it makes you look STUPID.
And nobody can be THAT STUPID.
Repent and Believe the Gospel. - Acts 2:38
I'm assuming this video comes from an anti-trinitarian source, right?
This is why we must always go back to the original Hebrew ToRaH manuscripts to get the unchanged word (Deuteronomy 4:2, 12:32, and Proverbs 30:5-6).
There are no original texts
Greek text are oldest.
Textus Deceptus czcams.com/video/RGV1rwG0uoY/video.html
Just like you , I'm seeking truth
Could you share me some of your knowledge?
What original Hebrew text? Masoretic text are written about 1000 ad, and Greek Septuaginta was written about 200-250 before Christ.
Integrity Syndicate?
Yes definitely a “syndicate” with Jesuit overtones.
But Integrity? Go and learn what the word means (may have to go back 400 years, remember the English language “has been updated”) and then apply and see if it reflects honestly in your mirror.
The lengths that christians will go to lie to themselves is absolutely mind numbing. How could any sane person base their salvation on such a CLEARLY corrupted text? You might as well base your salvation on the Harry Potter series.
Just because there are clearly false and corrupted articles written by confused people telling you that salt is sweet, doesn't mean the only one telling you it is salty is also false.
"The lengths that chefs will go to lie to themselves is absolutely mind numbing. How could any sane person base their recipe on such a CLEARLY corrupted text? You might as well base your recipe on the Harry Potter series."
You can replace salt with whatever you want for the analogy, but you catch my drift on how we feel right?
@@steveneurwyn your feelings have no bearing on reality
@@arabianknight0000
True.
Instead, the word of God is The Truth.
And it is written as the Bible.
Psalms 119:160 (KJV) Thy word is true from the beginning: and every one of thy righteous judgments endureth for ever.
2 Timothy 3:16-17 (KJV) All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
John 1:1-17 (KJV) In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
There was a man sent from God, whose name was John.
The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.
He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.
That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me.
And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace.
For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
John 14:6 (KJV) Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
@@steveneurwyn stop embarrassing yourself and turn to Allah now as Jesus did and all the prophets before it's too late and stop wasting your life being ignorant.
@@arabianknight0000
The Islamic Al-Lah was a Quraish pagan moon deity with three daughters: Al-Lat, Al-Uzza and Manat. It was even referred to in the Quran. Muhammad came in and decided to make his own religion by editing what the locals' belief into monotheistic and enforced it under the threat of death, terrorizing and raiding cities in the Middle East, eventually conquering them.
He copied and pasted many Biblical accounts in the Quran but they were all obviously and ridiculously in error.
The account of Isa that the Muslims tried to pass as Jesus is almost hilarious. Born of Maryam the sibling of Aaron the sibling of Moses? That's thousands of Years before the Roman Empire and somehow Isa can escape from crucifiction when such things did not exist if he was truly born from such a figure. Not to mention, following Arabic conversion rules with Hebrew, Isa is Esau, not Jesus. Jesus is Yasuh. Esau is also supposed to be born hundreds of years before Moses and Aaron to a different set of parents.
Muhammad was also a penyair, a diviner, a medium for evil spirits that reveals their predictions through songs. He also got the Quran from whom he claimed to be an angel (Gabriel of all things) in a cave - in which the Bible already warned that:
2 Corinthians 11:14 (KJV) And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
And that caves are:
2 Peter 2:4 (KJV) For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;
The so called Jibril was most likely a demon imprisoned in the cave Muhammed came in to and used him to cause mayhem and confusion to the word of God, ensuring the damnatiom of many to Hell.
I discovered corruptions in the KJV over 30 years ago. Once the blinders fell off I discovered more errors, and eventually dropped the unBiblical trinity doctrine. I became a Biblical Monotheist and accepted Jesus as the man who told us the truth he heard from God. Jesus died for our sins. God cannot die. YHHW placed his words into Jesus. Jesus is not YHWH's word made flesh. John 1:14 is an error. Correction: "....and the word CAME TO HUMANITY and dwelt IN US......" etc.
If the word is not dwelling in you, then you are not saved.
Jesus is never called the word in the Bible.
The KJV along with the trinitarian dogma is false. I'm familiar with the claim that John 1.14 should be "Came to flesh", but on what grounds really? Its true in principle that the word of God came to man, but what does John say? There's no preposition as in the other cases when John uses in his prologue with regards to EGENETO. Same in reference to John 10.35 (?) where Jesus says the word/LOGOS came (EGENETO) TO (PROS) men.
It appears John is using figurative language similar to his Teacher in John 6. Jesus speaks of himself as the bread which came down from heaven. That bread is his flesh, and whoever consume his flesh will have eternal life. But of course this was figurative speech, because he says "Its the spirit that gives life, THE FLESH PROFITS NOTHING, the words I speak is spirit and life". So the bread of life/his flesh are figuratively the spirit which came down at the baptism upon him, that's why John the baptist says "he whom God has sent speaks the words of God, because God does not give to him the spirit by measure" (paraphrase - John 3).
Jesus says the bread (his flesh) came down from heaven. We know his flesh began in the womb of his mother. But this was a figure of speech for the spirit that gives life, the flesh profits nothing. When he was spiritually designated son of God, his flesh did not profit, and he would ultimately put off the flesh for a new spiritual one.
So just as Jesus figuratively spoke of his flesh coming down, it seems John in the same way speaks of the word of God becoming flesh. Not literally. But God's words were animated through the flesh. "the life was manifested" (1 John 1)
When trinitarians use John 1.14 to say God became flesh, I just ask whether Jesus' flesh also came down from heaven... When they say the word became flesh, I add, and Jesus said that same flesh came down from heaven. The word which is spirit does not literally become flesh, neither did Jesus' flesh come down from heaven. Best explanation, John is using figure of speech like his own Teacher.
Anyway the KJV is full of problems, but God can use anything at the end of the day.
Thanks for sharing your testimony! Good to see others in the truth!
Whaaatttt? How could you possibly deny the trinity? It's a theme echoed throughout the entire Bible and explicitly implied multiple times. I pray that you my brothers, give things another look.
Also if you were able to prove a SINGLE issue with the KJV you would be famous, atheists especially have been trying to nit pick it apart since it's inception, not one man has EVER proven beyond ANY doubt any, no even one SINGLE VERSE to EVER be wrong.
Said with love.
@@JesusNOTreLIEgion AMEN!!
Every single one of you is a trinity. You all have a mind a body and a soul. That's 3 things. If you can have 3 parts of yuh then why not God who created us in his image?
King James The 6th was a freemason who was in love with men freemason
Would you be able to share your source for that?
WRONG!!! KJV IS THE TRUE WORD FOR ENGLISH
False
There was no James there was no J so what was the name of that Bible do you know? it is not King James… tell the whole truth
18:15 - "A number of verses in the King James Version of the New Testament are not found in modern Bible translations."
This clown laments about alleged Trinitarian bias in the KJV, and then points to the modern versions - the modern *Codex VATICANUS* versions - as superior.
Priceless.
@@MichaelTheophilus906
The modern Catholic versions are the pro-Trinitarian corruptions. Not the KJV.
*JOHN 3:13 (KJV)*
And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man **which is in heaven.**
The modern, pro-Trinitarian corruptions remove "which is in heaven". Why? Because if "the Second Person of the Trinity" is simultaneously on earth _AND in heaven_ - where he is presumably omnipotent - then there is no need whatsoever for another redundantly omnipotent God person in heaven, let alone TWO other redundantly omnipotent God PERSONS in heaven.
*JOHN 4:23-24 (KJV)*
[23] But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him.
[24] **God is a Spirit:** and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.
The modern, pro-Trinitarian corruptions change "God is **a** Spirit" to "God is Spirit". Why? Because "God" is clearly "God the Father" here...and if God the Father - aka, "the First Person of the Trinity" - is **a** Spirit, then all the sudden Trinitarians are exposed as being worshippers of _multiple_ Spirits...because certainly "the THIRD Person of the Trinity" is **a** Spirit (who is _distinct_ from the First Person). So **"a"** gets removed and "Spirit" in "God is Spirit" conveniently becomes a qualitative noun - meaning, "Spirit" is just a quality shared by three distinct, coequal God persons.
*DANIEL 7:9 (KJV)*
I beheld till the thrones were **cast down,** and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.
The modern, pro-Trinitarian corruptions remove "cast down" and replace with its _opposite_ "set up" (NASB, NET, AMP, etc) or "set in place" (NIV, NRSV, CSB, etc) or "placed" (ESV, RSV, ASV, etc) or "put in place" (NKJV, NLT, GNT, etc). Why? Because multiple thrones being "set up" facilitates the "heavenly council" nonsense, where additional heavenly thrones are presumably occupied by "the Second Person" and "the Third Person" among others. In the _true_ English-language bible, the thrones are "cast down" because they're the thrones of the four BEASTS (which are four KINGS, v.17), not heavenly thrones.
*1 TIMOTHY 3:16 (KJV)*
And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: **GOD** was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.
The modern, pro-Trinitarian corruptions remove "GOD" and replace with plain ol' "He". Why? Because there is only "one GOD, the FATHER" (1 Cor.8:6) - aka, "the First Person of the Trinity"......and if "the First Person of the Trinity" was "manifest in the flesh", then you can stick a fork in Trinitarianism.
I could go on.
@@MichaelTheophilus906 This man have his statement of faith on the info of his channel. That would be helpfull to understand him.
"Bible truth reveals:
Jesus Christ the Son of God IS THE INVISIBLE FATHER who - without leaving heaven - came down from heaven and manifested himself as a genuine flesh-and-blood man. "
I think that should clarify what and why he is saying what he is saying.
I would just add that I disagree with that statement of his.
I think he is right in one thing. KJV supports very confused Jesus is God opinion and not a concise theological position of any kind. So if you are a Jesus is God and you are in majority in America (like 99% Americans think so and have no idea about the Trinity and still call themselves Trinitarians being basicly a Modalists like this guy) but still want to be viewed in your mind as minority - join the KJV. You will still be in majority but that conspiracy theory vibes would make you satisfied.
This or join the rapture cult. You will feel like people say that is ridiculous and you could feel like a minority yet being the majority.
I think that both of those are so psychologicly satisfying that they had to be devised by some psy-op specialists.
@@narrowpathofthetruth
_>>> "...you could feel like a minority yet being the majority."_
Exactly.
*TRINITARIANISM:* The Father compelled his personally distinct, "eternally begotten" Son to suffer and die _against that personally distinct Son's own will_ ("NOT MY WILL, but thine, be done"). Child sacrifice.
*"Biblical" UNITARIANISM:* The Father compelled his personally distinct, "human only" Son to suffer and die _against that personally distinct Son's own will_ ("NOT MY WILL, but thine, be done"). Child sacrifice.
Puh-TAY-toe. Puh-TAH-toe.
@@euston2216 That is the first time ever a try to make BU into majority. Nice tru tho.
Jesus have sacrificed himself by doing God's will. I think that is not what someone think of a child sacrifice but.... whatever.
@@narrowpathofthetruth Thanks for pointing this out, Modalists really like KJV. I used to be one of them.
If you don’t like the King James Bible don’t read it. It’s not as if you don’t have other translations to read.
tell me more...my ears are itching...
Scratch them.
But don't believe anyone who tells you that the KJV is corrupt.
Go ahead and keep spouting off, this will be evidence used “in your favor?” on the day of judgment. Your a witness against yourself!
Can there any good thing come out of Laodicea?
Great info.
Here's the difference between Daniel 11,43
43 But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans and the Ethiopians shall be at his steps.KJV
43 But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt, and of the Libyans, and of the black Mores where he shall pass.Geneva Bible
Can you see the difference?
"Mores" means "Moors" which, like "Black-a-Moor" was the term in those days for Sub-Saharan Africans
Yikes, this sort of attack on the Word of God makes me tremble. Best of luck.
Agreed. One may want to check into Brandon Peterson, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist -- people say numbers don't lie ... Brandon has a lot of free resources that proves the point that he shares with the World to overcome these baseless attacks on the KJV. Once i see all of the "scholars" attack the KJV, it makes me run toward the KJV ...
The book of Tobit is amazing.
It’s funny how it was removed for “magic.”
Do you not know GOD is the ultimate magician???
Where do you think “magic” comes from?
This is a quote from Reddit.
“In the deuterocanonical Book of Tobit, Tobias is instructed by the angel Raphael to use the burnt heart and liver of a fish to drive away the demon Asmodeus, and he also is told to use the gall of a fish to cure Tobit's (his father) blindness. Is this an example of ancient Jewish magic and are there other examples of this type of magic among ancient Jews?”
Ummm…hello?? This is completely in GODs character! Lol
If this amazing LEGITIMATE book was removed then you need to remove the WHOLE BIBLE. Lol
God told Moses to perform magic to prove he is the Almighty. Are you daft?
The whole Bible is full of MAGIC.
Moses turned a snake into a staff. Do you remember???
Moses parted to Red Sea with a staff! Harry Potter on crack much?
Elijah used his MAGICAL cloak of powers GOD gave him to summon a bear out of the woods to maul a gang of teenagers to death. Lol
Elijah asked Elisha what he wanted. To name one thing he wanted before Elijah was rapture up (the rapture is magic in itself) and he wanted Elijah’s magic Cloak.
This is insane. They didn’t remove any book for “magic.”
That’s a damned to hell lie. If that was the case the whole Bible would be removed. Give me a break,
kjv is the pure word of God✝️🙏🔥⚡️👑
It adds words
@@bigtobacco1098 what bible do you use?
@@johnnyvans_77 the kjv, esv, nasb, original niv, rsv, Greek, Hebrew
False teachers and their false Bibles preach Grace (AS) Christians commit sin.
Real gospel preachers preach (empowering) Grace over, above, and against committing sin.
Therefore, Real Preachers Preach from the Real KJV bible.
This is blatantly false.
The KJV Bible was drafted through translation AND inspection of previous translations. Why? Because it was to be the best translation ever, and to be that it needed to consider the work that was done before and be translated with the wisdom and work of wise men before taken in consideration.
Over 400 years of believing falsehood. READ THE PREFACE!!!
KJV IS THE WORD OF GOD. PERFECT!
KJV is a Catholic Bible translated from textus receptus by 47 scholars members of Anglican Church of England. Anglican Church is a breakaway of Roman Catholicism but very similar in beliefs, doctrines and practices. Textus RECEPTUS belongs to a Catholic priest Desiderius Erasmus.
@@renoaba-a6431 SORRY! RESOURCES ARE WRONG! REPENT! GOD'S WRATH IS COMING. BELIEVE ON THE SAVING GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST.. ETERNAL LIFE IS IN JESUS CHRIST. NOT IN A RELIGION. ROMANS 6:23, 1 JOHN 5:20, 1 JOHN 5:20, 1 CORINTHIANS 15:1-4, JOHN 14:6
@@renoaba-a6431 thank You
@@renoaba-a6431
The Gunpowder Plot says hi to your comment. Looks like you forgot about him.
I do not frustrate the grace of God for if righteousness came by the law then Christ IS DEAD in vain. Galatians 2:21 IS DEAD is current tense - a contradiction of the resurrection of Christ.
The KJV translators would not agree with you and all the previous translations prior to the KJV were highly recommended by the KJV translators
You can use a British accent because it's been proven Americans feel it has authority, but this will still be VERY incorrect. Even older bibles use all these terms and scriptures this guy says the KJV "added". Bounce the KJV off the Geneva and 1500 versions you'll find it's very very close. Just some stuff changed because it didn't suit the king and catholics
KJV is the best one so far!!!!!
Moron AI The NKJ version is believed to be one of the most accurate English versions of any other English Bibles. Going from Greek and from Hebrew.. multiple languages some languages do have words for others. You are incorrect about how accurate it is now. NKJVB
You are saved by grace though faith in Jesus shed blood on the cross like it says in the kjv in Roman's 3:25 Faith in his Blood and 1 Corinthians 15:vs 1 thru 4 The Gospel how that Jesus died according to the scriptures and He was buried and rose again according to the scriptures and believe this from the heart like it says in the KJV. And also Jesus said I am the way the truth and the life no one comes to the Father but by me like itsays in the KJV it's the only one I read. The other perversions are corrupted
It's easy - ALL bibles are minor historical sources.
Ask your self this --Do you have any provable, fact-based evidence of anything spiritual in the bible?
And by "evidence" I mean, NOT any hearsay, feelings, faith, beliefs, hopes, coincidences or bible stories written by man.
If you take the KJV and compare the verses in other bibles yourself, I believe you will agree with the KJV. I did just that and find the other bibles, especially that use the “Critical text” try to eliminate the “blood of Christ”, Christ’s deity, and many other things. It is not that hard to compare with the tools available.
Although I like most of the content on this channel, and that many of the people whom are refuted against in todays society on here concerning the trinity and shedding Gods light:
I'd have to say that that there were many errors in this video concerning the 1611, especially the arasmus rumor; it's a rumor, and if you look deeply enough into that subject, and look at the documents, 1john 5:7 has always been in the greek and arasmus never forged anything. He has statements.
And arasmus refuted the rumor, and even names of the highest scholars of textual criticism have admitted this error on their part against 1john.
Experts in linguistics, and texual analysis have heavily studied 1john and have concluded that 1john makes no sense in anyway grammatically or contextually, in the greek or english with 5:7 missing based off of many things. And it was also one of the leading forces on why the creed did what they did. If it were not for that main verse, the creed wouldn't have used the pagan the argument they did, so strongly.
1john 5:7 was well in circulation in the body of Christ, revelations backs and harmonized it as well.
1stjohn is a reflection of Genesis, and the gospel of john introduction and revelation and it bears record to the entire bible. Beginning to end. And scholars have acknowledged this.
The fact that the creed argued it, is the very evidence it was there, and the fact that it was there, and the church was still oneness, and refused to believe the trinity, was even further proof that it didn't mean what the creed thought it did. The written documents between the creed reveal this very truth about the early body of Christ.
Arguing that 5:7 wasn't there to refute Trinitarianism is actually a worse argument, and a bad stance.
They even exiled the arians from the council, and persecuted them too, because of the oneness stance they took that half way agreed with the trinitarian discussion; they shared similar concept but that Jesus with God preincarnate physically from the beginning or similar rather....So what does this tell you...that the verse was there..
The argument wasn't for no reason...
It was one of the strongest reasoning for their convoluted minds.
In otherwords, to believe otherwise is simply intellectual suicide.
Because what are you arguing, if it wasn't there, and what are you arguing for them if they didn't think it was there? What are you arguing against them if it wasn't their?
So what is the witness of men?
And why is the witness of God greater?
There were other errors I've found with this video, about the 1611 as well, that try to point to "sinister conspiracy" that piggyback from what I've said, because of the emphasis on 1john 5:7,
And as well as just not considering mans fallible ways.
No translation can be perfect, but I do think the 1611 is going to be the closest in as few errors as possible regarding execution, compared to any other translations, and so i believe in started where we have the most accurate grounds to then look up specific meanings of words. If not, try to look up something in an NIV in the same verse as a 1611 and let me know if you get the same meaning for the intended word given in translation; use a different word or less accurate word and you get a different meaning in the original language; because it's not accurate.
Infact I dont just think, but i KNOW, that if people are putting that much faith in man, that they are not even ever checking the Greek or Hebrew, you are doing yourself a disservice to the honesty of the original languages to begin with and God's WORD.
It is textually impossible to have a perfect translational interpretation and literal meaning in a sound way at the same time;
You have to choose one: or the other. The bibles we have, are not meant for literal accuracy, they are meant to convey accurate interpretation...
Tell me how many verses make sense to you when you read from a youngs literal translation.........
Studying is different than reading.
You cannot read any single english bible, and expect literal accuracy, so if you need to understand doctrinal specifics, you HAVE TO look up original language for literal meaning.
The bibles we have were meant to convey in spirit of the writing in HOPEFULLY the most sound way possible.
There are too many language rules we would break if we wanted what we keep arguing the sake of, and believe me, we don't really want that...
We would not understand a thing.
Stop putting faith in man, and put your faith in our oneness Father, and His son Jesus Christ, and just study.
I was saved by the WORD, but if I toss out my bible I'm still saved.
No man is perfect but Jesus Christ.
Stop trying to make man perfect.
I believe as according to even the prefacial dedicatory statements, by the translators to you in the 1611, that they did their best. That's all they claimed to do, and I appreciate their humbleness for admitting that.
If you want God's true understanding, you need to labor for it; and you are expected to.
I believe the 1611 had the best intention, and conveyed with the best intent in spirit of laboring for translation in light of balance between literal and interpretational honesty in a way that the gentiles would best grasp understanding:
Because when I read anything else, it's "just not there" : pronouns, punctuation, attitude, grammar, expression, etc.
Don't believe me; try mathew 5 on divorce in 1611, and tell me the difference in what you see in every other translation, from NASB to NIV.
On what the real issue of divorce was and what the Jews of their time were doing, and pay sharp attention to dissect those 2 verse in 1611.
Thats just one example...
Screw the spelling. I want the heart of the intent...
I believe their will never be another translation like the 1611 ever again, especially with how lost the english language has become, and the worse it is getting. If you don't think language can be so far removed, ask yourself how many translation will start to pump out according to keeping up with words in english like "mewing", and "looksmaxing" and how badly they will have to alter the original languages to facilitate translation and interpretation to that...
There is such a thing as too far:
And it's already bad enough.
But at the end of the day, we have to pick a translation, and shit, or get off the pot....
The 1611 sheds light on many things that no other translation does in many ways, as apposed to others.
If you look at every man, with the same faith you need to put in jesus, you will always think they're conspiring against you.
We live by the spirit of the law of love and liberty, for a reason. We live by spiritual understanding, spiritual expression of the law, if we so choose, but
Had Jesus not come, I think we'd be in big trouble relying on any textual integrity of english, from Hebrew and Greek, to convey even the Law of the commandments, contained in ordinances, let me tell you...
We need to know what is spiritually doctrinally important for today, because like the Law, that's our spiritual equivalent in such cases, that marks salvific difference, unfortunately with these new translations.
We should focus on what is exceptionally scholarly, and warn people about what is truly the garbage of today; If we demonize the 1611 in light of everything I've said, what will we push future believers to read from? What are they reading from now??...Would you rather them read a 1611 or an NET, NLT, NIV, NRSV, or a McArthur lordship reference bible??
We have to find a common ground and fight for something: We are all believers in the body of Christ and are more equipped spiritually than I fear the newer believers ever will have a chance to be, unfortunately, and we have to steer the younger and spiritually naive generation of believers in a direction; what direction is that going to be??
Go for the majority in accurate conveyance, keep faith in Jesus, and look up the text if the Spirit of the Father wants you to.
No translation is as faithful as Jesus Christ; but know when a translation is absolutely conspiring against Jesus, and not yourself.
Amen, Be Blessed, be well.
infact the whole purpose of the 1611 Bible was made for layman people, the common person, to have God's word and be understood in a common manner. It was not created for the scholarly and academics. They are two different things, two different types of people, two different purposes, and the common man cannot dedicate his layman life to living for God's word in the same way, and as academically as a scholar.
This refutes the very purpose of the 1611,and what it stood for, and if you don't believe that, then why did even this video record the very errors of even the scholarly...
This is what I mean.
It is okay, for the common man to be the common man and common woman, and let teachers be academic.
We should all teach interpretation to one another in good spirit, and sound spiritual understanding, we need scholars, and they're held to a higher degree by the Father.
God doesn't expect the same of us.
We will have rewards for different things down here. God wants to use us differently, but I do think that we should also use our God given discernment with the best of our God given abilities to have this understanding about things, and to put our best foot forthright.
We easily scoff at scholars, but who's really put out a better translation than the 1611 since it's inception?
Nitpicking a word or phrase is not even merely scratching the surface, in entailing what is required in and of, the translational profession.
These people a have to be capable of linguistic marksmanship, and genius level of understanding, not only in language, in multicultural understanding, but grammar, punctuation, and everything that belongs to specific said language, heritage, interpretation, conveyance, rules of said language vs our very own language concerning structure, and Ordinances. And they need to know how to conjunctualize, and deliver it. Maybe it was done with their English culture in mind, but it's definitely to be much more respected than the culture that we currently live in. They had a level of proficiency that not one scholar consistently has to this day.
Infact: what scholar do we know today, that has any extreme level of excellence in Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic today, letalone all 3 beyond, paper, and a couple early college courses, and that can even properly hold a culturally decent verbal conversation with anybody in those languages even at a street level, today; that are even still studying?
And why haven't we come out with anything better than the 1611?
Nobody today is capable; that is why.
Do we read 5 different translations with our kids, and set down the 1611?
The further out we move with our watered down and deterioration of an English language, the further away we get from understanding these ancient languages. Look where we are from the 1611.
Look where those scholars were when they made it accessible for mankind in English.
Both of our cultural differences may have their gripes, but I think the way they interpreted the scriptures was definitely reflective of something to show for importance of something we are lacking today, at the very least.
Something we lack that is incapable of reproduction. Some things are gone for good.
King James didn't want reference notes; I agree that it has done nothing but impede the reader and confuse our spirit, and sway believers on personal bias of the note makers.
How many reference and study bibles today are completely denominationally and reformationally filled with junk and lies.
There's a serious lack of appreciation,
we're an ungrateful generation;
We have nothing but trash translations today, and the 1611 was put out to a generation that had basically none, and was able to produce what they did.
The Geneva was not perfect either and in also many more worse ways than the 1611, with or without it's references. We can study what exactly was wrong with that Bible, too.
It was beyond a King-Conspiracy.
We can say what we want about their generation and their culture and religious actions, but is not an excuse to exile the 1611, they were the closest thing to a generation the was biologically conservative to boot.
Would we today, expect them to read from an NIV from a generation that can't even tell what a man is or what a woman is, when they read the horrors that are of that translation compared to what they put out for us?
They put that 1611 out for us....
We aught to think good before we accuse their culture as anxious to read from anything else.
What would they think about our laws?
Infact; If we hung tight to their very translation the way they'd hoped people would have appreciated, I think our society would even be in better shape.
I'm so sick of people out to put doubts in everybody's head, concerning God's word. The time is short, the devil is working overtime, so let's just share the simple plan of Salvation. I believe Jesus is coming back soon. Stop with this bs.
the whole idea that the KJV is the ONLY translation.. that...teaches a Triniitarianism view of God is one big lie...
example Mark 1:1 from the KJV....
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God;
ASV
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God
.in fact just about ALL translations do...
AMP
The beginning of the [facts regarding the] good news of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
AMPC
The beginning [of the facts] of the good news (the Gospel) of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
BRG
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God;
CSB
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
CEB
The beginning of the good news about Jesus Christ, God’s Son,
CJB
The beginning of the Good News of Yeshua the Messiah, the Son of God:
CEV
This is the good news about Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
DARBY
Beginning of the glad tidings of Jesus Christ, Son of God;
DLNT
The beginning of the good-news of Jesus Christ, God’s Son
DRA
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
ERV
The Good News about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God, begins
EASY
This is the start of the good news about Jesus Christ. He is the Son of God.
EHV
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
ESV
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
ESVUK
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
EXB
This is the beginning of the ·Good News [Gospel] ·about [of] Jesus Christ, the Son of God,
GNV
4 John baptizeth. 6 His apparel and meat. 9 Jesus is baptized. 12 He is tempted. 14 He preacheth the Gospel, 21 and 29 he teacheth in the Synagogues. 23 He healeth one that had a devil. 29 Peter’s mother-in-law. 32 Many diseased persons. 40 The leper. The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God:
GW
This is the beginning of the Good News about Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
GNT
This is the Good News about Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
HCSB
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
ICB
This is the beginning of the Good News about Jesus Christ, the Son of God,
ISV
This is the beginning of the gospel of Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God.
PHILLIPS
The Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God begins with the fulfilment of this prophecy of Isaiah-‘Behold, I send my messenger before your face, who will prepare your way before you’. ‘The voice of one crying in the wilderness: Prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight’.
JUB
¶ The beginning of the gospel of Jesus, the Christ, Son of God,
KJV
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God;
AKJV
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God;
LSB
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
LEB
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ.
TLB
Here begins the wonderful story of Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God.
MSG
The good news of Jesus Christ-the Message!-begins here, following to the letter the scroll of the prophet Isaiah. Watch closely: I’m sending my preacher ahead of you; He’ll make the road smooth for you. Thunder in the desert! Prepare for God’s arrival! Make the road smooth and straight!
MEV
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
MOUNCE
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
NOG
This is the beginning of the Good News about Yeshua Christ, the Son of God.
NABRE
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ [the Son of God].
NASB
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God,
NASB1995
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
NCB
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
NCV
This is the beginning of the Good News about Jesus Christ, the Son of God,
NET
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
NIRV
This is the beginning of the good news about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God.
NIV
The beginning of the good news about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God,
NIVUK
The beginning of the good news about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God,
NKJV
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
NLV
The Good News of Jesus Christ, the Son of God,
NLT
This is the Good News about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God. It began
NMB
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God,
NRSVA
The beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
NRSVACE
The beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
NRSVCE
The beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
NRSVUE
The beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ.
NTFE
This is where the good news starts-the good news of Jesus the Messiah, God’s son.
OJB
The Beginning of the Besuras HaGeulah (the Good News of Redemption) of Yehoshua, Rebbe Melech HaMoshiach [the] Ben HaElohim.
RGT
The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
RSV
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
RSVCE
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
TLV
The beginning of the Good News of Yeshua ha-Mashiach, Ben-Elohim.
VOICE
This is the beginning of the good news of Jesus, the Anointed One, the Liberating King, the Son of God.
WEB
The beginning of the Good News of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
WE
This is the beginning of the good news about Jesus Christ, God's Son.
WYC
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
YLT
A beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ, Son of God.
Perhaps the Unitarians have it WRONG!...
You are not saved bye trusting gods word.
You are saved bye the death burial and resurrection of Christ though all who have faith in the truth are saved that is not what saved them. It was christ faith unto death and his faith alone that brought him to die and pay the full price for all!!
According to scripture.