Japan's Billions $ Aircraft Carrier Is Ready To SHOCK The World!

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 2. 06. 2024
  • Japan's Billions $ Aircraft Carrier Is Ready To SHOCK The World!
    Japan’s new aircraft carriers are everything China should fear. Fun fact, Japan built the world’s first aircraft carrier from scratch. However, after being the villain of World War II which killed over 70 million people, the country had to prove to the world that it would accept defeat and be peaceful. One after the other, Japanese aircraft carriers were retired and became a thing of the past. It remained that way for decades until China poked the sleeping giant with constant threats and incidents.
    Japan, in response, thrust into action and committed huge resources of its $4.9 trillion economy - the third-largest economy in the world - to remind China of just how powerful Japan can be. The result? A fleet of aircraft carriers, armed with the most intelligent fighters on earth and tasked with destroying China should the need arise. But the world should be afraid, because as Japan returns to building aircraft carriers - a deadly time in history repeats itself.

Komentáře • 402

  • @shinitzukaaliwag6754
    @shinitzukaaliwag6754 Před 7 měsíci +35

    The Samurai is awaken!! 🇯🇵🇵🇭

  • @nertilhasani7328
    @nertilhasani7328 Před 7 měsíci +13

    Japan is best in world 🌎

  • @Timmy.d1
    @Timmy.d1 Před 5 měsíci +14

    Love you Japan, From Vietnam🇻🇳

  • @allanboyer2769
    @allanboyer2769 Před 6 měsíci +32

    The Japan of today is a world apart from Imperial Japan of the first half of the twentieth century. She is one of America's staunchest allies and a technological powerhouse. Her people are happy, healthy, and free. I have had the privilege of visiting Japan and getting to know some very wonderful Japanese people, in Japan and at home. I have absolutely no reservations about Japan becoming a military power once again. This time she fights on the side of freedom. China should think twice about poking the Asian bear. Japan and the U.S. together would be a most formidable opponent.

    • @allgoo1990
      @allgoo1990 Před 2 měsíci

      "The Japan of today is a world apart from Imperial Japan of the first half of the twentieth century.."
      ==
      Deep down inside. It's the same people.
      Samurai spirit lives on in pacifier's cloth.
      Remember, 三島 由紀夫?
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yukio_Mishima

    • @makikookamoto1938
      @makikookamoto1938 Před měsícem +1

      bro, theres no gender in countries, we ony use the term she in energy powered transportations haiyaa

  • @jackwheeler7148
    @jackwheeler7148 Před 7 měsíci +23

    Grateful Japan is our alley, stay that way.

    • @antonioabaygar-qs9gp
      @antonioabaygar-qs9gp Před 7 měsíci +2

      Go go go japan, a future world powerful nation and deadly Allies. 😅

    • @wolf-puppy
      @wolf-puppy Před 6 měsíci +3

      History repeats itself

    • @tgagaming1354
      @tgagaming1354 Před 6 měsíci +3

      True we should hope it's allies don't turn again

    • @user-uu1jw5xs3u
      @user-uu1jw5xs3u Před 6 měsíci +1

      Under US Rule, Japan is not a true Ally, One Thing All of you who don't know better, remember a nation that was ever an enemy of the US, could never truly be a friend. Now You Know ....

    • @wolf-puppy
      @wolf-puppy Před 6 měsíci

      @@user-uu1jw5xs3u when they got the chance, better they show what they built silently

  • @dasaritra007
    @dasaritra007 Před 6 měsíci +13

    Count India as Japan’s ally too… there is mutual respect and strong friendship as well as economic ties

  • @torccchaser6712
    @torccchaser6712 Před 7 měsíci +112

    The world has ALLOT more to worry about ( CCP ) than Japan. GO JAPAN !

    • @andreww1225
      @andreww1225 Před 7 měsíci

      Only china is worried about Japan

    • @kmjsjeheh1417
      @kmjsjeheh1417 Před 7 měsíci

      LOK USA FRY FAKYO MZOR 🇺🇸🏳️‍🌈💩🤢🤮 👍⚰️🔥☢️🖐️

    • @tkh2944
      @tkh2944 Před 7 měsíci

      What's your worries ?😊
      Which country have China bombed, destroyed or colonize compared to your "world" of western imperialists or colonizer ?
      Or are you unhappy that your world is not able to abuse China or make them your comfort women as you wish ? So all you can do now is fear mongering ??🤣🤣😁

    • @OFFENDYOU365
      @OFFENDYOU365 Před 6 měsíci +3

      Every normal american dude

    • @kevinhu3515
      @kevinhu3515 Před 6 měsíci +7

      That’s funny!
      US cheering for Japan against China even-though it was Japan who attacked Pearl Harbor, and it was the US who dropped two atomic bombs on Japan’s head, while China was an ally of the US in WWII, and has never invaded the West throughout its 5000 years of history ( with one exception being the mongols who was not ethnic Han Chinese)

  • @426superbee4
    @426superbee4 Před 4 měsíci +7

    It took a long long time to trust each other again. I think that bond will LAST FOR EVER

  • @dustybluemoon
    @dustybluemoon Před 5 měsíci +12

    Go japan!!! ❤❤❤

  • @kennethwilson8633
    @kennethwilson8633 Před 6 měsíci +9

    Japan may need those carriers if Godzilla ever comes …

    • @Seek-xg1vn
      @Seek-xg1vn Před 3 dny

      oh no there goes tokyo go go godzilla!

  • @TraditionalAnglican
    @TraditionalAnglican Před 6 měsíci +10

    We sunk all of Japan’s aircraft carriers in WW 2. Japan was kept from building carriers and offensive weapons because of the peace treaty that limited the Japanese to spending 1%of their GDP on National Defense. That was until 2005, when they were released from the treaty.

  • @piehound
    @piehound Před 6 měsíci +7

    Better carriers, bigger carriers, more carriers. It's impressive. Thanks for posting.

  • @sanyu2972
    @sanyu2972 Před 7 měsíci +11

    Japan still strong military power they can buy any air and wepone i believe that japan still prepare for best for any ememy but they have money .it is best make friendship

  • @user-tm6cm1tg8j
    @user-tm6cm1tg8j Před 4 dny +1

    日本とアメリカは正規空母で戦った唯一の国です。お互いが敵の空母を何隻も沈めました。正規軍の
    正々堂々とした戦いは両国が誇って良い戦いです。人類の戦争の最高到達点でした。

  • @robertledford499
    @robertledford499 Před 6 měsíci +10

    Let Japan and Germany learn from their past and let them protect their nations in this very dangerous world.

  • @patrickslesicki3546
    @patrickslesicki3546 Před 6 měsíci +6

    Excellent Japanese pronunciation. It’s a detail that just solidifies the production and demonstrates proper research.

  • @cliffords.8341
    @cliffords.8341 Před 6 měsíci +24

    Upon surrendering to the U.S. in WWII, Japan agreed to down sized their military in many aspects, therefore it wasn't Japan preventing themselves from building aircraft carriers, it was the U.S.

    • @user-uu1jw5xs3u
      @user-uu1jw5xs3u Před 6 měsíci

      Japan, Germany, and Italy are under US Rule for 1000 Years after they surrendered to US Government, therefore they are not ALLOWED to have a International ARMIES, and/or Produce Major Military Weapons or War-ships, or Aircraft Carriers etc.

    • @keenwood571
      @keenwood571 Před 6 měsíci +1

      They have been released from that!

    • @damiion666
      @damiion666 Před 4 měsíci +1

      @@jamesmarkey5946lol what does Eisenhower’s beware of mil indus complex statement have to do with this comment about Japan downsizing? 🤣

  • @bobetkalimutan8179
    @bobetkalimutan8179 Před 7 měsíci +12

    More power japan❤🇵🇭😊😊😊✨✨✨🙏🙏🙏

    • @pracylopgonzer3176
      @pracylopgonzer3176 Před 6 měsíci +1

      🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵

    • @NolascoQuiteles
      @NolascoQuiteles Před 2 dny

      Go Japan 🗾❤❤❤❤❤

  • @victoriavillanueva-tl8mr
    @victoriavillanueva-tl8mr Před 7 měsíci +9

    JAPAN THE REAL WARRIOR

  • @JamesKFuku
    @JamesKFuku Před 6 měsíci +4

    With China growing in power I think we are going to need Japans help. And I don’t think we need to worry about them using it against US. They been our allies since the end of WWII.

  • @sukiline
    @sukiline Před 23 dny

    I love Japan and will always buy Japanese goods over Chinese. Japan is one of the stronges allies, in the world of democracies.
    ❤ from Scandinavia.

  • @johnjohns9501
    @johnjohns9501 Před 6 měsíci +16

    Good to see Japan back as a force to be reckoned with especially with China being the bully that it is.

  • @user-tw5qr7eg7f
    @user-tw5qr7eg7f Před 7 měsíci +5

    I'm Proud to be an AMERICAN! I won't forget the people who died for me! I'd gladly STAND -UP and defend our flag. GOD Bless the USA!

  • @alanbeckham9093
    @alanbeckham9093 Před 6 měsíci +8

    Love how the carriers are flying Japan's old rising sun flag.

  • @jrebz2329
    @jrebz2329 Před 6 měsíci +7

    Kudos japan ❤ from Philippines 🇵🇭

  • @combatmedic-cc5bp
    @combatmedic-cc5bp Před 6 měsíci +13

    The Free World welcomes Japan as an ally 🇺🇲

    • @oguzhan9424
      @oguzhan9424 Před 6 měsíci

      Except USA is not anything near "free" nor an "ally"…

  • @calipcasi567
    @calipcasi567 Před 7 měsíci +8

    Philippines love Japan in super power in Asia💪

  • @charlstontupaz7493
    @charlstontupaz7493 Před 6 měsíci +11

    Go go go Japan💪💪💪👏👏

  • @winstonsmiths2449
    @winstonsmiths2449 Před měsícem +1

    I recently learned that days before and leading up to the bomb being dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshimo, leaflets telling civilians to evacuate were air dropped over both areas. These warnings were largely ignored. Death toll was never the goal, but a demonstration of what could happen if Japan continued to fight.

  • @user-mo6cl3qo2q
    @user-mo6cl3qo2q Před měsícem +1

    The sleeping lion has woken , we love you Japanese,

  • @SamsungAs-qh7uc
    @SamsungAs-qh7uc Před 2 měsíci +2

    ❤❤❤ i love JAPAN.❤❤❤❤

  • @barnabasmurphy8496
    @barnabasmurphy8496 Před 2 měsíci +1

    I have always admired Japan. I here Japan is good country, their movie making is very weird. I have seen some their weird movies. 🇺🇲🇮🇱🇯🇵 We Americans are with you and with our Jewish brothers and sisters and children. We Americans are standing with you our Japanese brothers and sisters and children. All of our little children are our future.

  • @AnadaConceicaoS.S.Ribeiro
    @AnadaConceicaoS.S.Ribeiro Před 7 měsíci +13

    All the men and women on this ship very talented. Thank you for your service and God bless. . 🙏🇺🇸🎃👏👏👏⚓

  • @sindalz
    @sindalz Před 6 měsíci +3

    Japanes people great people and best alley.

  • @billynixon2645
    @billynixon2645 Před 6 měsíci +5

    Rise of the
    Empire of Japan

    • @sharonlavery7656
      @sharonlavery7656 Před 6 měsíci +1

      Rise of Japan..
      Empires are not really a good thing these days..!
      Look at (awful) Russia.......!!

  • @user-ul5xd9yw4w
    @user-ul5xd9yw4w Před 4 měsíci +7

    the best thing intelligent in japan and to japan give peace in the whole WORLD are ever without mark.

  • @leap1451
    @leap1451 Před 6 měsíci +1

    I’m so glad Japan is our partner ❤🇯🇵🇹🇼🇺🇸💙🇯🇵💪🏻🇹🇼💪🏻🇺🇸💪🏻💙🇺🇸🇯🇵💙🇺🇸🇹🇼💙USA 💙JAPAN 💙TAIWAN 💙

  • @andrewray9200
    @andrewray9200 Před 6 měsíci +5

    The HMS QE AND HMS POW have the same power units and the same top speed.

  • @mrhassell
    @mrhassell Před 6 měsíci +11

    JS Izumo (DDH-183), the lead ship of in the Izumo class of the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF), as of March 2022, is officially classified as a multi-purpose operation destroyer.

    • @chadlongnecker630
      @chadlongnecker630 Před 5 měsíci +2

      Our relationship with Japan is wildly different than it was 80 years ago. I feel that in a real crisis we would be great allies, so I am glad they are arming

  • @sanildev6408
    @sanildev6408 Před 5 měsíci +2

    Japan Powerful air craft

  • @easyalpha1
    @easyalpha1 Před 2 měsíci +2

    And it flies too!!!!

  • @tjabdon606
    @tjabdon606 Před 6 měsíci +9

    That’s why I drive Japanese assembled Acura and Hondas they are in my opinion superior

    • @force419
      @force419 Před 5 měsíci +1

      Yes and white too great

  • @user-qm9qh1vq5f
    @user-qm9qh1vq5f Před 7 měsíci +7

    Go go go Japan

  • @bebzbuslon6666
    @bebzbuslon6666 Před 7 měsíci +4

    I stand wt Japan , make urself very very powerful, many pilipinas in Japan , I had daughter her Japanese husband grand children sisters nephew nieces, God bless Japan,

  • @cudatom9290
    @cudatom9290 Před 6 měsíci +6

    1:20 During World War I the British navy developed the first true aircraft carrier with an unobstructed flight deck, the HMS Argus, which was built on a converted merchant-ship hull. A Japanese carrier, the Hosyo, which entered service in December 1922, was the first carrier designed as such from the keel up.

  • @blacklabel810
    @blacklabel810 Před 7 měsíci +13

    The Japanese battleship is amazing, the most amazing yacht I've seen, thank you for sharing

  • @aljephoneabao3968
    @aljephoneabao3968 Před 7 měsíci +5

    I am a Filipino hope to be a Crew of izumo of japan

  • @yingxiong7716
    @yingxiong7716 Před 7 měsíci +5

    Hey F 35 is the most excellent or the most crashes Sir

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 Před 7 měsíci +3

    I like it they are powerful and intelligent

  • @0426ADOLFO
    @0426ADOLFO Před 7 měsíci +3

    GO GO Japan so stop bullies country .

    • @karennye3492
      @karennye3492 Před 7 měsíci

      You do know this is fake, right? It's BS what they're saying. I think it's pretty funny what they're saying

  • @TraditionalAnglican
    @TraditionalAnglican Před 6 měsíci +11

    American Supercarriers can go a lot faster than 30 knots. I know someone who watched the CVN-65 Enterprise blow by his vessel when both were at Flank Speed, and I’ve heard sailors used to water ski behind the CVN-68 Nimitz…
    The CVN-78 Ford is not going to be slower than these two!

    • @msimon6808
      @msimon6808 Před 6 měsíci +1

      I wouldn't say a lot faster. Just faster. I was an RO on DLG(N)25 Bainbridge - a nuke frigate in the Enterprise Battle Group along with the nuke cruiser Long Beach. We were designed to keep up.

    • @KEB129
      @KEB129 Před 5 měsíci

      Just 13 knots is enough for water skiing.

    • @ScottMcDonaldInVictoria
      @ScottMcDonaldInVictoria Před 4 měsíci

      On a private tour of the Nimitz in 2013 during CVN-68’s Tiger Cruise on a courtesy call to Victoria BC, I was told that executing a 45° turn at 55 knots, they put the edge of the flight deck into the water. We were in the CIC (bridge) at the time which is elevated above the flight deck and I was thunderstruck at the thought and power of that deck hitting the ocean’s surface at that speed.

  • @reyoeljohnmanalo9235
    @reyoeljohnmanalo9235 Před 6 měsíci +4

    Go Go Japan!!!

  • @jerryjaygalan1257
    @jerryjaygalan1257 Před 6 měsíci +2

    The wake up of sleeping samurai

  • @David-wk6md
    @David-wk6md Před 6 měsíci +1

    I think if as long as we don't cut off their oil they'll play nice.

  • @user-wd4je8fp3l
    @user-wd4je8fp3l Před 6 měsíci +2

    Japan ilabas nyo na ang gundam 😅 I love japan

  • @Kapplerartbloomingdale
    @Kapplerartbloomingdale Před 6 měsíci +2

    Go Japan!🇯🇵

  • @wraithgamez
    @wraithgamez Před 6 měsíci +3

    Wow Never knew Japan design & built the First Ever Aircraft carrier ❤ as always America will be the ones today enjoying said prestige

  • @billwong5357
    @billwong5357 Před 5 měsíci +2

    # Very Well narrated with details !!

  • @7steps0804
    @7steps0804 Před 6 měsíci +2

    wow! the real warriors

  • @timpeterson2738
    @timpeterson2738 Před 7 měsíci +32

    I've been looking into the F35, this jet is packed with so much advance weapons systems that it is completely insane! 1 jet can literally dominate 3 plus squadrons continously for hrs as needed. The enemy won't even know what happened.

    • @timjamesg158
      @timjamesg158 Před 7 měsíci

      LOL dear me, the problem you have, is, just like all Americans you never even ask yourself the obvious questions? Questions anyone, must always, not only ask, but more importantly, understand, before even trying to suggest anything at all, good or bad, about any military hardware.
      Questions like, how can the F-35's or even the F-22's, for that matter, detect, track, or target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR? -- You make the claim, you've looked into it, right? So, tell us all, exactly how these US aircraft detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR? Isn't it amazing that I can tell you, that you have no idea?
      Yet, if you really had looked into anything at all, or even just asked yourself that one question?, then you'd start to understand the reality is nothing at all like you all think! So, let's quickly explain what I mean...
      The facts, (that seemingly none of you even understand), are, that stealth alone, defeats high-frequency (short wave), radar, by absorption and deflection, but it does NOT defeat low-frequency (long wave radar)!
      So regardless of the aircraft's RCS (radar cross-section) you all believe means so much, when they're being detected, tracked and targetted by long wave radar, they're far from stealthy, and just light up and stand out like a beacon in the night.
      To detect, track, and target other stealth aircraft from BVR, can be done with long-wave radar, (but it must also be enhanced), to remove all background clutter for targeting purposes.
      Well, neither the APG-77 radar, used in the F-22, or the APG-81 radar, used in the F-35, have any kind of long wave radar?
      Hence, they can't detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR! - An obvious fact, the US Air force will be fully aware of. Only it seems the reality is, that when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there weren't any other stealth aircraft to think about as a potential threat!
      So, what do these US aircraft like the F-22 - F-35 actually have available to them to detect any other stealth aircraft from BVR?
      The answer to that question is, they have AWACS (that can transfer all targetting data to the F-22 - F-35's in real time). Yet we find that's not possible today. And this is why actually understanding your enemies real abilities, becomes extremely important, critical in fact, as I'll show you.
      The reality of this (Russian rubbish), you all claim, is that Russia has a new 5th generation radar, (with enhanced long-wave radar), their new Byelka (2band) radar used in SU-57. They can detect, track, and target enemy stealth jets from BVR easily today. The USA CAN'T!
      Russia have designed, and they've developed, the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen. They've embedded L-band AESA radars into the leading edges of the wings.
      And this L-band AESA radar "data" gets processed in real time (through extremely powerful Russian computers), being significantly enhanced, removing all background clutter, seeing them perfectly able to detect, track, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR.
      This new Russian technology, along with its very impressive range parameters, and it's jamming ability (over very large areas) make this aircraft deadly to all other aircraft types. Yet we read you all, claiming it's, what is it? Rubbish, relying on old washing machine microchips, right?
      Only they can detect, track, and target all enemy stealth fighters, (and detect them long before they even enter Russian airspace), from much greater distances today, with "real-time" data from all those massive Russian ground (long wave stations), that are all protected with the networked S-400 defensive system.
      Russia's new (2band) radar, covers all frequencies across all channels, used for tracking, targeting, and also for jamming (over large areas). It's part of Sh121 multifunctional integrated radio electronic system (MIRES) on board the SU-57.
      We must also understand, that Russia tested this new radar suit in the SU-35's, so they also have the option of fitting this radar into the SU-35's. Seeing the SU-35 at no disadvantage against either the F-22/35. As although the SU-35 can be detected, tracked, targeted and shot down from BVR by the US stealth fighters, the SU-35 equipped with this new radar is just as able to detect, track, target and shoot down the US stealth fighters from BVR.
      Seeing the all-important, Russian massive advantage in BVR missile range, plus the excellent manoeuvring, neither the F-22/F-35 have, as more than critical, (if you're going to avoid simply being blown out of the sky).
      The truth you uneducated people all hate so much, is, this Russian 5th generation radar design, has very clear, and very real potentials to provide genuine shared multifunction apertures, with applications including...
      Search, track, and destroy, missile mid-course guidance, against low signature aircraft, identification of friend or foe with secondary surveillance radar.
      Passive angle tracking and geolocation of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters at long ranges.
      Passive angle tracking and geolocation of L-band AEWC - AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
      Passive angle tracking and geolocation of hostile (i.e. Western) IFF and SSR transponders at long ranges.
      High-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters.
      High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas.
      High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
      High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas. (Effectively, and completely, neutralising the USA's use of AWACS for their detection).
      This Tikhomirov NIIP L-band AESA radar, is an extremely important strategic development, and it's a technology which once fully matured and deployed in useful numbers, will render narrowband stealth designs like the F-22 & F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and many, UAVs, as highly vulnerable to all flanker variants equipped with such radars.
      -- Just Russian crap?, indeed it is, if you're an idiot. HILARIOUS!! LMAO!

    • @timjamesg158
      @timjamesg158 Před 7 měsíci

      So do explain, why it is we read so many of you Americans making comments just like yours, that are all completely wrong, really illogical, and so bizarre it only ever shows you all up, as incredibly naive, and completely immune to such obvious propaganda?
      What is it all about? Typical US propaganda, usually consists of silly falsehoods, and fake misinformation claims, or just twisted truths, like the F-15, is said to be unbeaten in A2A combat.
      It's true (ish), only when we look at every aircraft shot down by an F-15?, we find that none had any offensive capabilities, and most had little if anything defensive, many without even a basic radar, meaning, you'd be absolutely stunned if the F-15 didn't shoot every one of them down.
      So it really is, once again, and as always, just a very silly, and meaningless remedial propaganda claim. Yet, there is another aircraft, that's also unbeaten in A2A combat, and has faced off against aircraft just as capable as itself? Only we don't hear about that, because it's not American! This is how pathetic you people really are.
      The British Sea Harrier is, actually, the only aircraft unbeaten in A2A combat, that has faced off against worthy, viable opposition. And that really is a huge factor, that's worth knowing, unlike the F-15 propaganda claim, that you'd be shocked if it hadn't managed.
      You should all be questioning why the US made it illegal to sell the F-22?. The US government seemingly wants it believed, it's because it's so good, they don't want anyone else to have it?. Yet, that actually makes no sense at all, none, not even a little sense.
      As the facts are, they've no idea what's around the corner in modern military technologies, and with the speed we're seeing new military tactical hardware being designed, developed, and created today, it could well have made great sense to sell the F-22 at some stage. (If it actually works)?
      If it worked, they'd have been able to recoup many of the resources spent on the aircraft, if not the resources in their entirety, even a profit. Only, there's another, and much more likely reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22?
      If it is, just as I suspect it is, a "lemon", that was intended to be their leading front line strike aircraft, (that's failed), yet because of the cost/expense to build them, they can't just write it off, so the USA have then only used the F-22, for propaganda purposes? Then what better way of preventing anyone else from finding out that it actually doesn't work, and really is a lemon, than making it illegal to sell?
      Logically, that's the only possible reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22. It can only be, because it's a failed aircraft, that was intended to be their leading front line 5th generation strike aircraft. Well, 19 years, the US have had the F-22 in service, (and they've been in wars the entire time), yet they've never used it?, not once!
      And more interestingly and very telling was, just after Russia arrived in Syria in 2015, the USA removed every one of their F-22's from right across the Middle East, Iraq, Tukey, UAE and Jordan. Absolutely no doubt about it, I guarantee we'll never see the F-22 involved in any sort of real war scenario, or even involved in any major sortie, because it's basically junk.
      They've even trashed all the infrastructure they had in place to build more of them.

    • @timjamesg158
      @timjamesg158 Před 7 měsíci

      Just read what you try to claim? It's idiocy, idiocy on a scale of idiocy, not seen before. If, as you claim, "you've been looking Into the F-35"? Then maybe you can explain, that we also see the USA, still unable to produce and build a VTOL capable fighter aircraft? Yet, they are trying to lie about this?
      The F-35B was claimed by the USA, to be able to do what the Harrier could do, while also being supersonic, stealthy, with modern avionics systems, etc, this is what we were told, and it's exactly why we designed our new carriers without ramps.
      Only one of the biggest technical headaches, the British always had when building the Harrier, was the VTOL, - transferring from ''lift'' (downward nozzles) to forward flight (rear-facing nozzles) and flying away from the lift-off.
      Apparently to achieve it took the British a hell of a lot of technical work, (three - four months at a time, over 3 years). Look up all the variants they made, but they never gave up, and they finally figured it out.
      I said long before we ever saw the F-35B, that it wouldn't be VTOL capable, (even with the Rolls-Royce lift engines), because the USA has tried many times before, and failed each time, only ever managing to produce and build the British Sea Harrier, able to do so.
      Every US airframe (and there have been many), have all failed. I'll show you what I mean, as otherwise so many of you Americans get confused, it's bizarre! LOL
      At 7 mins 50 seconds, you'll watch a Harrier perform a proper VTOL. Copy and paste “2013 MCAS Yuma Air Show - AV8B Harrier Demo” into CZcams search. Watch it from lift off, to more importantly, flying away from the lift-off, and you'll see the transfer of nozzles take place.
      You'll not find any footage of the F-35B doing this anywhere. Yet we do see Lockheed Martin trying to suggest it is VTOL capable?, when it, so clearly, is not.
      Copy and Paste “First F-35B Vertical Takeoff Test” into CZcams search. You'll only see it lift off, hover, then return straight back down. You'll never see it fly away from the lift-off.
      Believe me, if it could, we'd see it doing so in every piece of footage we have on the F-35B - like we still see on all the footage of the Harrier doing so. But you'll never find any footage anywhere of the F-35B doing that.
      Oh, and please, anyone that wants to try and show me the F-35 fly into a hover, and fly away from that hover (as a way of proof it can VTOL)?
      Please don't, because that has nothing at all to do with a VTOL. To hover, and to fly from a hover doesn't require the transfer of the nozzles, as hover, is achieved while remaining with forward flight (rear facing nozzles) with pitch and yaw, to find your centre of gravity to control the hover (all CPU controlled today). No transfer of nozzles is required to fly from a hover.
      And we don't want or need to read any Americans trying to claim it's not necessary? LOL, (while forgetting, they're to be carrier-based aircraft), meaning any slight damage to the deck or ramp, and they can't get any jets airborne? Defeating the entire purpose of having the aircraft in the first place! You can't ever lose an entire carrier in battle, for only minor damage?, whatever next?.
      So, why do we see the USA doing this? It's obviously because, the US is still a country that's never managed to produce & build a VTOL fighter aircraft.
      Britain did so in the late 50s, Russia did so in the late 60s, the USA has tried and failed numerous times, so it seems this time, they're going to try to lie about it LOL.
      That country is a travesty, man! But it does show us, that Lockheed do indeed produce propaganda aircraft, as the F-22 is exactly the same... A failed aircraft, so today, only being used for propaganda purposes!

    • @timjamesg158
      @timjamesg158 Před 7 měsíci +3

      What could the F-16 achieve in Ukrainian airspace?, or in fact, how long could an F-16 survive in Ukraine is the only question worth asking? For me, I'd estimate the F-16 would have a life expectancy of less than 30 minutes combat service, over Ukraine, and that's extremely generous.
      You only need to understand what it would be facing. Regardless, that we already know it can't survive the old S-300 anti-air defences, it would then need to survive against, for example a Russian SU-35E? How could it survive, is the only real question?
      Actually understanding your enemies abilities, becomes extremely important, critical in fact.
      The SU-35E is classified a "4++ Generation Fighter" - though its true capabilities go well beyond the original/current crop of 4 & 4+ Generation mounts like the F-15, 16, 18, Eurofighter Typhoon, French Dassault Rafale etc.
      The SU-35E only falls short of the standard adopted for true 5th Generation by its lack of stealth, however, the SU35s military tactical value, has increased massively, and its overall combat ability has broadened considerably.
      The SU-35E, has a forward and rear-facing Phazotron radar system capable of simultaneous tracking of 34 targets up to 92 miles (148 km's), and even over uneven terrain. Its cockpit design contains a colour CRT display as well as HUD (Head-Up Display) along with digital fly-by-wire (FBW) capability, with quadruple redundancy (the onboard computers will always find four different ways to achieve the desired results of its combat mission). Its avionics also include an Irbis-E passive phased array radar system.
      The F-16 is, therefore, nothing but an obsolete, unusable aircraft against Russia, and in every possible way imaginable, and the US must know this, really.
      And that shows us the real level of desperation we really are seeing from the USA.
      Outclassed in every department. But hey, you all believe you're awesome, right? So good for you, you just enjoy your oncoming undeniable annihilation. -- it's going to be hot, red-hot, as well as quick and decisive.
      That good old arrogance, is, finally, sealing their own fate, to the history books, as it was always going to.

    • @jiizjard8791
      @jiizjard8791 Před 7 měsíci +2

      ​@@timjamesg158Do you know AIM-120 AMRAAM???🎉

  • @jamiejones6994
    @jamiejones6994 Před 5 měsíci +1

    That thumbnail is wicked

  • @user-lj8vw6mg5s
    @user-lj8vw6mg5s Před 2 měsíci +1

    Ford class has a 90 aircraft compliment

  • @stevelee2504
    @stevelee2504 Před 5 měsíci +1

    Where's dat lil mouse Hashimoto😂

  • @srmltd2yt
    @srmltd2yt Před 5 měsíci +1

    7:50 That is the USS Carl Vinson CVN 70 depicted not the USS Ford, I was on the Carl Vinson in 1987-1989

  • @josebaeza5128
    @josebaeza5128 Před 6 měsíci +1

    Japan is so funny calling that a helicopter carrier 💀 200 iQ

  • @norvin3186
    @norvin3186 Před 7 měsíci +6

    Go Japan!

  • @timbaumann9046
    @timbaumann9046 Před 2 měsíci +1

    At least this time they are ON OUR SIDE!!!

  • @arnulfodayanan9668
    @arnulfodayanan9668 Před 7 měsíci +1

    Yes japan

  • @pinasako6710
    @pinasako6710 Před 7 měsíci +2

    Wow

  • @olivierkhuoy7559
    @olivierkhuoy7559 Před 4 měsíci

    Verry good japan go

  • @chandlermitchell3326
    @chandlermitchell3326 Před 27 dny

    Japan could build another new aircraft carrier class to replace the Izumo because the Type 003. And I think Japan should build a modern aircraft carrier for the defense of their country for the future.

  • @GioDiezaJr
    @GioDiezaJr Před 2 měsíci

    Nice

  • @felicianotantoy3932
    @felicianotantoy3932 Před 7 měsíci +4

    Tama japan to suport alay Dapat ang Philippines matron aircraft carriers para pag dependsa sa WPS dapat mabigyan tayo pagkakataon mag bili tayo sa UK or ibang bansa para lasts ang budget sa philippinas

  • @LarryDickman1
    @LarryDickman1 Před 5 měsíci +1

    And yet we have our manufacturing doing on in China. Countries that imported from China paid for their military build up.

  • @dondonmagno3443
    @dondonmagno3443 Před 7 měsíci +5

    Thanks japanese government we love you arigato.

  • @JebJohnson-dg6yo
    @JebJohnson-dg6yo Před 5 měsíci +1

    😂😂😂 the thumbnail, it wouldn't even float

  • @scotts8684
    @scotts8684 Před 7 měsíci +17

    The only problem I see with these carriers are China's huge inventories of anti-ship missiles which can easily reach Japan. I hope they will have defensive systems that can protect them from these missiles. China has so many of these missiles that such defensive systems may not be enough. I can only hope that we will develop lasers powerful enough to take out these missiles and they can be installed on these carriers. On American warships they are fed by the nuclear power of their engines. These carriers are diesel. Will they provide enough power for such lasers to destroy the missils or will these lasers just dazzle the guidance systems of the missiles?

    • @JamesKFuku
      @JamesKFuku Před 6 měsíci +2

      Yeah the Chinese hypersonic missiles are scary. I think for now we would need ships along side of our carriers, its sole purpose is to protect it.

    • @Michael-um5pd
      @Michael-um5pd Před 6 měsíci +2

      We already have the laser's, not only mounted on ships but also on 2 types of aircraft

    • @allanboyer2769
      @allanboyer2769 Před 6 měsíci

      True. We are MUCH more advanced than the public is led to believe. Even the directed particle beam technology of the '80's (star wars) which is old technology now, was much more advanced than the public was ever told. When Trump told the world that the United States had weapons the likes of which the world has never seen, he was not kidding.@@Michael-um5pd

    • @robertcarter2310
      @robertcarter2310 Před 5 měsíci

      Well. These missiles are going to be used up with in 6 months of fighting I think China has around 3,000 of these missiles! No way of making more because of the cip in bargo so what will China do then ! Throw rocks

    • @herbb8547
      @herbb8547 Před 5 měsíci

      There is no evidence those Chinese "hypersonic" missiles can hit anything - especially a moving ship. China claims they can, but China has claimed many things that have been proven to be false. Also, American made air defense systems can shoot hypersonic missiles down as was demonstrated in Ukraine.

  • @brianpeacock9444
    @brianpeacock9444 Před 6 měsíci +2

    It doesn't mean jack what kind of carrier they build when they are "NO MATCH" up against the United States Top Gun Fighter Piolets skills and training and just flat out intelligence. Not to mention the advanced stealth technology and THE BEST FIGHTER JETS ON THE PLANET! PERIOD

    • @WmTyndale
      @WmTyndale Před 6 měsíci +1

      the US military has not won a war in over 75 years. Good fireworks show though!
      Reply

  • @user-xw3cj7md2i
    @user-xw3cj7md2i Před 7 měsíci +1

    From Philippines,,want to join your crue..

  • @3rdeyeEagle
    @3rdeyeEagle Před 6 měsíci +1

    funny... instead of buying these 10 no's of underpowered f35.... they can build a new aircraft carrier....

  • @user-vy8fy3cz1s
    @user-vy8fy3cz1s Před 4 měsíci

    Go Japan

  • @arturodigman8453
    @arturodigman8453 Před 7 měsíci +2

    I ADMIRED all aircraft carrier but not Chinese aircraft carrier..

  • @Nathan-ry3yu
    @Nathan-ry3yu Před 5 měsíci +1

    I like the carrier of the front cover. I wonder how much it will cost to build something like that.

  • @Impo-zb5tm
    @Impo-zb5tm Před 6 měsíci +1

    Pls don't attack the Philippines japan😊😊😅😅

  • @genjimccorkle5518
    @genjimccorkle5518 Před 5 měsíci +1

    Check mate…. lol. 🇺🇸 🇯🇵

  • @davidwilliam6551
    @davidwilliam6551 Před 7 měsíci +4

    JAPAN AS DO BEST WEAPON N DO BEST FIGHT THIN FORCE IN DO WORLD ALON WITH DO BEST TECKNALEGE U GO JAPAN SHOW CHINA U ARE DO BEST WHEN IT COMES TO FIGHTING USA

    • @craigconey9971
      @craigconey9971 Před 6 měsíci

      I take it English is not your first language 😂

  • @426superbee4
    @426superbee4 Před 4 měsíci +1

    I trust Japan to not to start a war with the UNITED STATES EVER AGAIN. We came very close to each other

  • @zuker1952
    @zuker1952 Před 7 měsíci +2

    You said Chinook but showed ch46. Chinooks are ch47.

  • @user-vt5pr9zo8n
    @user-vt5pr9zo8n Před 4 měsíci +1

    wow

  • @shawntepitts488
    @shawntepitts488 Před 7 měsíci +2

    OH my God

  • @teejayman215
    @teejayman215 Před 2 měsíci

    Japan, the eunic servant of USA 😊

  • @ChrisAlvis-ow7bq
    @ChrisAlvis-ow7bq Před 6 měsíci +1

    China wok the samurai and it looks like the Chinese gonna find out something

  • @finnpruitt7608
    @finnpruitt7608 Před 5 měsíci +1

    The Americans are not scared

  • @brealistic3542
    @brealistic3542 Před 6 měsíci +4

    Japan has getting major problems with China and North Korea. Japan is a solid partnership of the USA and the West. Japan is doing what it needs to protect itself. It would have preferred to let the USA do that as as before as the costs is very high indeed.

    • @sharonlavery7656
      @sharonlavery7656 Před 6 měsíci

      I'm curious, could Japan or Australia join NATO, if they wanted to ?
      Or is it more anorthern hemisphere thing ?
      We are all allies, might be better having Japan in NATO than, say, Hungary?

  • @brianvanveghel7815
    @brianvanveghel7815 Před 6 měsíci +2

    You mentioned just one American carrier design when the United States has two different classes of carriers. The other class of carrier is the Nimitz class. Maybe we have three if you consider America class amphibious assullt carriers they can carry 20 F-35 Bs, which is about the same amount of fighters that the Japanese carriers can carry.

  • @joewinoliva8528
    @joewinoliva8528 Před 6 měsíci +2

    The Rising Sun Return

  • @honfmeilingfleet957
    @honfmeilingfleet957 Před 7 měsíci +4

    in Modern Warships i like Izumo better than Gerald Ford

  • @user-fj7tt7le2s
    @user-fj7tt7le2s Před 2 měsíci

    Astounding now those pesky mainlanders will have sleepness nights.

  • @SimengkYoeo-xk2xe
    @SimengkYoeo-xk2xe Před 7 měsíci +1

    ❤oh okay😊🎉

    • @SimengkYoeo-xk2xe
      @SimengkYoeo-xk2xe Před 7 měsíci

      Greatly enjoyed this impressive experience Jesus Love Japanese

  • @siyajin23
    @siyajin23 Před 7 měsíci +19

    ccp can't even build an operative carrier without stealing technologies or know how to build it properly :(

    • @GenZVision3931
      @GenZVision3931 Před 6 měsíci

      China made it's so called 5th gen aircraft Chengdu J-20 by stealing USA's technology.