Thankk you for the information and suggestion about the leadership, but the reason i watch this video is for my homeworks from my college. Thank you again By the way....
Am very happy about this Leadership skills and style, hope it will help me to pass my exam and be able to apply it to my work responsibilities to achieve results. Thanks
This is a very nicely produced video and I love the use of examples to illustrate the principles. It is important to note that the development level (e.g. D1, D2) is GOAL or TASK SPECIFIC, not role specific. The progression of development level moves through the curve for a particular goal or task. Even a new employee could be at e.g. D4 for a task that is required within their job, if they had brought with them transferable experience from a previous role. Conversely, when promoted to a new position (e.g. into a management role), the employee may have tasks and skills within that new role that are brand new to them. They are likely to be D1 in this new task (although diagnosis and confirmation of that requires discussion and alignment between employee and manager/leader).
Hi Gary, thank you so much. Yes, other have pointed out their interpretation of the situational leadership and I do like your detailed explanation. I am going to highlight your comment so other students can benefit.
I appreciate your effort in all of your videos. This has been a great supplemental resource to the course text and easy to comprehend. Thank you for keeping them short and interesting. :)
A new student would be a good example. However I am basing this example on me (real life experience). I needed a job to pay through my university. I was eager to learn but didn't know any pizza making skills. If you watch the entire video and also fielders model (another video) it stated how I moved up the ranks to be a store manager at the same pizza restaurant. I appreciate the comment. Thank you for watching the video!
Why do we have to be more supportive and directive for someone in who have low competent but has confidence shouldn't we only focus on developing competent by focusing on directive behavioral Same time those who have low competent and confidence why only directive behavioral and less supportive
I have a question. (at 1.51 min)You said at D1, the employee has low competency and low commitment, but D1 in the graph says high commitment. please explain.
Situational Leadership is a registered trademark of the Center for Leadership Studies. Please use the registered trademark symbol after those words. Thank you, Glenna Withem, Copyright and Permissions Manager, Center for Leadership Studies.
Hi Juan thank you for the comment. Since this is contigency theory I am trying to use an example that best fits the theory. If you read more about the house theory it further explains that not every theory of leadership can be applicable. Its upto to the use to best pick the theory. You do have a good point thought. Thanks again.
Can-Indian Channel you said in the video when you started to describe the D1: “low commitment and low competence “ But the truth is ; D1 as per shown in the diagram, he/she is low competence but high commitment “ This is as any new comer for any job
@@youseffarrouh7541 Thank you again for clarification. I agree with you to some extent. Situational leadership is a contingency model means application to real life is not based on experience as a whole. For example if you were to get a job at Google you would have high commitment and high interest on the first of the job. However if you get a job at restaurant your interests may be low. Hence I agree my experience may not completely replicate the chart, I was trying to use the best example to explain the theory. I do really appreciate you taking the time to comment.
Can-Indian Channel D1 is as per Kenth Blanchard is low competence but high commitment. Now if you are talking about something new, so it is not D1 Any how it is your call to correct your video or not
@@youseffarrouh7541 you are absolutely correct. However my example may be a little off on this one aspect. However if you read article by Erick Wright on Performance Improvement, he states Kenth Blanchard model can be rearranged to suit your purpose. My Video is explaining Situational Leadership using his model. The situational leadership has been formalized multiple number of times, K Blachard is not the originator of the original model. But yes I agree where my point could be misinterpreted, thank you for pointing this out.
Thankyou you save my life .I will use this example in my exam☺️☺️☺️
Thank you Sushma, I am glad the videos were helpful.
Excellent video and brilliantly explained. Thank you.
Thank you Alex!
Thank you for the video. The examples really help to make it more clear.
Thank you Part Time Economist, I really like the content on your channel too and the concise succinct explanation you provide.
Thankk you for the information and suggestion about the leadership, but the reason i watch this video is for my homeworks from my college. Thank you again By the way....
Thank you Rio, I am glad these were helpful with your homework.
Am very happy about this Leadership skills and style, hope it will help me to pass my exam and be able to apply it to my work responsibilities to achieve results. Thanks
Olajide thank you so much for your comment. Good luck with the exam!
Best example ...best video of this topic
Thank you so much
Priya Jaiswal thank you
Very Useful one! Thank you Author(s)! I like to use this video in class room.... Hope my students will like it a lot!!
Thank you Sir!
This was a great video. Thank you. Fantastic examples. x
Thank you Sarah!
@1:48 he explained D1, saying it involves low commitment while the diagram shows high commitment..
Thanks Adam you are correct, there are others that pointed out this error as well.
best video on the topic. thanks alot!
Simon Brandt, thank you very much!
This is a very nicely produced video and I love the use of examples to illustrate the principles. It is important to note that the development level (e.g. D1, D2) is GOAL or TASK SPECIFIC, not role specific. The progression of development level moves through the curve for a particular goal or task. Even a new employee could be at e.g. D4 for a task that is required within their job, if they had brought with them transferable experience from a previous role. Conversely, when promoted to a new position (e.g. into a management role), the employee may have tasks and skills within that new role that are brand new to them. They are likely to be D1 in this new task (although diagnosis and confirmation of that requires discussion and alignment between employee and manager/leader).
Hi Gary, thank you so much.
Yes, other have pointed out their interpretation of the situational leadership and I do like your detailed explanation. I am going to highlight your comment so other students can benefit.
Keep up the good work!
@@garysteeples7225 thank you so much!
Good example 👍🏽it expalins better.. Thank you
Thanks so much Hasan!
Thanks man...Much help for my MBA exams....My professor is a Harvard teacher and he doesn't explain this well :)
Thanks so much Rohith. Yeah most university do not apply thier teaching as a means for students to learn --unfortunately
Very good. Will share your channel. Very helpful. Keep it up. Cheers! Peace!
Thanks so much Vkj
Explained in very nice manner
Thanks V!neeT
Thanks for very detailed video.
Thanks Diyani!
Why your examples are so simple and accurate 😝♥️ thank you this was very easy to understand .
Thanks, that's how I learn too :)
@@CanIndianChannel
Thank you just keep this up.
Thank you so much sir and you explained in clarity.
Thanks Mayur
Sir adding to it can you make a video on conflict and negotiations in organizational behavior because am not able to understand
@@mayurgoel3755 i will make one soon
I appreciate your effort in all of your videos. This has been a great supplemental resource to the course text and easy to comprehend. Thank you for keeping them short and interesting. :)
Kristal Atkinson, I appreciate your kind words of appreciation. Making these videos really helped me (with my research & articulation).
Dear,
Do you have the subtitle of this clip? I need translate to Vietnamese for my student. Thanks so much
D1 is supposed to be high commitment though.A better example would be a new student intern who lacks experience but is excited to learn.
A new student would be a good example. However I am basing this example on me (real life experience). I needed a job to pay through my university. I was eager to learn but didn't know any pizza making skills. If you watch the entire video and also fielders model (another video) it stated how I moved up the ranks to be a store manager at the same pizza restaurant. I appreciate the comment. Thank you for watching the video!
I noticed the same - explanation a bit confusing
It's a great video
Thanks so much Vanitarani
woow this was sooooo helpful thank u sooo much
Thank you Dilini!
Excellent and very clear
S R thank you!
Why do we have to be more supportive and directive for someone in who have low competent but has confidence shouldn't we only focus on developing competent by focusing on directive behavioral
Same time those who have low competent and confidence why only directive behavioral and less supportive
Thankyouuuuuuuuu so much Sir 🙏☺️🤗
You are welcome Anshu!
Thank you for taking the time to comment!
I have a question. (at 1.51 min)You said at D1, the employee has low competency and low commitment, but D1 in the graph says high commitment. please explain.
I think it's an error. It should say low commitment.
Situational Leadership is a registered trademark of the Center for Leadership Studies. Please use the registered trademark symbol after those words. Thank you, Glenna Withem, Copyright and Permissions Manager, Center for Leadership Studies.
Glenna Withem, thank you I will add that in the description and on the title shortly. My sincere apologies in missing this information.
Thanks sir
Thank you Priya
The voice over says D1 is low competence and low commitment but the figure shows D1 as low competence and HIGH commitment. Which one is it?
I made a mistake on the voiceover you are correct to catch it
@@CanIndianChannel thank you for clarifying. Im taking an IOP course and another video did the same thing so I was confused.
Awwsomet
D1 is mistaken according to the diagram
Hi Juan thank you for the comment. Since this is contigency theory I am trying to use an example that best fits the theory. If you read more about the house theory it further explains that not every theory of leadership can be applicable. Its upto to the use to best pick the theory. You do have a good point thought. Thanks again.
Superwiser wideo uniwersity prowided
Thank you so much Yashua
Can-Indian Channel thank you! Your wideo helped me pass my test 🙏
@Yashua Fly I am so happy to hear that and messages like these inspire me to make better content
There are many mistakes in this video. it does not follow the concept of Blanchard at all!!!
Hi, thank you for the comment. I had the script reviewed by three of my teachers (all with phd's). Can you point out the issues/concerns?
There is a mistake in D1 my friend
Hi Yousef thank you for the comment. Can you please describe further what is the mistake?
Can-Indian Channel you said in the video when you started to describe the D1: “low commitment and low competence “
But the truth is ; D1 as per shown in the diagram, he/she is low competence but high commitment “
This is as any new comer for any job
@@youseffarrouh7541 Thank you again for clarification. I agree with you to some extent. Situational leadership is a contingency model means application to real life is not based on experience as a whole. For example if you were to get a job at Google you would have high commitment and high interest on the first of the job. However if you get a job at restaurant your interests may be low. Hence I agree my experience may not completely replicate the chart, I was trying to use the best example to explain the theory. I do really appreciate you taking the time to comment.
Can-Indian Channel
D1 is as per Kenth Blanchard is low competence but high commitment.
Now if you are talking about something new, so it is not D1
Any how it is your call to correct your video or not
@@youseffarrouh7541 you are absolutely correct. However my example may be a little off on this one aspect. However if you read article by Erick Wright on Performance Improvement, he states Kenth Blanchard model can be rearranged to suit your purpose. My Video is explaining Situational Leadership using his model. The situational leadership has been formalized multiple number of times, K Blachard is not the originator of the original model. But yes I agree where my point could be misinterpreted, thank you for pointing this out.
I know you ALL spotted it even though you want to pretend that you didnt lol
Thank you for your kind comment! Although I am not sure what it means :)
Please remove the music
Sorry bhai!
This video is high school level information. Yawn.
Thanks man, I love your flooring company videos