Bill Gates on next-generation nuclear power technology
Vložit
- čas přidán 4. 09. 2024
- In Wyoming, where coal and natural gas power its electric generation plants, Bill Gates and his energy company TerraPower are planning their first cutting-edge nuclear power plant. He talks with correspondent Barry Petersen about building a more efficient power plant that creates significantly less nuclear waste.
"CBS Sunday Morning" features stories on the arts, music, nature, entertainment, sports, history, science and Americana, and highlights unique human accomplishments and achievements. Check local listings for CBS Sunday Morning broadcast times.
Subscribe to the "CBS Sunday Morning" CZcams channel: bit.ly/20gXwJT
Get more of "CBS Sunday Morning": cbsn.ws/1PlMmAz
Follow "CBS Sunday Morning" on Instagram: bit.ly/23XunIh
Like "CBS Sunday Morning" on Facebook: bit.ly/3sRgLPG
Follow "CBS Sunday Morning" on Twitter: bit.ly/1RquoQb
Subscribe to our newsletter: cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T
Download the CBS News app: cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8
Try Paramount+ free: bit.ly/2OiW1kZ
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com
This has to be done. Energy needs to be produced within the concept of production in-depth: Nuclear, Wind, Solar, Geothermal, Hydro, etc.
The problem isn't energy or the people losing jobs, the problem is the people don't know how to embrace the upcoming new technology that is more than anything a tool for people. It is not your enemy. Breathing clean air and keeping workers safe is better than money but when your lifestyle of owning a home and eating like a middle class worker is at stake it is easier said than done. So how can workers transition while feeling like it was worth it? trust me, i'd rather be a middle-class wealthy person in the year 3010 than a billionaire in the year 1980.
"This has to be done! We must not change our lives or sacrifice in any way all that matters is we CONSUME CONSUME CONSUME CONSUME CONSUME CONSUME. You are everything that is wrong with America today.
@@java4653 broke people always trynna tell me what to do....
No just nuclear.
@@java4653 So---- you oppose solar and wind on the same basis I suppose? That it provides the economic base for people to CONSUME?
What is the alternative by which you live your life?
I see you don't mind plugging in to the internet?
Terrapower has an interesting approach. I hope the same will happen for Thorium based reactors...
Clean. Affordable. Feasible. Safe. What's holding us back?
@@grandlotus1 Currently, regulations and the general fear about nuclear... But Thorium should not be in the same category as Plutonium, for instance, as it is right now.
@@grandlotus1 It’s a mixture of post 3MI miss information campaigns funded by fossil fuel companies and mismanaged personnel by the current nuclear executives in the US.
Nuclear waste can also be recycled to the point at which it may only be radioactive for around 200 years, which is entirely manageable from a storage and safety point of view.
That's a good thing if true, so the material they use has a half life of 100 yrs
How big is the expense?
There’s new nuclear power plants that can run off nuclear waste. It will generate less electricity than pure uranium but could solve two problems with one solution.
Shushh! You are not allowed to speak facts and truth! You may get cancelled!
I don’t like to agree with Gates but the US needs a lot more nuclear power plants. Maybe not this exact design but nuclear in general. The ones we have a extremely safe and reliable.
you may want to wait till he builds it, see the cost and if it really works better than the current generation of nuclear plants
@@clarkkent9080There aren’t really a lot of unknowns here. The only real unknown in the energy sector lately is the highly variable price of fossil fuels.
@@davew2040x He wants to build a completely new reactor design in a place (Kemmerer Wy) where only 2,500 people want to live and construction is limited to 7 months because of the weather. Good luck getting constructors to move there when there is no infrastructure to support the 2,000+ workers required.
The locals hate Gates and I am sure they will not be happy with the drugs, crime, and everything else that comes with 2,000+ construction workers.
The reality of what is known about new nuclear construction in the U.S. today is listed below.
If you live in the U.S. here is the reality for the last 4 “state of the art” Generation III Westinghouse AP1000 ADVANCED new nuclear power projects and spent fuel reprocessing in the U.S. over the last 20 years. The AP1000 is fully approved by the NRC for construction and operation. The only NRC requirement is that the plant be built per design documents…..seems simple..
The Southeastern U.S. is super pro-nuclear MAGA, has zero anti-nukes, and 100% media, local, and political support.
The MOX facility (South Carolina) was a U.S. government nuclear reprocessing facility that was supposed to mix pure weapon grade Pu239 with U238 to make reactor fuel assemblies. It was canceled (2017) in the U.S. After spending $10 billion for a plant that was originally estimated to cost $1 billion and an independent report that estimated it would cost $100 billion to complete the plant and process all the Pu239, Trump canceled the project in 2017.
VC Summer (South Carolina) new nuclear units 2&3 were canceled in 2017 after spending $17 billion on the project (original estimate of $14 billion and 2016 completion date) with no clear end in sight for costs or schedule. Four managers on the project were charged with 16 felony counts, including conspiracy, wire fraud, securities fraud, and causing a publicly traded company to keep a false record. The CEO of the project is serving 2 years in prison, another manager just got 15 months in prison, and the others are awaiting trial.
Vogtle (Georgia) new nuclear units 3 &4 at 110% over budget and schedule (currently over $34 billion with an original estimated cost of $16 billion). Mid way into the build, the utility stated that had they known about the many costly delays they would never have chosen nuclear. They last year long delay, according to the project management, was because thousands of build documents were missing. The first unit started in 2023 with Vogtle being, for its output, the world’s most expensive nuclear power plant. BTW, that first unit is now shutdown for repairs and the second unit is still a year away from startup.
Please google any of this to confirm.
If you can’t build new nuclear in the super pro-nuclear southeast U.S. then where can you build it?
Maybe one lesson here is we can agree with some things and disagree on others while we continue to be civil and respectful as we all go about our lives.
We all have more in common with each other than we think.
Absolutely not.
"If you don't move forward you die". He got that right! 🙂
Forward? More blind consumption is not "forward". There is no "forward".... cars & mass consumption are an unsustainable mistake. The insanity of Blind Consumption is killing ecosystems globally.
Amish: exists
If you take advice from Bihl Gaytz, you die!
Really? Mother Nature seems to have things figured out pretty well.
If you are near death in a hot desert never accept a class of cold water from billy boy, never
It's hilarious reading these bots praising Bill Gates like he's not up to no good.
They abhor him but not his money.
Spoken like conservatives
Pea green with envy and hate, of course.
no one giiives a f about that nerrrds money,,i mean,,LOOK AT him,,,,😆😅🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sodium reactors have been around since the beginning. They were used in submarines in the 50s alongside the water reactors. Water reactors were selected for mass use because of weight savings, and the civilian industry just went along with using that design.
Thanks to Nixon. He decided that pressurized water reactors were good for defense, and this was the primary reactor made commercially. Liquid salt and other designs went away.
It was also due to the lack of bomb grade material produced in a pressurized water reactor vs a sodium reactor. Proliferation was an issue. The meltdown in Simi Valley also looked really bad for the sodium reactor, and the operators coming from the Navy all knew about the pressurized water reactors so that helped. USS Seawolf was sodium cooled, but she was prone to leaks in the cooling system and it was replaced with a pressurized water reactor. The Soviet alpha submarines ran on a lead bismuth reactor. Those are the only submarines that had non-pressurized water reactors installed that I know of, only USS Seawolf had a sodium reactor and it was an abject failure.
You can actually think Hyman Rickover for the pressurized water reactor as the primary naval reactor design.
@@cle_roknn3742 Are you talking using a thorium blanket near the sodium reactor? Wouldn't distance, moderators, and fuel determine how much fissionable material was made? Back before Korea got the bomb, they cracked open an old reactor and started scraping their fuel rods for plutonium. I'm curious why you say that? Pure sodium explodes in water, and so having that in a sub might be a bad idea. Also, I am pretty sure Nixon when focusing on pressurized water reactors was also considering the making of weapons grade materials for bombs.
@@putinscat1208Not Nixon . Rickover pushed for water reactors because the use in the navy was a safer design and the Rickover wrote the book on the operation of the reactor . They call admiral Rickover, the father of the nuclear Navy. He is also credited with creating military standards for purchasing equipment for the navy that would survive in war time conditions. It was a big fight by the contractors to stop him , they lost. 🇺🇸
@@rayRay-pw6gz I think Nixon had a hand in killing liquid salt reactors though. Whether Nixon pushed or helped light water reactors, I am not sure. But the liquid salt stopped after the 1960s.
Somehow I dont think the guy who made Windows 95 is going to solve the energy crisis.
These "new" reactors have been around for over 50 years. Both the US and Soviets had these types of reactors in artic bases. They are finally releasing it to the people.
Well if this is an improvement in fission then bring it forth.
Programming a basic interpreter doesn’t mean you’re the smartest person ever. Neither does being rich.
Gates dropped out of Harvard in order to start Microsoft. That's a pretty good leap into the unknown by itself, but you don't know Gate's mother, who was on the Board of the University of Washington at the time.
I heard a story about when Bill dropped his plan to drop out of Harvard on his mother.
"But Bill," she reportedly said," I know you like computers, but when you graduate from Harvard YOU CAN GO TO WORK FOR IBM!"
Gates didn't make billions by programming a Basic interpreter. I suggest he made billions by having the guts to stand up to his MOTHER!
A significant number of people who are impressed by monetary wealth have been bowing at the feet of Bill Gates since the early 90s, showing over thirty years of fealty.
he made billions by stealing open source software, then patenting it and nickel and diming billions of people over the course of 3 decades@@SeattlePioneer
Or he shafted the little guy on he way up the money ladder
Molten salt reactors are the future. We need this 100x and we need it NOW
Very smart Mayor. You have to keep looking AND moving ahead.
Not really that smart. More like going with the flow once a billionaire decides to use your town as the place for his nuclear power plant. What’s a mayor going to do, other than put a positive spin on something that’s out of his control. That’s my opinion anyway.
LOL. This is meaningless. Idiocracy is here now.
@@lewstone5430 you're a good example of why right wingers are losing all the elections
@@fredwerza3478 I don’t get it. I’m not a right winger if that’s what you’re suggesting.
@@lewstone5430 I know this might be a bit late, but I agree with you. Obviously, the initiative is very good for the town, if the initiative wasn't going on, then the town would just be another died out pit stop in Wyoming on your way to Yellowstone, as all the young men leave for greener pastures. The Mayor though, has no hand in it, there is nothing indicative of his intelligence here, Bill just chose his town for his plant, and he went along with the flow, riding out the wave of glory and positive press.
Why is anyone even paying attention to old bill…..his wife spelled it out clearly when she divorced him
You still mad about the jab? You were wrong on that one too. 😂😂😂
Go away Bill.
Thank you CBS for suggesting that energy policy should be guided by friends of Epstein.
Our last president was also buds with Epstein and we know what a horn dog he is
No one mentioned the traitor TFG, why do you have to bring the fake billionaire into this?
@@buckbenelli8 There is a long list of Epstein friends, both republican and democrats, as well as the last president. With power and money you are above the law
What about your connection with Jeffrey Epstein though?
Anything related to this Bill Gastes monster is not being done for our best interests.
Why is he a monster?
@@asturianix9820 He is on the team that cares more about profits and power, than genuine help for humanity. They help a bit, sure. But if something will help for 50% and give them more power and money, they would choose that over something that helps for 100% and gives them some power and money.
@@asturianix9820get a clue
Why is he not in jail?
Well Smith has indicted him but that is up to a Jury.
Call Bill gates anti Republican or controversial, but he sure is a national treasure who’s benefitted this nation more than 99 percent of the population.
So you shouldn’t call him anti-democracy and a monopolist?
Why is this college dropout the nation's expert on EVERYTHING?!?!
Because he's the chosen one by the globalists. They picked him to be their pitchman. He's their Billy Mays.
He comes from a family of money & political connections.
He’s not. He hires people to teach him enough about a subject (and he probably reads a book or two on it) that he sounds brilliant in interviews.
Bill Gates should be explaining his relationship with Epstein before we start talking about tother things, Are you going to interview Prince Andrew and Bill Cosby about their thoughts on things today as well?
We really don't care what bill gates has to say
Comes online in 2030? Sure takes a long time to build a power plant like this. But I think this is the way to go for the future.
First of a new design always takes a long time. The regulatory/inspection/safety process is a bear.
It was supposed to be built in China in order to lower the cost then using those models do it in USA faster and more reliable BUT THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION BLOCKED IT. IF TRUMP HADN'T DONE IT THEN WE WOULD HAVE IT BY 2025. I have been following this prior to COVID as I am investing $.
Anybody else remember hearing about molten salt reactors way back in like 2010? and now it's finally happening on a large scale. wild.
telling us about it since 2016 but actually building nothing is hardly what I would call happening
I don't mean to brag, but I have the exact same degree in nuclear physics that Bill Gates does.
LOL, me too!
Except you are not a world renowed tech genius with access to the best consultants in the world about the subject
@@lrsperanza I think he's a business man, not a tech genius. Wozniak might be regarded as a tech genius. Gates, though he had a good understanding of computers when he started, was hardly a scientist or groundbreaking engineer. What did he invent?
The reason he is well known is because he is a billionaire. If you are a billionaire and you invest in new things you will get press coverage, and people in need of research money will come to you. Not all billionaires invest this way, which is why most don't get this type of press. But it is effectively bought, and not given on the basis of accomplishment.
He’s a genius in the business of technology.
@@Jorbz150 - He actually coded the original Microsoft BASIC. That's what launched the company.
so this guy is not only a medical doctor, a technology innovator, and a business magnate, he is now a nuclear physicist.... this guy is amazing..... totally not a fraud or anything
Uh he literally made Windows, MS Word & Excel, plus saved Apple when it was failing by investing...
yes clearly he is worthy to have his head frozen upon death so it can be reanimated when we have the technology so he can save us from future pandemics!@@MarcusAurelius7777
Yeah, it's not like you can hire experts and have them do things for you. All Gates did was donate money to vaccine research.
I just struggle to believe that Bill Gates has good intentions.
No, no! He expects nothing in return . . . except your soul.
What make you believe that? What’s your source?
@@andybaldmanThe COUGH....
@@andybaldman The terrible job he did on the pandemic.
jeffery epstein's buddy interviewed by cbs, guess what they didn't ask him
Yeah this guys is most definitely a puppet. But yeah, if some good technology comes out of it, then at least we have that.
The disadvantage of that is that agreement with his "buddies" will come before actually genuine love for progress and for humanity.
For example he could have chosen to create a state of the art Thorium based reactor. But 'no'... he must make his military industrial complex buddies happy of course. 😊
Haven they asked Trump? I didn't think so.
Thorium Reactors is what we should be building.
Bill gates / criminal
He's worried about his island of f toys not having power.
So tired of Bill Gates.
stop giving Epstein buddy attention.
Ironic subscriptions you got there considering they all enabled another one...
As someone who has been involved in nuclear power for over twenty years, I am pleased that nuclear power is finally getting the investment needed to move forward. Liquid sodium reactors are the future. The problem has always been antiquated licensing regulations and a general fear of nuclear power in the general public fueled by some media. To be clear there are negatives to nuclear power as it is being utilized today. Pressurized water reactors require large, extremely expensive containment buildings. They also use U-235 as fuel which is problematic for several reasons but primarily because of the long half-life of the waste material which is mostly U-238 a fissionable fast fuel and Pu-239 used in making bombs. It is this last reason the U.S. has resisted the development and deployment of liquid sodium reactors. Even though they are much more efficient and less expensive because they operate at nominal pressure and do not require expensive containment structures they also do not produce the plutonium that nuclear powers need for their weapons programs. There are a few other companies developing this technology including one that is developing small to medium sized modular power plants that can be built almost anywhere. The fossil fuel industry is lobbying hard against the adoption and deployment of this technology. It will be interesting to see what advances are made in the next decade. It is a vital tool in combating climate change. We just have to have the courage to fight coal and big oil to use it.
For some one who says they worked with and are knowledgeable about nuclear, you want to start building new technology reactors and make claims on something that has not been proven commercially in this country.
@@clarkkent9080 You don't seem to read very well. I explained WHY they haven't been ALLOWED to be licensed commercially in this country. They don't produce weapons grade plutonium but THAT is what the government wanted for its nuclear weapons program. A technology doesn't have to be "proven in this country" to be a viable option to solve any problem. Electricity wasn't commercially viable in this country until it became available to the masses. This type of reactor is safer and can be built for far less money than the pressurized water behemoths that exist today. In fact, pressurized water reactor plants are so expensive to build, the only way they are commercially viable is through government subsidies and costs passed on to consumers in the form of higher electric bills. Liquid sodium reactors can be built at a fraction of the cost and actually lower costs per kilowatt hour even compared to fossil fuel plants. BTW, the first liquid sodium reactors were built in the United States over fifty years ago. The Navy built one and installed it on a submarine to test its viability on that platform but decided because of technical requirements not to go ahead with the project. Do you think the U.S. Navy would have done that if they didn't have proof the technology would work? I toured that prototype and studied the principles behind its design and operation. Yes, I do know a lot about nuclear power.
@@mysticwanderer4787 For someone that claims to be involved in nuclear power, you don't know much history and spew baseless conspiracy theories.
BTW, the ONLY sodium reactor even remotely planned in the U.S. is the Terrapower Natrium reactor and it uses U235 and it does produce plutonium.
Now if you are referring to Thorium, try learning some history.
Where do people keep coming up with this BS that Thorium was abandoned and Uranium based PWR/BWR were chosen so we could make bombs?
Hanford Wa. has been making weapons material, at their 9 reactors, since 1944, 12 years before the first U.S. commercial nuclear plant became operational and their weapons production reactors are very efficient graphite moderated reactors and DO NOT produce any electrical power.
Savannah River site SC. Has been making weapons material since 1955 and their 5 production reactors are very efficient low pressure heavy water moderated reactors and DO NOT produce electric power.
Thorium was tried at Shippingport and Indian Point commercial reactors in the 1970s and abandoned as too costly compared to Uranium.
Weapons production reactors are NOTHING like U.S. commercial PWR or BWR power reactors and commercial power reactors have NEVER been used to produce Pu239 for weapons, since there has never been a need beyond what the efficient weapons production reactors could provide..
The U.S. currently literally has hundreds of TONS of Pu239 (takes less than 20 pounds per weapon). The U.S. has so much that 34 tons of weapon grade Pu239 is being treated so it can eventually be disposed of at a cost of billions.
Your comment is like saying automobiles use gas engine because the military wanted jet fighters. God help us that people base their knowledge on social media and YT videos.
@@mysticwanderer4787 BTW, unlike you, I actually worked for 40+ years in the nuclear industry and was licensed to operate 3 different reactors and worked at five different facilities. And from your comments, you know very little about nuclear and are just spewing things you saw on a YT video
@@mysticwanderer4787 There was ONE U.S. demo test liquid sodium reactor built 60 years ago not 50 and it was abandoned for technical reasons.
Navy reactors do not have any of the redundant systems or safety systems of commercial plants so there is no comparison. AND the sodium reactor used in the Seawolf was replaced with a PWR....so much for it being better.
Epstein's Buddy
I read several years ago, that Bill Gates company was going to use Type 4 reactors that can use depleted spent uranium fuel rods, is that still the case?
Never take any advice from a billionaire whose tech company cannot and will not creat a decent-quality OS for your PC
Hopefully he'll do to nuclear technology what Elon Musk did to SpaceX in terms of cost
Absolutely
Always go with what's cost effective. There is a hidden value there.
What do you have up your sleeve, Bill??
Three headlines of ‘coal plants closing’ does not necessarily lead to the conclusion ‘fossil fuel use’ is dying out in the U.S.
#Journalism
#YellowJournalism
#ChickenLittle
Wait, this power plant is 17 years old? Better not tell Bill, he may try to rape it.
It’s way too old for his liking
It’s a typical summer here
in Utah, some 100’s.
Just think what it would be if there was climate change
Irf they can get it to work with a thorium-232 based reactor, it could mean way less radioactive waste and what waste is generated has a half-life of around 350 years, meaning really cheap disposal (if the nuclear medicine industry doesn't grab it first!).
He is using uranium not Thorium
I mostly want to hear why his wife won’t share any more about why they divorced and more about Epstein
What good would it do her to provide information to you?
@@comment8767 i think the public has a valid interest in everything tied to Epstein, given the circumstances of his death. The better question is why don’t you care
Isnt he still the guy that says he wants to limit population on TEDtalks?
Limiting population is a problem?
You do know that birth control, family planning, education, better health care, & poverty reduction are all contributing to "limiting population", right?
@@jacqdanieles actually, those are ways to “limit” population. “Reduce” means to take away from what is already there.
Not sure if I can trust him after what I've learned!!
Who do you trust.
So what have you learned by carefully studying the works of the great minds of our time, like Tucker Carlson? or maybe the esteemed Lou Dobbs? I suspect that you probably prefer RFK jr. Now there is a great American Patriot.
@@lockman004 The covid vaccines were a disaster.
on this episode of "ask a scumbag"
I saw the fruit loop at the beginning of the video and thought surely this is an SNL skit.
Woah, I didn't know Mo Rocca was still around! He's literally the funniest correspondent the Daily Show ever had. Kind of bummed he's just doing straight news now.
Now the vaccine expert is an expert on nuclear energy. Let’s hope this goes better
He predicted the pandemic 5 years before it happened. What have you predicted?
dont forget the mosquito experiment, this guy meddles to much
He wasn't a computer expert when he started Microsoft ... nor a business expert.
Easy to be an armchair expert in the CZcams comments ...
@@andybaldman And then they had a tabletop exercise three months before it happened.🤔
@@jacqdanielesum he kinda was lmao
When he was a teenager he literally helped program a hydropower plant
Hope it ALL works out...😊
He seems like a decent human being. While he does business with many countries, he probably likes to think of himself as an American. What was disturbing is how they take but never give. I am sure he took plenty of "advices" from other countries. I am Armenian and I only say that because I was born and raised in Armenia. The rest were the "Strangers". I always looked at the word multinational like someone who also knows how to multitask. Ever tried singing and speaking at the time?
I love the study of energy, being a semi-believer in SLI (street lamp interference).
People who owned/operated Three Mile Island: it’s perfectly safe and a clean source of cheap energy
People who owned/operated Chernobyl: it’s perfectly safe and a clean source of cheap energy
People who owned/operated Fukushima: It’s perfectly safe and a clean source of cheap energy
See a pattern there: it’s safe and clean and cheap, until someone does something stupid, or an unforeseen circumstance happens the engineers did not anticipate, then it’s gigantic disaster. Gates skipped over the part where the design uses 20% enriched U-235 fuel vs 2% in current designs, which cuts down the needed refueling, but makes bomb grade material that much easier to obtain. The recycling technology is not currently in the US, and it’s not as easy, requiring higher enriching standards, and added danger from criticality accidents, very common at poorly run enrichment plants. This is not the panacea it appears, it’s old technology, riskier in some cases there our current designs.
When lately have we heard about “entrepreneurs” trying to speed up processes, cut costs, and make things simpler in the news, and how did that go????
One other point, who’s going to insure it? A major hurdle no one is going to solve is who is on the hook if something goes wrong. Most of the companies in the US specifically exclude radiological accents from their policies (seriously read your homeowners policy). An insurance company runs from this type of risk, not because of the potential of the accident, but because of the catastrophic impact of just one accident. If no one insures it, it will never get built….
Zero people died after the accident at Three Mile Island. Fukushima experienced a magnitude 9 earthquake and 40-ft tsunami and there were zero deaths due to nuclear/radiation exposure. Chernobyl … was a disaster (no sugar coating it).
However, I’d point out that all 3 of those plants were built in or well before the 70’s. How many technologies do you know of that haven’t improved since the 70’s? The fact is, aside from one terrible accident, the safety record of nuclear power is exceptional, and the safety of the technology has only improved over time.
@@matthammond4485 I totally agree, direct deaths were deminimis, indirect deaths however were and are not. Increased cancer rates are well documented at Chernobyl, Fukushima is still under study, possibly not an issue, but not totally clear based on the current research. Around 10 miles from Three Mile Island the cancer rates increased statistically higher for lung and leukemia respectively. So it’s not just the immediate effects.
You also negated to mention the economic and social impacts. In all cases the implications to local residents and taxpayers/rate payers of the countries suffered and were on the hook for the clean-up. When you can’t live in large portions of an area, I’d call that a disaster. Chernobyl and Fukushima have exclusion zones that will be present for centuries, TMI supposedly did not require the evacuation zones, but try to sell a house close to that plant, your not getting anything close to fair market value.
These new plants are nothing new, sodium reactors have been around just as long as boiling water reactors. The design was tested in the late 50’s, the Sodium Reactor Experiment in Simi Valley melted down in 1959 and 1/3-1/4 of the fuel rods were damaged with radioactive gas vented to the atmosphere. It was covered up and downplayed mainly because we did not understand the health effects.
You also failed to consider the refinement and enrichment for the fuel. Most direct deaths aren’t from reactor accidents, they are from accidents in the supply chain that refines and produces the fuel, those accidents are numerous.
Lastly, reprocessing and mining is not considered in your argument. We are talking about large amounts of weapons grade material in the sodium reactors which pose a proliferation threat (one of the reasons pressurized water reactors are what we use today). To reprocess fuel it requires refinement and this makes more weapons grade products and waste materials. Mining has always been an issue, one that is often overlooked. Uranium mines are dirty, just as dirty as coal mines or other fossil fuels, and require large equipment that runs off fossil fuels, so your really not saving anything there either.
It’s not a panacea, and it’s not as cut and dry as Mr. Gates and the environmental groups would have you believe and while it’s relatively “safe” I am sure you would not want one to be built in your back yard, or a processing facility, or a waste disposal facility, so it’s not a viable solution either….
CHEAP ... it's NOT! Montana Dakota Utilities (MDU) just RAISED our ELECTRIC RATES again 😡
Nuclear is hands down the best option. Glad to see this. This is the backbone of industrialization.
Elon Musk came up with a new train and soon will build rails with his hands. Nuclear cars? Science Fiction. :::: Did you like Science Fiction?
Oh, look it's the vaccine expert. Seem he's into nuclear physics now.
At least he predicted pandemic
I hope they can use this technology t fix the ice cream machines at McDonald’s
respect
Anything for peaceful use is a great welcome.
why its look like mr. burns try to make springfield?)
We need a ton of nuclear. It’s so silly to think it’ll all be solar and wind. We need all three so we can get off oil, natural gas, and coal.
I'm confused Bill - you're PC manufacturer in one moment, then you're the Covid Vaccine Car and now you're into nuclear technology - which one is it Bill?
Anything he sees potential for profit and control.🤑🤑🤑 He’s playing world domination and money laundering dressed up as “philanthropy” and people still won’t see him for what he is: evil.
Mosquito Malaria King.
Yes, saving the lives of millions of non-caucasians does irritate many of the MAGA crowd.
@@lockman004 All part of his Malthusian plan.
@@fredgarvinMP do enlighten us on this "malthusian plan" & who it benefits.
@@jacqdanieles You've never heard Bill talking about reducing the world's population?
@@fredgarvinMP and how did he propose to do that? Enlighten us ...
How wonderful as this comes into play. After all, the earth is covered in water with varying levels of salinity. Also, our own bodies. A certain symbiosis.
I can’t tell you how many times I’ve gotten into heated debates with the people that call themselves “environmentalists” who are anti nuclear power. I’m like bro are you serious?
I worked in the industry for 40+ years and am pronuclear but that does not mean I have to support the massive cost of new nuclear. I live in the grid area of Vogtle, just built the newest nuclear plants in the U.S.. My electric rates increased 25% because of them and will increase more when the second unit comes on line. Vogtle is the world's most expensive (per Mw capacity) power plant. The fear of living next to one has nothing to do with fear of an accident. I fear it will continue to run and be unable to afford my electric bill
Sodium reactor design has been around since the 60's.
My understanding is that he went to Epstein Island to discuss clean energy. Yep.
☝️
And vaccines.
Dudes a freak
He had an employee living at his house with B@by R@p3... 6000 photos. (Gates. Google it. Only WA reported on it
If CBS could report on "Actual News" and not just stuff from the people who fund them, that would be great.
They do report on the news, you selected something that is clearly titled " Bill Gates on next-generation nuclear power technology". It seems like more of a localized reading issue.
@@callmethreeone
Correction: CBS reports only the news which benefits their handlers
Epsteins pal
The NuScale SMR project (the ONLY SMR project in the U.S.) was to come online starting in 2029 and was supposed to replace electricity from coal plants that are closing.
Instead, NuScale and the Utah utilities announced Wednesday (11/ 8/23) they're terminating the project after a decade of working on it. The cancellation comes amid supply chain problems, high interest rates and a failure to obtain the desired tax credits.
And Terrapower is next to cancel
Thumbs up for nuclear powet.. thumbs down for Bill Gates..
Interesting to see the beginning of a booming Uranium industry. It's here!
This isn’t a new design. It’s mostly a copy and past from oak ridges 1965 test reactor. Hopefully they’ve resolved the material issues from back then. The US Navy actually installed a sodium moderated core in the their second ever nuclear submarine, but it kept having containment issues due to leaks produced my the liquid sodium.
Bill who ? When did he get elected? What right does he have to make policy's.
Surprise, it is not the governments responsibility to build nuclear plants that is what private industry does even though Bill is getting $2 billion in matching funds to build his nuke. My guess is that he lost a lot in the divorce
He gets FLUSHED
Bill puts enough money into Terrapower to look good but not enough to finnish the job. Future government money should be tied to commitment to commercialization.
Why isn't Dr evil in prison,
Well Smith has indicted him but that is up to a Jury.
So important to fund clean projects where carbon workers are displaced.
Kemmerer Wy has 2,700 residents educated by one of the lowest performing school systems in Wy. that has some the lowest performing schools in the nation. Thank God it is the middle of no where when these Homers run that plant
Gee, please get the William off any broadcast channels, tell the man that there is such a thing as LFTR and Thorium instead of promoting old, dangerous tech in "new" and still dangerous forms.
Thorium has been trying to escape the lab for 60 years. Tried in many countries and abandoned in all
Is time-warping the key to all our problems? That's impossible without near light speed conditions, and its energy tradeoff? I'm not so sure.
Maybe we could time warp bill gates out of here.
This video is propaganda.
"It's what you don't say. It's what you don't do."
bro this guy made covid
CONGRATULATIONS AND BEST WISHES 🙏 FROM RAVINDER TALWAR JALANDHAR CITY PUNJAB INDIA
What in the tan suit is that guy wearing?!?
So given Mo Rocca always wears the same terrible outfit, I guess it must be a branding thing. Man, this guy needs a new personal branding agent...
Pure evil.
in the oil industry they drill 40,000 ft into the ground. why can't they put the waste 40,000 feet into the ground and cap it. Anything you put down there will not be seen again.
You may want to ask every nation on earth, including North Korea, Russia, and China why they don't do that and you will have your answer why countries actually concerned about the environment don't
@@clarkkent9080 how does it hurt the environment?
@@bluedot6933 My point is simple that has no country ever tried or even considered what you suggest? So much for the conspiracy theories in the U.S.
BTW, Oil and gas wells can range in depth from a few hundred feet to more than 20,000 feet. In some parts of the world, wells go as deep as 30,000 feet. Costing from 4 to 20 million each
FYI, A fuel assembly is 12 feet long and ~9 inch by 9 inch. They are externally contaminated so the must be placed in a shielded container and that could increase the dimension to more than 2 feet if you use a cheaper shielding material than lead. Oil wells are not 2 feet in diameter.
In addition to commercial spent fuel, there is military high level waste and 90 MILLION gallons of highly radioactive waste from the production of nuclear weapons and that is just in the U.S. All will have to eventually disposed of but there are no simple solutions
what about the aquifer, seismic movement ?If oil and gas got there from plants that once were on the surface can you assure it will never move?
@@clarkkent9080 I don't believe there is a aquifer 40,000 ft in the ground or one that would affect people on the surface. Anything put 40,000 into the ground will not be seen again ever. But I think it just has to be there for hundreds of years until its safe.
@@bluedot6933 The radioactivity decays slowly. Pu239 has a 24,100 year half life so after 169,000 years you still have 1 % remaining and that is 676 times al long as America has existed.
You don't understand what that means? How do you even warn people 169,000 years in the future to not dig here or drill for oil? what language or symbol do you use?
In todays world, shortly after burring the waste the conspiracy theories would start in social media on what was REALLY burred and the nut jobs would try to dig it up. It would require constant security but what happens when America no longer exists....no country has lasted for ever.
Burring waste is just the cheap way of letting future generations deal with it.
Americans are not stupid. We see the writing on the wall and know that coal and oil need to be replaced. As long as there are good paying jobs most people will work anywhere.
There are many good paying jobs teaching English grammar.
Qualified and educated Americans will not move to Kemmerer Wy. where only 2,500 hew haws are willing to live.
Holy cow I love how Bill is an expert for everything
Just release the fckn zero point energy technologies already🤬
He needs to stay in his underground dungeon Perfect place for these people to be
That applies to most rich and powerful people. And the only reason you are not in that group is because you are not rich or powerful
“As fossil fuels die out in America” meanwhile American demand for fossil fuels and global demand keeps growing.
Well he's talking about a long time that we will die out, meaning they will be a small part of total energy production. And at the rate it's going it won't take too long before demand for fossil fuels will decrease!
so he's just taking the thorium reactor that was around since the 60's to the next level
No, he isn't. He is talking about Traveling Wave Reactors (TWR). This uses depleted uranium, not thorium.
@@Zoyx It actually can use thorium btw and this is still in its early developmental stage
Run from everything this guy touches
Is that Mo Rocca!?
what's that on your head?
When are they going to get this sucker running? They've been talking about this for YEARS!
since 2016 to be exact.
4:22 20 years ago this line would have been an ultimate insult to Bill Gates 🤣