BACK TO BASIC - INTERPOLATION

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 5. 06. 2020
  • Interpolation can be a little bit confusing, because you have people saying YES use it, and you have people saying NO don’t use it. Today, I’m going to take you to a scanning session where we going to break down these rumors of either having it ON or OFF. The difference is so obliviously, which I don’t understand why these rumors are out there at all. Join me, and let’s go.
    Thanks for watching and following, hope you find this video interesting and valuable.
    #S_MAGNETIC_VLOG #MRI #SIEMENSHEALTHINEERS #RESOLUTION #MEDICAL_IMAGING #MRI_TECHNOLOGIST #MEDICINE #MRI_RADIOGRAPHER #MRIRADIOGRAPHER #RADIOLOGY

Komentáře • 55

  • @yongmsong
    @yongmsong Před 4 lety +11

    Didn’t know you can do the retrospective reconstruction for interpolation. Thanks always for awesome practical videos!

    • @melisahensley7962
      @melisahensley7962 Před rokem

      For real, the practice videos are extremely helpful. Interpolation was amazing!! The fine detail difference was crazy!!!!

  • @TiagoSantos-ls9ze
    @TiagoSantos-ls9ze Před 4 lety +5

    Amazing, I always looked to this tool and thought "what that thing do?", Thank u, very much

  • @DiAshTray
    @DiAshTray Před 4 měsíci +1

    Never used it before, and never knew the use of it, but now I'm going to keep my eye on it. Thanks man.

  • @JC-ru3mo
    @JC-ru3mo Před 4 lety +2

    Great video. Thank you. 😎

  • @bronevichok0507
    @bronevichok0507 Před 4 lety +2

    You blow my mind! Thanks! Yes, use it for making images sharper if I don"t have time for increasing matrix size

  • @badrlinux6786
    @badrlinux6786 Před 4 lety +2

    that’s what I call a fine
    job 👌 keep it up bro🐱‍🏍

  • @user-bz3fw5ly1b
    @user-bz3fw5ly1b Před 3 lety +2

    Amazing. Mind blowing.
    Keep it up.
    Mohamed from SUDAN.

  • @72DIMOS
    @72DIMOS Před 4 lety +4

    Always using it, especially when I don't use sguere matrix

  • @agniredfieldmusic
    @agniredfieldmusic Před 3 lety +2

    Amazing video!

  • @mihaimoldo
    @mihaimoldo Před 2 lety +1

    So there's no drawback to using it. Awesome!
    Thank you for the content Bac. Love every one of your videos.

  • @ping700
    @ping700 Před 4 lety +3

    Yes we do use interpolation when scanning

  • @bism_allah
    @bism_allah Před rokem

    بارك الله فيك ان شاء الله 🤍

  • @TheM55m
    @TheM55m Před 4 lety +1

    Nice video 👍 i am from Saudia Arabia

  • @diyarphysicist7141
    @diyarphysicist7141 Před 3 lety +2

    Thank you

  • @davidbrown7932
    @davidbrown7932 Před 2 lety +2

    Wow great job Bac your presentation is amazing fantastic 🙏

  • @gulnaragayeva170
    @gulnaragayeva170 Před 3 lety +2

    👍👍👍

  • @scottgloverjohnson
    @scottgloverjohnson Před 3 lety +3

    Pretty much always use interpolation in - plane; I believe GE turns out on automatically for any frequency /read matrix above 256. Never liked the look of through-plane/slice interpolation though, UNLESS the acquisition is going to do reformats. Seen a lot of protocols with slice interpolation on like a 6-7mm slice, just never looked good to my eye.

  • @SuperMusammil
    @SuperMusammil Před 4 lety +2

    Nice. First comment

  • @joedh1988
    @joedh1988 Před 4 lety +1

    Great video. Also didn't know about the retrospective recon, very handy. Bit off topic, but could you retrospectively recon a sequence from say non fat saturated sequnce to fat saturated using this method?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Před 4 lety +1

      No, this I don’t think it’s possible.

    • @iansze2652
      @iansze2652 Před 2 lety

      I think you can only recon the raw/scanned images only....if fat sat (or any other scan sequence modification) was not applied during the scan, you cannot reconstruct it

  • @babjigandi9548
    @babjigandi9548 Před 3 lety

    What does interpolation (2,2),(3,3) upto (6,6) means?If we increase this order do we get good image?and does it take more time if we do with (6,6).What range is enough actually?

  • @Grazieeee-f9q
    @Grazieeee-f9q Před 4 lety +2

    Second comment!

  • @user-un3yw6ek9p
    @user-un3yw6ek9p Před 11 měsíci +1

    OK! Thanks for your Videos! Why shouldn't I always use interpolation? What is the disadvantage? Or, for what kind of sequenzes it is not good?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Před 11 měsíci +1

      From my experience I use it wherever I can.

  • @no-de3lg
    @no-de3lg Před 3 lety +3

    Your video awesome thanks really but what it really means interpolation?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Před 3 lety +1

      Good question. Please check this link for further understanding: mri-q.com/zip.html

  • @babjigandi9548
    @babjigandi9548 Před 3 lety +1

    That’s fine if interpolation 1 means it’s turned off and 2 is on.Can you please tell it for 3,4,5,6 what does they do.will be waiting for your answer
    Thank you 🙏🏻

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Před 3 lety +1

      2 means it’s double. So having 256 it will be 512. 3,4,5 shouldn’t be play around with. Means you double it even more. And that just messing with everything.

  • @nileshraval8295
    @nileshraval8295 Před 3 lety +2

    Can you make video for chemical shifting artifact c spine region t1 fs sequnse, how to reduce .please can u explane sir

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Před 3 lety +3

      Thanks for comment. There is no chemical shift artefact on fatsat sequences because you already suppressed the fat. Please read more here: mriquestions.com/chemical-shift-artifact.html

  • @patrickivancruz1421
    @patrickivancruz1421 Před 2 lety

    Hi,
    How can I see the reconstructed images on the viewing mode after creating? I can’t open it :(

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Před 2 lety +1

      Should be in the browser like the rest of the other sequences.

    • @patrickivancruz1421
      @patrickivancruz1421 Před 2 lety

      Thanks for your help! :) another question? Is there any possibility to retrieve deleted images in siemens scanner?

  • @abrabr6720
    @abrabr6720 Před rokem +1

    I see you using “copy image position” what does it do . Thank you

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Před rokem +1

      It’s more like copying the image where you at. So you don’t have reposition etc. Doing this the new plan of yours will align at same position as the one you position. Please try it out and you will understand more of it. I use it all the time for planning. Being able to work faster and more efficient.

    • @abrabr6720
      @abrabr6720 Před rokem +1

      @@Nguyen_MRI will certainly do try it. Thank you so much for a quick response. Please keep going nothing is simple or difficult in MRI all important. Always looking forward to seeing your videos

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Před rokem +1

      @@abrabr6720 awesome. Yes it’s try and fail all the time. Nothing is more important to share the knowledge in the community. More videos will come. Stay tuned 👍

    • @abrabr6720
      @abrabr6720 Před rokem

      @@Nguyen_MRI looking forward

  • @SuperMusammil
    @SuperMusammil Před 4 lety +2

    Please dear k space

  • @user-gc1wz2rq8c
    @user-gc1wz2rq8c Před rokem

    What's trade- off use to be interpolation?

  • @balakrishnavaddepally4521

    Any disadvantages of using interpolation

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Před 2 lety +3

      From experience no. But I’m going to do further testing after great comments here which made me curious. Stay tune

  • @praveenreddy7810
    @praveenreddy7810 Před 4 měsíci

    Plz new protocol

  • @taivo6241
    @taivo6241 Před 3 lety

    can you share to me some books about parameter mri ( pdf) ¿

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Před 3 lety +2

      I don’t have any pdf of books. I recommend you to invest in this one for further understanding : www.amazon.co.uk/Handbook-MRI-Technique-Catherine-Westbrook/dp/1118661621/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?dchild=1&keywords=catherine+westbrook+mri&qid=1600528042&sr=8-3

    • @sudishkumarp1944
      @sudishkumarp1944 Před 3 lety +2

      How we minimize time in DWI sequence in spine plz make video

  • @shadowboxer6462
    @shadowboxer6462 Před rokem

    Then why have it off ever

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Před rokem

      Good question. One thing is to save space. Having it on the file is larger. BUT that shouldn’t be the main reason. To your answer: I don’t know why it is off from the siemens tree. But you can clearly see the impact off that by having it on.