MUST WATCH: Raja Krishnamoorthi Mercilessly Grills Johnson & Johnson Lawyer About Talc Settlement
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 09. 2023
- At Wednesday's House Oversight Committee hearing, Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) grilled Aviva Wein, Assistant General Counsel at Johnson & Johnson.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
I’m beginning to think that maybe these drug companies are actually evil.
There is a possibility, yes.
Nooooooo. See how long it takes you to make the connection behind what they do tell us.
Pharmakia = Pharmacy
Sorcery witchcraft
Coincidence right?...right?
You think any company isn't evil? When the goal is profits for power and NOT to survive and provide for your employees and customers, they are naturally evil by default.
Edit: sorry, tried to hit the post arrow and my finger hit a completely tone deaf emoji instead.
Yeah, I think that they all are. How many people can be trusted these days? There’s so much wrong with this world. We cannot keep going on like this and it end up well.
Completely absent was any mention of how much asbestos is in the talc. Everything is "contaminated" with something and below a certain threshold, everything is harmless. This is the same pervasive scientific illiteracy that leads to people signing petitions to ban dihydrogen monoxide.
What will you ask Pizer?
Talcum Powder and Tobacco, we didn't know until 1925.
My grandmother died in the 70's from ovarian cancer. She used J and J Talc powder in her underclothing every day of her adult life. I grieve that she had to leave us too soon and die a painful death, while J and J may have known how bad her daily hygiene practice was for her. And they earned millions from innocent women like her!
I think it's standard procedure for lawyers to never answer with a 'yes' or 'no'. But when a trial lawyers grill a witness on the stand they vehemently demand a yes or no. I'll have to categorize that as yet another 'Elitist Double Standard'.
An unanswered question IS the answer to the question. Nuance
Congress and senators do it as well. Ha ha ha
You gotta read between the lines, it’s politics more than actual law here
I just googled her name and was not surprised!
Nail em!!!!!!!!!
Bankruptcy? What a joke
I could not get ANY baby powder when I visited Hong Kong so it may not be sold in quite a few places more.
This is now true everywhere. But 'baby powder' now contains corn-starch, not talc.
Is that man a congressman by any chance? Does anyone know? The lady didn't really make that clear
😂😂😂
Shut them down
He was far from merciless
Lier lier
I am laquetis of borg 😮
If the Democrats are going after J and J, now I'm wondering if it's true.
There is support from both sides of the aisle.
@@sirbailes A pity, because they have conflated talc and asbestos. Though similar, they are not the same. Asbestos, when inhaled, causes cancer.
@@saltburner2 the argument against J&J isn’t that they used Talc. It’s that they used Talc, while knowing their supply was tainted with asbestos. Knowing that asbestos causes cancer, and that in turn, some of their customers would inevitably develop cancer from the side affects of use and inhaling talc. All because it would cost a few pennies more to swap out for corn starch, which is what they use now. They market themselves as a company you can trust your family with, while knowingly infecting your children with cancer. I truly hope an unprecedented action by congress and the courts takes place, where J&J is made an example of for all corporations wishing to do business in America.
Baby power particulates aerosol and enter the body through respiratory means, allowing absorption of the asbestos into the bloodstream.
@@sirbailes "Tainted with asbestos" is not useful information. Everything is dangerous in sufficient quantities and harmless in sufficiently small quantities, and everything is "contaminated" with a non-zero quantity of something.
@@JacobNeff-oq5km great reply, Doctor. Unfortunately for you, the science does not support your speculation.
Thank you Raja Krishnamoorthi! We need more brave ppl like yourself. Nail this 'detestable liar'!
Wonder why the democrats are out to oust Johnson and Johnson makes me wonder why
There is money in it, and it is virtue signalling.
Capitalisim at its best.
Why do you put baby powder up your .....
These ppl just like the vicodine brothers will never face justice