The Best Lens for the Fujifilm XF System - XF33mm f1.4 R LM WR
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 08. 2024
- Yes, it's the best lens for the XF system - hands down. Don't agree? Tell me what you think in the comments! Let's chat.
Buy the XF33mm f1.4 R LM WR: www.amazon.com/Fujinon-XF33mm...
GEAR USED/MENTIONED:
Fujifilm X-T3: amzn.to/32BVNfV
Fujinon XF56mmF1.2 R: amzn.to/3qvRPO5
Fujifilm XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS: amzn.to/3z67JTb
Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR: amzn.to/3EAjanr
GoPro HERO9 Black: amzn.to/32Ihawh
Sony Tough UHS-II 128GB SD Card: amzn.to/33S8mnW
Peak Design Everyday Backpack V2 20L: amzn.to/3z5evcb
--
MY CAMERA KIT: kit.co/dylandersen/fujifilm-kit
MY WEBSITE: dylandersen.com/
MY FLICKR: flickr.com/oxeneers
MY INSTAGRAM: / dylandersen
MY TWITTER: / dylandersen - Věda a technologie
It’s nice when someone else has the same experience that you do! The first time I used it my eyes 👀 were popping out of my head like a cartoon character 😃
Right? Yeah, I'm telling you guys... this lens has 3D characteristics. It's just that good. Even for landscapes, I've had a lot of success with this. Thanks for your thoughts John - you're right on the money!
Hey man. Thanks for the great review! Just got myself this setup and I’m absolutely in love with it. My previous camera was the x100F so this feels like a huge upgrade.
NICE!!! Welcome to the gang - and the X100F was so great on its own but yes the 33 is a whole other dimension!
I am fortunate to have the 35mm f2 & the 33mm f1.4. The 33mm is tack sharp at f1.4 & has beautiful colors & bokeh.The 35mm f2 is a fantastic EDC lens for casual shooting & has a beautiful rendering in it’s own right. 😊
That's awesome! YES, I used to have my 35mm f2 that I loved so much. Have taken most of my favorite images ever on it. It stayed glued on my X-Pro3 when I had it until I got the 33mm. I use the 50mm f2 a lot and it makes me miss the 35mm f2. Damn Fujifilm haha. Well said, Jeff!
Really nice review. I like the calmness of just a voice-over and some honest opinions and sample pictures. I think where the 33mm focal length shines for me is impromptu portraits and 'product' type of shots, where you isolate a subject but don't go overboard with compression (coffee cups, flowers, etc.). I have a 35mm f2 and used it many times for family photography, the focal length is very suited for that. I am thinking to upgrade to this 33m f1,4 for better colors and quality though.
Really appreciate the super nice words man - I try and differentiate myself from everyone out there even though it's tough. This site is very saturated but I still think there's room for some folks who cover Fujifilm to do it a bit differently. Thank you though!
And yes, I think the 23mm f1.4 is the lens for you (per my other comment). You'll be so happy! I know it. Can't wait to see what you produce with it! Is there anywhere that you share your photography at?
I don't mind carrying a heavy lens, so have been loving my 16-55 f2.8 for daytime street photos in London (I use a short wrist strap to take half the weight off of my fingers). But the 33mm f1.4 is coming in the post, to enable me to carry on into the dark winter evenings after work. Should be lovely :)
I already have the old (non WR) 56mm f1.2 but I don't think its autofocus is up to the job for busy night time activity, and it crops a bit too tight for my style (I like people quite big in a photo, but I still like the background to be a big part of the story).
This lens is absolutely phenomenal i adored the 35mm1.4 but it was a pain sometimes but this one is the ONE 😍😍😍
Well said!! It is THE ONE!!
Unusual to hear a shout out to Flickr from someone on CZcams. Lots of abandoned groups there, but nonetheless, groups can be a useful resource.
As a wedding/family photographer, It's absolutely key that I own this lens. It hasn't let me down ☺️
Totally! So true. I think this new generation of lenses are something very, very special. It's going to be really interesting to see how the new 5th generation sensors/cameras fare with these lenses. Fuji has something special going on....
I have the 23mm version of the new generation and love this for my weddings. I find that the slightly wider lens gives me more flexibility in tighter situations with the image quality being as good as the 33mm.
I have this and it lives on my X-H1, incredible lens
Truly an epic lens!
I shoot fashion with Canon primarily but I bought a used XT4 that will be here next week just for my own personal photography. 50mm is my favorite full frame focal length so I think I'm gonna pick this one up. Thanks for the review!
Nick, my pleasure man! Yeah, for personal work, again, Fuji is just the way to go. Tons of pros are using Fuji systems too, but you can't ignore the draw towards Fuji for personal work. I love the 50mm focal length too, and this lens just is incredibly special. A no-brainer purchase - you'll be happy! Glad you enjoyed it Nick!!
Hey Nick what do you think when you compare the xt4 with canon especially in autofocus part is it good for intermediate level photography to keep investing in fuji or for pro work switching to full frame is a must?
@@LorencCala The XT4 no I would never use it for anything other than just hobby photography. The autofocus is too hit or miss. In perfect lighting it works really nicely but any challenging situations it really struggles. The XT4 is a great hobbyist camera you can get really good results when you are just shooting for fun without any pressure and can slow down a bit. The new XH2S though AF is supposed to be much closer to Canon so that one might be viable for pro work.
@@NickDelDuca thank you very much for the detailed explanation!
They're just killing it lately with the new 18/23/33 1.4 triad... bodes well for the 56 1.2 mkii coming later.
Yes absolutely! Wish I used the 56 1.2 more often though... but I think I don't pick it up due to how spoiled I am by newer LM lenses for focusing. Makes me dread using the 56 experience-wise, but image quality wise, it's incredible.
I bought the new 23mm 1.4. It's so good I'm probably going to buy this one too. I have the 35mm f2 and I love that lens. The new 23 blows my mind. I'd love to have all 3 of the new 1.4s and complete the trio.
Yes! I have the X-H2 now and the new 18mm/23mm/33mm work really well on the sensor. It's nice to have the trio of "40mp-compatible" lenses. I am super happy!
I might even make a video on why I love the 23mm f1.4 so much (new version). I've been using it so. much! Where can I see some of your work Matt? I'd love to follow!
So I rented the 23mm and figured I should just get the 18mm instead then I can crop in. These 3 new primes are insane. I had to pick this one up too... and lawd haf murphy. Incredible. im set with the 18 and 33. now all i want is for them to put out a 56 mkii
That 56mm f1.2 II will be INSANE
good idea. That cropped "sports mode" comes in handy for that. In the past I might not have done such a thing very much (unless bird photography), but with 40MP and lenses that can resolve those pixels perfectly... doing some cropping to turn a 18mm into a 23mm is smart. Try doing it in-camera rather than post.... I'd prefer getting a feel for the adjusted 23mm through the viewfinder.. You also get that breathing space on the sides of the EFV to anticipate moving objects. Faster write speed probably too.
Your two lens choices are perfect imho and I'm thinking of doing the same one day. If your cash flow agrees you could in the future get the new pancake 27mm for that extra portability. I can vouch for that lens and it's as sharp as any of these new lenses from what I can tell. If you ever want to go telephoto but not too serious about it I also recommend the 70-300. It's not the fastest lens but it's tack sharp, very small and light and decently priced. I'm making some wild assumptions here about your needs but for me anyway that 4 lens combo is like the smallest collection that covers all bases really well without breaking the bank. 18mm for landscape and crop 23mm street. 33mm 1.4 for everything (night photography too along with the 18mm). Pancake for taking advantage of tiny Fuji things. And 70-300 zoom for wildlife, travel/hiking or whatever telephoto needs necessary (it's also a fantastic image stabilized "macro" lens especially with a quality macro filter attached - it's ridiculous actually that this doesn't get more mention). I'm not a huge zoom guy but because I don't do crazy amounts of telephoto except wildlife/travel the 70-300 covers a great range and is fairly compact.
My favourite!
Stunning image quality out of this lens. Frankly, I'd probably use a 35mm f4 for travel, just based on the size. However, this lens is an absolute gem.
Agreed. I think you mean the 35mm f2 for travel, but yes, I would bring that 9 times out of 10 for travel. With the X-T30 or a smaller X Series body, the f2 is worth the size. Good call.
Yes! Great video - great lens!
Thank you Jerred! Stoked to watch more stuff from you - love your take on things. I also am a teacher (college adjunct professor) and relate to you quite a bit! Keep it up.
I kept only 33mm and the 90mm for my Fuji system (still waiting for an updated 18mm F2 to complete my set). I will tend to say that the 90mm is the best lens. If you didn't try it yet, give it a go 😀
Man, 18mm f1.4, 33mm f1.4, and 90mm f2 is pretty much a perfect trilogy. I prefer the 56mm f1.2 for the look but the 90mm is always great. Awesome kit dude!!
Great video bro! I'm an XT-4 shooter and I'm debating between this lens or the newer 23mm as well. Decisions, decisions 😅
Thank you dude!! Get both! Hahah, if only money was unlimited :)
This is almost welded to my XH1, absolutely incredible lens. Some issues with it being too much resolving power for x-trans 3 sensors in strong sun (which a CPL filter prevents), but the speed, render and clarity are so good any issues are negligible in comparison.
Interesting! Thanks for sharing. Do you have any image samples where you're seeing this? I would love to see and understand what you're describing - thanks Steve!!
@@oxeneers Sure! Off to bed now but I'll add tomorrow. It's a recognised issue, according to Fuji UK, too and there are a few threads out there about it
@@stevew7779 I totally believe it - haven't heard of it though. Bummer! Looking forward to it man, thanks for your help :)
Hey could you expand on the issue? I'm considering buying one, didn't find anything from a quick google so I'm curious.
Love the review! Which film simulation did you used?
Hey Charles! I usually use Classic Negative as a base or Classic Chrome - I did a video on how I edit my X-Trans files if you're interested!
czcams.com/video/BholGUkBvck/video.html
How does it compare in terms of autofocus with the xpro 3 against the XF 35mm 1.4? I have kids as you, and yeah, sometimes the autofocus is salow and miss focus when they are moving. Do you think it worth the upgrade from the old 35 1.4 to this new 33 using the xpro3 body?
The 33er has now replaced my 35mm 1.4. Compared to the 35mm it is in the corners sharper, has a higher resolution, a faster autofocus and weather protection. So it is superior to the 35 in all, and there is only one disadvantage: it is almost twice as heavy.
Yes, that only disadvantage is definitely worth noting. However, I do believe that this thing is resolving detail that previous wasn't able to be resolved by any lens in the XF lineup prior to this. The 18mm is great but the 33mm, due to its field of view, seemingly pulls details that could not have been seen before. It's that impressive.
The 35mm f1.4 is so so good. I rarely if ever miss focus
The 35 f1.4 is definitely so so good. But the LM motor in the new one helps me keep up with AF on my 2 year old :)
I opted for the Viltrox 33mm 1.4 and it is excellent on my XT-5.
The Viltrox 1.4 lenses are so good - literally changed the game. If I started over, I would go all Viltrox for the money, but with some extra coin, you do get substantial upgrades with the Fujifilm native glass. But, Ed, you're right - the Viltrox is "excellent". Great call.
I'm watching this video because I'm thinking to purchase one but I'm so drawn into the photos, the colors looks bomb. :) Are you using any film simulation for the photos shown?
Hi Kim! Yes, I do edit my photos in a particular way - here's my process if you're interested in watching how I do it! And thank you so much for the kind words!!!
czcams.com/video/BholGUkBvck/video.html
@@oxeneers Your welcome. Thank you for sharing the link, will check it out.
Great review! Considering getting this, lens but I have another question that is XPRO related.
I am a headshot and portrait photographer, working in a small home studio with strobes and I also do a lot of headshot shoots with natural light. I have an XT3 and most recently, a X100V, and I’ve fallen seriously in love with the rangefinder style of the X100 series. So much so, that I’m considering selling the XT3 to get the XPRO3. I’d love your thoughts on that. I actually like the idea of the “hidden” LCD, and I love the connection with my subject when I look through a rangefinder style camera. It’s intimate and I can feel the camera get out of the way. It feels good to have an eye on my subject.
I have no problem with the XT3, it’s great and reminds me of the old Nikon FE that I trained on as a teen.
I just feel a deep connection to rangefinder style. I trained on film, shooting since I was 13, and something about the analog feel of the XPRO is calling to me, but unsure how it would be for professional headshots and portraits, and as a studio camera. Although I see no reason why it wouldn’t be.
Would you feel confident to have the XPRO as a main portrait and even a studio camera? Could it replace my XT3?
I also occasionally shoot family portraits and small events, occasionally a wedding. My work is all about people and the human connection to clients.
Thanks for any thoughts! I trust your expertise.
Yes! To all of the above. There are a few folks on here that use the X-Pro professionally as their "A" portrait cam and get great results. Obviously, for you, the shooting style will produce your best work so the answer is yes. For me, the X-T3 probably would produce the best work for me but my nose always hits the screen and constantly smudges it so the rangefinder style was always preferred for me. I've since left my X-Pro3 and moved to the GFX50S II and X-H2S, but I miss the incredible experience of the X-Pro3. There's nothing like it.
I would definitely do it because you just are "go go go" with the X-Pro versus a lot slower on the other bodies.
follow your heart man :D
Man, I want to have a fast lens for my X-T30 so so badly! This could be the one, but I‘m not sure if should get a 35 or 50 mm equivalent lens, I just can‘t really decide… I did use an old Minolta 50 mm f1.7 on my new old XD7 and it was so awesome, but sometimes I felt like having something wider would be nice. But then I also felt like this is perfect on many occasions…
It comes down to budget, really! They're all great! But the 33mm, if you have the money, is the best choice. If you are strapped for cash, the XC35mm f2 cannot be beat.
@@oxeneers If I‘d choose this focal length, it would be the 33 mm. I‘m totally okay with spending more on lenses, they define the quality and look of a photo and last an eternity. However, the 23 mm is quite pricey, it‘s another 100 to 150 € on top. But at the end, that‘s not the most important question. I do occasionally thing about the Zeiss Touit variants, but they were introduced in 2013 so I‘m a bit concerned about the autofocus, I prefer something snappy. Need to do some research on that… Thanks for your video and answer to my comment :)
For me xf56mm f1.2 the best one, but im wandering to take along xf100-400 or wide xf23mm
The 56mm is great, but the 33mm can achieve very similar results with a wider focal length. The 23mm would be a walkaround, take everywhere lens. Hope that helps! It's a good problem to have, trust me.
I just sold my x100v. After two years I just felt the focal length most mostly too wide. I want to try the lens. I’m so close to getting an xpro3, but I mostly shot the x100v using the back screen, rarely the viewfinder. So the back screen of the xpro3 just seems not ideal for me. I don’t like flip out screens, so xh2 is out. And not crazy I’m love with xt5. Maybe they will drop an xpro4 with a screen like the x100v. Or maybe I should get an xe4.
Totally feel you. The 23mm is special (see my recent video), but for pictures of people and portraits and the like, I always grab the 33mm or the 56mm, to be honest.
And yes, the X-Pro4 will likely make you feel right at home. I imagine - and this is a totally unsubstantiated rumor - that it will return to a tilt screen but it will offer something unique (maybe a tilt screen that you can reverse to 'hide' if you want?). Will be exciting to see. And of course, I will have a hard time not wanting to buy one lol.
The problem I have with this lens is that since I bought it I rarely can convince myself to use anything else! It's really great, maybe my fav lens ever on any system.
Haha - you had me in the first part. I agree. The only time I don't bring it now a days is if I'm going to like, a family dinner, indoors, and there's not much room to back up. But otherwise, it comes with me. It's that good.
@@oxeneers honestly I think 50mm equiv is just my thing. On my first camera, a M50, I fell in love with the EF-M 32mm f/1.4 and when I switched to Fuji the much loved 35mmF1.4 was a disappointment. The new 33 however feels like the Canon 32 did and I'm trapped again!
What do you think between the 33mm and the 56mm? Which one would you use much more ?
Honestly? I use the 33mm more, looking at my library and lens statistics, but the 56mm is a must have. Portraits on it are just too damn good!!!
What do you thin k about the new 23mm? Did you get a chance to use it?
Yes, I just recently got it. I am actually working on a video very soon!! Subscribe and you'll see it come out in the next couple of weeks.
What about 23mm 1.4?
I own the new 23 and the 33 i completely agree
Thank you man! Glad you enjoyed the video!!!
Hows the quality of 231.4 Compared to 33 1.4 ? Is it same or only the 33 has the "magic"?
@@nimai0108 I think they both have magic, but because of the compression the 35mm has you see it more
I have this lens. Optically it is excellent, but I find the focal length a little too narrow as a walk around lens.
Your comment actually inspired me to make a new video on the 23mm -- thank you Steve!
czcams.com/video/r3qpDS0bhrw/video.html&lc=Ugzee1B3gzhvqxj_js54AaABAg
@@oxeneers You’re welcome. I viewed your new video now. It is very informative. Thanks
You need the lens hood for shooting outside, right?
Not 100% necessary, but it does help cut down on some glare. There's a huge hood debate on the internet, but in my opinion, in certain angles, yes it's needed, but usually I don't shoot with it.
If only it would focus correctly with the Pro3… tried this 33 and the new 18 1.4 on 2 different Pro3 bodies and there is a ridiculous front focusing issue with both lenses
Could be that the OVF just does not work properly, as I had similar things happening on my ex-100V
Yeah, that's a bit frustrating. Try updating to the latest firmware??
@@oxeneers I found the error in the meantime. Its a general Fujifilm AF fault. Also talked to the official Fuji support. The cameras just cant focus consistently on a stationary object.
The wider the lens, the further away from the object and the stronger the light, the worse….
So ironically the cameras only focus quite reliably close up and in lower light situations.
Example which is also to be found in the internet: Keep focusing on the exact same stationary object and watch the AF distance scale jump around… its ridiculous how so few people notice and very sad, as I just today returned my 4th and last Fuji body:(
would be interseting to see side by side comparison pictures between the 35mm f1.4
Yeah, definitely. I sold the lens so don't have any ability to do a test, but there are some great videos on CZcams doing just that. I think Tung did a good one: czcams.com/video/3c7h18vIUU4/video.html
Looking for a 35 mm full frame equivalent prime with stabilization for video for a fuji x mount. Any recommendations?
I would do the 23mm f1.4 Mk II and just use an IBIS body like the X-T4 or the X-H2S. There's nothing at that equivalent that has OIS other than the 10-24 but that isn't nearly as sharp at 24mm.
@@oxeneers what a shame, I don't have an IBIS body. Thanks Dylan👍
@@MK-it7wk Ahh, gotcha. I think you can go with the 33mm f1.4 and do a cheaper gimbal for really stable video on a non-IBIS XF mount body!!
@@oxeneers thanks I'll look into it. Recently picked up a Fuji xe3 and love it! I'm interested to see how it handles video.
@@MK-it7wk Nice! I used the X-E3 quite a bit in 2020 and had a great experience with it - www.flickr.com/photos/oxeneers/albums/72157712992884212
For video, it's less capable but still will get some stuff done in a pinch. Results look great, too.
I don't even have a fuji camera and I want this lens.
I love that! Yeah, Fuji isn't the best depth-of-field, best AF, best any of that stuff, but the "feel" you get from the photos is hard to replicate on other systems. Full stop. Thanks for watching Johnny!
what about the new 23 1.4 ?
Hoping / praying I find it at ANY retailer or ANYWHERE soon!!
@@oxeneers leave it for those who need it, you have an x100V 🤣
@@tjkrueger2655 HAHAA so true. But man I would love to get rid of the 'ol 23mm f1.4 and upgrade. But you're right. Supplies are so limited man!!
how is the ovf with a square hood?
Depends on the lens, but for the 27mm f2.8 it's a non issue but for this 33mm, it definitely gets in the way even without a hood!
@@oxeneers Thank you. Is It unusable?
@@caterinadisalvo1477 I am not a huge fan of the OVF - full disclosure - but it certainly does not give you the same experience that having the full OVF on, say, a 23mm f2 does. So it's a tradeoff. But the 33mm is such an amazing lens that if you can learn to work with the OVF and the longer barrel in the shot, it is worth it if you're an OVF die hard.
@@oxeneers Does the lens impede into the actual frameline box (wondering for both and with and without)?
@@torb-no I don't have the lens anymore but if it did, it did it oh-so-subtly. It's one of the smaller (non-pancake) XF lenses.
Hopefully this lens is much better than the shown pictures that could be done with any other lens
Appreciate your feedback but will disagree. The resolving quality and "pop" of the lens is very unique and the photos shown I think demonstrate that. Sorry that we disagree here.
The 'R' obviously stands for "Ring" and not "Aperture".
Yes, but there are plenty of XF lenses with an "aperture ring" but that are not marked like the XF 10-24 (original). So, yeah. It's interesting.
@@oxeneers The original 10-24 actually has an R in the name.
@@martinlundkristiansen3859 My point exactly - just with an "R" designation does not guarantee (up until recently, I guess) that the lens has a marked, clicked aperture "ring".
I have the 35 should I get this one or the 22mm 😅?