20 Times Queen Elizabeth II Showed Her Ruthless Side
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 05. 2024
- 20 Times Queen Elizabeth II Showed Her Ruthless Side 👑
Queen Elizabeth II, celebrated for her duty, steadfastness, and global respect, also made decisive, firm, or "ruthless" actions to protect the monarchy. Let's explore these moments with nuance, recognizing the balance between personal decisions and institutional demands.
Key Highlights:
Supporting the Royal Marriages Act: Advised against Princess Margaret's marriage to Peter Townsend, prioritizing monarchy traditions.
Annus Horribilis Speech: Candidly addressed the crises of 1992, including royal separations and scandals.
Diana's Panorama Interview: Advised King Charles and Princess Diana to divorce to protect the monarchy’s stability.
Megxit: Allowed Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to step back while maintaining the monarchy's core functions.
Prince Andrew's Scandals: Stripped him of titles to protect the monarchy's reputation.
Throughout her 70-year reign, Queen Elizabeth II prioritized the monarchy’s stability and continuity, making tough decisions when necessary. From handling scandals to embracing modernity, her actions were guided by a commitment to preserving the Crown's integrity.
👉 What do you think was the Queen's most ruthless decision? Leave your thoughts in the comments! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more insights on the British Royal Family. Thanks for watching, and until next time, bye! 👋
#QueenElizabethII #RoyalFamily #BritishMonarchy #RoyalScandals
🙏Subscribe for more videos ➜➜ tinyurl.com/SimplifiedExplana...
🟢 Must Watch Videos:
▪ Royal Family Secrets Only Insiders Know: 15 Intriguing Revelations ➜ • Royal Family Secrets O...
▪ 15 Times British Royals Were Caught Acting Irresponsibly ➜ • 15 Times British Royal...
▪ 15 Times the British Royals Got Caught Lying ➜ • 15 Times the British R...
-----
Voiceover By: Catherine Divaris
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, Music, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Reference: bit.ly/3l8GUbc
Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976:
1)This video has no negative impact.
2)This video is also for entertainment purposes.
3)It is transformative in nature.
🟢 Must Watch Videos:
▪ Royal Family Secrets Only Insiders Know: 15 Intriguing Revelations ➜ czcams.com/video/LbOnJzV4ATE/video.html
▪ 15 Times British Royals Were Caught Acting Irresponsibly ➜ czcams.com/video/J06c-qJ2MRI/video.html
▪ 15 Times the British Royals Got Caught Lying ➜ czcams.com/video/ag6_MoXGMgo/video.html
I take it that when prince harry was born that was when charles officially gave up trying to make his marriage work with diana. I doubt that charles and camilla ever had a long break between them as he seemed to have suggested. Camilla was ever-present in their marriage
he didn't have to keep trying...he had his heir and spare, so that was all he require
The whole thing surrounding Diana and Charles divorce is hypocrisy and Charles should have been forced out of the line of succession for cheating on Diana . I hope his and Camilla's actions come back to bite them in the back side and he is forced to abdicate.
Nobody is perfect,the Queen was no exception.
If her two eldest son's stayed at home or in there own bedrooms. her two daughter in laws wouldn't have done what they did.!!
I agree
Daughters-in-law is the proper way to say it, Hazel. Thanks for your comment. Good grammar is very important. And, yes, those two elder lads shouldn't have been dipping the wick anywhere but their own marriage beds. Charles should never had married Diana; she had power and appeal far beyond his own. Fergie, on the other hand, is simply from another planet, and belonged nowhere near the monarchy! Cheers!
She was a real woman. She wasnt ruthless, she was REAL❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
She did an awesome job with everything she did! The decisions that people claim are so "cold and insensitive " were actually the right decisions. It sounds to me like what people wanted was a monarch who would condone and affirm their blatant sin, and queen Elizabeth II refused to do to. And she was right for it. May God bless her eternally in heaven.
Prince Chrales admitting he cheated on diana: - Did you try being faithful? Yes, until things became irretrievably broken down.
Also Prince Charles on the day Prince Harry was born just after princess diana had given labour: - Well now I have a spare, gotta go I have a plans with my mistress
He did not say any such thing. Dont make things up. And Diana had given birth, not given labour.
The late Monarch of blessed memory learned her lessons well from her grandmother and made certain that the Monarchy ALWAYS won and that Duty was paramount in all decisions she made.
And as Her Late Majesty Queen Mary taught her, the CROWN ALWAYS came first.
I don’t think QEll was ruthless. Think about the difficult position she was in. She loved her family so much and was so loyal to them. At the same time she had to uphold the monarchy and it’s rules and traditions. She did this for decades very, very well. At times she was in a no win situation. I don’t envy that. I will always miss her.
I know you hit the nail on the head. I still can't believe she's gone . my daughter called me to tell about the Queen my daughter said mom are you sitting down.
She should of up held the law. Where her sons were concerned. They were spoilt brats. They still are.
At some point with Charles there had to be memories of how much Edward VIII destroyed her family. Perhaps is the Queen Mum died before 2000, Charles would have been allowed to marry Camilla sooner.
She had empathy. She was taught not to rely on just her emotions. She did not want to cause anyone worry. Nor did she want to worry.
She was protecting her job. Nothing else. That’s what they do because people are realizing the monarchy is not necessary.
1995? No. Margaret wanted to marry Townsend in the 1950s.
The Queen mum was responsible. An old generation trying to rule.
The Queen was instrumental in having Princess Margaret issue the "Christian marriage is indissoluble" speech when she left Townsend. The playboy photographer commoner was also divorced yet she married him, so the matter re Townsend was moot in retrospect. Only the timing and societal mores allowed the second marriage, and it too ended in divorce. Poor, beautiful Margaret. A caged bird. She was a handful, but, man, she was sexy and charming -- and quite a handful for every man she was ever interested in.
@@AlmostMonumental27 nonsense Antony Snowdon was not divorced.
The late queen was a unique personality, very loving and respectful. RIP your Majesty. ❤
I think her sister Princess Margaret. Queen Elizabeth II should have allowed her sister to marry Peter Townsend. Princess Margaret may have been a much happier person, instead of the deeply unhappy, and bitter person she became.
The govt said no,the govt rules,the govt pays the RF a % from the Sovereign grant,the PM meets with the Monarch every week,the Govt rules,the monarch Reigns,they have very little power, everything they do has to be passed over by Parliament. The govt said no to Margaret's marriage so the Queen had to go with it..
The Queen did not prevent that marriage, the constitutional monarchists, run by the government, made the decision. The Queen denied the marriage because the government made her do it. The Q did what she was told--brilliantly!
It was actually parliament that stopped the marriage!
The government should have said no to Charles and Camilla's marriage also.
She was hard nosed with Fergie but never reigned in her sister and her antics.
That’s not true. Margaret didn’t marry her true love. And Fergie did some bloody awful things.
She broke her sister’s heart and margarita became a drunk.
@@bonnieusa6597 she did not break her sisters heart, she tried to work out a compromise for Margo. dont make tings up.
Trust me she didn't like some of those marriages! She knew better than to oppose them...😅
Ruthless no! Diplomatic yes!
Ruthless yes. Diplomatic mostly yes.
@@jmac3482 if Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, was truly ruthless, she would never of let Harry & Methane, take their children out of the UK, bringing their legal guardian.
@@pattisonpattison3639 What children????
@@jmac3482 Harry, and Methane’s. The Monarch is their legal guardian, and Queen Elizabeth II, could have prevented them from leaving Britain.
@@pattisonpattison3639 Only of children born of Royal bodies. These children are not born of Meghan, she has had a hysterectomy.
She knew her sons as does any mother, but she had a heck of a job to do - she did it well and was not stupid by any means We all throughout the world loved her for it. 😢 RIP 🌹
She was a very wise woman but like us all made a few mistakes
My Mom was born the same yr got married the same yr, stayed married for 70 yrs, during the times of depression and the war, was one of sacrifice, not narcissistic behavior....
My mom too was a contemporary of Queen Elizabeth's, and was proud to have Her Majesty lead her generation. She loved the Queen her entire life, and we are American.
@@AlmostMonumental27 My family all raised in Philly, very strict Catholics, and I know the Queen saw right through the opportunist of Meghan. Harry, has a mental illness, reason for being coddled his entire life....
I wish you’d do your homework. Peter Townsend died in 1995. The marriage talk with Margaret was in 1955!
Thanks for demonstrating the importance of fact checking. Peter Townsend DIED in 1995. He proposed in 1953. Margaret didn't even see him in 1995. Besides that, by 1995 there were multiple separations and divorces within the queen's immediate family.
Even I know this, and I'm a colonist.😊
She did a brilliant job and you cannot argue with that.
In a constitutional monarchy run by the government, she did what she was told brilliantly--who wants to be praised for that in the end?
Don't get me wrong i have alot of respect for QE...but if she spent enough time on her children as she did her horses they might have been more stability ! . RIP DIANA ⚘
I'm sorry, what is so wrong with her children? Charles had to marry someone he did not love because of pressure from the "Firm" and it ended with disaster. I have a lot of sympathy for for Charles...he did not do anything so terrible and is now happily married to the love of his life. Ann is an amazing woman...enough said. Edward has been completely unscathed from controversy and is happily married with a beautiful family. The only one of her children who is deserving of significant criticism is Andrew.
So easy to criticize
Exactly.
@@RBB52 I agree Andrew was the.most scandalous royal. He brought a lot of disgrace to his family. I Charles was no angel either. Yes he was forced into marriage with Daina which wrong because she only had to bear an heir . He should have stood firm and not go into the marriage. He messed up Diana's life.She was young and impressionable and was sweep on her feet. But Charles had other plans in mind. Then Diana was blamed for the collapse of the marriage. He is more loyal to his wife which he was having an affair with then showing affection to his own blood, his SONS. He must growing a backbone. It's like this woman is more his mother because he did not get must affection from his parents.
@@shahnaazbadat5303 empty analysis 🧐 based on nothing
The queen did her job every well everyone love the queen and huband to well done she was blessed of a long years of service and experience
It’s time to move on.
IF the press had not dug up all this mess, who knows what would have happened.
I love the Queen❤ and prince phillip
There will never be another Queen like her. She was loved for all the dedications she made. When it comes to the death Diana, Princess of Wales, for a time I was upset but with age comes wisdom & I, now at the age of 52, understand the family were looking after the boys. It's one of the only times she choose to put family first as we were talking about the future King, Prince William. The boys were so young (I was 6 when my father died). So she & the Royal family cared for them until the family felt it was time to come back to London.
My only wish was that she had taken Harry out of the Royal line. King Charles can't as it is his son but Prince William will & none of us will be shocked. Harry & Megain's Oprah interview, poor Prince Phillip was in hospital when that went to air. That broke the Queens heart. It's common that if one partner dies when they are elderly, within two years, the other will also die & that just what happened. I have seen it so many times, both on a personal level & as a nurse. The Queen would still be here if it wasn't for those two greedy people.
Greedy people? They chose to earn their own money and not be leeches. The royals are the greedy ones by accepting millions they don't deserve.
Everybody makes mistakes, who dont' She was a human being? She did a great job her whole life, off course with some mistakes, that's normal. Let her rest in peace.
A great lady.
She had some difficult decisions to make
I loved diana and the rest just left a bad taste in my life. I wouldn't give you 2 cents for any of them but William and his grandpa
Not them either
I admire what Queen Elizabeth did while she was quite young. I understand that she addressed Great Britain during the second World War. I understand that she was quite bold and exhibited strength toward her people. She tried to be encouraging
I always loved and respected Queen Elizabeth the 2nd and I too am a colonist
In this age, how can anyone bow to or curtesy to someone else? Forget tradition, it is a practice designed to suggest subservience. I loved England, but could never have become a good Brit. I am glad my ancestors immigrated.😂😊❤😌🤭
Only one to bow in front of is God.
@@cannkotlarz621 And why would God even require a bow?
Charles SURE DIDNT inherit that trait or harry would be dust long ago !!
Queen Elizabeth had every chance to deal with Harry and Megan and she did very little to reign them in. If she had taken appropriate
action to begin with maybe they wouldn't be the pain they are now. 15:59
I thought she was quite cold after Diana's death. She only came out and said anything when she realized everyone loved Diana and it looked bad for her.
Had the media and the country not demanded flag at half staff or wondered where she was and not speaking out she would of never returned home. Her comments about Diana no longer being part of the royal family, although true, I found disrespectful to her sons and her memory. The speech she gave was so fake.
It was her ex daughter in law . Who brought a lot of shame . She was more concerned for her grandsons . Like any normal grandmother
According to her upbringing I think she did do her best as a parent. Young children are all adorable but when puberty clicks in Oh, How they can change, I think they were a loving and very close knit family when it was just them all together. They all had a lot to put up with……it is so restful being ordinary.
Diana was giving Interviews and having multiple affairs. People mourned her looks, they didn't know the real Diana. Try reading Lady C's books on Diana and you will see Harry there.
@@Nino-vt9bt no she wasnt..her son charles brought her great embarassment the tampon.what did she do with her own kids she was cold she admitted it herself..she was jealous of her sister and Lady Diana which was a breathe of fresh air compared to the stuffiness upper so called lip class...she regretted that she waited so long after Lady Diana passed..it wasnt about her granchildren..it was how did it look .why cant some people accept truth..we all have our not finest moments how ev er the firm had alot of secrets that cost people their lives...if you want to learn about the history...it comes with the truth....she wasnt a single mother that had to have several jobs to support her kids nor was she homeless .or poor....why would one bow to those that pretend a
I do not believe Her Late and Most Gracious Majesty was ruthless. More so, she was more like Queen Victoria who had her share of difficult choices to make. She also handled situations in the way she did because as a female in a man's world, it was important for her to show her people that she COULD (and DID) do her job with tact, decisiveness and purpose. Rest In Peace Your Majesty.
Not ruthless but sensible and proper as had been her due.
I can only say, as an Australian observer that the Monarch of the day must uphold all the traditions of the Church ( OF WHICH THEY ARE HEAD OF STATE), & PUT COUNTRY & TRADITION AHEAD OF PERSONAL ISSUES & before the Royal Family members..
This stupid interviewer does not understand the riguers of the Monarchy, and labels the late Majesty Queen Elizabeth 11 as "ruthless.". You forget that this is her prime function and , if challenged on any issue within this area must put the Monarchy FIRST.
Please , respect the English institution of Monarchy and remember that America has only a President for 4 years , and there is no continual tradition to monitor their Presidential Government such as the Governor General in Australia. , That is how the abuse of Presidential power & scandal is avoided/censored. ! Understand our traditions before commenting !
So you meant to say, there's no abuse of power when someone is Royalty? Really? With all their lies, bad deals and abuse behind closed doors. Don't forget they are still humans and when you are dealing with humans we are sinners not even one of us are 100% sinless okay, therefore Elizabeth wasn't a saint.
Let's face it, most Americans simply do not understand the value of the monarchy to our realm nations with their parliamentary governments. The Monarch provides a level of continuity and security from any less than reputable politicians. As well the parliamentary system does not give the Monarch enough power to corrupt the government. It has worked very well for centuries. I feel very comfortable that our politicians have to go to our governor general (Canada) for permission to open and close parliament. Our prime minister has enough power to get things done and yet is not even head of state and can be removed quickly for cause by the Monarch. On a side note, the possibilities for the next election is the United States because of the structure of their system of government, is terrifying.
To bad Charles doesn’t have her wisdom or backbone. Charles needs to deal with Harry and Megan but he will leave the mess for William to deal with.
AMEN !!!!CHARLES IS TOO DAMN WEAK TO BE KING !!!
Same way she left it to Charles to deal with it.
@@user-ve7ni2by7phe does very well
Barbara ,Prince Harry and his beautiful wife Meghan are grown up & have a great life ,just leave them alone .They don't want to live in a cage like the other Royals.
@@gardy4390utter tosh sugar 😊
Yet she did nothing about Charles and Andrew....She knew how her son's were....Ok for them to do whatever but not Fergie or Diana or others...She was no Saint neither were her sons...🤔🥴
And Phillip ! He was always at parties leaving the Queen at home,rumours were always flying about him in his younger days and women..
Agreed she was so transparent. I should not speak about the dead. But always turned a blind eye to son's wrongdoings but always hard on her daughter in laws. She and her husband had cold faces. I guess it flows in Charles blood.
Not being disrespectful to the dead, it was rumored that Andrew belonged to Porchey. If you look he does not look like his siblings. Andrew is built boxy like Porchey.
🤣🤣🤣🤣. Who is Porchey?
@@shahnaazbadat5303i think he was the queens horse trainer
She served her country beautifully
For years she was known for no sympathy for anyone.
Like all of us she had her faults, it's one of the things that makes us human but she was loved and respected by millions of people for over 70 years. She was a great monarch and is much missed. 🇬🇧
She & princess help poor Diana . An when they found that out . They were ashamed that they didnt help her . Or be nice to her the Queen. Found that out she wasnt nice to Diana . 😢😢😢
Diana did not need help. She had been in the system since birth.
@@kathysharpe7339 hardly.
Rubbish, the queen treated Diana well enough, and she was not ashamed that she did not help her at times
Ruthless is not an appropriate adjective: it's used to attract viewers.
Yeah, ruthless is too dramatic and inhumane....QEII was not ruthless...❤️
"... preserving and protecting the reputation of the monarchy." 😁😂🤣🤪
interesting.........................................................
I just curious if Queen Elizabeth II does support the deaf or hard of hearing community in the United Kingdom or not? Alike late Princess Diana does support the deaf community?
@chrisdeaf98418
Big difference in responsibilities the Queen had to adhere to and Diana's .
It's not the deaf that need help in this drama, it's the people that cannot see!
Back in the time she was born people were rough and tough times were hard
Prince Philip had many lovers. His uncle Lord Mountbatten had was notoriously gay but allowed also loved his wife and encouragement her to also take both male and female lovers. Queen Elizabeth's mother and grandmother were against her marriage for all of the above
Yet she married Prince Philip anyway
Producing an heir and a spare is the number one importance in the aristocracy's part of the bargain to keep 90% of the land in the 10% ownership and control of the Upper Classes! After the birth of the spare, marriage partners do as they please. That is the deal.
H can’t call himself the spare anymore...William’s 3 kids kicked him out of that. He only does it in his usual self-pity.
Her sister wanted Peter Townsend
😢😢😢
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, was diplomatic, not ruthless.
Well yes....she deal with worst in her life time... Respect 🖖
Preserving what integrity? Charles demonstrated that he had none. She could have let him know she would skip over him for king unless he zipped it up and stayed home like a good prince.
The Dear Late Queen Elizabeth II wasn't ruthless, per se, in my opinion. She was strong, and able to detach herself and her personal/familial decisions from her role as Sovereign. As for this video, it could have been halved in length and done the same work. What a bore listening to all the unnecessary babble. When scriptwriting, do your best next time to consider the audience, please.
Princess Margaret wanted to marry Peter Townsend in the mid 1950’s not 1995…clearly in the 21st century that changed…and given her grandson’s marriage to the American divorcee perhaps she should have adhered to the old rule.
It wouldn’t have been too hard....h was already 6th in line....
Her Majesty had two roles to balance between , one was as a ruler of Great Britain and the other was to her family members and their private lives . She couldn't interfere with her children's marriages as they needed to sort it out themselves between the couples . Her Majesty also needed to make sure that traditions and the rules were followed by her family concerning official events . It's one of the hardest jobs in the world as you are responsible for more than yourself but the welfare of the population of the country you are reigning ..
One cannot serve two masters. Well! She proved that!
The monarch is not constitutionally bound to not enter politics it was her wish to do so, and she thought that King George III being involved in politics lost the crown of the American colonies. And the second is that the UK does not have a constitution
Tears for a floating palace and a 1000 room castle burning but not the death of Diana
So selfish and spoilt. Of course she sealed cookies will. We’d have known how rich the old cow was
Gonna need a translation on that one??
She’s not giving ruthless. It’s giving she did her job the best way she could to save the monarchy. I agree with almost everything she did.
I don’t understand why the people of England want a monarchy that they have to pay their taxes for them to live in wealth and luxury while some of them live in poverty.
You may wish to look up the details. The monarchy brings in considerably more in tourism than taxes paid by the public
@@chrystya But the M ruins all the lives contained within including the Queen. Is it worth it?
We don't ask other vastly wealthy people to give up their cash, or the obscenely vast amounts of lottery cash to be shared out when it could be used for good. The government creates poverty by letting illegal foreign nationals overrun our country and paying for their every need. .
@@jmac3482 how does it ruin lives?
@@glen7318 The monarchy system within the patriarchy system (on steroids) ruins lives of the people caught in the BIG systems!
"... the monarchy's dignified image." 🤣🤣🤣
Yes I think that to her Diana was a nuisance and when she was forced to make a speech after Diana’s death she looked like she was speaking through gritted teeth. Very cold.
Prince Wiliam
considering the Queen's experience with her uncle & sister demands & actions you would think she must have seen similarities in Meghan & harry!!!! as an american myself we have no clue what royal lives entail!!! the rules,traditions,protocols & consideration of the public they serve with their expenses Wallis Simpson thought she would be able to live in the lap of luxury & as did meagain!!!!! harry on the other hand knew full well what was expected of him he knew the rules & protocols & still showed nothing but disrespect to his late grandparents who never did him wrong!!!!! & the greedy spare slug was expecting her to leave him millions!!!!! he got what he deserved the wife he wanted & no contact with the family he states did him wrong!!!! the Queen told him either you are in or out & he chose out because meagain couldn't & wouldn't follow the rules & protocol!!!! meanwhile Princess Margaret was told if she wanted to marry a divorcee she wouldn't have the luxuries she was used to so she chose not to marry!!!!! harry chose the opposite & now he has to live with his choice!!!!!! & using his mother's tragic death as a crutch is the same evil like meagain using abuse & racism as hers!!!!!!! on the other hand in the case of Princess Catherine she had the luxury of being eased into the royal life over a number of years!! & was very aware unlike meagain just saw jewels & money!!!! & of course being British she knew full well about the royal family !!!!
Em, ok
And when people of color were not allowed to hold office jobs. Then once she had to comply with the law, she mandated that she couldn’t be sued for discrimination.
Spot on
You have hit the nail on the head. I must add that l think Charles should never have been crowned king as he was an adulterer with Camilla, a married woman. After all ,as king, he becomes head of the church. He got divorced, and Camilla got divorced. Then, they had a civil marriage. So under the laws of the Christian Church, he should never have had the crowning of King to this country.
@@charlottegibson1274 the Church of England came about because the Catholic Church wouldn’t allow Henry VIII to divorce Catherine of Aragon to marry Anne Boleyn. Henry also used his position as head of CoE to get rid of anyone who spoke against him and do whatever he wanted. Charles and William are perfect to run the church.
The definition RUTHLESS is to show no pity : being merciless, or cruel. I saw none of this in the 20 examples you showed, only the queer doing what was expected of her
Doing what she was told--brilliantly!
Traduci in Italiano 2:01
The family are now cursed. She excepted Camilla as Queen but. Not her sister Margreat she could Marry and her. Son Charles should not of let him be king. Plus Philip he was no saint
Neither does her son Charles or Andrew. I bet their sister is same way.
I would have low empathy if I had to deal with the drama with what she had to deal.
The only thing she should have done after Diana was to publically say:
My grandchildren a grieving. As a courteousy to them, let them grieve in private. As (Princess) Diana is no longer an official of the Royal Family, the Standard will not be flown in. The Union Jack will be flown in en lieu. The House of Windsor is in contact with the Spencer in planning Diana's memorial service, An announcement with its regard will be made in due time. Please allow Princes William and Harry to grieve without any further distractions.
In private, call Blair and tell him to bugger off.
Really went off topic.
Going off topic for the purpose of education the vacationeers on the Good Ship Lolipop!
@@jmac3482 huh?
@@elizabethcurrie4920 Pay attention and you'll catch up.
@@jmac3482 no thanks
Denying her sisters marriage to the divorcee
She actually said she could marry or have the royalty and Princess Margaret chose royalty so shows how much she really loved him 🙄
She could have helped Diana but she did not put children last. Dianna put h children last. She could have helped Charles and Diana but she did not
what are you on about? YOU're making no sense
Everyone Knowl
I don't believe the old queen would be living about kate
So why did she let Harry marry Markel she would have been given all the low down from MI5and MI6 on Markel and her family and her life So what are the RF hiding?
It didn't matter. Harry was going to be Harry, no matter what anybody told him. He would have done whatever Meghan wanted. The Queen had no choice. The vows do say...foresaking all others. Harry isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer. So there you have it.
She let Harry get married and let Charles divorce HRH Diana. Two stupid ideas
Why was Harry getting married wrong. He and Meghan have walked away from toxic situation. Harry is the best of them.
She didn’t conker all, unfortunately, I don’t think we’d still be having to put up with, Meghan. I think the Queen was a beautiful and very strong woman.❤️🇦🇺❤️🇺🇸🇬🇧
Prince Charles, was Greatly influenced by 2 Philosophers Carl Yung and Sir Lourens Van der Post..
Apparently Diana didn’t like Sir Lourens, he was made god father to Prince William by Charles!
They told him it was Normal and Acceptable to have a wife and a Mistress!
His uncle Lord Mountbatten also had enormous influence over him as a Younger Man, with similar influences as these two Philosophers!
Prince Charles has a NEW Age, religious Belief and has a minimal Christian Faith., due to these Philosophers influences over him!
Yet he’s the Head of The Church of England!
Apparently The Queen was Concerned about this..
We all know, that Diana was very Troubled, and refused Psychological help..
Charles did keep UP an ongoing Friendship with Camilla..
This would hinder any marriage!
Carl Jung was a genius. What happened to Charles?
Prince Philip wasn’t a saint either…I know someone who brags his mother was one of his mistresses. Those Brit’s, they think that’s something to be proud of. Go figure.
He was an atheist.
Вильям таких дитей Майкал джексон спас чтоб их не продали и не убилиб
You’re absolutely clueless. Our late Queen was wonderful and did many, many things to help others.
@dee2251 the Queen sacrificed a great deal for a England. During the 2nd world war she and her sister worked hard with the wounded etc etc she was driving around in a jeep working. A great woman
@@cafemarlene8 Wake up and smell the coffee or you get left behind!
@@cafemarlene8 she did not work with the wounded, she worked for the ATS and learned how to repair a jeep
The teenage princess doing a bit for the war effort, was not hard work. And Margaret was too young. They spoke occasionally on radio as encouragement.
The AI kept using pictures of US money while talking about the monarch of the UK. 😂 Kinda destroys the credibility of the video.
When it came to weddings, instead of taking public funds, she took rations from them as gifts instead during WWII to make her wedding dress, while my grandma had to wear a blue one, just covering her knees and sleeveless dress and gave the queen some of her rations
I understood she returned all the clothing ration coupons to those people who offered them so she could have a beautiful dress.
stop making up things.
Tbh i only ever got into royal family when diana came along they wouldnt be were they are today in celeb wise diana would of made amazing queen but they tried section her what a horrible life really i wouldnt want it
It took the Queen 17 years to advise the dissolve of that marriage that fell apart after the birth of the spare in year 4. Ruthless for sure.
Why did she allow Harry to marry Megme?
I always perceived her as a very cold , would even say selfish person - agree
she presented herself as indifferent , ruthless person - She was caring only about her Palaces , money , diamonds. and monarchy - and most of all being constantly supported by English people - free or minimal taxes - / With her staggering wealth of palaces , arts , jewelry lands - seems extreme greed - 😬 -
she pays taxes.
This video has highlighted what most of us have tried to ignore. The Queen was an evil woman who destroyed her relatives while protecting her sons 😢 can’t watch anymore
Sense of duty seems to be was her only quality. I'm glad everyone liked her. I just never had a good impression of her and God she just dressed terrible I never got that
you dont seem to know much about royal life. A sense of duty is the most important thing and she had that in spades
Not excepting Diana as a Lady Royal when she was going with . Charles Diana was Royal .
Not the staff look after yourself and family do you want to get control of like a real Megan for instance
She should have backed Diana...Charles was out of control. SAD,SAD,SAD...BUT ...She was MOM....🤔
She was always going to put her son first,especially as he was the Heir to the throne,protected.
She should not had listen to Charles and strip Diana of her title HR and sadden William who promise to give back.
@@joycemarshall1384 Its HRH and it was up to the queen, not Charles to decide whehter to let her keep it
I hate these 100% AI, bot-written videos. It got so many things wrong.
The AI bot-written are educating us to pay attention. What is real? What is clone? We are learning how to tell the difference, at least I am.
Too bad KC lll didn't inherit her spine, when it comes to Harry.
Too bad h didn't have a spine and say NO! when it came to being forced to marry Diana, a woman he did not love and consequently drove to her demise.
Harry is the one with the spine. He took his wife and child away from the dysfunctional royals and toxic tabloids. He chose to earn his own money while the royals keep on leeching off taxpayers to the tune of millions upon millions each year.
Sussex squad alert
And what is the Sussex squad. I keep seeing this noted here and there. Anyone want to enlighten me?
Allowing Harry & Megan to wed. That is the worst mistake she made in all her years of reigning.😭😭
But she allowed Charles and Camella to marry
Agree. She shouldn't have approved it
He should have not allowed Wm to marry Kate , for her own safety !!
Harry would have married Meghan anyway !!!
She allowed Charles to marry Camilla ! After him leaving Diana . maybe if she had helped Diana. , she mite be alive today ….
Omg! Get over Harry and Meghan. They left the UK. They don’t care about you. They are living their best lives far away from miserable England
Harry and Megan are happy. Good luck too them. I hope they never come back. They are the best royals by far.
Stripping Diana of HRH
😂