@@jazstudio1905 flatbeds aren't good at all for 35mm. they're great for medium format. the difference between a coolscan or a plustek vs a flatbed for 35mm is really noticeable.
remember when you use to have to take your cameras to those little shops just to get the end result of pics, it was always exciting getting it back in those large yellow envelopes, it was like opening a birthday gift
That's why I never became a photographer. The camera settings and film development was too much work. But with today's digital technology, I'm still not a photographer.
I also remember times when you get home with your yellow envelope, open it and half the pack was blanks because the film had been exposed to the light 😅 that was devastating.
Why not the best way? If scanned properly, the resolution quality would be about 2 MP. And with the external macro lens, the resulting scans should be about 6 megapixels per slide.
@@14bqdonk The image quality of phone cameras is quite awful and you can not get acceptable images by taking a wonky phone shot of a film negativ and converting it in some app. Why bother with film in the first place then.
c41 processing takes a lot longer then minutes, as well all the chemicals have to be a certain temperature, the film washed and dried in a clean environment.
If scanned properly, the resolution quality would be about 2 MP. And with the external macro lens, the resulting scans should be about 6 megapixels per slide/ negative.
@@Photomyneif you can only get 4MP with an external macro lens that kinda defeats the point. Your app is great for getting a quick low quality scan of a negative to get a visual of what’s on the negative before you give it a more proper scan. It’s okay, I have the app and that’s what I use it for. Let’s be honest. This isn’t an all in one scan system, anyone that is developing their own film is gunna also get a legit scanning system. This is good for people who found their parents old negatives and want to see what’s on em
I know people are hating on the video for them using their phone camera but it’s definitely a solid way to get the photos off quick if you don’t have much else gear or lab availability near you(or if you can’t afford the extra cost). Some ways to improve the results using a phone would be to -ensure you are shooting in macro mode -block off the light on the sides of the negative using something flat(this will also help make the negative stay flat when taking the photo). You can use some books stacked. That are equal in size -shoot in manual mode and put your on top of the books and leveled so that you are scanning as flat as possible. Set a short timer so u don’t have camera shake. By shooting in manual you can ensure you aren’t overexposing too much and get the sharpest image -try to make sure the height the phone is at allows you to fill the framing with as much of the negative as possible(this will ensure you get the most detail) -convert the negative to a positive using whatever external software/app you want. There are many free and cheap options that range in effectiveness. The main thing is to ensure your scan/picture of the negative is as detailed as you can get it. I’ve done the above to quickly take a look at some of my negatives before scanning them using a cheap used flatbed scanner. The flatbed scanner takes a long time and is a pain to keep negatives flat in. The flatbed scanner gave me better results than what I can achieve with my phone but I have been able to make solid 5x7 prints using my phone as the film scanner before Don’t let gear and costs hold you back from pursuing film shooting! It’s one of the most rewarding hobbies I’ve ever experienced!
@@madhanvasudevan7574 True, though this is intended for people that want to shoot film for whatever reason they choose. Nobody is stopping you from choosing to shoot on your phone
@@xipalips Again, nobody is forcing you to use one format over another, or that you can't switch things up mid-process. It's intended to show those interested that film doesn't need to be developed and scanned by labs as your only option
Not quite. A FF can more easily create subject separation whereas a phone camera's sensor is too small, so it has to fake it. Resolution wise, you're correct, but they wouldn't be the same picture.
With Photomyne, unlike taking a photo of a photo, you can enjoy our features that may help you scan your photos faster: - automatic cropping of multiple photos at once - auto rotate of photos that aren't oriented correctly - arranging your photos by date, event, or whatever you choose. - Digitize your negatives and slides. - You can access them from any device. - Sharpen and colorize your black and white photos. -Share them with your loved ones so they can edit them in real time! You can get more info from our website - www.photomyne.com
Do the whole process right, then ruin the photo taking a picture of it with your phone. It’s not the apps fault, it’s the phone cameras fault. In a pinch it’s fine, but otherwise get it scanned properly. Take it somewhere or buy a flatbed scanner. This is like slow cooking some barbecue ribs then putting it in the fridge to microwave later on.
the bare minimum get a system that flattens your film annd scans it, epson V600 is the way to go that way using your phone camera gets minimal detail and youre doing a disservice to your photograpy if that is how you want to get it digital.
That is your opinion and we respect it. We have millions of satisfied users who use our app but you can always check it out for yourself at Photomyne.com
@Photomyne it's not opinion it's fact. Phone camera sensors are too small to pick up any of the detail 35mm film has we know this it's not disputable. Negatives to phone apps have existed since the iPhone 3G. Unless you use a dedicated photo scanner or best case a full frame camera to take a picture of the slide when it's held flat in a light isolation box with a blacklight behind the film then convert it digitally to positive it's not going to do film shooting any justice.
Number one, you should be using a tripod to get the camera as close to the film as possible and a square as possible. That way you won’t need to use perspective correction which degrades the image quality by a lot depending on how extreme of an angle you’re holding your phone at. Number two you are using a phone. I get the phones have gotten really good at this point but this is a horrible way to do this. It’s good in a pinch, but my guy you should not be doing that. A used DSLR from 2008 with a macro lens would be much better. You didn’t even use the macro photography feature of your iPhone. I bet your app doesn’t even process the photo as raw meaning that using the default camera app in your iPhone will literally give you better quality. You don’t even have a film holder to prevent the film from warping. But number 3, all of this completely ignores that you’re shooting on an $8000 Leica. You are throwing away the quality of your camera if you scan your film with an iPhone in this way. Your app is a pretty simple way to post process negatives but your app really isn’t the problem. It’s the fact that you are using a phone to digitize your negatives. No amount of software engineering is going to fix that. Your website clearly shows people using tripods and film holders but you’re not using that in your demonstration. But it still completely ignores the fact that your app does not use the raw shooting capabilities of the iPhone. Using the default camera app or Lightroom is a superior option than shooting the photos in your app. I used an old scanner from 2004 and got better results than what your app could provide.
I use a DSLR now days: a lot quicker for the quality of end product if using right light source, lens type, and proper adapters. Especially if you scan the borders and know how to use the proper software.
Why do you think so- have you tried it? The final resolution of the photos you scan with Photomyne’s photo scanner app depends on two main factors: #1 The number of photos you take in a single shot (the distance of the phone camera from photos at the time of scanning). #2 The camera quality (megapixel specs) of the device you are using. Feel free to get in touch with support@photomyne.com so we can assist you to get the best photo resolution possible. You can get more information on our website - www.photomyne.com
@@Photomyne Basically because point 2, as you pointed out. Phone camera specs will be very behind from whathever you’ll get even from some crappy noritsu. No, i haven’t tried it, because i have access to a lab with coolscan v ed, which is literally the best 35mm scanner in existence(besides drum scanning options). This app may be useful for social network posts(as bad quality is irrelevant) or for quick “prototyping” of scans(when you’re not in the mood to scan whole roll on scanner)
Thank you for reaching out to us. If scanned properly, the resolution quality would be about 2 MP. And with the external macro lens, the resulting scans should be about 6 megapixels per slide.
Thank you for your comment. The light pad is designed to help you get the best scanning results as it illuminates the slides for a better results! Feel free to reach out to us at support@photomyne.com and we will gladly assist if you have any other questions.
I have a good mirrorless camera and great macro lens. How can I BATCH convert the Digital Negative into a Positive image without doing one at a Time in Paintshop?
Hi, it's possible to multiple photos are once and it will automatically crop. However, negatives and slides are too small to batch scan. The resolution would be too low
It actually might be the best way, but at the very least, the fastest. As bad as phone cameras are, even a cheap phone can make good 2MP images, which is about the resolution of 35mm. The colors will need a lot of correcting on anything less than a Pixel 5 though. I still think using a macro lens and a cheap mirrorless body is still a better cost alternative than buying a dedicated scanner though.
This is great for previewing images but it will not compete with a proper scan from a scanner or camera scanning setup. For any home developers who dont want to buy a scanner, look into camera scanning! Of course its only inexpensive if you have a digital camera already, but its a very easy and effecient way to scan images
Flatbed scanners are awesome but I can promise you that the quality is not that different when using your iPhone/Android camera, especially today where there are 12+megapixel cameras.
@@Photomyne it is different. The detail retention is noticably different between the two. Your method is not bad and is perfectly fine for sharing online, however.
No hay ningún problema por escanear un negativo. Al final siguen siendo técnicas igual de válidas. Incluso hay tipos de fotografía, como la solarigrafia, que si no se digitaliza nunca podrían ver la luz. Digitalizar una imagen no es el problema. El problema son los vídeos como éste!
Why are there so many haters? Im developing film shot on a $20 ebay camera using coffee grounds and cheap expired black and white film. I cant afford a photo scanner or lab
If scanned properly, the resolution quality would be about 2 MP. And with the external macro lens, the resulting scans should be about 6 megapixels per slide.
> Has $8,000 camera
> Doesn’t want to pay $5 for high quality lab scans
i think its just that it takes long
It feels more involved to develop your own.
lab scan kinda sucks tho. its better using a flatbed scanner
@@jazstudio1905 flatbeds aren't good at all for 35mm. they're great for medium format. the difference between a coolscan or a plustek vs a flatbed for 35mm is really noticeable.
@@jazstudio190535mm flat bed scanns kinda suck tho... its better using a dedicated film scanner, like a plustek 7500.
Scanning negatives on your phone is CRAZY😭
I can guarantee bro only scanned with his phone for an ad
The results are amazing though :)
@@Photomyne no they’re actually really really terrible.
I can say that i scan them on my phone but i dont use a app- i just take them into photoshop/lightroom and reverse/color correct them there
@@catt8822yeah but that’s just to preview the negs affordable scanning solutions are not that hard to find
remember when you use to have to take your cameras to those little shops just to get the end result of pics, it was always exciting getting it back in those large yellow envelopes, it was like opening a birthday gift
Im always ordering prints with my Negatives, even if I can print at home 😅 like you say, its exciting
@@SonOfWalhall
😂 you definitely enjoy the little things in life
That's why I never became a photographer. The camera settings and film development was too much work. But with today's digital technology, I'm still not a photographer.
Not when your pictures look like crap 😭
I also remember times when you get home with your yellow envelope, open it and half the pack was blanks because the film had been exposed to the light 😅 that was devastating.
"Best" way? No. Cheap way? Yes.
Why not the best way? If scanned properly, the resolution quality would be about 2 MP.
And with the external macro lens, the resulting scans should be about 6 megapixels per slide.
@@Photomyne Film is a chemical reaction, and is way more than 2 MP, you are losing it all with the phone, still works, but could be better
@@Photomyne2 mp is ridiculously low res for film
@@Photomyne bro wtf get a scanner if youre using a camera that costs thousands of Euros lmao
@Photomyne No 35mm film has 8-12 MP resolution
This is so sad to watch
why?
Thanks for reminding me of this video. A film photographer pissed me off recently. I am going to traumatize her by sharing this video to her 😂
@@14bqdonk took pic with 8000 dollar camera, scanned negative with phone camera
@@14bqdonk The image quality of phone cameras is quite awful and you can not get acceptable images by taking a wonky phone shot of a film negativ and converting it in some app. Why bother with film in the first place then.
@@kunstsein why?
I am sorry, but this is the reason why people think bad quality = film 😢
Just take it to a lab, yea this WORKS but if you can afford a $300 dev kit, you can afford $15 for a scan at high DPI
They aren’t that much for just b/w development
@@westonwright6113 the prosecution rests then. It's cheap and won't look like horse shit if you take it to a lab. That was fun, goodbye
@@av.punk.801 are you bad at developing film and making formulas up then take it to a lab don’t bitch your bad at it
Those chemicals and a Patterson tank are like 60 bucks lol
@Uknowjustin true but storage, proper heating and proper neutralizer and disposal makes for about $280 + S&H. I recognize a lot of that kit
c41 processing takes a lot longer then minutes, as well all the chemicals have to be a certain temperature, the film washed and dried in a clean environment.
You misspelled "worst way"
So absolute best case scenario. Your get iPhone image quality?
Nah, im good thanks
If scanned properly, the resolution quality would be about 2 MP.
And with the external macro lens, the resulting scans should be about 6 megapixels per slide/ negative.
@@Photomyneif you can only get 4MP with an external macro lens that kinda defeats the point. Your app is great for getting a quick low quality scan of a negative to get a visual of what’s on the negative before you give it a more proper scan. It’s okay, I have the app and that’s what I use it for. Let’s be honest. This isn’t an all in one scan system, anyone that is developing their own film is gunna also get a legit scanning system. This is good for people who found their parents old negatives and want to see what’s on em
I know people are hating on the video for them using their phone camera but it’s definitely a solid way to get the photos off quick if you don’t have much else gear or lab availability near you(or if you can’t afford the extra cost).
Some ways to improve the results using a phone would be to
-ensure you are shooting in macro mode
-block off the light on the sides of the negative using something flat(this will also help make the negative stay flat when taking the photo). You can use some books stacked. That are equal in size
-shoot in manual mode and put your on top of the books and leveled so that you are scanning as flat as possible. Set a short timer so u don’t have camera shake. By shooting in manual you can ensure you aren’t overexposing too much and get the sharpest image
-try to make sure the height the phone is at allows you to fill the framing with as much of the negative as possible(this will ensure you get the most detail)
-convert the negative to a positive using whatever external software/app you want. There are many free and cheap options that range in effectiveness. The main thing is to ensure your scan/picture of the negative is as detailed as you can get it.
I’ve done the above to quickly take a look at some of my negatives before scanning them using a cheap used flatbed scanner. The flatbed scanner takes a long time and is a pain to keep negatives flat in. The flatbed scanner gave me better results than what I can achieve with my phone but I have been able to make solid 5x7 prints using my phone as the film scanner before
Don’t let gear and costs hold you back from pursuing film shooting! It’s one of the most rewarding hobbies I’ve ever experienced!
A much easier way is to shoot on the phone itself😂
@@madhanvasudevan7574 True, though this is intended for people that want to shoot film for whatever reason they choose. Nobody is stopping you from choosing to shoot on your phone
Oooor just buy a dslr/milc with a macro lens, which people have done so with great results in the past.
@@andrewrobotbuilderWhy but expensive film cameras just to have a shitty smart phone pic? Buy digital if you don't want film
@@xipalips Again, nobody is forcing you to use one format over another, or that you can't switch things up mid-process. It's intended to show those interested that film doesn't need to be developed and scanned by labs as your only option
It's give me vibe of One Hour Photo with Robin Williams
Lol, would be much faster if you took the pic with your phone in the first place... quality wise it would be the same anyway😂😂😂
Not quite. A FF can more easily create subject separation whereas a phone camera's sensor is too small, so it has to fake it.
Resolution wise, you're correct, but they wouldn't be the same picture.
Take a picture from a picture
With Photomyne, unlike taking a photo of a photo, you can enjoy our features that may help you scan your photos faster:
- automatic cropping of multiple photos at once
- auto rotate of photos that aren't oriented correctly
- arranging your photos by date, event, or whatever you choose.
- Digitize your negatives and slides.
- You can access them from any device.
- Sharpen and colorize your black and white photos.
-Share them with your loved ones so they can edit them in real time!
You can get more info from our website - www.photomyne.com
If you're going to use your phone to photograph the picture anyway. Just snap the original with that same phone
Do the whole process right, then ruin the photo taking a picture of it with your phone. It’s not the apps fault, it’s the phone cameras fault. In a pinch it’s fine, but otherwise get it scanned properly. Take it somewhere or buy a flatbed scanner. This is like slow cooking some barbecue ribs then putting it in the fridge to microwave later on.
This is just an example of what you can do with negatives, slides and photos you have :)
That’s pretty damn cool
I used these cameras.
Sweet memories
the bare minimum get a system that flattens your film annd scans it, epson V600 is the way to go that way using your phone camera gets minimal detail and youre doing a disservice to your photograpy if that is how you want to get it digital.
That is your opinion and we respect it. We have millions of satisfied users who use our app but you can always check it out for yourself at Photomyne.com
@Photomyne it's not opinion it's fact. Phone camera sensors are too small to pick up any of the detail 35mm film has we know this it's not disputable. Negatives to phone apps have existed since the iPhone 3G. Unless you use a dedicated photo scanner or best case a full frame camera to take a picture of the slide when it's held flat in a light isolation box with a blacklight behind the film then convert it digitally to positive it's not going to do film shooting any justice.
@@PhotomyneI'm sorry that your opinion doesn't reflect reality
What camera is that???
This is the worst way to scan your negatives
Why do you think so- have you tried the app?
Number one, you should be using a tripod to get the camera as close to the film as possible and a square as possible. That way you won’t need to use perspective correction which degrades the image quality by a lot depending on how extreme of an angle you’re holding your phone at. Number two you are using a phone. I get the phones have gotten really good at this point but this is a horrible way to do this. It’s good in a pinch, but my guy you should not be doing that. A used DSLR from 2008 with a macro lens would be much better. You didn’t even use the macro photography feature of your iPhone. I bet your app doesn’t even process the photo as raw meaning that using the default camera app in your iPhone will literally give you better quality. You don’t even have a film holder to prevent the film from warping. But number 3, all of this completely ignores that you’re shooting on an $8000 Leica. You are throwing away the quality of your camera if you scan your film with an iPhone in this way.
Your app is a pretty simple way to post process negatives but your app really isn’t the problem. It’s the fact that you are using a phone to digitize your negatives. No amount of software engineering is going to fix that.
Your website clearly shows people using tripods and film holders but you’re not using that in your demonstration. But it still completely ignores the fact that your app does not use the raw shooting capabilities of the iPhone. Using the default camera app or Lightroom is a superior option than shooting the photos in your app.
I used an old scanner from 2004 and got better results than what your app could provide.
@@Photomyneapp name?
라이카 오너가 스캐너가 없는ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
You could just get a scanner and scan the images or the negatives
I use a DSLR now days: a lot quicker for the quality of end product if using right light source, lens type, and proper adapters. Especially if you scan the borders and know how to use the proper software.
@@karl1137 ok
This is an example of how you can scan negatives, slides and photos using our app :)
Remember when they had 1-hour labs at the store
Even crappy lab scan will be better
Why do you think so- have you tried it? The final resolution of the photos you scan with Photomyne’s photo scanner app depends on two main factors:
#1 The number of photos you take in a single shot (the distance of the phone camera from photos at the time of scanning).
#2 The camera quality (megapixel specs) of the device you are using. Feel free to get in touch with support@photomyne.com so we can assist you to get the best photo resolution possible.
You can get more information on our website - www.photomyne.com
@@Photomyne Basically because point 2, as you pointed out. Phone camera specs will be very behind from whathever you’ll get even from some crappy noritsu. No, i haven’t tried it, because i have access to a lab with coolscan v ed, which is literally the best 35mm scanner in existence(besides drum scanning options). This app may be useful for social network posts(as bad quality is irrelevant) or for quick “prototyping” of scans(when you’re not in the mood to scan whole roll on scanner)
great, thanks, i will try it out.
This makes as much sense as demanding a manual shift car and then getting an ai robot to drive it
This is just an example of how you can scan your negatives, slides and photos you already have :)
bro your hack works
Thank you so much bro
I wonder if there is a world record "Fastest time to develope film"
You're down grading you negative by millions , defeating the object.
Thank you for reaching out to us. If scanned properly, the resolution quality would be about 2 MP.
And with the external macro lens, the resulting scans should be about 6 megapixels per slide.
Cant develop this and scan the prints?
His shirt 😍
How about scanning it through printer?
Which liquid was it?
You did c41 development at home ?
which camera is that
Not a bad set up, but take the photo of the negative on a dslr instead of your iPhone.
Why not have it all in your device for your convenience and great results? :)
Sorry it does not do justice to those negatives.
This is just an example of what you can do with your existing negatives, slides and photos using Photomyne :)
Just want to know the cost of each movie i am watching up front. Is therr a a way to dp that?
Please reach out to us at support@photomyne.com and we will gladly assist.
I want to know what light pad is that
Thank you for your comment. The light pad is designed to help you get the best scanning results as it illuminates the slides for a better results! Feel free to reach out to us at support@photomyne.com and we will gladly assist if you have any other questions.
I have a good mirrorless camera and great macro lens. How can I BATCH convert the Digital Negative into a Positive image without doing one at a Time in Paintshop?
Hi, it's possible to multiple photos are once and it will automatically crop. However, negatives and slides are too small to batch scan. The resolution would be too low
It actually might be the best way, but at the very least, the fastest.
As bad as phone cameras are, even a cheap phone can make good 2MP images, which is about the resolution of 35mm. The colors will need a lot of correcting on anything less than a Pixel 5 though.
I still think using a macro lens and a cheap mirrorless body is still a better cost alternative than buying a dedicated scanner though.
why does you putting in those film sound likes the intro to 20th century movies
There’s probably some application for this to preview a single frame but I don’t see this being a part of any film photography work flow tbh
*showing how great the result is from a 2m distance / big smile* lol
To think of all the time you could have saved just using your cell phone in the first place.
This is just an example of what you can do with Photomyne Photo Scan to scan your photos, negatives and slides.
Loading sounds like fox studio theme ..
What camera is that?
It’s a Leica camera, idk the model
@@JohnQuinones69mp
This is great for previewing images but it will not compete with a proper scan from a scanner or camera scanning setup. For any home developers who dont want to buy a scanner, look into camera scanning! Of course its only inexpensive if you have a digital camera already, but its a very easy and effecient way to scan images
Flatbed scanners are awesome but I can promise you that the quality is not that different when using your iPhone/Android camera, especially today where there are 12+megapixel cameras.
@@Photomyne it is different. The detail retention is noticably different between the two. Your method is not bad and is perfectly fine for sharing online, however.
@@Photomynestop gaslighting
Might as well find/order old films, develop them on your phone - post compilation/story as a short.
Boom, made a series
yeh pani konsa tha
naam kya h
What’s the name of the app?
Photomyne Photo Scan
Minutes. Yeah right.
Which app you used
It's called Photomyne, available for iOS and Android devices
It’s an add I tried the app it’s under the same name as the account but doesn’t properly turn it into a positive picture
Hi Elena, it does turn negatives in to photos. Maybe you didn't change the scanning mode. Please reach out to support@photomyne.com so we can assist
Hipsters gonna keep the hipe anyhow
What is the name of this Movie reading app? Thank you very much
Photomyne Photo Scan
yesssssss
All that just to scan it was a smartphone lmao
Whats the name sir...!!? And android version
Photomyne is available in the Google Play Store :)
What's the camera model?
It looks like a Leica MP, which will run you ~$6,000 not including the lens.
Join us next week when we'll be scanning disposable camera negs on a flextight x5
Never use phone for scaning film. Macro lens & digital camera + raw format = good result.
Why do you think so? Have you tried our app? :)
I watched so many different videos made my head spin then I’m thinking I’ll just pay to get them developed
Please reach out to us at support@photomyne.com and we will gladly assist!
What the heeeeelllllll this is why people think analog photography is always bad Quality
That’s brilliantly absurd
It is an example of what you can do with your existing negatives, photos and slides :)
Bro just scan that 💀
What is the chemical he added? What is it for?
Film developer
Wait what?!
astig!
What is the liquid for?
Developing
for everyone that’s upset, just think maybe he has a scanner (or access to one) and is doing the phone capture just for the video ?
Photomyne is the scanner he needs to scan his negatives :)
What app was that?
Photomyne! Check it out on the App Store and Google Play :)
what's the point of use film and then covert to digital?
No hay ningún problema por escanear un negativo. Al final siguen siendo técnicas igual de válidas.
Incluso hay tipos de fotografía, como la solarigrafia, que si no se digitaliza nunca podrían ver la luz.
Digitalizar una imagen no es el problema. El problema son los vídeos como éste!
Show me the final result
The results are amazing :) Try it yourself and you will see :)
Why are there so many haters? Im developing film shot on a $20 ebay camera using coffee grounds and cheap expired black and white film. I cant afford a photo scanner or lab
What app is that ?
Photomyne
😮
🙃
Photomyne app check it out www. photomyne.com
dont get it, it has horrible quality
I see no sens of taking analog to scan it to phone later. Is so misunderstood for me 🤷
Some people just love the feel of a camera in their hands :) Also- it was an example of how the app can scan negatives.
Wait...so take a digital picture, of your analog picture so that you have a digital version of the analog....
This is just an example of how you can use Photomyne to scan your existing negatives, slides and photos.
@@Photomyne thank you!
good luck lmao
Which app to
Photomyne Photo Scan :)
Just use macro lens/tubes and take a photo on your digital camera? It gives you 10 times better quality
Use film at the end to convert to digital? Why not just start with digital?
This is just an example of what you can do with Photomyne Photo Scan and your existing slides, photos and negatives!
So it’s an ad…but also shows me why I should just buy a digital camera?
It is just an example of how you can use Photomyne to scan your existing photos, negatives and slides :)
What app
Photomyne Photo Scan
Witch app you usd
Photomyne Photo Scan
app name?
Photomyne Photo Scan
Thats probably the worst imaginable way, but go ahead.
Why do you think so? Have you tried our app? We have a millions of satisfied users :)
'Best' way is subjective. 'A' way is acceptable. A 'simplified and beginner-friendly' way would be a more accurate title
If scanned properly, the resolution quality would be about 2 MP.
And with the external macro lens, the resulting scans should be about 6 megapixels per slide.
Whats the app called
Photomyne Photo Scan
i love how there is no music
That's to make it seem like an authentic video, but LOOK at the channel name ...it's clickbait MADE by the makers of this CRAPPY app 🤷
Making pictures of pictures😅
He could buy a photo enlarger
Zenit and now M100 😂😂😂😂
What app was that???
It's called Photomyne, available for iOS and Android devices
Best way to get comments on your video more like
Picture clearing app
App name
Photomyne
What is the app
Photomyne Photo Scan :)
lol you people personally trashing this guy for using the very nice camera handed to him by the creative director for an app to use in their ad