Call of Duty Modern Warfare II vs Battlefield 2042 - Attention to Detail Comparison
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 4. 06. 2024
- In this video I show a full comparison of details Call of Duty Modern Warfare II Beta vs Battlefield 2042 video completely filmed by me (GameBest) I show which game is better in physics and details
If you liked this video, please don't forget to subscribe and like. Thanks for watchingđđ
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 vs Battlefield 2042
Call of Duty vs Battlefield
Timing:
0:00 - Water Physics
1:20 - Climb a Ladder
1:58 - Shooting at car Tires
2:42 - Glass Physics
3:24 - Swimming
4:04 - Healing Animation
4:24 - Peek Door
5:10 - Tank
5:58 - Bullet tracks
6:09 - Single mode and Auto mode
6:38 - Smok Grenade Effects
7:11 - Shoot Through
8:00 - Grenade Crater
#callofduty #codmodernwarfare2 #battlefield #battlefield2042 - Hry
![Eminem - Houdini [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/22tVWwmTie8/mqdefault.jpg)
Never thought I'd see the day when call of duty games would look more detailed than the latest battlefield game
so i have only watched for 20 seconds now and battlefield stands out by miles, lets see what cod has in store then that its better :)
edit: yup alot of details look really good
Battle field has fallen so much
@@dirk6503 first of its beta footage and they changed it a lot since then and second idk what your talking about mw2 looks a lot better and more realistic
@@SalihAhmad597 no it doesn't even right now the grenade craters still look like a flat picture image which I honestly don't care Call of Duty could look like Black Ops 1 for all I care because Graphics should not be that big of a deal when buying a game but Battlefield looks way better as of now
@@SalihAhmad597 Only speaking of the first 2 shots, what would happen if you would shoot a bullet in water would you see the water splash from mw2 or the wave effect from bf?
I used to think graphics are the main decider but call of duty has proved to me that badass animations give a game the edge
Cods graphics aren't bad at all either lol
Cod is good
@@yonsetv5223 but when graphics and detail are put together itâs great
@@thev87 No
@@ThunderWunder18 csgo?
Pistol grip and pistol manipulations are so good and realistic in MW2
Try Insurgency Sandstorm
â@@pdebie1982 Apples and oranges. Of course Insurgency's gonna have better attention to detail when it comes to weapon handling, they know their audience will pick up on that stuff because it's marketed as a realistic shooter. COD getting that stuff right is more incredible because it's for the unwashed masses who generally don't care as much about how a weapon handles irl
game is solid, the game engine is insane, and battlefield looks like it's plastic
â@@pdebie1982 sad that the developers just want cash grabs and dont care about the game anymore...have met so many good friends and had the funniest moments in my whole gaming career on that gameđ€Ł
you kno8w52w+
hat
oth
e
r
grip
i
s
r
ea
l
i
a
bl
e
The one thing I see is that both games got things that we didnât have 10 years ago. Yes each game performs better than the other in some aspects but think about the amount of hours developers and game programmers spent to release a great product. If it were easy we all would do this. Awesome work to all involved and o enjoyed the video.
buena reflexion compa
tbh battlefield 1 had all this things and even has a lot more details than battlefield 2042 and mwII together and will probably still have more details than the cod/battlefield that will launch in 3 years when it becomes 10 years old. Cod evolves slowly while bf2042 downgraded the saga, even battlefield 4 which is 10 years old is as detailed as bf 2042 in lots of things and maybe as mwII.
The coolest detail mw2 has is that it's got players
Edit : beware bf & cod fan boys are in a Ground war match down there
Savageđ
And the coolest detail in bf2042 is that it don't got any campaign and didn't either have any animations better than mw.
And also the most shocking detail is none of the games from bf series is free to play, on the other hand cod got Warzone, mobile version, and upcoming warzone 2. đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±
@@nassxt9031 Damn basically the same game but one its for mobile and the other it's "a sequel". Oh and it's just fk battleroyale.
As an OG Battlefielder..... that stung đđ but you aint wrong hahaha
infinity ward used water physics for the first time and they completely nailed it.
â@@user-mm2pv8xi6h goofy ah bot đ
@@user-mm2pv8xi6h who care?
Battlefield looked better
@@2.3T_Candle some of them
But bf did a good job ngl
I agree that COD has grown leaps and bounds and is finally almost up to par with battlefield. But the one thing cod doesnât have that makes bf better is the destructive environment. With that being said Iâll still be playing mw2 over 2042
Except BF2042 has none.
@@DepthFromAbove you are talking about levolution which cod has yet to even do let alone make holes in walls with c4.
@@aandr941 BF 2042 has nothing. It goes in the BF Cops & Robbers bin with games that donât count as part of the franchise.
@@aandr941 BF2042 lacks the level of levolution BF3 and BF4 had. The franchise digressed big time.
Not to mention, COD has attempted levolution in COD Ghosts back in 2013. It wasn't as good as BF, but still the reception was poor. No-one wants a map that allows new likes of sites to open up in a fast paced game like COD
And plus, if you take graphics and realism away from Battlefield it has nothing. If you take those away from call of duty, we still have a masterpiece.
6:17 there is a switching sound, I'm guessing yours is just glitched out
It's crazy how they had popping tires and bullet surface penetration in BFV.
Just left it out of 2042, like mostly everything else.
I remember them having that when I was playing a while ago but I think they took it off
Omg, tyre popping? No way, literally unplayable
@@thebigsam little details makes a game better
Btf is fun, I wish sniper bullets are faster and soldiers can get tired when running
@@midhunmathew6121 who the fuck goes around and shoots tiresđ. Play the game, thatâs what matters most
in BF2042 you can also use stim and, in healing animation, hold the button for proper animation.
I love them both
Gotta love using narcotics
@@riddell26 lmao đ€Ł
True!
yeah this guy left those out for a reason, obviously a cod fanboy
Being a fan of both games - and owning (and playing many hours of both) - both games are fun. You canât go wrong with either, but there are MANY differences, in both the pace of the game and strategy. BF2042 has specialists.. which add another dimension to the game in multiplayer. MW2 doesnât have that, but it has other things to offset that. Imo, BF2042 is more difficult to master and is overall, more difficult. MW2 is just raw fun. I love them both. If you want to just grab a gun and rank up kills, but also die in a blink of an eye, then MW2 is for you.
L opinion
Idc about objective theoretical shit when bf2042 is complete garbage to play
the dimension that most specialists in bf are useless just play assault
I feel like it depends on what you are experienced more in. I have played a decent amount of cod, but it is bf2042 that I can almost always get top of the leaderboard, sometimes with little trouble.
@@Yungkhalifa14bad take
â@@arcanum3882 specialist are trash
i havent played MW2 but I cannot imagine the maps are as massive as 2042s maps. Right now having maps as vast as they are in 2042 there likely had to be some sacrifices in details or the game files would be ridiculous.
COD maps have always been way smaller than Battlefield maps always been that way Iol
Je préfÚre COD au moins on cours pas trois kilomÚtres pour rien et encore ... Je précise je suis level 120 sur bf2042 donc j'ai pas 1h de jeu
Remember when Battlefield was usually winning against COD? Well, now it seems like the card changed.
still is
@@leunreadablypossible6835 How come?
@@clementine3836 aside from weapon details, battlefield has a better handle on the enviroments, the buildings and overall details of the maps, the guns are plausible, and dont look like someone would say its trash
mw 2's gameplay is fast paced, battlefield 2042 is also now getting that fast paced gameplay, and its honestly better (tactical conquest)
@@leunreadablypossible6835 You know, you are actually right. I mean Call of Duty combat is very fast meanwhile Battlefiled is more tactical and fun
@@clementine3836 the new game is not fun and you canât even find anyone half the time
Battlefield's graphics are impressive, but they always feel like I'm looking at an interactive photo with lots of filters. In the case of MW/MW2 it usually really feels like the objects are there and it leaves a better taste in my mouth.
You should stop licking all the objects bro.
@@wonkydonk9073 đđđđ
Licking your monitor should always taste the same no matter what game you are playing
@Pavle Popovic then the salty flavor is normal
Funny, your mom said the same thing to me about my johnson
The animation when you're inside the smoke in Battlefield was great and lifelike, and should be adopted by COD too!
Yeah cod had the same problem with smoke being very unrealistic in 2019 aswell, unfortunate
@@abdur4754 the smoke air drop has a different smoke than the grenade and it's awsome; just enough haze to block view and not enough that it's unrealistic.
cod has fallen so much now
@@anasgame5685 yeah, it used to be the best but now activision just cares about money
I truly think that COD has incredible effects when talking about infantry effects (one thing that always enjoyed was the bullet penetration on the walls).
However, BF always offered a bunch of ways of playing: by air, water or ground.
I think BF2042 did it good bringing to us the nostalgy of old maps and weapons in this version in a future stylish way, but I miss some physics that I would expect to be improved in it.
remember cod mw2 is still in beta test where as bf2042 released over an year ago
Donât matter
@@Souls_25 doesnt matter* obviously cod still beats bf 2042 even in beta LMAO
@@Souls_25 Yes, it does, it should be embarassing that a gem released 1 year ago by a company who have always excelled in visual aspects, especially water physics, is doing worse than a game in beta testing made by a company that doesn't put a lot of work in visuals aspects, like again, water physics
Mw2 may be still in the beta but somehow they always manage to destroy every single inch of their own game with their updates like back then they did with mw 2019
@@aadixya LMAO I KNOW. But not in graphics, and tanks and vehicles and destruction đ lol. But hey mw is better at guns tho lol
I really like the recoil effects in the new modern warfare
Bots like the "Giveaway Creep" won't leave you and other user alone. They kept coming back.
I think the recoil is really all visual in the new MW2 pistols as far as I know have zero actual recoil just visually they look like they have recoil
@@pingaspearce9403 maybe trust but with rifles itâs definitely there, I like it because the recoil is realistic and makes It harder to control but the time to kill is much shorter
@@pingaspearce9403 havent used the revolver and deagle i take it? or the glock 18...
Typical COD fan, many useless visual effects and no need for shooting skills
8:15 "Grenade Crater"
*uses rocket launcher*
2:23 damn where can I buy those tires
It's due to 2042. Maybe they made highly durable tires!
Never Thought that someday COD Will Blown Out BF in terms of Relism and attention to details
@@user-mm2pv8xi6h xd?
I wouldn't say blown out. Cod doesn't even have craters or destruction and the vehicle gameplay is kinda lack
@@tacituskilgore80 obvious things But In attention to detail it's still better cod does not have destruction Cause it cod No Bf
@@tacituskilgore80 my brother in christ BF does not have destruction anymore
That's because DICE has become fuking lazy
Another thing driving me nuts, NPC teammates Blocking doorways by standing in the way is also very annoying. You should automatically put one hand on a teammate and push them off to the side as youâre walking through.
czcams.com/video/EJD6hcSP3tI/video.html
In any game; same goes with walls and object clipping.
I agree. I also find unrealistic that you could aim down sights using both hands while swimming in water in Battlefield 2042. You shouldn't be able to aim like that, even if you could you would instantly sink
@@bwezcwez8864 ever heard of treading water?
Both games offer details that both out to have. From peaking in the doors to a changing landscape to simple animations.
Battlefield has a healing animation. You just have to hold down on the button you pull the syringe out with.
I just want bad co 2 to be back. Those were the battlefield days.
8:14 bro got a Wi-Fi on his grenade launcher XD
You can drive the APC in Water in MW2
Beta of MW2 looks more fixed as finished bf42
Fax
Not really
@@SURO90 It's all fax, I'm sorry call of duty finally beats battlefield for you.
the water really surprised me in MW2 when i first played. The physics of it and the way you swim and float and your buoyancy is all so slick
I honestly believe the lack of a campaign in Bf2042 caused them to not put much detail into the small things like glass shattering and tires popping. Had they did a campaign, Iâm sure they wouldâve focused on those details more. MW2 takes the cake on this one unfortunately.
There is no better way to destress after a long day of work than hopping on for a few matches in Shipment 24/7. Honestly wish they'd just keep that mode on forever.
@@JinghisKhan
Hopping on CoD to destress is a big no for me unless Iâm playing with friends lol
Anything involving guns and infantry MW2 is superior but anything involving vehicles, 2042 is still wayy ahead. Sure you can move around in the transport heli, but flying the damn thing feels like controlling a crain carrying a school bus. Even worse is that the most innocuous shit in the environment like wooden crates somehow stops your 50 ton tank dead in its tracks
End of conversation. This comment should be bumped to the top. How can anyone give a shit about the water physics when a tank can't move beyond a wooden crate? It's the dumbest comparison ever.
Or a bush
You gotta take into account the size of the maps in terms of how much detail the devs can put in without effecting performance. Like Cods biggest map from beta was 2 zones out of 8 on a big battlefield map, meaning they can add more details in a smaller space.
Thatâs on them. The details matter only if you can actually see them in-game. It was their decision to make 128 player maps. Past battlefields were perfectly fine running details in large scale maps.
@soft_dicc dudes right, battlefield really dropped the ball
Na bro do u understand how section rendering works?đ there is never a time where everything is rendered everywhere in the map at once. Things render in as you get close to them, thatâs why you see things pop in sometimes. They just didnât make a good Battle field and thatâs it.
@@okay4902 right
czcams.com/video/EJD6hcSP3tI/video.html
I find the underwater stuff kind of funny since CoD already got this fairly decent back in Black Ops 3. The comparison is still excellent however, good work my guy!
4:18 is purposefully misleading. they left out the actual animations for healing urself with the med gun or stimming your self.
the water in mw looks realistic bf one looks like a bowl of can soda
The stim in Battlefield 2042 doesn't have to be shot. If you press and hold the command for picking the stim-gun, Falck will self-heal, e. g. inject the stim right into her arm
2:09 "switching to your pistol is faster than reloading." And he switched to his Glock after his M4 ran out. An man of culture this guy is.
A surprise to be sure but a welcome one.
Would be more fair to compare it to Bf5, as 2042 is a downgrade from it
BF5 was already a downgrade compared to BF1 lol
But 2042 is ânext genâ lmao
@@BGLucia but not much
I enjoyed playing bf5
@@BGLucia bf5 wasnt too bad, still not as good as bf1 though but 2042 is a colossal failure
Bf4?
Shooting at water isnât a physics attribute of the water. It is a hit effect. You apply it to a surface (including water) and it plays back the effect.
Never thought I would say this but...I think I'm going to be playing COD this year
Yeah man those smok grenade effects are banging
4:10, im pretty sure there is a stim gadget in 2042, the "Med Pen", that all specialists can use, wouldve been better comparison
I adore BFâs water because of itâs color. But the animation of the MW2022âs water looks really good. Both are nice step ups to the next gen of fps games.
Really interesting to see that geaphics are more important than gameplay. So if there is a native 8K Edition of BF3, that would be the next gen of fps?
In my Opinion the next gen of fps is already avaible. Just look at "Pavlov".
That in a larger scale with nice graphics would be awesome. But currently system requirments would be a joke for the most people out there.
@@di4mondpl4ys45 graphics really arenât more important than gameplay. Notice how BF2042 has 6 total players despite looking pretty good at this point.
â@@di4mondpl4ys45 well duh we're talking about graphics and details here. nobody said anything about gameplay...
đ€Ł
@@jdg1251 But it looks like most people here thinking of next gen games/fps in graphic and animation terms and not about gameplay.
Thanks for the thumbnail idea for my video!!
For the fire rate change on the gun, there was sound in MW19. Seems like they forgot to code it in MW2
In Battlefield you can also hold 3 to heal. then there is also an animation .-.
edit: the healing syringes are even available as an extra tool. and there is also an animation for that
I can't believe 2042 failed this badly, the hype was there, it had the budget, how did it go to shit ?! I'll give credit where it's due, some of the small things that 2042 did were good, but they put there priorities in the wrong area
EA games
its not even that bad tho, especially if you've played the game decently. And the game is the best looking FPS game out rn
â@@woopdedo7939 đ€Łđ€Ł
@@woopdedo7939 I'm sorry but at this point I rather play vanguard cause it has so much more content from release till now compared to what 2042 launched and what is added (Which it added very little and it's been a year since it launched) EA and dice could give 2 shits about the game at this point, sledgehammer at least cared and listened to the community the first time they were told the community didn't like about vanguard.
@@vinicioscruz6948 pay for everything
2:33 it's only that the car have bulletproof tires
Both games are rocking truly and extremely fun to play.. The devs really from both games are really trying to keep all of us happy with extra content and more...CODMW2 really has took it to the top.. I'm happy with both companies and can't wait to see next-gen or some more UE5 games or some added in UE5 MODDED on to both of those games. All around both are really great and a true treasure to play...
Iâm pretty sure they changed the water in campaign and it looks a lot better. Also sad how beta cod did better then full release battle field
As far as bullet penetration goes I've seen a .22 shoot through 4 layers of drywall and then a space heater
The fact the tires dont pop in battlefield surprised me. And the fact tires popped in call of duty surprised me đ
In bf5 tyres pop . Maybe in 2042 tyres have new technology which resist the popping of tyre .
@@KurianfromIndia impossible and the way you spell tire oh jesus
@@unitedkingdom4304 British spelling
The attention to detail especially in the weapons for MW2 sold me. As someone who has used many of these weapons, they were spot on.
While call of duty is better, you forgot to use the proper self-heal method at 4:14. I believe there's a key dedicated to it with its own animation
8:04 Tessellation was broken during the BETA for MWII in comparison to post launch Battlefield 2042
No itâs not. Cod is just plain old cod
it is not better at all
Lol ok
Yeah, you're right.
@@leunreadablypossible6835 how is it not?
Iâll say for the bullet water effects battle field looks a lot better but driving in it and just in general itâs mw2
From what I've seen, both MW2 and BF2042 trade blows in what they do better and don't. I've played the betas of both games and enjoyed both.
Thank you bro bf2042 is so slept on
@@Broadfieldbouncearound They've dramatically improved it. Worth getting XBGP or PCGP for the EA Play games including BF2042.
CoD MW focuses on tactical piont of view. While battlefield focuses on slight reality touch to it.
I'm starting to think bf2042 decided to remove some slight detail so they could better optimize the game, I can't even imagine adding features that will greatly affect performance while simultaneously active in 128 players game mode.
Then they should drop the 128 players, i'd rather have the details of BF4-1-5, tires, water physics, animations, shoot through, landscape alteration, incredible destruction, ... BF would have won absolutely every single round here and would have needed another 10 minutes video on top of that if we were speaking about one of these games.
@@khorneflakes2175 yeah 128 player mod is bad and game still have optimization problems.
7:14 that's the strongest drywall I've ever seen đ€Ł
It's a BETA
@@moisescruz3353 or pistol rounds
i need a cup of that 2042 water look crazyđ
4:25 In COD all doors are automatic even wooden doors, you dont have to touch it to open or CLOSE! In BF there is an actual animation of touching the door.
5:22 in COD every tank has hidden portal where you enter in an instant. In BF there's an actual animation when entering a vehicle.
not once have i seen an animation for entering a tank
and ive played almost all the battlefields
it is the same as COD
it's vehicles that have the animation
but i don't even remember those for battlefield either
BF also has automatic doors for many buildings. You can claim control of these doors for your team, then they're harder/longer to open for the other team, who can take control back too. It helps a bit for defending a point.
@TIS Plays as far as I can remember theres always animations on BFV when entering or exiting a tank. Thats why you are vulnerable to be attacked while entering or exiting because it isnt instant like magic like in COD lol
@@TIS_Plays apparently you havenât played battefield 1 one of the best
Bf 2042 was made by another beginner team.Unlike a bfv and previous bf games.
Wait I thought they were made by the same DICE Stockholm team
@@35_xe_raghavpatil67 pretty sure the other old devs left to build their own business
You missed the Med Pen healing animation in 2042, as well as the self heal for Falck (who uses the same healing gun).
Infinity Ward to Dice: Oh , I see. You deny your engine its purpose.
I play both games, and i think each have their own qualities. But in BF 2042, I feel more realistic, like I'm really in a war, idk how to explain, the sound quality, the whole thing feels real. BF 2042 still have a long way to go, if they really want to fix the game as they are already doing. On the other hand, I also like the more "arcade-ish" feel on COD 2, and they definitely added a lot of things that I thought I would never seen in a COD game.
That's exactly why it is called as battlefield..
@@CJNG_1 Yep, but people are trying to say that COD is on the same level, which is not when it comes to "battlefield".
the water in bf2042 do be lookin like poweradeđ
4:16 why didnât you include the actual self heal animation with the syringe pistol or with the med pen?
I have them both and liked them both on my 3080i at Ultra settings - unreal details and immersion on both but that come with a prices- you will need a large larger HD
Wow thatâs cool. But when you hit walls with rocket nothing happens.. I think water physics are way over played.
GameBest recording a video in cod warzone*
The Teamates: "BRO WHAT ARE YOU DOING HELP US!"
The tire at 2042: yeah you think I burst? OK that's too stupid for me I'm out.
Cada uno tiene detalles pichudos y unicos es un echo que pueden mejorar cada uno. Battlefield 2042 no es el mejor Battlefield pero han sabido cuidar ciertos detallitos como el agua, la destruccion del suelo que no es UNA IMAGEN sino que es algo que cambia el suelo del mapa etc de cosas que se podrian mencionar :D
En todo caso ojala que BF2042 continue mejorando y ojala Infinity Ward pueda guiar este y el siguiente año MW2 de maravillas porque se nota que es el unico estudio que le mete amor.
Esa es la actitud đ
@BardoGYT Buena observacion
Battlefield always had INCREDIBLE sounds
Both Games had incredible sounds till 2019 when MW reboot came, It was far better from bf5 and also was better when bf2042 came. And now it already is. đ€·đđ
The weapon mode toggle sounds must have been bugged because my guns for sure have sound when I toggle fire modes
That's high tech bulletproof wheel! (Joking)
Water vs Bullet: BF2042
Water vs Grenade: MW2
Vehicle on Water: MW2
Climbing a Ladder: MW2
Shooting car tires: MW2
Glass physics: MW2
Swimming: MW2
Healing animation: MW2
Peeking: MW2
Tank: BF2042
Bullet tracks: MW2
Single mode and Auto mode: MW2
Smoke effect: MW2
Shoot through: MW2
Grenade crater: NEITHER
So in my opinion, If mw2 actually adds craters, and more smoke and effects on the environment when you fire a tank or a heavy firearm, it would easily beat the shit out of bf2042. So in conclusion, Mw2 takes the W.. i guess..
I personally found the smoke effect in BF2042 to be much more realistic and effective in gameplay, you could barely see anything and it actually look like real smoke, I have been in a house where it was covered with smoke due to a frying pan being left on the stove and burning, it looks just like that. Also Healing animation In BF2042 exists, this person just didn't use it correctly. Glass physics was a draw, they both looked fine to me anyway. Single and auto mode is again draw because one doesn't have sound and other doesn't have animation, so it's not really a debate. Grenade crater effects was still better in BF2042 for me personally, especially if you do it in dirt.
@@raionshishi8290 true enough, guero
In my opinion BF2042 wins water drops on vehicle, hand animation on doors and crater. Neither do well on car tires, both unrealistic. Feels like both BF and COD are not as good as I expected for next gen
And yet the CoD cannot make it so that when you drive a tank, you knock down fences and lampposts, but what happens instead you end up flipping the tank itself. TBH neither of the games are good and neither one of them is finished. COD campaign was one big buggy mess. I would not recommend anyone to buy either of the games at the current stage and price, its just pure waste of money. Or just buy the games try them out for under 2 h and refund them if you don't like them. That is of course if your are using Steam. Effects and details should be the least priority, as most important is stabilizing the game itself, which neither of them have done for their latest releases.
@@overlord5663 i mean if they fixed the bugs and put more physics into it than it already has, Then i'd be shitting my pants đ
5:40 Sleep peacefully
In the battlefield, hold the button that you use to hold the weapon in hand, so if it's down d pad to pull it out, then hold the down d pad
cod had good intentions making tires that can pop but that vehicle has bulletproof tires so theyâve managed to be less accurate on that front
BF will always have the best graphics and details in my opinion they also been so consistent in past BF games with graphics and details at least COD is stepping it up
Cod is more realistic
Oh fuck you said my opinion
Black Ops 1 Zombie map "Five" had better glass physics than both these games.
We need more zombieeeeessss
Holy shit I remember those physics they were insane.
True xd
lol
Didnât it only have like 10 windows and thatâs it? Yâall are over exaggerating
Water: Tie (MW2 for better looking fluid collision, BF2042 for things becoming wet)
Ladders: MW2
Car Tires: MW2 (but mag dumping to pop them is ridiculous)
Glass: MW2
Swimming: MW2
Healing: MW2
Peaking doors: MW2
Tanks: BF2042
Bullet tracks: MW2
Firing mode switch: MW2
Smoke grenades: BF2042
Shoot-through: MW2
Grenade craters: BF2042
Winner: MW2 with a score of 10 to 4
I have both of them, and played cod&bf for long time. It's fact small scale detail in weapons is actually good in cod, however, world details and rend physics are better in bf2042. Also, the sounds.. both of them are just good. Bf2042 just took well indoor gun sounds. AlSo.. obviously,, codmw2 gets sick so quickly. When I get sick of it, I play bf2042.
People are getting too excited about the water physics in mw2022, yes it does have excellent features, but the core water physics are still a little bit more rudimentary than battlefield v (bf2042 water physics are shit) but still pretty good for the first time, good job IW
True đâŁïž
Great unbiased video. I might actually buy MW2 now
If you hold the button, there is another healing animation in BF 2042. In 4:04
The best mw II detail is the sound system if you have headphones it's just mind blowing
Ojalå pudiéramos tener un juego con lo mejor de cada uno
Kya pto
speak
In Case Of Infinity Wards Water Physics The Water Movement Was Impressive
But The Water Splash Were A Bit Dull đBut In Terms Of The Waters Splash I Guess DICE Did a Better Job đ
No, Infinity Ward did better in everything, every detail. I never knew bf was that shit đčđčđčđđđ©đ©
Next time I go fishing in either game I'll have to confirm the satisfaction level. Not sure why this is such a big focus.
@@nassxt9031 cod fans getting mad
There is a mode switch sound. Its a high pitched glitch. You dont hear it when loud noises are happening
The best video game comparison I've ever seen in my fucking life, great video, you've convinced me, go for MW II.
You could have healed yourself with the syrette gun instead of just shooting the ground, that one was compared a little unfairly
Donât forget the med pen in 2042 exists also
So for the shooting the wall comparison for 2042 depending on what surface you shoot its give damage the surface.If you shoot a concrete wall it will have better particles an physics than call of duty.
Where the hell are the textures on some of the walls he was shooting at in BF 2042. Their engine is capable of much more. 2042 was a phone in for a game compared to previous games.
@@richr161 The wall is not made of concrete its a just a normal wall it was not added to be destroyed.
Csgo is the best lol
I've been a diehard battlefield fan since the begining and jumped in and out of various COD games over the years. I didn't even consider buying 2042 after playing the beta, not even when the price dropped. I was so disappointed and hoped they'd maybe make it playable by the time it came out free on Game Pass. Anyway, seeing this new COD I think I'm finally gonna switch sides, I like the bigger maps, vehicles and the whole look. It seems they've taken the good stuff from battlefield and shown them how it should have been done. I'll never understand how EA allowed this to turn into such a massive steaming turd of a franchise?
The answer to your question is in the question itselfâŠEA. But hey on the bright side theyâll be forced to respond, and considering how much fun Iâve been having on mw2 I canât wait to see what EA has up their sleeve.
There is no sides to switch to. Both games are totally different. CoD you run around in circles shooting guns. The other you're on a large scale battlefield with a million things happening. Also, no serious BF gamer dropped the franchise based on a stupid beta. MW2 beta was horrible. 2042's launch wasn't pretty but it didn't stop me for playing about 750 games so far and I had lots of fun. If you don't play the game how do you even know what it's like?
@@fulstaak no serious gamer dropped the franchise? đ€Ł
Do some research and you'll find that battlefield lost 2/3 of its fanbase and a petition was started was signed by over 200,000 players demanding their money back for this stinker. I gave up on the franchise because I'm fed up with the bullshit and being shafted by EA, the only idiots who are left playing it are the ones who enjoy a good shafting! Playing battlefield 1942 back in the day was a better experience!
@@bigmacdaddydaddymac I said no SERIOUS BF player dropped the franchise over a beta. Not talking about snowflakes who barely know what BF is. As a BF veteran I have never lost faith in the team, even in their darkest moments. And here we are with a very good version of this game.
@@fulstaak sugarcoat it as much as you want but the fact of the matter is the franchise has lost money and players, the game is a massive fail, even EA have had to admit that, it's shit!
The 2-Pam Chloride is đ„ top notch!
I like how others players sit on the tank's upper side,where it has sentry gun
Keep in mind that 2043 is like 3 or 4 times bigger than MWII. Developing matches and maps designed to have 128 persons at the same times is not an easy thing to do. Love the game, it has come a long way and DICE is finally redeeming it. If you havenât, give it a try.
nah it's trash, specialists made engineer useless, there are 5 weapons of each type only, no squad leader, no one gives out ammo, the only upgrades for a gun are 50 scopes you have and that's it. Also no destruction. Basically any bf before was 2x better at least
@@Yungkhalifa14 Damn pretty much every single thing you just said was wrong lmfao
It's still 128 players?
@@robbyr.a3424 It's got everything from 8v8 to 64v64 for a while now.
@@vindikaktus except good gunplay and battlefield feel but other than that its got everything lol
They both look great.
Question is how immersive are the sandbox maps comparisons?
The fire mode no switching sound at MWll has been fixed by now