WOAH! Baby Reindeer's Real Life Martha Starts Lawsuit Process AGAINST NETFLIX!?
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 06. 2024
- WOAH! Baby Reindeer's Real Life Martha Starts Lawsuit Process AGAINST NETFLIX!?
Thumbnail images are satire created by adobe photoshop and artificial intelligence artwork.
Excerpt from Deadline
‘Baby Reindeer’s Real-Life Martha Has Not Heard From Netflix As She Works With Senior UK Attorney To Build Lawsuit Against Streamer
EXCLUSIVE: Baby Reindeer‘s real-life Martha appears to be making good on her promise to sue Netflix, but has yet to hear from the streamer despite being identified against her wishes and claiming to have received death threats and unwanted attention.
Chris Daw KC, a barrister working with Fiona Harvey to build a lawsuit, told Deadline that Netflix had failed to contact her in any capacity after she was thrust into the media spotlight last month.
He said the series, which has amassed more than 65M views since premiering, raised serious questions about Netflix’s duty of care standards. He called for a “major review” of its compliance procedures.
Excerpt from Daily Record
Baby Reindeer's real life Martha demands £1m for Piers Morgan interview after £250 offer
Fiona Harvey is in a cash war with Piers Morgan after an explosive interview that has been viewed millions of times on his CZcams channel.
The real-life Martha from Baby Reindeer last night slammed the £250 offered by Piers Morgan’ s firm for her exclusive interview.
Fiona Harvey, 58, is fuming after her appearance on his CZcams Uncensored show made the host at least £250,000 already.
Excerpt from Business Insider
The woman outed as the alleged 'Baby Reindeer' stalker said she felt 'used' in Piers Morgan interview, where he asked her if she loves Richard Gadd
A woman who was outed by "Baby Reindeer" fans as the alleged stalker of the true crime drama's creator and lead actor said she felt "used" by Piers Morgan in an interview about the Netflix series.
"Baby Reindeer" tells a fictionalized version of creator Richard Gadd's experiences with stalking, and has become a worldwide phenomenon since its release in April. That month, an unnamed woman who was outed on social media as "the real Martha Scott" told the Daily Mail she was considering taking legal action against Gadd and Netflix for the harassment she has faced as a result of viewers trying to track her down.
On Wednesday, Morgan revealed he had interviewed Fiona Harvey, believed to be the woman first interviewed by the Daily Mail. The interview will be released Thursday at 3pm ET on Morgan's CZcams channel, Piers Morgan Uncensored.
Excerpt from The Independent
Real-life Martha Scott from Baby Reindeer sits down for tell-all Piers Morgan interview
The show has already sparked a backlash among viewers
The woman who allegedly inspired Richard Gadd’s hit Netflix series Baby Reindeer will give her first TV interview this Thursday (9 May).
In the series, comedian Richard Gadd plays a fictionalised version of himself who gets stalked by a lonely and mentally ill woman called Martha, whom he meets while working at a pub.
Following the series’ success curious fans have tried to discover the inspirations behind the show, which members of the cast have vehemently discouraged.
Scottish lawyer Fiona Harvey, 58, who has been labelled the ‘real Martha’ has received death threats from Baby Reindeer viewers and will speak on Piers Morgan Uncensored to “set the record straight after being unmasked by fans”.
Excerpt from The Sun
‘STALKER’ UNMASKED ‘I’m very attractive and I’m a lawyer’, says ‘real Baby Reindeer stalker’ Fiona Harvey as she threatens Netflix
THE WOMAN thought to be the real-life stalker from Netflix smash Baby Reindeer is threatening to sue Netflix.
The gritty real-life drama was inspired by the ordeal suffered by Scots creator and leading man Richard Gadd, 34.
The harrowing tale follows barman Donny Dunn as his life falls apart at the hands of an obsessive stalker
S U P P O R T T H I S C H A N N E L:
Subscribe, Donate, & Follow Us Here: linktr.ee/AndySignore
And JOIN Our Community to become a Popcorned Planeteer, to really become a part of the team for Perks, Members Only Live Shows and EXCLUSIVE Videos & Replays: • Members-only videos
Popcorned Planet offers commentary on the biggest Celebrity News, Pop Culture Outrage and Viral Internet Stories from TikTok, Twitter, Instagram and beyond. Created and hosted by Andy Signore (creator of ScreenJunkies, Honest Trailers, MovieFights, Movie World and more). Popcorned Planet is your one stop place Daily News, Celebrity Drama, Hollywood insight and Pop Culture Commentary.
C O N T A C T / B U S I N E S S : PopcornedPlanetTeam@gmail.com
Or Send Packages, Toys & Fan Mail To:
Andy Signore
16350 Bruce B Downs Blvd
PO Box # 48742
Tampa FL, 33647
#babyreindeer #piersmorgan #richardgadd #martha #netflix #netflixseries #stalking #stalker #stalkeronline #johnnydepp #celebritynews #celebrity #news #celebritygossip #gossip
SHE IS NOT A VICTIM
Right! SHE revealed herself to be an outright liar to the world. She lied sooo many times in the piers Morgan interview. How does it make sense to sue somebody about a movie saying it wasn't you and the only person saying it was YOU is YOU while giving evidence against YOURSELF that you emailed him, sent a letter and called him yet you didn't have his number and only left one vmail. Say What lady? 🤣🤣
Possibly. Although everything is speculation at the moment. Innocent until proven guilty. No?
Richard gadd says she is a victim too
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Thank you! She stopped being a victim when SHE decided to claim herself as Martha. If she was getting threats from the public. She needs to sue the public lol
If she was a victim, she would have gone to the police and contacted Netflix behind the scenes with the evidence she’s being harassed.
BUT NO
She decided to go to known publications, go on an interview with Piers Morgan (who exploited her more than any show or Gadd did. Argue with yourselves in the comments lol) and SHE said it WASN’T HER!… What is the lawsuit?! 🧐
She wanted attention. She’s got it. I hope she gets the help she so desperately needs as does Richard. He’s entitled to tell HIS story!
I don't feel sorry for Fiona, even if Netflix & Richard Gadd haven't done the right thing. The reason I say this is because she lies in her interviews. One minute she says that she never had a reindeer toy, like never ever ever, and then later on she says that she did have a reindeer toy. Which one is is, because both statements can't be true. Its the same with saying she never emailed him and didn't have his email address and never sent him letters and never had his real address, but later trips herself up and admits she did have both his email & real address. So I don't think her lawsuit will go anywhere, and I think she is just trying to profit off her crime.
What interview was this revealed in? Do you have time stamps?
She sent him a letter but it was to the theatre, I’ve not heard about the rest you mentioned. I thought the only interview she did was with Piers Morgan.
@@emilyashley4820 The one with Pierce Morgan. You need watch the whole interview, nobody can timestamp you 250 places.
Sorry Steph. Right to privacy???? She infringe on that right for his victim. If all of it is true, it’s NOT diffamation.
"defamation ..
I am confused why so many people believe her just because she denied everything. Why would she ever admit to doing all these things? Of course she denies it. I don’t believe a word she says but it will be interesting to keep following this.
Simple answer, most ppl are not too bright. Many act as if they really have a gapping hole in their heads!
On the other hand , I’m wondering why people believe him when he admits he embellished a lot of things, and has provided no evidence . One other thought I had is could all this be an elaborate way of drawing attention to the show? Some kind of publicity stunt? Yes I could be jaded lol
I mean you generally need evidence. Where is it?
No one believes her - Steph is just over dramatising for the audience 🙄
Not to mention every video about the interview has all of CZcams calling “liar, liar, pants on fire”.
She’s getting death threats? Hmm. I wouldn’t do that to anyone but she is getting a taste of her own medicine of sending relentless messages to people who don’t want her to.
So she says ?
Also her name is Fiona Muir before she did the name change and there is evidence to suggest that she is a convicted stalker.
Do you have a source for this?
All of the newspaper articles about her 5 year harrassmemt campaign against a scottish couple. @VengieShiva January 2000
She was never convicted of any criminal charge. She got a civil sort of cease and desist warning. Nothing to do with anything criminal.
@@rachelletten2342 Ty, I have checked over the articles and may have missed it but I couldn't see anything to suggest that she is a convicted stalker. Is this lady a stalker? I would say yes she is but is she a convicted one then I'd have to say no unless more evidence comes to light
Based upon what I have read or seen so far I do believe that Netflix in this instance have overstepped the mark and this wouldn't be the first time that Netflix states something is true and it turns out that it isn't. Considering we pay a fee to Netflix for content, we have the right to legitimate content where there is a claim that it's fact
@@ElliotFlowersso what? Many stalkers are given slaps on the wrist. Nothing is done about stalking until someone is unalived. Literally had a guy hiding in the bushes… cops said verbatim “what have you done to make him act this way”
How is this serious? Netflix has a disclaimer in the credits of every episode. They changed her name and have never admitted that the character was based on Fiona.
My thought exactly - only herself and some curious viewers ID’d her - I watched the show, had no interest in who she was and didn’t read any info about her ID - then I saw her on Piers 🥜 🥜 🥜
The actress that portrayed her was bang on! Had she not identified herself, no one could actually accuse her. She opened her mouth and started talking, that's what will sell the movie more!
We don't know, but if she was still stalking him, getting a Netflix deal might be his final attempt at getting rid of her⁉️⁉️⁉️ 😊
1) No one knew who the real life Martha was until Fiona admitted she was. 2) This lawsuit could be seen as her victimizing Gadd once again. 3) This lawsuit is coming off as a cash grab attempt on her part since she never once went after Gadd or anyone else when he was doing his one man shows & depicting "Martha". She saw that Netflix picked it up & probably thought she could easily get a couple million out of them
1. That's not true at all. I was curious on who it was and looked on Reddit and they'd already found her Twitter account almost instantly. 2. There is no way she can disprove Richard if she actually did it. It's all going to come out. Does she have an actual criminal record. VERY easy to find out.
She"s a stalker end of story!!! She has not got a leg to standd on!!! Do not make her a victim she is a criminal!!
Agree 💯 %
You need to see her inane ramblings on social media - including that Gadd has AIDS! If she's currently building a case - she needs to stop with the defamatory comments
Richard Gadd or Netflix did not out her, she did. And she hasn't proven that she is even Martha. She's just looking for attention and money.
She could have denied it was her. She could have stayed quiet. But not only did she out herself, she’s apparently tried to do a meet and greet. My take, she just wants money.
With the disclaimer at the end of the end credits, I believe she won’t have a case for defamation.
I agree about defame (this video is just baiting). Apparently the meet and greet is a common promo approach by that pub so don’t think it was genuine in any other way
She said it wasn't about her, she's not a victim! She posting all sorts of crap on her social media she's put on one 4 or 6 emails I've more watch put ill show you Richard gadd with a kiss at the end she's deluded
Laura Wray has said a restraining order was granted against her in 2002.
There is no way she will sue Netflix. She'll be torn to shreds.
Easy fit, Netflix should make a limited series about her side of the story / how she recall the events . Offer her money for the series … a very good deal for Netflix and Fiona
Good idea!
😂 wouldn't work. Look at her track record. She can't work with others. She will muck up production with her outbursts and waste time and money
We know people will tune in - I hope she does act her as herself though
@@ElanaVital83well that would make brilliant tv that everyone wants to watch.. her tripping up with her lies and having tantrums
Agree
Martha will have to provide all of her electronic devices to prove that she was not the stalker and sending 40,000 emails to her stalking victim. the Netflix Series???? also what if she does have a criminal record???? I think Martha is in for a lot of scrutiny as this moves forward.
I need to say, if this was a series made the other way around and the entire thing was based around a woman's story and how she was stalked by a man, absolutely no one would be losing their stuff, sticking up for her and constantly questioning richard gadd and accusing him. Yes it's shocking the way her identity was really not hidden, an idiot could have found her but as I said no one would talk positively or respectfully of the man if it were the other way around. That's one of the massive problems in our society nothing is ever truly balanced
She is unsettling. It will be interesting if she does have a case though.
She came forward saying she was Martha. If she stayed quiet nobody would know. She saw an opportunity to get money. This is pure greed. By her coming forward, she recognized herself in the character, “ergo” GUILTY!!!
Still if she got death threats (which I doubt) she is still a human being. She still have rights. She won’t get 1M£ from Netflix because either way Netflix didn’t point her as Martha Scott. And because she lies and conter her own words. But she still have rights. We saw it with Amber Heard. She got a case and her lies were proven. It’s not up to us to decide if she’s indeed lying. There has to be a case to legally claim that she is in fact lying. We’re not Batman neither Captain America or whatever hero to do Justice with our hands. There has to be a case to prove her lies.
The Sun newspaper had tracked her down in about 30 minutes. She had no choice but to speak up.
@@ElliotFlowers She could deny everything, tell them to speak to her solicitors, or remain silent. She had many choices.
@@siriusnst She did, she denied everything.
@@ElliotFlowers She denied everything but also confirmed she was the real-life Martha. She could have said “that’s not me at all, that was based on someone else” and left it at that. I doubt anyone would have continued harassing her.
This crazy person between piers and now Netflix rhis phyco has found her next targets
That barrister better watch out because if he loses she'll be onto him.
I don't think Netflix are that stupid to do this show and not have proof that this is a real "true story". Can't wait for them to pull out the big guns!
He’s not just a barrister, he’s a Kings Council (KC)
As,we say here in Scotland...the lassie is aff her heed
It's "heid", just like "deid".
My theory is that Richard Gadd must have a mountain of evidence against her - if so, that would explain why Netflix was confident in deeming the series to be a "true story." If he kept and catalogued ALL of that evidence as his character Donny did in the TV show, it will come up in court. I'll be munching on my popcorn as I follow the developments in the court case. 🍿
She's a lawyer, represent yourself lady!
Can't wait to see this go to trial! I want to see all of the emails, texts, letters that she made. It will be amazing when it all comes out.
It will be mind blowing but if all those voice mails emails and letters exist what are the chances of her starting a law suit
@@fozzydare7987 Yeah its true but I don't think even her own lawyers will be able to get her to speak the truth. She is most likely roping them all into this mess LOL.
@@chriswiens9706 She's deluded and probably thinks she's telling the truth. That lawyer will probably start to see through her lies, but will feel obliged to follow through.
@@nutcracker2916 What's crazy is that no one is talking the man who raped and drugged Richard Gadd. Surely he should stand trial as well. I've heard his name is Sam Bain but its only speculation
Fiona is learning the meaning of karma😅
Yes, people need to be held accountable (by the law) and not Netflix! Netflixs should be worried. They are not the judge and jury
It's hard for me to listen to this girl. Sorry, I'll wait for Andy.
Same! & Arrogance 😮
I thought was the only one😮
Awe I love steph, and Kim too. They have been around helping Andy for ages
@@javanjunkindahouse6625 Kim is Classy, informed levelled headed 👍🏽🏆📺
Why did the government need to ask Netflix about this?
As always, they must waste time and money on nonsense.
As a lawyer, she will need a DBS. That will disclose if she has a criminal record.
Hope 'Netflix' are made to pay.
This lady will love the attention! If anything Netflix gave her the attention she longed for
Isn't it strange how nobody can find out who the music producer is??
Would love to see Fiona on Big Brother UK. I'd watch that.
I have to add one thing I didn't hear discussed... I have a stalker and the one thing the police told me was since all the proof was on the net or text messages I couldn't charge the person who I knew was doing it because he could claim someone else did it or 'phone was stolen' maybe that's why she hasn't been In trouble for what she's done... Not saying she's innocent or even Netflix they indeed are in some hot water...and she's... Just WOW..
Police are fobbing you off, that’s nonsense
This is just another example of the many protections for the perpetrator and not the victim. Her being found out I s possibly the worst thing that could have happened. It all just emphasizes what side the law and really society on the whole is on. I’m 60 and I have never heard of a show being held to standard of a documentary. I feel for Richard Gadd because he likely wrote his performances as a way to heal, and a way to also help other victims in showing they’re not alone. But I’m seeing catharsis is dangerous. We have to ensure that we protect the person who hurt us. It’s a difficult thing to realize and I pray that this isn’t a ploy to pull him back in. It’s offensive to every person who has been through this type of thing.
Singapore has alot of this, mostly hospitality school, diploma and advance diploma courses. They have a physical school and u have to go to school at least 3x a week 2hrs a day. And what will u for the rest of the day and night!? Work. They crack down most of them but theres always newly open under slightly diffrent disguise
A drama CONVENTION is to add 'true story' when starting a show. Netflix is covered because they have a disclaimer at the end - 'based on a true story'.
FARGO, 1996 movie by the Coen brothers. In the first frames, white text over black backdrop:
“This is a true story. The events depicted in this film took place in Minnesota in 1987. At the request of the survivors, the names have been changed. Out of respect for the dead, the rest has been told exactly as it occurred"
The movie is not true! The Coen brothers have stated in many interviews that it is not true, they wanted to set a specific tone - however there are some scenes with the wood chipper that actually true.They added they based their script on an actual criminal event, but wrote a fictional story around it.
Richard Gadd had every right to write his story from his trauma ... he never said it was a Documentary.
Fiona would have to prove she is the character by revealing all the abusuve things she's done - which she's not been clear about. Then she'd have to prove, as the stalking abuser of Richard, she is now the victim wanting anonymity by outing herself.
Im pretty sure this will all be shut down asap!! There is no way Netflix would go to all the trouble of filming this without doing their homework 🙄🤷🏻♂️ ffs 😂😂😂
Was the rest of this stream deleted? It was over an hour long
Just because she's embarrassed about her actions in the past doesn't make her a victim.
She has no case because there is a disclaimer in the end credits that say certain events have been fictionalized for dramatic purposes.
Eat fresh ginger and drink ginger tea. Also, if you eat Sushi the wasabi does wonders for clearing up throat and sinus problems.
It’s Netflix. You know they covered their butts legally. They aren’t new to this.
Netflix said it was a true story, not even based on a true story!!
It’s on the disclaimer small print
@@jaymuller1369 While true story is in large letters on all the promotional posters and clips.
I just don't see other than the fact that UK may have different laws and precedents as to how this would be a possible Victorious case. I also wonder if she manages to win this what type of precedent will that set for any platform that has already platforms other people's lives without their permission or their consideration! There are a lot of actual documentaries, not seriously based on a true story, that are on these platforms that are about people's lives and these people not only did not give their consent but they weren't even contacted! Could this possibly open the door for future litigation? I also can't even imagine how bad the poor guy in the series must feel. Especially if everything happens the way that it's depicted in the series. I just can't even imagine the pain he must be going through not only because of what happens that we do know about and don't know about, but to sit back and see that people are rallying around her to support her lawsuit against Netflix based on her feelings and defamation! I just couldn't imagine having something like that happened to me and then people try to protect the person that did this to me! I just can't even imagine the type of pain he must be feeling! Or the rage
She is stalking Netflix
Tbh, ive never known there to be any protection of anonymity if theres been a criminal conviction so if she has been convicted as claimed then she probably doesnt have a leg to stand on.
Pierce Morgan and Netflix gained a real stalker now. Plus, she said she has a lawyer boyfriend...but, does he know that he got a girlfriend ?
Stalkers get what they get. They don't respect your boundaries, why should we care when they get theirs crossed when they are publicly called out?
I was watching a video about this on CZcams where some experts say that in the beginning of the series it says its a real story but in the end of the series netflix says it's based on real life events. Would that make a difference? No one really watches the end credits. Has anyone noticed this in the end credits?? They also mentioned that Richard Gadd has said himself that the series have been tweaked here and there. And thought that he was talking about the convictions
I enjoy the content on this channel a lot. It’s ok to go on a hiatus if Andy is away. 😊 I love Steph but this is not a good substitute.
So if it says a true story. They do that all the time. The characters name is not true. You gotta change things. But if it’s not the real name in a true story, does that mean it’s not a true story? Come on. Fiona is a crazy stalker no matter what little details are not true. His main story of things he went through is obviously pretty close to the truth. She has no case.
Well if what was alleged in the series is true she has alot to explain. Well weren't her social media accounts public? If you put things on a public platforms becareful what you write. However I do agree that maybe her identity has been identifiable, yet maybe Netflix believe they did their best and followed rules and without intent. This will be an interesting case to watch.
Agree
Yall take a little too long to get to the topic. People get bored and move on quickly. Love your channel, just making an observation ❤
How could Richard Gadd set her up by voice recording her 300 or more times as voice messages apparently sent to him? Then she said she had only met him 5-6 times. She contradicted herself so many times on her Piers Morgan interview. She is not the victim here.
But did he show the voice messages?
@jimmyhyun8546 he hasn't yet but I'm sure he will have to when it goes to court. She didn't deny him having 300 messages she said he'd probably recorded her on a dicta phone. No denials of him having that many just excuses of why he may have. Still how could he have recorded her that many times when she said she'd only met him 5-6. Doesn't ring true to me at all.
A lawyer did state she has a good case because Netflix states its a true story, rather than based on a true story but fictionalised
They state it's a True Story but locations dialogue (and in particular) INCIDENTS have been Fictionalized for dramatic purposes. Basically this really happened to him but certain events were Fictionalized.
Have you read the end credits?
So what? The Fargo TV series also starts every episode stating "This is a true story" even though it obviously isn't. As long as Netflix put a legal disclaimer in the credits (which they did) there is no case.
@tracy3418 yes I did and the disclaimer is there. "The program is based on real events however: certain characters, names, incidents, dialogue and locations have been Fictionalized for dramatic purposes. Ass covered I believe
Not the end credits it doesn't. There's a disclaimer.
The lawsuit should be streamed on Netflix
If she was never arrested and found guilty is the issue tho right?
has anyone tried sourcing the information through the freedom of information act? as its now become public interest??
Netflix could take a few mil of Megan’s Netflix deal and donated it to Martha 😂
Netflix aren’t in trouble! She doesn’t have a law degree and is a convicted stalker, do your due diligence.
Is that disclaimer at the end after Netflix auto plays the next episode? Because I never saw a disclaimer
Her going cahoots with Netflix as a settlement.. well that would make brilliant tv that everyone wants to watch.. her tripping up with her lies and having tantrums
Wouldn't Fiona have to prove she is the stalker first though?
If it was a man who was the stalker we would not be having this conversation. He would not have been given a platform to air his side and the thought that the victim should have protected his identity would have been ludicrous. I really hope Richard Gadd has his ducks in a row so we can stop this nonsense.
As stated the other night, Netflix most certainly had a team of lawyers review it. It is probably more of an annoyance.
I don’t think it’s “unwanted attention”.
On with the show, please!
Very shallow guest. She added
What Netflix should have done is get the real life Martha onboard from the outset. It does seem sneaky on Netflix part to go head and make the show without the real life Martha's approval.
You can’t be serious? You think she would’ve participated?
@@ROYAL12366 probably not, hence my comment ;)
Starts at 56:30
Non sense saved my day
Netflix ain't stupid they'd of covered themselves massively plus if gadd got evidence of her stalking which I'm sure he as then she's made it worse for herself. Netflix are too quiet they've something up their sleeve.
People have a right NOT TO BE STALKED
For sure. It's the most terrifying feeling..turns ones whole life in to something of an alternate universe. I lived through nearly three yrs of it.. So terrible i still have gaps in my memory from that time due to the stress/trauma. Worst of all, as police would not take me seriously in any way, i went to a psychologist because i HAD to speak to someone..and what do you know, next i was diagnosed ( after ONE visit) with some sort of paranoia syndrome..
Seriously, being a victim of crap so undeserved and people not believing you is enough to drive anyone around the bend.
@Stephthealternerd, as I said earlier, he outed her. Yes, a different innuendo for the curtains could have been used. He used her body and personality, tweets ECT. Everything but her real name. He made her exactly like the character. She may be crazy but smart enough to know she might have a case
Not if he's sitting on all those emails and voice messages.
This women will be thriving in the attention. A moment in life that she can play the biggest catfish in the courts.
At the end in the credits it has the disclaimer
She will not sue. She was just talking out her butt. She has no case everything. He said was at least around about the truth feeling sorry for her and really get unbelievable talk about her privacy stuff. You are off the fucking mark their
In all honesty, good for her. Not that I belive her or think she would win (or deserve to win) but because I think its important that in the public eye its shown that Netflix isn't taking the care they need.
There is no difference between what netflix did to her and what they did with Andy. They are so quick to churn out something they don't take a step back to consider if they should or if its legal.
No they didn’t name her she named herself
The man has said, multiple times and it’s documented- that the story was elaborated or exaggerated for affect….. it has been stated that and it’s obvious some of it isn’t true but this woman is focused solely on what she DIDNT do and not all the sick crap- like lady sit down already bc just bc you are just less of a toxic psychotic stalker than portrayed doesn’t make it better. It’s ironic as hell that she isn’t liking how she is being harassed over all this. ISNT THAT CRAZY to consider. Martha needs to get over herself
So fiona says she taking netflix to court as they haven't been in touch, She wants Money thats all, She is also hoping it will make richard suffer more by doing this, Fiona wasn't bothered when richard was doing this story in a play, Fiona went public herself by her own choice
C'mon. We all know she never will do it, right? And if she does, she won't get anywhere. The first woman who accused her says she keeps the evidence, and I doubt she is lying.
She’s seen the piers Morgan debate with you on the panel and she’s calling all of you out on her Facebook 😅 she’s going to sue the panel too 🤣
I personally have a very interesting story to tell
I haven’t put it out there because of how it.could backfire
The people who I’d expose would narcissistically assert that I’m lying
If she was a he it would be a very different discussion. She has the opportunity to clear her name but has not produced any evidence yet. If she did everything she's depicted of she's a danger in society. Both men and women need to be held accountable for thier actions. We need more rehabilitation for offenders mentally unwell.
It’s not that serious. It’s pretty accurate. All the evidence is on her old Facebook page there’s like three of them
Breaking news 💥 real life stalker doesn't like being stalked
I'd go through the court process and then base season 2 off that! Lol
100%. This is like part two of the series watched in real time in micro episodes spread throughout social media!
I can't wait to see the evidence. Should be very interesting!
I feel like after Andy was casted on Piers Morgan show, Popcorn Planet is siding with Fiona Harvey because Piers is on her side!😪🤦🏻♀️
She's gonna be in huge trouble in my opinion 😅
Doesn't it say in the credits that details were changed and some were fabricated? Doesn't that cover Netflix? Harvey is an outright liar, she tripped herself up constantly and SHE outed herself and now she's not happy.
regardless of what else she has done, if she hasn't gone to jain then netflix 100% screwed up.
where is the popcorn!
Nah. She doesn't have to have a criminal record for Gadd to sensationalise a television series. It's not a documentary but an artistic licensed retelling.
@@ElanaVital83 see, if they had said "based on real events" then they could get away with it. But because they said its all ready they have set themselves up to fail.
She is the one who should be sued as she was the stalker+ she needs to be careful as table will turn on her. She just didn't do it to one person there is another person that has come out and said she stalked them as well.
Just watched Piers Morgan's latest video; he wants Andy back on! woohoo!
Obviously she intends Netflix to settle rather than go to trial and set precedent with a ruling. Her attorney will get a nice fee and she will have enough for a nice retirement fund. I think Netflix didn't do errors and omissions. The show would have insurance if that happened - industry standard. She has a right to personal privacy. Expect settlement with NDA.
I can't wait to find out the legal history. Body language shows deception when the charges come up as though she wanted to clarify something but couldn't without making an admission but I'll bet something happened but charges were dropped or something like that knowing he was on and off about reporting to the police properly.
Yes! The 'finger raise' & mouth open as though she were about to say something.
She outed herself multiple times throughout the interview as a liar 🤣
If you post on public forums, you have pre exposed yourself.
They could’ve altered her appearance. They could’ve made her just a complete plain Jane. No. I guess Netflix thinks fat is funny.