Karen Read Innocent Of Murder? Reviewing Jackson's Latest Motion (Also, Monday!)
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 07. 2024
- Patreon: / runkleofthebailey
Locals: runkleofthebailey.locals.com/
BTC address: bc1qdqzpz6ny6w35qyl2rnasshjm60jvwcjgllwcay
All comments for information only. Do not take anything as legal advice--if you have a legal issue, contact a lawyer directly so that you can received advice tailored to your situation. All views expressed are solely those of the creator.
This makes me mistrusted the judge even more. Seems like she wanted to cause jury confusion.
This is her 2nd mistrial in a high profile case. Begs a few questions.
No that was Jackson.
@@stevenprice6957you can watch video of him arguing against the verdict slips. What is your goal with this lie?
@@stevenprice6957LOL sure Jan
@@Elleffeis that you tadpole. ?
The simple bottom line is if Bev did her job and ASKED them if they were hung on ALL the charges or just some of them, this would have been avoided. She didn’t do her job. She was blinded by biased and her “I was tired” 😂
Bev was a digrace to the profession. Biased, personalizing her tiredness, favouring lally, allowing lally 56 useless irrelevant incompetent lying witnessess to put the jury jnto a tired stupor, and she CONFUSED THE JURY WITH CONFUSING INSTRUCTIONS AND CONFUSING JUROR PAPERS.
Bev caused the mistrial.
It didn't matter because even for manslaughter it has to be anonymous
I love the idea of pro bono work for people unable to qualify for gov aid but still unable to afford private lawyers. I grew up really poor and many things were harder as we began to earn more money as we no longer qualified for help despite still needing it.
Exactly. It's so hard to be just above poverty because there's no more assistance and that loss is more than the gain.
The people saying that the defense team should've asked to poll the jury on the charges, as far as I'm aware, the judge should've done that as part of her job before declaring the mistrial.
That’s not how it works.
@@stevenprice6957she can’t pill them no but she was suppose to ask them if they were hung on ALL the charges or some. That’s where she failed
@@stevenprice6957you keep commenting on things you know nothing about such as the US judicial system
.......why????😂😂 Being that you're Australian judicial system is completely different.....🤔
The Judge "may" poll the Jury but it is not required. Should be a "shall"!
The judge’s job is to protect the record and I’m not so sure she did that here. Even if that were to only confirm that they were hung on all charges. Had she done that, there would be no question about the result.
The jury was so confused. They couldn’t even tell Brian Albert from Brian Higgins it seems. Between Lally’s endless word salad and bev’s lengthy and confusing instructions, not to mention no transcripts were provided, is it any wonder they were confused?
They were bombarded with 58 witnesses and remember we’ve heard their names hundreds if not thousands of times they didn’t.
Call backs of testimony are not allowed in MA
It wasn’t necessarily the juror who confused the two men. Remember this is an account by someone (informant) who was told by and intermediary what the juror said.
So the mistake could be by the intermediary or even the informant
@@RenataKleinRK perhaps in mass. But in Florida if any juror requests to have a transcript of trial testimony, the court must inform the jury that transcripts are not available but that they can request a readback or playback of testimony, which request may or may not be granted at the court's discretion.
@@annm9589 from what I’ve seen on lawtube, lots of things are done differently in MA. The jury just seemed really confused, and the judge seemed like the whole case was an inconvenience to her (“get this over with” “I’m tired” etc.). Anyway, my main point is that since transcripts are not provided, it seems Lally’s method is to inundate the jury with words and names and dial tone droning on and on so that information gets lost and leaves the jury confused. I’m sure this isn’t the first time he’s used this technique. Not a very skilled ADA in my opinion. Just a recipe for disaster.
I just want to say. Emily and Runkle are my law parents and I will always watch both of them.
Runkle, for the pro-bono fund. Thanks for being a wonderful human and spending time with us.
Now that the other jurors saw this filing today, more will come out now to confirm what happened. .
Hopefully yes, but realistically it really depends on the jurors in question, whether they're even aware of the filing, and whether they interpret this as "we'll be contacted if it's appropriate anyway" or as a "we better be heard, so to avoid it being dismissed I'll contact them to see if it'd help".
They might not appreciate their private conversations being passed on!
The judge instructed the jury NOT to complete the verdict form until they were in agreement on ALL the charges.
Yep, Bev didn't tell them that they could return a split verdict.
Was that during the initial jury charge? I would like to go back and watch that!
@Rae777 yes it was. I went back to rewatch
Seemed like Bev used an odd template for this combination of charges. And she defiantly said to vote not guilty they don’t check anything except the first box on a separate page.
Is that legal?
I support you doing pro bono for people in the gap!!! Then again, I support all of your endeavors, you’re a good human.
Replay crew! Working an overnight, in a lab by myself, and you’re keeping me company!
Hi , keep safe & awake 😅
What you working on, what lab? Sounds interesting
I guess I’m on the reply crew too! I’m so interested in this case
Same!!
Also replay crew I'm digging holes.
With Proctor now suspended without pay based on his actions during the investigation of this case, I really can't imagine what the cross examination in a retrial would look like.
It is possible the jury believe she didn't hit him with her SUV, but they would like to convict her on driving intoxicated, a reckless behaviour that can be a danger to anyone.
What I'm hearing is that they wanted to punish her for a hypothetical crime that didn't happen. That's not the way it's supposed to work.
It's possible that they thought they had to convict on at least ONE of the charges. 🙄
Hey Runkle 👋 I can't sleep so I am listening to replay thanks for keeping me company
Ian does have a soothing voice and keeps an even volume level, replays are perfect for before/during bed relaxation.
Replay crew! I am so touched by your passion for pro bono law work. I will be watching the Rust trial with you! ☺️
Love Getting Runkle 🎉🎉Full time CZcams ❤❤Let's Support Him Well so he gets A Good Idea That We Will & Can Support Mrs. Runkle, Pupps & Runkle himself Love for Runkle Family 🎉🎉
Reply crew! Just got done watching Emily.
Really hope that Trooper Bukenik and Trooper Tully face some action too. Proctor is not the only corrupt cop. They saw what he was doing and saying and said NOTHING.
That's the best case scenario. Worse, though perhaps not worst, is if he learned it from them.
💯
What about Trooper Paul? So incompetent!😢
We need to get "all four" (IYKYK)
Higgins has some real accountability as well!
Bless you Runkle, for your goal of probono work.❤
The way this case was handled should worry every American.
I so agree with you about the Monarchy. We really don't need it.
Here on replay crew. Couldn’t miss your opinions on this crazy trial.
Hey Runkle, Australian Solicitor living in Australia here who passed the NY bar exam in Feb, reach out if you need any learnings on how to make it work from a foreigner taking the bar
Congrats on passing the NY bar!
Congratulations 🎉🎉
@@mostlyvoid.partiallystars Thanks, the test is hard enough and then dealing with the bureauroracy is also a significant challenge.
Congratulations!!🎉
@@Terabell I can’t literally even imagine. My sis is a lawyer down here in Alabama and I saw how much work she put in - I admire your perseverance in getting it done though! And especially that you’re reaching out to help others through the same process, that’s super thoughtful of you!
I really hope the anti-Karen Read people who were spreading fake news about the verdict take a long look in the mirror and have a come to Jesus moment. You have to be a really shitty person to be that wrong, but also talk crap to everyone who disagrees with you. It's insane. They should have their heads evaluated
I'm in the CW didn't prove its case, but let's not pretend that there aren't also free KR people harassing online as well.
Just think - those irrational nitwits are convicting innocent people every day across the country.
Who saw the jury slip? Did they mark nothing on it? How do we know? Isn't it the responsibility of the hand-picked jury foreman to fill it out?
Do we know if she even accepted the jury slip? Or instructed the jury that they must complete any portions that they were able to? Or did she just look at the note which mentioned they were hung, assume that they were hung on all counts (*giving her the benefit of the doubt vs. knowing otherwise), not even ask a single question about that nor allow either side to do so, and dismiss them? I don't know what happened but I did expect that after a few centuries of experience with our jury system, she ought to have known how to conduct it in such a manner that no after-the-fact ambiguity was possible.
Didn't this happen during Depp Heard trial ? As in not filled out correctly, and the judge explained it and sent them back?
@@denisedavis371I think they didn't fill out the amounts for damages in that one.
@@brucedklein I don't believe that there's any confirmation whether they filled it out and I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't want to touch it until their decision was final across the board. But I also think that the jury didn't know that it was an option to acquit on some charges, as their notes to the court didn't indicate that they were only hung up on one. In hindsight, I think it would have been a good idea for the judge to ask that the second time, or the jury could have said 'we are ready and able to deliver a partial verdict.' It's tricky either way I think but it could be avoided if it were addressed in the freakin jury instructions.
@@nora__Their notes said deadlocked on charges, plural, multiple times.
So what I'm trying to figure out is how they're deadlocked on two or more charges while also acquitting her on two charges when she's only charged with three crimes.
It literally doesn't add up.
You explaining your goals for this channel (ie being able to defend clients pro bono) has definitely cemented my decision to prioritize watching you for trial coverage going forwards
John's shirt had blood running ALL down the front of it - you know, like when you get a bloody nose from being punched? If he was "knocked down" by the SUV, how did blood run down the front of his entire shirt???
& on the tops of his shoes!!
This is so important!
Yes! There's so much evidence that he couldn't have been hit by a car. It's disgusting that people still think she could have done it. Half the jury still thought she did involuntary manslaughter 😢. Fing scary!
@@mellie4174 Our jury system is completely wrecked now. Half the country is insane. Half of us have come so far, and the other half have plummeted backwards - they've lost the ability to reason, to change their minds, to identify their own biases, to consider alternate perspectives, and to truly empathize with others. I wouldn't want any of those ppl on a jury for myself or anyone I cared about!
That group text the McAlberts had, keeping tabs on everything Kerry Roberts said to police, what the police were doing, and "Tell them _the guy_ never came in the house!" ...ALL of that is 100% consciousness of guilt and shady AF - HOW does any juror shrug that off?!?! It's complete insanity. It's more convincing to me that Karen is innocent than the effing science even is.
58:12 "world's most expensive trailer park" BAHAHAHAHA OMG 🤣 I just alarmed my office lizard!!!
What's the point of a jury in Canada if the prosecution can keep so easily and repeatedly try again after an acquittal?
In Ireland the protection from double jeopardy re conviction and also sentence has been taken away. It wasn't ever in our constitution and so yet another right was just removed for political expediency. That said the sentences in Ireland are much less draconian than US ones. Also prisoners have fewer rights removed, for example the right to vote.
@@RenataKleinRKSummary, we don't let the judge or defendant ruin trials and get away with it essentially.
@@eammbutler1323 I just want to point out we never had double jeopardy as a right here. Really it wasn't until 2008 that we had an SC ruling on how many times a case could be retried.
However, if a finding of not guilty is put forward by a jury, it cannot be appealed by the DPP - in a deadlock / no verdict a second trial can be heard.
Sentencing has always been appealable by both sides. Double jeopardy applies only to a conviction and not to a sentence - and in Ireland it hasn't ever really applied at all outside of some offence specific statutes (eg criminal law (secual offences) acts.)
As of now, we don't know whether the "NG" was checked off on any forms or not.
Jackson asked for there to be both "G" & "Ng" boxes next to each charge & each lesser included - which Bev denied. Ultimately, the forms weren't clear, and neither was the jury note. Otherwise, this wouldn't be happening now.
Bev should've asked which counts they were hung on, for clarity, rather than assuming it was all of them. Everyone watching expected her to ask. The defense also expected her to, and before they could ask, Bev had hurriedly concluded the proceedings. Because of her failure to ask, all 12 jurors should now have to confirm their votes on the record.
Personally, I would've indicated that we were hung on 1 charge if I'd written the jury note, but Karen still deserves any acquittals the negligent foreperson failed to mention in the final note.
Let's get Runkle to 300k, folks!❤
You’re the best Runkle!!!
One exception to double jeopardy in the US is civilian and military courts (for military personnel) - see Eastburn murders - ft Bragg as 1 example
Also, federal charges vs state charges. Jeopardy only applies to the jurisdiction that charged you.
Judge: we need to take measures to protect the identity of the jurors lest they be harassed
Jurors' friends: 📣📣📣
Which honestly tracks for this case
Tbf, they didn't go to the media, they reached out to the defense attorneys with legal concerns
@-c3202 very fair! Though I think the fact that it got more than 1 degree of separation from the juror is concerning. If I tell a friend a piece of information and they go telling another friend, then I have lost control over that info. We know of the communication to the lawyer, we don't know how much farther their identity has spread
@@animal_cookie also very fair! Juror A and Juror....I think it was B? concern me less than the one where the intermediary is relaying everything to the informant. Though also the juror is having Zoom meetings talking about their experience and we don't know how exclusively they chose participants in that (just close friends/family? wider social circle?), so it's hard to know exactly how much the juror cares about their identity being known without more info
I honestly dont think they wanted to charge on the 2nd count - but felt like they had to 'get her' on something because they felt intimidated by the McO'Alberts. Just my opinion
Just when we thought this case couldn’t get messier it does. With Read, Walsh and Birchmore this area is going through a lot.
Thanks Runkle!!
Caught the VoD. It's great to hear your perspective. And, to compare it to Emily, Peter & Dad, and Lee.
I think on Day 31 when the Judge read the jury instructions, the impression is given that thenjury form is only filled out after a unanimous decision on all charges . This lead to an option where guilty/not guilty verdicts on some charges and mistrial on others was not an option.
The CW probably upgraded the charge to try to pressure KR into a plea deal
I wonder if they felt obligated to after the grand jury.
No, they did not. Now we're just making things up?
@@Haarschmuckfachgeschafttadpole ?
Dear Runkle of the Bailey, hearing about your plan to work pro bono makes me so incredibly happy! Wonderful. Unfortunately, there will always be a screaming need for pro bono attorneys so I salute your choice. The day I climb out of my abyss of debt and hopefully one day have a divorce agreement honored, I will happily kick in for that.
Thanks for leading us through the mess that Karen Read lives in every second of the day. Its such a strange and suspicious mess...
Just looked up the Captain Kori book and came across the “other” one… all of the reviews mention “endorsed by Pixie/Kori’s mom” in some way or another and that POS has apparently gotten all the negative reviews taken down by Amazon somehow. If Pixie is against this book, those reviews and the blurb describing the book as having the “advanced knowledge and permission” of Kori and Pixie needs to be removed too. Imagine taking advantage of a child who passed… I could never.
"The Scots have some feelings about the monarchy" - truest words I ever did hear 😂
I like the word "hereinafter". I like compound prepositions, but usually they only have two prepositions.
My brain is chewing on this like five year old bazooka Halloween gum because like herein is also allowable, as is hereafter but not inafter.
Hereintofore 😊
@@DamnedEternal intofore…tofore… infore? lol
@@DamnedEternal Nice.
I don't want you to be eternally damned. I want you to trust in the Messiah. Look to the cross.
Mistakes were made in the rush to move past this Jury.
Mistakes by who?
They didn't turn in any paper work - normally the Judge reads each Charge and result. They don't have to poll each Juror but they always ask the foreperson if the form is correct on each count . P & D can't ask for polling on a hung count but MUST be allowed to ask for polling of the Jury on each non-hung count. P&D were not given that option as required.
In most States the Judge MUST declare a mistrial on each count and that requires a affidavit or fact from the Jury that one has occured on each count. Can't be verbal or a "note" from the Jury.
@@danielweston9188 Thanks for the clarification. Hope the judge can be disciplined for her actions.
Awesome goal Runkle!!!! Ian we support you
The jury completely ignored the FBI expert on if he got hit by a car or not. Why does everyone keep calling them smart? They can’t even remember which one is Higgins.
Tbf, without more context from being an outside observer and rewatching trial days, all the Brian's (there are at least 4!) would probably confuse me, too
@@-c3202 Higgins got rid of his phone on the military base. I didn’t even have a notebook for notes. And why be intimidated if they think she accidentally did it?
They call them smart because insulting the jury is badly viewed. If you say anything bad about a jury no court will take you seriously.
@@mellie4174 we’re not in court.
18:35 Ok. I made the same mistake Ian. We don't have merely Juror B and Informant B AKA intermediary B. Just as with the C's, the informant and the intermediary are different people. Informant B received screenshots from Intermediary B.
😵💫🔄🔄🔄🥴
Let's hope these ppl know not to delete and yeet
Did they rehouse the verdict sheets, or did Chloe eat them? What if anything did Bev do to mess up this verdict being entered into the record? Its sus to say the least.
Lol
Sorry judge, my dog ate the jury form.
I still come over to hear what you think regardless 😂😂😂 cant miss out on the Runkle opinion
Dude the product description on the other book is wild! F that guy
Who can actually see the verdict slips that are turned in after the verdict?
It seems like the judge and the judge only....🫢 But I don't know for sure😂
@@astrialindah2773Not a good look for her. Yikes!
Replay crew, thanks Runkle. 🎉🎉🎉🎉
If Bev gets removed, the prosecution will not go forward with a retrial.
It's political s**cide to retry it either way!
Lmfao 100, million 98 days we've been here
Someone please take the uss Constitution and move it out of Boston harbor. No form of the Constitution belongs in Mass
Move it down to Florida! We love our sweet tea! In fact, we could have a Tea Party! (I like mine with lemon.)
I’m working right now, love it 😍 my Elvin Targaryen law dude 😊
To be fair the queen was a bit of a bad ass in her day
Post-EDB viewing ❤
Same!
I'm pre-EDB tonight. Love EDB, but I love Runkle as well - gonna start sharing the love. ♥️
@@alandry2482😊I love them both as well.
@@alandry2482 I love Runkle’s defense perspective on this motion personally but I’m also like, binging all the lawtube haha
I watch everyone's coverage including the Karen haters. They are unhinged and are writing diss tracks😢. I see a defamation lawsuit in their future .
The judge hasn't even tried to hide her bias in favor of the prosecution. It's like she can see where the evidence leads and is determined to protect the police from future prosecution so she tried to steer the verdict.
More conspiracy nonsense.
Never look for a conspiracy when simple incompetence will explain everything.
Intended to make this live but had an unexpected IRL guest show up at my home who forbade me CZcams whilst in her presence. It was a tough ask! Here for the replay. Missed Chat, but still enjoying myself. 🙂💜
Who was your guest? One of the McAlberts?😂
Thanks for the nice evening and keeping me company
I just got to the part where someone commented that they are going to cancel their membership because Runkle has too extreme views on anti monarchy. And lol, Runkle had the least extreme take on monarchy I have heard. Spend 1 day in Ireland, you'll hear some unsavory shit about the king and the monarchy in general.
As an American, I didn't know folks still had positive view of the monarchy.
Frankly, as an American, I don't think about any other country. Too much bad stuff happening here to focus on anything else.
@thatssewjessica I know very little and care very little about the monarchy, but just the death of the queen was enough to show that it's still a big thing and some people really still love the monarchy. People were driving hours to be at the path where they drove her around the UK. I think it's mostly the older generations that think it's great and like Runkle said the Queen was probably more liked than the king is and the rest of the family. And I get not wanting to pay attention to other countries problems when we have our own, but world news is still important at times
Chumbawamba were English from Lancashire. The song in question was done as a B-side to the "Tubthumping" 7" single in the UK and Europe and was released by EMI - Universal - Republic. It was not release here in Canada or the US.
My god! Remind me never to visit Canada! I don't want to be wrongly accused of something and bled dry by the government gouvernement just to end up in jail.
Replay crew! Great stream Runkle.
Ian, You are a Real Super Hero!!! I love the way you are ready to fight for right... Help Pixie to get rid of the AH's fake Kori book... and hopefully make him pay!!!
Good luck on your endeavors Runkle. You're a good man Charlie Brown!
Thanks Runkle! Please take care of yourself thru this trial! ❤ Love your Runkleisms haha Love From New Brunswick Canada 🇨🇦
i think Minnesota would be a great place to try to practice law
Proctor is done, but it can't happen in a day. realize he's a member of the state employees union, so he's entitled to due process. the fact that they moved him to "without pay" says everything
I agree!
Brian Albert has also been suspended.
@@bettywood5812Kevin
@@bettywood5812not Brian Albert. He was BPD and retired shortly after John died.
It’s Kevin Albert, who is with Canton PD, who was suspended with pay for misplacing his badge and gun
@@williamp6800 I meant Brian's son. I thought he was a junior. Thanks for the correction.
💯 GUILTY.
And I still maintain my opinion on jury verdict forms and instructions. They should be written as simple as possible, with simple language and short sentences. Not because juries are dumb but because no one can misinterpret anything if it is clearly written. No one has to be confused because the instructions and forms are such a spaghetti language there's no up or down on them, if it's written simply.
The jury can't meet up for beers in public to avoid being identified as jurors.
Zoom meetings are preferable for some as there might be in the group: introverts, non drinkers, those of limited means, those who can't get babysitters.
@Ian do you have the amended juror forms? If so, would you PLEASE send them to Kurt at Uncivil? He's arguing with EVERYONE that we're all wrong.
The new atty is to rep them in the event they have to testify, too.
Unreal, too, she never let the attys see the notes!!
Kurt argues with everyone! I unsubscribed to him a long time ago because of it. He's so annoying!
@cindyjackson5627 true, Kurt likes to be a bit of a contrarian or does his best to outwit people just to make himself feel better
Kurt is unhinged fr
EDIT: just watched his vid. He isn’t wrong about what he’s saying. Some people are making alternative arguments and he’s making a very specific claim about the forms, but he isn’t wrong.
Kurt is usually right, as far as I can tell as a lay person. His style doesn’t click for everyone, but his opinions are backed by facts. He has even changed my mind about a few things with his arguments.
@@courtneyr6645I agree. I think he's right but there's no need to cuss people out.
Replay crew.
25:22 Feels like the jury thinks they were the ‘drunk’ police? Karen, did have huge remorse on Sunday, imo, Jen convinced many that KR had hurt JO. Fact though, KR was on JO wifi at 12:34 and she had a drive to get there. JO lost pints, or liters of blood. The leaf blower exposed a few tablespoons that leaked as he lay, as a prop for Lucky’s plow victim. Imo, had KR not broke her light, Lucky would have been the Patsy? Imo….
Did you see where Officer Albert was put on leave because of Trooper Proctor? Albert was put on leave before he even testified. If they insist on trying her again, they need a change of venue.
The defense argued against speaking objections, not objections followed by the legal reason for the objection.
This is the only court I’ve ever seen where they have to approach after an objection to state the legal reasoning. It’s ridiculous. What is surprising is that the defense for Baldwin were surprised by this. One would think they watched the other trial and already knew about this and wouldn’t be surprised by this nonsense.
The speaking objections were bad in the Hannah g case, that she had them approach the bench every time. If he instead of filing a motion about another case (which is so odd) and just used his remedy to object he likely would have gotten what he wanted. Instead she slapped him back so hard with approach the bench. Be careful what you ask for.
Morrissey just bowled over Bowles. He was really out of his depth and she took full advantage of it.
If/when my abuser takes me back to court, you’re all more than welcome to follow it. Maybe that would put a stop to the corruption 🤔😂😭
Excellent information
Ty. God bless
🙏
Hi Runkle!
Just so you know, Chumbawumba are, in fact, English - not that it matters much to me, but not everyone , contrary to popular belief , is a royalist in England. Watching on replay, I didn't see chat, no offence intended- just a comment.
If they overturn count 3 they will have a hard time proving count 2. It’s hard to prove manslaughter if a jury has found she didn’t leave him dead or injured.
I love your commentary 😊😊
Replay crew 🦄
we need to lose the “Karen’s” and embrace the “Rita’s”
Why is it always anyone's fault but the defense? They have mouths, they know how to talk? If they wanted the jury polled, ASK!! Now the taxpayers will pay for all this nonsense that could have been avoided by the defense opening their mouth. This whole free karen read thing is too much, kind of like Murdaugh & look where he is! Proctor being suspended is because of his distasteful text. Not because she didnt do it.
Didn't the judge tell them not to fill put the forms until they were unanimous?
She did. So they followed her directions… 🤦🏻♂️
Auntie Bev will blame it all on the changes that Jackson asked for.
Ian, I get that judges makes mistakes and can’t be punished for every little thing. But KR’s freedom hangs in the balance. Bev may not be reprimanded, but she certainly needs to investigate the messages the defense received and then act accordingly and clean up her mess. How in the world did a judge NOT have the jury write SOMETHING on the verdict forms stating that they were a hung jury or which charges they’d been able to come to a collective guilty or not guilty. Her “We’ve always done it this way” is out of touch and reeks of her ego getting in the way. I’m appalled!
Massachusetts Rule of Criminal Procedure
Rule 27 - Verdict
(b) Several Offenses or Defendants. If there are two or more offenses or defendants tried together, the jury may with the consent of the judge at any time during its deliberations return or be required by the judge to return a verdict or verdicts with respect to the defendants or charges as to which a verdict has been reached; and thereafter the jury may in the discretion of the judge resume deliberation. The judge may declare a mistrial as to any charges upon which the jury cannot agree upon a verdict; *provided, however, that the judge may first require the jury to return verdicts on those charges upon which the jury can agree and direct that such verdicts be received and recorded.*
Wow. Thanks.
I get mall phobia in any mall lol 😅😅😅
I hope you can tube full time 😊 I prefer your commentary and then doing free law is awesome.
Missed this last night but here we are at 3am.. up again due to Puppy named AlPacino who has a broken leg and wants to lay on my face with his cast
EDB and Runkle starting at the same time is fine for me xD I have to replay crew both of you anyway, because both of you started at around 2:30 am my time and I'm asleep by then. So I can just watch both streams after one another xD
Replay crew over dinner 🫶🫶🫶
Replay crew tonight. Want to hear your take as defense as opposed to EDB! BTW, EDB said in this case, the juror lockdown is forever.
What do you mean by lockdown?
@@meln4214 They are never going to reveal the names of the jurors. The jurors can reveal themselves but the judge thinks in this case it could be dangerous to the jurors to reveal their identities. Think about the number of cops involved in this case.
Good Luck with ProBono
😳
Thanks Runkle. You’re the best. 🥰
Ian talking about people not being able to afford an attorney is one of the scariest things about this trial. KR could be any one of us. Luckily KR and her family were/are able to pay for some of the best attorneys. A lot of us wouldn’t be able to hire attorneys of their caliber.
Auntie bev has screwed this us so bad that the state should just drop it and try to save face.
I believe the judge was looking for the court reporter.
52:29 As an dual Aussie and UK citizen who doesn't give a toss about the monarchy, I reckon you'd enjoy listening to The Smiths song The Queen Is Dead. Lyrically.. well.. it's Morrissey, so.. you just gotta.
I too listened to The Smiths in the 80's as a kid. The sentiments about RF & the Establishment, 80's workers being laid off globally, lies about wealth trickle down effect - impacted us Xgens. However the disdain for the RF has definitely changed since The Smiths songs of 40 yrs ago.
The tide has turned for the Monarchy & they have never been more popular. Thanks in no small part to the vast contrast of the RF to the idiotic, entitled, work-shy duo Harry & Meghan.