F1's looming crisis
Vložit
- čas přidán 31. 01. 2023
- You know Formula 1, the car race sport that is massively popular around the world and skyrocketed to fame in the US in 2022 based on the popularity of the Netflix series Drive to Survive. That F1.
F1 gets all this money and attention because big companies are investing in and advertising their cutting edge tech. - basically “look how great we are at building cars, buy from us!” But that also means that the tech gets outdated, that's a problem...
If you're wondering "Is F1 going electric?" then you'll want to watch this: • The Electric Formula 1...
If you're wondering "What is F1?" then this video is for you: • Formula 1, Explained f...
#shorts #F1 #car #technology #sciencefacts
F1 will always be relevant for the racing. We don't need horses but people watch horse racing.
Good point
Yep, we also have classic racing which is great fun but ultimately.. it's niche and OEM's and niche..
Yeah. But lately there isn’t a whole lot of racing.
f1 costs hundreds of millions though
Not a lot of people though. The reason F1 is popular is because it’s an exiting display of good driving and good-ass tech. Horse racing isn’t popular unless you gamble
"So is F1 going to go fully electric or somebody else going to get their first"
Formula E: "Am I a joke to you?"
You are to everyone else 😏
*there
Forumla E is unfortunately indeed a joke, and it has nothing to do with the cars being electric 😬.
@@bugsamThen how is it a joke? The racing is closer and more exciting than F1 has been for a very long time. I watch and greatly enjoy both but I don't see why Formula E is considered so inferior. As a racing enthousiast, I get more out of the on-track action or Formula E
I believe the plan is to convert to hydrogen fuel cells.
“Could someone else get there first?” Formula E is in its 9th season
Yeah. But could Formula E, become faster than F1? Or will F1 go electric before or when the tech is ready for that? It's quite an interesting dilemma. Who knows if it's 10 or 60 years before batteries are supperior to petrol, but it is after all just down to that single component to make EVs superior. Efficiency and power density of the electric motors are on a different planet compared to ICE, but batteries aren't up for the task yet. Far from it as of now.
@@oes2546electric cars are a waste
But Formula E is rubbish
@@Kl0zi9999 Doesn’t change the fact that it makes that final statement super dumb
She means will somebody else take the attention and funding away from F1, Formula e hasn't done that yet.
No, the looming crisis is called Max Verstappen.
Synthetic fuel just entered the chat.
Would you please leave my good friend Cyn out of the fuel please?
@@dpm2937 if u stop to dig lithium
Come on ! You are totally right, but at least spell it right ! Synthetic
I really think that Synthetic fuel is more of an innovation and a longer-term solution for our cars. I think the best way to have our cars is electric in the cities, and with synthetic fuel for longer trips outside the cities. Also, I assume the cars that will run on synthetic fuel will be cheaper to produce, as electric cars are expensive.
@@andreabortolotto2761 that was a joke because he spelled it Cynthetic instead of Synthetic. Has nothing to do with what he said.
In the good ol' days, F1 was there to sell cigarettes.
Marlboro
And booze!!!
Now it's there to sell energy drinks.
Very true! The good ol days.
Now they're selling same sex marriage, pronouns and 💩 racing
Those JPS cars were something else 👏🏾😊
Let me rant for a moment- I’m not saying there isn’t some benefit, but production and disposal of batteries have environmental implications that have yet to be addressed
OMG i found somebody with a brain???
The electric vehicle industry is *UTTERLY UNSUSTAINABLE!!*
Would you like to elaborate?
@@uncookednoodles8775lithium batteries are an enormous burden on the environment
Lithium mining requires massive smmounts of ore gathered in huge mines. Lithium refining is a toxic and energy intensive process, batteries have lower energy by weight than liquid or gas fuels, lithium batteries only have a 10 year lifespan,and its incredibly bad for the environment once it is thrown away.
All adding ro the fact that one industry sucking up that much lithium would massively increase its price, making qll mobile electronics more expensive.
@@uncookednoodles8775Electric car batteries use a rare polluting resource to be constructed. They have less energy storage copasity then fossil fuels. Resulting in significantly less range. I recommend @AdamSomething. He made a video on the tesla truck which attempted to replace long hoal fossil fuel trucks. It fails horribly. Large charge time, limited capacity, worse performance and degration of said performance during low temperatures, and much less distance on a full charge.
I'm as progressive and left as you'll find but this isn't political, it's basic thermodynamics. Unless we find some radical new electrical storage method, electric cars won't be a solution. Not even remotely.
@@uncookednoodles8775 Almost all the electricity for electric cars comes from burning coal in coal powerplants. As well as the HUGE emissions generated from creating just one electric car battery
@@uncookednoodles8775 no need, hop on google mate
There is no crisis... We going synthetic fuel mode... Even audi n porsche are joining in.
Exactly. Its literally in their 2026 goals
Synthetics are vaporware
Word on the block is porche's already got it...
jup
@@TheShoaibworld it already exists. It’s just absurdly expensive and impossible to mass produce effectively. $40+ a gallon isn’t gonna stop EVs. They have to perfect the development and production to reduce costs to make it effective
California: you're not allowed to buy any cars that aren't electric.
Also California: you're not allowed to charge your car right now because the power grid can't handle it.
in 2035...
We’ve decided to relax the carbon requirements on all this coal were burning, but cracking down on cars because that’s clearly the cause of climate change, the peasants
@@vanillaicecream2385 ...and then let's all get in our private jets to go discuss how carbon emissions are destroying the world...
Because it is not about CO2 or about climate, it's all about control in the first step, and about the commands from the Georgia Guidestones in the second.
@@januszlepionko you are insane.
Problem is I don’t think the majority of the world can afford going fully electric
Maybe that’s the point ☹️
Travel and freedom of movement might become a privilege of the upper classes not a right for most as it is now.🤷
The horse and buggy people said the same thing about the car.
@@Smoked_Cheddar Cars weren't mandated by government regulation. People saw they were easier to deal with and faster, so most people adopted them. If such a situation does arise with electric cars, it won't need to be regulated to make it happen.
@@ascii7085There's these things called Public Transit, walking and biking. If you live in a good city, you don't need a car
A lot of car law is the encourage public transit, including as we move further from fossil fuels. It’s better to have a diesel bus moving 50 than a diesel truck moving 1.
“It’s a group science project” I absolutely LOVE that description! 😂😂
She called F1 a group science project and I can't even argue that lol
Well… I mean… yeah ok it is… lol
Given the amount of hand me down tech to the road cars, yeah
True F1 fans know they are going to use synthetic fuel from 2026
thank you!
Likely hydrogen after that
LOL. And this poser chick is a "fan".
@@xxxjake999xxx i doubt it. Imagine Grosjean’s crash if his fuel tank had hydrogen…
They’re already using E10 fuel (10% ethanol) and have a current goal to increase it to 100% by 2030
@@RobotSantaClaus but using H₂ would save soo much weight
Actually, the hybrid platform is a much better solution than is fully electric. MIT has a new concrete formulation that offers capacitance or "charging as you drive over/across it", but it will take a few minutes to implement it into the mix. 😊
F1 actually uses hybrid cars lol :)
Technology isn't "moving on". Electric cars are being legislated into existence. Big difference.
So true. Cleo is drinking the EV Flavor Aid. Disappointing as she's smart, likeable and easy on the eyes. I know she'll be votong for in November. Trump 2024!
Facts
Yeah, that’s why the US needs to impose huge trade barriers to protects its own electric car industry against the superior and cheaper Chinese cars.
Electric isn’t even emission free cause how the hell do you think they make the battery and the electricity to charge it with . I completely agree with you
@@Potato-wy5hq Yeah, if something can’t be completely emission free there is no benefit. Does this apply to everything? As long as a solution isn’t 100% perfect, it isn’t a solution?
if formula 1 becomes like formula e im gonna start watching horse races
Never happening since they'll use carbon zero sustainable fuel in a few years laters
Formular E is actually really fun to watch amyway and it isnt that bad. I would not mind seeing it turn into that especially for the saftey of the us and the enviroment.
And anyway im sure some Countries might make exceptions for F1 anyway before 2035 and im sure the owners of F1 are looking to see whether they can be an exception.
@@heh650 No its not. If it was any good it would've taken off by now.
@@josesammut9396 wdym? F2 is fun to watch yet that has not taken off. F1 is just dominating at the momment, however there are many good drivers in Formula E
@@josesammut9396 It actually has took off.
Formula E was indeed appealing to racing enthusiasts where races are still affordable and drivers aren't actually very far off F1 quality. A modest following do not mean it is not any good or competitive. Ask any other series other than F1.
I couldn't possibly disagree with you more
Crisis?
We got 6 different manufacturers in 2026 :
☑️ Audi
☑️ Ford
☑️ Mercedes
☑️ Alpine
☑️ Honda
☑️ Ferrari
red bull is making the internal combustion engine themselves, Ford is building the electrical components of the hybrid system and also injecting some cash.
formula e: exist
Everyone: iS fOrMulA oNE gOnNa gO eLeCtRiC
*Synthetic fuel enters the chat* F1 isn't gonna become formula e
Exactly. If it ever becomes formula E it would lose its entire fan base
Great point and an accurate one as well!
LOL, F1 is here to stay
Full electricity isn't the answer in society
@@Gamezoneadi exactly if we wanted electric cars we would watch formula e
@@spageddie3266 some people just like the sound of combustion engines. persons like me. I would hate hearing a car pass me sounding like a rc car lol
@@Gamezoneadi It will for sure. Already in 2026 the engine is becoming much more electric, like 60%. It's sad but politics matter more for the FIA than ideal. If they didnt care about politics, they would be running a non-hybrid turbo V6 or NA V10.
Formula e and synthetic fuel has entered the chat
Formula E: Yes. Synthetic fuel: No. Producing all this stuff is waaay to inefficient for the scale we use for cars these days.
Formula E is so slow compared, it will be interesting to see what will happen now.
@@elshid6046f1 aims to make synthetic fuel as efficient or even more efficient than current fuels and they will more than likely rival electric cars as it will be accepted quicker than electric cars ever got accepted
Formula E is still fringe compared to F1 sadly bc of lack of sponsors but it's very promising. Lets hope it catches up bc THAT would be an EV inovation vector.
@@elshid6046because digging up lithium then transporting half way across the world is more efficient, sure… Not to mention that there isn’t a single power grid that can handle full scale electrification on the planet.
Tech isn’t just moving on, central planners are attempting to control human behaviour instead of letting the market do its job
"Letting the market do its job?" Lmao ok
@@TheDarkPacificthe market doing its job as in allowing for people who want ev vehicles to just buy them, instead, they make overpriced ev pos, and ban icev making us all poorer and controlled along the way.
@@Yomotomenand they will be smart cars that tax you per mile, or high traffic times…oh, and they’ll shut down if you don’t support the current thing on social media or say something outrageous like Greta just needs a good 🍆. Oh well, there goes my ride.
yeah! electric cars are just a commie plot to take down us red-blooded freedom lovers!
F1 will be carbon neutral by 2030 so I don't think it will be a problem.
Someone should tell her about Formula E.
the 100 mph racing league where fans can vote on who wins
I went to one this weekend, race lasted 45min, and I'm probably never going again.... I'm just saying....
Did you miss the part in the video where she said to go watch the video she made (about Formula E)?
I was looking for this comment like it's definitely not ready to take over the stage F1 has but it's come a long way
They have exclusive rights to being an all electric series until 2050 anyway so F! couldn't go electric if they wanted to.
I’m pretty sure the people who love Formula One could care less about what people are driving on the road. In fact, it will probably make it even more romantic if nobody gets to hear an engine scream unless they go watch Formula One.
Exactly.
Taking part in F1 costs money, why would manufacturers bother if they couldn't recoup their costs implementing tech developed for the sport on their road cars?
@@deus_ex_machina_ lol you think thats how they recoup their costs? Because thats not how. The tech in f1 cars is rarely used in road cars, thats not where they get their money. Think about sponsors, merchandising, brand awareness, prize money. Thats how they get their money back.
@@bas7905Yeah but that's the point deus is making who would wanna invest in something that doesn't give returns and who would wanna buy the merchandise of a falling company
@@Cancel_Vulture but they DO make money of it.. you realise redbull, williams and haas dont manufacture cars? My point is they dont make money with implementing f1 tech they developed for road cars. They still make millions of dollars in other ways, more than the investments made to be in F1, in case of redbull for example. Your question makes no sense. Anyway, have a good one.
F1’s ERS system: Am I a joke to you
I went on a holiday with a electric car, I can tell you that is not holiday. It’s pure shit.
Cars didn't make horse races disappear, so the biggest threat to F1 isn't electric cars, but some new form of entertainment we might not know yet.
Virtual "reality"?
@@ulysse21 if I knew - I'd dump all money on that, but I don't know.
Or winning of some big team over and over and over again🤣
so, are you aware how much horse racing has lost in popular appeal since car racing became a thing
@@georgplaz personally, I prefer a sport practiced by a minority of amateurs and followed by a minority of true enthusiasts than a popular sport rotten by money and overmediatization. If inner combustion engined motorsport would become more discreet, that wouldn't be a problem
No way in hell everything goes electric. The resources don't currently exist, it's just political posturing.
Nor would it be a good thing if it all did go electric. These instagram "influencers" have no clue how precarious the world's power grids are. They're gonna learn though. The hard way. And take the rest of us down with them.
Not just the resources, the current electrical grid can't supply that much electricity. And that's ignoring the fact that current power plants can't create enough electricity to supply the demand.
Unless the whole developed world started building nuclear power plants like crazy, there will never be enough electricity for people to go full electric.
also, besides everything posted here, the demands of a f1 car certainly cannot be matched by a battery. maybe if they quadruple the pit stops and switch out the battery each time lol
Emphasis on the "currently." I like to go back and read photography magazines from the era just before the era when they no longer contained the world "film." Digital cameras to these sage forecasters were just a joke. Until they suddenly weren't.
@@Digital-Dan is a totally different scenario. Digital vs film cameras did not involve massive demands of natural resources. I can appreciate the analogy, but it's a bit of a stretch. This is not a matter of simply new technology as these influences would have you believe. Electric would be great if we could figure out how to make it work on a wide scale.
Let me introduce you to Synthetic Fuel. Batteries will have a new rival.
The key is to hear those engines roar!
As much as I’m 100% about new people getting into the sport, this seems more like a TikTok video than an educated opinion.
HAHAHA new people getting into f1.. These people arent into f1.. this is a political statement about electric cars. has nothing to do with f1.. she doesnt even know anything about f1
@@OPEK. you know that she has made another video on F1 before where she explains F1. She clearly has some knowledge
@@wardedmedusa5013 “where she explains F1” what does that even mean… anyone can google something and then read word for word what she’s sees online into a camera. She doesn’t even know about Formula E. You think she genuinely knows anything about F1
@@OPEK. You didn't watch that video right? (Or the one about Formula E)
@@OPEK. she literally has a video where she explains F1 to rookies
"Tell me you don't watch Formula 1 without saying you don't watch Formula 1"
Tell me you dont know anything about the f1 funding, without telling me you dont.
@@Phixersor F1 can and will survive without going electric.
Yeah but she knows what’s she’s talking about bro chill
@@fenn8686 she really doesn't at all. when she asks “is f1 going to go electric?” that just proves she knows nothing. f1 literally can't go electric, they have a licencing agreement that states that because it would make formula e obsolete. also she's making it seem like car companies are going to drop out because of this, when in the last year audie and ford have confirmed entry, and cadillac is heavily interested.
@@fenn8686 she probably does know what she’s talking about. However, she is still being disingenuous. Since she does know what she’s talking about, she knows all of the measures that are in place to transition. This video is clickbait. All of these “problems” she brings up, already have solutions. There is no crisis. And anyone who is an F1 fan will probably be disconnected from her sly message.
The basic problem with your opinion is that the electrical grid could never support it, and even a robust effort to augment the grid would take more than 3 decades to catch up to demand.
I think there would be bigger problems than F1 if we get to a point that internal combustion cars are no longer allowed. I seriously doubt that the majority of people would allow that to happen anytime soon, it’d be more likely for the governments to go away than the cars
“Gasoline cars banned” nitromethane cars 🗿
I cackled. See what I did there?
You can tell She’s been an F1 fan since “season 1”😂
top comment please!
Clever
Haha
You’re idiotic
Average DTS fan 😂
Formula E: Hold my beer
California is screwed without nuclear power.
Clout > Knowledge vibes.
Yep. This girl doesn’t seem to be an actual fan. Just a pretty face who’s talking about a topic that dudes like for views.
Banning one technology is not "technology moving on". It's government forcing one technology over another.
You are right that it is not technology moving on. It is society moving on.
@@Schmunisociety moving backwards 💀
@@crunchysoup406 disagreed
@@Schmuni electric cars do more harm to the planet then gasoline cars, we’re evolving alright just backwards
I'm fairly confident in the electric technology. I'm pretty certain that if government didn't ban dino juice, the market for it would fall out eventually; just not quickly enough to save our hides.
f1 and the FIA stated that they will never go fully electric due to FE owning the electric car brand of racing and they have thag right until about 2035/40
The entire EU is completely dependent on Russian natural gas via Gazprom; probably not the best situation to be in.
California needs to sort out way more issues before their nonsensical ban on gas vehicles.
“F1 is in a crisis”
Andretti/GM, Porsche and Audi are joining in the next few years.
Synthetic fuel and then I predict hydrogen combustion will take over
Hydrogen is too much of a change. Synthetic looks like the way to go
An accident with hydrogen fuel would make the Grosjean crash look like child’s play
When the US finally nuts up and stops playing paddy cake with Putin while simultaneously drilling to the center of the earth in search of sweet, sweet crude…. Everyone will forget about electric vehicles.
Hydrogen will never happen, not in our life times, you can't be driving 300kph with something that will explode like a bomb when you have an accident.
@@seanh5805 so would a lithium fire
bruh i dont care if they ban gasoline cars im still driving mine 💀
As someone with a ranch and woodshop who relies on a gas powered truck, the electric technology is not there for anyone rural. California can push the gimmick all they want, but a 100K truck with a 200 mile range (if you buy the upgrade subscription, of course) that gets totaled with a single undercarriage scratch is the joke of the decade -- couple that with a downed power grid, and you're talking about mass chaos outside of city limits... Which leads to mass chaos inside city limits.
@@CLove511 >which leads to mass chaos
Yeah, that's the point. They want our country to fail.
U probably don't want to drive gas cars of the future either. They will become big bloated things with super restrictive emission regulations.
Defffff
Please do. Drive your car until you can't make it run anymore. Getting another 10 years out of your current car would actually be better for the environment than buying a new electric car anyway due to the higher carbon footprint in electric car production. Your stubborn refusal to get an electric car is needed to avoid wasting the stock of second hand cars that should be used and not wasted.
Electric cars may be the future, but that doesn't mean we should throw away the cars that are already here, just that we should stop making new ones.
Formula E exists, also electric vehicle scope is a myth. Gonna be phased out by ammonia engines as soon as they arrived in the market.
Tell me you don’t know what you are talking about without telling me you don’t know what you’re talking about
Well shit, I hope Ford, GM, Mclaren, Aston Martin, Ferrari, Mercades and Honda get to see this video in time.
"technology is moving on" proceeds to explain how politics is changing the possibilities for technological sales
"when you forget the profit motive stifles technological improvement"
You mean like how bought politicians foisted the highway system while at the same time gutting mass transit. Or are you only blinkered to the ideas you believe?
F1 mostly "And Max Verstappen has won once again!"
Back to sailGP, where f1 tech goes to sailing boat
No one has been able to convince me that digging lithium out of the ground for batteries is the future…
F1 is developing carbon neutral synthetic fuels, that’s the future for me.
Clearly you know very little about newer batteries if you think they are still going to be using rare earth materials.
Solid state batteries will be able to use glass and other abundant materials soon enough. It will be a million times better than synthetic fuel.
@@Sean-pm2vd You know that you'll still need electricity to power those batteries right? Plus the synthetic fuel that Porsche is developping could even consume more CO2 that it produces
@@zephyr_855 obviously you still need electricity but that can be got from renewable sources. The production of synthetic fuel will also need lots of electricity plus you still need to ignite it to produce power. Ignition still releases harmful gases. Batteries will be the way forward, guaranteed.
@@Sean-pm2vd Of course ignition produce harmful gasses, but that's what i'm trying to tell you, Porsche's fuel will be about combining it with CO2 took from the air to make a combustible that will produce less CO2 that it originally took from the air making it carbon negative
@@Sean-pm2vd bruh, the production of glass needs lot’s of energy as well, what kind of argument is that? 😂
Formula E: Am I a joke to you?
Norway is a bit ahead of the curve, and decided years ago that we're banning the sale of new gas cars from 2030.
One thing to note is that F1 can't go fully electric until 2035, because Formula E has an exclusive contract to being the only "fully electric racing car championship sanctioned by the FIA".
So either F1 merges or buys out Fe, or they break apart from the FIA. Either option seems viable at this point.
In the meantime, F1 powertrains are having higher and higher amounts of hybridization, with a big engine overhaul planned for 2026. This new era of engines is looking very promising to engine manufacturers as the hybrid components are being designed to be very relevant to their street legal counterparts.
Another option is they can switch to hydrogen
@@JustAnotherSeeker isn’t hydrogen a bit more dangerous
They’ll probably just put a 1 cylinder engine and add like 1600 hp of energy and call it a hybrid
They can go 99.9% electric and .01% gas. Problem solved
One could only wish Formula E were not so rife with gimmicks (Fan Boost? Really?)
Tell me you don't watch F1 with out telling me
If f1 ever goes electric I’m starting a revolution
Wait how are u gonna fill an electric f1 car in like 2.03 seconds how????? Bro dosent it take like an hour to do it normally 😂
Love f1 but here in south Africa we have no electricity to do anything 😢
Formula E no longer coming to Cape Town. Can't guarantee electricity to charge the cars. 😂
Here in South Africa we have nothing*
Fixed that for you
🇱🇧🤝🇿🇦
Having no electricity
It's no more than a 10 minute search to learn that F1 is investing in moving to sinthetic fuels
And that formula E is a thing
Going all electric is going to smack us very badly as of now no one know the side effects
Imagine how fast it would be if technology goes crazy
We cant . Formula has the right till 2030
2040*
Luckily I wish they have it till 2100 so we can continue watch real racing
I believe this argument is generally correct, but not always correct. The leading team of F1, Oracle Red Bull Racing isn't even a car manufacture team. It is true that some F1 technology will end up in mass produce manufactured car( except Mercedes AMG-ONE, so expensive), but the point of leading a team, let alone the best team in the grid, is for publicity, like a giant, moving billboard. When we see Max Verstappen cross the finish line, we see Red Bull. And that, is advertisement.
Ever heard of Honda ?
@@TonVanDerAa When you heard Max Verstappen, who do people associate him with? Is he a Redbull driver or Oracle Red Bull Racing Team driver? People's tongue will roll into the former one. Short, catchy, and snappy. Max and Redbull.
Even Honda are rumored to come back as a full pledged team with their own engine, driver, and manufacture. They want to bring Honda name again to the podium, after Red Bull dropped them in favor of in-house manufacture, or Ford, based on the latest rumor.
@@michaelantonius321 I Associate him with winning and being dutch. Not so much with a teamname or brand. Same as every sport, you respect the talent, not the sponsor. Tried red bull once, its disgusting.
@@TonVanDerAa But....Max was winning races before Red Bull was even working with Honda, like wasn't the Renault even badged as a TAG Heuer when Max picked up his first win? Sports drink company with a watch maker logo on their engines lmao. Also I love Honda but regardless of how often they say they're serious about F1, they won't, they know that honestly F1 is so far removed from road cars already that no one is convinced to buy a civic because an F1 car is powered by a Honda engine.
@@TheRealSquirre1 Like I said, I watch the guy for his talent, not for the brands hes displaying on his car . So dont know what your answer has to do with that.
I thought this video is going to be about wires in the car... LOOMS!
F1 will never go fully electric. The FIA acquired formula E to prevent formula 1 going full electric. Even if they would go, it would basicly be 2 identical series competing for the same market which is bad for business and sponsors alike.
Ban Californian Politicians
Republican moment ^
Ban American politicians
@@OIekahell of a lot better than Californians. 🤣
Finally someone says it
@@rhysgoodman7628Can’t wait to live in a Republican state and get paid 9$ an hour and send my 9 year olds to work at the meat packing plant as the government bans healthcare and encourages shootings and gives corporations another tax break
F1 can't be F1 with full electric.
Yep, Formula E or maybe F1 with electric is way way better ♥️
Or with fewer than 10 cylinders, for that matter.
@@Digital-Dan damn I guess the MP4/4 ain’t f1 then
@@earthling_parth how is an overweight, noiseless car that you have to nurse round the track better than a firespitting v8/v10 that has an incredible sound, gives the car a lighter weight and is raced harder?
@@earthling_parth electric car suck at racing
Can you do a video on the constructors championship in F1
There is an eletric equivalent (without the same level of money yet).. and it is AWESOME.. also because it is eletric it can be run in places where noise pollution would normally prohibit F1.
They have already announced that they are going to use synthetic fuel in 2026 which means F1 will never go electric
What's sad is that I don't think people understand how bad lithium ion batteries are in terms of "being green". I remember reading about the fact that a Tesla only becomes better for the environment after like 8 years of use compared to a internal combustion engine. But the problem is that the battery will need to be replaced by that time. And not only that, but most of the energy that is used to charge an electric car comes from fossil fuels, so it's only better for the environment if it is only recharged on renewable resources. I like the fact that we are rapidly developing the technology for electric cars for a greener future, but I think that it's foolish to ban the ICE because of how efficient we have made it. I'm sure that governing bodies are aware of this, but they must think that it's better to make the bans so the technology develops *really* quickly.
Old conspiracy theories die hard.
Electric cars are not eco friendly as long as we dont have good reliable renewable energy sources. And there is a long way before that, not till 2035 or even 2050
@@jurekgadzinowski2895 nuclear power plants were invented in 1947
People in 1946
While I appreciate this long comment, but I think you should go back to reading. You're basically repeating old conspiracies from a decade ago.
@@snowgw2 it’s not a conspiracy theory though my guy lol
i dont wanna leave the great sound of an roaring engine..., what is the fun in hearing tire noises in an f1 racing competition
F1 has been in crisis since that race in Abu Dhabi
F1 is watched because it's exciting. Brands are there because people watch. Redbull doesn't even make cars. The technology is irrelavent because it's so divorced from road cars. Developing alternative fuel will help because industrial engines will be hard to replace on account their energy density.
You my friend are very wrong
There are so many tech innovations that were invented in formula 1 and then went to normal road cars, but not only, like for example some programs for air traffic control who use the same technology as f1 data gathering. Some other examples are active suspension, I think paddle shifters, the dashboard and many others
There is a video on that somewhere
@@Lavie_ F1 technology has very circuitous path to road cars. It's like the avant garde fashion of automotive design.
@@sadface7457 as I said they don’t only innovate in the car performance field, but in all kinds of fields
Like security, car protection systems and softwares, engine developments for sustainability and more
Ten years from now the whole world will realize that the electric car is the biggest environmental crisis of the century.
True that
yup. look at what's going on in the congo, people dying by the thousands to get cobalt, the key ingredient to lithium ion. musk hoarding billions while the people who mine his materials die, and nobody driving an electric car thinks twice about that
@@DragoBTC your source is a Tesla(!) video??? Gtfo.
Batteries for electric cars require a lot of rare Earth metals. Produced by slave labor and an ecological disaster all by itself. They cannot be recycled properly. So what happens to them, where do they end up?
@@DragoBTC you just listened to testa investor day video. electric car media talking about oil. i mean you are doing exactly what you accuse him of :D
@@vishnuashok2890 Read Morgan Stanley's note on Investor day 🤷🏼
Formula E 🗿
Drill baby. Drill. We have all the oil we need.
banning gasoline cars is unbelievably cringe
Lol. Okay.
@@indifferentadvocate1737 well?
Many motorsports have adopted alternative fuels, such as NASCAR with Ethanol, which has not only produced great racing and performance, but also lower emissions.
Part of the thrill of motorsports is the sound of the engines of the cars. F1 going electric isn't a good move. Besides, Formula E is already a thing.
F1 should consider ethanol.
Not just cringe, it is *GIGACRINGE*
Banning internal combustion is stupid. Fossil fuels are sub-optimal, and if we could move away from them, that would be best.
@@nolanpeters5462 internal combustion is suboptimal. The maximum theoretical efficiency of them is incredibly low compared to fuel cell or battery electric.
Reject modernity, embrace tradition
No lithium, more carbon
Every time I go to a restaurant I get 2 straws, one for me and one for the ocean
@@thetoptige8014 kinda like that save the trees sticker I saw above the exhaust of a Mopar
@@thetoptige8014 what kind of edge lord comment is this
@@elsimic a joke, kinda like the original comment
So there will be no F1 for EU and america
F1 will figure out a better way and technology will trickle down to our daily cars, like it always has.
Formula E enters the chat: wtf lady? Are we nothing to you?
formula E is the test pad for F1, normalizing it now for the future
Formula E is nothing to anyone.
That's the irony she's all about electric racing and doesn't even know it already exists... and sucks balls.
Formula E is nothing...to most people, yes.
Yes it is nothing..
I question exactly how big of a f1 fan she really is
Yeah it hilarious.. she doesnt know anything about it.
I think she got into it during DTS, but she goes to races and makes videos about it. She obviously enjoys it. She also likes FE 🤷♂️
Right. No f1 fan wants electric engine.
@@johnnysinger3353 no, that’s not F1. I like FE though. It’s a good place to throw all the ideas at, instead of F1. Electric engines, power ups, fan boost, street races. It’s all good and FE is a great home for it. They can throw DRS over there too. F1 doesn’t need DRS. If a faster can’t pass a slower car, don’t need to give it cheats
This just means the price of my vintage sports car goes up in 2035.
There are Electric Formula 1s, they’re called FE and the most recent contest was in Rome, Italy. They aren’t as fast as regular F1s but they are gradually improving
I feel like when she become a teacher All the children who are in that school will love her😂
She’s teaching us on YT and we love her
Fr she's teaching us on yt and we love her
Maybe for her other videos, but this one is an outright shitty video. Like a person above me said, this is just a TikTok opinion, not an educated statement.
We stopped using the horse for transport 100 years ago but we still race them.
Car phones weren’t that great. But I regret the phone company taking my land line from me.
To be honest, it seems like you have no idea about F1
I’m not converting and I’m not leaving. CA will hear from the majority of consumers who can’t afford and don’t want electric vehicles that will pile up with dead batteries all over the state. No thanks. Keep F1 fast and loud.
Yeah, unfortunately people often don’t pay attention until it affects them. There will be a lot of people that will be shocked when they show up to dealerships in 2035 and there’s nothing but expensive electric cars on offer.
It’s like back when they reminded people for 3 years that they’d need a box to watch TV, and they had to push it back constantly because so many people never got rid of their antenna TV
@@hornetguy9063great reference
They have made it horrically silent since 2014
@@eggselent9814 no
@@lucasng4712 Mate have you heard the sounds of the engines since 2014 compared to the V8 and V10 era? Its a joke. The cars are now too big and aerodynamic, so you can't even pass without a literal gimmick that requires no skill.
Not to forget that there has been one or maybe 1,5 seasons where two drivers from different teams had a shot at winning the title in 9 years......
I miss the old days when i used to drive freely on a v12.
They are gunna have to fix the power grid issues before Cali actually enforces that. Not a chance in hell the state known for rolling blackouts can handle everyone charging their EVs at night.
Banning sales without changing prices? They really need to make the cars cheaper before banning sales
This assumes they care. There’s an argument to be made for gross incompetence, but also one for further dividing classes of people. The well off will be fine they cutting edge tech, their servants can live on site or be electric bused in.
There is no crisis. You can tell she is a drive to survive fan.
Yeah fr. It’s pretty funny, bc I’ve never seen dts, but all the new F1 fans I talk to say that’s how they got into it
The moment I realized she's talking about the EV transition, couldn't help but laugh 😀 Amazing that such casual takes get so much attention
@@lodestar3984I avoid DTS like the plague, as a 14 year American I don't want my perspective of the sport to be lost
Banning ICE Cars is just the dumbest thing.
Ikr. Governments run with the electric cars are good for the environment narrative because they make money from every sale. It's such bullshit.
ICE is such a dumb, outdated technology, we only stuck with because of oil companies' propaganda. That doesn't mean F1 has to ban it though. I'm sure they can still improve the EV massively without getting rid of the ICE component
Yeah, these nations and American states are going to regret that, I think. I’m sure there will be all sorts of grandfather clauses and delays as the population rejects it
Oh these places are moronic. It’s never going to happen until much later
@@hornetguy9063 lol, no
Bruh, just keep the damn gas engines its 20 cars after all, it doesnt need to go electric. All road cars can go electric just keep f1, 20 cars with sustainable fuel wont do much.
Aerodynamic forehead. In fact, that's a fivehead.
The fact that manufacturing electric cars is more impactful on the environment than an ICE equivalent, means nothing will change.
But the low emissions lifespan more than makes up for it.
@@matthewdilks2677 Really? Via the coal fuelled power stations all over the world? You have to drive an EV car for 100,000 + miles to offset the impact to make it. People will be buying a new car by 100,000 + miles and the cycle starts all over again. So this bull shit narrative we are being feed is only fooling the uneducated.
Why is nothing being done about container ships that spew crap loads of toxic crap into the environment, which are one of the biggest pollutants in the world. Why is lead fuel still being used in commercial Airliners?
Mining cobalt is extremely toxic and a requirement for EV batteries. Carbon dioxide and nitrogen dioxide emission are highest from cobalt mining. Yeah, the mighty EV cars are our saviour. Wake up and educate yourself for once.
@@MrRadialdrift link some studies supporting your “facts”.
@@matthewdilks2677 Sorry, I forgot how lazy the next generation is and can't be arsed to educate themselves. Go find it yourself, I had to, or don't and just believe what ever narrative you want to believe in.
@@MrRadialdrift well right now your not proving your knowledge. Right now you’re just some random troll on the internet yet to prove his “facts”. And yet I’m the lazy generation when you can’t even copy and paste a link.