Andrew Weissmann: The Supreme Court has given Trump the win

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 28. 02. 2024
  • The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid out a hearing schedule on former President Donald Trump's claims of presidential immunity that raises significant doubts that the election interference case against him will go to trial before the 2024 election. Former Justice Department prosecutor Andrew Weissmann discusses.
    » Subscribe to MSNBC: / msnbc
    Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
    MaddowBlog: www.msnbc.com/maddowblog
    ReidOut Blog: www.msnbc.com/reidoutblog
    MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.
    Connect with MSNBC Online
    Visit msnbc.com: www.msnbc.com/
    Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: link.msnbc.com/join/5ck/msnbc...
    Find MSNBC on Facebook: / msnbc
    Follow MSNBC on Twitter: / msnbc
    Follow MSNBC on Instagram: / msnbc
    Andrew Weissmann: The Supreme Court has given Trump the win
    #Trump #SupremeCourt #Politics

Komentáře • 2,9K

  • @jaygibson5057
    @jaygibson5057 Před 4 měsíci +54

    He wasnt charged with anything.

    • @ktm3850
      @ktm3850 Před 3 měsíci

      Meanwhile, Former Trump CFO Allen Weisselberg pleads guilty to perjury in ex-president’s civil fraud trial

    • @drgaryb13
      @drgaryb13 Před 3 měsíci

      You are so dense it isn't even worth explaining this to you. Dear God. HE WAS CHARGED WITH 91 FELONIES and the Supreme Court is preventing the trials from proceeding. Get your head out of your rear-end.

    • @luishon11
      @luishon11 Před 3 měsíci

      MSNBC are trash news

  • @Andy-ov9qd
    @Andy-ov9qd Před 4 měsíci +623

    "A communist system can be recognized by the fact that it spares the criminals and criminalizes the political opponent". - Alexander Solzhenitsyn.

    • @Kushmeiser003
      @Kushmeiser003 Před 4 měsíci +58

      Oh like the inner cities DAs do?

    • @ResistanceQuest
      @ResistanceQuest Před 4 měsíci +14

      I assume you equate "communist" with "unjust" and "corrupt," and you don't actually believe we live in anything resembling a communist system

    • @Bubble_0f_d00m
      @Bubble_0f_d00m Před 4 měsíci +40

      "Any fool can quote someone" - FuKuntt

    • @Clayton1968
      @Clayton1968 Před 4 měsíci

      @@FuKunttlike your girl Hitler with the women’s makeup?

    • @harveywilkinson2432
      @harveywilkinson2432 Před 4 měsíci +27

      "LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!" -- this your boy?

  • @skipperrussell2025
    @skipperrussell2025 Před 3 měsíci +41

    This is a win for the people.

  • @rickbaier1042
    @rickbaier1042 Před 3 měsíci +15

    They will never learn the more they attack him . The more evil they look

    • @jdcarling
      @jdcarling Před 3 měsíci +2

      And are

    • @maskedmarvyl4774
      @maskedmarvyl4774 Před 3 měsíci

      Yes, Rick the more Trump is held to account for the multiple felonies he committed, "the more evil they look".
      You live in a very small, dark place, don't you?
      Please learn basic grammar and punctuation.

  • @mikepatterson6416
    @mikepatterson6416 Před 4 měsíci +164

    “A republic, if you can keep it.” --Benjamin Franklin
    Witness our republic disintegrating after almost 250 years. It's history in the making.

    • @maharajjinkb7824
      @maharajjinkb7824 Před 4 měsíci

      Trump = the Republic.
      anti-Trump = anti-Republic.

    • @DennepeerRelaxation
      @DennepeerRelaxation Před 4 měsíci +16

      This should be the rallying cry for the election

    • @mikepatterson6416
      @mikepatterson6416 Před 4 měsíci +6

      @DennepeerRelaxation Indeed it should.

    • @Chuck_Hooks
      @Chuck_Hooks Před 4 měsíci +17

      NY Democrats are saying Build that Wall.
      What happened to those sanctuary cities?

    • @What_do_I_Think
      @What_do_I_Think Před 4 měsíci +1

      Democracy ends, when the good people stop fighting for it.

  • @benyomovod6904
    @benyomovod6904 Před 4 měsíci +161

    United Bananarepublic of America

    • @mikepatterson6416
      @mikepatterson6416 Před 4 měsíci +15

      The Billionaire Oligarchy of the United States of America. We're going to need a new flag.

    • @Joe-hz1nw
      @Joe-hz1nw Před 4 měsíci +24

      Absolutely. We have a corrupt vegetable as a president.

    • @mikepatterson6416
      @mikepatterson6416 Před 4 měsíci +7

      @Joe-hz1nw Indeed we did.

    • @Joe-hz1nw
      @Joe-hz1nw Před 4 měsíci +13

      @@mikepatterson6416 we DO right now. Wake up. Watch one full press conference and it’s clear as day to anyone with a functioning brain.

    • @mattt5006
      @mattt5006 Před 4 měsíci +4

      @@Joe-hz1nwThat leaves out mike.

  • @wheresthepudding946
    @wheresthepudding946 Před 4 měsíci +16

    These speakers sound like they have no souls. Absolutely zero bias🤷TRUMP 2024

  • @Unionjoint
    @Unionjoint Před 4 měsíci +117

    The whole world is depending on us to do the right thing and vote for normalcy.

    • @kiwihame
      @kiwihame Před 4 měsíci +4

      More true than you know.

    • @Herbeeboy
      @Herbeeboy Před 4 měsíci

      They don't want us to vote Commie?

    • @MA_808
      @MA_808 Před 4 měsíci +47

      Concur...Vote for Trump and not the Dempervs

    • @intheshell35ify
      @intheshell35ify Před 4 měsíci +7

      ​@@MA_808you need to crawl back into the cave you crawled out of in 2016.

    • @marylinharris1353
      @marylinharris1353 Před 4 měsíci +12

      @intheshell cry some more

  • @ShawnDevin
    @ShawnDevin Před 4 měsíci +135

    Not to mention, the Supreme Court refused to hear this case last year

    • @zyzzer
      @zyzzer Před 4 měsíci

      They refused to hear any case involving the 2020 election which led to Jan 6 which lead ultimately to here. It's time they end this dereliction of duty and fix what they've done.

    • @barbaraforde9213
      @barbaraforde9213 Před 4 měsíci

      If the Supreme Court had heard at least one of the 2020 Election Fraud cases, all of this nonsense we are dealing with now will not be going on. Fraud and corruption should have been stopped a long time ago by the Supreme Court but they turned a blind eye to the fraud and let this situation fester.

    • @msimon6808
      @msimon6808 Před 4 měsíci +8

      That would have been outside the regular calendar. You aren't rushing things for political motives, are you?

    • @barrymoore4470
      @barrymoore4470 Před 4 měsíci

      The MAGA justices were deliberately delaying to aid Trump.

    • @arturofuente4832
      @arturofuente4832 Před 4 měsíci

      The charges were phony then, and they are phony today.

  • @nancyroth
    @nancyroth Před 4 měsíci +127

    Alina Habba told everyone that the Supremes were doing this!!!!

    • @Teeveepicksures
      @Teeveepicksures Před 4 měsíci +20

      Because she knew. They're ALL in on it. Even Merrick Garland.

    • @liberalshaveitallbackwards4667
      @liberalshaveitallbackwards4667 Před 4 měsíci +6

      Calm down Karen.

    • @hammill444
      @hammill444 Před 4 měsíci +5

      Absolutely correct.@@Teeveepicksures

    • @ToniSammons-vc9wg
      @ToniSammons-vc9wg Před 4 měsíci +13

      Yes. She certainly did. And no one
      believed they could be so publicly dishonest.

    • @samearnest
      @samearnest Před 4 měsíci

      Your comment proves the ignorance of democrats 😂

  • @user-zd8nb4ko3s
    @user-zd8nb4ko3s Před 3 měsíci +9

    An insurrection is a violent uprising against an authority or government. It is different from a protest, which is a peaceful expression of disagreement or dissatisfaction. An insurrection usually involves a large group of people who use force or violence to try to overthrow or resist the government or its officials. Some examples of insurrections in history are the American Revolution, the French Revolution, and the Civil War.

    • @lindalarson1948
      @lindalarson1948 Před 3 měsíci

      Yes, interesting how mobs of arsonists and looters get called "mostly peaceful" protestors.

    • @olufunmiakadiri5290
      @olufunmiakadiri5290 Před 3 měsíci

      Like BLM violent riots

  • @denisebotko7456
    @denisebotko7456 Před 3 měsíci +5

    Weissmann never dissappoints with the deception b/s narratives..

  • @genovo
    @genovo Před 4 měsíci +47

    Every court in the United States and overseas is watching them do this. Aileen Cannon is not an outlier, she is the new template! 😢

    • @marylinharris1353
      @marylinharris1353 Před 4 měsíci +5

      Thank God for her.

    • @bidenisgarbage9428
      @bidenisgarbage9428 Před 3 měsíci

      Cry harder old man 😂

    • @Andy-ov9qd
      @Andy-ov9qd Před 3 měsíci

      How is that Trump derangement syndrome going? not very good...

    • @charlesvan13
      @charlesvan13 Před 3 měsíci

      They're watching your side turn the US into a banana republic. But failing because the SC is not in on your politicization of the courts.

    • @bidenisgarbage9428
      @bidenisgarbage9428 Před 3 měsíci

      America is sick of Democrats

  • @Danlmosher
    @Danlmosher Před 4 měsíci +81

    You just admitted the whole thing g is Lawfare! On its face that is disgraceful.

    • @ricklichau9176
      @ricklichau9176 Před 4 měsíci

      Lawfare, as in Trump is being wrongly targeted and he did not commit crimes? Yeah, right! And the moon is made of cheese and the earth is flat. A ridiculous and unpatriotic notion! MAGA: Mentally Abridged Gullible Anti-American

    • @scottcharney1091
      @scottcharney1091 Před 3 měsíci

      You didn't listen.

    • @jesse_-
      @jesse_- Před 3 měsíci

      Essentially, that’s exactly what they are doing. They haven’t even tried to hide the fact that they are intentionally going after Trump any way possible to keep him from becoming president. They said Trump would be corrupt, which Trump never was, yet they are exactly what they accused Trump of being. My vote is for trump and I’ll never vote democrat ever again for the rest of my life. I also will never vote for a RINO.

  • @Mike_257
    @Mike_257 Před 4 měsíci +50

    " The government of the people by the people and for the people shall not perish from the earth.." A. Lincoln.

    • @wlhgmk
      @wlhgmk Před 4 měsíci

      So sad. A death for democracy by 1000 cuts. Your are in a unique time in American history in which Lincoln will be proved to be wrong.

    • @undeadly1103
      @undeadly1103 Před 4 měsíci +1

      until DJT comes along and is so corrupt that it's not possible to hold him accountable for anything

    • @bidenisgarbage9428
      @bidenisgarbage9428 Před 3 měsíci

      Lock joe up for having secret documents

    • @tylerhansen99870
      @tylerhansen99870 Před 3 měsíci +2

      ​​@undeadly1103 keep coping you little fascists 😂

    • @e-spy
      @e-spy Před 3 měsíci

      and the republicans say, "hold my beer"...

  • @user-dv5ig4se6s
    @user-dv5ig4se6s Před 4 měsíci +39

    This argument should have been on the express to a trial so that voters have ALL the facts.

    • @FullContactDrummer
      @FullContactDrummer Před 4 měsíci

      They will never admit to it being based on the voting calendar. That would give the other side an argument for election interference. They could have brought the case a lot sooner to account for the delays.

    • @jrd8629
      @jrd8629 Před 4 měsíci

      We have the facts. The justice system has been politicized by leftist to such a point that they've broken fair and impartial court priceedings with their minions and henchman.

    • @Angiehere-1
      @Angiehere-1 Před 3 měsíci +5

      We have all the facts!

    • @Angiehere-1
      @Angiehere-1 Před 3 měsíci +2

      @biggame8927 Exactly!

    • @jamessachs77
      @jamessachs77 Před 3 měsíci

      LOL, videos like this SHOW US that the MSM (Mass pSychosis Media) and talking heads like Andrew Weissmann can't deal with truth and deliver facts! It goes against the brainwash.

  • @Historynerd42
    @Historynerd42 Před 4 měsíci +96

    The Supreme Court should have term limits.

    • @jstewart3476
      @jstewart3476 Před 4 měsíci +12

      Only if they have a conservative lean?

    • @HughJaxident67
      @HughJaxident67 Před 4 měsíci +1

      @@jstewart3476 Both Conservative and liberal. SCOTUS should be politically and ideologically as balanced as possible - no more than 5 justices that are either democrat or Republican.

    • @Chuck_Hooks
      @Chuck_Hooks Před 4 měsíci

      @@HughJaxident67 What? You don't like the Schumer solution?

    • @HughJaxident67
      @HughJaxident67 Před 4 měsíci +1

      @Hooks I like a solution that largely nullifies any potential political or ideological biases whether intended or not.

    • @Chuck_Hooks
      @Chuck_Hooks Před 4 měsíci

      @HughJaxident67 It's only a problem when the SC leans conservative.
      That's Schumer's argument, nullifying everything he had ever said previously.

  • @davekeyes5589
    @davekeyes5589 Před 4 měsíci +90

    Proof beyond a reasonable doubt that all that matters is having the judge(s) in your back pocket.

    • @carljeffery7914
      @carljeffery7914 Před 4 měsíci +13

      it's good to see a few fell out of Bidens stuffed full back pocket and came to their senses, every one knows it's get Trump at all costs with no evidence and a barrage of lies from msm

    • @jamessachs77
      @jamessachs77 Před 3 měsíci +3

      This is confirmation that the case is PURE political. All that is important is keeping Trump off the ballet

    • @bidenisgarbage9428
      @bidenisgarbage9428 Před 3 měsíci +6

      Cry harder 😂

    • @BitBuhkit
      @BitBuhkit Před 3 měsíci +4

      @@jamessachs77 yes, dump should never come near the Whitehouse again, for the sake of America...

    • @scottcharney1091
      @scottcharney1091 Před 3 měsíci

      @@carljeffery7914 No evidence? Seriously?

  • @rmitchell1
    @rmitchell1 Před 4 měsíci +5

    FJB!!!!!!

  • @susanne9602
    @susanne9602 Před 4 měsíci +79

    How ironic that Supreme Court justices who have lifetime appointments and no accountability will be deciding if a president has the same.

    • @hikingwiththedog6078
      @hikingwiththedog6078 Před 4 měsíci +10

      And when the Supreme Court decides in favor of your team, they're awesome, right?

    • @eldenringer6466
      @eldenringer6466 Před 4 měsíci

      I'm ok with life time but they must be given questions which if they deviate from at any time triggers a re election. So if they get the job on the claim theyd support e.g. Roe vs wade. And later overturn roe. That would cost them their lifetime appointments.
      And all courts should not be decided by presidents and they should always reflect the votes of the country.

    • @HughJaxident67
      @HughJaxident67 Před 4 měsíci +1

      The Supreme Court should always be as politically balanced as possible, never any more than 5 justices who are either democrat or Republican because like it or not, these Justices allow their political and ideological leanings impact on their rulings - shouldn't happen, but it does.

    • @jimjones3786
      @jimjones3786 Před 4 měsíci +1

      You're an example of why the 19th Amendment should be repealed.

    • @HughJaxident67
      @HughJaxident67 Před 4 měsíci

      @@jimjones3786 And you're an example of misogyny and wilful ignorance

  • @libbyworkman3459
    @libbyworkman3459 Před 4 měsíci +91

    The Supreme Court is clearly slow-walking the entire process.

    • @Chuck_Hooks
      @Chuck_Hooks Před 4 měsíci

      Better hurry and come up with another Russia collusion hoax

    • @Chuck_Hooks
      @Chuck_Hooks Před 4 měsíci +13

      Better hurry so the Cartels don't lose their ally in the WH

    • @antoniogarrett1176
      @antoniogarrett1176 Před 4 měsíci

      but the American People! Will not slow-walk our Votes in November! Andrew Weissmann: The Supreme Court has given Trump the win? in what? 2016 was the last time the GOP was relevant, if not True...Why haven't they won any elections since?👀The pathetic Supreme Court's Delay tactic for that Orange Clown is just that, a DELAY of the inevitability.

    • @swanandrew
      @swanandrew Před 4 měsíci

      Which only works to their detriment. If Trump wins in November, the Supreme Court is done,

    • @StromBugSlayer
      @StromBugSlayer Před 4 měsíci +3

      I'm also concerned about the wording of their announcement:
      “Whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office." They are only going to address his immunity for "official acts"?!? It seems to me most of his criminal efforts to overturn the election fell well outside anything related to his official duties. If the court only answers the question they have laid out, then they have focused only on his actions that could possibly be covered by immunity, and ignored the rest of his criminal actions, or they have extended "official acts" to cover anything he did while president. Neither would be a good thing.

  • @richard9480
    @richard9480 Před 4 měsíci +203

    If the Supreme Court in the UK had engaged in such shenanigans as your Supreme Court, heads would roll. This is a disgraceful manipulation of procedure and a middle finger to your great Constitution.

    • @brothertaro2008
      @brothertaro2008 Před 4 měsíci

      Obviously, the three judges appointed by Trump should recuse themselves. But they are way too corrupt for that.

    • @duanebidoux6087
      @duanebidoux6087 Před 4 měsíci

      I don't think reasonable Americans are really prepared to face this kind of evil. We just never have in the last 50 years. We've had two parties that believe in the Constitution. Now we have one. I suggest Europe pay attention and use this as a warning--it is the end of the America they knew. I was super happy seeing what France did yesterday by putting reproductive freedom into the French constitution. But, understand, the fight to save western civilization from fascism is likely to come down to Europe this time--without America's help.

    • @archades115
      @archades115 Před 4 měsíci +9

      The UK should not have a Supreme Court, as that was a transplant from the USA. And what good has it done?

    • @cameronbaker7959
      @cameronbaker7959 Před 4 měsíci +12

      You wanna know how i know you don’t understand US government

    • @yeame9163
      @yeame9163 Před 4 měsíci +10

      I’m crying I can’t stop my butt hurts. Oh no

  • @cecilelaforce3686
    @cecilelaforce3686 Před 4 měsíci +43

    If scotus wants to ask an academic question, they should ask how many $Millions of free trips and kick backs should scotus justices receive before being automatically impeached?

    • @hikingwiththedog6078
      @hikingwiththedog6078 Před 4 měsíci +2

      Let's take that further and dig into the campaign donations to each person in Congress and then line it up with their voting records.

    • @tylerhansen99870
      @tylerhansen99870 Před 3 měsíci +2

      ​@hikingwiththedog6078 this goes for both sides 😂 you know what's crazy is that if we're talking all politicans... Trump would be the only one left 😂

    • @antimediaman9354
      @antimediaman9354 Před 3 měsíci

      Everything you say is speculation. What do you know? nothing!! Looks like you are gonna have to actually win the election this time and not cheat like you have been.

    • @rebelx3680
      @rebelx3680 Před 3 měsíci

      That' not true. You robbed Trump of his money so now you still say that Trump is buying the justices. It doesn't matter to you if you defy logic. Your insane that's why.

    • @zackthebongripper7274
      @zackthebongripper7274 Před 3 měsíci

      Nah, the Clearance Thomas NOTHINGBURGER. Don't be an "INSURRECTIONIST" and accept the results leftoid.

  • @robertlotzer7627
    @robertlotzer7627 Před 4 měsíci +31

    “I’m very pessimistic!” Sounds very balanced. 😂.

  • @alanclark9691
    @alanclark9691 Před 4 měsíci +140

    Utterly, utterly depressing - not to say shameful.

    • @Chuck_Hooks
      @Chuck_Hooks Před 4 měsíci

      But Biden is the most popular president in history? Lol

    • @josephsanchez5987
      @josephsanchez5987 Před 4 měsíci

      Trump 2024 hahaha you dummycrat

    • @afridgetoofar1818
      @afridgetoofar1818 Před 4 měsíci +18

      But enough about Biden 😂

    • @Chuck_Hooks
      @Chuck_Hooks Před 4 měsíci +6

      Cartels thank you for your support.

    • @AndrewRodman1998
      @AndrewRodman1998 Před 4 měsíci +1

      TRUMP 2024 TRUMP 2028 TRUMP 2032 TRUMP 2036 TRUMP 2040 TRUMP 2044 TRUMP 2048 TRUMP 2052 TRUMP 2056 TRUMP 2060…. and so on until the year GOOGOLPLEX and to INFINITY ♾️ and beyond!! it is about time we finally crown Donald J Trump permanent KING and EMPEROR of the United States!! we must have him reign over the entire world, and all of humanity solely under his authoritarian control, for the rest of eternity!!!!

  • @ROOKTABULA
    @ROOKTABULA Před 4 měsíci +121

    Thank Mitch McSatanturtle and all the Never Hilary, 'undecided', and "didn't bother" voters in 2016 for this.

  • @kenle3419
    @kenle3419 Před 3 měsíci +4

    F/U morning joes! TRUMP 2024!!!

  • @Gwar-Deth
    @Gwar-Deth Před 3 měsíci +3

    trump for America Democrats for socialism do the right thing and vote for America

  • @jananders1351
    @jananders1351 Před 4 měsíci +78

    Well it appears that buying a Supreme Court is not too expensive after all.

    • @Chuck_Hooks
      @Chuck_Hooks Před 4 měsíci

      Calm down. You got this.
      Your guy let 8 million of his voters in.

    • @Chuck_Hooks
      @Chuck_Hooks Před 4 měsíci +3

      Calm down. You got this.
      8 million voters have been let in.

    • @markimel4947
      @markimel4947 Před 4 měsíci +2

      Buying the court? Lololol conspiracy much?

    • @jensschumacher9680
      @jensschumacher9680 Před 4 měsíci +1

      @@Chuck_Hooks sigh...so wrong on so many levels yet you probably think you are one of the truly smart ones

    • @Just-saying4
      @Just-saying4 Před 4 měsíci

      ​@@Chuck_Hooksexcept they have earlier this week been determined not eligible to vote in local elections.😊

  • @coltonius
    @coltonius Před 4 měsíci +79

    Legacy media’s gonna legacy media (fear monger). Remember kids, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Any immunity that applies to Trump will also apply to Biden!

    • @annalieff-saxby568
      @annalieff-saxby568 Před 4 měsíci

      Yes, but Biden is a decent man, who won't abuse his powers. Trump is a loose cannon. I don't think there's _anything_ he wouldn't do.

    • @pnwlevi4592
      @pnwlevi4592 Před 4 měsíci +18

      Yep it will also apply to the current president but the question with him is that his criminal activity occurred as a vice president which does not carry any sort of immunity

    • @getlostyougoofball
      @getlostyougoofball Před 4 měsíci

      ​@@pnwlevi4592it won't matter if the current president orders seal team 6 to take out the former president.

    • @JFergel
      @JFergel Před 4 měsíci +18

      @@pnwlevi4592 you dizzy from all that spin, little lady?

    • @sergioperez2771
      @sergioperez2771 Před 4 měsíci

      They’re never going to rule in favor of immunity. They have ZERO intent to do so. Delay, delay, delay - that’s the point. That’s the win they’re giving Trump. Unabashed malicious intent.

  • @wric01
    @wric01 Před 3 měsíci +1

    In short, it's a pause time-out to deter any prosecution distraction until after election.

  • @jamesprice4647
    @jamesprice4647 Před 4 měsíci +3

    What exactly will the arguments be? Why can't the court discuss them next week?

    • @thebull3206
      @thebull3206 Před 4 měsíci

      I think it's the difference between legitamite acts and illegitamite acts (like seal team 6)

    • @xxcelr8rs
      @xxcelr8rs Před 4 měsíci

      It is called prep research.Weismann is Putin's tool. lower political courts never followed Jefferson Adams and Hamilton. They clearly said Presidents have Immunity and Privilege. Remedy has always been Super Majority to first impeach in Senate. Shame on democrat tools of anarchy.

  • @Kopernicus67
    @Kopernicus67 Před 4 měsíci +28

    DC Circuit's decision was perfectly written. What more could SCOTUS add other than delay???

    • @user-vx7vi3vq1c
      @user-vx7vi3vq1c Před 4 měsíci +3

      “Perfectly written.” 😂 That means you agree with it.

    • @kellydoyle7833
      @kellydoyle7833 Před 4 měsíci +4

      ​@@user-vx7vi3vq1cthat means it's well written. And it is. We all know what's going on here.

    • @Just-saying4
      @Just-saying4 Před 4 měsíci +4

      ​@@kellydoyle7833 Well written? Did the judges even attach their names to the document?
      Sorry mulberry v Madison is pretty clear on presidential immunity.
      Granted they can overturn that precedent but I don't think anyone can live with that.
      Especially as that means all people who enjoy immunity have now lost it.

    • @user-vx7vi3vq1c
      @user-vx7vi3vq1c Před 4 měsíci

      @@kellydoyle7833 Yeah, let’s make an excuse for the dumb thing he said.
      Listen, you’re obviously a Biden voter which means you’ll say anything to defend a document written by a weaponized DOJ.

    • @davidbusen545
      @davidbusen545 Před 4 měsíci

      ​@@Just-saying4
      Immunity is one thing. If a law officer breaks your leg during a confrontation he has immunity from prosecution or civil suits. If he pulls his gun and shoots you because he doesn't like your looks that would be total immunity if he was allowed. Semantics Matter! Do you really want Donald Trump shooting someone on 5th avenue?

  • @lucyruby819
    @lucyruby819 Před 3 měsíci +4

    It's like a thief caught stealing and then appealing against the law for theft and judges saying, well let's see in your case the theft laws may have to be re interpreted. This will take time as we have to take a law that everyone else seems to understand the meaning of and see how, rather then apply the law, we can apply your upcoming cases to the law.

    • @lynnski-ex3zk
      @lynnski-ex3zk Před 3 měsíci

      Like FJB stealing😂

    • @korey420
      @korey420 Před 3 měsíci

      Your weak and pathetic rant hold no merit

  • @Gungybung
    @Gungybung Před 4 měsíci +1

    I am beyond disgusted.

  • @jollyjime2560
    @jollyjime2560 Před 3 měsíci +1

    Andrew!! I agree with you! This so depressing!!! Stress! Stress! Stress!

  • @S.Grundy
    @S.Grundy Před 4 měsíci +101

    The Supreme Court wasting time to humor the idea of absolute immunity implies that they believe someone is above the law. That idea is sickening, no matter who they rule in favor of at this point

    • @Chuck_Hooks
      @Chuck_Hooks Před 4 měsíci +12

      I am so glad I listened to this Administration and got 8 boosters

    • @Lameducks
      @Lameducks Před 4 měsíci +7

      Bold of you to think the law matters to these people in any other capacity than for them to abuse it for their own gain.

    • @cs03033
      @cs03033 Před 4 měsíci +10

      @@Chuck_HooksI'm so glad you're in this thread responding to anything but the subject matter of the video

    • @Chuck_Hooks
      @Chuck_Hooks Před 4 měsíci

      @cs03033 Get your 10th booster and you'll get over it.

    • @Chuck_Hooks
      @Chuck_Hooks Před 4 měsíci +7

      @@cs03033 Get your 10th booster and calm down.

  • @Mst-bh9ti
    @Mst-bh9ti Před 4 měsíci +6

    Weissman is not a critical thinker, and has a history of prosecutorial misconduct, so I'd be pretty wary of his opinions. It's not a win for Trump in the Colorado case. It's simply following the Constitution, particularly due process.

  • @albertvonhugenstien4971
    @albertvonhugenstien4971 Před 3 měsíci

    I'm so happy you got such an impartial guest to review this.

  • @nancy8145
    @nancy8145 Před 4 měsíci +3

    The court is saying we know this is wrong but there is nothing you can do about it. We are the law of the land💩🤮🤬😡🤧💩🤮🤬😡🤧💩💩

    • @antimediaman9354
      @antimediaman9354 Před 3 měsíci

      nope

    • @antimediaman9354
      @antimediaman9354 Před 3 měsíci

      You are in the land of the fantastical but not the land of the educated regetfully for you.

    • @tomreedyjr3631
      @tomreedyjr3631 Před 3 měsíci

      Amazing how Tge Law Of The Land gave wome. The right to abortion was brilliant , but when a 9- 0 comes up on legal elections, you are up in arms..

  • @good_vibes_20
    @good_vibes_20 Před 4 měsíci +14

    "someone who is innocent would want to clear their name" that's some high faith in the justice system and assuming bad actors are not involved. Any sane person would want their case thrown out. Get real. Banana Republic and dangerous DOJ

    • @derekbrandell8520
      @derekbrandell8520 Před 4 měsíci

      When you are watching you brain rot on fox are those comment sections filled with people who hate it also? I ask because since I hate fox I would never be stupid enough to go watch anything they post, let alone comment on their video and push their engagement higher with youtubes bots. I mean that would be like giving something money while wishing they would go bankrupt. Just silly kids behavior.

    • @hernantuquero5969
      @hernantuquero5969 Před 4 měsíci +2

      I DON’T CARE JUST FIND ME 12,700 VOTES!😂

    • @cryhavoc6106
      @cryhavoc6106 Před 3 měsíci +1

      ​@hernantuquero5969 "you ain't black"

    • @Gandalf98
      @Gandalf98 Před 3 měsíci +3

      A black man in a 1950s Mississippi court room would have had a better chance of getting justice than Donald Trump in Washington D.C. in 2024.

    • @BitBuhkit
      @BitBuhkit Před 3 měsíci

      @@Gandalf98 the pos dump deserves everything that is happening to him, biggest criminal to ever disgrace the WH...

  • @gbontempi7905
    @gbontempi7905 Před 4 měsíci +6

    Why didnt they bring these lawfare cases to court three years ago?

    • @PissedOffCanuck
      @PissedOffCanuck Před 4 měsíci

      Because they are only doing it because he decided he was going to run for President again. Had he not they never would have done ANY of this. It's really that simple.

    • @PissedOffCanuck
      @PissedOffCanuck Před 4 měsíci +4

      Because they were waiting to see if he was going to run again. If he hadn't none of this would be happening. It's really that simple.

    • @gbontempi7905
      @gbontempi7905 Před 4 měsíci +1

      @@PissedOffCanuck of course, if he would have gone to work and done a talk show with Rachel Maddow everything would have been forgotten..

    • @hernantuquero5969
      @hernantuquero5969 Před 4 měsíci +2

      They were still gathering evidence and studying the case. It takes a while.

    • @PissedOffCanuck
      @PissedOffCanuck Před 4 měsíci

      @@hernantuquero5969 lol 3yrs? Yeah okay. It's being done now because they are scared sh|tless

  • @cgi9498
    @cgi9498 Před 4 měsíci +12

    Andrew, I’m sorry Trump did not “illegally stay in office”.
    He left when he was required to.
    What is wrong with these people?

    • @alteredcatscyprus
      @alteredcatscyprus Před 4 měsíci

      They’re out of their minds.

    • @thebull3206
      @thebull3206 Před 4 měsíci

      Right - he's just promoting his book to the trump haters after all.

  • @joshgroom8421
    @joshgroom8421 Před 4 měsíci +1

    Watching from Ireland- shocking.

  • @NDARYBC
    @NDARYBC Před 4 měsíci +5

    LOCK & LOAD AMERICA,lock & load.

  • @dumpd6227
    @dumpd6227 Před 4 měsíci +20

    We all heard DJT grovel to the supreme court to take this case, and his lawyer Alina Habba said DJT’s Supreme Court picks must take this case , and they did. This is an embarrassment. If this doesn’t galvanize Democrats to go out and vote in large numbers against this atrocity, then nothing will.

    • @user-zs2je9ey7t
      @user-zs2je9ey7t Před 4 měsíci +3

      😂😂😂😅😂

    • @Jeweldoeshair
      @Jeweldoeshair Před 4 měsíci

      That sentiment is exactly why we have a senile Genocidal maniac in the White House . Anyone but Biden

    • @BigK-uo8eh
      @BigK-uo8eh Před 4 měsíci

      Your entire belief in democrats is disgraceful.

    • @decuevas244
      @decuevas244 Před 4 měsíci

      Hi. I'm hoping you can help me out. I know t r u mp is same bird different wing and that our country is just taking our money and our rights. Just on the fact that illegals are being brought in and given more rights and things than we are shows our government is bust. They're getting the right to vote and from just one place 10,000 a month. Add they get at least 2200 a person from social security. They have free health care and everything free yet people aren't rising up . My question is it doesn't matter if you like the person or not but why aren't people like you upset? Do you understand that if he loses the citizens lose more? Do you not know that. These charges are totally against the constitution? How? Well he did a real estate maneuver that is used by many and got a loan then paid ut back with interest so there wasn't even a victim. Could you tell me what he did wrong?

    • @Delta2Oscar
      @Delta2Oscar Před 4 měsíci

      When trying to abreviate a name makes more trouble than just saying it.😅

  • @BridgKay
    @BridgKay Před 4 měsíci +2

    He was never CONVICTED a of an INSURRECTION!!! Wake up people! 😂

  • @user-zg4kl9qj8w
    @user-zg4kl9qj8w Před 4 měsíci +6

    It’s hard to prove your innocence when everyone in charge wants him in jail. I hope these attorneys and judges get what’s coming to them when Trump wins in 2024!!

  • @HD46409
    @HD46409 Před 4 měsíci +19

    As a FedSoc member, I'm embarrassed for SCOTUS. The court is clearly playing in the political realm by the way they are doing this. I think we need to really think about adding 9 more justices. There at least 5 of them that are out of control. It's shameful....

    • @user-je7ot6ju9r
      @user-je7ot6ju9r Před 4 měsíci +6

      5 votes and it's over.. Need a crying towel?

    • @davidbusen545
      @davidbusen545 Před 4 měsíci +2

      9 more would give us a total of 18 which could possibly lead to a tie. Also can you imagine the amount of time it would take for anything to get through the courts. 13 Federal districts should equal 13 supreme Court justices.

    • @jameshebert1875
      @jameshebert1875 Před 4 měsíci +3

      ​@davidbusen545 they don't think. They just want thier way and if it doesn't go thier way then "we need term limits" "we need more judges"

    • @UniqueBreakfastTaco
      @UniqueBreakfastTaco Před 4 měsíci +2

      when you cant win, change the rules.

    • @MICHAEL-vy3ch
      @MICHAEL-vy3ch Před 4 měsíci +3

      @@davidbusen545 That's actually not a bad idea, and it makes perfect sense to have 13 Justices. Of course, by tradition when the court has been expanded by Congress, any appointments wait until the next President to appoint them and the next Senate to give them hearings.

  • @manifest5564
    @manifest5564 Před 4 měsíci +3

    Frivolous as it can get. The argument should have ended in the Judge Chutkan's courtroom. "SCOTUS wanted to pin down this issue", my teddy bear doesn't believe in that.

  • @aprilmilnes3583
    @aprilmilnes3583 Před 4 měsíci +14

    How does his legal team even get the audacity to be able to "schedule" his trials?? I have only been to court for really minor things, and i just got a letter in the mail telling me that i had to be there on this date at this time.... no one ever let me schedule anything😂

    • @timothycase5227
      @timothycase5227 Před 4 měsíci +3

      That’s because you simply don’t matter 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @aprilmilnes3583
      @aprilmilnes3583 Před 4 měsíci

      @@timothycase5227 lol good one😆

    • @scottwilliams1533
      @scottwilliams1533 Před 4 měsíci

      Because u didn’t PAY A LAWYER. public defenders don’t count.

    • @UniqueBreakfastTaco
      @UniqueBreakfastTaco Před 4 měsíci

      maybe if you dont understand civics, you shouldnt be voting.

    • @jrd8629
      @jrd8629 Před 4 měsíci

      It's baffling that ppl still report for jury duty.. unless it's certified mail, don't respond to it. They sent out 200 envelopes to ppl. If you respond back that's how they get you. But if you don't, they have no proof that you ever received the mail becaise...it isn't certified.

  • @allenkranawetter9482
    @allenkranawetter9482 Před 4 měsíci +7

    God bless the supreme Court for doing the right thing

  • @paulinelobbestael3206
    @paulinelobbestael3206 Před 4 měsíci +48

    Vote 💙…We the people need to take back our Democracy at the ballot box!

    • @nancyroth
      @nancyroth Před 4 měsíci

      Sweets, we have bigger problems. This is really bad for us. The Dems just had a target put on their backs, including we the people.😢

    • @SurprisedCroissant-lm2ct
      @SurprisedCroissant-lm2ct Před 4 měsíci +11

      MAGA!!!! ACTUALLY SAVE DEMOCRACY 👌

    • @Andy-ov9qd
      @Andy-ov9qd Před 4 měsíci

      ...but Democracy is being destroyed by the Democrats daly, Democrats are FASCIST Party today and accusing Republicans of tyranny, what an irony.

    • @X2LR8
      @X2LR8 Před 4 měsíci +10

      It's the opposite! To preserve our democracy, we must vote for Trump and the GOP!

    • @higherpriorities
      @higherpriorities Před 4 měsíci +12

      MAGA we are a Constitutional Republic 🎉

  • @alcrow1458
    @alcrow1458 Před 4 měsíci +2

    Harlan crows and Ginny blows.

  • @user-hc2uc2cc4j
    @user-hc2uc2cc4j Před 4 měsíci +7

    It is quite enjoyable watching Weissman melt down.

  • @jerry-richard4611
    @jerry-richard4611 Před 4 měsíci +12

    Prosecuting the leading opposing candidate in an election year, scheduling the case for super Tuesday [and failing], then complaining about it when it did not go your way, by Weissman, Mister 'Russiagate' himself; Don't blame Scotus, blame Garland;

    • @CharlieFlask
      @CharlieFlask Před 4 měsíci +1

      Who is prosecuting an opposing candidate?

  • @ADAMSIVES
    @ADAMSIVES Před 3 měsíci

    AAARGH! When's it all going to end?!

  • @selma5885
    @selma5885 Před 4 měsíci +2

    Bring the case to trial! why wait?

  • @gregjennings9442
    @gregjennings9442 Před 4 měsíci +3

    Well, the people are going to have to take this back…at the polling both. People should vote like the democracy depends on it…because it does.

    • @lindalarson1948
      @lindalarson1948 Před 3 měsíci

      If the states manage to take the leading candidate off the ballots, thereby denying over half of the voters the right to choose the candidate they prefer, then we lost our "democracy" already.

  • @24BROWNIES
    @24BROWNIES Před 4 měsíci +13

    If weissman is unhappy then I'm smiling

  • @richardriedy1230
    @richardriedy1230 Před 4 měsíci +4

    Facts favor Pelosi as guilty for staging this event.

  • @The_Cali_Dude_88
    @The_Cali_Dude_88 Před 3 měsíci

    When the true legal minds of America 'melt'

  • @chantalbanon7185
    @chantalbanon7185 Před 4 měsíci +2

    FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!

  • @kathleenpolly2219
    @kathleenpolly2219 Před 4 měsíci +1

    Let the trial go on even if it’s right up to elections!

  • @rroibns888
    @rroibns888 Před 4 měsíci +1

    The request of immunity “for violations of law and criminal activities” is acknowledgment of guilt!
    "Absolutely" No court is needed!!!

    • @xxcelr8rs
      @xxcelr8rs Před 4 měsíci

      Weismann is Putin's tool. lower political courts never followed Jefferson Adams and Hamilton. They clearly said Presidents have Immunity and Privilege. Remedy has always been Super Majority to first impeach in Senate. Shame on democrat tools of anarchy.

  • @patrickmurphy7485
    @patrickmurphy7485 Před 3 měsíci +1

    If someone tells me they’re a republican I just walk away the second after they say it. Now if someone tells me they are a lawyer or judge I do the same thing without saying anything.

  • @jwiese100
    @jwiese100 Před 4 měsíci +2

    A win? For now, maybe. But note Trump isn't just making the argument himself, but Biden as well.

    • @adotjon78
      @adotjon78 Před 4 měsíci

      What other types of crimes do you want old yeller to commit next?

  • @engineered-mind
    @engineered-mind Před 3 měsíci

    The entire system is a joke

  • @AliceBowie
    @AliceBowie Před 3 měsíci +1

    The people obsessing over Trump always look so weird.

  • @jessesalinas8534
    @jessesalinas8534 Před 3 měsíci +3

    If you listen Closely, you can actually hear democrats crying. 😂

  • @matthewhodge6374
    @matthewhodge6374 Před 4 měsíci +1

    "How dare they not throw Trump in jail after I worked for 3 years on a hoax in order to throw Trump in jail!"

  • @tommygunn1521
    @tommygunn1521 Před 4 měsíci +2

    I love the sound of democrat tears

  • @gulfislander11
    @gulfislander11 Před 4 měsíci +1

    Trump just got kicked off the Illinois ballot by a judge. I wonder if scotus will take 2 months to hear that one?

  • @user-cj7dv2kc6d
    @user-cj7dv2kc6d Před 4 měsíci +17

    Scotus is corrupt

  • @Kobsidian
    @Kobsidian Před 3 měsíci

    I don't understand why the trial cannot go forward, pending the Supreme Court's deliberation and ruling. The simple fact that he is running again should make it essential that things move forward. If it's ultimately decided that he is immune, (which I can't believe will be the case), the trial stops at that moment, or whatever judgement it has generated is voided.

  • @davidmoorman344
    @davidmoorman344 Před 3 měsíci

    Thanks I needed a good laugh 😂😅

  • @jessekloess7437
    @jessekloess7437 Před 3 měsíci +1

    Excuse me, pardon me, just going to sprinkle a little salt right here. ✌️

  • @EducatingDims247
    @EducatingDims247 Před 4 měsíci +1

    Really it is the constitution that has given President Trump the win. 😆😆🤦‍♀🤦‍♀

  • @Hank-the-Writer
    @Hank-the-Writer Před 4 měsíci

    We need to remember that SCOTUS is not here for the country. They're here for themselves.

  • @jesseblount5948
    @jesseblount5948 Před 3 měsíci +1

    Where's msnbc coverage of Biden at the failed border.

  • @romeoward1794
    @romeoward1794 Před 4 měsíci +3

    Only idiots don't give Trump the win😅
    Go Trump Twenty24 👏

    • @barrysmith4863
      @barrysmith4863 Před 4 měsíci

      In actual fact the term is IDIOTS FOR TRUMP !

  • @marshwetland3808
    @marshwetland3808 Před 3 měsíci +1

    Weissman looks unhappy and quite sad today.

  • @sandrastjohn-qr5tc
    @sandrastjohn-qr5tc Před 4 měsíci +6

    American oligarchs behind SC gave trump the delay. Just like they gave the religious right (oligarchs) Dobbs

    • @tylerhansen99870
      @tylerhansen99870 Před 3 měsíci

      Gave power back to the states to make decisions, cry about it little fascist 😢😂

  • @davidk6271
    @davidk6271 Před 4 měsíci

    I don’t get it. Why does it make a difference at what point he goes to court?

    • @scottcharney1091
      @scottcharney1091 Před 3 měsíci

      Because if he should get elected, and there isn't a verdict before he's inaugurated, he can simply have DOJ abandon the case, pardon himself, etc.

  • @nw9353
    @nw9353 Před 4 měsíci

    Crickets from congress. What a surprise.

  • @ryanc6878
    @ryanc6878 Před 4 měsíci +6

    Trump 2024

  • @raymondmichielinijr5490
    @raymondmichielinijr5490 Před 4 měsíci

    Can’t believe this info Supreme Court has no spine on this decision

  • @sandraelliott6982
    @sandraelliott6982 Před 4 měsíci

    This is reprehensible and disturbing in so many ways

  • @sailor67duilio27
    @sailor67duilio27 Před 4 měsíci

    I have lost faith in US law, where is the justice?

  • @sharonannrees2824
    @sharonannrees2824 Před 3 měsíci

    It’s a moot point since anyone who is innocent would not need immunity. Duh

  • @kh485
    @kh485 Před 3 měsíci

    Trump or no Trump we’re still going to get fluoridated water and chemtrails. It’s the same thing.😂

  • @brandonharbin406
    @brandonharbin406 Před 4 měsíci +2

    Trump 2024 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • @robertjohnson9884
    @robertjohnson9884 Před 3 měsíci

    WE the PEOPLE!

  • @benlagging2265
    @benlagging2265 Před 3 měsíci

    Very good. They should have heard the case with 18 states in 2020 as well. We would not even be here right now.

  • @user-wh9vy2fx8y
    @user-wh9vy2fx8y Před 3 měsíci +2

    45 will be 47

  • @janmac218
    @janmac218 Před 4 měsíci

    Who were the SCOTUS judges that voted for this?

  • @delxinogaming6046
    @delxinogaming6046 Před 4 měsíci

    This was Garlands fault for waiting two years before charging. What a waste.

  • @timothymccarthy8044
    @timothymccarthy8044 Před 4 měsíci

    A fair jury in DC? Not likely.

  • @barbaramaroney6890
    @barbaramaroney6890 Před 3 měsíci

    Lost my faith in our government.....

  • @frederickdaroza4963
    @frederickdaroza4963 Před 4 měsíci +5

    The win with a lot of help from Merrick Garland and his apologists.