Survey of Early Egyptian Christianity | The Bisrat Podcast w/ Dr. Vince Bantu

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 7. 09. 2024
  • On this episode, Dr. Vince Bantu discussed the history of Christianity in Egypt.
    Support the mission and vision of Jude 3 Project here: www.jude3proje...
    Grab our curriculum here: www.jude3proje...
    Take an online course that will help you know what you believe and why here: learn.jude3pro...

Komentáře • 56

  • @Jude3Project
    @Jude3Project  Před 2 lety +3

    You can get Dr. Bantu’s book here: www.amazon.com/Multitude-All-Peoples-Christianitys-Missiological/dp/0830851070/ref=nodl_

    • @nikinai4374
      @nikinai4374 Před rokem

      1) VATICAN I is CONSTANTINIAN ROMAN CATHOLICISM which came out of MITHRAISM that was called the SYNAGOGUE of SATAN because they practiced HUMAN, CHILD "sacrificial" SON-WORSHIP-Ezek 8:14-17. >>Romanism CREATED its own sects of ISLAM like MYSTIC SUFISM
      2) VATICAN II is Esau is Edomite-Herodian religion is Charismatic Catholicism which is typified as "JEZEBEL" who TAUGHT the APOSTOLIC CHURCH Spiritual fornication and the Synagogue of Satan's doctrine of crucifixion Christology NICOLAITAN doctrine of SALVATION by "sacrificial" SON-WOSHIP which came from the MITHRAIC SYNAGOGUE of SATAN. They went on to CREATE,
      >> ISLAM and
      >>the COUNTER REFORMATION Prosperity gospel EVANGELICAL PROTESTANTISM like CRYSTAL(ball) CATHEDRAL of Katherine Kuhn, Bill Hyball, Kenneth Copeland, and Benny Hill
      3) ORTHODOX and COPTIC CHURCH is APOSTATE APOSTOLIC CHURCH version of Christianity which CREATED,
      >>MAINSTREAM PROTESTANTISM like the ANGLICAN, PRESBYTERIAN, METHODIST and the BAPTIST church
      4) There was NO CLASSISM in BANTU ITURI so-called "Africa" by ROmans, and there was NO COLOURISM untill the COLONIAL RAPES began to produce LIGHT SKIN children who were given ARAB and ROMAN privileges of the colonizers making LIGHT SKIN a colour of PRIOVILEGE. However, even today, there is NO PRIORITIZATION of LIGHT SKIN in BANTU ITURI except in relation to COLONIAL DISCOURSES.
      >>The rural BANTU has NO NOTION of LGHT SKIN as BETTER, because for BANTU people LIGHT SKIN was associated with the COLONIZERS children and therefore as children of INFIDELITY who gave birth to ALBINO children whom EVERY BANTU FEARED to have.BANTU ITURI was always A NUMERICALLY SINGULAR MONOTHEISTIC belief system NO DIFFERENT from the HEBREW conception of a SINGULAR DEITY who is the CREATOR-just like Deut 6:4; Exod 3:14; Isaiah 44:8, Isaiah 44:24; Prov 8:22-30ff; Rev 17 The BAntu THEN and NOW did not and DO NOT believe in the SEPARATION of BODY and SOUL, the person LIVED as a WHOLE BEING whose BREATH was from the CREATOR and when that BREATHE EXPIRED it did so as GAS runs out of a TANK< leading to DEATH. Therefore the DEAD was considered like AN EMPTY GAS TANK, without BREATH hence DEAD, and NO PART of it was CONSCIOUS in ANY SENSE. However the BANTU believed in the RESURRECTION "IRIÚKO" of the WHOLE PERSON like a GAS TANK refilled with GAS!
      5) Supposed "African spirituality" is a product of ARAB and INDIAN TRADER cultures which believed in the SEPARATION of the BODY and SOUL giving rise to theri belief in GHOSTS, which they then WORSHIPED as "acncestral spirits" These "ancestral demon spirits" were taught to BANTU people of coastal and SAHEL(Sahara)regions who traded with the Indo-Arabs, that is why they RETAINED the ARABIC terms like MAJINI(in the WATER(maji); MAMI(mother)-WATA(water); VODOO which is a corruption of the original meaning of COMMEMORATION of the TRULY DEAD forefathers, but NOT as GHOSTS or SPIRITS but in the same way as HEBREWS remember theri FOREFATHERS)-ORISHAS are HINDU demons which were given a NIGERIAN ACCENTED pronunciation. These were accepted originally by DARKSKIN MIXED race children of INDO-ARAB children with BANTU peoples as their FATHERS or MOTHERS religions just like MAJINI and MAMI WATER were INDO-ARAB demon JINIS...and NOT BANTU ancestors by any definition, thats why the names are INDO-ARAB.
      6) BANTU NEVER could believe in TRINITY or ARIANISM which are considered POLYTHEISTIC beliefs by TRUE BANTU people because there is NO NOTION Of a PLURAL "God" in the BANTU languages across the continent have NO CONCEPT of GOD as a PLURAL. The PRIEST and the COMMUNITY BELIEF akin to a "church" was RESPECTED but NOT as DEITIES even in the "gods"(Psa 82:6=John 10:34) just as HUMANS who did or FAILED to DO theri MORAL DUTY. Therefore TINIT-ARAINISM TRIUNISM and ARAINISM is completely LINGUISTICALLY, EPITTEMOLOGICALLY and ONTOLOGICALLY ANTITHETICAL to BANTU belief about the CREATOR. CHRISTIANITY and ISLAM corrupted the BELIEF in the HEBRAIC TYPE numerically singular BANTU MONOTHEISM. To the BANTU the CREATOR is SPIRIT, but they were and are still willing to see how the SPIRIT could MANIFEST in the form of A MAN because they also believed ANGELS helped them by MANIFESTING as HUMANS or A CREATURE known to humans. So, WITCHCRAFT was just THAT, demon worship and that is why its practitioners of so-called "ancestor" worship or veneration was KNOWN to be DEMON WORSHIP!-called KUCHEZA(Gúcietha)-NGOMA(the completely UNCONSCIOUS sleep of the DEAD) meaning NOT as SWAHILI explains as PLAYING(Kucheza) DRUMS(NGOMA) which is TOTALLY WRONG, but to PLAY(gúthaka) WITH, or properly to LOOK FOR(gúcietha) DEMONS who were known to be CONSCIOUS SPIRITS that resided in the EARTH. This is why CHRISTIANITY and ISLAM are really HEATHEN religions as far as BANTU BELIEF system in a numerically singular MONOTHEISM goes.
      The DAYS of the WEEK are all heathen NAMES;
      >>the god SUN day
      >>the goddess MOON day
      >>TUE-the god TIU's day
      >>the day of WED/DINGS day
      >>the god THOR'S day
      >>the god FRIGIUS day
      >>the planet SATURNS day
      BANTU days of the WEEK are
      >>wa BERE -DAY 1----------counting: ÍMúe
      >>wa KEERÍ-DAY2 ----------counting:Igírí
      >>wa GATATÚ=DAY 3----------counting:Ithatú
      >>wa KAANA=day 4----------counting:Inya
      >>wa GATANO=day 5----------counting:Ithano
      >>wa GATADATÚ=day 6----------counting:Ithathatú
      >>wa MÚGÚAJA=SABBATH----------counting:Múgúa ja
      >>wa KANAANA----------counting:Inyanya
      >>wa KEEDA----------counting:Keeda
      >>wa IKÚMI----------counting:Ikúmi
      NOTE: MÚGÚJA as the SABBATH was distinguished from the other terms
      all of which begin with "I or Í(ae)"because it is a SPECIAL INJUCTION to KEEP THE LAW of the MOST HIGH on that PARTICULAR SEVENTH DAY, along with KEEDA which is an INJUCTION to PROCREATE, within NINE(Keeda) MONTHS thereby ENSHRINING the FIRST TWO COMMANDS in GENESIS 1 and 2 to PROCREATE and KEEP THE SABBATH.
      Múfgúaja the sense of SHABAH7650-strongs concordance-a day which when the community was REMINDED to KEEP ALL THE LAWS of the MOST HIGH, lest one should FALL OUT OF THE LAW by neglecting the VOWS of the MOST HIGH, therefore a MEMORIAL DAY for the LAWS of the MOST HIGH thru REST. In BANTU culture if one BROKE PARENTAL, FAMILY of TRIBAL LAW it was said that person FELL OUTSIDE the house of the ONE who gave the command NOT TO do something or other, AND DIED, hence Múgúja is related to DEATH because of the CURSE Of DISOBEDIENCE

  • @bthom5670
    @bthom5670 Před 2 lety +17

    Thank you for sharing and doing this great work Dr. Bantu! Recently I had a hard conversation with a childhood friend because he believed Christianity was a white man's religion and refused to accept historical facts that showed otherwise. Most of the truths that I shared with him, I learned from resources like this video. I appreciate you and the Jude 3 Project's labor in this area of Apologetics. I needed this encouragement today! 👊🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿

    • @DJ-uc8mk
      @DJ-uc8mk Před 2 lety +1

      Can you please share those truths with me because I feel the same way as your buddy

    • @bthom5670
      @bthom5670 Před 2 lety +1

      One of those truths is. The church of Alexandria in Egypt was founded in 49 AD. The Atlantic slave trade did not start until the 16th century. So Africans believe In Christ thousands of years before they were slaves in America. Ethiopia's Coptic Church was established in the fourth century. It is one of the oldest Christian churches in the world. Ethiopia as a country has never been colonized. So these Africans believe in Christianity without any European oppression or influence.
      I hope this helps!

  • @uvic4027
    @uvic4027 Před 2 lety +3

    Thank you, Dr. Bantu, for your godly labors. I’ve studied at three different seminaries, and I never heard any professor or read any text that brought the Christian history of our great Continent like you have. I’m almost inspired to start another degree! Blessings, my brother!

  • @marquescameron2459
    @marquescameron2459 Před 2 lety +2

    Thanks for sharing as an African I definitely would like to learn about our African Christian faith.

  • @Explorenz4
    @Explorenz4 Před 2 lety +4

    Ethiopia was one of the first Christian countries in the world, having officially adopted Christianity as the state religion in the 4th century. Ethiopia was the only region of Africa to survive the expansion of Islam as a Christian state. Europe at that time were the feudal backward continent! You doing good brother! You are opening fellow black peoples eyes who think that Christianity is the white religion.

    • @whatshatnin4572
      @whatshatnin4572 Před 2 lety

      Ethiopia was not a Christian nation until a Caucasian man by the name of St. Frumentius introduced the Ethiopians to bible god. Every scenario involving a Christian Institution in African Nations always has some European missionary or slave master introducing the bible and bible characters to said African nation.. Ethiopia did not start building churches, drawing images of Jesus or writing bibles until a Caucasian man pushing the European Christian Church to the Ethiopian bible. Whenever bible god talks to white people before African people, its just another indication that this religion is the white mans religion

    • @Explorenz4
      @Explorenz4 Před 2 lety +2

      @@whatshatnin4572 you don't know the bible and the Ethiopian Christian history!! Come to Ethiopia and see in your own naked eyes to see the black Jesus and marry paints in sasint lalibela! European started paintings quite God Jesus and marry the 15th century . But we Ethiopian started paintings in the 5th century! If you don't want to accept Christianity it's up to you, but don't tell me it's a white man's religion! Christianity started jn Isreal and Isreal is not a white country!

    • @whatshatnin4572
      @whatshatnin4572 Před 2 lety

      @@Explorenz4 I do understand the bible and i do understand reality.. I understand what the bible says about one of the disciples going to Ethiopia in the first century.. But i also understand real history.. And the real history books have dates.... not talking snakes.
      Just like you said you wont find any early 1st century paintings of Jesus or any other biblical characters in Ethiopia. No Christian Churches were being built, no Jesus paintings or drawings were being made and no bibles were being written in Ethiopia after Mark allegedly brought the gospels to Ethiopians. But history tells us that the Ethiopian bibles start being written, Ethiopian Christian Churches start being built, and depictions of jesus started being drawn soon after St. Frumentius introduced Christianity to the Brothas. Why weren't the Ethiopians doing this right after Mark gave them the gospel.. Why did it take the Ethiopians to get a Saint to get them to create Christian memorabilia.
      And making Jesus black dont mean that Christianity is not the white mans religion. That is a small way of looking at things.. What makes Christianity the white man's religion because Zimbabwe, Guyana, Brothas in the Congo, in America, Haiti, Jamaica, South Africa, Brazil, DR, Nigeria, Cuba, Ethiopia, Egypt and every other African nation of people received their bible from Europeans.
      You say Israel is where Christianity started, but you cannot find any completed biblical literature written in Hebrew or Aramaic that predates the Greek. And no Hebrew or Jew ever introduced an African nation to Christianity.. This dont have nothing to do with Israel or the color of jesus.. This has to do with how did Africans get the information.. Why didnt bible god ever sit down with the African and introduce himself to the African.. Why is the European always the one telling the African about bible god?

    • @thedude9941
      @thedude9941 Před 2 lety

      @@whatshatnin4572 St. Frumentius was a Phonecian Christian missionary not a European, and even Tertullian and Augustine were said to be of Phonecian and Berber descent so definitely not white guys, and when the Bible mentioned Mark going to Ethiopia it was referring to Nubia.

    • @whatshatnin4572
      @whatshatnin4572 Před 2 lety

      @@thedude9941 St. Frumentius was not a European. You are correct He was a different type of Caucasian. But St. Frumentius represent a European institution. Anytime you see the word St at the beginning of a name we all know that represents Rome or the Catholic church.
      You talk about Mark goin into Nubia according to the bible. We should never use books that have talking animals as our primary source of history. History books have dates... Not talking snakes
      The problem is that you wont find ANY Nubian bibles or Nubian Christian Churches until after some European missionary or colonizer brings Christianity to the Nubian.

  • @BrandonMcCrae
    @BrandonMcCrae Před 2 lety +1

    Thoroughly enjoyed this presentation Dr. Bantu!!!

  • @koryeewyatt4264
    @koryeewyatt4264 Před 2 lety +1

    The book is number one on my birthday list.. My wife knows I have to have it... thanks for the lesson

  • @timnel333
    @timnel333 Před 2 lety +2

    Man I love this. I am most definitely following The Bisrat Podcast.

  • @phillipking4621
    @phillipking4621 Před 2 lety +5

    I love this already and I’m already about 10 minutes in, is it possible for you all to point me to the resources and evidence that this wonderful brother pointed out?

  • @pboxtm8012
    @pboxtm8012 Před 2 lety +2

    Thank you for your work! I hope we'll have a survey of Central and West African Christianity

    • @whatshatnin4572
      @whatshatnin4572 Před 2 lety

      That aint gone happen. These videos are designed to distract us of our own introduction to Christianity because we all know how silly it is to serve a god that talked to your slave masters before it talked to you

    • @ivorysmith239
      @ivorysmith239 Před 2 lety +2

      We can say whatever we want but death is certain and if you reject Jesus as Lord and Savior you will burn in Hell for all eternity.
      )But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, (B)their portion will be in (C)the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is (D)the second death.” (Revelation 21:8)
      This will be your eternal destiny if you reject God and want to continue your sin. We can prove and have discussions all we want but the truth is you just don’t want to believe it. God is not playing games. Either Repent of your sins and accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior or spend an eternity burning in the Lake of Fire. Oh and btw, if they Bible was written by White men as you say, then they are also held accountable and they also need to Repent and accept Christ or go to Hell so there is no expections

    • @whatshatnin4572
      @whatshatnin4572 Před 2 lety

      @@ivorysmith239 Only in mythology/religion must you believe to get good things and to keep from harm's way. Often times the kids are told that they must believe in Santa to get gifts and if they dont believe they dont get any gifts. Adults are told to believe in jesus or they will go to hell and if they do believe they go to heaven.
      History does not work that way. History is not accepted via belief and faith.. History is accepted through knowledge and facts. No one is going to tell you that you are going to experience a super natural punishment if you dont know who the first president was.
      There is no evidence of any eternal lake of fire. That is Greek mythology. When do black folks STOP believing in mythology and start knowing history.
      All you doing is pushing fear.. Healthy adults should not fear things that have no evidence of existence.. Do you have any evidence that supports the existence of a hell? Of course you dont.. Neither did the Greeks.
      Again this is a fact based conversation.. The video is based on facts.. sort of... This is not about mythology and fear. Black Christians quick to talk about early Ethiopian Christianity and going to hell... But yall never want to talk about early West/Central Africa Christianity.

  • @TrustNotMyHeart
    @TrustNotMyHeart Před 2 lety +1

    This was awesome. Gotta listen to it several times because it was rich.

  • @PMAN41
    @PMAN41 Před 2 lety +1

    Great teaching and so much needed

  • @Dizzeeyout
    @Dizzeeyout Před 2 lety +1

    Tuning in from the UK

  • @DWill-if4xh
    @DWill-if4xh Před 2 lety +2

    This was great

  • @pheldonmajors2999
    @pheldonmajors2999 Před 2 lety

    Thank you Dr. Bantu for sharing!

  • @bluefig797
    @bluefig797 Před 2 lety

    Excellent teaching. 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾

  • @HashimWarren
    @HashimWarren Před 2 lety +3

    This is so helpful - and for free??? Just became a monthly sponsor!

    • @Jude3Project
      @Jude3Project  Před 2 lety +1

      We appreciate your support!

    • @nikinai4374
      @nikinai4374 Před rokem

      1) VATICAN I is CONSTANTINIAN ROMAN CATHOLICISM which came out of MITHRAISM that was called the SYNAGOGUE of SATAN because they practiced HUMAN, CHILD "sacrificial" SON-WORSHIP-Ezek 8:14-17. >>Romanism CREATED its own sects of ISLAM like MYSTIC SUFISM
      2) VATICAN II is Esau is Edomite-Herodian religion is Charismatic Catholicism which is typified as "JEZEBEL" who TAUGHT the APOSTOLIC CHURCH Spiritual fornication and the Synagogue of Satan's doctrine of crucifixion Christology NICOLAITAN doctrine of SALVATION by "sacrificial" SON-WOSHIP which came from the MITHRAIC SYNAGOGUE of SATAN. They went on to CREATE,
      >> ISLAM and
      >>the COUNTER REFORMATION Prosperity gospel EVANGELICAL PROTESTANTISM like CRYSTAL(ball) CATHEDRAL of Katherine Kuhn, Bill Hyball, Kenneth Copeland, and Benny Hill
      3) ORTHODOX and COPTIC CHURCH is APOSTATE APOSTOLIC CHURCH version of Christianity which CREATED,
      >>MAINSTREAM PROTESTANTISM like the ANGLICAN, PRESBYTERIAN, METHODIST and the BAPTIST church
      4) There was NO CLASSISM in BANTU ITURI so-called "Africa" by ROmans, and there was NO COLOURISM untill the COLONIAL RAPES began to produce LIGHT SKIN children who were given ARAB and ROMAN privileges of the colonizers making LIGHT SKIN a colour of PRIOVILEGE. However, even today, there is NO PRIORITIZATION of LIGHT SKIN in BANTU ITURI except in relation to COLONIAL DISCOURSES.
      >>The rural BANTU has NO NOTION of LGHT SKIN as BETTER, because for BANTU people LIGHT SKIN was associated with the COLONIZERS children and therefore as children of INFIDELITY who gave birth to ALBINO children whom EVERY BANTU FEARED to have.BANTU ITURI was always A NUMERICALLY SINGULAR MONOTHEISTIC belief system NO DIFFERENT from the HEBREW conception of a SINGULAR DEITY who is the CREATOR-just like Deut 6:4; Exod 3:14; Isaiah 44:8, Isaiah 44:24; Prov 8:22-30ff; Rev 17 The BAntu THEN and NOW did not and DO NOT believe in the SEPARATION of BODY and SOUL, the person LIVED as a WHOLE BEING whose BREATH was from the CREATOR and when that BREATHE EXPIRED it did so as GAS runs out of a TANK< leading to DEATH. Therefore the DEAD was considered like AN EMPTY GAS TANK, without BREATH hence DEAD, and NO PART of it was CONSCIOUS in ANY SENSE. However the BANTU believed in the RESURRECTION "IRIÚKO" of the WHOLE PERSON like a GAS TANK refilled with GAS!
      5) Supposed "African spirituality" is a product of ARAB and INDIAN TRADER cultures which believed in the SEPARATION of the BODY and SOUL giving rise to theri belief in GHOSTS, which they then WORSHIPED as "acncestral spirits" These "ancestral demon spirits" were taught to BANTU people of coastal and SAHEL(Sahara)regions who traded with the Indo-Arabs, that is why they RETAINED the ARABIC terms like MAJINI(in the WATER(maji); MAMI(mother)-WATA(water); VODOO which is a corruption of the original meaning of COMMEMORATION of the TRULY DEAD forefathers, but NOT as GHOSTS or SPIRITS but in the same way as HEBREWS remember theri FOREFATHERS)-ORISHAS are HINDU demons which were given a NIGERIAN ACCENTED pronunciation. These were accepted originally by DARKSKIN MIXED race children of INDO-ARAB children with BANTU peoples as their FATHERS or MOTHERS religions just like MAJINI and MAMI WATER were INDO-ARAB demon JINIS...and NOT BANTU ancestors by any definition, thats why the names are INDO-ARAB.
      6) BANTU NEVER could believe in TRINITY or ARIANISM which are considered POLYTHEISTIC beliefs by TRUE BANTU people because there is NO NOTION Of a PLURAL "God" in the BANTU languages across the continent have NO CONCEPT of GOD as a PLURAL. The PRIEST and the COMMUNITY BELIEF akin to a "church" was RESPECTED but NOT as DEITIES even in the "gods"(Psa 82:6=John 10:34) just as HUMANS who did or FAILED to DO theri MORAL DUTY. Therefore TINIT-ARAINISM TRIUNISM and ARAINISM is completely LINGUISTICALLY, EPITTEMOLOGICALLY and ONTOLOGICALLY ANTITHETICAL to BANTU belief about the CREATOR. CHRISTIANITY and ISLAM corrupted the BELIEF in the HEBRAIC TYPE numerically singular BANTU MONOTHEISM. To the BANTU the CREATOR is SPIRIT, but they were and are still willing to see how the SPIRIT could MANIFEST in the form of A MAN because they also believed ANGELS helped them by MANIFESTING as HUMANS or A CREATURE known to humans. So, WITCHCRAFT was just THAT, demon worship and that is why its practitioners of so-called "ancestor" worship or veneration was KNOWN to be DEMON WORSHIP!-called KUCHEZA(Gúcietha)-NGOMA(the completely UNCONSCIOUS sleep of the DEAD) meaning NOT as SWAHILI explains as PLAYING(Kucheza) DRUMS(NGOMA) which is TOTALLY WRONG, but to PLAY(gúthaka) WITH, or properly to LOOK FOR(gúcietha) DEMONS who were known to be CONSCIOUS SPIRITS that resided in the EARTH. This is why CHRISTIANITY and ISLAM are really HEATHEN religions as far as BANTU BELIEF system in a numerically singular MONOTHEISM goes.
      The DAYS of the WEEK are all heathen NAMES;
      >>the god SUN day
      >>the goddess MOON day
      >>TUE-the god TIU's day
      >>the day of WED/DINGS day
      >>the god THOR'S day
      >>the god FRIGIUS day
      >>the planet SATURNS day
      BANTU days of the WEEK are
      >>wa BERE -DAY 1----------counting: ÍMúe
      >>wa KEERÍ-DAY2 ----------counting:Igírí
      >>wa GATATÚ=DAY 3----------counting:Ithatú
      >>wa KAANA=day 4----------counting:Inya
      >>wa GATANO=day 5----------counting:Ithano
      >>wa GATADATÚ=day 6----------counting:Ithathatú
      >>wa MÚGÚAJA=SABBATH----------counting:Múgúa ja
      >>wa KANAANA----------counting:Inyanya
      >>wa KEEDA----------counting:Keeda
      >>wa IKÚMI----------counting:Ikúmi
      NOTE: MÚGÚJA as the SABBATH was distinguished from the other terms
      all of which begin with "I or Í(ae)"because it is a SPECIAL INJUCTION to KEEP THE LAW of the MOST HIGH on that PARTICULAR SEVENTH DAY, along with KEEDA which is an INJUCTION to PROCREATE, within NINE(Keeda) MONTHS thereby ENSHRINING the FIRST TWO COMMANDS in GENESIS 1 and 2 to PROCREATE and KEEP THE SABBATH.
      Múfgúaja the sense of SHABAH7650-strongs concordance-a day which when the community was REMINDED to KEEP ALL THE LAWS of the MOST HIGH, lest one should FALL OUT OF THE LAW by neglecting the VOWS of the MOST HIGH, therefore a MEMORIAL DAY for the LAWS of the MOST HIGH thru REST. In BANTU culture if one BROKE PARENTAL, FAMILY of TRIBAL LAW it was said that person FELL OUTSIDE the house of the ONE who gave the command NOT TO do something or other, AND DIED, hence Múgúja is related to DEATH because of the CURSE Of DISOBEDIENCE

  • @wordassassinhebrews4125
    @wordassassinhebrews4125 Před 2 lety +1

    Dr. Vincent Bantu excellent teaching no one would even think of calling Christianity a "white Religion " Today if more Egyptian , Ethiopian and Nubian Christians had spread the gospel to the rest of Africa . Still history testified to the ancient churches of Africa and shows that Christianity was never solely " White religion ".

  • @AverageIsFailure
    @AverageIsFailure Před 2 lety

    Been loving this!

  • @eastsideapologetics6147
    @eastsideapologetics6147 Před 2 lety +1

    Keep it up!

  • @pheldonmajors2999
    @pheldonmajors2999 Před 2 lety

    I am in Indiana & look forward to dates at UMI!

  • @afropanamerican
    @afropanamerican Před 2 lety

    Thank you!

  • @thomasbrisbane7122
    @thomasbrisbane7122 Před 2 lety

    Brilliant mind that Dr. Bantu….

  • @HashimWarren
    @HashimWarren Před 2 lety

    32:15 inspiring to learn about Shenoute and his conviction on social justice

  • @jaygresh
    @jaygresh Před rokem

    Not a bad presentation and very worth watching. However, being an Eastern Orthodox (Antiochian) Deacon, I have a different take on the Council of Chalcedon. I hope viewers will look at both sides of this horrible chapter in African Church history and appreciate the fact that many Eastern and Oriental Orthodox Christians have been building bridges even during the times of troubles.

  • @Andrea-lt6rp
    @Andrea-lt6rp Před rokem

    My brother I hope that you are Oriental Orthodox. God bless.

  • @Corinthians-iz2ep
    @Corinthians-iz2ep Před 2 lety

    🔥🔥🔥

  • @marquescameron2459
    @marquescameron2459 Před 2 lety

    How can I learn or get more information on African Christianity?

  • @anthonyparish3034
    @anthonyparish3034 Před 2 lety +1

    Informative though I am a monotheistic christian

    • @nikinai4374
      @nikinai4374 Před rokem

      AMAN! AMAN! AMAN! AMAN!-AFFIRM the TRUTH!
      1) VATICAN I is CONSTANTINIAN ROMAN CATHOLICISM which came out of MITHRAISM that was called the SYNAGOGUE of SATAN because they practiced HUMAN, CHILD "sacrificial" SON-WORSHIP-Ezek 8:14-17. >>Romanism CREATED its own sects of ISLAM like MYSTIC SUFISM
      2) VATICAN II is Esau is Edomite-Herodian religion is Charismatic Catholicism which is typified as "JEZEBEL" who TAUGHT the APOSTOLIC CHURCH Spiritual fornication and the Synagogue of Satan's doctrine of crucifixion Christology NICOLAITAN doctrine of SALVATION by "sacrificial" SON-WOSHIP which came from the MITHRAIC SYNAGOGUE of SATAN. They went on to CREATE,
      >> ISLAM and
      >>the COUNTER REFORMATION Prosperity gospel EVANGELICAL PROTESTANTISM like CRYSTAL(ball) CATHEDRAL of Katherine Kuhn, Bill Hyball, Kenneth Copeland, and Benny Hill
      3) ORTHODOX and COPTIC CHURCH is APOSTATE APOSTOLIC CHURCH version of Christianity which CREATED,
      >>MAINSTREAM PROTESTANTISM like the ANGLICAN, PRESBYTERIAN, METHODIST and the BAPTIST church
      4) There was NO CLASSISM in BANTU ITURI so-called "Africa" by ROmans, and there was NO COLOURISM untill the COLONIAL RAPES began to produce LIGHT SKIN children who were given ARAB and ROMAN privileges of the colonizers making LIGHT SKIN a colour of PRIOVILEGE. However, even today, there is NO PRIORITIZATION of LIGHT SKIN in BANTU ITURI except in relation to COLONIAL DISCOURSES.
      >>The rural BANTU has NO NOTION of LGHT SKIN as BETTER, because for BANTU people LIGHT SKIN was associated with the COLONIZERS children and therefore as children of INFIDELITY who gave birth to ALBINO children whom EVERY BANTU FEARED to have.BANTU ITURI was always A NUMERICALLY SINGULAR MONOTHEISTIC belief system NO DIFFERENT from the HEBREW conception of a SINGULAR DEITY who is the CREATOR-just like Deut 6:4; Exod 3:14; Isaiah 44:8, Isaiah 44:24; Prov 8:22-30ff; Rev 17 The BAntu THEN and NOW did not and DO NOT believe in the SEPARATION of BODY and SOUL, the person LIVED as a WHOLE BEING whose BREATH was from the CREATOR and when that BREATHE EXPIRED it did so as GAS runs out of a TANK< leading to DEATH. Therefore the DEAD was considered like AN EMPTY GAS TANK, without BREATH hence DEAD, and NO PART of it was CONSCIOUS in ANY SENSE. However the BANTU believed in the RESURRECTION "IRIÚKO" of the WHOLE PERSON like a GAS TANK refilled with GAS!
      5) Supposed "African spirituality" is a product of ARAB and INDIAN TRADER cultures which believed in the SEPARATION of the BODY and SOUL giving rise to theri belief in GHOSTS, which they then WORSHIPED as "acncestral spirits" These "ancestral demon spirits" were taught to BANTU people of coastal and SAHEL(Sahara)regions who traded with the Indo-Arabs, that is why they RETAINED the ARABIC terms like MAJINI(in the WATER(maji); MAMI(mother)-WATA(water); VODOO which is a corruption of the original meaning of COMMEMORATION of the TRULY DEAD forefathers, but NOT as GHOSTS or SPIRITS but in the same way as HEBREWS remember theri FOREFATHERS)-ORISHAS are HINDU demons which were given a NIGERIAN ACCENTED pronunciation. These were accepted originally by DARKSKIN MIXED race children of INDO-ARAB children with BANTU peoples as their FATHERS or MOTHERS religions just like MAJINI and MAMI WATER were INDO-ARAB demon JINIS...and NOT BANTU ancestors by any definition, thats why the names are INDO-ARAB.
      6) BANTU NEVER could believe in TRINITY or ARIANISM which are considered POLYTHEISTIC beliefs by TRUE BANTU people because there is NO NOTION Of a PLURAL "God" in the BANTU languages across the continent have NO CONCEPT of GOD as a PLURAL. The PRIEST and the COMMUNITY BELIEF akin to a "church" was RESPECTED but NOT as DEITIES even in the "gods"(Psa 82:6=John 10:34) just as HUMANS who did or FAILED to DO theri MORAL DUTY. Therefore TINIT-ARAINISM TRIUNISM and ARAINISM is completely LINGUISTICALLY, EPITTEMOLOGICALLY and ONTOLOGICALLY ANTITHETICAL to BANTU belief about the CREATOR. CHRISTIANITY and ISLAM corrupted the BELIEF in the HEBRAIC TYPE numerically singular BANTU MONOTHEISM. To the BANTU the CREATOR is SPIRIT, but they were and are still willing to see how the SPIRIT could MANIFEST in the form of A MAN because they also believed ANGELS helped them by MANIFESTING as HUMANS or A CREATURE known to humans. So, WITCHCRAFT was just THAT, demon worship and that is why its practitioners of so-called "ancestor" worship or veneration was KNOWN to be DEMON WORSHIP!-called KUCHEZA(Gúcietha)-NGOMA(the completely UNCONSCIOUS sleep of the DEAD) meaning NOT as SWAHILI explains as PLAYING(Kucheza) DRUMS(NGOMA) which is TOTALLY WRONG, but to PLAY(gúthaka) WITH, or properly to LOOK FOR(gúcietha) DEMONS who were known to be CONSCIOUS SPIRITS that resided in the EARTH. This is why CHRISTIANITY and ISLAM are really HEATHEN religions as far as BANTU BELIEF system in a numerically singular MONOTHEISM goes.
      The DAYS of the WEEK are all heathen NAMES;
      >>the god SUN day
      >>the goddess MOON day
      >>TUE-the god TIU's day
      >>the day of WED/DINGS day
      >>the god THOR'S day
      >>the god FRIGIUS day
      >>the planet SATURNS day
      BANTU days of the WEEK are
      >>wa BERE -DAY 1----------counting: ÍMúe
      >>wa KEERÍ-DAY2 ----------counting:Igírí
      >>wa GATATÚ=DAY 3----------counting:Ithatú
      >>wa KAANA=day 4----------counting:Inya
      >>wa GATANO=day 5----------counting:Ithano
      >>wa GATADATÚ=day 6----------counting:Ithathatú
      >>wa MÚGÚAJA=SABBATH----------counting:Múgúa ja
      >>wa KANAANA----------counting:Inyanya
      >>wa KEEDA----------counting:Keeda
      >>wa IKÚMI----------counting:Ikúmi
      NOTE: MÚGÚJA as the SABBATH was distinguished from the other terms
      all of which begin with "I or Í(ae)"because it is a SPECIAL INJUCTION to KEEP THE LAW of the MOST HIGH on that PARTICULAR SEVENTH DAY, along with KEEDA which is an INJUCTION to PROCREATE, within NINE(Keeda) MONTHS thereby ENSHRINING the FIRST TWO COMMANDS in GENESIS 1 and 2 to PROCREATE and KEEP THE SABBATH.
      Múfgúaja the sense of SHABAH7650-strongs concordance-a day which when the community was REMINDED to KEEP ALL THE LAWS of the MOST HIGH, lest one should FALL OUT OF THE LAW by neglecting the VOWS of the MOST HIGH, therefore a MEMORIAL DAY for the LAWS of the MOST HIGH thru REST. In BANTU culture if one BROKE PARENTAL, FAMILY of TRIBAL LAW it was said that person FELL OUTSIDE the house of the ONE who gave the command NOT TO do something or other, AND DIED, hence Múgúja is related to DEATH because of the CURSE Of DISOBEDIENCE

  • @Sweetdification
    @Sweetdification Před 2 lety

    IBA Oba Oludumare Yah Osha Qedawami King of Kings 👑 Lord of Lord's Ist Conquering lion 🦁 and Tribe Of Judah Jesu

  • @DavidIstre
    @DavidIstre Před 2 lety

    Some critiques as I'm listening:
    First, the author of Mark was likely not an apostle.
    "Although the Gospel of Mark is anonymous, there is a strong and clear early tradition that Mark was its author and that he was closely associated with the apostle Peter, from whom he obtained his information about Jesus. The earliest reference is found in the church historian Eusebius, who quoted from a lost work (Exegesis of the Lord’s Oracles) written by Papias, bishop of Hierapolis, about A.D. 140. Papias, in turn, quotes the Elder, probably the elder John, referred to elsewhere by Eusebius. The quotation in Eusebius follows:
    'The Elder said this also: Mark, who became Peter’s interpreter, wrote accurately, though not in order, all that he remembered of the things said or done by the Lord. For he had neither heard the Lord nor been one of his followers, but afterwards, as I said, he had followed Peter, who used to compose his discourses with a view to the needs of his hearers, but not as though he were drawing up a connected account of the Lord’s sayings. So Mark made no mistake in thus recording some things just as he remembered them. For he was careful of this one thing, to omit none of the things he had heard and to make no untrue statements therein.' (Ecclesiastical History 3.39.15)
    This tradition suggests several important points about Mark’s Gospel: (1) behind Mark is the eyewitness account and apostolic authority of Peter; (2) Mark did not write his account about Jesus in chronological sequence; (3) nevertheless Mark was careful to record accurately what Peter said."
    Wessel, W. W. (1984). Mark. In F. E. Gaebelein (Ed.), The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Matthew, Mark, Luke (Vol. 8, pp. 605-606). Zondervan Publishing House.
    Sufficient reason exists to identify this "Mark" with the "John Mark" we see referenced in Acts and by both Peter and Paul in their epistles. And it is John Mark who history credits with establishing the church in Egypt:
    "Nothing else is known of Mark, but many ancient traditions credit him with the founding of the Christian church in Alexandria. The Paschal Chronicle, a seventh-century Alexandrian history, says that he was martyred there. His bones are said to be buried in St. Mark’s Basilica in Venice. The legend is that they were smuggled out of Muslim-controlled Alexandria in 830 ce by being hidden in a basket of salted pork that was being shipped to Venice. Since Muslims will not touch pork, they did not inspect the basket. Historians believe that this story may well be true, and it is very possible that the bones actually are those of Mark, venerated and preserved by the early Alexandrian Christians."
    Losch, R. R. (2008). In All the People in the Bible: An A-Z Guide to the Saints, Scoundrels, and Other Characters in Scripture (p. 275). William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

    • @whatshatnin4572
      @whatshatnin4572 Před 2 lety

      Yeah. Mark probably never existed.

    • @samueljennings4809
      @samueljennings4809 Před rokem

      The author of Mark, John Mark, was recorded by second century church writer (I forget which one ) as the travelling partner of Peter, and he got his information from the recollection of Peter shortly before his death. So that’s how Mark got the information and wrote them down.

    • @samueljennings4809
      @samueljennings4809 Před rokem

      @@whatshatnin4572 based on what conclusion? Why make up someone unremarkable completely from scratch when you could claim that your gospel was written by a more famous apostle like Andrew or Thomas, like what the Gnostics did? The writer of the 4 gospels were acknowledged unanimously in the late first/early second century as Matthew/Mark/Luke/John, when if they were anonymous, some other names would have been suggested as their authors. But this debate never happened, unlike what happened with the gnostic gospels who tried to add the names of more famous apostles as their writers. Everyone in the early church, from orthodox to modalists to Ebionites, all different theologies, all acknowledged the same writers as the gospel writers.
      Hard to imagine how that would happen if people just made up their authors from scratch or threw some name onto an anonymous writing.

    • @whatshatnin4572
      @whatshatnin4572 Před rokem

      @@samueljennings4809 when I get to my computer I can show you christian sources who say that Matthew and Mark are anonymous authors. And these names were attributed to the Gospels almost 200 years after the life of Jesus by some Greek guy. I forget his name too.
      But you can look up the word pseudepigrapha and I'm sure the gospels will pop up

    • @nikinai4374
      @nikinai4374 Před rokem

      what MATTERS? what they WROTE or WHO they were?--is that not tantamount to VENERATION of, if not "PERSONALITY CULT" WORSHIP ?