If everybody wants to know why this Vox video is poorly done, uses flawed logic and basically just said "Nuh uh" to per capita statistics, this is because this video is one big EUPHEMISM for something else..
A study of all dog bite related Fatalities that occured during the ten year period 2000- 2009 were described in atleast one media account with a single breed descriptor, potentially implying that the dog was pure breed (Patronek et. al 2013) However, approximately 46% of the dogs are mixed breed ( American Veterinary Medical Association) And it seemed unlikely to the authors that pure breed dogs would be disproportionately represented among the dogs involved in these incidents. Further, in only 18% of the cases were the author's able to make valid determination of the dog involved was a member of a distinct recognized breed (Patronek et al 2013) Nevertheless unverified reports of the dog breeds involved in serious and fatal incidents have been used to develop opinions regarding percieved danger of different breeds (voith et al, 2009, Voith et al 2013)
4:18 Isn't that still relevant? A chihuahua bites you and you need a band aid, but a large dog like a pit bull bites you and you need serious reconstructive surgery.
YES. Terrible argument they made. Even if pitbulls aren’t naturally more likely to bite than other dogs, the veterinarian fact that when they not only have among the strongest bites but literally were breed to not stop biting. Very few large dogs have that trait and that’s what makes them dangerous. If they snap, they have a deadly bite and often won’t stop biting for a long time
@@Homer-OJ-Simpson But if that were true, then wouldn't the worst reputation go to the dog with the worst bite? Of all the dog breeds bred to bite hard and not let go, why is it only the pitbull-group breeds that are villainized like this?
@@rachellee2680 True, almost all large dog breeds should be considered dangerous. Chow chow's are one breed that's not talked about enough despite how strong and aggressive they are.
@@rachellee2680 Pitbulls belong to the terrier group for which the overwhelming majority are smaller than the average dog and possess that tenacity to keep biting prey (high prey drive). Pitbulls are a problem in this way because they are large muscular dogs - bred with tenacity of a terrier. Most popular large dogs are not terriers nor belong to the terrier group in any capacity.
Have to say, this is one of the worst researched Vox videos I’ve ever seen. No diving into the statistics? No distinctions between minor bits and major injuries? Yes, raw dog bite statistics are nearly meaningless, but that doesn’t mean statistics about the injuries in general are meaningless. Yes, you have to scale the numbers based on population distribution, yes there are pitfalls in interpreting the statistics, but the whole point of an outfit like Vox is to find an expert and ask THEM about it, not just write it off casually. No mention about dogs being bred for specific purposes? There’s enough holes in this piece I could use it to strain pasta.
they did find an expert opinion about the dog bite statistics: the american veterinary association. they said dog bite statistics are fundamentally flawed. how can you possibly then find meaning and truth in those statistics?
Small dog bite statistics dont matter in the context of this argument because even if they are more aggressive than pitbulls (honestly they are imo), the level of harm caused by a small dog attack is almost nothing. If pitbulls represent 70% of the attacks by larger dog breeds, then that is statistically significant and we can say that, given a dog is a larger breed, pitbulls demonstrate far more violent tendencies. Hand waving away pitbull statistics by pointing out that we dont really measure small dog bite occurences doesnt work because that isnt relevant to the conversation.
yeah if we were observing both pit bulls and rottweilers you’d see that those two breeds alone make up a the majority of bites resulting in injury i don’t know how people can look at that and think the data is actually completely wrong and that pit bulls aren’t aggressive. they are, and they deal damage with their aggression
"It's not the dog, it's the owner," is a canard I hear often. The problem is that not every dog owner can be an animal behavior specialist. Many dogs will be aggressive with other dogs or anyone they perceive as a threat to their territory. While most people can restrain smaller breeds, many owners of large and strong dog breeds aren't physically capable of restraining their animal. The dog may be perfectly placid around the owner and their family, but watch out when the dog perceives a threat.
I think it's relevant because if you want to argue that a dog is aggressive due to its breeding then showing that small dogs, that aren't bred for aggression, are in fact aggressive means that it might not be breed related. If you ban dogs because of their potential harm, then all large dogs should be banned.
It's not because of "potential harm" it's because of decades of correlated statistics that show the breed umbrella that includes PB, Staffy, Boxer etc.. is vastly overrepresented in the severe injury, maiming and death numbers when talking about dog attacks. There are more Golden's, Labs etc.. than bully breeds but they don't cause any significant amount of fatal attacks. Bully's do.
If everybody wants to know why this Vox video is poorly done, uses flawed logic and basically just said "Nuh uh" to per capita statistics, this is because this video is one big EUPHEMISM for something else..
in my opinion they even misrepresented the study from denmark: the study admits that some breeds have been shown to cause more injuries than others, even when considering that they are overrepresented in the data set. Also the "ban" meant 2 breeds became illegal to own and 11 more just needed to be muzzeled in public. when you consider that 67% of injuries are caused in private, the legislature hat no effect on these cases, but they are counted nonetheless. The study is focussed on the reports of a singular hospital as well, so no country wide data. all in all the data doesnt really support the conclusion of the study since they generalize from a single hospitals data to the country wide effectiveness of legislature and this is being generalized even more by vox, saying these "results" would be comparable to different legislature in a different country (actual ban of all pit bull related breeds)
@@whiskeywolfgang no, because whining and throwing a hissy fit claiming that per capita statistics are wrong because "err it count other factors too!" is objectively awful and the most obvious example of twisting a narrative.
@@karan_karan_karan”the Stats aren’t reliable because people keep misidentifying pit bulls. Anyway, here’s our employee who intentionally misrepresents her pit bull to improve her dog’s image.”
While I agree with you for the most part, small breed dogs DO and HAVE caused serious injuries and even fatalities. Children are attacked the most. The case that immediately comes to mind is in 2001 when a Pomeranian attacked and killed a 6-month baby.
4:18 what a terrible video. Even if pitbulls aren’t naturally more likely to bite than other dogs, the very fact that when they not only have among the strongest bites but literally were breed to not stop biting. Very few large dogs have that trait and that’s what makes them dangerous. If they snap, they have a deadly bite and often won’t stop biting for a long time
There are statistics, perhaps not in the US. The UK had 10 deadly dog attacks in 2022, six of them involved an American Bully XL (a pitbull type of dog, bred to be bigger than your standard one) while making 6% of the dogs population in the UK (in europe we need to register our dogs). Also, a poorly trained yorki bite, will end with me getting a tetanus vaccine injection in the worst case. A poorly trained pitbull bite will end in dead or lost limbs. BTW, tell my own dog pitbulls are not dangerous after one just broke her jaw with a single bite. Resulting in a long recovery and the permanent lost of 4 of her teeth.
@@asambatyon so sorry to hear about your pet and wishing you and her both the best. There are people coming around to the fact that these dogs don't belong in our society.
the specific breeds ban is not just "those breeds are more aggressive" but is also "those breeds have stronger bites and can deal much more damage than other dogs"
Literally. "We should all be able to own lions" vibes. If every lion owner was perfectly responsible and could guarantee that their lion wasn't a public safety risk, sure! I'd love to live in that fantasy world too, lions are cool!
@@A38 Ah, yes, lions, those animals that are notoriously difficult to identify by the general populace and are such popular pets that their numbers make them statistically more likely to bite but not necessarily more aggressive by nature. Just like pit bulls.
Well, actually they showed that the data that exists is not viable. Except the one data from Denmark, where they showed, that banning pit bulls did not change dog bite statistics. So maybe you should watch again.
4:00 Does society give golden instincts to retrieve or a Aussie the instinct to herd or do they just do it? Man did create the pit bull and we did it for the purpose to fight. Why can we acknowledge that other breeds were created for specific jobs but blind ourselves to the “work” of the pit bull, executing on the purpose that we created them for. This is a savior complex.
Remember when that pitbull bit off a kid's hand? The kid stuck it through the fence into the neighbor's yard and the pitbull that lived there just tore if off. The internet was full of pitbull apologists who tried to blame it on the child.
@@millerrepin4452 Everything. This is a piece of cherry picked information trying to whitewash pitbulls, which is no wonfer knowing Vox was recently purchased by the same media company as The Dodo, which regularly whitewashes "pitties", nevermind these dogs snap at people unprovoked on a regular basis.
@millerrepin4452 quite literally everything. everything in this video can be refuted. look up dog bit fatality statistics. look into the history of the breed; they were never "nanny dogs", this was a myth started in the 1970s.
Aside from the FACT that pit bulls are among the least aggressive dog breeds, which you seem to acknowledge, they are also the most abused. Animal abuse creates aggressive animals.
maybe you should separate lethal bites to normal bites? i'd rather get bit by a chihuahua than by a pitbull i find it odd that you didn't even mention what pitbulls were bred for...
For real. Everyone's always like "bUt ChIhUaHuAs!!!!!!" but I could kick a field goal with a chihuahua. Not that I ever would though because chihuahuas are so small that they're almost harmless to people.
It's just how Vox does things. They leave out key information or anything inconvenient to build their scripts. Their video editors are really good, but they are either incompetent or dishonest
1:50 Gotta love how Vox tries to defend these dogs by making it about black people. Like why are we talking about rap music right now?! That has nothing to do with the cold hard fact that this breed is dangerous. Trying to make a connection between a serious issue such as racism towards Black American PEOPLE about DOGS.
@@yuu34567 dog "breeds" can't be equaled to human "races" because dogs aren't rational animals and therefore their inherited traits are much more prevalent.
as a black person who hates pitbulls, it sickens me. races are not different breeds of human. all humans share the same essential genetic makeup. meanwhile, pitbulls are engineered by humans and were specifically bred to emphasize their aggressive and violent characteristics. also, certain groups (idk if i can say the name in youtube comments) used to release pitbulls into black neighborhoods on purpose just to destroy as much life as possible.
They should read some of the newspaper articles about their attacks around the early 1900s, they are hilariously honest about these "family dogs" being extremely dangerous
If everybody wants to know why this Vox video is poorly done, uses flawed logic and basically just said "Nuh uh" to per capita statistics, this is because this video is one big EUPHEMISM for something else..
the worst thing you can do for pitbulls is spread misinformation about them. they were never, ever nanny dogs, and spreading that myth sets these dogs up for failure.
@@travismcadamsright prior to the modern era they slaughtered each other in the pit for entertainment and betting purposes, and tortured bulls to death in the pit before that, all just good clean family fun that is now a felony lol
They actually are great family dogs IF raised and socialised correctly. But obviously that often doesn't happen, which is dangerous for everyone and really tragic for the dog.
Vox on why XYZ is not bad, "Did you know that 80 years ago, people were wrong about something totally unrelated to XYZ? Really puts things into perspective, doesn't it?"
Did this video really try to argue that its racism, and not this breeds record of causing severe damage or death compared to other breeds as the reason it has the reputation it does? Also, about the mislabelling-its the opposite. There have been way too many pitbulls labelled as labrador/golden retrievers by shelters in a bid to get clearly people who have never seen a dog before to adopt them.
@@RustyShackleferd-2Fallacy user, I can take a bite. So, according to most medical statistics in the US, pitbulls are the most common culprits but so are Rottweilers and German Shepherds (which is my favorite). And these statistics don’t even go to the root of why the dog bite another person. Most if not all dogs are docile if given a safe environment, food and shelter, unconditional love, like any other human being. If not, this is what you end up with. They can snap and attack anyone they deem a threat. It’s their defensive nature.
The actions of humans got them that reputation. Pit bulls are the most abused breed of dog in the world, and the temperament scores of pit bulls tell us that they are not inherently more aggressive than other breeds.
@@thefabledfish They literally cause more than half of all deaths to both other animals and humans of all dog-related deaths. Their actions got them that reputation.
@thefabledfish That doesn't make the dogs less dangerous. Sure, it's the human's fault that their pet grizzly got loose, but that doesn't make the bear harmless in any other human's hands.
One breed (or family of closely related breeds, if you want to be technical about it) is responsible for the the majority of fatal attacks and the majority of disfiguring injuries. "Aggression studies" and "temperament tests" are meaningless because they don't account for a dog's capability to cause harm to humans. Pit bulls and their close relations were selectively bred for bloodsport, so they have physical and behavioral traits that make them far more deadly than other breeds when they do bite. I generally enjoy Vox content, but this is dangerous misinformation in the guise of social justice.
Right? You can't say @4:10 "we don't have good numbers on dog bite statistics" then conclude that pit bulls are not dangerous. I have first hand experience with bully breeds, they more often than other breeds have psychological and fear aggression issues
I can't believe they keep giving Bronwen Dickey a platform. Her book is full of alternative facts and breed history appropriation as they've taken a lot from the history of the Boston Terrier, which was the true American icon in the early 20th century. It's disgraceful.
“The stats aren’t reliable because people keep misidentifying dogs as Pits. Anyway, here’s our employee admitting to intentionally misidentifying her Pit as something else to make her dog look better, for the world to see.”
The shelters are full of “lab-mixes” that look nothing like a lab. It’s blatant. I rescued an ACTUAL lab-mix and she is the sweetest dog, but was attacked two months ago by a large pit bull broken out of its harness.
also, their other statistic about "90% of dogs in shelters are misidentified" is almost DEFINITELY due to them taking pitbull/mixes and labeling them as "labmix" instead to try and get unsuspecting families to adpot them. Go to any shelters website and you will see its a huge problem.
@@BravoRoxthe opposition has facts, statistics, biology, and history on their side ... Can you really call that entertainment? 😂 They should really ask what's left of the Bennard family in TN why pit bulls have a bad name. If you're going to interview their lobbyists at BFAS, why not interview their many, many victims, too?
as a former pitbull owner no dog is inherently family friendly. they are all animals. some of these dogs are bred for a purpose. hounds, shepherds, terriers, guarding. APBT or pit bulldogs were bred for dogfighting.
Thank you I know someone who had a border collie years ago and it went up the road without any training and got the neighbors cows from up the road and brought them back to her yard Just naturally did that They had to straighten it out cuz she had to call the neighbor and tell that the border Collie brought all her cows down to the yard True story and the classic amongst the people around there
Even if pitbulls aren’t naturally more likely to bite than other dogs, the veterinarian fact that when they not only have among the strongest bites but literally were breed to not stop biting. Very few large dogs have that trait and that’s what makes them dangerous. If they snap, they have a deadly bite and often won’t stop biting for a long time
@@user-digitalfarmgirl That is the point. No one has ever been killed or even seriously injured by a Chihuahua while thousands of people have been either killed or permanently disfigured and maimed by pit bulls just behaving like they were bred to do.
Unless youve seen the damage these dogs do, and how excited they are to do it AND OFTEN it's these exact dogs, you shouldn't talk on this. Pitbulls that people have as family pets have the instinct of a predator. Once they bite, their jaw locks. I've seen medical textbook images of pitbull attacks. They have literally decapitated babies. There's videos of pitbulls mauling a person and as police are literally shooting the dog, it's tail keeps wagging until it's last breath.
@@fatsquirrel75 Technically yes, but have you ever tried to pry a pitbulls jaws off of something? They were bred to have extremely powerful jaw muscles and the drive to not let go of their prey. So yes, physiologically speaking, their jaws don't lock but they have a "lock-like effect."
As a dog trainer, I agree APBT's (and their mixes) are uniquely dangerous. But a dog in distress, or a dog with a high level of energy, will also wag its tail even when in pain. When APBT's maul, they are stressed, but their response to stress can be mauling, and not just a nip. They can go years without ever hurting anyone, but then once they're pushed past threshold, someone is dead.
@fatsquirrel75 they have no skeletal mechanism to lock their jaws, but they will deliberately and famously never let go once they're latched on, to do as much damage as possible. it's what they're bred for.
I am a pediatric neurosurgeon and you wouldn’t believe the injuries and deaths I have seen by dog bites, and yes most of them have been Pit bulls or Am Staffs as they are called here. Please look at statistics when creating a video like this.
@@thefabledfish Statistically you are more likely to be bitten by a chihuahua, and while this is unacceptable, what that dog can do you is not worse than bruising or some punctures. If a pitbull takes a bite of you or your dog, even though it may be less likely, statistically speaking, it's far far far more likely to create a catastrophic injury.
@@kaamos79 that’s not even what I’m arguing. But claiming that any opposition either didn’t use statistics or used the “wrong statistics” is intellectually dishonest.
What a fascinating look into how dishonest and manipulative emotionally-driven pitbull lovers can be. PLEASE do not let your guard down around these dogs people, for your own safety and that of any children you know.
Projecting your unconquered fear and the way you handle it doesn't make them dishonest. 1. You can't point out what they got wrong because you would have wrote it already. 2. They never said in the video to walk up to random dogs with your guard down.
I almost never comment on CZcams. This is just bad journalism.... And all the dog attacks I've personally experienced have been pit pulls. They are in shelters in droves for a reason. They are the most fatal dog attacks for a reason.
I am sory but the only 2 dogs to have given me nerve damage and killed my cats IN MY HOUSE have been pit bulls. It's not the personality, its the fact that they are so hard to regain control of WHEN it happens, not if.
They always say wouldn’t hurt a fly. Yet they never want to talk about cats, birds, squirrels, etc. 99% of these pit owners would not leave the dog alone in a room with a cat, if it were on camera and everyone could see what happens.
@@JayCray421then I'd say that neither of the 3 knew how to handle a large breed dog , or aggressive one . I won't have any other breed besides pit bull . But they have to be trained right because they are bull headed at times and if you let them get away with that kind of behavior , they'll think it's OK to repeat it over & over . But once trained , they made great family pets .
What about the thousands of unreported chihuahua bites! Sure one person got ripped in half but what about all the tiny cuts and superficial tooth marks? /s
@@Zarrykotter you gave me a flashback to that epic r/banpitbulls moment when that guy tried to act like 21,000 people had been killed by chihuahuas and his source was a wikipedia page about people who have died in the mexican state of chihuahua.
It’s the owners… every pitbull I’ve ever met is sweet and kind. They are actually really in touch with their emotional side and love kids as well.. sorry if you’ve had a bad experience with any pits
Now they'll try to paint everything as "racist cultural myths cimented by the movies" when in reality pitbulls indeed are responsible for the majority of dog attack deaths despite being less than 10% of domestic dog population. Dogs aren't people, we can't attribute social inequality and societal failures for the aggression in these animals, they just _are_ different from other dogs. Their breed is literally classified as "fight dogs", they were specifically bred over centuries to be used in dogfighting. Artificially bred to be as aggressive, deadly, and resistent as possible. What will woke capitalism try to sell us next, that tigers are actually cuddly kitty cats and if you think otherwise you're a racist influenced by white supremacy in pop culture?
I literally know myltiple people that were mauled pr their children were mauled by pitbulls, 2 of whom are now dead and 0 people who have been involved in a shark attack so Im gonna hard disagree with you on this tale Vox.
Let's get real. Pits and other famously aggressive dogs account for like 15% of pets in America but nearly 90% of the dog related deaths. That's the problem. Denying that is foolish
This is an ignorant statement. It is ultimately the owner and/or humans who are responsible for dog related deaths. Chiwawas and other smaller dogs are known for being mean and nip at people all the time. Personally, I've never ran into a mean pit bull, they were always sweethearts.
Wow, Vox completely missed the mark. It's not about the number of bites, it's about the damage caused. The risk doesn't lie in these dogs' temperament, but rather in their strength. I hope you guys review your take on this.
The line everyone seems to be ignoring is "there's no evidence that pit bulls are inherently dangerous". I knew someone attacked pretty badly by a husky. I'm not prejudice against that breed. The point of this video was to soften the negative perception of the breed. Clearly any huge damage done the dog should be dealt with. I think what Vox missed was the dog owner needs to be more responsible. If you have a dog that you know bites, you need to do something about it before an incident happens
@@Paragon-su8jt when huskies account for over 66% of all human fatalities, then it would make sense for you to be wary of the breed. People don’t just pick on pit bulls for no reason.
@@Paragon-su8jt what clearly happened is that someone noticed lots of severe incidents involving pitbulls. That was because they were everywhere, many of which were poorly trained. Someone mistook it for "this breed is inherently dangerous, there are more bites by them than by Labradors". I totally get the point, I wouldn't feel comfortable having my little daughter in the same park as a unmuzzled big dog, pitbull or not
Did Denmark also have a racial problem that associated danger with pitbulls? If not, can you elaborate on why other countries are banning this breed? Can you elaborate on the research into the number fatalities caused by different breeds, and the relative percentage of populations of the breeds?
0 statistics in this video, no matter if you agree or disagree with the premise of the video it would be nice to have some statstics from Europe where we have to register dogs so the numbers are more accurate
Yup; there is a lot of saying "statistics about biting breeds don't matter when it is difficult to pin down breed" but then they claim that pitbulls are one of the most popular breeds; if they can identify a pitbull to determine its popularity then they can identify them for bites.
@@kathrynchristiansen It's goalpost shifting. "Ackchyually there is no 'pitbull'." "Sweet pibbles was just scared and that's why he mauled that cat/maltese/infant"
Pretty flimsy video tbh. As others have noted, whether small dogs bite as much or more commonly than pit bulls is not relevant. The severity + the frequency is what matters. Hence why you don't see calls to ban golden retrievers or labs or other dogs that are equivalent in size to pit bulls. Also, just because a pit bull is sweet to its owner doesn't mean it won't be aggressive to "perceived" threats. Tired of hearing pitbull owners tell us how sweet their pitty is and then you try and pet it and it snaps at your hand lol.
@@RustyShackleferd-2 they’re talking about the *coverage* of the issue in the beginning. How the media manipulates the issue, not the issue itself. The issue itself comes in the middle of the video.
A day after posting an incredibly balanced video of Kamala Harris that was excellent, Vox posts a video that cites a few studies on dog bites (that don't mention fatality rates) and interviews only from people with clear biases. Editors must have fallen asleep for this one.
Dogs breeds are the perfect experiment of how behaviors are genetically influenced so yeah, a dog bred to be aggressive will be, to no-one's surprise, aggressive in general
That is the very crux of what pit-bull defenders believe. It's a philosophy about life itself, the idea that you are purely societally influenced, genetics don't play a role in behaviour, or at least negative behaviour. The hypocrisy is so frustrating. You'll have pitbull defenders boast about how different breeds have different positive qualities, but when it comes to negative - it doesn't exist and could never.
@@normietwiceremoved This is the thing that gets me. You can't say "border collies are more loyal than other dogs" and say "pitbulls aren't more aggressive" and be internally consistent.
Except "dog breeds" are the result of massive inbreeding the likes of which has been prevented in most human societies for thousands of years. "Perfect experiment" if your standards are lower than a snake's cloaca.
By Best Friends Animal Society you mean the Process Church of the Final Judgment right? LOL Note: apparently Vox was recently acquired by the same media group as The Dodo. :c
They might not have higher danger of biting someone, but when they DO, they cause more damage, that's why they should be a controlled breed. If you compare to sharks like she did, you get bit a lot by fish in rivers and the sea, no one cares, but with a shark, a bite is a bite.
Deleted this video and admit you guys got paid for this fluff piece. Focused on Total bites and not fatal bites? It’s the fact that when a Pit snaps it has one of if not the strongest bites AND breed to not stop biting why they are so dangerous
@gmodrules123456789 pitbull advocacy groups who want to adopt out pitbulls to as many families as possible, because 90% of dogs in shelters are some type of pit. they know many well-meaning people are ignorant about the danger of the breed. shelters already lie about bite history and mislabel pitbulls deliberately. if you go to your local shelter page right now, i can guarantee that you will see many obvious pits labeled as "lab mix" or "husky mix" or other breeds that they only bear a passing resemblance to.
This video belongs on a "how to lie and mislead with statistics" compilation. You deliberately change the parameters of what people are concerned about, from dog attacks resulting in injury to dog attacks resulting in death. This is actually really beneath your quality bar.
All I know is that the only 2 times dogs charged at me to the point where I had to call for help, those dogs had the wide mouthed, tiny eared, big head, big chest, look. They were not especially big, but they wanted to maul me. They certainly looked like a part of the pit bull breed. When a dog charges you it is not going to end well.
Here's a friend of Vox, Lauren the responsible pitbull owner with her pitbull unleashed at the park in the picnic area. Why do apartments ban pitbulls? Because of people like Lauren! Oh & the insurance companies who won't insure them.
The only dog I have ever been properly attacked and bit by was a Pitbull, same goes for my sister. The attack was unprovoked, we were both playing in an open field. I'm sure they can be sweet but the fact that we were both attacked as children will forever change how I perceive them. They have a prey drive that extends to humans, and that's unacceptable.
I lived next door to a house that had a pitbull. I think they tied him up during the day, but when I got home at night and had to go up the street, which was extremely steep, he was at the entrance. He saw me and started barking and running, it was clear he wanted to attack me. The gate was short. Every time I was scared to death that he would be able to jump and break free. As the street was very steep, I always thought it would be impossible for me to get to my house before him, so I used to think about what I should protect if that happened. I lived there for a short time and that was a big reason for me to move. I knew if he managed to get out I was doomed.
Exactly. It dodges pit bull fatalities by talking about overall bite statistics. There is no comparison. In the 15-year period of 2005 through 2019, canines killed 521 Americans. Pit bulls contributed to 66% (346) of these deaths. Combined, pit bulls and rottweilers contributed to 76% of the total recorded deaths.
I'm pretty sure CZcams simply ignores that complaint or even PROMOTES videos that get enough complaints because it proves engagement. CZcams only want's ad revenue.
This is "journalism"? Where was a single interview for the opposition against Pit Bulls? This reeks of a colleague (perhaps that "friend of Vox) using their position to get a story out.
'Listen it's really sad your face got ripped off but did you know my baby Nala isn't even a pitbull she's an american chungus terrier black lab cross ACTUALLY, and anyway pitbulls were bred to be nanny dogs so clearly you spooked her triggering her PTSD'
And "nanny dog" doesn't appear in literature prior to 1975. You would think a PhD could have uncovered that. Oh wait.... it goes against her thesis so we'll just omit it.
As someone coming into this video with no knowledge about dogs, I'm only hearing the argument that "they're not dangerous, you're just supposed to train them!" but they didn't address whether they are inherently more aggressive or not, which is what I wanted to know. By not addressing it, I think they kind of answered the question though.
What is the charge? Eating a baby? A succulent newborn baby?
I understood the reference 😂, RIP Charles docza, he gave us such a great meme
I am under what?
you come here from learning about Fever?
If everybody wants to know why this Vox video is poorly done, uses flawed logic and basically just said "Nuh uh" to per capita statistics, this is because this video is one big EUPHEMISM for something else..
I just recently learned about this meme and wondered where it had been my whole life.
You started the video referencing a news story about a DEATH caused by 13 pitbulls but then only talked about BITES.
A study of all dog bite related Fatalities that occured during the ten year period 2000- 2009 were described in atleast one media account with a single breed descriptor, potentially implying that the dog was pure breed (Patronek et. al 2013) However, approximately 46% of the dogs are mixed breed ( American Veterinary Medical Association) And it seemed unlikely to the authors that pure breed dogs would be disproportionately represented among the dogs involved in these incidents. Further, in only 18% of the cases were the author's able to make valid determination of the dog involved was a member of a distinct recognized breed (Patronek et al 2013) Nevertheless unverified reports of the dog breeds involved in serious and fatal incidents have been used to develop opinions regarding percieved danger of different breeds (voith et al, 2009, Voith et al 2013)
4:18 Isn't that still relevant? A chihuahua bites you and you need a band aid, but a large dog like a pit bull bites you and you need serious reconstructive surgery.
YES. Terrible argument they made. Even if pitbulls aren’t naturally more likely to bite than other dogs, the veterinarian fact that when they not only have among the strongest bites but literally were breed to not stop biting. Very few large dogs have that trait and that’s what makes them dangerous. If they snap, they have a deadly bite and often won’t stop biting for a long time
yeah but not all large dogs are pitbulls. why single out pitbulls when you can just say “large dogs”
@@Homer-OJ-Simpson But if that were true, then wouldn't the worst reputation go to the dog with the worst bite? Of all the dog breeds bred to bite hard and not let go, why is it only the pitbull-group breeds that are villainized like this?
@@rachellee2680 True, almost all large dog breeds should be considered dangerous. Chow chow's are one breed that's not talked about enough despite how strong and aggressive they are.
@@rachellee2680 Pitbulls belong to the terrier group for which the overwhelming majority are smaller than the average dog and possess that tenacity to keep biting prey (high prey drive). Pitbulls are a problem in this way because they are large muscular dogs - bred with tenacity of a terrier. Most popular large dogs are not terriers nor belong to the terrier group in any capacity.
Have to say, this is one of the worst researched Vox videos I’ve ever seen. No diving into the statistics? No distinctions between minor bits and major injuries? Yes, raw dog bite statistics are nearly meaningless, but that doesn’t mean statistics about the injuries in general are meaningless. Yes, you have to scale the numbers based on population distribution, yes there are pitfalls in interpreting the statistics, but the whole point of an outfit like Vox is to find an expert and ask THEM about it, not just write it off casually. No mention about dogs being bred for specific purposes? There’s enough holes in this piece I could use it to strain pasta.
Ikr!? This is probably the worst video I’ve seen them do
they did find an expert opinion about the dog bite statistics: the american veterinary association. they said dog bite statistics are fundamentally flawed. how can you possibly then find meaning and truth in those statistics?
@@stolenshortsword Ask a pediatric surgeon whether they think dog bite statistics are flawed.
@@stolenshortsword dog bite statistics may be flawed, but fatal dog attack statistics aren't
@@stolenshortsword She was completely wrong. There is tons of evidence that pitbulls are far more likely to cause serious harm.
It's not a pitbull, it's a mix.
"Mixed with what? Another pitbull?!" -Bill Burr
😂
Up to 4 different pit bulls.
Exactly. “It’s a mix between a pitbull and a bull terrier” he would never hurt a fly (please don’t ask about the cats he’s killed)
Ha, I remember that.
@@phiveone there is only one pitbull the APBT
“Statically, goldfish are more likely to bite you than a great white shark.”
Who paid for this fluff piece? Why are you laser-focused on the statistics of dog bites and not fatal dog attacks?
Vox bought The Dodo and the Dodo was caught running pet insurance scams. They're feeding the beast, literally
Yes
Dog bites is not equal to mauled or killed by dogs
Because that statistic would ruin their argument
Because Best Friends and the lady at 3:21 directly profit from anti BSL legislation.
Affiliated with the Dodo
Small dog bite statistics dont matter in the context of this argument because even if they are more aggressive than pitbulls (honestly they are imo), the level of harm caused by a small dog attack is almost nothing. If pitbulls represent 70% of the attacks by larger dog breeds, then that is statistically significant and we can say that, given a dog is a larger breed, pitbulls demonstrate far more violent tendencies. Hand waving away pitbull statistics by pointing out that we dont really measure small dog bite occurences doesnt work because that isnt relevant to the conversation.
yeah if we were observing both pit bulls and rottweilers you’d see that those two breeds alone make up a the majority of bites resulting in injury
i don’t know how people can look at that and think the data is actually completely wrong and that pit bulls aren’t aggressive. they are, and they deal damage with their aggression
I slightly disagree, I'd say it's relavent. It's important to decide whether the pit bull is a dog that when it does attack, its too severe.
"It's not the dog, it's the owner," is a canard I hear often. The problem is that not every dog owner can be an animal behavior specialist. Many dogs will be aggressive with other dogs or anyone they perceive as a threat to their territory. While most people can restrain smaller breeds, many owners of large and strong dog breeds aren't physically capable of restraining their animal. The dog may be perfectly placid around the owner and their family, but watch out when the dog perceives a threat.
I think it's relevant because if you want to argue that a dog is aggressive due to its breeding then showing that small dogs, that aren't bred for aggression, are in fact aggressive means that it might not be breed related. If you ban dogs because of their potential harm, then all large dogs should be banned.
It's not because of "potential harm" it's because of decades of correlated statistics that show the breed umbrella that includes PB, Staffy, Boxer etc.. is vastly overrepresented in the severe injury, maiming and death numbers when talking about dog attacks.
There are more Golden's, Labs etc.. than bully breeds but they don't cause any significant amount of fatal attacks. Bully's do.
Did a pitbull make this video??
A pitbull owner whose dog ate a child likely funded this video to allow his dog into a daycare.
A pitmommie did
@@kristinlynn2763 Mr Worldwide Mr 305 dale🇨🇺
@@somethingsomething404 Fr
It's just wild how many purse-pomeranian karens there are commenting on this video
Fatal dog attack statistics by breed 66% Pitbull - Source: American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA), 1979 - 1998.
Hey! Stats on pit bulls are UNRELIABLE!!!.....but did you know they are the most popular breed ever?
Most popular dog in America, thus most attacks.
@@arcticwulf5796 they account for 6% of the total US dog population
@@arcticwulf5796that's not.... erm.... that's not how statistics work there pal....
It's probably closer to 70% if not higher today.
This is an awful piece of journalism
If everybody wants to know why this Vox video is poorly done, uses flawed logic and basically just said "Nuh uh" to per capita statistics, this is because this video is one big EUPHEMISM for something else..
@@TrifectaReachwhat ? Elaborate
Because it doesn't align with your pre-existing beliefs?
in my opinion they even misrepresented the study from denmark: the study admits that some breeds have been shown to cause more injuries than others, even when considering that they are overrepresented in the data set. Also the "ban" meant 2 breeds became illegal to own and 11 more just needed to be muzzeled in public. when you consider that 67% of injuries are caused in private, the legislature hat no effect on these cases, but they are counted nonetheless. The study is focussed on the reports of a singular hospital as well, so no country wide data.
all in all the data doesnt really support the conclusion of the study since they generalize from a single hospitals data to the country wide effectiveness of legislature and this is being generalized even more by vox, saying these "results" would be comparable to different legislature in a different country (actual ban of all pit bull related breeds)
@@whiskeywolfgang no, because whining and throwing a hissy fit claiming that per capita statistics are wrong because "err it count other factors too!" is objectively awful and the most obvious example of twisting a narrative.
Never thought I would watch Pitbull PR.
you know it's a bad breed when it needs literal LOBBIES and political pandering to clean up their image
Is this satire?
I seriously hope it was..
Are you satire?
why would it be satire
@@karan_karan_karan”the Stats aren’t reliable because people keep misidentifying pit bulls. Anyway, here’s our employee who intentionally misrepresents her pit bull to improve her dog’s image.”
@@karan_karan_karan because how could it be real
4:15 False equivalence, small dog breeds like chihuahuas don't cause serious injuries nor fatalities.
You spotted a fallacy, well done
Exactly!
Yes! Also, two wrongs don't make a right !
While I agree with you for the most part, small breed dogs DO and HAVE caused serious injuries and even fatalities. Children are attacked the most.
The case that immediately comes to mind is in 2001 when a Pomeranian attacked and killed a 6-month baby.
@@ryleeroo an extremely rare instance of a small dog killing a baby is not equivalent to the regular occurrences of pit bulls killing kids and ADULTS.
4:18 what a terrible video. Even if pitbulls aren’t naturally more likely to bite than other dogs, the very fact that when they not only have among the strongest bites but literally were breed to not stop biting. Very few large dogs have that trait and that’s what makes them dangerous. If they snap, they have a deadly bite and often won’t stop biting for a long time
Pit bulls are barely in the top 20 of strongest bites, and physiologically there's nothing special about their jaws that makes their bites worse.
Super disingenuous to equate small dog bites to fatal dog bites.
Almost criminal
There are statistics, perhaps not in the US. The UK had 10 deadly dog attacks in 2022, six of them involved an American Bully XL (a pitbull type of dog, bred to be bigger than your standard one) while making 6% of the dogs population in the UK (in europe we need to register our dogs).
Also, a poorly trained yorki bite, will end with me getting a tetanus vaccine injection in the worst case. A poorly trained pitbull bite will end in dead or lost limbs.
BTW, tell my own dog pitbulls are not dangerous after one just broke her jaw with a single bite. Resulting in a long recovery and the permanent lost of 4 of her teeth.
Your dog bit her own jaw off?
@@alex.g7317 my dog is not a pibull, but an australian shepherd, she was bitten by a pitbull in a park
@@alex.g7317 nope, a pitbull bite her jaw... my dog is not pitbull
@@asambatyon so sorry to hear about your pet and wishing you and her both the best. There are people coming around to the fact that these dogs don't belong in our society.
@@asambatyon oh.. that makes more sense lol
the specific breeds ban is not just "those breeds are more aggressive" but is also "those breeds have stronger bites and can deal much more damage than other dogs"
So Dalmatians, Great Danes, and German sheps should also be banned. Every large breed.
3:21 Best Friends profits from anti-BSL positions. Vox is carrying water for a lobbying group.
Then by that logic Rottweilers, German Shepherds, Boxers, and all Mastiffs should be banned as well. Breed banning is the dumbest thing to enforce.
@@OneStripeRyanThat's some real 'Nothing wrong with an AR-15' logic you got going there
@@STimo95A gun is intended to shoot, a dog is not intended to bite forcefully or intentionally, your logic is fundamentally flawed
Cmon vox, this video was all vibes, no data.
Typical of vox.
Literally. "We should all be able to own lions" vibes. If every lion owner was perfectly responsible and could guarantee that their lion wasn't a public safety risk, sure! I'd love to live in that fantasy world too, lions are cool!
@@A38 Ah, yes, lions, those animals that are notoriously difficult to identify by the general populace and are such popular pets that their numbers make them statistically more likely to bite but not necessarily more aggressive by nature. Just like pit bulls.
Well, actually they showed that the data that exists is not viable. Except the one data from Denmark, where they showed, that banning pit bulls did not change dog bite statistics. So maybe you should watch again.
This got addressed in the video.
4:00 Does society give golden instincts to retrieve or a Aussie the instinct to herd or do they just do it?
Man did create the pit bull and we did it for the purpose to fight. Why can we acknowledge that other breeds were created for specific jobs but blind ourselves to the “work” of the pit bull, executing on the purpose that we created them for. This is a savior complex.
Yea I luv how vox just casually gloss over that and barely mentioned it
@@kzh2313but Petey in our gang!!
I've actually heard pit owners claim that they are a working breed. 😂 Thanks for pointing out the actual work they were bred for.
Your point being? AMERICAN PITBULL TERRIER is a breed pitbull isn’t
Exactly. They’re great at their “job” but that job is killing
Dog bites off of a face and people will jump to defend the dog. Ive seen it all.
Remember when that pitbull bit off a kid's hand? The kid stuck it through the fence into the neighbor's yard and the pitbull that lived there just tore if off. The internet was full of pitbull apologists who tried to blame it on the child.
Yup
@@vashsunglassesI mean he stuck his hand through a fence🤷🏻♀️
Then don't raise the dog to be violent
DUH
@@vashsunglassesit's the owners fault
trash journalism. You hit a new low.
what did they get wrong (facts you can back up only)
@@millerrepin4452 Everything. This is a piece of cherry picked information trying to whitewash pitbulls, which is no wonfer knowing Vox was recently purchased by the same media company as The Dodo, which regularly whitewashes "pitties", nevermind these dogs snap at people unprovoked on a regular basis.
@millerrepin4452 quite literally everything. everything in this video can be refuted. look up dog bit fatality statistics. look into the history of the breed; they were never "nanny dogs", this was a myth started in the 1970s.
@@kimutone2970 do better
@@samolbe6845 I could and for less money, just so happens that corpos don't fund me to push trash false narratives like Vox.
Next video: "How salt water crocs got a bad reputation"
"birds ear more animals than crocodiles"🤓
" but it's a victim fault for cuz they were breathing wayy to loud🧐" /s
spoiler it's because of racism😤
birb bites are more common than crocodile bites! birb bad croc gud!
“People often mistake them for alligators” 🤓
It's NOT which dogs bite more, but which dog can do serious damage once it bites.
This common sense differentiator is lost on all pitbull defenders.
Aside from the FACT that pit bulls are among the least aggressive dog breeds, which you seem to acknowledge, they are also the most abused. Animal abuse creates aggressive animals.
maybe you should separate lethal bites to normal bites? i'd rather get bit by a chihuahua than by a pitbull
i find it odd that you didn't even mention what pitbulls were bred for...
For real. Everyone's always like "bUt ChIhUaHuAs!!!!!!" but I could kick a field goal with a chihuahua. Not that I ever would though because chihuahuas are so small that they're almost harmless to people.
It's just how Vox does things. They leave out key information or anything inconvenient to build their scripts. Their video editors are really good, but they are either incompetent or dishonest
There's massive underreporting of wounds inflicted by pellet guns compared to actual guns.
He literally explained the entire history of the breed in the first half of the video, how bad is your attention span? Lmso
@@ouya_expert “and because we don’t have these statistics, we should ignore all gun statistics altogether”…what?!
Very one sided view with no representatives of the BSL. What a failure of a journalism!
1:50 Gotta love how Vox tries to defend these dogs by making it about black people. Like why are we talking about rap music right now?! That has nothing to do with the cold hard fact that this breed is dangerous. Trying to make a connection between a serious issue such as racism towards Black American PEOPLE about DOGS.
Unfortunately pit bulls are racialized and this is extremely well known and documented. Vox isn't bringing in race for no reason.
@@yuu34567 dog "breeds" can't be equaled to human "races" because dogs aren't rational animals and therefore their inherited traits are much more prevalent.
as a black person who hates pitbulls, it sickens me. races are not different breeds of human. all humans share the same essential genetic makeup. meanwhile, pitbulls are engineered by humans and were specifically bred to emphasize their aggressive and violent characteristics. also, certain groups (idk if i can say the name in youtube comments) used to release pitbulls into black neighborhoods on purpose just to destroy as much life as possible.
Funny how it's always the ones who cry about racism the hardest that turn around and do things like conflating dogs and black people
"Pitbulls were once thought as a great family dog" as they show a dog half the size of a modern pitbull
They should read some of the newspaper articles about their attacks around the early 1900s, they are hilariously honest about these "family dogs" being extremely dangerous
One of the worst videos from Vox. No research done at all...
Said without any arguments or research of your own
you could've checked the description and read the 11 sources, but k
they got an expert, we gotta check her book.
We should be checking our sources anyway.
If everybody wants to know why this Vox video is poorly done, uses flawed logic and basically just said "Nuh uh" to per capita statistics, this is because this video is one big EUPHEMISM for something else..
@@TrifectaReachfor what dude? You’ve been reposting your comment everywhere and never saying why it’s a euphemism
the worst thing you can do for pitbulls is spread misinformation about them. they were never, ever nanny dogs, and spreading that myth sets these dogs up for failure.
What are you talking about? It’s well documented that they were family dogs prior to the modern era.
They literally never said "nanny dog." They absolutely were generic family pets and filled various working dog roles as well.
@@yokaidealervarious working jobs sure is a funny euphemism for "killing bulls and then each other for entertainment purposes"
@@travismcadamsright prior to the modern era they slaughtered each other in the pit for entertainment and betting purposes, and tortured bulls to death in the pit before that, all just good clean family fun that is now a felony lol
They actually are great family dogs IF raised and socialised correctly. But obviously that often doesn't happen, which is dangerous for everyone and really tragic for the dog.
Report this video for misinformation
Yeah
CZcams should incorporate a fact checking community like Twitter.
Done!
Oh, that's easy; they sometimes eat people's faces, including the owners. Next question.
Ok Trump😂😂😂😂😂
@@samolbe6845 is this a pit bull I’m speaking to? 😂
Vox on why XYZ is not bad, "Did you know that 80 years ago, people were wrong about something totally unrelated to XYZ? Really puts things into perspective, doesn't it?"
Did this video really try to argue that its racism, and not this breeds record of causing severe damage or death compared to other breeds as the reason it has the reputation it does? Also, about the mislabelling-its the opposite. There have been way too many pitbulls labelled as labrador/golden retrievers by shelters in a bid to get clearly people who have never seen a dog before to adopt them.
The denmark example seems like a pretty solid argument
@@left9096 it's not. Why not look at any medical studies in the US? They all point to a very clear culprit
@@RustyShackleferd-2Fallacy user, I can take a bite. So, according to most medical statistics in the US, pitbulls are the most common culprits but so are Rottweilers and German Shepherds (which is my favorite). And these statistics don’t even go to the root of why the dog bite another person. Most if not all dogs are docile if given a safe environment, food and shelter, unconditional love, like any other human being. If not, this is what you end up with. They can snap and attack anyone they deem a threat. It’s their defensive nature.
@@left9096I think that Denmark example came from a single hospital’s reports.
@@RustyShackleferd-2 "Why not look at studies that agree with my argument"
Their actions. Their actions got them the reputation.
The actions of humans got them that reputation. Pit bulls are the most abused breed of dog in the world, and the temperament scores of pit bulls tell us that they are not inherently more aggressive than other breeds.
@@thefabledfish They literally cause more than half of all deaths to both other animals and humans of all dog-related deaths. Their actions got them that reputation.
@@PrairieWindSun dogs don’t have mens rea. The blame lies with the humans who overbreed and abuse these dogs. Full stop.
@thefabledfish That doesn't make the dogs less dangerous. Sure, it's the human's fault that their pet grizzly got loose, but that doesn't make the bear harmless in any other human's hands.
@@thefabledfish The blame does indeed lie with anyone who breeds these hellhounds.
I've been bitten by a ferret but never a great white shark; therefore, ferrets are more dangerous to humans.
ferret bit me 3 times, shark bit me 0 times, therefore shark good
@@christos.5302you have a point, now I wanna a shark as a pet
One breed (or family of closely related breeds, if you want to be technical about it) is responsible for the the majority of fatal attacks and the majority of disfiguring injuries. "Aggression studies" and "temperament tests" are meaningless because they don't account for a dog's capability to cause harm to humans. Pit bulls and their close relations were selectively bred for bloodsport, so they have physical and behavioral traits that make them far more deadly than other breeds when they do bite.
I generally enjoy Vox content, but this is dangerous misinformation in the guise of social justice.
Right? You can't say @4:10 "we don't have good numbers on dog bite statistics" then conclude that pit bulls are not dangerous. I have first hand experience with bully breeds, they more often than other breeds have psychological and fear aggression issues
Yeah this was the first video I’ve seen from Vox that I didn’t like at all.
Nah, still going to get one.
@@Eli-ss9gjlmao even you libs are right once in a while
@@SmokeNGunsBBQ weird comment making this political for no reason but okay 👍🏾
Vox, this is rage bait. Retract this poor excuse for journalism. I can’t believe this made it through so many editors.
I can't believe they keep giving Bronwen Dickey a platform. Her book is full of alternative facts and breed history appropriation as they've taken a lot from the history of the Boston Terrier, which was the true American icon in the early 20th century. It's disgraceful.
@@VeroVero-cd3mjit feels like she wrote the script for this video
@@VeroVero-cd3mj Curruption
It's just wild how many purse-pomeranian karens there are commenting on this video
I wish this video was more balanced and not so one sided.
But if a chihuahua bites me it doesn’t break my bones…
Yes, they missed the point, but they are not fool. I think this is an ad
“The stats aren’t reliable because people keep misidentifying dogs as Pits. Anyway, here’s our employee admitting to intentionally misidentifying her Pit as something else to make her dog look better, for the world to see.”
The shelters are full of “lab-mixes” that look nothing like a lab. It’s blatant. I rescued an ACTUAL lab-mix and she is the sweetest dog, but was attacked two months ago by a large pit bull broken out of its harness.
More than halfway through before even beginning to talk about the stats!
also, their other statistic about "90% of dogs in shelters are misidentified" is almost DEFINITELY due to them taking pitbull/mixes and labeling them as "labmix" instead to try and get unsuspecting families to adpot them. Go to any shelters website and you will see its a huge problem.
Extremely irresponsible of that woman.
Exactly. I hope her landlord sees this.
What a sad piece of "journalism".
Why do they even make this video without hearing the opposition
@@BravoRoxthe opposition has facts, statistics, biology, and history on their side ... Can you really call that entertainment? 😂
They should really ask what's left of the Bennard family in TN why pit bulls have a bad name. If you're going to interview their lobbyists at BFAS, why not interview their many, many victims, too?
Sad to see Vox going down this path. Zero facts, underdog argument, anecdotal testimonies, what is this?
@@danield137the "information" age.
@@juanmolina2003 do better
as a former pitbull owner
no dog is inherently family friendly.
they are all animals.
some of these dogs are bred for a purpose.
hounds, shepherds, terriers, guarding.
APBT or pit bulldogs were bred for dogfighting.
Thank you
I know someone who had a border collie years ago and it went up the road without any training and got the neighbors cows from up the road and brought them back to her yard
Just naturally did that
They had to straighten it out cuz she had to call the neighbor and tell that the border Collie brought all her cows down to the yard
True story and the classic amongst the people around there
This video is so terribly researched and reasoned I am unsubscribing. You can't be trusted.
I also did just exactly this. Awful journalism.
@@somerandomperson8282ok
It was really upsetting to see this source upend its own credibility
welcome to Vox
Maybe it's AI. Or authentic stupidity.
Even if pitbulls aren’t naturally more likely to bite than other dogs, the veterinarian fact that when they not only have among the strongest bites but literally were breed to not stop biting. Very few large dogs have that trait and that’s what makes them dangerous. If they snap, they have a deadly bite and often won’t stop biting for a long time
Even when kicked, punched, stabbed, tasered, and shot. But Chihuahuas. 😂
Chihuahuas & Retrievers bite the most
@@user-digitalfarmgirl I think that you may have missed the plot if you think that Chihuahuas and Goldens are threatening to us.
@@user-digitalfarmgirl That is the point. No one has ever been killed or even seriously injured by a Chihuahua while thousands of people have been either killed or permanently disfigured and maimed by pit bulls just behaving like they were bred to do.
Unless youve seen the damage these dogs do, and how excited they are to do it AND OFTEN it's these exact dogs, you shouldn't talk on this. Pitbulls that people have as family pets have the instinct of a predator. Once they bite, their jaw locks. I've seen medical textbook images of pitbull attacks. They have literally decapitated babies. There's videos of pitbulls mauling a person and as police are literally shooting the dog, it's tail keeps wagging until it's last breath.
Their jaws don't lock, that's a myth.
@@fatsquirrel75 Technically yes, but have you ever tried to pry a pitbulls jaws off of something? They were bred to have extremely powerful jaw muscles and the drive to not let go of their prey. So yes, physiologically speaking, their jaws don't lock but they have a "lock-like effect."
As a dog trainer, I agree APBT's (and their mixes) are uniquely dangerous. But a dog in distress, or a dog with a high level of energy, will also wag its tail even when in pain. When APBT's maul, they are stressed, but their response to stress can be mauling, and not just a nip. They can go years without ever hurting anyone, but then once they're pushed past threshold, someone is dead.
@@fatsquirrel75 Well not literally of course. There's no lock mechanism there 😂 But they don't let go. Even if you really hurt them.
@fatsquirrel75 they have no skeletal mechanism to lock their jaws, but they will deliberately and famously never let go once they're latched on, to do as much damage as possible. it's what they're bred for.
I am a pediatric neurosurgeon and you wouldn’t believe the injuries and deaths I have seen by dog bites, and yes most of them have been Pit bulls or Am Staffs as they are called here. Please look at statistics when creating a video like this.
They did look at statistics..
Just the wrong ones
@@brianc5581”wrong statistics” aka *“statistics I don’t like 😠”*
@@thefabledfish Statistically you are more likely to be bitten by a chihuahua, and while this is unacceptable, what that dog can do you is not worse than bruising or some punctures. If a pitbull takes a bite of you or your dog, even though it may be less likely, statistically speaking, it's far far far more likely to create a catastrophic injury.
@@kaamos79 that’s not even what I’m arguing. But claiming that any opposition either didn’t use statistics or used the “wrong statistics” is intellectually dishonest.
@@thefabledfish Read the comment above and below yours to gain some understanding.
What a fascinating look into how dishonest and manipulative emotionally-driven pitbull lovers can be. PLEASE do not let your guard down around these dogs people, for your own safety and that of any children you know.
Yep. My mom was biten by one. Of course the owner had no liability..
Projecting your unconquered fear and the way you handle it doesn't make them dishonest.
1. You can't point out what they got wrong because you would have wrote it already.
2. They never said in the video to walk up to random dogs with your guard down.
@@millerrepin4452 are you jewish?
@@millerrepin4452 more like you want to proliferate bioweapons.
@@millerrepin4452 jewish logic lol
Said it 100 times and I'll say it again. How often do you hear about golden retrievers attacking or killing anyone? The breed DOES matter
Dog breeds only have positive genetic traits! How dare you imply that different breeds have negative traits! /s
How often do you hear about golden retrievers being owned by people that mistreat them?
@@Poeticdreaming No amount of training can make some animals bear/lion/tiger pets
@@Konrad_K. Almost like garbage dogs are attractive to garbage people
@@user-pm7fv9dt6j Exactly. No amount of training can make a bloodsport dog a pet.
This is the type of videos that makes me doubt the info in your other videos.
Really bad "journalism" here.
Same
I just saw this and lost all respect for Vox. This is extremely dishonest "journalism".
Same. After years wwtching Vox, this was a disgrace and an insult to all those dead/maimed by pitbulls
Horribly one sided piece with fundamentally flawed arguments.
And comments keep going missing....
@@TheStabbyCyclist do better
Where am from, pitbulls have been banned since 1992. And for a very good reason.
I almost never comment on CZcams. This is just bad journalism.... And all the dog attacks I've personally experienced have been pit pulls. They are in shelters in droves for a reason. They are the most fatal dog attacks for a reason.
Because of all the horrible maulings they tend to do.
"collies are the smartest breed!" same person twenty seconds later "you cant generalize breeds"
100%
@@SatiricalSpartan Good thing we've got actual statistics on attacks so we don't have to generalize about those dead and injured.
@@tinkergnomad impressive retention of information and critical thinking skills on your part. Good job!
I smell a tu quoque fallacy 👃
I am sory but the only 2 dogs to have given me nerve damage and killed my cats IN MY HOUSE have been pit bulls. It's not the personality, its the fact that they are so hard to regain control of WHEN it happens, not if.
Facts bro Vox was totally one sided on this video
They always say wouldn’t hurt a fly.
Yet they never want to talk about cats, birds, squirrels, etc.
99% of these pit owners would not leave the dog alone in a room with a cat, if it were on camera and everyone could see what happens.
It took three adult humans to get a pitbull to unlatch from my dog. It had already bitten two other dogs in less than a year, mine being the third.
@@JayCray421then I'd say that neither of the 3 knew how to handle a large breed dog , or aggressive one . I won't have any other breed besides pit bull . But they have to be trained right because they are bull headed at times and if you let them get away with that kind of behavior , they'll think it's OK to repeat it over & over . But once trained , they made great family pets .
Funny how I open reddit after watching this video and the first thing I see is a post titled "pitbull attacks a woman in Brazil"
What about the thousands of unreported chihuahua bites! Sure one person got ripped in half but what about all the tiny cuts and superficial tooth marks?
/s
That video was so sad. The street dog is a hero though and saved her life, and was probably ripped apart by the pitbull off camera.
@Zarrykotter You're level sarcasm, and timing is of the scale!
@@Zarrykotter you gave me a flashback to that epic r/banpitbulls moment when that guy tried to act like 21,000 people had been killed by chihuahuas and his source was a wikipedia page about people who have died in the mexican state of chihuahua.
It happens all the time, this video is ridiculous. They ignored every stats about DEATHS by dogs
Small dog bite: annoying
Pitbull bite: death
Pretty clear
German Shepherd bite also death. What's your point?
@@RobinHood70German shepherds are on those same bsl lists, insurance blacklists, and landlord blacklists. What’s your point?
@@jacobbwalters8133 Because they were the media designated "scary breed" before pit bulls.
@@RobinHood70and yet they don’t cause fatal attacks anywhere near as often as pit bulls. That’s the point.
@@RobinHood70all violent dogs should be banned or held in special conditions
Missed the mark with this video Vox. Pitbulls are dangerous.
It’s the owners… every pitbull I’ve ever met is sweet and kind. They are actually really in touch with their emotional side and love kids as well.. sorry if you’ve had a bad experience with any pits
@@AlexGonzalez-ye9pcreal life is not a Disney movie 😂 dogs bred to fight like to fight
@@AlexGonzalez-ye9pc And half the pitbulls I've met lounged at any other small dog they saw and even people. What's your point?
not once did they mention dogfighting in the history section of the video
Totally irrelevant detail. It's not like THE ACTUAL NAME OF THE BREED IS AN ALLUSION TO PIT FIGHTS right?
Or the 150 years of selective breeding for aggression
Now they'll try to paint everything as "racist cultural myths cimented by the movies" when in reality pitbulls indeed are responsible for the majority of dog attack deaths despite being less than 10% of domestic dog population.
Dogs aren't people, we can't attribute social inequality and societal failures for the aggression in these animals, they just _are_ different from other dogs. Their breed is literally classified as "fight dogs", they were specifically bred over centuries to be used in dogfighting. Artificially bred to be as aggressive, deadly, and resistent as possible.
What will woke capitalism try to sell us next, that tigers are actually cuddly kitty cats and if you think otherwise you're a racist influenced by white supremacy in pop culture?
I literally know myltiple people that were mauled pr their children were mauled by pitbulls, 2 of whom are now dead and 0 people who have been involved in a shark attack so Im gonna hard disagree with you on this tale Vox.
Let's get real. Pits and other famously aggressive dogs account for like 15% of pets in America but nearly 90% of the dog related deaths. That's the problem. Denying that is foolish
despite being 15% of the population....they over half the violent toddler eating.
But they asserted that BSL against pitbulls is racist, so I guess that's the debate
This is an ignorant statement. It is ultimately the owner and/or humans who are responsible for dog related deaths. Chiwawas and other smaller dogs are known for being mean and nip at people all the time. Personally, I've never ran into a mean pit bull, they were always sweethearts.
@@GattlingCombo Read my comment again. You completely missed my point. Completely.
@@GattlingCombo a chihuahua nipping you will not cause irreversible damage like a pitbull.
Wow you guys are really ignoring all the vicious attack pitbulls do 😒
Wow, Vox completely missed the mark.
It's not about the number of bites, it's about the damage caused.
The risk doesn't lie in these dogs' temperament, but rather in their strength.
I hope you guys review your take on this.
The line everyone seems to be ignoring is "there's no evidence that pit bulls are inherently dangerous". I knew someone attacked pretty badly by a husky. I'm not prejudice against that breed. The point of this video was to soften the negative perception of the breed. Clearly any huge damage done the dog should be dealt with. I think what Vox missed was the dog owner needs to be more responsible. If you have a dog that you know bites, you need to do something about it before an incident happens
Imagine being so disingenuous that you compare a Pitbull attack with a Chihuahua 🤦
@@Paragon-su8jtPitbulls have been more prevalent in violent attacks than any other breeds. Especially toward small children
@@Paragon-su8jt when huskies account for over 66% of all human fatalities, then it would make sense for you to be wary of the breed. People don’t just pick on pit bulls for no reason.
@@Paragon-su8jt what clearly happened is that someone noticed lots of severe incidents involving pitbulls. That was because they were everywhere, many of which were poorly trained. Someone mistook it for "this breed is inherently dangerous, there are more bites by them than by Labradors".
I totally get the point, I wouldn't feel comfortable having my little daughter in the same park as a unmuzzled big dog, pitbull or not
Was this the best you could do research-wise?
@@iehdontknow do better
Did Denmark also have a racial problem that associated danger with pitbulls? If not, can you elaborate on why other countries are banning this breed?
Can you elaborate on the research into the number fatalities caused by different breeds, and the relative percentage of populations of the breeds?
They could have thus elaborated with a few seconds of research, but they have an agenda, so they didn't want to.
@@WangMingGefr, everything has a motive behind it.
Pay no attention to the mauling behind the curtain.
Awful journalism. I’ll be unsubscribing thanks
Ok Scotty nobody cares or asked 😂😂😂😂😂
@@samolbe6845 Seemingly you did considering you took the time to respond
Same
@@samolbe6845I care, and so do you. You replied.
@@samolbe6845 spoken like a pit bull apologist
0 statistics in this video, no matter if you agree or disagree with the premise of the video it would be nice to have some statstics from Europe where we have to register dogs so the numbers are more accurate
4:04
5:32 & 5:40
Yup; there is a lot of saying "statistics about biting breeds don't matter when it is difficult to pin down breed" but then they claim that pitbulls are one of the most popular breeds; if they can identify a pitbull to determine its popularity then they can identify them for bites.
@@kathrynchristiansen It's goalpost shifting. "Ackchyually there is no 'pitbull'." "Sweet pibbles was just scared and that's why he mauled that cat/maltese/infant"
you should probably take this video down
Pretty flimsy video tbh. As others have noted, whether small dogs bite as much or more commonly than pit bulls is not relevant. The severity + the frequency is what matters. Hence why you don't see calls to ban golden retrievers or labs or other dogs that are equivalent in size to pit bulls. Also, just because a pit bull is sweet to its owner doesn't mean it won't be aggressive to "perceived" threats. Tired of hearing pitbull owners tell us how sweet their pitty is and then you try and pet it and it snaps at your hand lol.
You can’t apply human identity politics to dogs. 😢
I knew this was going to be a great piece of journalism when they found a way to conflate pit bulls with racism.
They’re applying the *coverage* of these dogs based on a larger cultural context that was expanded upon in the video.
@@thefabledfish Which is a nonsensical false equivalency with no relevance to lethal pets and their antisocial effects
@@thefabledfish So you agree then that their coverage is farcical and intellectually dishonest? Lol
@@RustyShackleferd-2 they’re talking about the *coverage* of the issue in the beginning. How the media manipulates the issue, not the issue itself. The issue itself comes in the middle of the video.
Wow, Vox. I'm a big fan, but you really failed here. There is so much flawed with this video that it should be withdrawn.
Yeah, rare L from them
Flawed? Name 5 things that are flawed…you can’t
It's just wild how many purse-pomeranian karens there are commenting on this video
This actually the most wth Vox drop I've ever seen. Pitbull pr????? BAN THEM ALL!!
A day after posting an incredibly balanced video of Kamala Harris that was excellent, Vox posts a video that cites a few studies on dog bites (that don't mention fatality rates) and interviews only from people with clear biases.
Editors must have fallen asleep for this one.
Shush 😂😂😂😂
3:21 Best Friends profits from anti-BSL positions. Vox is carrying water for a lobbying group.
Has to be satire
Pitbulls are illegal in my country. For a reason.
In many countries they are not illegal, but pitbulls cannot stay outside.
Pitbulls are banned in nearly 40 countries and it’s all just a big coincidence. 🤷♂️
Dogs breeds are the perfect experiment of how behaviors are genetically influenced so yeah, a dog bred to be aggressive will be, to no-one's surprise, aggressive in general
That is the very crux of what pit-bull defenders believe. It's a philosophy about life itself, the idea that you are purely societally influenced, genetics don't play a role in behaviour, or at least negative behaviour. The hypocrisy is so frustrating. You'll have pitbull defenders boast about how different breeds have different positive qualities, but when it comes to negative - it doesn't exist and could never.
and also how genes and culture interact (gene-culture coevolution)
@@normietwiceremoved Amennnnnnn!
@@normietwiceremoved This is the thing that gets me. You can't say "border collies are more loyal than other dogs" and say "pitbulls aren't more aggressive" and be internally consistent.
Except "dog breeds" are the result of massive inbreeding the likes of which has been prevented in most human societies for thousands of years. "Perfect experiment" if your standards are lower than a snake's cloaca.
If a pit bull turns nasty, then you're in a lot of trouble. That reason alone is enough to ban them.
You just never know when they'll snap.
@@An.Individual By that logic we would also have to ban lions, tigers, bears, crocodiles...
@@3enegerling773We don't usually have those animals breaking out of backyards.
@@3enegerling773 aren't those animals already banned? Florida is trying to shut down the lifeline of the reptile hobby there with new laws.
How big of a check did the best friends animal society cut to Vox?
By Best Friends Animal Society you mean the Process Church of the Final Judgment right? LOL
Note: apparently Vox was recently acquired by the same media group as The Dodo. :c
Something feels... off about the tone of this narration.
They might not have higher danger of biting someone, but when they DO, they cause more damage, that's why they should be a controlled breed. If you compare to sharks like she did, you get bit a lot by fish in rivers and the sea, no one cares, but with a shark, a bite is a bite.
Now this is the only good argument I've read in the comments
@@Dan1elAndrade must you reply to everyone? Go outside, Tyrone
Then ban Rottweilers, great Danes, greyhounds, and every other large breed.
What so because you are frightened by sensationalized news media. Other people shouldn’t be able to own that type of dog?
Hitler talked a lot about controlled breeds too...
Genuinely bad journalism here
Well, it is Vox. But yeah, this felt like something the dodo would release.
why?? are dogs not allowed to eat babies?😠
@@KevinKiejkoVox bought the Dodo recently
@@mateobarrett6829I don’t know anything about the Dodo. What’s up with them?
@@Eli-ss9gj animal feel-good stories who regularly whitewash pitbulls
Worst video Vox has ever made
Why?
Because it doesn't align with their preconceptions about pitbulls@@TheRealVetness
FAX
@@Soguwe 😆
@@Soguwebecause it lacks facts and stats. Its an ad.
How cocaine got its bad reputation?
Deleted this video and admit you guys got paid for this fluff piece. Focused on Total bites and not fatal bites? It’s the fact that when a Pit snaps it has one of if not the strongest bites AND breed to not stop biting why they are so dangerous
🙄
Who is paying them? Pitbull breeders?
Mostly likely Best Friends Animal Society, whom they interviewed in this video. @@gmodrules123456789
@@gmodrules123456789and peta
@gmodrules123456789 pitbull advocacy groups who want to adopt out pitbulls to as many families as possible, because 90% of dogs in shelters are some type of pit. they know many well-meaning people are ignorant about the danger of the breed. shelters already lie about bite history and mislabel pitbulls deliberately. if you go to your local shelter page right now, i can guarantee that you will see many obvious pits labeled as "lab mix" or "husky mix" or other breeds that they only bear a passing resemblance to.
This video belongs on a "how to lie and mislead with statistics" compilation. You deliberately change the parameters of what people are concerned about, from dog attacks resulting in injury to dog attacks resulting in death. This is actually really beneath your quality bar.
Honestly, the insinuation that having concerns about pit bulls makes you racist was disingenuous
Just look at the statistics, are they overrepresented in fatal dog attacks?
Vox is allergic to statistics that don't support their case
Yes, why?
Your argument got addressed in the video btw
@@Dan1elAndradeby address you mean lampshaded.
Yes, pitbulls are more dangerous then other breeds and literally bred for violence.
All I know is that the only 2 times dogs charged at me to the point where I had to call for help, those dogs had the wide mouthed, tiny eared, big head, big chest, look. They were not especially big, but they wanted to maul me. They certainly looked like a part of the pit bull breed. When a dog charges you it is not going to end well.
Did they bite you?
You just misidentified some chihuahuas.
@@KevinKiejko The same chihuahuas that are up your bumhole ?
Here's a friend of Vox, Lauren the responsible pitbull owner with her pitbull unleashed at the park in the picnic area. Why do apartments ban pitbulls? Because of people like Lauren! Oh & the insurance companies who won't insure them.
@@terrywilson4166 also lying on forms about it being a “mixed breed” lol
Insurance companies fully understand.
@Eli-ss9gj it's always a "lab mix" (aka 80%-100% pit but he kind of has the same coloring as a yellow lab so it counts)
@@vitalucas9452math does not care about feelings and they have a lot of professionals on staff who understand math, yes
Generally, I find Vox videos to be well thought-out. This is not one of those videos.
Agreed
The only dog I have ever been properly attacked and bit by was a Pitbull, same goes for my sister. The attack was unprovoked, we were both playing in an open field. I'm sure they can be sweet but the fact that we were both attacked as children will forever change how I perceive them. They have a prey drive that extends to humans, and that's unacceptable.
A pitbull recently ran up and bit my stepmom on the leg. It just happened out of nowhere while she was on a walk in her neighborhood.
I lived next door to a house that had a pitbull. I think they tied him up during the day, but when I got home at night and had to go up the street, which was extremely steep, he was at the entrance. He saw me and started barking and running, it was clear he wanted to attack me. The gate was short. Every time I was scared to death that he would be able to jump and break free. As the street was very steep, I always thought it would be impossible for me to get to my house before him, so I used to think about what I should protect if that happened. I lived there for a short time and that was a big reason for me to move. I knew if he managed to get out I was doomed.
Their prey drive is TERRIFYING! When they decide to go for it, nothing short of un-aliving can stop them. That is why people are afraid
I got bit by a lab retriever while walking back to my car, absolutely terrifying bc he was twice my size
And the plural of anecdote is not data.
The amount of misinformation in this video is stunning. Not up to my usual expectations for Vox videos.
Vox has been backsliding on journalistic integrity for a few years now. The enshitification of news media has been tragic to say the least
I am reporting this video as Misinformation
Same!
misinformation that could result in serious harm or fatality
Exactly. It dodges pit bull fatalities by talking about overall bite statistics. There is no comparison. In the 15-year period of 2005 through 2019, canines killed 521 Americans. Pit bulls contributed to 66% (346) of these deaths. Combined, pit bulls and rottweilers contributed to 76% of the total recorded deaths.
How is it misinformation though?
I'm pretty sure CZcams simply ignores that complaint or even PROMOTES videos that get enough complaints because it proves engagement. CZcams only want's ad revenue.
This is "journalism"? Where was a single interview for the opposition against Pit Bulls? This reeks of a colleague (perhaps that "friend of Vox) using their position to get a story out.
Vox was recently acquired by the same media group that owns the Dodo, who regularly whitewash "pitties."
Waiting for that "How malaria carrying mosquitoes got a bad rep" video, guys.
Cause they don't cause it. They just deliver it
@@fep_ptcp883 and the cause of delivery is?:
😂😂🤣
"Well, if keep a tiger well behaved it will be ok, right?"
'Listen it's really sad your face got ripped off but did you know my baby Nala isn't even a pitbull she's an american chungus terrier black lab cross ACTUALLY, and anyway pitbulls were bred to be nanny dogs so clearly you spooked her triggering her PTSD'
And "nanny dog" doesn't appear in literature prior to 1975. You would think a PhD could have uncovered that. Oh wait.... it goes against her thesis so we'll just omit it.
Yep. This is how they act
Why is it always 'Nala'?
It has to stop. They can be banned and they'll only live a decade tops. Then it's over.
@@scooter-wy3qsprobably some congo derived name who knows
As someone coming into this video with no knowledge about dogs, I'm only hearing the argument that "they're not dangerous, you're just supposed to train them!" but they didn't address whether they are inherently more aggressive or not, which is what I wanted to know. By not addressing it, I think they kind of answered the question though.
Guess you need to actually listen to the whole video
@@sihr07 they did not address it in the video. Nice try though.
One of worst vox videos.
I think its the worst. Never they were that dishonest.