Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.

Well Ordered Set : Explained with Examples | Well Ordering Relation

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 24. 02. 2021
  • In this video, we discuss some examples and non examples of well ordered sets.

Komentáře • 27

  • @Satvik__Jain
    @Satvik__Jain Před 4 měsíci +1

    wonderful explaination

  • @TheAkhilamascreen
    @TheAkhilamascreen Před 2 lety +3

    Found this video really helpful ! Good teaching style

  • @RahulYadav-624
    @RahulYadav-624 Před 2 lety +3

    Kudos to such explaination.
    Commenting just to appreciate your way of explaination 😄

  • @soumyabharadwaj1890
    @soumyabharadwaj1890 Před 2 lety +2

    i understood it completely, thanks

  • @user-fr8yk4su2x
    @user-fr8yk4su2x Před 3 lety +2

    To the point!perfectly understood this...thank you!

  • @Codist_00
    @Codist_00 Před 11 měsíci +1

    What does mean of least element i didn't understand

  • @notoppland
    @notoppland Před 2 lety +1

    Fantastic video, good example that made it clear

  • @aadibmafaz8702
    @aadibmafaz8702 Před 10 měsíci +1

    what is the meaning of a totally ordered set?

  • @martin6276
    @martin6276 Před 9 měsíci

    Incredible! Thank you

  • @TarunKumar-mn7in
    @TarunKumar-mn7in Před 8 měsíci

    Great explanation 👏

  • @AlexAlex-nx4jx
    @AlexAlex-nx4jx Před 3 lety +1

    What if ‘greater than or equal ‘ to had a ‘finite set ‘ ,will it be well ordered

    • @learnwithsreyas1777
      @learnwithsreyas1777  Před 3 lety +1

      Yes, if the set is in such a way that, there is an element which is greater than or equal to all the elements in that set, then ya.
      For example, take the set {1,5,7,9} with relation "greater than or equal to" . It is well ordered, as 9 is greater than every other element.
      The main two conditions are:
      1. The set S together with relation R, i.e (S,R) should be a Totally Ordered set.
      2. Every non empty subset of S should have a least element with respect to the relation R. (For eg, element 'a' belonging to set S is a least element with respect to relation R, if aRb ,for all 'b' belongs to S.)
      If these two conditions are met, then it is well ordered.

  • @y.8901
    @y.8901 Před rokem

    Hello, does the least element need to be element of the subset or not ? And by the way, is the poset (Z+, |) a well ordered set ? I would say no because if I take the subset {2,3}, there is no least element. Am I right ? Thanks in advance.

    • @Codist_00
      @Codist_00 Před 11 měsíci

      Firstly its not an totally ordered set because its elements are not comparable

  • @koushikdeka8054
    @koushikdeka8054 Před 2 lety +1

    sir, how to show that subset of a well ordered set need not be well ordered

    • @learnwithsreyas1777
      @learnwithsreyas1777  Před 2 lety

      Why do you think, that a subset of well ordered set need not be well ordered? If the statement "every subset of well ordered set is well ordered" was false, then, you can always show that by a counter example. Take a well ordered set, and take a subset of it, which is not well ordered. Then, you are done. But, I don't think the statement you mentioned is true. I think, every subset of a well ordered set is well ordered. Correct me, If am wrong. Anyway, to show every subset is also well ordered, showing examples won't work, that, you have to prove in general. Hope, I have made the point.

  • @PreetiKumari-mx2jg
    @PreetiKumari-mx2jg Před 3 lety +1

    Hello sir...plz reply
    Is there any proof of
    'Every set can be well ordered '

  • @sajidmunir9672
    @sajidmunir9672 Před 2 lety

    Super explain sir

  • @debendrakumarsahoo9304

    Thank u so much sir, you are doing great job again many many thank u 🙏🙏🙏 sir🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙇🏼🙇🏼🙇🏼🙇🏼🙇🏼🙇🏼🙇🏼🙇🏼🙇🏼🙇🏼🙇🏼🙇🏼🙇🏼🙇🏼🙇🏼🙇🏼