Having a confirmed British flamer of a thespian give a dramatic reading on the art of seduction by a rascally, rakish straight male gives true bearing to the old adage: judge not the performer, but judge his or her art. The adage is my own, the sentiment universal.
@@johnbremner4154 these things are a matter of personal taste I suppose.... but I much prefer this version by an amature: czcams.com/video/8w4yLaM5EBk/video.html
It is bad because it does not work read like that . I have yet to hear anybody do it justice and , before you ask , I can't recite it correctly . I am searching for a proper recital .
My students are listening to this now. I hope they can appreciate its beauty.
Or it's cynicism. 😉 Listen closer.
Yea, tho a flamer he may be, beautiful words spoken written from a beau heart turned on to me by a beautiful brother
Having a confirmed British flamer of a thespian give a dramatic reading on the art of seduction by a rascally, rakish straight male gives true bearing to the old adage: judge not the performer, but judge his or her art. The adage is my own, the sentiment universal.
great
Would like to hear Martin Shaw read this.
Beautiful
Why is no one reading with the iambic tetrameter?
Now we just say “u up?”
Anyone from India?
Agree this is awful: total ham!
Shockingly bad rendition by the famous actor!
Why is it bad?
@@breeeegs No emotion!
@@johnbremner4154 these things are a matter of personal taste I suppose.... but I much prefer this version by an amature: czcams.com/video/8w4yLaM5EBk/video.html
@@myracharleston8119 You are right. This rendition is much better.
It is bad because it does not work read like that . I have yet to hear anybody do it justice and , before you ask , I can't recite it correctly . I am searching for a proper recital .