How Likely Is War Over Taiwan?

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 31. 05. 2024
  • The Michael Shermer Show # 436
    Are we in a new Cold War? Today on the show, George Takach discusses the historical context of Cold War 1.0 and contrasts it with the current geopolitical landscape, focusing on the role of artificial intelligence in the new battle between China, Russia, and America. He also explores the potential conflict between China and Taiwan, the role of the US military in the region, and the interdependence of global economies.
    George Takach is the author of the new book Cold War 2.0: Artificial Intelligence in the New Battle between China, Russia, and America. For forty years, he practiced technology law at McCarthy Tétrault, Canada’s premier law firm. He holds a bachelor’s degree in history, political economy, and philosophy from the University of Toronto; a graduate degree from the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs at Carleton University; and a law degree from the University of Toronto.
    SUPPORT THE PODCAST
    If you enjoy the podcast, please show your support by making a $5 or $10 monthly donation.
    www.skeptic.com/donate/
    #michaelshermer
    #skeptic
    Listen to The Michael Shermer Show or subscribe directly on CZcams, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, and Google Podcasts.
    www.skeptic.com/michael-sherm...
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 37

  • @patrickl6932
    @patrickl6932 Před 23 dny +2

    Powerful Shermer with another great episode!

  • @MsMrshanks
    @MsMrshanks Před 22 dny

    You always ask the right questions Michael. Thankyou gentleman...

  • @chb762
    @chb762 Před 18 dny +1

    For anyone interested, this book takes a deep dive into the topic:
    "Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China" by Hal Brands

  • @hertslaura2175
    @hertslaura2175 Před 13 dny

    This is so interesting! Thank you for this engaging discussion! It very interesting to hear your thoughts and appreciate how you dialogue with each other.

  • @jasoncrawford1489
    @jasoncrawford1489 Před 16 dny

    The approach of refusing to trade would probably be more complicated than indicated here for several reasons. (1) What happens if the great innovation happens on their side of the wall, not ours? There does seem to be plenty of innovation happening there first already. (2) In the case of China, for various reasons, they are better at keeping trade secrets from us than we are at keeping them from them.

  • @InnaConceptcreativeStore

    Thank you for the interesting discussion! As someone who has not left Kyiv since the beginning of the war, I can say that many Western countries & producers have not stopped the delivery of their equipment that can be used in Russian missiles and Russian industry (there are so many reports about the military equipment found in Russian missiles bought after 2022 and used to bomb Ukraine). Thus, there will be similar "business as usual" with the Chinese companies in the case of Chinese war. Because ... yeah, those Western producers have workers, their workers have kids and those kids should be fed and live their happy lives. They don't care about a bunch of Ukrainian kids who lost their limbs or their lives because of that Western equipment. I don't believe the situation will change unless, probably, the Western parents having small kids whose lives they are are afraid to lose if something more serious happens, will actively protest against such "businesses as usual". Pretty much like the society protested against "dirty money" kept in some European banks (banks had no problems with those money, but the civil society had). Greetings from Kyiv and let's hope for seeing some rational behavior and strategic thinking in the society (don't think the politicians or such "business as usual" producers have it ;)).

  • @homewall744
    @homewall744 Před 22 dny

    Maybe Netanyahu wanted this attack because look at what he's done, all his goals for decades.

  • @soblamsebastien1366
    @soblamsebastien1366 Před 22 dny

    👏👏👏

  • @siamakkhodadoust6393
    @siamakkhodadoust6393 Před 23 dny +1

    In my opinion one should not invite someone for dinner if that someone has not much interest in other person feelings and interests.

  • @ehsantorabie3611
    @ehsantorabie3611 Před 16 dny

  • @tuckerbugeater
    @tuckerbugeater Před 22 dny

    "This wouldn't have happened if we did x.." BS. This was destined to happen!

  • @remitemmos9165
    @remitemmos9165 Před 21 dnem +3

    wow, usually enjoy your interviews but really this time I found it was so cliché... this vision of the cold war and history in general is beyond naive and superficial... I had to five up when you asked (for the second time!) why Xi doesn't just buy stuff from Taiwan instead of wanted to invade...
    This level of ignorance of history/culture, whether or not you support Taiwan's autonomy's claim is crazy. I don't know even on Taiwanese that would ask this question nor think that it's only Xi that wants to reunite China with Taiwan!
    and well everything else on the cold war is at the same level... really dissapointed in this episode... stick to science or invite Mearsheimer to atone for your sin :)
    PS: I'm half serious of course, still interesting discussion but quite painful for anyone who's old enough and educated enough to challenge basically anything said on the cold war 1.0 and then be more than skeptic about the cold war 2.0 discourse...

  • @Ifishmo
    @Ifishmo Před 23 dny +3

    The 'machine that makes the chips' (the ASML EUV tool)...is only one step of the process, he's talking about the photo litho step/equipment (still need dry/wet etch, CVD, Diffusion, Implant, CMP, Metro etc etc). Saying it's the 'chip making machine' is showing how this guy literally knows nothing on how semiconductor fabs work, makes me question the rest of anything else he says...sorry-forever a skeptic ;)

    • @MsMrshanks
      @MsMrshanks Před 22 dny +1

      Don't be too pedantic for your own good brother...

  • @tinymutantsquid
    @tinymutantsquid Před 22 dny +3

    I enjoyed the conversation, but I think these two are laying it on a little thick putting Trump in the same category as autocrats Putin and Xi Jinping, enough so that it hurts the credibility of the rest of the analysis.

  • @aminam9201
    @aminam9201 Před 21 dnem

    this one too is a thief “Al consciousness cannot exist | Markus Gabriel
    10 months ago consciousness
    The Institute o...” typical British thieves (collective theft)!

  • @homewall744
    @homewall744 Před 22 dny

    The only language the US understands is force.