Cameron meets Netanyahu: ‘No one wins’ in war with Iran
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 04. 2024
- “I don’t think there’s a terrible lot of love lost there.”
David Cameron’s meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu will show no “love lost” as the foreign secretary repeats the sentiment from the US on Iran, says Zach Anders and Arieh Kovler.
📻 Listen to Times Radio - www.thetimes.co.uk/radio
📍 Subscribe to our channel - / @listentotimesradio
🗞 Subscribe to The Times www.thetimes.co.uk/subscribe/...
📲 Get the free Times Radio app www.thetimes.co.uk/radio/how-...
Cameron getting his instructions from his boss
Iran has 300000 drones. Lets see what the response will be if Israel sends a message.
On the other hand, Israel has far better military equipment, including a nuclear option🙃
Stop making jokes .this is war. No proxies!
Try '5000'.
@barriewilliams4526 how do you know Iran doesn't have nukes too? Don't you think they would've already been attacked if they didn't have a nuke or two?
“USA has an *invested* interest” ain’t that the truth
Thanks Zack and well spoken 👍🇬🇧👍
I love people from Iran and Israel.
You can't continuing BITTING the hands that feeds you
All of this could have been avoided if we with the Americans didn’t prevent the Security Council from condemning Israel attack on the Iranian consulate . . . Being scared of ever criticising Israel isn’t healthy for our country
True.
Gosh it is just that simple!
@@kurtwicklund8901it actually is and there's precedent. Similar thing happened in Afghanistan with respect to Iran. When the security council doesn't act, states invoke their right to self defence.
@@kurtwicklund8901 it really is. Iranians initially tried to resolve diplomatically. We refused and now we act like we are doing everything to stop any escalations.
Funny because I have heard a growing pressure campaign that implicitly criticises Israel in public, having lost patience with private diplomatic methods.
That's just incredible to think a security council resolution that gives MORE basis to attack not less.
It just means Iran quotes the resolution as part of their justification.
That also concedes the Israeli contention that the brass plate was not on a real consulate but used by the IRG which given who the casualties were has some plausibility.
Many Tories are deluded and Sir Alan Duncan is plausible when he says they are not committed to the actual policy that is consistent with international law.
The USA and even less UK have no magic wands to order a beleaguered but sovereign Israeli government into line, Netanyahu is another hard right populist who faces corruption and played the populace with a strongman security through strength and no compromise approach.
50 injured, including three children in Chernihiv. This is the same war!
0:11 Meaning A direct confrontation with Iran ...
the 2 that refuses to resign at public call outs
❤Lord Cameron he is still looking for a way forward he's beautiful inside and out
He should keep out of it we have no military alliance with Israel
Dave’s auntie should stop posting comedic messages on RubeTube Inc.
@@user-hw1mn7qk2n no but UK has strong diplomatic ties with Israel and as Foreign Secretary he's doing his job
He has no vision! If Iran sets up nuclear weapons will have that same problem we have with Russia! Worse in fact . It is imperative that Israel destroys that possibility now! Cameron is a blind passifist. Chamberlain the second 1938.
@@user-hw1mn7qk2n ok blind fool! We already have a problem with Russian threats. We don’t need Iran with nooks. Never delay today in the hope you can do it tomorrow .
Yea, US should step up and not be as timid on supporting people longing for peace. There are people of good will in every nation.
“For a certainty I perceive that God is not partial, but in every nation the man that fears him and works righteousness is acceptable to him.”-
What is Israel's end game if they lash out with a hawkish response?
When they say in this area of the middle east you cannot forego retaliation, the logic applies equally to other countries. How many other countries have this level of hostility from Arab populace?
Have they clung on to occupied land and invaded neighbours in punitive actions where refugees fled to?
What has Saudi Arabia gained out of its war in the Yemen with Iranian backed forces?
Israel faces being worn down and wearing out the support of allies, in a long term worsening strategic position. Having destabilised and destroyed the most moderate factions, Netanyahu is dooming Israel in the long run.
The footage of that missile attack shows the missiles flying over the city, if the city was the target they would of been hitting targets already. Only 1 person was harmed by being hit by falling debris. So if they were flying over the city and not into it what was their ultimate target destination because if you were going to hit the city, those things were at least 2 miles over the outskirts of the city already....they already had 2 miles of civilian targets they could of hit but didnt ?? Just making an observation, go check the footage.
I think you may have been rhetorical but I believe Iran gave notice of it's intention of targeting military compounds.
WASHINGTON, Jan 29 (Reuters) - Sales of U.S. military equipment to foreign governments in 2023 rose 16% to a record $238 billion, the U.S. State Department
START USING THE WORD RETALIATION! they were forced to after Israel response
“For a certainty I perceive that God is not partial, but in every nation the man that fears him and works righteousness is acceptable to him.”-
We give iran a lot of benefit of the doubt by saying you can't strike an embassy. Certainly you aren't suposed to strike an actual embassy. The question becomes what all these generals were doing in this embassy. Renewing their visa? Picking up new passports? Or was this actually a military headquarters masquerading as an embassy?
Embassies and consulates are routinely used for spooks and covert operations by most countries.they are still sacrosanct and off limits..regardless.
Forgot .. USA /India foot hold in Africa [ NIGERIA ] is in free fall ... guess where i shall play next xoxoxo
Keep in mind that Britain is largely to blame for the utter cockup it made of its League of Nations Mandate on the 14th May 1948. So easy to point fingers now - but the Cameron should consider all the facts before attempting to caution Israel!!
Iran launched a response which was just big enough to score a handful of mostly symbolic hits on a military airbase. Objective fact shows Iran perfectly designed the size of the attack. Even if the missiles are big like the silly nonsense put forth here.
Just take the win Israel. You somehow squandered global good will after the Hamas Oct attack. Does that not give you doubts your path has been wise?
It is not the question of win & loss. If Iran and its allies are not stopped now for their activities the entire globe will face security threats a lot.
Iran is trying their best to develop nuclear weapons which may be used in the warhead of their long range missiles and the same may be accessed by the terrorist groups it is nurturing.
The United Nations should understand this truth and the US and its allies must address these threats at the earliest and notarize those
Israel are obviously the problem in the world
Really
You get excited for 300 ?
Wait for 3000 if Israel responds
I don't know whether you are thinking straight. If Israel decides to respond and this become a prolonged exchange, Iran and iranians will suffer even more. Instead of being so dense try to be rational
@@sailor67duilio27 haha
Good one
Israel attacked Iran first so Iran responded according to the international law
Now if Israel responds that will be an act of aggression and a suicide for them
Obviously it wouldn't serve the people of Israel but only for the benefit of warmongers so they can stay in power instead going straight to prison
@@sailor67duilio27 You forget that Israeli citizens will also suffer. The point about the "3,000" that Iran could use is not being 'irrational'. If Iran wanted to have harmed Israel it could so easily have done. 330 is nothing.
@@rayjames777 Of course, still, if there had not been allies some of these ballistic missiles would have caused damage. In any case, Iran is playing dangerously and the Iron Dome can only improve. We'll see.
@@sailor67duilio27Just as rational as maniac Yahu!
Never thought I could give your propaganda channel a thumbs up, but you deserved it today!!!,👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿❤️❤️❤️
👍
Persia might though, since it was taken over by the theocratic fascist Khomenei regime 1979. Free Persia"!
Propagandist... The Iranian ppl actually ready to trade punches
Perhaps the same way as freeing Palestine by maniac Yahu!
Repeating the same designed scripts again.
Yeah Israel is not allowed to stop Iran so we can have cheaper oil .
There is NO "consensus" that isrl needs to respond. The American president told Bibi no. So you on the tiny island with a small military do not get to decide.
We know from historical facts that whenever Biden says ''Don't'' to someone, they instead ''Do it''
Israel is tiny.Britain is actually a real country.isnotreal is a made up invention.america has huge military but they lose wars cos they pick dumb causes and have dumb leaders.france and uk have europes most capable army and navy.not sure what your re on about.
Netanyahu is not going to take any notice of what "Lord" Cameron has to say. Unlike Cameron, like it or loathe it, Netanyahu is his own man!
Cameron is on the wrong side of history again. Remember the Brexit referendum David??? 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂
The entire world continue to pray for iran ❤
We are praying for Israel that GOD protect his chosen people🙏
Maybe the Iranian people would like the country back from the evil dictator and his terrorist army?
No one win except David Cameron, the great clown 🤡🤡🤡