APEC 12/23: Asymmetrical Capacitance, Warp Drives & Torsion Physics
Vložit
- čas přidán 24. 07. 2024
- David Pares describes a new VEM drive breakthrough, Charles Buhler discusses experimental propulsion results based on asymmetrical electrostatic pressure, Daniel Davis provides an overview of warp-drive propulsion concepts, Andrew Beckwith discusses how torsion may allow for a cosmological constant & Mark Sokol provides updates on DNO Inertial Mass Shielding. We'll also be hearing updates from our lab partners and finishing off the event with an open discussion by conference attendees!
0:00 - Intro
03:40 - Dr. David Pares - VEM Drive Breakthrough
1:01:36 - Dr. Charles Buhler - Propellantless Propulsion
2:04:06 - Daniel Davis - Warp-Drive Research
3:00:28 - Dr. Andrew Beckwith - Torsion & Cosmological Constant
4:00:49 - Mark Sokol - DNO Mass Shielding Experiment
4:21:09 - Lab Updates
4:58:10 - Open Discussion
12pm PT - David Pares - Variable Electromagnetic Drive Breakthrough
In this breaking news update, David Pares will discuss recent upgrades & experimental results for the VEM Drive indicating a repeatable propulsive output of 11.72 Newtons (2.65 lbs) force generated by 1,500 Watts input power during 30-second duration tests - without evidence of ion-wind or electrostatic repulsion, and accompanied by red-shifting effects. For the last seven years, the Quantum Electrodynamics R&D team has been developing a proprietary Variable Electromagnetic (VEM) Drive that they claim compresses the fabric of space, and requires no liquid propellant that chemical or ion drive to move through space.
1pm PT - Charles Buhler - The Discovery of Propellantless Propulsion
Dr. Charles Buhler discusses experimental propulsion results based on asymmetrical electrostatic pressure, in a device described in International Patent# WO2020159603A2. The device is described as a system and method for generating a force from a voltage difference applied across at least one electrically conductive surface. The applied voltage difference creates an electric field resulting in an electrostatic pressure force acting on at least one surface of an object. Asymmetries in the resulting electrostatic pressure force vectors result in a net resulting electrostatic pressure force acting on the object. The magnitude of the net resulting electrostatic pressure force is a function of the geometry of the electrically conductive surfaces, the applied voltage, and the dielectric constant of any material present in the gap between electrodes.
2pm PT - Daniel Davis - Warp-Drive Research
Daniel Davis will discuss the current state of research into warp-drive propulsion, including the challenge of integrating solutions to the engineering challenges of the Alcubierre Drive together from a variety of diverse scientific sources. Davis believes most, if not all, of the fundamental challenges to building a working warp-drive have been solved - but one obstacle to success involves combining solutions proposed by various scientists into a single model.
3pm PT - Andrew Beckwith - How Torsion May Allow For A Cosmological Constant
Andrew Beckwith will discuss how torsion may allow for a cosmological constant, which links the ideas given by Beckwith and QaZi 2023 to a presentation as far as Torsion as given by de Sabbata and Sirvaram, Erice 1990. The 1990 article claims that Torsion cancels Cosmological vacuum energy whereas our formulation leads to a left over cosmological constant 10^-121 times vacuum energy. Meantime speculation as to how all this relates to black hole physics and speculation given by Corda which replaces traditional firewalls with a different formulation are included as that presentation by Corda uses the idea of a quantum number n, which ties into his own Cosmological constant presentation.
4pm PT - Mark Sokol - Dynamic Nuclear Orientation Mass Shielding Experiment
Falcon Space Founder Mark Sokol discusses the original Alzofon DNO experiments and how his team resurrected this technology & has worked in conjunction with David Alzofon to build a new type of propulsion system based on EPR & Dynamic Nuclear Orientation technologies. He will describe the evolution of his research over time & current efforts utilizing advanced testing & measurement equipment.
4.30pm PT - Lab Partners - Experimental Research Updates
Learn about hands-on engineering & technical research on advanced propulsion experiments by our lab partners. Mark Sokol & the Falcon Space team will describe recent work on NMR / EPR gravity-modification experiments, Jarod Yates & Charles Crawford will provide updates on the Graviflyer and other labs will share updates as well during this time.
5pm PT - Open Discussion & Ad-Hoc Presentations
Conference guests interested in presenting experimental info to the group are invited to participate at this time, and our presenters will be available to take questions & discuss experiments. - Věda a technologie
McCulloch's Quantised Inertia explains how it works. See his paper: "Propellant-less Propulsion from Quantized Inertia."
QI has been around for at least 18 years.
@@reinoud6377 I know Mike and I'm sad to say nothing of any value in QI
@@joshuazeidner8419 how come? it explains lots of anomalies. In his new book he examines 50 of them. Esp. now Unruh radiation has been confirmed to exist in experiments it deserves a chance. It might not be perfect but it does explain inertia quite well, something I don't see any other theory do.
Also the force I see in my experiments in this capacitor follows QI's force predictions quite well.
@@reinoud6377 show me one notable physicist whose reviewed that book. not his marketing team accounts like you.
NASA's been using ion thrust for a while now (on probes) and have used it to explain away TTBrown's experiments with emgravitics beginning in the 1920's. (Brown is said to have demonstrated his anti-gravitic technique in a vacuum.) TT used highly charged DC capacitors to induce this later termed "Biefeld-Brown Effect". Brown would not describe his approach as a "warp bubble" -- but as a way to reflect gravitons away (resembling how an aluminum mirror reflects away light). Bob Lazar went on to explain any corresponding propulsive effect as the selective use of gravity via "gravitational wave guides" into an Element 115 resonance chamber as attractive multiplier. Given the technique works, the question becomes whether body-crushing inertia is at play during high-G turns. Assuming inertial-loading is precluded by any emgravitic field, you can probably get away with calling such a field a "warp bubble" -- otherwise probably not...
Hi Tim, long time since we spoke. This is really interesting. Will be looking into.this alot. Thanks.
4:03:17 the 3.99ghz pulse roughly 200 times per second to me almost sounds like a cavity magnetron pulsed 200 times per second instead of the usual 60 times per second in our microwave ovens
Use a T Henry moray generator and eliminate the batteries!
I hope years from now I can refer to this moment when I tell people where I was when this technology was revealed to the world. (4/30/24)
This hoax will be forgotten immediately until another "NASA scientist" comes along claiming the same thing. He's not the first to propose a magic space thruster like this and won't be the last.
@@EnDSchultz1this is kind of the first time that the test thruster demo has ended up IN ORBIT for further testing and to validate the discovery, which is doing extraordinarily well apparently.
It's a New Paradigm 😉👽🛸
@@EnDSchultz1 That could very well be, but the certainty that you display here has been uttered by many scientists in history that turned out to be wrong. A waiting approach is better.
@aaronscottmatthews7883 except it's all bs. He didn't just violate the laws of Physics, he violated the laws of algebra. If you think dividing by 0 is okay, your opinion doesn't matter, anyway.
what if a device that supposedly can modify gravity were to be placed near a LIGO facility? Since the detectors are so sensitive, that might allow a measure of any real world effect of these sort of devices.
They're probably not designed to pick up gravity modifications like that and work on differential not systematic changes in very narrow bandwidths. Our ability to detect gravity changes are extremely limited to a few percent or thousandths for general experiments and even there there are many problems because gravity and acceleration are equivalent by GR so the slightest vibration would be difficult to separate out from a systematic gravity signal. Also any mixture of gravity and electromagnetism would be extremely difficult to detect even if it could be significant. This is because the gravity and electric forces are so vastly different in strength...electric overpowers the other. Engineers shoot for 6 sigma but we would need either billion sigma for the ranges for gravity and electromagnetism we use or else use unrealistic electric field strengths that would vaporize the measuring device. The experiments on neutral antimatter falling down for example are very limited. In fact we don't even know if the simplest charged particle....the electron...falls up or falls down. Buhler is taking a totally different angle to this looking at tiny accelerations over time that add up significantly in space...so that is actually interesting from his setup in exploring uncharted waters and could have practical uses. Regardless of the outcome however it's VERY early days into our exploration of gravity and it's relations to the other forces, and it's more because we haven't explored the parameter space than that we can be certain theyre are not important and useful connections.
What the hell does any of this do that produces warping of the gravitational field beyond what electron mass creates.
Amazing work.
Amazing presentation and report!
@@michaelinzo not really...
I was curious to hear the explanation of how reactionless propulsion was supposedly being achieved - made it to about the 1 hour 37 minute mark where he basically admitted this was just another “perpetual motion” machine (he describes possibly endless acceleration/energy output with no energy input). A force can be applied forever with no energy input (a table holding up a lamp), but to actually impart a velocity change requires energy. If his device produces a stable force while in static equilibrium on a scale with no continuous energy input, that’s fine - doesn’t mean that it can accelerate itself. If the concept was that energy input was required to maintain the charges as the device accelerates, I’d still be on board to hear the rest.
Well no. Electrostatics create acceleration. Balloon, plastic stick. rub. Asymmetry. Effect. But there might be several approaches. Space is a variable dielectric depending on how much it is being doped with impurities (charges). And we know planets at a distance are charged. Hence you can create in principle a charge/force asymmetry resulting in acceleration. We have modern (mathematical) tools / propulsion methods they did not have in the age of the Electricians who invented electrostatic theory.
If you have charge exchange via dielectric breakdown/lossy dielectric you can charge asymmetrically, thrust, equilibrate charge, charge, thrust, etc. So you could get a pulsed mode with a planet; or even a given volume of space with a differential charge upon which you push as ion-impurities at a distance cannot get out of the way instantly. Assymmetry. You seemingly push on nothing, but actually you push on a volume of charged ionic impurities at a distance.
Experiments like this give us a good excuse to refine basic theories. And they claim to have effects (regardless of their own explanation).
So, lets wait and see what comes out of the garage.
I took this to mean it’s like a magnet field which is always “on” but isn’t considered perpetual motion
He didn't say it was perpetual motion. He just said he cannot explain it yet.
@@discoveringthegardenofeden7882 the electrostatic force is real, it can move objects like a balloon as you pointed out. However, it has no application in propulsion. In order to get that charged balloon to move to the moon, you'd have to propel the plastic stick to the moon. It's like putting a fan on the back of a sailboat. Wind pushes sailboats, fans create wind but you can't just add the two together.
@@discoveringthegardenofeden7882 but they aren't reactionless. There's no such thing as a reactionless force..
In my travels, someone in a comment section suggested energy is organization. Organization of what? Perhaps organization of opposite charges? Then bring in scale, the fractal idea, to visualize high order repeated across scale into the small and up into the large, a continuum of nested organization across scale. A higher density of organization of opposites.
Does organized opposites do anything fundamentally different than disorganization across scale? Is there a meta pattern which does something special, as opposed to arbitrary fractal recursion pattern across scale?
Like the Ising model of magnetic materials, ranging from random orientations to aligned, and curiously, the patterns look the same across different scales.
Now look at that idea from the perspective of assembly theory, especially around how bootstrapping works via subassemblies working towards a higher function. Life is doing this kind of thing.
That 137 keeps showing up. If I were him, I’d chase the hell out of that.
One other thing, the field lines look the same for any absolute value, the field contours only show the relative difference. So for all we know, we could be inside a very strong absolute field, without realizing it. It would be funny if it turned out we are essentially inside a black hole already, and what we see as black holes are outside ours.
Relative versus absolute, inside and outside. If we assume something like this backwards, something so fundamental, we could be wrong for a very long time.
Maybe the universe of atoms has a pump frequency like the pilot wave of the vibrating plate of silicone droplets does?
It was a good talk, the devil is always in the details.
1:19:25 i need more info about this. Electrostatic Presure Force.
Could this also explain Eugene Podkletnov's findings?
Is it possible to weaponize Exodus drive?
Either we could reduce gravity to a point where it becomes negative, allowing us to rise upwards.
Or, we could install an upward gravity point that sucks the UFO upwards.
Alternatively, we could utilize the surrounding electric charges, turning into an electrostatically propelled helicopter.
Looking forward to your vacuum gravity experiment.
@@user-gy5qo8qh2w how? Lol....
1:20:12 That is true? you get more force in one side than the other just curving it? It apply to wire or just plates? And will not be compensated in the edge of needle? Maybe all electri field go to the sharp edge and from there cancel all the force and equlibrate the both side.
Yes!!
1:40:00 bob lazar sighting! 😂😂
At 28:28 "It only takes 20 watts of power to create two gravity doses inside of the space craft." What is a gravity dose? 20 watts is way below any of their test powers and would produce extremely little force.
It would be helpful of someone could plot the conservation of energy here. It would prove this is at least reasonable.
So much of this is complete nonsense. A few minutes later the guy is talking about achieving faster than light travel in the near future. The description has him listed as Dr. but he has a Master of Science in geology, and seemingly no education in physics or engineering.
So what are the side effects of compressing spacetime?
gravity
You have contradictions in your mechanics.... S is not Ut, it's the integral of the T-U over t, and the Legendre transformation brings you to the Hamiltonian, which is T+U. S=Ut if T=0 and U is constant, in which case v=0.... and you divided by 0... what's really going on here? I think I have a guess, lol.
Can you explain to me what you mean??
@@user-rv8gn5qf3ohe's too full of himself and small minded to acknowledge that Charles Buhler has genuinely created something unprecedented. It will singlehandedly transport us into deep space.
Me too, and I think our guesses are the same, LOL.
@user-rv8gn5qf3o maybe? What is your level of physics education? Basically, he wrote S=Ut and said it was an accepted equation. It isn't. It's false. It violates everything from Newton's laws to the conservation of energy.
Notice OP or any of these people commending him have yet to argue my claim. A real scientist would engage my points.
Please, you do know that the EM wavelengths inside a dielectric (or a body) are REDUCED by the bodies dielectric (body/ n)
My advice is this: You're not time traveling anywhere without a statis field, force field or whatever you want to call it. Otherwise you'll just wind up atomizing yourself, or worse detonate into an atomic explosion or worst case start a black hole that will exterminate our solar system in short order. I think most advance beings have accidently done this already. But there are some that accidently learn to crawl, then stand, then walk, then run, etc and survive this period of experimentation through dumb luck. My advice, focus on the statis field, you'll need it anyways, use it to create a small space where time is temporarily suspended. It only needs to happen for a split second. The earth and the universe is moving very quickly and in a small fraction of a second, the earth will basically move away from you and when then you'll find yourself floating in outer space. Over time you can make this process a way to put large full loaded containers or ships into space super quick and super efficient. As you mature your force field tech and only then you can revisit the time travel and then only practice outside of the solar system. If you can hold the field for a while longer, you can basically travel out as far as you want to, the only problem is the trip back. Think of being in the ocean, you jump off the boat for a quick swim, when you surface, the wind is blowing the boat away and you can't swim fast enough to catch it. You don't want to find yourself too far away or two slow to get back. When you've mastered your forcefield tech like I've pointed out (plus propulsion tech), then other survivors in the universe will make themselves known to you and earth will be on its way to the grandest of adventures and knowledge share. Good luck humans, you'll need it. And don't say you were never warned.
Try changing the angle of the T plates, after all the highest force comes from the corners...
Ties into Billy Meiyer's so-called "beam ship" ? It pulls rather than pushes.
A warp drive 2 stroke engine!
@@jlo13800will it sound like a Yz 250? lol
Build it for fuck sake!
There is a sense here that the results are perplexing and almost betray the knowledge of physics. It's hard to believe that with electrical energy you can "bend space" a little bit. Isn't this telling us the possibility that this is not bending space but just plainly changing the permittivity of space in which case it may be pointing to new physics, in other others, space is rigid, flat and what changes in space is a change of the permittivity constant.
Edward Teller supposedly told his wife after looking at Townsend Brown's lab experiment: "he is doing something that is not supposed to be possible in physics. I do not know how he does it. " For those who think that something is wrong about the results, pause, there might be something wrong with our models.
Ben Rich told James Goodall "we found an error in the equations. After that, a lot of things were possible|
@pedrosura no, they violate the laws of physics. Take this video to your local college, university, or probably even high school, and whoever teaches physics there can rip it to shreds pretty easily.
@@Scalettadom I am sure it violates what some think are the Laws of Physics. Why do we have Dark energy and dark matter? Because out models dont match observations. So we have fudge factors. Just like we used to have epicycles.
If you are 100% of our current models then I would ask why are you so certain?
this is mindblowing stream! estatic drive is amazing!
At 2.14.49 Davis describes a paper that is completely wrong in my opinion.All of these "aerodynamic" papers are wrong. Also the metrics used are external detector/observer metrics which are causally disconnected from the local metric field inside the rest frame of the warp bubble confined to the rigid thin shell of the warp craft. The external detectors see a scrambled distorted Coney Island fun house mirror gravity lensed distortion of the actual local situation in the fuselage. Those wrongly conceived papers assume FTL motion relative to the virtual particles in the quantum vacuum. That contradicts the basic idea of warp drive as the relative tilting of the light cones in 4D space-time given by Roger Penrose. He has the blue shift in the front which is wrong. That confuses the motional Doppler with the gravity shift which acts in the opposite way as Dan correctly showed in his earlier picture with the gravity well in the front and the anti-gravity hill in the back of the warp bubble.
Positive energy warp bubble wouldn't have the "anti gravity hill" at the back. I can email you the paper in question if youd like.
Using modern mu-metal magnetic shielding, including active fingerprint coil shields, it's possible to bring the ambient field inside an experimental volume down to a few nT. Try your device in there. With no external magnetic field to push against, it won't be doing much, I would say.
You need to send Bluebird after Oumaumau with a high rez camera!!!!!!
710 millinewtons using 17 watts with our small prototype. We are working on 5 newtons of thrust for 200 watts.
I built my own device independently to this following Mike's work and got 1.6mN at an estimated 0.6 milliwatt (ex high voltage generation costs) ie at 2.45N/Watt. Scaling up with enhanced materials in the planning.
17 Watt is quite some juice and 0.710N is a great result
what frequency are you guys using? judging from the engine and the components I'm seeing I assume about 1ghz.
Copier technology uses a corona wire to place a static charge unto mylar drums, could that same tech be used on Drews mylar sails for his perpetual motion machine? Don't kill me with negative comments please, just watched this video thread moments ago while listening to Glen Becks interview with Buhler, Buehler...lol
They are talking space. but all I’m thinking is hoverboard … hoverboard please, say it.
What Is a Warp Bubble, is A Chrage Tranmited Field Of Energy, That Ben Gravity And Light But Not A Warp Drive Motor, The Chrage Transmited Field Of Energy Is connected To A Magnet. That Change It Energy Field Of The Magnet To A Warp Drive Motor A Aircraft With A Negative Electron Field Generator, Is Field Propulsion Or Call A Warp Field Genarator
Field Propulsion
The Electronic Engine; With No Movin Part.
Will Help US Get Out Earth Gravity Well !
First learn English, then learn physics, then - armed with that knowledge - realise that these guys are a bunch of losers.
Entertaining the idea that we can get a blackhole out of constantly accelerating charged styrofoam that means we can deliberately create a small one ~50 AU or so at the edge of our solar system for the ultimate gravity slingshot to Proxima Centauri lmao
Why at the edge of our solar system?
@@Jurassic_Fart For safety
why is it that guys inventing anti-gravity tech don't have a properly functionning microphone or computer in 2024?
This kind of technology is expensive to build on Earth, even a rocket propulsion cost hundred of millions to billions, if you guys can mine the asteroid first rather than traveling to another system then you would have enough resources to build a quadrillion/quintillion warp-drive space-ship.
100 mico N? He doesn't seem to have many answers or be able to explain fundamentals or his own expressions? It seems he's trying to explain concepts known for decades... He's been working this project for decades... Are grants involved here? Keep up the good work.
Boy, would this ever work well with the James Webb. In fact it will work perfectly to send AI to 16 Psyche. Now if only NASA is listening. What is needed is a grappling device to use with James Webb. That way the time constraints will be removed from James Webb. Now to help the cooling system.
1:36:40 no will not happen. Will dont create balck hole. it wont go to infinit. because the energy will disipate. Like capacitor will keep charge but will lose it over time. And most important dont increase by it self the energy if is unpluged, that mean will not create black hole or sun or anything because this stuffs requiere "food" supply. Like gym wellness, if they dont get protein and excercise they lower its muscle.
But let say this dont lose its charge the thurst force is constant so it will speed up that increase it kinetic energy. That mean its increasing its energy but dont worry Einstein save us hhahah E=mc^2
He's agitated
Same physics that drive the universe once we abandon general relativity and realize it’s an electric universe.
The "electric universe" idea has been debunked over and over.
@@BadassRaiden show me the dark matter then
@@eskuriad Of course you would, in order to prove the legitimacy of your position, ask to be shown something that cannot be seen with current technology. The fact of the matter is that there is no model that has ever been put forward for the "electric universe hypothesis" that has EVER predicted or accurately described past and current observations. Period. It's garbage. Thats why its still considered a hypothesis, not a theory. The two theoretical frameworks that have accurately predicted and described virtually every observation we have ever made, are Einstein's theory of general relativity and quantum mechanics.
So i dont have to show you the dark matter. I just have to show you all the observations it has predicted correctly, which is virtually all of them. It's you who needs to do the showing, which would be how many observations the "electric universe" model has predicted or accurately described, which is literally, and i do mean that word in its absolute sense - literally none. The motion of celestial bodies apparently connected by plasma isnt even accurately predicted or described by the model, and that notion is the central postulate of the model. Gravity describes it almost perfectly, with the exception of dark matter and the unknown nature of how it fits into the framework. But even if you take out dark matter and just try to explain everything with the electric model, it fails. So not only does it fail when trying to describe everything, but even when trying to describe only that which relativity already describes perfectly, it fails there too, as well as failing to describe correctly everything already accurately described by quantum mechanics.
@@BadassRaiden good luck with your fusion reactor starship.
@@eskuriad nice change of subject cuz you know the electric universe model is dogshit.
looks like recycled T. Townsend Brown claims. nothing new here.
They did already from it quite a bit...
Sounds like a bunch of bullshit.
yeah. im sceptical until someone repeats it, or i see a peer reviwed study.
@@Astarov ahahaha no, you cannot.
@@Astarov Because I can't try it, highlighting the fact that you can't just "build it yourself." That's like telling someone if they don't believe in space, to just build a rocket in their backyard to take them there. You can build a rocket in your backyard for sure, but it won't take you to space. There's a reason the rockets and shuttles NASA builds to take passengers to space are as big as they are.
@@Astarov and you think a couple thousand dollars will build you technology capable of what they're describing? Again, exactly the reason I called bullshit.
@BadassRaiden Your bullshit call has no basis. You are just dismissing something for no reason other than intuition. The man has solid credentials, they have a physical theory which was clearly presented, and they have experimental evidence, as well as patents. Does not make sense to call bullshit.
Bullshit
I'm skeptical too but non of us know how everything works, we've only had like 200 years to get to where we are so relax, do you know how everything works? I think you don't.....😒