Fabiano Caruana talks to Alejandro Ramirez after defeating Hans Niemann during the eighth round of the 2022 Sinquefield Cup. 2022.09.10 KasparovChess.com GrandChessTour.org
You gotta respect Fabi. He's a great chess player who just goes in, does his job, is never toxic, never creates controversies, never says anything inflammatory, and explains every detail in his calculation in the post-game analysis. He's been extremely humble and grounded his whole career.
What I like about Fabi is that in his analysis, he calculates every line till the very end, just like he would in a real game, wheras *ahem ahem Hans Niemann*, other people just rely on their "intuition" and call positions that are hard to understand "clearly winning"(in some extreme cases even if they aren't, again *ahem ahem Hans Niemann*)
@@rxw5520 There have been some toxic ones, such as Veselin Topalov, Vladimir Kramnik, Sergey Karjakin, Bobby Fischer, etc. Even if they aren't that toxic, Fabi is certainly among the most humble.
Fabi always just a class act. Cooly and calmly explains his lines, always humble. Loved him and Hess together for the WCC coverage. Could listen to this guy analyse for days
@@gouverneur2001, I love Magnus and I am a big time fan for his chess. He is undoubtedly GOAT. Though, that doesn’t give him license to act in a way that he acted. He played bad game and then left putting Hans in this difficult situation. Just because Hans cheated online when young and got punished for the same, that doesn’t mean he should get punished like this for over the board game …
@@Jinan_Shah Kant's categorical imperative shines light on this question. Hans knew he shouldn't cheat and did so anyways. More than the two times he admitted to, reportedly. Once a cheater, always a cheater.
Exactly. That's why people are so suspicious of Hans. I don't know if he cheated or not. But that interview after the Magnus game, he seemed like a guy who had a computer shoved up his ass.
@@howardlam6181 yeah but even the lines he explained, every GM there, Including the one interviewing him was like “ what… that doesn’t make sense” and then he was like ahhhhh I don’t know
@@jeremy144713 You were talking about the 1 interview at the Cup. The other interviews he did were fine, especially before the cheating scandal. Stress can make you doubt yourself and make everything not make sense.
Great job today. Fabiano, a merit-based and “drama-free” performer who talks less but performs at high level. We will miss you on Sunday. G-d bless Fabiano. Best wishes!
At around 10:05 when Fabi was mentioning that Hans was playing fast and that he was trying to "semi-bluff" him...what does this mean? Trying to make it seem like he has calculated variations that he had not?
Hans had a significant time advantage at the end of this game. I believe he was aware of that and tried to put pressure on Fabi, maybe secure the draw by playing quickly. Bluff, in the respect that you play quickly and confidently, giving the impression that you know how to draw the position. Convince your opponent that your moves are accurate even if they aren't. Maybe you're not calculating as far as usual, playing more on intuition. That strategy can backfire when you're not accurate, as happened in the game.
Hans was bluffing that he was sure of his position and he was playing fast because Fabi only had like 2 minutes left he didn’t want fabi to have any time to think
Audio and video aren't in sync. This is not the first video on this yt channel where audio and video aren't in sync. I know that this is not a fault of my phone as when I watch other yt videos everything works fine.
I don't know Caruana, mostly indulge in games and matches of old times. Very interesting to follow his way of thinking. It seems to be both analytical and intuitive. Cool gentleman,too.
@@TheGregcawthorne Interesting. I am trying to watch on my iPad, so I tried updating CZcams, and it still didn’t work. My wife tried on her laptop, and it worked fine. Weird.
yeah and the same guy says he is a good player and that he played well, so if by your comment you are trying to imply Fabi is a good player and Hans is not, then why is the player you consider good differs from your opinion against Hans? it seems you're logic is quite fuzzy
@@Eirikross better than anyone in history? lol no he did not played better than anyone in history. Also the analysis you are referring to is not his game against Magnus, and maybe juuuust maybe if just before the number one player in the world accuse you of cheating to his hundreds of thousands of simps on the internet and every one of them starts attacking you, maybe that would mess with you headspace don't you think?
You can find many grandmaster quotes in which they say that “they only calculate up to 6 moves” and that’s based on pattern recognition in which they have a lot of.
Hans rely heavily on intituition. If the opponent is quite good in calculation, they can take avantage of his inaccuracies. That's why he losed against So and Caruano. He need to change his playing style to survive at 2700 level.
Well he knocked Hans out of 2700 range, feels like "Chess is starting to speak for itself" just like E.Lasker said "Lies and hypocrisy doesn't live long on the chessboard..."(i mean either Magnus is playing way way below his capacity in the here and now...or there is really something up with Hans that is not so cool?🤷♂️(But as Kasparov mention...Magnus must explain why he bailed out of this tournament, with concrete reasons...he owes the chess world that, because he is the WC, and that office comes with certain obligations and responsibilities...so we are waiting!
so far he hasn't lived up to that at all, He played subpar in that game with Niemann, overlooking several chances to draw and then pulls out with that linked video, igniting a witchhunt, and watches silently as it unfolds. Meanwhile some people assume that 'Magnus must be right and therefore Hans cheated'. That is just the definition of a witch hunt when you use your superior reputation to besmirch others and let the rabble judge someone instead of letting an evidence-based investigation decide.
People talk about Hans might be cheating in over the board chess. HOWW??? If you ask me, he's been playing chess at the highest level for a long time now and is ONLY 19 still. Magnus wasn't world champion until 23. Give Hans some time to work out the kinks. He has a lot of raw talent. Sometimes he'll play fast and blunder a move. Sometimes he will know exactly what has to be done and grab a big W. If he was cheating like a few think he's cheating, then why hasn't he won a tournament yet? Why would he allow himself to lose to some people he should not lose to? He would win or draw to anyone. Also, the people who think he's cheating can't even come up with how that would happen.
Maybe he's losing as a result of the pressure and stress put on him. Maybe it has nothing to do with social media or with the tournament, and he's just regressing to the mean. If there's one thing that this controversy has shown it's that people don't understand how to use evidence, and they especially don't understand what constitutes good evidence and bad. No one seems to consider alternate explanations for what they're seeing or consider counter evidence for their preferred Theory. Personally, I find some of his arrogance in his interviews to be obnoxious, and I think it's a bad sign that he cheated online. However so far no one has presented any strong evidence that he has cheated over the board, and anti cheating experts have stated that they haven't been able to find evidence of cheating in his games. All of the principal actors involved in this drama are staying silent, except for Hans. Neither Magnus Carlsen or the tournament organizers have made official statements. The people making confident statements about this issue are idiots on the internet who don't know anything.
@@ianhruday9584 The STLCC executive director, Tony Rich, made two official statements - he gave an interview the day Magnus left and he also gave an interview yesterday I think. There is also a chief arbiter written statement that's been published on STLCC socials. They've both said there has never been any indication of cheating and the decision to implement extra anti-cheating measures was made by the chief arbiters "on behalf of the players and the event", however you interpret that.
@@aesaphyr I saw the first interview which wasn't very illuminating. I wasn't aware of the second statement or of the statement from the chief arbiter.
Wow! This is what a 2800 ELO postgame interview sounds like. Effortless, crisp variations mixed with intuitive "human" assessments. Fabiano such a brilliant commentator. Confident but with a touch of humility. His immense, world-champ caliber playing strength shines through. Quite a contrast from some of the other postgame interviews from this event. 😯🤐
How many super tournament Fabi have been in? 50+ maybe? How many Hans have been in? ONE. Indeed you can't compare the two of them because first, they are very different humans amd second their experiences in these super tournament are very disparate.
what are you smoking?🤦🏻♂this postgame analysis is 2000 at best. Fabi is confused , kept asking for lines and making excuses. Hans explains better than him by a mile
He says he's crushing his opponents in a position and they have no chance, but even the commentator is questioning him on it. And outplaying him. And the engine says that it's dead even, or he's behind by a percentage point. He states he just so happened to study a line the morning of that Magnus has never played before. Other GMs can't figure out what he's talking about, he's suggesting moves in post interviews that blunder pieces in lines that he supposedly studied that morning. He's already been banned for online cheating. Sure, there's no "hard evidence" for OTB cheating, however you don't have to be a detective to see there's probable cause for cheating concerns
Yeah, it sucks, the best would have been to not cheat first back then and get caught, reputations can get in the way of giving the benefit of the doubt...
Where's the evidence of him cheating in this tournament don't make speculations just because magnus withdrew if magnus would have won this wouldn't be as big right now
If you're under 2100 FIDE, please stop commenting if Fabi or Hans analysis is good or bad, you just don't understand. Everyone over 2220 can see why there's so much suspicion. A real 2700 GM analysis provide insights & intuition, and they can sense which are "computer moves".
Almost every single super GM who has commented on this has said there wasn't a single "computer move" in the Hans-Magnus game. Not even Hikaru, who is clearly biased against Hans, denies this.
I think Wesley, after trolling Hans," Thank you for the anti-cheating team.", got the taste of his own medicine yesterday against Alireza... Fabi's the real good guy..
You gotta respect Fabi. He's a great chess player who just goes in, does his job, is never toxic, never creates controversies, never says anything inflammatory, and explains every detail in his calculation in the post-game analysis. He's been extremely humble and grounded his whole career.
hans could learn a thing or two from him
None of them are toxic.
What I like about Fabi is that in his analysis, he calculates every line till the very end, just like he would in a real game, wheras *ahem ahem Hans Niemann*, other people just rely on their "intuition" and call positions that are hard to understand "clearly winning"(in some extreme cases even if they aren't, again *ahem ahem Hans Niemann*)
@@Drew_goo more like hikaru
@@rxw5520 There have been some toxic ones, such as Veselin Topalov, Vladimir Kramnik, Sergey Karjakin, Bobby Fischer, etc. Even if they aren't that toxic, Fabi is certainly among the most humble.
audio is disynched to prevent cheating
Can’t they re-sync past broadcasts?
Literally unwatchable…
*desynced
Fabi gives great interviews always enjoy hearing his thoughts post game.
Fabi was having a tough time recently, but hopefully he will get back to the 2800+ club one day, very classy player.
And he did!!
Look at the difference in analysis of Fabi vs Hans. Post game interview speaks for itself.
the more craziness there is around, the better fabi looks
other way around too then
The hero of the tournament : Alejandro Ramirez !
Yeah Alejandro is very good at dealing with the different personalities of these top players.
Yeah - never really appreciated him until today.
What we don't see here is Alejandro is also keeping reddit updated lol
True story
yeah just keep praising mr ramirez, im sure that will turn out great for you.
Fabi gives one of the best interviews you can just hear him speak for hours and he makes some great points while he does speak.
Fabi always just a class act. Cooly and calmly explains his lines, always humble. Loved him and Hess together for the WCC coverage. Could listen to this guy analyse for days
I've never notice how similar his speech pattern and voice is to Eric Rosen.
Oh, yeah, you're right.
Was looking for this comment.
Have we ever seen Eric Rosen and Fabiano together at the same time...?
Good call
@@overnightdelivery You can see Fabi in the background of Eric vs Magnus:)
Fabi is the perfect antidote to all the silly chess drama.
What's silly about a known cheater being admitted to a tournament and ruining it for the 5 times world champion? It's silly by Hans, if anything.
@@gouverneur2001 Magnus ruined it for himself by playing poorly
@@gouverneur2001, I love Magnus and I am a big time fan for his chess. He is undoubtedly GOAT.
Though, that doesn’t give him license to act in a way that he acted. He played bad game and then left putting Hans in this difficult situation.
Just because Hans cheated online when young and got punished for the same, that doesn’t mean he should get punished like this for over the board game …
True, not a bad loser and drama queen like my countryman Magnus
@@Jinan_Shah Kant's categorical imperative shines light on this question. Hans knew he shouldn't cheat and did so anyways. More than the two times he admitted to, reportedly. Once a cheater, always a cheater.
Fabi is always a pleasure to listen to.
Jaw on the floor watching this. Fabi's calculations are unbelievable
Agreed. After all, he's one of the strongest players in history.
And then at the end he casually recalls a random endgame from 2010.
Ultimate Chad moment at 12:30
In the other hand that cheater can't calculate anything
@@prajwalbharambe343 no proof he cheated keep crying 12 year old 1000 rated hikaru sucker
these post game interviews were GREAT
Svidler, the only man who will be able to give his own eulogy!
So Fabi will be doing podcast on regular basis. I can't believe my ears🥺😲😍
My ears will be pleased.
@@ordinarryalien absolutely
Then he will become andrew tate (jk)
Fabi is out here explaining all these possible moves and lines and Hans is like” ahhh I don’t need to explain, it speaks for itself”
Exactly. That's why people are so suspicious of Hans. I don't know if he cheated or not. But that interview after the Magnus game, he seemed like a guy who had a computer shoved up his ass.
@@michaeledmondson4385 haha right 😂😂 I agree. I don’t know if he did or not but damn he did himself no favors with his suspicious attitude
Not on every game. He did explain on a few games, especially before all of these cheating allegations
@@howardlam6181 yeah but even the lines he explained, every GM there, Including the one interviewing him was like “ what… that doesn’t make sense” and then he was like ahhhhh I don’t know
@@jeremy144713 You were talking about the 1 interview at the Cup. The other interviews he did were fine, especially before the cheating scandal. Stress can make you doubt yourself and make everything not make sense.
Looks like they added a 15 min delay only to the audio and left the video in real time
Great job today. Fabiano, a merit-based and “drama-free” performer who talks less but performs at high level. We will miss you on Sunday. G-d bless Fabiano. Best wishes!
Fabi no drama, just solid all around.
Really liked this interview. They need to make the chess board better quality and to use it more often. Fabi's a natural.
Fabi is cool, smart, and tactical that it's a joy to watch and listen to him. I first realeazed during last Candidates, great analysis and commentary
Sound is way off.
How did you guys mess up the audio sync?
Its driving me crazy
Fabi's win was more than impressive
Bravo, Caruana!
Such a gentleman
audio is messed up
So is the chess community now
The audio and video aren’t synched on my device. Hopefully it’s just me.
Fabi is a fabulous chess player.
He reminds me of Eric Rosen. Something about his soft and charming voice.
WHY Is so damn difficult to find the standings of this tournament? is it made on purpose?
is nobody gonna talk about how the audio and video arent in sync
Yes!!! let's go Fabi
At around 10:05 when Fabi was mentioning that Hans was playing fast and that he was trying to "semi-bluff" him...what does this mean? Trying to make it seem like he has calculated variations that he had not?
It means that Hans was making fast moves to try to bluff him.
Hans had a significant time advantage at the end of this game. I believe he was aware of that and tried to put pressure on Fabi, maybe secure the draw by playing quickly. Bluff, in the respect that you play quickly and confidently, giving the impression that you know how to draw the position. Convince your opponent that your moves are accurate even if they aren't. Maybe you're not calculating as far as usual, playing more on intuition. That strategy can backfire when you're not accurate, as happened in the game.
no, Hans knew Fabi is low on time so he wanted to cause zeitnot mistakes by playing fast himself despite having a lot of time.
Hans was bluffing that he was sure of his position and he was playing fast because Fabi only had like 2 minutes left he didn’t want fabi to have any time to think
Hans want to make Fabiano thinking he's getting tips from Stockfish so it's moving fast... 😄
The sound has been off on so many of these videos recently
Wonderful that the sound is off. Thanks so much. I’m so confused
Audio and video aren't in sync. This is not the first video on this yt channel where audio and video aren't in sync. I know that this is not a fault of my phone as when I watch other yt videos everything works fine.
I don't know Caruana, mostly indulge in games and matches of old times. Very interesting to follow his way of thinking. It seems to be both analytical and intuitive. Cool gentleman,too.
Wait 15 mins audio delay here?!?
Audio speaks for itself
Alejandro Ramirez is fanatstic
Apparently gameplay and now the analysis audio are on delay now too. 🙄
Why is the audio all out of sync in recent interviews???
15:00 When I picture someone happy that is the exact expression that comes to mind.
am i missing something here?
@@jbullock7445 It was just a joke. He says it has been fun, but he has the same old cyborg half smile.
@@Alkis05 oh, ok. now it makes sense )
Alejandro is excellent
Audio/vid is out of sync for me on iPhone
why is the engine not on?
Audio messed up
I love this interview. I just wish the sound matched up with the picture.
Is synced up for me!
@@TheGregcawthorne Interesting. I am trying to watch on my iPad, so I tried updating CZcams, and it still didn’t work. My wife tried on her laptop, and it worked fine. Weird.
Same it’s weird for me
The audio is glitched
For me as a beginner in chess it's like if someone talks to an chess player about tcp/ip protocol 🤣
whats with audio?????
Hans is a very interesting player indeed
0:37 At the enhanced security check.
This is how a 2700+ analysis sounds.
2800*
fabi is so likeable
Too bad the audio is out of sync.
Magnus with his attitude.
The commentator is excellent
Fabi explains 10 different variations where all have 20 moves. Niemann has 1 with 3 moves tops.
yeah and the same guy says he is a good player and that he played well, so if by your comment you are trying to imply Fabi is a good player and Hans is not, then why is the player you consider good differs from your opinion against Hans? it seems you're logic is quite fuzzy
@@el_equidistante Just implying that Niemann played better than anyone in history and yet is unable to explain how.
@@Eirikross better than anyone in history? lol no he did not played better than anyone in history. Also the analysis you are referring to is not his game against Magnus, and maybe juuuust maybe if just before the number one player in the world accuse you of cheating to his hundreds of thousands of simps on the internet and every one of them starts attacking you, maybe that would mess with you headspace don't you think?
You can find many grandmaster quotes in which they say that “they only calculate up to 6 moves” and that’s based on pattern recognition in which they have a lot of.
That is 2700+ ELO Analysis !!!
The audio has been off in multiple interviews… please fix this
Who wears the hair better Alejandro or fabiano?
The messed up audio makes this almost unwatchable
Hans' Stockfish ia super interesting yeah
Hey, I know this guy!
It was interesting in the sense that the buzzing sounds coming from his crotch were very soothing and ASMR
Unwatchable. You’ve got to sync audio with video, guys.
4:15 🤣🤣 He saw Ra2, but he didn't like it.... Is he just trying to troll us?
Seems like chess is becoming like Poker
Is this theory? “Hansen”
Great analysis. How an analysis should be.
NOT the analysis where every suggested move is a blunder.
12:20
Hans rely heavily on intituition. If the opponent is quite good in calculation, they can take avantage of his inaccuracies. That's why he losed against So and Caruano. He need to change his playing style to survive at 2700 level.
Ian Nepomniachtchi was also intuitive
The delayed audio makes this video kinda unwatchable tbh. What Fabi is saying doesn’t match the board
Why do all GMs look like Bob Ross?
Need support to his own country guy hans
If Fabi's doo doesn't get the chicks, I don't know what will.
Seems that one of Fabi's weaknesses is chickening out from critical lines for safe variations in time pressure. 📝 OK Fabi, I got you next time.
This fabi dude's analysis is definitely above 2700, he should try professional chess
I see you’re a fan of Amy Schumer….
@@firstLast-jw7bm Well, except other chicks
Well he knocked Hans out of 2700 range, feels like "Chess is starting to speak for itself" just like E.Lasker said "Lies and hypocrisy doesn't live long on the chessboard..."(i mean either Magnus is playing way way below his capacity in the here and now...or there is really something up with Hans that is not so cool?🤷♂️(But as Kasparov mention...Magnus must explain why he bailed out of this tournament, with concrete reasons...he owes the chess world that, because he is the WC, and that office comes with certain obligations and responsibilities...so we are waiting!
so far he hasn't lived up to that at all, He played subpar in that game with Niemann, overlooking several chances to draw and then pulls out with that linked video, igniting a witchhunt, and watches silently as it unfolds. Meanwhile some people assume that 'Magnus must be right and therefore Hans cheated'. That is just the definition of a witch hunt when you use your superior reputation to besmirch others and let the rabble judge someone instead of letting an evidence-based investigation decide.
@@FredPlanatia yea you're right we are waiting and watching🤠
aaah, chess is starting to speak for itself when your prejudice is confirmed. Great philosophy.
the answers are coming out.
Yeah so far the chess world and other gms have backed magnus claims of being suspicious to Hans in some ways but magnus needs to explain more.
Compare Fabi’s analysis to Hans’s!!! 😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
video is out of synch
Hans: gotta play quick before the beads run out of battery
Do you know how many top players have at least 5 cm of hear above their head. But then again : is Hans a top player ?
People talk about Hans might be cheating in over the board chess. HOWW??? If you ask me, he's been playing chess at the highest level for a long time now and is ONLY 19 still. Magnus wasn't world champion until 23. Give Hans some time to work out the kinks. He has a lot of raw talent. Sometimes he'll play fast and blunder a move. Sometimes he will know exactly what has to be done and grab a big W. If he was cheating like a few think he's cheating, then why hasn't he won a tournament yet? Why would he allow himself to lose to some people he should not lose to? He would win or draw to anyone. Also, the people who think he's cheating can't even come up with how that would happen.
Is hans starting to lose after boosted security?
If they found something, it will definitely be reported. Doesn’t seem like he’s cheating
Maybe he's losing as a result of the pressure and stress put on him. Maybe it has nothing to do with social media or with the tournament, and he's just regressing to the mean.
If there's one thing that this controversy has shown it's that people don't understand how to use evidence, and they especially don't understand what constitutes good evidence and bad. No one seems to consider alternate explanations for what they're seeing or consider counter evidence for their preferred Theory.
Personally, I find some of his arrogance in his interviews to be obnoxious, and I think it's a bad sign that he cheated online. However so far no one has presented any strong evidence that he has cheated over the board, and anti cheating experts have stated that they haven't been able to find evidence of cheating in his games.
All of the principal actors involved in this drama are staying silent, except for Hans. Neither Magnus Carlsen or the tournament organizers have made official statements. The people making confident statements about this issue are idiots on the internet who don't know anything.
Yes.
@@ianhruday9584 The STLCC executive director, Tony Rich, made two official statements - he gave an interview the day Magnus left and he also gave an interview yesterday I think. There is also a chief arbiter written statement that's been published on STLCC socials. They've both said there has never been any indication of cheating and the decision to implement extra anti-cheating measures was made by the chief arbiters "on behalf of the players and the event", however you interpret that.
@@aesaphyr I saw the first interview which wasn't very illuminating. I wasn't aware of the second statement or of the statement from the chief arbiter.
Wow! This is what a 2800 ELO postgame interview sounds like. Effortless, crisp variations mixed with intuitive "human" assessments. Fabiano such a brilliant commentator. Confident but with a touch of humility. His immense, world-champ caliber playing strength shines through. Quite a contrast from some of the other postgame interviews from this event. 😯🤐
the interviewer and commentators weren't interrogating him and they were feeding him lines.
Sycophant
How many super tournament Fabi have been in? 50+ maybe? How many Hans have been in? ONE. Indeed you can't compare the two of them because first, they are very different humans amd second their experiences in these super tournament are very disparate.
3:30 this wasn't crisp lmao
what are you smoking?🤦🏻♂this postgame analysis is 2000 at best. Fabi is confused , kept asking for lines and making excuses. Hans explains better than him by a mile
Why do all chess players say “and ok…” it’s the weirdest thing like they’re all impersonating another chess player
See that’s a 2700+ analysis
He says he's crushing his opponents in a position and they have no chance, but even the commentator is questioning him on it. And outplaying him. And the engine says that it's dead even, or he's behind by a percentage point. He states he just so happened to study a line the morning of that Magnus has never played before. Other GMs can't figure out what he's talking about, he's suggesting moves in post interviews that blunder pieces in lines that he supposedly studied that morning. He's already been banned for online cheating. Sure, there's no "hard evidence" for OTB cheating, however you don't have to be a detective to see there's probable cause for cheating concerns
Hans it's going to get criticized if he make a fast move or if you make a slow move so can someone tell me what is he supposed to do
Yeah, it sucks, the best would have been to not cheat first back then and get caught, reputations can get in the way of giving the benefit of the doubt...
He's supposed to not cheat.
Stop cheating
That's confirmation bias at work. Whatever he does, it is interpreted as evidence that he is a cheater.
Where's the evidence of him cheating in this tournament don't make speculations just because magnus withdrew if magnus would have won this wouldn't be as big right now
what no weird accent, no "the variation speaks for itself", no blunders in the analysis? how's even possible?
If you're under 2100 FIDE, please stop commenting if Fabi or Hans analysis is good or bad, you just don't understand.
Everyone over 2220 can see why there's so much suspicion. A real 2700 GM analysis provide insights & intuition, and they can sense which are "computer moves".
So are you thinking what I think you are thinking?
bro you’re probably 1000
Almost every single super GM who has commented on this has said there wasn't a single "computer move" in the Hans-Magnus game. Not even Hikaru, who is clearly biased against Hans, denies this.
The cops are competent!
Of course W.CHAMP is unique 😉😜😂🤟
Fabi is good personality other than Chess
seems like a nightmare to calculate all of this
Hosts need a cough button
I think Wesley, after trolling Hans," Thank you for the anti-cheating team.", got the taste of his own medicine yesterday against Alireza...
Fabi's the real good guy..
Wesley PIPI So is arse on the ligue with Nakamura
Wesley is always accusing everyone lol